where we are colleagues, he is also the author of many, many books, but most importantly.

paratrooper, whom i know, who is also a real, genuine, very courageous russian patriot, it is a great pleasure to see you on the program, thank you, i certainly do not deserve these kind words, precisely because you have such modesty, you deserve it more than you deserve, well, okay, you embarrassed me, now i will embarrass you even more, only not -

and suddenly something starts to go wrong. and russia is faced with this. from my point of view, from my point of view, this is a tactical, not a strategic issue, and the main thing is, it seems to me that we can identify the source of our difficulties. firstly, our enemies. europe, and secondly, part of the american elite, which has united with the deep state, they still stand on the positions of globalism and russophobia. your analysis? i think you are absolutely right, and here the point is, of course, that what we

see today in europe is a concentrated, concentrated hatred to us, in fact, open preparation for war with russia, they do not hide it, they participate in the war on the side of the criminal kiev regime, without hiding it, preparing for a larger-scale involvement in the war with us, and this is an open, open program, it would seem, in america after the arrival of trump, trumpists.

he occupies peripheral positions, trumpists are new people, maga, now they will pursue their policy, after some time, and trump, who proclaimed that we will now end the conflict, it is necessary, zelensky himself started this war, this war is not mine, but biden's, respectively, and biden is the globalist deep state with which trump himself and the trumpists are fighting, there was a feeling that we could come to an agreement, indeed, there were serious grounds for this, but suddenly.

wild russophobic positions, he began to say: i am ready to listen to both sides, i want to end this conflict, i am not happy with zelensky's position and the steps of the kiev regime, from these clear positions trump is constantly being pushed, and it feels like he wants to emerge

like a drowning man and a new wave, and a new wave, him, actually from the party, linzigrem, with blumenthal, who recently visited kiev and simply disavowed. trump's peacekeeping steps, that is, he is constantly in his desire to pursue his policy, sovereign policy, trumpist policy is constantly being thrown back to previous positions, on the other hand, he clearly wants to stop the war, but he really does not know how, he is not deeply immersed in the problematic, does not quite understand how existential a challenge what is happening there is for us, how consolidated... the state without or in america is still in principle a world state, a world deep center, all this pressure

from europe on him from both sides and the lack of understanding, and perhaps the impossibility of delving into the details of the ukrainian conflict, in general , is a blow to him, it is not only bad for us. it is bad, it is also very bad for him, maybe even not as bad for us as for him, because if trump will involved, thrown into this war, included in the full program in the escalation process, this, in fact, will be his end in his policy and in front of his electorate, and we see that both steve bannen and alex jones are now actively criticizing trump's indecisiveness in peace with russia, they are very serious, they are his closest supporters, they are representatives of his... mass electorate of such people of the american present, they are very critical of his hesitation and simply tell him: you promised peace, where is the peace? you promised to stop supporting zelensky for this nazi regime, and where is this, why is there no stop? this

is actually very serious, that is why the deep state is fighting on two fronts, against us and against trump himself. i think it is important to understand what we are up against and what they are guided by, today trump is negotiating in washington with friedrich merz, but he is the chancellor of germany, he is, as you know, the grandson of an active, unfinished nazi, a man, there were many nazis in germany, but you know, not all of them were active, and well, many just.

never separated himself from his grandfather, never said that, well, it is clear, the man needed to survive, he was even the mayor for some time, but that he himself personally condemns all this, he did not do this, and i am especially interested to see the new fashion among his supporters, walking around berlin with a faq.

i would like to draw attention to the fact that the current mertz is a different, different edition of nazism, they have a lot in common, but there are also significant differences, for example, that... the third party in germany, where the case is in the gdr on the territory of west prussia

and the first party in its ratings, so it represents, it represents itself as an enemy of merz, who merz categorically wants to deprive it of the right to participate in political life there at all, despite its colossal popularity, that is, this is some special nazism of the new generation, which is associated with liberalism, with feminism, with the woc agenda, with lgbt.

person it is simply for whom nazism is expressed in pure hatred of others, in a pure desire for affirmation their own this time fanatical liberal agendas, this is a special liberal globalism and liberal fascism, this is what brings merz closer to macron, who is very similar to him only from a french point of view, this is such a liberal neo-napoleon from... with starmer, who, kerr starmer, who represents the british version of this liberal, liberal nazism with american - and democrats, the naokons, that is, we are dealing with a globalist, globalist version of nazism, of course, if you pay attention to their roots, many of them really go back to real historical fascism, if we talk about germany or france or some extreme right-wing structure of the previous 20th century, but this is already a new, new ideology,

it is just as misanthropic, and maybe even more misanthropic than fascism, there really are certain roots, but at the same time here there is also - there is a very interesting element, this is self-hatred, hatred of western culture, hatred of the classical foundations of western identity, that is, these are the leaders.

philosopher yes, hitler but he was not to blame for this, yes, of course, i think, after all, nitsche was a favorite philosopher of maxim gorky and many liberals, therefore karl popper, he inspired, probably, i think, the most diverse ideological trends of the 20th century, he himself was inspired by dostoevsky, that is, it is also necessary, this is a very complex mosaic, i just mean that the idea of ​​a superman, it has now brought a new character, that is, in this liberal fascism, it is rather a technocrat, it is... artificial intelligence, it is a posthuman, these are the highest,

richest representatives of the liberal west, who will ensure immortality for themselves, that is, physical immortality, this is very reminiscent of a purely satanic civilization, maybe we are not used to reasoning in such terms in a country where for a century, probably, an atheistic ideology prevailed, but this is a very impressive figure, a satanic civilization, a civilization of the antichrist, who wants to... replace humanity, simply displace it, subjugate it, and they are not the only ones who are going to lead war with us or to remove and trap trump, but in relation to their... peoples and their societies, they take a completely nihilistic position, i just don't understand the europeans, that's who i don't understand now, i stop understanding them, seeing that they are offered suicide, from and washing out all their own values, a break with their traditions, a complete break, replacing themselves either with migrants, or uncontrollably,

or robots, they vote obediently, that's what happens to the european, that's what the americans showed, what... they said enough, let's choose something else, let's see if there is anything else in this world, they chose trump and maga, despite the fact that they were demonized by the media, monstrously, and the europeans are such communication that they are fascinated, maga is make america again, yes, and the europeans are fascinated by this monstrous hypnosis that the liberal elites produce on them, project and even if they would like to say:

the personification of this liberal satanic project has become an organization called nato. let's listen to what its secretary general, mr. rut, says about this organization, it's worth a lot. nato is the most powerful defense alliance in the history of mankind, even more powerful than the roman empire and more powerful than napoleon's empire. we are the most powerful defense coalition in history, but even a defense alliance needs to be serviced. that's why nato has a whole system, a defense planning process, which is necessary for coordinating goals for building up defense potential. this means that we will have a full absolute clarity about where we are now and where we need to be to protect ourselves not only today but in the years to come. this is what we are up against: napoleon, hitler, hegemony,

yes, well, we know that the previous ones were like that.

because of our troubles, but that also happens, and napoleon is even more serious, it is a coalition of how many peoples of europe. and what is hitler - it is already such a metaphysical force that came at us very, very powerfully, every time here is the scale of our the enemy that fought against us and against whom we fought,

grew, in general, i would not take these threats lightly, that is, we really are now facing a confrontation with modern western civilization, this is serious, of course, here is the issue with trump, who does not fit into this agenda at all, he criticized nato, and wanted to turn america around and take it out of this globalist atlantis course, that is, this is the only factor that , by and large, still represents, well, if you like, a fuse, how long will it last, how quickly will these plugs fly out? it's hard to say, it's clear now that there is overstrain along the entire chain, but at least this is some kind of postponement, or something of the acuteness, how much of this.

on the peoples whom russia united in our death, we even talk about this, this is a serious test, here is a simple one, but by and large very difficult, let's imagine if we had agreed on ukraine, and imagine this, in general there would have been an agreement that would have been much closer to the conditions of russia than ukraine, but nevertheless we agreed, let's...

we didn't understand, we said, this is an eternal victory, after that it will have eternal peace, yes, no way, knowing the west, knowing our people, knowing the logic of world history, we really won ourselves back at such a price several decades of peaceful life, which , starting from forty-sixth year, we had to use to prepare for the next war, for the next war, we partially did so, but only partially, and then we forgot that wars happen, and there is no such situation, no such... historical period when they would be excluded, therefore we would simply postpone it indefinitely, for a very short period, this is also important, only now not for 10 years, here i want to say,

if there was a truce, we would not have achieved it, it would not have been a victory, it would have been a compromise, and this compromise would have been fragile and could have been cancelled at any moment, we need at least, at least several decades to achieve peace for several decades, this is what the president is talking about. but no, he talks about this, of course, we need a victory, several decades is a victory, we are winning this war convincingly and seriously, we are forcing russia's sovereignty to be considered, we have these several decades, war can still overtake us, and even in this case, in the case of incredible successes, military successes in ukraine, it was still necessary, it will be necessary, after this is achieved, to immediately prepare for defense, to...

with india. china and even

a significant number of states the greater south, i have a feeling that in general we are far from alone in this fight, the second, our advantage, when i look at this coalition that opposes us, it seems to me that this coalition before the first big defeat, it was like it was with napoleon, it was like it was with hitler.

until the american pressure on china or india, the islamic and wait, world, africa, latin america, gives the opposite results, it seems to me, we will not go that far, we need to step up now, to do a lot of work in this direction. that is, at one time we had komintern, who was engaged in common forms, who was engaged in the dissemination of ideas aimed at the interests of the soviet union, when we were alone, we still worked all over the world, now we need, of course, suddenly in another model, we are not a soviet state, we are conductors of multipolarity, but multipolarity is our ideology today, and this means opposition and sovereignty in relation to pressure to the west,

that is, we are promoting honestly multipolarity. trump is an uprising, a populist uprising real america, of which there was no trace at all in the previous stages, political decades, here it made itself known, therefore i think that this is also our potential ally, in europe, in america, there are also, in addition to the political elites, there are the peoples of these countries, who are completely different,

we must turn to them. moreover , when they sometimes say: look, this is a small movement, it is in opposition there, it is persecuted, and why should we help it, russia, in fact, our enemy does not care whether it is small or weak, marginal not marginal, he supports all the forces that are shaking our stability in our country, any marginal in general, and any marginal has the right to support, to receive political support from the state department if he opposes our government, of course we must go to such a degree, but nevertheless, not to pay attention to the status of those forces in their liberal, in fact totalitarian regimes in which they live, or to what they call them, and how they are branded, we need, if this is really ideologically useful, useful structures and forces, we can enter into a dialogue with them, so we need to understand that we will lag behind ourselves if we lag behind the whole world, only if we lag behind

the whole world, we... stand up for ourselves, we cannot hide in such a state of the world now technological, economic, political, social, that we cannot completely isolate ourselves, we must live and save ourselves together with the salvation of what can be saved in another world, that is why our foreign policy, in my opinion, must be proactive, not reactive, but active, that is, we must be one step ahead in many processes, often we only respond to certain challenges and in order to... in order to, in some sense, shake up this consolidated west, we need to move there and look for: