tv Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer CNN July 11, 2018 3:00pm-4:00pm PDT
secret snooping. senate smackdown. the republican-led chamber votes to rebuke the president on two fronts, sending a clear message about his criticism of nato and his policy on tariffs. will the frustration in his own party matter to mr. trump? and moving manafort. a federal judge orders the former trump campaign chairman to a new jail as the special counsel reveals that he's been getting the vip treatment. tonight, paul manafort's lawyers are disputing that he's been living in comfort behind bars. we want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer. you're in "the situation room." we're following an attack from within on the nato alliance by its de facto leader, president donald j. trump. he's been slamming some of the united states' closest allies directly to their faces, including a stunning claim that germany is, quote, a captive to
russia. tonight, many officials here at home and abroad, they are warning that the president is undermining nato as it tries to present a united front, a unified front against the man mr. trump refuses to call a foe. we're talking about vladimir putin. this hour, i'll talk with senate foreign relations committee member, ben carden. and i'll also speak with the german ambassador to the united states, emily hopper. and our correspondents and analysts, they are all standing by. first, let's go to our chief white house correspondent, jim acosta, with the president in brussels. jim, the president went there looking, what, for a fight? >> reporter: sure seems like it, wolf. this is exactly what u.s. allies feared this week the president ripping into the nato alliance just before he meets with russian president vladimir putin. the president actually began a tweet earlier today with four words. "what good is nato." >> good morning, everybody. good morning to the media.
the legitimate media and the fake news media. >> reporter: it was an unsettling scene in brussels as president trump picked a fight with nato. accusing long-standing allies in the decades-old partnership of taking advantage of u.s. military might. >> many countries owe us a tremendous amount of money since many years back when they were delinquent. no other president brought it up like i bring it up. >> reporter: the president lashed out on twitter, asking what good is nato if germany is paying russia billions of dollars for gas and energy. the message he relayed to the nato secretary general. >> if you look at it, germany is a captive of russia, because they get rid of their coal plants, they get rid of their nuclear. they're getting so much of the oil and gas from russia. i think it's something that nato has to look at. >> reporter: the president seemed to surprise nato by calling on alliance members to boost their defense spending to 4% of their gdp, double the
current nato goal. the u.s. is at 3.5%, while germany is way behind at just over 1%. the nato secretary general explained, unity is also needed when it comes to standing up to russia. >> also in dealing with russia, we are stronger. i think what we have seen -- >> you're just making russia richer. we're having a great meeting. discussing military expenditure. we're talking about trade. >> reporter: for all the president's tough talk, he didn't raise the issue of russian energy in front of the cameras with german chancellor angela merkel. when mr. trump met with the french president -- >> a friend of mine -- >> reporter: emmanuel macron made it clear he doesn't agree with the president. >> mr. macron, do you agree that angela merkel is owing to the russians? >> oh, i'm glad -- thank you. thank you very much. >> no. i think -- we work together.
>> reporter: merkel, who grew up in east germany during the cold war, insisted she understands russian aggression all too well. [ speaking in foreign language ] >> translator: because of current events, i want to add that i myself lived through a part of germany being controlled by the soviet union. >> reporter: the melodrama at the nato summit played out just days before mr. trump is set to hold critical talks with russian president, vladimir putin. the president's sharp words for germany appeared to be in response to criticism that he's too cozy with putin, a tactic he's used before, dating back to the 2016 election. >> well, that's because he's rather have a puppet as president. >> no puppet. >> it's pretty clear -- >> you're the puppet. >> reporter: back in washington, the president's rhetoric on nato unnerved fellow republicans. some in the gop were careful not to criticize the president. >> nato is indispensable. it's as important today as it ever has been. >> reporter: and some weren't. >> sometimes it feels like we punch our friends in the nose
and hold our hando paeahandout working against us like russia and putin. >> reporter: and it's unclear how much the president will moderate his tone as he heads to britain tomorrow. eg he is set to meet with theresa may who has had a tense relationship with mr. trump. he sits down with queen elizabeth on friday, the 13th, and heads off to finland to meet with the russian president, vladimir putin. i talked to a senior diplomatic source earlier today who said the president needs to be reminded of the fact that his hand will be strengthened if nato is united behind him. wolf? >> yeah, meeting with putin next monday in helsinki. jim acosta, thank you. let's bring in our chief national security correspondent, jim sciutto. jim, you've been speaking with diplomats from nato member countries. what are they telling you? >> reporter: frankly, wolf, they're telling me they're concerned. you see this coming out in some of the public comments from european leaders there. the president being challenged
directly to his face by the nato chief, by the french president, by the german chancellor. in private, those comments, those concerns, even more severe. one particular concern is this. they will get in private assurances from senior u.s. officials, military officials, secretary of defense mattis, for instance. assurances that the u.s. remains committed to all of its commitments in europe. the trouble is that those assurances are often contradicted by the president's public comments. and their concern is that while there's been that dissonance for a year-and-a-half now under the president's administration, that those assurances that they hear from those senior national security officials mean less over time. they're concerned that the president feels emboldened somewhat to make decisions on his own, and he's shown that with the iran nuclear deal, for instance. with negotiations with north korea, where he has overruled his most senior national security advisers. in europe there is kernel do the
same again with the national security issue, number one in the view of nato u.s. allies in europe, which is, of course, the threat from russia. >> is the president playing right into the hands of putin as a lot of his critics are suggesting? >> reporter: in his public comments, really, there's no question. i mean, president putin has one of his main goals has been to not just undermine the west, but undermine the nato alliance. and he's said so in public. just a year ago almost to the day, he said in a public forum, the following. he said the disputes over nato, do they help russia? well, in the sense that nato may fall apart, yes, this may help. so when he sees the american president in effect creating those disputes within nato -- because remember, the rest of the alliance is united in the face of russia, united in their commitments, et cetera. but when you see the american president standing alone and taking shots at his own nato allies, he is -- he's echoing
points, talking points of the russian president. just a fact. you see it there in the public comments of the russian president just last year. >> jim sciutto reporting for us. thank you. right now we're getting new reaction from germany to president trump's harsh words. we're joined by the german am boss to ambassador to the united states. thank you for joining us. and welcome to washington. i know you're new here. >> thank you. >> the president tweeted today these words. quote, what good is nato if germany is paying russia billions of dollars for gas and energy. that's from the president of the united states. does that kind of rhetoric make you worry about the survival of nato? >> no. because i'm an output and outcome person. and if i look at what has been decided in nato today, if i have a close look at the communique, what i see is that after the summit and because of very good preparations, nato is better -- in a better state than it was before. >> what about the rhetoric from the president of the united
states? you must be concerned when he utters these kinds of words. in a tweet today, what good is nato if germany is paying russia billions of dollars for gas and energy. how extraordinary is it that he's attacking a major nato ally like germany? >> well, the facts are, germany is having -- has invested a lot in the diversity of the energy sources. energy consumption, the share of the russian gas is 9%. very little. >> he says germany is a captive of russia, and those are poisonous words, given the history of angela merkel herself, the chancellor. she used to live under soviet occupation of east germany. >> as you pointed out, wolf, she said it in a very concise and very clear way. she has lived, as many germans did, in a state that was -- >> but saying that germany is a captive of russia. how do you react?
>> we look at outcomes. because that's what is important. >> you don't pay attention to his words? because words matter. >> words may matter, but what matters much, much more than words is what you do and what you achieve. and nato has achieved a lot on this day. we have increased the spending on nato. nearly every nato member has. we are all -- >> but do you believe you're being bullied on the world stage by the president? >> once again, we look at what is happening, what is being decided and that's important for the future of nato, as well. because we're being closely watched. >> let me put up on the screen, madam ambassador, some of the insults. these are public statements by the president of the united states as far as angela merkel, chancellor of germany, is concerned. and you can see some of the words. captive of russia. merkel is ruining germany. a total mess. big crime, he said. going through massive attacks to its people. people of germany are turning against their leadership.
this is the president really railing, belittling, the chancellor of germany. i know you're a diplomat and you want to be diplomatic. but it must be so irritating to you. >> well, but you haven't added that they had a very good talk and a very good meeting. both of them have said so publicly. they have discussed a range of issues as leaders should. and frankly, in alliances and partnerships, there will be disputes. so i agree, they should be dealt with in a family way. but if you look at the outcomes, and that's what's important. judge things by what happens and what is being decided on. >> you've been a diplomat for a while. have you ever heard an american president belittle a german chancellor the way this president does? >> i don't think that the chancellor came out of the meeting today with the american president feeling belittled. she said what she needed to say on the german experience of having been a controlled state in the eastern part -- >> so let me just be precise, madam ambassador.
despite these angry words by the president of the united states, the outcome of the meeting with chancellor merkel today was positive? >> they had a very good meeting, and i believe the nato summit was a very good summit, which made nato stand better than it has before. >> so is the president playing games, saying one thing publicly, but privately, behind closed doors, when he sits down with the chancellor, he utters different kinds of words? >> let's see what's happening. and let's see what's being decided on. in the long run, that will be important. >> the president now says, you know, it's not enough. 2% of germany's gdp is not enough, and you haven't reached that level as far as defense spending is concerned. he says it's got to be 4%. 4%. was that a stunning surprise to you today when he said that? >> it has been said by many interlocutors in the past. >> 4%? who said 4%? >> that germany has not achieved the 2% goal. >> right. 2% was the goal by 2024, imposed
in 2014. but all of a sudden the president saying 2%, and you haven't reached that, is not enough. it's got to be 4%. >> well, what the -- the agreement said in 2014, that we should move towards the 2% -- >> by 2024. >> by 2024. >> so all of a sudden the president changes that today. >> may i just lay out the facts? >> please. >> what germany, in fact, is doing? we have increased our defense spending by 30% over the past four years. and this year alone, we'll increase it by 11%. and by 2025, we will have raised our budget by 80%. these are -- >> so a 2% goal by 2024 be achieved in germany? >> what we will do is we will do what the -- what the wage commitment requires us to do. and that is move towards the 2% goal. our defense budget will have grown by 2025.
by 80%. that's not nothing. it will -- we will increase up to 20% our investment expenditures. all of this is required by the wage commitment, as well. and we stand by that. >> as you know, article 5 of the nato charter has only been implemented once, right after 9/11, the allies came to the defense of the united states, which had just been attacked by al qaeda. do you believe this president of the united states will honor article 5 if germany or any other member state of nato is attacked? >> as you have pointed out, it has been invoked only once, and it was extensionally important for the united states at the time to leverage and to multiply and magnify the power of -- their power by the power of nato and tools at its disposal.
and i'm convinced that this experience looms large in the american memory. >> do you believe the united states under president trump would defend germany if it came to that? >> i understand that all nato members and all nato countries stand by in a steadfast manner by article 5. >> so is that a yes? >> that is a yes. >> you believe the president will come to the -- >> i believe that the -- all nato members stand by article 5, and underscore its relevance and the relevance of the credibility. >> and even the baltic states like estonia, lithuania, members of nato, you believe the president would use u.s. military force to protect them if they were threatened by russia. >> no doubt was cast on the credibility of article 5. >> ambassador, thanks so much for joining us. >> thank you very much. >> don't leave yet. we're going to talk a little bit more. coming up, is your facebook
information in the hands of russian intelligence right now? we're getting new information on that. stand by for this breaking story. and is president trump doing more damage to nato than actual adversaries of the alliance? i'll talk to a top democrat on the senate foreign relations committee, senator ben cardin, of maryland. no measure is too extreme. the luxus high performance line. experience amazing at your lexus dealer. the new united explorer card hooks me up. getting more for getting away. traveling lighter. getting settled. rewarded! learn more at theexplorercard.com with my bladder leakage, the products i've tried just didn't fit right. they were very saggy. it's getting in the way of our camping trips. but with new sizes, depend fit-flex is made for me. introducing more sizes for better comfort. new depend fit-flex underwear is guaranteed to be your best fit.
(burke) so we know how to seen cover almost anything. even a "cactus calamity". (man 1) i read that the saguaro can live to be two hundred years old. (woman) how old do you think that one is? (man 1) my guess would be, about... (man 2) i'd say about two hundred. (man 1) yeah... (burke) gives houseplant a whole new meaning. and we covered it. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ by staying in rhythm. and to keep up this pace, i drink boost optimum. boost optimum with 5 in 1 advanced nutrition helps support muscle, energy, bone, normal immune function, and vision. boost optimum. be up for life. where in all of this is the stuff that matters? the stakes are so high, your finances, your future.
touch shows how we really feel. but does psoriasis ever get in the way? embrace the chance of 100% clear skin with taltz. up to 90% of those with moderate to severe psoriasis had a significant improvement of their psoriasis plaques. most people were still clearer after one year. with taltz, 4 out of 10 even achieved completely clear skin. don't use if you're allergic to taltz. before starting, you should be checked for tuberculosis. taltz may increase risk of infections
and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection, symptoms, or received a vaccine or plan to. inflammatory bowel disease can happen with taltz, including worsening of symptoms. serious allergic reactions can occur. ready for a chance at 100% clear skin? ask your doctor about taltz. until her laptop crashed this morning. her salon was booked for weeks, having it problems? ask a business advisor how to get on demand tech support for as little as $15 a month. right now, save $300 on our hp 2-in-1 laptop bundle at office depot officemax we have breaking news tonight on russian interference right here in the united states through facebook. information on millions of americans potentially in the
hands of intelligence operatives for the kremlin. our senior investigative correspondent, drew griffin, is here. drew, you've done extensive reporting on this. tell our viewers what you're learning. >> wolf, a source briefed on the investigation and misuse of facebook's data is telling cnn this russian company may have opened the door for millions of americans' user data to have been accessible to russian intelligence. a russian internet company developed hundreds of apps through facebook, which up until 2015 had the ability to download personal user information and the personal information of all those users' friends. a source tells cnn, mail.rue, which claims to have only tens of thousands of users in the united states, would have had access to millions of americans who were friends with those users.
a and that scooped up personal information was scooped up by the fsb, according to deputy assistant secretary of defense, michael carpenter. >> so mail.rue is a large russian company. it has to abide by russia's laws, has to do with the intelligence service's demand of it. and in this case they demand they provide access to all of their data. all of that has to be available to the russian intelligence services. >> reporter: that means if you were on facebook before the end of 2015 and connected to anyone who used mail.rue or its apps, the russian government could have have had access to your personal information, including your name, gender, birth date, location, photos and page likes. mail.rue denies gathering information, saying in a statement, we have not collected data on any facebook users, other than for the purposes of in-game mechanics. no matter, james lewis with says russian intelligence would be
very interested. >> big data is the secret today to intelligence. and if the russians who are very good at this have access to a pot of big data, i wouldn't be surprised if they used it. >> reporter: mail.ru had access to american users' personal information at a time when russia was launching its disinformation campaign through facebook and other social media. and began to meddle in the 2016 u.s. election. wolf, in a statement to cnn this afternoon, mail.ru is claiming user data was neither shared with nor made accessible to any government agency and also claims to have never harvested friends of users' data. the company says as of last night, though, it is now cooperating with facebook on facebook's own internal investigation. wolf? >> drew, thank you. let's talk about this and more with senator ben cardin, top democrat on the foreign relations committee. senator, how were you going to protect americans from this kind of intrusion? >> well, wolf, it's good to be
with you. i authored a report on behalf of the senate foreign relations committee six months ago that pointed out this is exactly what mr. putin is doing in russia. he's using cyber and he's using social media in order to get information to use against our country and people in our country. so we shouldn't be surprised with this revelation. what our report urged is we take steps within social media to protect against foreign interference in america. european countries have already started to do this. the united states has been slow in dealing with the social media companies to make sure this type of intrusion doesn't happen against americans. >> let's turn, senator, the president's overseas trip. he's meeting with nato allies in brussels today, which he kicked off with this tweet. i'll read to you. what good is nato if germany is paying russia billions of dollars for gas and energy? why are there only 5 of 29 countries that have met their commitment? the u.s. is paying for
protection then loses billions on trade. must pay 2% of gdp immediately, all caps, not by 2025. is the president putting the nato alliance in approximate jeopardy right now with that kind of rhetoric? >> well, wolf, the answer is it is certainly hurting the unity of our alliance, and that is to strengthen nato. i listened to the german ambassador, and she was certainly diplomatic. i talked to a european diplomat earlier today who said when the president uses those words, that type of bullying, it only makes it more difficult for our government to respond to what we need to do with nato, because it looks like we're giving into that type of tactics by the president of the united states. so it's counterproductive to getting the european members of nato to do more in regards to paying their share of the cost of defense. the president's tactics only weaken the nato alliance. >> and shortly after that tweet, the president went further.
he said he wants the nato allies to double their spending on defense to 4% of gdp. is that realistic? is that attainable? >> of course, the united states doesn't do 4%, either. no, that's not realistic. the game plan is to get up to 2% by 2025. that's a realistic goal. let's stick with the current numbers. each of the nato countries are making progress towards that. i agree that they need to meet these numbers and do it in a pretty aggressive way. they are moving in that direction. let's continue the current policy. >> as you know, the time line for meeting the 2% target for all the nato allies that was imposed in 2014, it says they have to meet that target by 2024. given russian aggression in europe and elsewhere, should that time line move up? >> we've got to recognize, you're listening to the german ambassador talk about the percentage increases within their own country. when you're talking about significant increases in one
budget year, that's difficult for a country to be able to achieve economically and politically. so i think we have to have realistic progress. but it's got to be consistent, and it's got to reach its goals. we need to make sure we have adequate resources to defend nato partners. so clearly, we're being challenged, but let's stay on that projectry and all countries achieve their objective by 2024. >> as you know, the senate just voted 97-2. you were among the 97. to reaffirm america's commitment to nato. who should america's allies put their faith in right now? the u.s. congress or the president? >> well, i can tell you, it is just about unanimous in the congress that we believe in the nato alliance. we want to strengthen the nato alliance. america's national security is very much enhanced by the nato alliance. senate foreign relations committee approved the resolution that senator wicker and i authored by a vote of 20-1
in support of not only the current nato alliance, but saying we want to build on it with other countries that are qualified to enter. so i think there is by far strong congressional support for strengthening the transatlantic partnership in nato. the president gives mixed messages. but i think america understands how important that nato alliance is to our security. >> the two senators who voted against that resolution, senator lee, senator rand paul. that was that. everybody else voted in favor. senator ben cardin, thanks so much for joining us. >> good to be with you. paul manafort apparently hasn't been suffering in solitary confinement. his jail cell perks. tonight's manafort lawyers are pushing back. and the deputy attorney general makes an unusual request. why does rod rosenstein want prosecutors to help review the paper trail of the president's supreme court nominee? we had a vacation early in our marriage
that kinda put us in a hole. go someplace exotic? yeah, bermuda. a hospital in bermuda. a hospital in bermuda. what? what happened? i got a little over-confident on a moped. even with insurance, we had to dip into our 401(k) so it set us back a little bit. sometimes you don't have a choice. but it doesn't mean you can't get back on track. great. yeah, great. i'd like to go back to bermuda. i hear it's nice. yeah, i'd like to see it. no judgment. just guidance. td ameritrade. i'm a four-year-old ring bearer and now for the rings... with a bad habit of swallowing stuff. and if you don't have the right coverage, you could be paying for that pricey love band yourself. so get an allstate agent, and be better protected from mayhem. like me. ♪ who says summer gets all the fun? not us.
because southwest has $69 one-way sale fares for travel throughout september and october. so you can fill the rest of your year with amazing trips. from football games to reunions, or just a break from the office. these $69 one-way sale fares are ready to make your september and october a whole lot better. book now at southwest.com. low fares. no hidden fees. that's transfarency. if you have moderate to thsevere rheumatoid arthritis, month after month, the clock is ticking on irreversible joint damage. ongoing pain and stiffness are signs of joint erosion. humira can help stop the clock. prescribed for 15 years,
humira targets and blocks a source of inflammation that contributes to joint pain and irreversible damage. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. help stop the clock on further irreversible joint damage. talk to your rheumatologist. right here. right now. humira.
so how do i make the efforts of 8 employees... feel like 50? how can i share new plans virtually? how can i download an e-file? virtual tours? zip-file? really big files? in seconds, not minutes... just like that. like everything... the answer is simple. i'll do what i've always done... dream more, dream faster, and above all... now, i'll dream gig. now more businesses, in more places, can afford to dream gig. comcast, building america's largest gig-speed network. tonight a federal judge is ordering paul manafort to be transferred from his current jail cell where he's apparently been getting some vip treatment. the former trump campaign chairman had asked to stay where he was. our political correspondent, sara murray, is following the story for us. why didn't the judge grant manafort his request to simply stay put?
>> wolf, this battle over the location came because paul manafort's team had asked for a delay in the virginia trial. they were talking about how difficult it was for manafort to prepare for his trials in virginia and d.c. at the same time. and part of the reasoning, they said, was that this jail that he's in is two hours away from d.c. difficult to reach his legal team. so the judge said, okay, i'm going to move you to alexandria. paul manafort's legal team said, no, actually, we don't want to do this. which the judge called surprising and confusing. one of the reasons manafort's team gave was paul manafort's security. now, the judge apparently is not buying this explanation. here's what the judge had to say about that. the professionals at the alexandria detention center are very familiar with housing high-profile defendants, including foreign and domestic terrorists, spies and traitors. all of those defendants were housed safely there alexandria pending their respective trials at the alexandria detention center will presumably be no different. so you see the judge making the move to move paul manafort whether he wants it or not. >> cnn has learned that paul
manafort believes he was being treated like a vip. what can you tell us about his time in jail so far? >> that's right. this is what comes from a new filing from mueller's team, essentially saying, look, they can monitor paul manafort's calls while he's in jail. he apparently told one of his associates he feels like he's being treated like a vip in his living area. he has a private bathroom. he has a private shower. he has his own telephone. he also has a separate work space. mueller's team also points out that paul manafort has access to a laptop. they gave him an extension cord. he's also able to send e-mails. mueller's team says he's been sending more e-mails than he's allowed to thanks to a work-around, using a second computer thanks to his lawyer. he doesn't even have to wear a prison jumpsuit while in jail. manafort's legal team did not take to this kindly today. they issued their own sharply worded response in which they point out the special counsel doesn't seem to take a minute
and figure out why paul manafort in these phone calls with his loved ones might say he's getting better treatment than he actually is. might sound more chipper than he actually is. manafort's attorney says they are abiding by all the rules in this detention center when it comes to e-mails. and they took a swipe at special counsel's office saying they were laucavalier in dismissing challenges. >> thanks very much. let's get some analysis. jeffrey toobin, what's your reaction? give us your reaction to this latest maneuvering by paul manafort and his lawyers, and what does it say to you about the nature of this case? >> well, his lawyers are doing what good lawyers do. they are challenging the evidence in their case, and so far they have been unsuccessful, but that doesn't mean it isn't the right thing to do. it is a very unusual situation to have the same defendant awaiting trial in two separate jurisdictions. one trial stacked up right behind the other. it is also true that it does seem that paul manafort is getting a hell of a lot better treatment in jail than most
people awaiting trial do. so i expect this controversy to subside. i think it makes sense to put him in alexandria, which is where the trial is going to be. and the focus in a couple of weeks when the trials start will turn to the evidence, and that's when the case is really about. >> you know, gloria borger, special counsel to robert mueller, he went after what the prosecutors call manafort's vip lifestyle in solitary confinement. is this another hard ball tactic from mueller? >> look, bean bag. you know, as jeffrey points out, this is going to go back and forth and back and forth. and i think, you know, they were just pointing out that his living situation is not as terrible as you would think it is. and, you know, what was interesting to me today was that at one point, manafort said, well, i want to be in this prison, which is further away. then he changed his mind and -- no, he wanted to be closer. then he changed his mind and said, no, no, i really want to be further away. and they point out, well,
actually, that prison he's getting -- he's getting treated pretty well. and i think the judge was sort of frustrated by all of this. >> well, the attorneys overplayed their hand, right? as jeffrey said, the legal issues in the case are more important than the conditions of confinement. but, you know, it's like he gets sort of the -- if you will, the presidential suite at the further away jail, and then they try and bargain for, what, to get closer? to get released back to house arrest? and the judge clearly and mueller, as you say, gloria, had had enough. >> wolf -- >> and the attorneys, right? which makes some sense. but then he changed his mind. >> wolf, i don't like to use legalese too much. but it is worth remembering that being in jail sucks. it is terrible to be in jail. and paul manafort is having a bad time. that is not surprising. but that is true of virtually everyone who is in jail. that's why they call it jail. >> but you believe his security, his safety, would be endangered if he's moved to this jail in
alexandria, virginia, outside of washington? >> that seems so preposterous to me, as judge ellis pointed out. this is where zacarias moussaoui was tried. they have had all sorts of terrorist trials there. all sorts of very high-profile, very serious cases where people are looking at, you know, very lengthy -- his safety is not an issue as far as i can tell. >> rebecca berg, let's turn to developments in the confirmation fight for the president's nominee for the supreme court, brett kavanaugh. the deputy attorney general, rod rosenstein, is now asking prosecutors all over the country to help review what they described as documents related to judge kavanaugh. this looks to some like they're mixing politics with all of this. what's your analysis? >> right. well, looks that way, wolf, because this isn't usually how it's done. it's a break with what we have seen with past supreme court nominees. but the explanation from department of justice to some of our colleagues here at cnn is that this is a very different
nomination. in terms of the document requests they are getting and just the massive scope of documents that are responsive to those requests. brett kavanaugh, of course, worked in the george w. bush white house. they had e-mail in that white house. so there can be document requests for all of the e-mails concerning brett kavanaugh, and already the george w. bush library is telling cnn that there could be 1 million documents concerning brett kavanaugh. >> so david -- >> that are responsive to that request. >> so the white house has reason to be concerned, there potentially could be some red flags when they go back and review this entire record? >> to use the word that kavanaugh himself used in that minnesota law review article, if he has done something dastardly or even illegal that has turned up in these e-mails or records, maybe. short of that, if there is just something controversial or a legal opinion we're not already aware of, no, i don't think there is any trouble. i think republicans are going to vote for him and he will be confirmed. >> what could this could do is drag it out. and i think that's what
democrats want to do. when you have to go through at least 1 million documents, it takes time. and they're going to get more documents. and so i think that if the democrats want to sort of stretch out this and start the hearings later and potentially not have him on the bench, if he were to get approved by october 1, the documents is going to be a big deal for them. >> jeffrey, how unusual, if it is unusual, is all of this? >> you know, it is unusual. you know, when i was an assistant u.s. attorney and i was a criminal prosecutor, the idea that main justice would ask you to do something like this would strike a lot of people as bizarre. you know, it's your job as a prosecutor to fight crime, not to review, you know, political documents. you know, you can see the circumstances here might justify it. you know, his job at the white house was staff secretary. what the staff secretary does is process all the documents that go to the president of the united states. so it is a document-heavy job.
it doesn't surprise me there might be 1 million documents. if this is only a couple of weeks, i don't think it's a particular big deal. but it is sort of remarkable to think that these prosecutors will be taken away from fighting drugs and white collar crime to go what is largely a political task. >> and rebecca, is there any realistic chance the confirmation won't be achieved? >> well, absolutely. i mean, there are a number of things you could run into along the way. if there is something that comes out in these documents that is damaging, there could be, you know, some response that kavanaugh gives during the confirmation hearings that turns into a big controversy. now, is that likely? maybe not. because republicans have the votes. there could be some democrats who cross over to support kavanaugh, as well as they did with gorsuch, just a few -- a year ago. so the odds are in his favor, but anything can happen.
>> the republicans keep lisa murkowski, susan collins, it's over. >> right. but don't forget, we're also heading into a period during the mueller investigation where there is a question of whether the president could actually be subpoenaed to testify if he decides that he doesn't want to do it voluntarily. if they don't work out some kind of a deal. and that's another issue here that kavanaugh is going to have to face with democrats, because, of course, he's written about it so extensively, because he worked for ken starr. and when he worked for ken starr, he thought it was fine for a president to testify. but then he had kind of a conversion afterwards, and now thinks it's too much of a bother. so the question is, how are democrats going to handle that, and how will kavanaugh handle that? >> ken starr, the white water investigator. a lot of time investigating bill clinton when he was president of the united states. >> and he did the vince foster investigation. >> yes, he did. i remember that very, very vividly. all right, guys. stand by. just ahead, as many separated families are still waiting to be reunited, we're now hearing more
emotional stories from parents who are finally with their children once again. one mother says her son, though, didn't recognize her. and does president trump think it's harsh criticism of nato is part of the art of the deal? it's the ford summer sales event and now is the best time to buy. and check out the all-new ecosport. protect those who matter most, and make the summer go right with ford, america's best-selling brand. now during the ford summer sales event,
get 0% financing for 60 months on a huge selection of suv's. and for the first time ever get 0% financing for 60 months plus $1,000 ford bonus cash on the 2018 ecosport. crisp leaves of lettuce. freshly made dressing. clean food that looks this good. delivered to your desk. now delivering to home or office. panera. food as it should be.
pepsoriasis does that. panera. it was tough getting out there on stage. i wanted to be clear. i wanted it to last. so i kept on fighting. i found something that worked. and keeps on working. now? they see me. see me. see if cosentyx could make a difference for you- cosentyx is proven to help people with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis... ...find clear skin that can last. don't use if you're allergic to cosentyx. before starting cosentyx, you should be checked for tuberculosis. an increased risk of infections and lowered ability to fight them may occur. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms. or if you have received a vaccine or plan to. if you have inflammatory bowel disease, tell your doctor if symptoms develop or worsen. serious allergic reactions may occur. never give up. see me. see me. clear skin can last. don't hold back... ...ask your dermatologist if cosentyx can help you find clear skin that lasts.
does it look like i'm done? shouldn't you be at work? [ mockingly ] "shouldn't you be at work?" todd. hold on. [ engine revs ] arcade game: fist pump! your real bike's all fixed. man, you guys are good! well, we are the number-one motorcycle insurer in the country. -wait. you have a real motorcycle? and real insurance, with 24-hour customer support. arcade game: wipeout! oh! well... i retire as champion. game hog! champion.
their parents. we heard the health and human services secretary claim right here in "the situation room" that the process is a great act of generosity and charity for immigrant children. separated families, though, are angrily disputing that. let's go to ed lavandera. you've been seeing some of the reunions and also hearing some heartbreaking stories. >> reporter: yeah, emotional day of a few of the stories we've been able to gather of those families reunited. the last number we had, 38 children have been reunited with their families. that's far short of the 102 the federal government was mandated to have reunited by yesterday, almost 24 hours ago. and what's even more remarkable, wolf, despite our efforts to ask about how many more reunions have taken place, we have received no updates from the federal government today.
two fathers, one from guatemala, other from honduras, some of the few reunited in texas. pablo ortiz says separated from three-year-old son april 30th and only able to speak with him three times. he says they were going to deport me, since my child was here, i couldn't leave him. i wanted to take my child, how am i going to leave him? he's little. this man, only wanted to be identified at roger, said son taken in february. they took me by the arm, he says, took me by the shoulder to a small room. i saw when they took my child, there was really a small window. in arizona, rodriguez hugged and kissed his three-year-old son after separated 40 days. son has asked, daddy where were
you. described experience as nightmare. we're humans, not animals, he says. not only animals are separated from their child, how are humans to be separated from kid? trump administration says the process of reuniting the families is moving slowly in part because of efforts to verify that children are being placed with biological parents. secretary of health and human services says he's proud of the work they've done. >> one of the great acts of charity we're doing for unaccompanied kids something youled into the the country or crossed illegally. we just have to protect privacy. >> reporter: trauma seems far from over. three-year-old son didn't appear to know who she was. didn't recognize me. my joy turned to sadness. another said three-year-old
daughter cried for social worker and tried to escape mother's embrace, embrace many are still waiting for. expected back in court. judge in california that issued mandates. yesterday wondering why 63 couldn't have been reunited by yesterday. still no word on more than 35 children reunited across the border. >> heartbreaking stories, continued at 11:00. is president trump a captive to russia? talk about his slams on germany, nato, upcoming summit with vladimir putin. cnn's chris cuomo is standing by live. no measure is too extreme. the luxus lc and lc hybrid experience amazing at your lexus dealer.
(burke) so we know how to seen cover almost anything. even a "cactus calamity". (man 1) i read that the saguaro can live to be two hundred years old. (woman) how old do you think that one is? (man 1) my guess would be, about... (man 2) i'd say about two hundred. (man 1) yeah... (burke) gives houseplant a whole new meaning. and we covered it. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪
♪ ♪ i can do more to lower my a1c. because my body can still make its own insulin. and i take trulicity once a week to activate my body to release it, like it's supposed to. trulicity is not insulin. it comes in a once-weekly, truly easy-to-use pen. and it works 24/7. trulicity is an injection to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes when used with diet and exercise. don't use it as the first medicine to treat diabetes, or if you have type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. don't take trulicity if you or your family have medullary thyroid cancer, you're allergic to trulicity, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of a serious allergic reaction, a lump or swelling in your neck, or severe stomach pain. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases your low blood sugar risk. common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting,
at nato summit in brussels, some members deeply concerned about the potential danger to the alliance over the trump presidency. harsh criticism of crucial u.s. allies, joined by chris cuomo, anchor of "cuomo primetime," he's going after nato sternly. what is behind the latest barrage? negotiating tactic or reflection of the president's world view? >> sure would be nice to know, wouldn't it wolf? there's absence of insight here.
president doesn't share this type of thinking. his staff, surrogates and officials around him in the administration don't come on and talk about the things the way we would like. don't have press conferences the way we would like. thinking is a little bit of a mystery. timing is the biggest concern. is the president wrong to question the due diligence of other nato members in terms of coming up to the 2% model that i think is due in 2024, 2% spending of your own gross domestic product on your own defense. not wrong to question it, president obama and bush questioned it. but timing before the summit, sends most comfortable signal to putin and most distressing signal to nato. >> and singling out germany.
what do you make of calling them captives of russia? >> on the face of it, once again. what is he talking about? the fact that germany gets a large amount of natural gas and crude oil to a lesser extent from russia. that's true. there's also a pipeline being built planned to be direct from russia to germany, that has different concerns even here in the u.s. congress. that's true. however, to make the connection between the need for the resources and being a captive is very insulting to the german people and their government. for obvious reason, which angela merkel spoke to today in a very passionate way for her. again it raises question of why would you do this to the people you need the most? motto of the american military in europe is stronger together. nato is the bulwark that's kept
peace in the region since the cold war. >> chris cuomo, thank you very much. to our viewers, tune in later tonight, 9:00 p.m. eastern. i'm wolf blitzer, thanks for watching. erin burnett "outfront" starts right now. "outfront" next, trump at war, fighting multiple battles with allies around the world. can the damage be undone? plus mocking victims of sexual harassment, peddling conspiracy theories about the vaccines, audio from the wife of bill shai, white house communications director and top trump aide. thai cave rescue. diver that oversaw the operation is my guest tonight. good evening,
Uploaded by TV Archive on