tv CNN Tonight With Don Lemon CNN September 12, 2018 12:00am-1:00am PDT
coast. we're live with the breaking news on hurricane florence. a new forecast coming in right now for this monster storm that threatens 20 million people. hurricane florence still bearing down on the carolinas and the mid-atlantic coast where 1.5 million people have already been forced to flee. we've got a lot coming up on this for you. but let's get right to tom sater in the cnn weather center. tom, good evening to you. a new advisory has just come in. what can you tell us? >> we still have a massive category 4 florence here, and it hasn't even reached its peak yet, don. some updates i need to tell you about because it's such an active atlantic right now. while we are watching florence, authorities in texas now are watching what's happening off the yucatan. we could have a depression or a tropical storm in the next couple of days. so, you know, services are going to be spread out across the country. let's back up from yesterday and really tell you what's happened in the last couple of hours. early this morning, national hurricane center issued watches. once the watches are issued, we
get the updates every three hours. it did not take long for them to push right into a warning now, and that's from santee river, south carolina, up to duck, north carolina, including albermarle and pimlico. that means this is imminent. it's coming. the system is still massive. last night winds at 140, dropped this morning to 130 and it slowed down this morning. now it's speeding back up and back to 140, which means the system has lungs. it's exhaling, inhaling. most likely went through a little reorganization with the eye. it is barreling now still toward pretty much around the wilmington area. now, when we watch this, we have to understand this is much like katrina. when katrina moved into the gulf, it was a category 5. but when it went to new orleans, only a 2. but the damage was done because when it was a 5, this upwelling of water came with it, and it shoved was a record storm surge of 28 feet. that's the concern here. it's much different to have a
storm develop out here in open waters than just develop near the coast. so it's bringing water. now, this is what's different. in red here is the u.s. model. blue, which it's hard to see underneath it, is the journeuro model. yesterday and the day before, total disagreement. you can't see the blue. it's underneath. total agreement. now, this right now is at friday at 2:30 in the morning. what happens? does it make landfall? looks like it stays off coast. both of these models in agreement now, and that's friday at 11:00. so, again, let's get into more detail here and break it down. this is just the european model. let me explain. this is going to fluctuate over the next couple of days. until it gets closer, we're not going to know exactly what's going to happen. so the national hurricane center is poring through all this data and looking at more models than this. here's the resolution and the detail. the system moves towards wilmington as expected. this model is friday at 6:00 in the morning. don, it doesn't want to make
landfall. it comes really close. then it looks like it wants to shift down toward charleston. this is saturday at 10:00 at night. we go from 6:00 in the morning on friday to 10:00 at night, two full days here of this staying offshore. wave after wave of pounding of outer bands of that heavy surf that continues to move in with the surge. with that said, it then carries through. that's the european model. just two hours ago, the u.s. model agreed to this as well. so let's see what has changed with the national hurricane center's track now. they believe -- and we've got to stick with this. let's be consistent here. they kick it in still as a category 4. a little bit of a change because in the previous run, it had a strong 3 to a 4. no one's going to notice the difference. >> yeah. >> so don't pay attention to that category. but now coming right over wilmington, last night when i was with you, we saw this track about 50 miles to the north. it's now back over wilmington, but now they're trying to say will it make landfall? they believe it will, and they'll kick it inland a little bit. so that's the problem.
then they put the kink in coming to the south. no longer heading up to the north and parts of virginia. maybe panning around and then stalling in this area. it's still going to drop crazy amounts of rain, and the surge is getting higher. that was an update today, up to 13 feet. we believe that could be higher. >> either path, it's devastating. it's going to sit there, spin, bring water, storm surge. thank you very much, tom sater. we'll check back with you. appreciate the update. tom mentioned the national hurricane center. we're bringing in ed rappaport, the deputy director of the national hurricane center. ed, you know we have to meet on these occasions. i wish it was better news, but i hope people heed the warnings and get out. you have been tracking this storm all night. what is the best case or worst case scenario for those who are bracing for this hurricane? >> we're very concerned. it's a dangerous hurricane now, and it will be a dangerous hurricane at landfall. the details, as you've been talking about, won't be known for a while. but regardless of the exact time and exact location of the
landfall of the center, this is a very large storm. and so there is a significant area that's going to be at risk from storm surge, which is the greatest killer in hurricanes. what we've got shown here now is the area that's under a storm surge warning. that means life-threatening surge. as mentioned, 9 to 13 feet of inundation is possible along the coast and up some of the rivers. this entire area is at risk. the second risk -- second hazard we talked about before is with the slowing and stalling storm, we're going to have excessive rainfall along the coast and inland and upwards of 20 inches near the coast and a large area of virginia. north carolina could have five to ten inches of rain. and with the flooding that will occur due to that excessive rain. >> ed, let's talk more about this because we know florence could be a slow mover as tom said and as the forecasts have
predicted as it approaches the coast. how long could the hurricane stay around just pounding the carolinas? >> it could be last for on the order of 12 to 24, maybe 36 hours. again, those details aren't known. we do know it will slow down as it gets to the coast, and then probably move inland. but it will be a threat through the weekend for some areas in the southeast. >> you saw the two different tracks, ed, that tom talked about. he says about the european model and the american model and what have you. what is the difference in that either way you look at it, it is devastating for the carolinas, correct? >> that's right. as mentioned, the details of whether it slows just offshore, just onshore, or which way it turns when it gets there aren't going to matter in terms of what you're going to get in the way of rainfall and that storm surge. in any of those scenarios, we're going to wind up with
destructive wind and life-threatening storm surge and inland flooding. >> mr. rappaport, thank you so much. we appreciate your time. thank you for joining us here on cnn. now i want to turn now to virginia national guard spokesman cotton perier. he joins us now via the phone. thank you so much for joining us. we appreciate it. the virginia national guard bringing up to 1,500 soldiers. even if virginia doesn't take a direct hit, heavy rain, flooding is going to remain a real threat to you. how extensive could this damage be there? >> well, there's still a lot of uncertainty as your experts were just talking about. there's a lot that we don't know. so the approach that we've taken is to try to get some capability spread across the commonwealth to work with our multi-agency partners. we've got terrific first responders in the commonwealth, but in situations like this, they need some extra help. so that's what the virginia national guard is able to do.
>> so, cotton, in a storm of this magnitude, there's always the fear that people will not heed official warnings, that they're going to stay behind, stay in their homes. how much does that complicate the response for you? >> well, the hard work right now in terms of the notification, our partners in the virginia department of emergency management, the governor's office are trying to get the word out as best they can. the localities are giving messages. so for us, we've kind of got it easy right now compared to the tough job they have to get the word out and let people know how serious is. wile they're doing that, we're doing our preparation. so we've got our people in place. but as you've been talking about, people just need to listen. they need to understand how serious this storm is. they need to heed the warnings in their locality, follow the instructions that their emergency response officials are telling them to do, and make sure they're in a safe place. >> what do you say to people who aren't evacuating? >> i really don't have any information as far as what the
evacuation situation is. i know the governor has -- there's a zone that he's declared, you need to evacuate. they're getting the word out to folks, and all the emergency response officials in that area are doing everything they can to get people to places where they're going to be safe. >> what do you say to people who aren't doing it, though, who aren't heeding it? >> i'm not aware of anybody that is not heeding it. everything that i see, you know, from the information that we received, people are taking it seriously. they know that this is going to be, you know, something that we haven't seen in quite some time, and they need to make sure they're getting someplace safe. >> that's good news because we just had -- before this show, someone on saying, yeah, i'm not going to leave. but let's hope that everyone is doing exactly what you're saying and they are heeding the warnings. >> thank you. i appreciate you joining us. cotton puryear, thank you so much. >> thank you, don. joining me now is mayor brenda bethune of miryrtle beac
south carolina. mayor, we appreciate your time. we know it's busy for you. you've got lots of work ahead of you. this is really a monstrous storm gaining strength. how are you preparing there in myrtle beach? >> well, myrtle beach is practically a ghost town right now, which is pretty eerie. but we are prepared. we've been preparing since sunday, and our crews have been working diligently. and i think right now everybody is just trying to get some rest tonight before everything kicks in, and we will continue to work around the clock until the storm is over and well after. >> you have been -- you heard my conversation with mr. puryear before you, and i know you have been personally pleading with people all day to heed the evacuation warnings. are they listening? >> i hope they are. it seems as though they are. the issue with myrtle beach and the evacuation is, as you know, we see over 18 million visitors a year.
however, we do not have a major interstate to get people in and out, especially during an emergency. so that is why it is critical that people adhere to the warnings and get out of town quickly because of the time that it takes for people to evacuate. >> yeah, because that's really slowing things. i mean look at the roads there. and that often happens. people wait too long. one way in, one way out, and there you go. you're stuck, or there are not many ways out, and then you're stuck. mayor, what kind of state and federal resources are there for folks struggling to evacuate? where are they telling them to go? >> we have multiple shelters set up for our locals, for visitors. we have cleaned out our humane society and sent the animals there to safe shelters. we have shelters set up for our homeless community, which is so important. and we've also evacuated all of our medical facilities, nursing
homes, rehabilitation centers, et cetera. so we do have the resources for people. we are using school buses to get people to shelters if needed. so we do have the means to get people to safety. >> mayor, good luck to you. thank you. we appreciate your time. >> thank you so much. when we come back, "the washington post" is reporting now that paul manafort is now negotiating with the special counsel's office for a plea deal. what that could mean for the president, who only recently praised his former campaign chairman's unwillingness to break.
man: are unpredictable crohn's symptoms following you everywhere? it's time to take back control with stelara®. for adults with moderately to severely active crohn's disease, stelara® works differently. studies showed relief and remission with dosing every 8 weeks. woman: stelara® may lower the ability of your immune system to fight infections and may increase your risk of infections and cancer. some serious infections require hospitalization. before treatment, get tested for tuberculosis. before or during treatment, always tell your doctor if you think you have an infection or have flu-like symptoms or sores, have had cancer, or develop any new skin growths, or if anyone in your house
needs or recently had a vaccine. alert your doctor of new or worsening problems, including headaches, seizures, confusion and vision problems. these may be signs of a rare, potentially fatal brain condition. some serious allergic reactions can occur. do not take stelara® if you are allergic to any of its ingredients. man: are you fed up with crohn's symptoms following you? talk to your doctor today, and learn how janssen can help you explore cost support options. remission can start with stelara®.
paul manafort has resisted cooperating with the special counsel robert mueller and hammered his former deputy for doing so. but according to a new report in the "washington post," that may be changing. joining me now to discuss is cnn contributor john dean, former white house counsel for president nixon. good evening, sir.
so let's talk about this new report tonight. "the washington post" is reporting that former trump campaign chairman paul manafort is in talks with mueller's office about a possible plea deal. you know, this comes as jury selection for manafort's second trial was delayed until friday. this could be a huge development. what do you think of this? >> well, let me refresh your recollection because i'm sure you will remember that during the jury deliberations over in virginia, manafort's lawyers talked to the special counsel's office then about arranging a plea deal. and those broke off, so this is really a resumption of talks that have broken down. and i think manafort's probably in financial trouble and trying to cut his costs. >> let's talk about how you read this because the president praised manafort, remember, for standing up to mueller. there's been a lot of reporting that manafort might be hoping for a pardon from the president. so how do you read this move
here? >> well, i read it as he's trying probably to negotiate a lighter sentence or lighter crime if he agrees to plea and saves the government the trouble of going through this second trial and seeing the best he can do on that. i don't see any" he indication willing to cooperate with the special counsel at this point. i think it's where they broke down before. and i suspect unless he's ready to cooperate, they'll break down again. >> are you surprised by this, or did you see it coming? >> i was surprised the talks broke down originally because i think they were feeling their oats. the jury was out. they thought they put on a good case. then they got hit with eight counts they were indicted on, and they've got ten that they were mistrialed on, that the government could come back at them again. so he's in a heap -- he's in a world of hurt. >> let's talk about this anonymous "new york times" op-ed
because donald trump jr. was asked about that, about this in an interview. watch this. >> it's pretty disgusting. that's pretty sad. perhaps it's a disgruntled person who's been thrown out because they didn't deliver. >> what's the crime? >> i think you're subverting the will of the people. to try to control the presidency while not the president, you have millions and millions of americans who voted for this. >> subverting the will of the people, that's not a real crime. >> that's some variation of sedition, which is talking about the king in foul terms, and we don't do that here. i think that's really what he wants is a sedition crime. but i don't think it's going to ever happen. >> he also said in that interview that he wasn't afraid of going to jail because he knows that he hasn't committed any crimes. he hasn't done anything wrong. from what we know of his involvement in planning the trump tower meeting, should he be concerned? >> he could very well be a
co-conspirator, don, because there's no question that meeting took place. there's no question that the russians made a proffer of some kind. there's no question what's in those e-mails, and there was an effort to hide what had really happened in the meeting on air force one when they were putting out a statement, when "the new york times" was about to report it. so, yes, he's not -- his hands are not clean at this point. >> so the new book, bob woodward's book i'm talking about, "fear" released today. despite the public pushback from the trump administration, woodward said he is hearing something different in private. >> one key person who is in office called me ask said, everyone knows what you've said here is true. it's 1,000% correct. and then this person has said some public things that contradict that. >> because of watergate, you know this from experience.
how much do these public denials mean, if anything? >> not very much. we know that mark felt, his principal source for watergate, or one of his key sources, deep throat, was putting out public denials and came within a hair's breadth of doing it in front of a grand jury when the prosecutor stopped and whispered in his ear, maybe he wanted to think twice before he denied it in front of a grand jury. so i don't think we can take him seriously. i think we should take seriously, though, bob woodward's reporting. he's done eight or nine presidents now. his reporting has held up over the years. i'm about ten chapters into the book. it's a better read than i thought it would be. so i think this book's going to emerge, and he's on the right side of history, and he's disclosing what i think is really just book one of a multi-volume set. >> yeah. well, i'm behind because i haven't started it yet. but, you know, good luck. i will start soon.
thank you, john dean. i appreciate your time. >> thank you, don. make sure you stay with cnn, everyone, for the very latest on hurricane florence, okay? stay tuned because we have a lot more. we're going to keep you posted on that. when we come back, though, tonight on the 17th anniversary of 9/11, a new assessment of the dangers of terror attacks. i'm going to ask fareed zakaria would our allies still come to our aid today like they did after 9/11? can be relentless. tremfya® is for adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. i'm ready. with tremfya®, you can get clearer. and stay clearer. in fact, most patients who saw 90% clearer skin at 28 weeks stayed clearer through 48 weeks. tremfya® works better than humira® at providing clearer skin,
and more patients were symptom free with tremfya®. tremfya® may lower your ability to fight infections and may increase your risk of infections. before treatment, your doctor should check you for infections and tuberculosis. tell your doctor if you have an infection or have symptoms such as: fever, sweats, chills, muscle aches or cough. before starting tremfya® tell your doctor if you plan to or have recently received a vaccine. ask your doctor about tremfya®. tremfya®. because you deserve to stay clearer. janssen wants to help you explore cost support options. join t-mobile, and get netflix included for the whole family. so you can get lost in space in your own backyard. or get pumped up for your grand entrance. t-mobile lets you watch your favorite movies and shows in more places, without paying more. get an unlimited family plan with netflix on us. and right now at t-mobile, buy one samsung galaxy s9 and get one free.
a new assessment from the department of homeland security finds that coordinated planned attacks by a terrorist organization remain a more deadly threat than a lone wolf style attack. that on the 17th anniversary of the september 11 attacks when we relied on our allies in nato to stand by us. would they still stand by us today? that's a good question. fareed zakaria, thank you so much for joining us. after 9/11, article 58 in nato was invoked the first and only time in america's defense. let's put this up from great britain, a commitment of 4200
soldiers, germany, 3,900. italy 2,700. president trump has been really hard on nato and the alliances. the alliance is strained. do you think they would respond the same way today? >> well, first i think underscore how extraordinary it was. as you said, first time in the history of nato, article 5, which says an attack on one is an attack on all, is invoked. not clear that it needed to be invoked. after all, britain had suffered terrorist attacks. germany had. but all the other nato countries came to our aid and offered, you know, how can we help? when we declared war on afghanistan, they all came in. germany sending troops. remember, germany has really been reluctant to send troops because of its history. so all these countries, i mean you're up to 30, 40 countries participating. many of them then show up in iraq as well. many of them disagreed with the mission privately and showed up. so the question you asked is would they still show up? i actually think they would
because these are mature, grown-up countries that understand that the atlantic alliance is the foundation of global stability and order. my question is, what about the other side of that? that's the real worry. i was in europe, and the real worry is what if something actually did happen? what if vladimir putin launched a massive cyberattack on latvia, lithuania, or estonia, the baltic republics that he believes should be part of russia? would donald trump invoke article 5? would he come to the aid of europe, of european countries, in precisely the manner that the united states had promised to do for 70 years. >> that's a very good question because after the nato summit earlier this summer, this is what the president said about article 5 on fox news. watch this. >> membership in nato obligates the members to defend any other member that's attacked. so let's say montenegro -- why
should my son go to montenegro to defend it from attack in. >> i understand what you're saying. i've asked the same question. montenegro is a tiny country with very strong people. >> i'm not against montenegro or albania. >> by the way, they're very strong people. they're very aggressive people. they may get aggressive. and congratulations, you're in world war iii. >> so as it happens, as it happens, three weeks ago i was in montenegro. >> okay. >> and i had lunch with the president of montenegro. and i asked him about this. and he said the whole idea that we would drag the world into world war iii -- i mean it's the united states that is launching military actions all over the world. it's the united states that, you know, has 3,000 nuclear missiles. we're sitting here trying to preserve our independence. and the point he makes is it's not about us. it's never been about us. but if the russians -- and he was very clear that is where the threat to europe comes from.
if the russians were to start attacking small, vulnerable european countries, what is the lesson of the 20th century? that that is a very dangerous world to be in, and you are much better off stopping it early than doing something much later on when the problem becomes a much larger conflict. so the way to prevent a large-scale global war is to deter and respond at the earliest provocations rather than waiting for the conflagration to grow. you know, his view was putin has decided that he's going to try to seek to undermine europe and undermine the west in every way he can. he's going to push wherever he can. and so far he's not getting a lot of resistance from the united states. >> well, the reason i laugh is because i'm just -- i'm just flummoxed by the level of discourse even with that exchange. it's -- i'm like, that is an interview with the president of the united states, and that is what they're talking about and
discussing. it's mind-boggling. >> what's mind-boggling is it is undermining the credibility of the nato. it's undermining the credibility of this kind of platform that keeps global peace and stability. it's one thing to have concerns that you privately express to your cabinet officials, to your national security council and say, how should we manage this? but on fox with tucker carlson you start musing about maybe we shouldn't be honoring our -- you know, this is an obligation the united states has had since the formation of nato. suddenly the president says, maybe we shouldn't do it. >> it's not just in that forum because attacking nato has been a consistent theme for this president on the campaign and as the president. watch this. >> number one, nato is obsolete. and, number two, the people aren't paying their way. it's obsolete, and we pay too much money. nato, we're going to have the people that aren't paying, they're going to start paying. it's obsolete.
we're getting ripped in nato. they don't pay their bills. they are delinquent. nato is obsolete and has to be rejiggered. >> can you make sense of this? and when our allies hear that, it has to do damage, no? >> of course it does damage. and, you know, it's important to point out that this sort of fundamentally misunderstands the problem. >> right. >> donald trump has increased defense spending. he believes that the united states is not spending enough money on defense. and then he goes around saying the nato -- it's very expensive for us because the nato countries aren't paying. which is it? does he want to spend more on defense, or does he want to spend less on defense? if you were to bring back troops from nato countries, for example, unless he plans on then, you know, firing all those troops, he's going to have to house them in the united states, which by the way will be more expensive because germany pays a part of the costs. it houses those troops for free.
it provides them with facilities for free. we'd have to do all that ourselves. so we would actually lose money if we did what he was -- >> why doesn't he sit down for an interview with you or someone who is going to channel him like that and say, listen, i got to ask you this. >> he mentions it about south korea every time, and every time i patiently try to point out, it would be -- it's cheaper to keep them in south korea than it is to keep them in ft. bragg. >> this is from a portion of an op-ed. bob woodward's new book -- make plain that behind trump's ranting, impulsive, incoherent facade lies a ranting, impulsive, incoherent man. what does it do to our standing and opinion of the united states? i hear it from people, like what are you guys doing? what's happening? >> look, the united states has
always been the grown-up in the room. if you think about the times the europeans have objected to an american president and people often bring up ronald reagan, it's entirely true. the europeans were upset with reagan. but it's important to remember what the issue was. reagan was trying to be more internationalist, more aggressive against the soviet union. he was trying to defend the western project more than the europeans were. he was saying, you guys are too soft on the soviets. you aren't deploying enough missiles. i want to do more, more, more. what you have here is a donald trump who says i don't believe in the western project. i don't believe in nato. i don't believe in the western alliance. what is nato? nato is the alliance of western democracies that have held together and tried to maintain peace and maintain a climate for the preservation of democracy and liberty and human rights. he's saying, i don't believe in this stuff. that is a much more damaging posture than reagan, who was
sort of saying, i believe in this more than you guys do. you're not doing -- you know, you're not doing enough. i want to confront the evil soviet union more. so this is the first time in 70 years we have had an american president who doesn't believe in the american project. this has been, after all, america's foreign policy project for 70 years, ever since the end of world war ii. so that's a much bigger deal than even the circus around it. i mean there have been circuses in the past, nothing quite like this to be sure. and it worries me because i think that that's the part of it that might last. some of this -- the circus will go away. but the sense that the united states has lost faith in its own creation, that will linger, and people will start substituting. they'll start freelancing. then you're in a very different world. >> fareed zakaria, thank you so much. don't miss gps sunday 10:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. thank you, sir. i appreciate it. when we come back, mitch
yep. and you're retiring at 67? that's the plan! it's also a great time to learn about an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. here's why...medicare part b doesn't pay for everything. this part is up to you. a medicare supplement plan helps pay for some of what medicare doesn't. call unitedhealthcare insurance company today to request this free decision guide. and learn about the only medicare supplement plans endorsed by aarp. selected for meeting their high standards of quality and service. this type of plan lets you say "yes" to any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. do you accept medicare patients? i sure do! so call unitedhealthcare today and ask for your free decision guide. oh, and happy birthday... or retirement... in advance.
senator mitch mcconnell warning that republicans could lose in the senate in november. the majority leader says at least nine races are dead even. >> all of them too close to call, and every one of them like a knife fight in an alley. i mean just a brawl in every one of those places. i hope when the smoke clears, that we'll still have a majority in the senate. >> mcconnell is talking about arizona, florida, indiana, missouri, montana, nevada, north dakota, tennessee, and west virginia. so let's discuss now. cnn political analyst april ryan is here. she's the author of "under
fire: reporting from the front lines of the trump white house." also republican strategist rick wilson, and someone political commentator and former trump campaign adviser steve cortes who loves to read his twitter feed after his appearances on the show, i'm sure. >> that's right. >> i look at it sometimes afterwards. boy, oh, boy. you're a brave man. thank you all for joining us. good evening to you. rick, does mcconnell really think the senate is up for grabs, or is he just trying to motivate voters? i'm not saying he's fearmongeri fearmongering, but is he trying to motivate them by scaring them a little bit in. >> i think he's trying to juice some of the donor class to kicking in for the last 50 days or so. i do think he's got legitimate concerns about the way the field looks right now. there were some races they thought were going to be ease walk-aways, especially in west virginia, north dakota. they thought they had, you know, arizona was going to swing into
position and mcsally would take a clear lead, and those haven't worked out quite like they hoped. there's a lot of hope for republicans with rick scott in florida because he's got a financial advantage over bill nelson, but their polling has remained stubbornly tied. the majority leader is correct that the polling is locked up in a lot of these states inside the margin. the problem for the republicans is they live or die by donald trump, and the problem for the democrats is a lot of them don't quite have -- you know, a lot of them are in red states that aren't the easiest places for them to run. >> a knife fight, steve, in an alley? how worried should republicans be about the midterms? >> you know, i think he's exaggerating. first of all, i'm very worried about the house in the midterms. as a matter of fact, right now i'd say we're going to lose the house. the senate i'm not worried about at all. i think mcconnell right now is acting like a lot of football coaches do. lou holtz used to do this for notre dame. when they were at the height of their power, they would be
playing slippery rock state -- i think that's what mcconnell is doing here which is smart. he should try to rally the troops, to shake the trees for donation. but the math just happens by luck, just works very favorably in the republicans' favor this time. the democrats are defending ten states that trump won, five of them that he won by double digits. the odds they can hold all ten of those are extremely low, and they have to hold all ten if they have a reasonable chance of getting the majority. >> gee golly, that's going to motivate them. >> that's what holtz used to say. >> golly gee, get some points on the board. april, listen, mcconnell also admits that texas senator ted cruz, can you imagine if ted cruz loses? he's facing a competitive race against democratic challenger congressman beto o'rourke. a text senate seat hasn't gone to a democrat in 25 years.
this race is getting tight in, i mean, flaming red texas. >> flaming red texas too can be in trouble right now in the midst of this movement. what is this? we are still finding it out. i mean, don, i'm going to be honest with you. ever since president trump won, i really take polls with a grain of salt when it comes to predicting elections. look what happened with pressley in massachusetts. look what's happening in florida, maryland, and georgia when it comes to the governorship, things that we haven't seen before. there is a disease in this nation and a discontent just like barack obama after he -- his eight years, this president came into being as a direct result of those who did not want obama. let's just call it for what it is. now people -- and the common thread between obama and trump was the word "change." people wanted change. people are trying to figure out,
you know, this thing is broken. let's fix it. they don't know exactly what it is, but they want something new. and there is this percolating discontent. and this president is very concerned about the fact, just like steve, he believes that the house is going to go. he already believes they're going to lose the house. he's very upset about that. but let's see what happens in the senate. and for ted cruz to be in jeopardy, for an incumbent to be in jeopardy, a man who wanted to run for president, that is huge in the words of president trump. >> interesting. okay. we're going to discuss more, and we're going to talk about something i'm sure steve wants to talk about this bob woodward book more than anybody on this panel. we'll give him and the rest of our panelists the opportunity right after this. >> fear, fear! >> fear. we'll be right back.
of great savings and service. with such a long history, it's easy to trust geico! thank you todd. it's not just easy. it's-being-a-master-of-hypnotism easy. hey, i got your text- sleep! doug, when i snap my fingers you're going to clean my gutters. ooh i should clean your gutters! great idea. it's not just easy. it's geico easy. todd, you will go make me a frittata.
a source close to the white house is telling cnn that the trump administration applied a lot of pressure on former trump officials rob porter and gary cohn to discredit bob woodward's new book. both cohn and porter released statements. back with me now, april ryan, rick wilson, steve cortes. speaking of this book and "the new york times" anonymous op-ed, i'm going to write a book called "it wasn't me." but anyways, i digress. somebody should. they should get it out real fast. april, a separate source close to the white house also tells cnn they are pushing anyone who is remotely associated with this book to discredit the information. why is this white house so obsessed with this book? i remember bob woodward writing books on other administrations, and i know they weren't this obsessed with it. >> well, first of all, even before we start, i'm going to say bob woodward has got a winner. i mean just off of the fact that
bob woodward was one of the reporters who was involved in telling the truth and exposing watergate. and it's the same scenario today as it was back then. you have a president trying to discredit a reporter who is finding the truth and telling the truth, and ultimately there could have been impeachment hearings, but nixon resigned. look what's happening now. just on a side note, tonight i had my own book event and i started the event off saying, hi, my name is bob woodward, and the crowd roared. you cannot buy this. i mean bob woodward, really, for real, he has the gravitas of being this incredible journalist who digs for the truth. and this president and this white house is -- they're afraid. they're afraid of the truth. >> i'm short on time, april. >> the president knows intrinsically that people are talking. the president knows it. >> i want to get everybody in before we run out of time. steve, rob porter says the book
is selective, often misleading. gary cohn says the book does not accurately portray his experience at the white house, but they're not denying these specific stories. why not? it's sort of a non-denial denial but why aren't they denying spefngs? >> they didn't, and i'm not sure why, but both generals did, and that's what i care more about. general kelly and general mattis. >> that was a good pivot, steve. i asked you about porter and cohn, but you -- >> i said i don't know why. >> that was a good pivot. >> no. i answered your question, which is i don't know why they weren't more specific m their denials. this idea that bob woodward is somehow infalinfallible, look, because he was a great journalist way back when eight-track players were popular in cars. >> he still is. >> if we look at his track record of books, it is spotty at best. if you look at his john belushi book, if you look at the things he said about vail, about bob
casey, thoroughly discredited. >> let me tell you. this president had his share -- hold on. >> the idea that he is an infallible journalist is simply not true. and i for one am going to take the word of general kelly and general mattis -- >> i got short time. i want to bring in rick in. i have very short time here. rick, listen. infallible and credibility, those are two separate words with separate definitions. >> bob woodward's has chronicled nine presidents and i've watched this as i've been in politics for 30 years now. and everyone speaks to bob woodward. they know that he is the first draft of history. every bitches and complains and says he got the story wrong. he got this detail -- the guy goes back. he does dozens of interviews with all these principals, and the people that deny it are embarrassed in the end. everybody makes mistakes, but the scope of bob woodward's work, the overall content of his work has proven to be an incredibly infallible guide to
presidential history. he's had an insight into the operations of the oval office, and when he looks at this one as the most chaotic and dangerous he's seen, i believe him. >> i got ten seconds if you want to respond to that. steve or april. >> look, i would say this. i do think that when you talk about the scope, i do believe this is happening. i believe there's a cabal of crony insiders within the administration, yes, who are working to thwart. president. we know that from "the new york times" op-ed, and i implore the president to take action against those people who are trying to nullify the will of the people from 2016. you can laugh, but it's very real, and it's very dangerous because the permanent political clash is real and it's fighting this president even from the inside. >> we should ask john barron -- >> thank god. >> about the sources or david dennison. i couldn't help myself. thanks, y'all! our coverage continues. good night. >> good night. drive safely...
with drivewise. it lets you know when you go too fast... ...and brake too hard. with feedback to help you drive safer. giving you the power to actually lower your cost. unfortunately, it can't do anything about that. now that you know the truth... are you in good hands? i'm ray and i quit smoking with chantix. i tried to quit smoking for years on my own. i couldn't do it. i needed help. for me, chantix worked. it did. chantix, along with support, helps you quit smoking. chantix, without a doubt, reduced my urge to smoke. when you try to quit smoking, with or without chantix, you may have nicotine withdrawal symptoms. some people had changes in behavior or thinking, aggression, hostility, agitation, depressed mood, or suicidal thoughts or actions with chantix. serious side effects may include seizures,
new or worse heart or blood vessel problems, sleepwalking or allergic and skin reactions which can be life-threatening. stop chantix and get help right away if you have any of these. tell your healthcare provider if you've had depression or other mental health problems. decrease alcohol use while taking chantix. use caution when driving or operating machinery. the most common side effect is nausea. i don't think about cigarettes anymore. talk to your doctor about chantix. man: are unpredictable crohn's symptoms following you everywhere? it's time to take back control with stelara®. for adults with moderately to severely active crohn's disease, stelara® works differently. studies showed relief and remission with dosing every 8 weeks. woman: stelara® may lower the ability of your immune system to fight infections and may increase your risk of infections and cancer. some serious infections require hospitalization. before treatment, get tested for tuberculosis. before or during treatment, always tell your doctor if you think you have an infection or have flu-like symptoms or sores, have had cancer, or develop any new skin growths,
or if anyone in your house needs or recently had a vaccine. alert your doctor of new or worsening problems, including headaches, seizures, confusion and vision problems. these may be signs of a rare, potentially fatal brain condition. some serious allergic reactions can occur. do not take stelara® if you are allergic to any of its ingredients. man: are you fed up with crohn's symptoms following you? talk to your doctor today, and learn how janssen can help you explore cost support options. remission can start with stelara®.
a book that you're ready to share with the world? get published now, call for your free publisher kit today! hurricane florence, there it is, going strong as a category-four storm. the national weather service warning, quote, unbelievable damage. >> i think that puerto rico was in an incredible, unsung success. >> president trump slammed for saying the response to the hurricane in puerto rico was a success. there were nearly 3,000 deaths in the aftermath there. wondering if this is a heck