happening now, breaking news. placing blame. saudi arabia is reportedly pinning blame for the killing of dissident journalist jamal khashoggi on a top saudi intelligence official close to the crown prince. tonight president trump is speaking out about the suspected murder. pushing back, the justice department pushes back against the idea with special counsel robert mueller needs to wrap up his russia investigation soon. we're learning new information about when it might conclude. moving the fbi. democrats say they were misled about president trump's involvement in scrapping a plan to move agency headquarters. did the president intervene to protect one of his hotels? and base play. partisan politics. heating up with the midterm election less than three weeks away. we'll get a preview of tonight's cnn texas senate town hall where one of the candidates declined

to appear. we want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer. you're in ""the situation room." >> this cnn breaking news. >> breaking news tonight in the apparent killing of dissident saudi journalist and "washington post" columnist jamal khashoggi. "the new york times" is reporting that saudi officials are considering blaming the murder on a top saudi intelligence official close to crown prince mohammed bin salman. a short time ago, president trump said it certainly looks like khashoggi is dead and said consequences for saudi arabia will, quote have, to be severe. we're going to talk about the breaking news with congressman mike quigley. he is a key member of the house intelligence committee and our correspondents, analysts and specialists are also standing by. let's go to our chief white house correspondent jim acosta. he is in missoula, montana for

us where president trump will be holding another political rally later tonight. jim, the president took a somewhat harder stance on the khashoggi killing as he left washington, but he still wants to give the saudis more time to investigate themselves. >> that's right, wolf. he is moving in that direction. the president on his way to a rally here in montana later on this evening. just before he left washington, he told reporters he is starting to acknowledge what has been suspected for days, even weeks is that the saudis appear to have murdered, viciously murdered one of its own journalist, jamal khashoggi. the president said he is willing to give the saudis time to explain exactly what happened but woompbd severe consequences if the saudis were in fact behind khashoggi's murder. on his way to a campaign rally in montana, president trump finally stated what was apparent to much of the world, that missing saudi journalist jamal khashoggi is dead. >> do you believe jamal khashoggi is dead? >> it certainly looks that way to me. it's very sad.

it certainly looks that way. >> reporter: the president vowed there would be consequence if saudi arabia is found responsible. >> will have to be very severe. it's bad, bad stuff. but we'll see what happens. >> reporter: nearly three weeks after the disappearance of jamal khashoggi, the trump administration wants to give saudi arabia even more time to explain what happened to the journalist, who appears to have been brutally murdered by operatives tied to riyadh. >> i told president trump this morning that we ought to give them a few more days to complete that so that we too have a complete understanding of the facts surrounding that. >> reporter: the administration is hinging its response on the impending saudi report, which critics worry is more likely to provide cover for the saudi crown prince than be a full accounting of what happened to khashoggi. >> all of luis get a chance to make a determination with respect to the credibility that went into that whether it's truly, accurate, fair and transparent in the way they made a personal commitment to me and the crown prince also made a

personal commitment to the president when he spoke to him. >> reporter: after meeting with president trump, secretary of state mike pompeo stressed ties to saudi leaders who are facing mounting accusations of a cover-up. >> i think it's important for us all to remember too we have a long, since 1932, a long strategic relationship with the kingdom of saudi arabia. >> reporter: still, the administration is taking steps to distance itself from the kingdom with treasury secretary steve mnuchin announcing he won't be traveling to saudi arabia for a global investment summit later this month. democrats argue that's not nearly enough and accuse the white house of trying to block lawmakers from finding out what happened to the journalist. >> it appears you've got an administration that wants to shut down our own intelligence agency and not let them tell members of congress what's going on so that president trump can continue to be the mouthpiece which is what he has become for the saudi regime and its denials. >> reporter: the president appears to be eager to get back to campaigning for upcoming elections, and he has put his finger on the issue he wants to run on.

a caravan of hundreds of central american migrants making their way to the u.s./mexico border. mr. trump tweeted a warning if the caravan continues its journey, he will halt foreign aid and may freeze the new agreement with canada and mexico, adding in addition to stopping all payment to the countries which seem to have almost no control over their population, i must in the strongest of terms ask mexico to stop this onslaught. and if unable to do so, he will call up the u.s. military and close our southern border. for the president, playing the immigration card comes right out of the campaign playbook as former trump strategist told steve bannon's fareed zakaria. >> you're going to see more of this, more of the central beating heart issues. immigration is certainly going to be one. >> reporter: but others like congressman mark meadows insist the president should not take the blame if the gop loses the house come november. >> i don't think he should take the blame. i can tell you, any place he goes he gets unbelievable support.

>> now, as for the case of jamal khashoggi, the president's son-in-law, jared kushner is said to be urging caution to mr. trump as to how to handle the whole a situation, and the president appears to be taking that advice. wolf, we understand there are conversations going on inside the white house as to what might happen to the region. if the u.s. comes down too hard on the saudis, but wolf, of course, there is a flip side to all of this and that is the u.s. will be sending a very big message to the world as to where it stands on human rights, where it stands on press freedom, depending on how the president deals with the fallout of the murder of jamal khashoggi. >> john costa, thank you so much for that report. also breaking tonight, we're learning about a very heated argument between the white house chief of staff john kelly and the president's national security adviser john bolton that had aides speculating one of these two men might resign. our white house correspondent kaitlan collins has been working this story. you're getting new information from your source. tell us about it. >> it got ugly today in the west wing. that's what happened.

they were having a a conversation about this surge in border crossings, something we know president trump has been so incensed about to the fact that he is threatening to shut down the southern border. but it got really ugly between the chief of staff john kelly and the national security adviser john bolton. they started off this argument in front of president trump in the oval office while talking about this, and then it turned into a shouting match between the two of them, so loud that it was startling aides near who are used to lat of arguing in a pretty divisive west wing. that's how bad it was. it raise as question of why would the two men be arguing like this in this dramatic fashion over something like this, but we're told by sources who are familiar with the argument that john bolton insulted kerstin nelson saying she needs to start doing her job, and that's a sentiment that president trump agreed with during this argument, causing a lot of people to believe that president trump had taken john bolton's side. the reason that infuriated john kelly and set him off in this argument is that kerstin nelson

is his right-hand woman. she was in the west wing with him for a while and he was the one who persuaded president trump to nominate her as the secretary to lead the department of homeland security. it was a really ugly fight there are a lot of fights in this west wing, but what happened today essentially led people to believe that one of them was going to be leaving, and they didn't hit the was john bolton, who went about with his afternoon with his regularly scheduled meetings, while people did not see john kelly and they thought he would resign over this. he is someone who has threatened to resign over fights with president trump before. this was such an ugly fight that it made people think that it made people think he could be gone. the white house did not offer us a statement earlier when we reported on this. but they have sent out a statement to the pool reporters, sarah sanders saying while we are passionate about solving the issue of illegal immigration, we are not angry at one another. however, we are furious at the failure of congressional democrats to help us address this growing crisis. so she is trying to play down

this feud that happened today, but, wolf, the people who witnessed it certainly say it's not like normal fights. they equated to it a falling out between the two men and said they just do not see how they can move forward working together after something like this. >> apparently was profanity-laced, right? >> that's right. it got really ugly. that's not atypical for a fight in the west wing. but to have the national security adviser and the chief of staff going at each other's throats with president trump involved in this, and taking sides is extraordinary, even for this white house. >> great reporting. thank you very much for that. kaitlan doing an excellent job for us. there is more breaking news on the special counsel. robert mueller's russia investigation, and when it might actually conclude. our political correspondent sara murray is joining us right now. i take it we're getting new information from a key source? >> that's right. our colleague laura jarrett spoke to a source familiar with the investigation in the justice department who says that rod rosenstein has not set any kind of specific date for special counsel robert mueller to wrap up his investigation, but it is

expected to wind down by the end of the year. now, that does not mean that this is suddenly going to wrap up as soon as the midterms are over there will be more investigation that continues after that. and this source wanted to make clear that rosenstein is not placing any pressure on mueller to speed things up, to wrap things up, for instance, the day after the midterms. >> mueller's questioning of former trump campaign chairman paul manafort, sarah, is still ongoing. manafort is due back in a federal courtroom tomorrow. so what's expected, first of all, at this court proceeding? >> manafort was convicted of a number of crimes. so they're expected to lay out sort of a timeline for paul manafort's sentencing. we've seen sort of a change in tune from mueller's tune. prosecutors wanted to wait to sentence manafort until the bulk of his cooperation is over, now they say they're open to sentencing him now. and one of the lingering questions is what's going to happen to the ten outstanding counts paul manafort was facing.

remember, there was a mistrial. they're not really ready to drop them yet. we'll how this plays out in a courtroom tomorrow. >> we will indeed. thank you, sara murray reporting. let's get more on this. mike quigley of illinois is joining us. he is a member of the intelligence committee. congressman, thanks for joining us. >> thank you. busy day. >> it appears that a source is pushing back on the idea that the idea that robert mueller is face anything sort of pressure on the timeline of his investigation. what do you make of that? >> yeah, i think that the special counsel has feltz pressure all along. i don't believe that there is no pressure. obviously, we've seen the administration pressure beyond comprehension. the justice department, the fbi, i believe that mr. muellerer absolutely believes he has a time pressure. who knows what takes place after the midterms. we've heard many republican congressional leaders suggest that, well, he shouldn't fire mr. session or anybody else until after the midterms.

hey, if it's the wrong thing to do, it's the wrong thing to do now or after the midterms. let's remember, the watergate investigation took please 28 months from the day of the break-in to the time that the president left. this is a far more complicated investigation, and frankly, a far more important one. >> the deputy attorney general rod rosenstein has spoken out, strongly defending the mueller investigation, but he and the attorney general jeff session might not necessarily be all that safe after the midterm elections in 19 days. do you think mueller needs to wrap up his work to get ahead of president trump's possibly replacing the people who will decide what happens with mueller's final report? >> i think that's exactly what mr. mueller feels. i think it's unfortunate. it's a great concern. i'd like to think that he will have more time afterwards. i think some of this will depend on the outcome of the elections. this should be what the american public is considering when they

go to the polling place. there is some real truth to the old adage that absolute power corrupts absolutely. republicans had not shown the responsibility to investigate this white house and the russia investigation thoroughly. the house republicans have shut down the investigation. so be in mind of this, folks. this stuff really matters. republicans haven't shown the willingness to truthfully find out what took place. >> the former vice president joe biden said he hopes democrats don't try to impeach president trump. do you agree? >> i think he's absolutely right. i've told my colleagues all along if we're telling the republicans to let mr. mueller complete his investigation before we even consider such discussion we should do the very same. let this investigation complete its course, and that includes the house investigation opening up again, because it has

different purposes, different stated purposes. and at that, when the report is done, and we look at both, and we see what the details are, then if it is appropriate, we'll talk about such things. but right now let's let this investigation take its course. let the american public find out what actually happened. >> let's turn to the ongoing questions surrounding jamal khashoggi's disappearance and apparent murder. secretary pompeo says the investigation will be complete, thorough and transparent. why do you believe the trump administration is relying on the saudis rather than u.s. intelligence agents? >> i have no idea why the administration nor the president is acting as sort of a quasi legal counsel for the saudi government. let's remember what we're talking about here. this is a crime scene. for mr. pompeo to suggest to the president let's give them a few more days to investigate this, what he is really saying is

let's give them a few more days to clean up the crime scene. if anyone trusts to saudis to investigate this murder that took place on their own property, they're deluding themselves. i think that the senate foreign relations committee invoking e thing the mignitsk act. this should be an international investigation and congress should play a role. and then we should determine the proper punishment, including sanctions. it's also appropriate to talk about the role in yemen at this time too. >> congressman, i need to stand by. i have to take a quick break. i want to ask you about other news developing including new allegations that you are raising along with other democrats that president trump intervened inappropriately in the decision whether or not to move the fbi headquarters to protect one of his hotels here in washington. we'll be right back. it's great. mm-hmm.

yeah, and when you move in, geico could help you save on renters' insurance! man 1: (behind wall) yep, geico helped me with renters insurance, too! um... the walls seem a bit thin... man 2: (behind wall) they are! and craig practices the accordion every night! says the guy who sings karaoke by himself. i'm a very shy singer. you're tone deaf! ehh... should we move on to the next one? it's a great building! you'll love it here! we have mixers every thursday. geico®. it's easy to switch and save on homeowners and renters insurance. [woman 2] ..this... [man 1] ...this is my body of proof.

[man 2] proof of less joint pain... [woman 3] ...and clearer skin. [man 3] proof that i can fight psoriatic arthritis... [woman 4] ...with humira. [woman 5] humira targets and blocks a specific source of inflammation that contributes to both joint and skin symptoms. it's proven to help relieve pain, stop further irreversible joint damage, and clear skin in many adults. humira is the number one prescribed biologic for psoriatic arthritis. [avo] humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. [woman 6] ask your rheumatologist about humira. [woman 7] go to mypsaproof.com to see proof in action.

we're back with democratic congressman mike quigley of the house intelligence committee. we want to talk to him about these new allegations by democrats that president trump intervened in plans to relocate fbi headquarters in order to protect his hotel here in washington. congressman, stand by. i want to get some details first from cnn's tom foreman over at headquarters. democrats say congress was misled about the president's involvement. >> yeah, and inspector general

says the same thing, wolf. the truth is we don't really know why the white house is being so cagey about the role of the president in what happens with this property. what we do know is that it could lead to taxpayers paying a lot more and getting less for their money. overcrowded, outdated, and crumbling. plans to relocate and rebuild fbi headquarters have been in the works for years, with government studies showing how it could be moved from downtown d.c. to one of several possible sites in nearby maryland or virginia. the cost? $3.6 billion tax dollars. but now a different plan is calling for the fbi center to be rebuilt right where it is, even though it would be smaller than the suburban alternative, likely have security risks, and be more expensive. $3.8 billion. so who came up with that? >> i'm a real estate guy.

i build buildings. >> reporter: a study by the inspector general of the general services administration traces a series of meetings in which the suburban plan was pushed aside by the trump administration amid claims keeping the headquarters downtown would be cheaper. the report shows team trump's math is wrong. nonetheless, press secretary sarah sanders insists the president wanted to save the government money and also the fbi leadership did not want to move its headquarters. skeptics, however, suspect a hidden motive. for years, donald trump had been all for freeing up that fbi land downtown for private development, with his brand-new hotel close by, even talking about getting in on the action. but congressional democrats in a letter to the gsa say something important changed. after he was sworn in as president and became ineligible as a federal employee to obtain the property, he reportedly became dead opposed to the government selling the property, which would have allowed

commercial developers or the compete directly with the trump hotel. he was directly involved with the decision to abandon the long-term relocation plan and instead move ahead with the more expensive proposal. there is no proof so far, and the white house insists once again house democrats have it all wrong, but those democrats are demanding the paperwork to prove it. >> the government won't turn over the information on the president's exact reasoning. why is the president doing this? >> reporter: we know that this property in downtown d.c. is worth hundreds of millions of dollars, which could also be a savings to taxpayers, at least in theory here. well also know that just beyond those trees, that spire right up there, that is trump hotel. whether all of that played a role in the president's decision, that's what we don't know and what democrats and others are hoping to find out. wolf? >> it's only a block away. tom foreman, thank you very much

for that report. let's bring back congressman mike quigley of illinois, a member of the intelligence committee. congressman, you signed to this letter asking for more information on the president's role in all of this, but even the e-mails that were already released from gsa officials mentioned direction from the white house, what potus directed everyone to do, and the president's instructions. so what else are you hoping to learn? >> well, let's understand something. last april, i asked the gsa administrator under oath whether the president or anyone at the white house was involved in the discussions in this decision about the fbi building. she said no. the inspector general said that she misled us. i suppose that's a d.c. euphemism for a lie. i'd like her to come back before my subcommittee and answer that question accurately. who was at that meeting in the white house when they made this decision? what was said? what did the president say?

was anything said about the trump hotel? the bottom line is as a result of this opaque administration, we are less safe and we're spending more money. >> because if they sell that property on pennsylvania avenue where the current fbi building is, they can tell sele that for hundreds of millions of dollars, which would dramatically reduce the cost of building a new fbi headquarters, whether in maryland, suburban maryland or suburban virginia, if you try to knock it down and rebuild it where it is right there, it's going to cost a lot more. >> and we were told post-9/11 time and again during democrat and republican administrations that it is extraordinarily important for them to move out of that location for security reasons to have a bigger footprint, to have more operations there, to keep us safe, to deal with anti-terrorism strategies. so someone wants to tell me, someone wants to come before the

committee or any other committee and explain how we're more safe, how it's cost-effective to be downtown with this facility, i'm more than willing to listen. but the only logical answer at this point is that it doesn't keep us safe, doesn't save money, the only thing it does right now is benefit trump hotel. the president has not divested himself from this interest. in the end, when he stops being president of the united states, he gains to profit. the fact that there is not a hotel across the street competing with him, he is the one that profits. >> congressman mike quigley, thank you so much for joining us. >> any time. thank you. >> all right, just ahead, top white house officials get into a profanity-laced west wing shouting match. is president trump taking sides in the dispute? and touting his latest weapons. vladimir putin says russia will never strike first, but vows it will annihilate, annihilate any attacker that uses nuclear weapons. so what's behind this latest warning?

right? fact is, there have been twenty-six in the last decade. allstate is adapting. with drones to assess home damage sooner. and if a flying object damages your car, you can snap a photo and get your claim processed in hours, not days. plus, allstate can pay your claim in minutes. now that you know the truth... are you in good hands?

( ♪ ) everybody wants a new, different, better world. here's to the people who do what it takes to build it... to keep it running. the people who understand no matter what the question,

the obstacle or the challenge, there's only one answer... let's do the work. (engine starts, hums)

we're getting some new information, a tweet just posted by michael avenatti, the lawyer for stormy daniels. he tweets this. let me read it to you and our panel. quote, we have set michael cohen's sworn deposition for the date after his sentencing, december 13th, 2018. we have also requested all recordings he has of communications between him and

donald trump. we look forward to disclosing the truth about what trump's fraud and deceit. sabrina siddiqi, how significant potentially is this development if michael avenatti representing stormy daniels in this lawsuit get access to any recordings that, for example that michael cohen may have made between himself and donald trump? >> well, we certainly don't know if michael cohen has agreed to this or will, but it's significant because we do know that michael cohen has said he has recordings of his conversations with the president. one of those we did hear a couple of months ago in which it appeared that the president, then candidate trump did in fact have prior knowledge of a payment that was made to karen mcdougal, one of the women alleged to having an affair with him that national enquirer bought the rights to her story to engage in a catch and kill practice. michael cohen is someone who has been so intimately involved with the president as his personal attorney in the past who has

obviously overseen both his personal and professional dealings. so the insight that he has is unparalleled. and that's why any access to recordings or documents that cohen may have, that's very significant what the president and his legal team have been concerned about this entire time. >> clearly, phil, the feds already have those recordings, in fact if a lot of them exist, whether the u.s. attorney for the southern district of new york, robert mueller and his team. but it's another thing if michael avenatti gets access to all the rorgts. >> yeah, but there is the law and there is politics. let's put the feds here and avenatti here. look, the feds have had access to documents for months now. they've had access obviously to michael cohen for conversations because he is talking to the feds. you can have either the mueller investigation or they can transfer investigations over as we've seen into the southern district of new york. if you're sitting in the white house and you're counselling the president, i would say, look, mr. president, if i'm worried, i'm putting the feds up here because they've had access and documents for months, and michael avenatti, who has already said maybe he has a

political interest, i think he is trying to make sure his sort of 12 minutes of fame turn into 13 minutes as opposed to whether or not the white house really has to worry about whether this compares to the feds. the feds win on this one. >> abbabby, you cover the white house. >> i think this is significant but for a slightly different reason. the white house is always concerned in some ways about the mueller investigation, but the thing about this advocate case is it can surface some things that are more politically damaging to president trump than they might be for his legal prospects. so avenatti is trying to basically create a scenario in which he potentially deposes president trump and potentially unearths embarrassing information about the president. we know that he's been so nervous about this stormy daniels situation, in part because this pertains to his marriage, his personal life, and also it pertains to something that is really unsavory, an alleged extramarital affair. this may not be a case where president trump is in legal jeopardy, but it certainly could

serve as a lot of damaging information. and michael cohen has already made it clear he wants to go after president trump. he's -- we've heard from our sources telling mj lee that he is willing to campaign with democrats in this next cycle. this is all about michael cohen settling scores against someone who has burned him in a major way. and president trump continues to try to diminish him in the media in part because of this dynamic. >> you saw what the president said in an associated press interview earlier this week. basically, he was some low level pr guy. he had a little work, minor work, i barely knew the guy, although he spent ten years working with him. >> ten long years. michael cohen has made a decision he is going to protect himself and he is going to protect himself and he is going to go after president trump. i think it's also worth noting with regard to avenatti getting access to this material, unlike the feds, avenatti is much more likely to leak some of this information out and strategically place this information in the public space in order to embarrass the president. thing is the kind of thing that

has been said that the president really should be concerned about. this information is not going to be protected. it's going to be used for avenatti himself as well as stormy daniels. >> he should be worried about michael cohen, the president? >> he should be. but let me give you a timeline. we're talking about after the midterms. so you have the potential if the press reports are right that you're going to have some mueller -- some of the final elements of the mueller investigation dropped versus whether michael avenatti furthers his legal case against the president. i'm going tell you, if the president drops a dime on the investigation that somehow gets closer to the white house than we've seen so far, that compared to whatever michael avenatti says is going to trump, if you will, avenatti any day. avenatti wants some time in front of the camera. mueller crush the white house if he actually brings indictments against people there. >> let's move on to another sensitive issue, sabrina. our justice reporter laura jarrett reporting that robert mueller, the special counsel, is not feeling the political pressure to wrap up his investigation shortly after the

midterm elections. what does that tell you? >> well, certainly i don't think that robert mueller's taking any of his cues from the midterms and a lot of the political considerations around the investigation, the special counsel has been conducting of course a very thorough inquiry that entails the cooperation of several former officials both in the trump campaign and the early days of the trump administration. and i think a lot of this come downs to the role that rod rosenstein has played, and that's where there's been so much attention around his job security, because he has effectively acted as the gatekeeper of the mueller investigation. and so that raises additional considerations around what the justice department looks like after the midterm elections and whether there might be more trump loyalists at the top of the justice department who might not, as rosenstein has done, allowed mueller's investigation to continue unimpeded. there. >> could be a lot of activity going on right after the midterm elections, but only 19 days way. >> yeah, i think there is already evidence that they are ramping up towards something.

i don't know, i don't think it tells us a whole lot what mueller is actually doing that he could wrap it up by the end of the year, but it does tell us that the investigation is ongoing. it is not -- there was -- i think months ago a theory that perhaps some of the indictments that we saw over the summer was a sign that this was mueller giving us the best that he's got. i don't think that we know that yet. well don't know almost anything about this investigation because it's been happening behind closed doors. but i will say that rod rosenstein is trying to make it very clear that this investigation is legitimate. it's moving forward, and it's not being impeded by president trump. and by president trump giving him a longer lease on his job, it allows him the space to do that. and i think that's the important part about this. >> everybody stand by. if there there is more news we're following. the russian president vladimir putin talking nuclear war. so who were his comments directed at? plus, cnn's town hall tonight, in one of the most watched senate races. we're to be get a live preview. stay with us.

♪ come here! oh my... (applause) ♪ (vocalizing) (dad, over phone) just like that? (vocalizing continues) where people go to learn about their medicare options before they're on medicare. come on in. you're turning 65 soon? yep. and you're retiring at 67? that's the plan! it's also a great time to learn about an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. here's why...medicare part b doesn't pay for everything. this part is up to you. a medicare supplement plan helps pay for some of what medicare doesn't. call unitedhealthcare insurance company today to request this free decision guide. and learn about the only medicare supplement plans endorsed by aarp.

selected for meeting their high standards of quality and service. this type of plan lets you say "yes" to any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. do you accept medicare patients? i sure do! so call unitedhealthcare today and ask for your free decision guide. oh, and happy birthday... or retirement... in advance. ato be there... for the good. and not so good. for the mundane. the awe-inspiring. the heart racing. the heart breaking. that's what life is all about... showing up.

unless migraine steals your chance to say "i am here." that's why, we created aimovig.. a preventive treatment for migraine in adults. one dose, once a month. aimovig is proven to reduce the number of monthly migraine days. for some, that number can be cut in half or more. the most common side effects are pain, redness, or swelling at the injection site and constipation. these are your days what will each one bring? doesn't matter, as long as you can say... "i am here." talk to your doctor about preventing migraine with aimovig. and be there more.

today, life-changing technology from abbott is helping hunt them down at their source. because the faster we can identify new viruses, the faster we can get to stopping them. the most personal technology,

is technology with the power to change your life. life. to the fullest. coming up right at the top of the hour, cnn hosts a town hall in the closely watched texas senate race pitting democratic challenger congressman beto o'rourke against republican incumbent ted cruz. senator cruz -- cnn i should say invited senator cruz multiple times to appear tonight in his own town hall, but he declined. rebecca berg is joining us with a little preview right now. rebecca, how tight is this

senate race in texas? >> well, wolf, it is not as waiting to as beto o'rourke and democrats would like. our latest cnn polling showing ted cruz with a comfy lead over o'rourke, 52-45 in that poll. so what beto o'rourke needs is a game changing moment. potentially he could get that here tonight in this town hall. but one of the problems for beto o'rourke, of course, is that he is fighting a long history of republican support here in texas. this state has not elected a democrat statewide since the 1990s. meanwhile, the president's support in our latest cnn polling remains relatively high here in texas compared to what we've seen in some other states at 49% approval that is also helping boost ted cruz, and the president will be here on monday campaigning for ted cruz, rallying his supporters. so the republican showing expected to be strong. o'rourke needs to get democrats

out to vote. he needs to get latinos out to vote. he has his work cut out for him. he has also been going after ted cruz recently, going on the attack. a change in tone for his campaign, and we'll be watching tonight to see if he continues with that aggressive strategy, wolf. >> immigration, i assume that's going to be a big part of the discussion tonight, specifically specially because the president is making ate huge issue in the days leading up to the november midterms. >> absolutely. it's been a huge issue across the country, consistently rating right up there with health care, which has also been one of the top issues. and we of course are here in mcallen, texas, right on the border with mexico. this was a town that was at the forefront during the child separation controversy we saw earlier this year. and this has been a major issue, of course, here in texas. one of the big dynamics we're seeing here, you know, we've talked about the gender gap apros cross the country in some of these races.

here that is not as much of a dynamic. instead we're seeing really a latino gap with latino voters favoring o'rourke by a wide margin over ted cruz. but the problem for o'rourke and other democrats in states like arizona and nevada is that those voters tend to turn out less in elections like this one. so the challenge is going to be not only making this an issue on election day, but getting those voters who care about it and would support democrats out to the polls. so i'm sure you're going to hear tonight a lot about immigration from o'rourke and audience members asking him these questions. >> i'm sure we will. all right, rebecca, thank you. once again, the texas town hall with beto o'rourke hosted by our own dana bash starts right at the top of the hour. stick around for that. it should be good. let's get back to our panel right now. abby, i want to get your thoughts on the reporting we've been doing here on cnn that there was a huge fight in the west wing, profanity-laced between the white house national security adviser and the white house chief of staff.

>> right. not exactly an unusual dynamic for people within the white house to be fighting with each other, sometimes loudly and angrily. but in this case, it was so -- the dispute was so strong that many people around them who were witnessing it thought that it would lead to one of the two men, john bolton, the national security adviser, and john kelly resigning from their post. but the issue is obviously the issue of immigration across the border. the president is incensed by this caravan coming up from central america, and the other central issue is whether or not department of homeland security secretary kirstjen nielsen is doing enough about it. arguably, the president wants to shut down the border. he wants to cut off aid. but the real question is that really going to be enough to stop this? and is there more that kirstjen nielsen can do? i think some would argue perhaps not. >> you've been doing some important reporting, sabrina, on the republican party's immigration policy as it's emerging. what are you learning? >> i did a review of political

ads by republican candidates and outside groups, and they show just how far the party has gone to really embrace the president's tone and agenda when it comes to immigration. a majority of the immigration-rempted ads by republicans have such an emphasis on the threat posed by ms-13. there is a very clear attempt in the ads to link immigrants to violence and crime and it's juxtaposed with republican candidates touting their support for the president's border wall. and it shows the way in which the party is really trying to play up the politics of fear which was a successful ploy for the president in 2016. now immigration is not the top priority for the american electorate, but it certainly does rank high for republican voters. and it's also important to note that more than $150 million have been spent by republicans both in terms of candidates and committees. that the five times what was spent on immigration related ads in 2014. so it does also show how the

president has successfully turned this into a core election issue as voters head to the polls. >> she makes an excellent point. the base, the trump base out there wants to hear more and more about illegal immigration. >> right. the base does, but i also think that the administration is smart enough to take a look at some of the recent polling on hispanics and the likelihood that hispanics will come out and vote. look, they understand that on this immigration issue, there was the possibility that hispanic americans would kind of rise up and push back very hard on the president's hard-line stance on this issue. but some of the recent report hearing at cnn, some of the polling suggest there's may be a degree of apathy out there in the hispanic community. so the president and his team are looking at that, and they're saying look, we think this is an issue we can push hard on and not have a lot love blow blak on as we get into the election. >> interesting. let me get your thoughts on jamal khashoggi, the saudi journalist, u.s.-based president. the president says now like everyone else he is unfortunately dead. but you saw "the new york times"

reporting today that it looks like the saudis are going to pin the blame on a top saudi intelligence official saying he simply ran amok. >> let me take you inside baseball and tell you to watch the language. it sounds boring, but watch the language. are we going to come out in the american system within the next two or three or four days and say do we have definitive intelligence, almost that indicated the saudi leadership was responsible for that. do we have evidence that you could use in a court or would a reasonable person look at this and say, let me get this straight. 15 individuals, including forensic experts in death, show up on two saudi planes at a saudi diplomatic facility and murder someone, evidently in seven minutes. is it framed to say, do we have evidence? that means we're going to let them off the hook. we do not have evidence for this. or would a reasonable person say the crown prince was involved? yes, they would, and i'm going to say the white house is not going to say that because then that means sanctions. >> you were a senior u.s. intelligence official. what do you think? >> i think phil's right but the

most important thing phil said here is whether or not the intelligence community has evidence. this administration has to ask one question here. the president has to can ask one question. when it comes to determining who has the authoritative account of what happened to jamal khashoggi, the president has to ask himself, is he going to trust and believe in the findings of the u.s. intelligence community or is he going to, as he did with vladimir putin, with kim jong-un, is he going to take the word of mohammed bin salman and -- when he says that he had absolutely nothing to do with this and that the saudis had nothing to do with this. this is another instance in which we see the president looking to bad actors and trusting in what bad actors say over his own intelligence community and analysts. there's too much evidence here for anyone to suggest that the saudis aren't aware of what happened. >> it's worked in saudi arabia for the saudis. you think they're going to come up with some reasonable explanation or just a cover? >> no. we've already gotten the proof of that. let me be very clear on this. if the saudis are saying we've got to investigate this, what are they telling us? the leadership wasn't responsible. if the leadership wasn't responsible, why would you have

to investigate? they would say, i'm sorry, we did this, we made a mistake. what they've already suggested is we're going to come back and say, we dependent really know this but a bunch of our subordinates went out and murdered somebody without authorization. that's not going to fly for me. i think it might fly for the administration. >> don't go too far away. just ahead, the russian president vladimir putin's nuclear warning. who was he threatening to annihilate? instead, he's the tallest guy in his office.l basketball player. yeah, eric's had to compromise a lot in life. ah yes, you need travel insurance when you travel. so, should i set some... hello? but not when it comes to cutting the cord. fubo gives him all the sports he needs as well as all the shows his family loves.

don't compromise. get over 100 channels plus showtime and cloud dvr included. call 844-try-fubo. moving? that's harder now because of psoriatic arthritis. but you're still moved by moments like this. don't let psoriatic arthritis take them away. taltz reduces joint pain and stiffness and helps stop the progression of joint damage. for people with moderate to severe psoriasis, 90% saw significant improvement. taltz even gives you a chance at completely clear skin. don't use if you're allergic to taltz. before starting, you should be checked for tuberculosis. taltz may increase risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection, symptoms, or received a vaccine or plan to. inflammatory bowel disease can happen with taltz, including worsening of symptoms. serious allergic reactions can occur. for all the things that move you. ask your doctor about taltz. there lots of people who are confused about which medicare plan is right for them. hey, that's me. i barely know where to start. well, start here with

me, karen. i'm a licensed humana sales agent. well, it's nice to meet you, karen. i'm john smith. hi, john. at humana, we know you're unique. so you have different needs from other john smiths. yah, i've always thought so. and together, we can find a plan that's right for you. great! i go to the doctor a couple of times a year. and i have some prescriptions. but i'm never fully sure of what's covered and what's not. with humana's all-in-one medicare advantage plans, you get coverage for hospital stays, doctor visits, and part d prescription drug benefits. all for an affordable, and sometimes, no monthly plan premium. do you have any more information? sure. i'll get a decision guide in the mail to you today. they're free. finally. someone who understands the real me. your health and happiness is important to us. call or go online now to get your free decision guide. call a licensed humana sales agent today. nothing says fall like a homecoming football game, so let's promote our fall travel deal on choicehotels.com like this. touchdown.

earn a free night when you stay just twice this fall. or, badda book. badda boom. book now at choicehotels.com

a strong warning from russian if the vladimir putin to potential nuclear aggressors. let's go to our senior international correspondent fred pleitgen from moscow. what is putin saying? >> reporter: yeah. wolf, you know, normally when world leaders speak about the use of nuclear weapons, they do so in a very careful way and they make sure to say they believe nuclear weapons are something that never should be used and while vladimir putin at a discussion panel said that russia would never preemptively use nuclear weapons, he talked about their use in an almost nonchalant way and said that if nuclear weapons were to be used, if there was a nuclear war, that russians would go to heaven. let's listen in to what vladimir putin said exactly. >> translator: well, yes, but then the aggressor should still know that vengeance is inevitable and we are the victims of aggression and as martyrs, we will go to heaven and they will simply die.

because they will not even have time to repent. >> reporter: so, russian president vladimir putin garnering some laughs there with some of the things that he said. also raising some eyebrows as well, just because of the way that he said it and you saw the body language there as well. it's interesting because that was a pretty important forum that vladimir putin does tend to go to pretty much every year. he also talked about his relations with president trump, and he still says that those relations are very good but he does believe there's others in the u.s. who are trying to undermine them but he also said he believes the meetings with president trump are very important and could lead to positive developments in the relations between russia and the united states. >> you know, fred, putin also spoke about the suspected killing of the saudi journalist, jamal khashoggi. what did he say? >> reporter: yeah. well, he seemed to have varying mem me messages on that. he said that russia would not try to, as he said, risk its relations with saudi arabia over

this case because he said that they don't have all the facts yet. he also believes there is a responsibility on the part of the united states because, of course, khashoggi is someone who was a resident or who is a resident in virginia so he does believe that there is some sort of responsibility on the part of the united states. it was interesting, though, he also tried to make a relation to the recent poisoning by russia of spies in england where he said, look, in that case, also, not all the facts were out. but there are already sanctions that have been levied against the russians but in this case, while people already seem to have some of the facts, no sanctions have been levied yet. it's a message that we've been hearing from the kremlin where the russians are saying they believe that internationally, they're not being treated fairly, that they're being treated more harshly than other countries, so you seem to be trying to use that platform to make that case once again. >> fred pleitgen reporting the latest from moscow. fred, thanks very, very much. i'm wolf blitzer in the situation room. thanks very much for watching. the texas town hall with beto

the texas town hall with beto o'rourke begins right now. -- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com good evening from the -- from mcallen, texas, and welcome to a cnn town hall with beto o'rourke. i'm dana barsh. we're here for one of the hottest senate races in the country. democratic congressman beto o'rourke is challenging republican senator ted cruz. o'rourke has captured the national spotlight with a record-shattering fund-raising and viral videos, and now he's trying to come from behind and turn texas blue. with just four days until early voting begins, we invited members of our audience from here in the rio grande valley and all around