security adviser to testify next week. this as we're learning more about john bolton's concerns that politics was influencing mr. trump's ukraine policy. transcript omission. new questions tonight about the white house record of the president's very controversial phone call with ukraine. a major witness revealing that key words were left out of the transcript, including a reference to joe biden. isis raid images. the pentagon just released the first video from the u.s. raid that led to the death of the terrorist leader abu bakr al baghdadi. what do the images reveal? and hurricane force. ferocious winds stoke california's rapidly growing wildfire disaster. the flames threatening thousands of homes and coming dangerusly close to the reagan presidential library. we want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer, you're in theuatithe "situation room."

>> announcer: this is cnn breaking news. >> we're following breaking news on what could be one of the most important witnesses yet in the impeachment investigation. sources tell cnn that house democrats have invited former national security adviser john bolton to testify behind closed doors next week. the impeachment probe is moving at a rapid pace tonight, with growing evidence against the president, just hours before the full house votes on formalizing the investigation. also breaking, a new fire in southern california forces about 26,000 people to evacuate the blaze, fanned by hurricane-force wind gusts. at one point, the reagan presidential library was completely surrounded by flames. i'll talk with house intelligence committee member, mike quigley. and "new york times" columnist, tom friedman. and our correspondents and analysts are also standing by. first, let's go to our congressional correspondent, sunlen serfaty. sunlen, the impeachment witness list keeps growing and growing

and democrats now want to hear directly from john bolton. >> that's right, wolf. this will certainly be a potentially huge moment on capitol hill in the house democrats' impeachment probe. it's not clear at this point if john bolton will appear without a subpoena, but the house committees have officially made the request to him to appear, potentially next week. now, this comes as another key witness, tim morrison, who's a top white house official on trump's national security council, he is set to testify up here on capitol hill tomorrow, but sources now confirming to cnn that he is going to be stepping down and leaving his job soon. certainly a flurry of fast-moving developments in the impeachment probe. tonight, house investigators have extended an invitation to former national security adviser, john bolton, who testify next week, according to a source familiar with the matter. bolton would be the most senior official to testify in the

impeachment inquiry, though it's not clear bolton will agree to appear without a subpoena. source of sources also tell cnn that bill taylor is willing to return to capitol hill to testify in public, a particularly monumental moment in the house democrats' intensifying impeachment inquiry. taylor's testimony last week behind closed doors sent shock waves through the capital, where he completely undercut the administration's defense that there was no quid pro quo with ukraine. meantime, two new witnesses testifying on capitol hill today. christopher anderson, aid to former special envoy to ukraine, kurt volcker, speaking to lawmakers behind closed doors, about the concerns voiced by bolton over rudy giuliani's shadow ukraine operation. anderson, according to his opening statement obtained by cnn, saying bolton cautioned mr. giuliani was a key voice with the president on ukraine, which could be an obstacle to

increased white house engagement. catherine croft, a state department special adviser for ukraine, also appearing today, corroborating the testimony the committees have heard from other witnesses about the push to oust the former u.s. ambassador to ukraine, marie yovanovitch. and testifying today, she was informed that acting white house chief of staff, mick mulvaney, put an informal hold on security assistance to ukraine. the only reason given is that the order came at the direction of the president, croft said today. all of this as the fallout continues from the explosive testimony on capitol hill tuesday of lieutenant colonel alexander vindman. the national security council's top ukraine expert. vindman, who was on that now-famous july 25th phone call between president trump and the ukrainian president directly contradicting trump's public description of the transcript released by the white house. >> i had a transcript done by very, very talented people, word for word, comma for comma, done

by people that do it for a living. we had an exact transcript. >> reporter: president trump touting over and over again that it was an exact transcript of the phone call. the white house in september saying the ellipses that showed up did not represent missing words or phrases, but not so said vindman, who told lawmakers what the white house released was not exact and had at least two parts omitted, a reference to a joe biden tape and a specific mention of burisma, the company where biden's son, hunter, was on the board. burisma, according to vindman, appearing in the transcript as just "the company." sources tell cnn that vindman testified that he tried to make changes to the rough transcript, but his efforts were blocked. and back on bill taylor and the potential for a public testimony. sources tell cnn that a public testimony request has not officially been made by the committees yet, but certainly many democrats see him as a very

ideal first witness, as they move to the next phase of this investigation, wolf, the public phase. wolf? >> all right, sunlen, thank you. sunlen serfaty on capitol hill, as democrats are urging john bolton to testify, president trump is on the attack. jim, there's a new white house response to lieutenant colonel vindman's testimony about omissions in the rough transcript of the president's ukraine phone call. >> reporter: that's right, wolf. the president shifted his attacks today from the whistle-blower to lieutenant colonel alexander vindman, the white house official who says he was alarmed by some of those admissions in the administration's transcript, as he described them, of mr. trump's phone call with the leader of ukraine. those admissions, of course, raise serious questions about the president's claim that the white house provided an exact transcript of that call, as it appears now, that is not the case, but the white house is insisting tonight it is the case. the white house press secretary, stephanie grisham, just released a statement. we could put this up on screen and show it to you.

it says on all of this and some of the testimony from alexander vindman, president trump released a full and accurate transcript of his call with president zelensky, so the american people could see he acted completely appropriately and did nothing wrong. the media is reporting that lieutenant colonel alexander vindm vindm vindman said he proposed filling in wdsha ellipses that appeared in the transcript. that is false. but wolf, there are others a pe pekts of vindman's testimony that may cause trouble for the white house. the president is taking swipes at lieutenant colonel alexander vindman, the national security council official who raised questions about mr. trump's phone call with the leader of ukraine. the president tweeted that the purple heart recipient was a never-trumper witness who could find no quid pro quo in the transcript of the phone call. but sources tell cnn that vindman testified that aid to ukraine was contingent on an investigation of the bidens. mr. trump is urging republicans,

as he tweeted, to go with substance and close it out. but top gop lawmakers are still quarreling with the process, complaining that the upcoming vote on the house impeachment inquiry is too little, too late. >> no due process now. maybe some later, but only if we feel like it is not a standard that should ever be applied to any american, and it should not applied here to the president of the united states. >> democrats say they want to talk substance. >> the president was pressuring a foreign government to target an american citizen. that's an abuse of power. the president said, focus on substance. we're going to focus on substance. >> reporter: one key piece of testimony from vindman, that he was concerned about glaring omissions in the white house transcript of mr. trump's phone call with the ukrainian president. that flies in the face of what president trump has repeatedly told the public. >> the exact transcript of my call, done by very talented people that do this, exact. word for word. >> it was an exact transcription of the conversation. >> i released a transcript of my

conversation, an exact transcript. >> reporter: democrats are firing back at some of the president's defenders. >> i find that astounding and, you know, some people might call that espionage. >> reporter: who question vindman's patriotism. presidential contender pete buttigieg, a veteran himself, says that crosses a line. >> ours is the patriotism that would never question the integrity of someone who blows the whistle on official misconduct, least of all a war hero. acting out his loyalty to the republic for which we all stand. >> reporter: more questions are being raised about the operation to take out isis leader abu bakr al baghdadi. at a briefing behind closed doors, house speaker nancy pelosi blasted administration officials for leaving top democrats in the dark on the mission. acting white house chief of staff, mick mulvaney, was also briefed on the operation after it was over. but a white house official pushed back on the notion that mulvaney was out of the loop, saying he was hope for the weekend family.

the operation began very quickly and while he was not able to get a secure location in time to participate, he was briefed on its success upon conclusion. mulvaney has been on shaky ground since he acknowledged a quid pro quo with ukraine earlier this month. >> i have news for everybody, get over it. there's going to be political influence in foreign policy. >> reporter: but the president has found somebody under his command to praise, the dog from the baghdadi image, showing this photoshopped image of the k-9 commando receiving a medal. now with the whistle-blower and vindman offering damaging testimony in the impeachment inquiry, there are growing concerns about the safety of both. the whistle-blower has been on the receiving end of some threatening messages and senate majority leader chuck schumer said earlier in the day that he has sent a letter to the pentagon, requesting that efforts be made to guarantee vindman's safety. wolf. >> let's hope that happens, that he is secure. thank you so much, jim acosta, over at the white house. let's get to another breaking story. the pentagon just releasing the first video from the raid that led to the death of the isis

leader, abu bakr al baghdadi. the images just declassified. quickly want to go to our pentagon correspondent, barbara starr. barbara, what are we seeing? what are we learning from these images? >> extraordinary to see this, wolf. this is a highly classified mission. clearly, president trump wanted the world to see these images. three videos were released a short time ago here at the pentagon. the first one shows as u.s. helicopters are beginning to approach the compound to land u.s. commandos to begin the mission, they come under fire from the ground. there are other militants there not to be believed to be isis, and those onboard the helicopter quickly fire back and eliminate this opposing force on the ground. then they rapidly move towards the compound, an extraordinary image here, hopefully you can take a second and see there are dark figures moving towards the compound. these are u.s. special forces. they are moving in and they find baghdadi in a tunnel area.

that tunnel collapses, fills with water, there are wires there. it collapses because in part, he has detonated, obviously, his suicide vest. that is -- the tunnel is where two u.s. service members and the military working dog are injured with electrocution injuries. all three have returned to duty. a very interesting detail coming to light here. general mackenzie who briefed the pentagon press corps a short time ago says they are looking at this. they think it is possible that baghdadi fired his weapon back. general mackenzie along with the secretary of defense and the chairman of the joint chiefs pblicly unable to confirm the president's account that baghdadi died whimpering or crying. they say they simply don't know anything about it. and the last video we see is, of course, u.s. aircraft rolling in, destroying the compound from the air. general mackenzie saying they wanted to do that to make sure it did not become a shrine and that this is simply just another

piece of ground. so one of the most interesting things is, they were certain baghdadi was there and it was not an area of syria where they expected to find him. so when these missions are planned, it is with certainty that they know, not just when they're taking off, but when they land, that their target will still be there and he was. wolf? >> very dramatic video, indeed. thanks very much, barbara starr at the pentagon. joining us now, congressman mike quigley. he's a democrat, serves on the house intelligence committee. congressman, thanks so much for joining us. i want to get back to the breaking news on the impeachment inquiry. you've now invited the former national security adviser to president trump, john bolton, to testify next week. many different witnesses have testified about bolton's role in all of this. how important is it, congressman, for all of us, for you specifically behind closed doors next week to hear from him directly? >> well, we've learned from other testimony how important he would be as a witness.

i'm hoping that he really wants to testify, to show the courage that the others have so far, colonel vindman and the ambassadors who have testified so far. they've shown real -- and the whistle-blower. they have talked truth to power that the president of the united states have abused their power and muscled an ally that is very vulnerable at this time. and if indeed what we have learned is true, that he thought this was a drug deal, he thought that mr. giuliani was a hand grenade, that he was repulsed by this and canceled a meeting and said, go talk to the lawyers, then tell the american people. because they have a right to know, and i think he's also very concerned about ukraine and its importance. all the more reason for him to let the public know what happened, and try to make sure it never happens again. >> how confident are you, congressman, that bolton will appear, his longtime aide, charles cupperman has decided not to testify until a federal court weighs in. >> look, there are people close

to the white house and every time i show up to hear testimony, i think it's probably 50/50 whether or not they'll show up. i would like to think that he could show the same courage that was seen with the witnesses so far. those who have put their careers on the line and unfortunately with the whistle-blower, those who had to put his life on the line to tell the truth. >> the top u.s. diplomat in ukraine, bill taylor, is willing to testify publicly. he's already been deposed behind closed doors. how influential will he be in an open hearing? >> look, just taking from his opening statement, it's clear he was witness to this scheme and he details this scheme of a shadow foreign policy led by someone who has no security clearance, no foreign policy experience, operating under directions by who knows who, mr.

giuliani. he was an extraordinary witness. i think his presence, again, just working off his opening statement, will be commanding. >> we just heard from our correspondent, kylie atwood, that tim morrison, the top white house official on the president's national security council for europe, he's leaving his job. we expect him to be leaving his job very soon. he's supposed to testify behind closed doors before the impeachment inquiry tomorrow. what do you anticipate from that? >> here's what i expect from all such witnesses. first that they'll tell the truth, that they'll show courage to do so. none of them have contradicted the transcript, the complaining witness and the text that we have learned so far. i think the majority of the case have been put before the american public. they know that the president abused his power. all the witnesses have done so far is to corroborate that, to build upon that case, and to continue to fill in the gaps of knowledge. >> you were in the room today,

the closed-door room during the depositions of two more witnesses. what sort of context did they provide on the timeline of this pressure on ukraine and rudy giuliani's specific role? >> and i can't talk about specific testimony, but i will say the witnesses continue to be uniform and not contradictory, corroborating what we learned at the very beginning. building the case, filling in gaps, often what one witness does is lead us to questions. other questions, and other people we would like to bring before the committee to ask questions about. >> are you any closer to fully understanding, congressman, why the $400 million in u.s. military aid that had been appropriated, authorized by congress was actually frozen by the president at the last minute? >> i personally have no doubt as to why it was frozen. the president of the united states was using whatever leverage he had, military

assistance and a meeting in the oval office to get the ukrainians to do research for him, to do his political dirty work against his opponent. i don't have any doubt about that. but we continue to build the case because the american people has a right to learn about other crimes and misdemeanors and how to fill in the gaps of the existing case. >> have witnesses confirmed what you're telling us? >> all they have done is -- even if all you did was read the opening statements, i think all they do is corroborate the original whistle-blower complaint and the transcript that the white house released. when all you can do is build upon that, the fundamental case is there. there's a lot more to learn, but i think the body of the case is there. the american public is well aware that the president abused his power. >> the austin army lieutenant colonel vindman serves on the president's national security council, testified yesterday

that the white house omitted additional mentions of the bidens and burisma. that's that ukrainian natural gas company that hunter biden was on the board of, in the rough transcript of that july phone call between president trump and zelensky. how do you interpret that as you just heard the white house is formally denying to assertion by the lieutenant colonel. >> i would ask the american public, we don't leave our common sense at the door. if the white house was so forthcoming about this, why did they hide this phone call and a secret server right out of the back? why did they try to hide this? and why have they tried to obstruct every witness who would come forth in front of the american public, through its elected body of congress, to tell us exactly what took place? they don't want the american public to know all the details. >> tomorrow, the house will vote on the impeachment inquiry moving into this new official

formal phase, a full vote on the floor of the house of representatives. you speak to a lot of members including your republican colleagues. do you expect to get any republican votes? >> you know, i don't. it's unfortunate. we know one member has left the republican party and it's talked about why the president of the united states should be impeached. but other than that, i don't. first the republicans talked about wanting this resolution, this vote, and then when it's being offered, they're sayingworkers, it's not enough. it's just proof that they want to talk about process, because they don't want to talk about what the president did. and the fact is, i've been part of this investigation since day one. and can i tell you firsthand that the republicans have worked hand in glove this administration to obstruct all of his crimes and misdemeanors. it continues today. >> congressman mike quigley, thanks so much for joining us. >> thank you. >> just ahead, will john bolton agree to testify in the impeachment investigation? we're going to talk about the breaking news story that's

unfolding right now with "new york times" columnist and author, thomas friedman. he's standing by. there you see him. he's here with me in "the situation room." and we'll also go live to southern california where wildfires and hurricane-force winds are raging. i thought i was managing my moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. but i realized something was missing... me. the thought of my symptoms returning was keeping me from being there for the people and things i love most. so, i talked to my doctor and learned humira can help get, and keep, uc under control when other medications haven't worked well enough. and it helps people achieve control that lasts so you could experience few or no symptoms. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores.

don't start humira if you have an infection. be there for you, and them. ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, control is possible.

red lobster's endless shrimp is back for just fifteen ninety nine. get all the shrimp you want, any way you want 'em. like new sriracha-honey shrimp... ...savory grilled teriyaki shrimp,... ...classic shrimp scampi and more! red lobster's endless shrimp is fifteen ninety nine. hurry in.

some breaking news tonight. impeachment investigators add a big name to their witness list. house democrats are now asking the president's former national security adviser, john bolton, to testify next week. let's talk about the investigation with "new york times" columnist and author, tom friedman, the author of "from beirut to jerusalem." the book came out a long time and it's coming out again. it's still very relevant. so john bolton, a man you've covered, i've covered, we've known him for a long time. the speculation is from the president's perspective, worst-case scenario, he could be the john dean of this impeachment inquiry. what do you think? >> i think there's probably a lot of attention with john bolton now, because he is someone who believed in a very, very strong presidency, going back to the george w. bush administration. probably wouldn't want to be the agent of weakening the presidency. at the same time, he's a person of integrity. he clearly, from all the other witnesses, wolf, was someone who was on to this. i think he was quoted as describing all of giuliani's

parallel ukraine policies as a drug deal. and every time his name has come up, it's come up as a person who opposed this policy, thought it was wrong, illegal, and immoral. and so, if he does testify, i think it could be enormous. what we do know, though, is he's represented by the same lawyer as another nsc deputy, cupper mesne, who's chosen not to testify so far. they've thrown it to the courts to try to sort of out the impeachment writes versus the rights of executive privilege. insit with bated breath to see if he comes out. >> the president wants republicans to defend him very vocally on the substance of that controversial phone call he had with the ukrainian president. do you think any republicans are going to step forward? because they're really going after the process. >> i think what's going to happen here, wolf, is this. they clearly are not comfortable defending the substance against diplomats, army officers, independent public servants who

have really exposed all the chicanery here. what they've done is to attack the process and to attack the people, these civil servant who bearing witness to this. it's just shameful. the pushback that's come in the last day, wolf, in the attacks on the ukraine officer -- the ukraine specialist army officer. >> alexander vindman. lieutenant colonel. >> i think what you're going to see is that republicans are going to conclude that's really a bad strategy. the american public will not like that. i think what they'll do in the end is they're going to say, yep, trump did it, it was awful, but it's not impeachable. and therefore the house will impeach him, the republicans in the senate won't convict, because they'll say the american people should bring this judgment, not us. i think they will realize that tacking our civil service, our army officers, some really distinguished people is not a winning hand. >> when you go back and read this rough transcript that the white house released of the president's controversial phone conversation with the ukrainian

president zelensky, it says right at the bottom of page 1, this is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. it's called a memorandum of a telephone conversation. and if you go through it on several points, there are ellipses. biden went pander bragging that he stopped the prosecution, so if you can look into it -- dot, dot, dot -- it sounds horrible to me. so we don't know what's in the dot, dot, dot. another point, i would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with ukraine. they say crowdstrike, dot, dot, i guess, you have one of your wealthy people, dot, dot, dot. the server, they say ukraine has it. now, as you know, in this whole operation, colonel vindman, a decorated u.s. army officer who serves on the national security adviser, who speaks ukrainian and russian, he says that those dot, dot, dots eliminated certain very sensitive points. he says trump telling zelensky there were tapes of biden. zelensky mentioned burisma, the

natural gas company. so who do you believe? do you believe the lieutenant colonel vindman, who says he wanted to insert some of those missing words in the transcript? or do you believe the president's press secretary, just released a statement, stephanie grisham, who said, what we can confirm is that he never suggested filling in any words at any points where ellipses appear in the transcript. the media is reporting that vindman proposed filling in words that were missing in areas where ellipses were shown in the transcript. this is false. >> i wouldn't believe her she told me it was dark outside right now, wolf. the president has lied at every juncture of this story. he told us early on that the whistle-blower, his analysis of the conversation was completely wrong. it turns out to be exactly right. and as you've reported, every single witness has confirmed what the whistle-blower said. and you can assume that vindman was taking notes, as he's listening. he's obviously got those notes.

he went to him with them and someone obviously turned this down. these are people, they lie as they breathe, really. the president. every other word out of his mouth. did she appear in public? >> she's done some interviews on fox news. >> that's really courageous. and so none of them, hey, come on out. let us question you about this. everything is a blast from the white house, picked up by fox news, which is very happy to cater to all of these conspiracy theories and the truth will come out. we'll find all of this out. >> and these attacks on lieutenant colonel vindman that have been going on now for 24, almost 48 hours. and these attacks, it's disgusting. >> it's disgusting and shameful. and the best sign, i don't think it has a long life with republicans, that attack mode is that people like liz cheney have

come out and said, do not go there. >> she's right. >> she's absolutely right. it's a lot of republicans have been uncomfortable with this. in the end, wilf, what they're all going to do, i believe, is what mulvaney said, yeah, he did it. and yeah, it wasn't good, but it's not impeachable. that's where they're going to hide at the end of the day. >> what's really worrisome, and you heard chuck schumer, he's now asking the u.s. army, and this is an active duty u.s. military officer assigned to the national security council what kind of plans they have to protect lieutenant colonel vindman from retaliation, because there are serious threats now being leveled against this war hero. he was injured, received a purple heart during his service in iraq. >> these people, they really have no -- they have no bounds. we have had a baseball umpire talk about going out and buying an assault weapon. and i think we can't the intimidated by these people.

it's necessary to call out this behavior. they want to make us afraid. they want to put us in this situation, we don't want any conflict. we should not be afraid of these people, they are cowards, okay? someone who would attack an army officer with a purple heart for telling the truth. who are you people? come on out in the open. >> yeah, well, they're clearly reluctant to do so right now. this is an awful situation that's unfolding right now. we, of course, wish only the best for colonel vindman. he's got an incredible story, came here as a 3-year-old with his twin brother from ukraine, then part of the soviet union in 1979. they went to brooklyn, where so many other soviet yjews wound u, went to harvard and has done really great work. >> these are people who every day go around and are very happy to tell our soldiers to make the ultimate sacrifice, and none of them will make even the smallest political sacrifice to stand up

to a president who is violating his oath. they are such incredible cowards. >> tom friedman, thanks so much for coming in. >> a pleasure. >> the breaking news continues next. will house democrats subpoena former national security adviser, john bolton, if he declines their invitation to testify in the impeachment inquiry. panera's new warm grain bowls are full of good. full of flavor, color, full of- woo! full of good. so you can be too. try our new warm grain bowls today. panera. food as it should be. just it just takes a lothat's happeninof the burdener body, of diabetes management off my shoulders. i can see arrows trending up, trending sideways, trending down and that tells me what kind of care she'd going to need in the next few minutes. when she went to argentina last summer i didn't have to freak out but i did a tiny bit, still. it's really hard for a mom to prick her 2-year-old's finger. so having no fingerpricks makes me a very happy mama.

(amber jagger) if we don't give students from an underserved background the technology that they need in school, they're not going to be competitive in the workforce that's waiting for them. since verizon innovative learning, students have hardware, connectivity, and quality curriculum. the jobs of tomorrow will involve technology. now students are truly hopeful for what they may achieve. leave no man behind. or child. or other child. or their new friend. or your giant nephews and their giant dad.

or a horse. or a horse's brother, for that matter. the room for eight, 9,000 lb towing ford expedition.

billions of problems. dry mouth? parched mouth? cotton mouth? there's a therabreath for you. therabreath oral rinse and lozenges. help relieve dry mouth using natural enzymes to soothe and moisturize. so you can... breathe easy, there's therabreath at walmart. that could allow hackers devices into your home.ys and like all doors, they're safer when locked. that's why you need xfinity xfi. with the xfi gateway, devices connected to your homes wifi are protected. which helps keep people outside

from accessing your passwords, credit cards and cameras. and people inside from accidentally visiting sites that aren't secure. and if someone trys we'll let you know. xfi advanced security. if it's connected, it's protected. call, click, or visit a store today. annoepidemic fueled by juul use with their kid-friendly flavors. san francisco voters stopped the sale of flavored e-cigarettes. but then juul, backed by big tobacco, wrote prop c to weaken e-cigarette protections. the san francisco chronicle reports prop c is an audacious overreach, threatening to overturn the ban on flavored products approved by voters. prop c means more kids vaping. that's a dangerous idea. vote no on juul. no on big tobacco. no on prop c. we're following a lot of the breaking news in the impeachment

investigation right now, including a potentially very powerful new witness. sources telling cnn house democrats have invited the former national security adviser at the white house, john bolton, to testify behind closed doors next week, but his attorney has just told cnn's ariane de vogue that bolton will not appear without a subpoena. let's bring in our team of experts and kaitlin, i think it's fair to say, he will be receiving a subpoena. >> that seems likely. >> so far, they had been waiting on that. they had just issued an invitation so far, but a subpoena was definitely likely. the question is what happens when they do issue a subpoena that does seem likely right now. because he has this attorney, charles cooper, the same attorney that his deputy, charlie cupperman has. and so far, they've gone to court with charlie cupperman over his request to appear before these house investigators, essentially wanting a court to decide whether or not they have to show up or not. now, that ruling will likely affect what john bolton does as well, though he is someone people definitely want to talk to, because he has firsthand

knowledge of a lot of this. >> and he was deeply upset about the role that rudy giuliani was in organizing, conducting u.s. policy towards ukraine. >> yeah, that's right, he could really provide one of the most consequential testimonies in this whole proceeding, given his front row seat to so much of this, including that july 10th meeting at the white house, including with ukrainians, as well as ambassador sondland, where he was abruptly ended the meeting because he was concerned about what sondland was saying. so what he can do is corroborate other testimony from fiona hill, alex vindman from yesterday and also shed new light. remember, it was bolton who apparently told fiona hill to raise her concerns with the lawyer at the nsc. one of the big questions is, why was that and did he do anything to actually intervene. also, remember, he left the same week that the ukraine aide was released or questions about why he left the white house, and he didn't leave on great terms, as

we know, with president trump. so that also makes him a concern to the white house. yeah, awful terms in some of the statements coming in from official white house press people suggesting this guy was completely unqualified for this important position. jeffrey toobin, how do you see all of this unfolding? >> i don't think there is much legal ground in which to object to his testimony. this cupperman case seems sort of silly to me. this is a subpoena. it's a valid subpoena. all the other witnesses have responded to the subpoena. the idea that when you get a subpoena, you have to go to court and say, judge, should i comply with this? i just don't get that. the fact that the white house counsel has raised in this eight-page letter this blanket objection, that doesn't seem to have any legal base at all, and the fact that these others have come through and testified about these conversations, i can't imagine that a judge would say, you, john bolton, don't have to

testify about the very same conversation. >> do you agree? >> i'm sorry, wolf, i couldn't hear what he was saying. >> he was suggesting that the case of not appearing even with a subpoena is very, very weak. he doesn't think any judge who would withhold that. >> i think if i was his attorney, i would suggest him to get a subpoena, too. >> if he has a subpoena, he has to appear. >> he may try to assert, as others have done executive privilege, which does make sense, all right? his conversations with the president would be covered by executive privilege, and that's one of the things that i think that he could add compared to many of these other witnesses. he likely had direct interactions with the president of the united states, and would know what was said, so. >> sorry to interrupt you, but go ahead, jeffrey. >> just, you know, you can't refuse to testify about any subject on executive privilege. that has to be litigated on a question-by-question basis. there is a possibility that some conversations are covered by executive privilege, but

certainly these other conversations, where the president is not present, certainly those, i don't think there would be any valid claim of executive privilege. >> and it's -- >> what do you think, jim? >> a big leak on the legal front that ties into all of this, because you have the don mcgahn case tomorrow before a judge, a judge will hear on both sides. >> former white house counsel. >> the former white house counsel who also has been subpoenaed and isn't showing up. so depending on how the judge rules tomorrow, we don't know if it will happen tomorrow or at a later date. that can also play into all of this. and cupperman's case was asked to be rescheduled, i think for early november. we don't know whether that has actually happened yet. but that could also, of course, play into whether bolton testifies. >> what do you think, david? >> i do see what jim is saying about executive privilege. bolton is a principle. he was the national security adviser and not a staffer. on the other hand, because some of these other figures over the last two weeks, like ambassador taylor, like fiona hill have already testified and they've sort of set a precedent and the

congress is proceeding with an impeachment proceeding, not just a regular hearing. if you're bolton, you also have to make a political calculation, not just a legal calculation, where you essentially say, do i look like i'm covering for the president at this point? or do i want to get my version of events on the record before i'm sort of put further on the hot seat. these subpoenas are sort of functioning as cover as folks saying, look, i didn't want to necessarily testify, but because i was subpoenaed, i'm going to go ahead and testify. >> everybody, stick around. there's a lot more we need to cover on all of this breaking news. also, more breaking news we're following. we'll take you inside some dramatic white house meetings on ukraine that went sour. it helps explain why impeachment investigators are so eager for john bolton to testify. ♪ born to be wild... ♪ ♪ ♪ born to be wild...

♪ no, just a sec. what would it look like if we listened more? could the right voice, the right set of words, bring us all just a little closer? get us to open up? even push us further? it could, if we took the time to listen. the most inspiring minds, the most compelling stories. download audible and listen for a change.

can match the power of energizer. because energizer ultimate lithium is the longest lasting aa battery in the world. [confetti cannon popping] energizer. backed by science. matched by no one. performance comes in lots of flavors. ♪ (dramatic orchestra) there's the amped-up, over-tuned, feeding-frenzy-of sheet-metal-kind. and then there's performance that just leaves you feeling better as a result. that's the kind lincoln's about. ♪ (past them because she didn't sknow they were talking to her.g and she would just walk right (deborah) i just could not hear. i was hesitant to get the hearing aids because of my short hair, but nobody even sees them. (avo) our nearly invisible hearing aids are just one reason we've been the brand leader for over 70 years.

(deborah) when i finally could hear for the first time, i started crying. i could hear everything. (avo) get special anniversary savings and your chance to win a seven day hawaiian cruise. call 1-800-miracle today.

we're back with breaking news. a lawyer for john bolton now says the former national security adviser will not appear before impeachment investigators without a subpoena. bolton was involved in very sensitive talks on ukraine policy that are at the center of the impeachment probe right now. our political correspondent, sara murray, has been digging on all of this for us.

sara, what are you learning from your sources on the latest testimony? >> well, that's right, wolf. obviously, we know that the transcript of the call, when the white house released it, or the rough transcript was a bombsh l bombshell. but the latest testimony coming out shows that there were explosive developments happening behind the scene at the white house in the weeks leading up to it. >> reporter: weeks ahead of president trump's controversial july 25th phone call with the ukrainian president that sparked the impeachment inquiry, the riff over ukraine spilled out in a series of dramatic white house meetings. on july 10th, ukraine's secretary of national security and defense counsel traveled to washington to meet with then national security adviser john bolton, then special envoy to ukraine, kurt volcker, ambassador to the eu, gordon sond u.s. career national security officials who were experts on russia, fiona hill and alexander vindman was also there. perry tweeted a picture of the delegation.

the americans he praised and their counterparts, saying great discussion, great team work. we stand with ukraine. privately, though, things were going sour. the ukrainians were with newly elected president zelensky and president trump as the country continued to face threats from russia. ambassador sondland started to speak about specific investigations, at which time ambassador bolton cut the meeting short. vindman, the white house expert on ukraine testified tuesday. >> i want to thank colonel vindman for his courage in coming forward. >> after bolton cut off the meeting there was another meeting where sondland talked with the ukrainians and pressed once again for the political investigations trump was demanding. vindman testified ambassador sondland emphasized the importance that ukraine deliver the investigations into the 2016 election, the bidens and burisma. then vindman and hill confronted sondland. i stated to ambassador sonde

mapd that his statements were inappropriate, that the request to investigate biden and his son had nothing to do with the national security and his statements were inappropriate. >> he heard ambassador sondland tell the ukrainians that to get a white house meeting that they needed to deliver on investigations into vice president biden. that, anderson, is a this for that, in other words, a quid pro quo. >> but sondland offered investigators a different version of events. testifying, if ambassador bolton, dr. hill or others harbored any misgivings about the prop righty about what they were doing, they never shared those misgivings with me then or later. he also said he was not aware that burisma, the ukrainian energy company hunter biden served on the board of was connected to theed bience until much later. bolton encouraged hill what he had seen to the national security council lawyer. hill explained he wasn't going

to get involved if whatever drug deal sondland and acting chief of staff mick mulvaney were cooking up. sources told cnn. >> he has relevant information and we do want him to come in to testify. >> wolf, obviously, there is conflicting testimony on some of these key events and one person who was there that can clear it up, john bolton and we'll see if he speaks to investigators. >> excellent reporting from sara murray. we are also following breaking news on the california wildfire disaster. a new blaze stoked by hurricane-force wind gusts has forced new evacuations. cnn's bill weir is on the scene for us in southern california. bill, what are the conditions like right now? >> reporter: well, it's surreal, wolf, to be honest. for one reason, i'm standing in the middle of highway 23 in the simi valley, thousand oaks area, and it is, i can use the war metaphor, because it fits because there's been surprise

attacks from this fire, the easy fire named after easy street where it started and surprise attacks and long skirmishes and defenses like this one. you can see the cal fire crews in yellow up there and the guys in orange are fire fighting inmates who are selected and paid two to three bucks a day to do this, as well, but what's interesting about these hurricane-force winds and sustained 40 mile-an-hour winds, wolf, and gusts up to 60 miles an hour and there no way to stop these embers, so this, they thought highway 23 could be a fire break and as you see, there's one of the choppers and there's, i believe, 15 helicopters dropping this phos-chek. it's the pink flame retardant or they're pulling water out of the nearby lakes to put it out there. as i was saying, they thought they stopped the fire in highway

23, but somehow one of these embers flew over the wall. let me show you through this little window and you'll see that all the fire crews that are here, once they contain this hillside, they have a whole other front over here. and wolf, this is just one of ten fires in southern california. it's brutal. >> it certainly is. be careful over there, bill. >> we will stay in close touch with you. much more news right after this.

had the powere with type one diabetes to manage their condition without fingersticks? to always know their glucose levels and where they're heading with just a glance at their smart device. the power to make treatment decisions to customize alerts and alarms to help keep them in range. the power to lower their a1c. all this knowledge... powered by a small wearable. the dexcom g6.

let me tell you something, i wouldn't be here if i thought reverse mortgages took advantage of any american senior, or worse, that it was some way to take your home. learn how homeowners are strategically using a reverse mortgage loan to cover expenses, pay for healthcare, preserve your portfolio and so much more. a reverse mortgage loan isn't some kind of trick to take your home. it's a loan, like any other. big difference is how you pay it back. find out how reverse mortgages really work with aag's free, no-obligation reverse mortgage guide. with a reverse mortgage, you can pay whatever you can, when it works for you, or, you can wait, and pay it off in one lump sum when you leave your home. discover the option that's best for you. call today and find out more. i'm proud to be a part of aag, i trust em, i think you can too.

we have some exciting news to report. a new grandson for our chief political analyst gloria borger. george morgan was born last night weighing in at just over six pounds. we are told he and his parents maine and evan are doing well along with older sister harper, and gloria says she and her husband lance are simply enchanted. we are so happy for the entire family and thrilled to welcome another new member to our situation room family. finally tonight, we are watching a developing story. the decisive game seven of the world series. the washington nationals came to tie the series with the houston astros at three games a piece. been or lose, we nats fans are so proud of our team for this truly amazing season and remarkable playoff run. we know they'll stay in the

fight and we leave you with these words. very important word, indeed, go nats. let's hope for a win. i'm wolf blitzer. thanks very much for watching. erin burnett "out front" starts right now. out front next, breaking news. the top white house ukraine expert testified he was convinced of a quid pro quo between trump and ukraine even before that infamous phone call. this as john bolton says no way to a voluntary deposition before congress. and trump's hand picked ambassador to russia breaks with the president. what he's saying under oath tonight. plus mick mulvaney out of the loop. why did trump's chief of staff learn about the raid that killed the head of isis only after it was over? let's go out front. good evening. i'm erin burnett. out front tonight, the breaking news. it was personal. the top white house ukraine expert testified to impeachment investigators that he was