tv CNN Newsroom With Victor Blackwell and Christi Paul CNN November 16, 2019 7:00am-8:00am PST
for powerful relief from cold and flu symptoms without a prescription. try theraflu multi-symptom. theraflu dissolves in seconds, so it's ready to work before your first sip, and absorbs quickly to target and attack 8 cold and flu symptoms fast. try theraflu. well, good morning to you, saturday, november 16th at 10:00 a.m. we're glad that you're up with us, i'm christi paul. >> and i'm victor blackwell. you're in the cnn newsroom. >> so just moments ago, mark sandy, seen there an official with the white house budget office, arriving on capitol hill. he's complying with a subpoena to answer questions about military aid to ukraine. >> lawmakers are looking for a timeline here. when was the aid put on hold,
when was it released. >> today's testimony follows an explosive day in the impeachment inquiry yesterday, though. for the very first time a witness says he personally heard president trump demand ukraine investigate the bidens. >> and even more here, this state department official says that he was told that the president didn't really care about ukraine, only, quote, the big stuff that involved the president. >> and democrats are accusing president trump of witness intimidation after he insulted the former ambassador to ukraine on twitter. he tweeted as she was testifying. >> president trump slammed her and her job performance and then said he had a right to defend himself. >> we're covering this from all angles for you. rene marsh in washington, kristen holmes on capitol hill. >> let's start with kristen. kristen, good morning to you. >> reporter: good morning there, victor. that's exactly right. so essentially what we just saw was mark sandy going behind
these closed doors. he is a career official with the office of management and budget and they're hoping to get that timeline to see what he knew about withholding that funding from ukraine. i want to talk about that testimony that happened last night behind closed doors because we're hearing from a lot of democrats who are saying that this was really critical testimony, that they believe it advanced the impeachment inquiry. here's why. this is about a man named dave holmes. he is a staffer at the u.s. embassy in ukraine and we learned through public testimony earlier this week that he overheard a conversation between president trump and the ambassador to the european union, gordon sondland. i want to set the scene here just like holmes did in his testimony. he said he was able to share this conversation because they were out to a meal. him, sondland, two other staffers, when sondland placed this call to president trump. president trump speaking so loudly that holmes was able to hear him. at one point sondland had to move the phone away from his ear, that's how loudly he was
talking. so this is what holmes says that he heard in this conversation. he said then i heard president trump ask so he's going to do the vex? ambassador sondland replied he's going to do it, adding that president zelensky will do anything you ask him to. now, the phone conversation ended there, but the conversation between sondland and holmes did not. holmes asking sondland is it true that president trump doesn't care about ukraine? holmes says that sondland replied that the president only cares about, quote, big stuff that benefits the president like the biden investigation that mr. guiliani was pushing. now, this raises a lot of questions. first of all, it brings president trump closer to this pressure campaign. but it also raises questions about gordon sondland who testified behind closed doors and never mentioned this phone call. so he will be testifying in public next week. obviously this is going to be a question that these lawmakers have. >> kristen holmes, we appreciate it so much. thank you. i want to bring in cnn's rene
marsh as well because we've heard from ambassadors, diplomats and policy experts. people might be wondering why are we hearing from an official from the budget office? >> right. so this has really become central, the office of management and budget, also known as omb. essentially for people who don't know, this agency doles out money that congress approves and make sure that agencies don't overspend and also make sure that the money that's been approved is spent. that's why this agency has become so central because this is where thine freezing of that aid occurred. mark sandy who just arrived on capitol hill for his closed-door deposition, he will be the first omb employee to testify behind closed doors. he's a long-time career employee. he's worked under administrations of both parties. and so far we have had very little visibility on the behind-the-scenes workings for all this all played out. democratic investigators are really hoping that sandy will shed some light on those
internal conversations when the administration was taking this very unusual step of freezing this $400 million in military aid that congress, by the way, had already approved for ukraine. now, he will likely be asked several questions, including did the freeze raise any alarm for him. was he told why it was happening. how involved was he in this process or was he cut out of the process at some point, and we do know that political appointees signed some of the documents freezing this aid and that in itself is very unusual, according to sources who have spoken to cnn. back to you guys. >> all right, rene marsh for us. thank you. to the white house and our own sara westwood here. have you heard a reaction from the white house this morning to all of this yet? >> reporter: christi, all through yesterday the white house was continuing to attack the impeachment inquiry, the democrats who are leading it and trying to undermine the credibility of the witnesses that we've seen testify so far.
and that pattern continued yesterday with the president tweeting out that attack on former ambassador to the ukraine, marie yovanovitch as she was testifying before the house intelligence committee. chairman schiff gave her a chance to respond and she said she felt intimidated and even some republicans said they did not degree with the president's decision to tweet an attack on the witness as she was testifying. democrats are saying they might consider this witness intimidation. jim clyburn even saying they could possibly consider it as a potential article of impeachment when the inquiry reaches that point. president trump defending himself said he was just exercising his free speech rights and didn't think he was intimidating anyone. take a listen. >> were you trying to intimidate ambassador yovanovitch? >> i just want a total -- i want freedom of speech. that's a political process.
the republicans have been treated very badly. >> sir, do you believe -- >> quiet. quiet. >> sir, do you believe your tweets and words can be intimidating? >> i don't think so at all. >> reporter: campaign sources tell cnn many privately believe it was a mistake for the president to attack yovanovitch as she was testifying before the house intelligence committee with one source telling cnn it allowed democrats to control the narrative surrounding yesterday's hearing, so putting the president and his allies at a messaging disadvantage as they were trying to combat what was an emotional day of testimony on capitol hill yesterday, victor and christi. >> we saw a few republicans push back against the tweet from the president yesterday. sara westwood, thank you so much. so the president ignores the advice from his most senior military commanders by intervening in three highly consequential war crime cases. that's coming up. plus former president barack obama issues a warning to the 2020 democratic candidates. we'll tell you what that is. of nowhere.
do your asthma symptoms ever hold you back? about 50% of people with severe asthma have too many cells called eosinophils in their lungs. eosinophils are a key cause of severe asthma. fasenra is designed to target and remove these cells. fasenra is an add-on injection for people 12 and up with asthma driven by eosinophils. fasenra is not a rescue medicine or for other eosinophilic conditions. fasenra is proven to help prevent severe asthma attacks, improve breathing, and can lower oral steroid use. fasenra may cause allergic reactions. get help right away if you have swelling of your face, mouth, and tongue, or trouble breathing. don't stop your asthma treatments unless your doctor tells you to.
tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection or your asthma worsens. headache and sore throat may occur. haven't you missed enough? ask an asthma specialist about fasenra. if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help. we're oscar mayer deli fresh your very first sandwich,m... your mammoth masterpiece. and...whatever this was. because we make our meat with the good of the deli and no artificial preservatives. make every sandwich count with oscar mayer deli fresh. take a look at your screen as we're showing you video we just got moments ago. mark sandy, an official with the white house budget office, arriving on capitol hill. he is complying with a subpoena to answer questions about military aid to ukraine. the aid was approved by congress and placed on a temporary hold roughly one week before president trump spoke with the ukraine leader on july 25th. it of course was eventually released. cnn political analyst, margaret
talev is with us now. she's politics and white house editor at axios and ash z ranggappa. let's listen together real quickly to somebody else we're hearing from, representative jim jordan, who is talking about these closed-door hearings and what he thinks of them. >> you got some guy overheard a phone call. i'm sure he'll be a witness next week. we'll have him in an open hearing and we'll question him there. >> do you think it will be appropriate if it's true what the president was saying? >> we'll get a chance to question this guy. i'm sure the democrats -- well, i'm betting they'll bring him in for a hearing. we'll get a chance to question him in the open. we can't really talk about what he had to say because he didn't release his transcript i understand. >> okay. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> all righty. so, margaret, you know, republicans' argument up to this point has been that none of the witnesses spoke to president
trump. but david holmes overheard president trump. he heard his voice on this phone call. is this a game-changer? >> well, christi, it's an important turn of events. based on what we learned yesterday about what he said in that deposition does seem basically certain that the democrats will bring him forward for public testimony. remember what's going on now is this sort of two-track where people are deposed and then there is a public portion of the testimony. so i think that will be important. of course we'll hear from gordon sondland himself. part of what's important about what mr. holmes had to say, it again changes kind of the known world of facts and adds information that ambassador sondland had not come forth with before, so i think he's going to be pressed very hard, at least by the democrats on the committee, to explain why the story keeps changing. >> margaret, you brought me into my next question for asha because i want to talk about why
holmes' testimony was important. he heard the conversation between president trump and ambassador sondland. he confirms bill taylor's testimony that president trump's focus on himself and not on ukraine and he contends that sondland told him president trump only cares about big stuff that benefits him as opposed to ukraine itself. that he was pushing the biden investigation that guiliani was pushing as well. what does all of this mean when we look ahead to the space that sondland, ambassador sondland is in and what he's going to say on wednesday? >> yeah, so holmes is really important because he has firsthand knowledge of this call. he was sitting there and he heard -- he overheard this conversation. i just want to emphasize that because one of the big objections that the republicans have had is that everything has been hearsay. so we are getting closer to getting firsthand corroboration and information. as far as sondland, you know, he's in a little hot water
because his previous testimony even after he amended it once said that he never had any direct communications with anyone at the white house about the investigations into the bidens or 2016 election. this directly contradicts that. he would have had a follow-up call, if this is call, the day after trump spoke with president zelensky. so he has a little bit of explaining to do there. and then for president trump, of course he's not under oath, but he did say publicly that he barely knew who ambassador sondland was and this would obviously cast doubt on that claim as well. >> all righty. so, margaret, i wanted to ask you about something that stephanie grisham, white house press secretay, released after ambassador yovanovitch's testimony yesterday. she said she testified under oath that she was unaware of any criminal activity involving president trump. she wasn't on the july 25th
phone call and she had no knowledge about the pause on aid to ukraine, basically saying she didn't add anything to the conversation. what value did ambassador yovanovitch bring to the inquiry, and how, might i ask you, did president trump's simultaneous tweet about her change the narrative or the takeaway of it? >> yeah. i mean yesterday's testimony certainly had a different flavor than day one because ambassador yovanovitch was willing to talk sort of extemporaneously about her concerns about the shock value of being a career service -- foreign service and ambassador and have the president turn against you to a foreign leader. so she was able to kind of give us a world view and a look inside the ranks of the state department and the foreign service to understand how deeply shaken u.s. foreign policy and the people who carry it out have been by all of this. but it was perhaps the president's own action with that
tweet that gave kind of like the clearest picture, like unfiltered picture of how this is happening in realtime and it caused a lot of the republicans on capitol hill a great deal of concern and discomfort. they thought that was sort of an unforced error that the president ended up revealing what he's been trying to deny about making this personal or being heavy handed or, you know, being more concerned about how this all affects him than he is about the good of the country. all those arguments that the white house has been trying to tamp down, the president ended up elevating them with that tweet yesterday. there were a lot of republicans on capitol hill and inside the white house who thought that was a big mistake. >> asha, before i let you go, president trump's personal attorneys are asking the supreme court now to block this house subpoena for president trump's personal finance documents, aka of course his taxes. jay sekulow, his attorney, filed the papers yesterday and he's
arguing that allowing the subpoena to go forward, the house subpoena, that means congress is now free to investigate every detail of president trump's personal life. is that what's at stake here, or does the president just not wanting to release his taxes? >> well, the president definitely doesn't want to release the taxes, but this is essentially a separation of powers argument. the white house wants to claim that if congress exercises its oversight powers and, you know, that they're essentially -- they're suggesting that congress is on a fishing expedition to find evidence of a crime or something like that. you know, the house has broad oversight authority to request these, and i think it's going to be up to the court to decide how to balance that with the executive branch. so far the white house has lost both at the district court and in the appellate court, but this will be a pretty serious decision in terms of the balance of powers between congress and the executive branch. >> all right.
margaret talev, asha rangappa, we appreciate both of you being here. thank you. president trump has ignored advice from his defense secretary and pentagon officials and cleared three u.s. service members accused of war many crimes. cnn was there when first lieutenant clint lawrence reunited with his family. watch. now, lawrence was convicted of murder after ordering his troops to fire on three people in afghanistan. the president personally called lieutenant lawrence after he was released and the young lieutenant was appreciative of the call. >> i'd like to say thanks to president trump. i had the opportunity to talk to him today on the phone with vice president pence. he sounds just like he sounds on tv on the phone. he's actually pretty funny too
when you talk to him on the phone. it's very clear to me that vice president pence and president trump are very much in support of our military and i just -- i appreciate the whole country for everything that all of you have done. >> well, defense secretary mark esper and other senior military leaders have told the president that a presidential pardon could potentially damage the integrity of the military judicial system. the white house budget official is on capitol hill as we speak here getting ready to testify in the impeachment inquiry. we're going to talk about the history of impeachment with author frank bowman who can really walk us through what to expect here and how significant it is. stay close. tremfya® helps adults with moderate to severe
plaque psoriasis uncover clearer skin that can last. in fact, tremfya® was proven superior to humira® in providing significantly clearer skin. tremfya® may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms or if you had a vaccine or plan to. serious allergic reactions may occur. tremfya®. uncover clearer skin that can last. janssen can help you explore cost support options.
that could allow hackers devices into your home.ys and like all doors, they're safer when locked. that's why you need xfinity xfi. with the xfi gateway, devices connected to your homes wifi are protected. which helps keep people outside from accessing your passwords, credit cards and cameras. and people inside from accidentally visiting sites that aren't secure. and if someone trys we'll let you know. xfi advanced security. if it's connected, it's protected. call, click, or visit a store today.
right now white house budget official mark sandy is on capitol hill. he's expected to testify behind closed doors and explain what he knows about the president's decision to hold up aid to ukraine. >> this morning we're learning new details in fact from a witness who said he personally heard president trump demand an investigation into the bidens.
he says the president was told that the ukrainian president would do, quote, anything you asked him to, and told lawmakers that the u.s. ambassador to the eu confirmed the ukrainians were going to, quote, do the investigation. the impeachment hearings into president trump are obviously historic. this is a moment for the country. it's only the third time in 45 years that americans are witnessing this process. >> joining us to talk about the history of impeachment is frank bowman. he's a floyd r. gibson missouri endowed professor of law and the author of "high crimes and misdemeanors, a history of impeachment for the age of trump." good morning to you. >> nice to be here. >> okay. so let's start here with process. republicans have complained so much about process. you've seen some complaints during the testimony yesterday of ambassador yovanovitch. this morning this was what we heard from congressman jim jordan. >> they can keep, you know, having secret depositions down
here in the basement of the capitol, but i think the american people see through this whole thing. >> see through this whole thing. is there something to see on the other side of this? is this something that's uniquely abnormal? >> no, there's nothing abnormal here, at least in terms of taking depositions of witnesses in private before you put them on before the national audience. this is certainly something that republicans themselves did in previous times when they were investigating, for example, hillary clinton and benghazi, but more importantly, any sort of investigation, whether it's a criminal investigation, whether it's civil litigation, whether it's an impeachment investigation, the first thing you're going to do before you bring a witness in front of a public forum is you're going to depose them in advance. there's nothing abnormal about that at all. >> so there are some republicans who say the president, he has not met the criteria for impeachment. that, yes, what he did was wrong but it's not impeachable, do you
agree with that? >> no. the constitution says, of course, that presidents and other officials are impeachable for treason, bribery or other high crimes or misdemeanors. one of the principal high crimes and misdemeanors that traditionally has been impeachable is an abuse of power. and the narrative that is being laid out in increasing detail up on capitol hill is one of abuse of power. the president of the united states using the great power of the united states, the great power of his office to extort from a vulnerable front line state threatened by russian aggression, investigations or at least announcement of investigations that are favorable to his private political interest. that's a classic abuse of power and certainly it would be impeachable. now, the other thing that is being spoken of a great deal now is bribery. it's one of the specific items that can be impeachable. it's notable, i suppose, that house democrats seem to be speaking in terms of bribery. i'm not sure that's entirely
wise, but i understand why they're trying to do it because they think, i gather, that explaining bribery is somewhat more -- somewhat simpler for the average person than explaining high crimes and misdemeanors and the concept of abuse of power. but frame it how you will, the narrative that's emerging fits into either category. >> does in this case a firsthand account -- what's the value of that? because what we've heard from republicans for i guess the first month of this was that this is all secondhand. the whistle-blower didn't have any firsthand information. there is this statement that cnn has from david holmes who says he heard the phone call between gordon sondland and president trump. but is that necessary here? i mean this is a political, not a criminal proceeding. >> i think it's helpful in that it tends to diminish the effectiveness, if any, of the republicans claiming that there's no firsthand testimony
of exactly what mr. trump said about ukraine or about the aid. of course there's always the irony of the fact that to the extent that there are any missing links between the president and the conduct, it's because the president has refused to allow the people that know the most about that link, people like mick mulvaney and others, to come down and testify. i think having someone that actually overheard the president speak is certainly helpful, because it eliminates that quibble, if you will. it diminishes that component of the republicans' argument. the other thing to note is that the republican congressmen in that proceeding seem to view their role as being the president's defense lawyers, not as being congressmen who are representing not only the country but also the institution of congress in the very serious enterprise of investigating the impeachment of an american president. what they're doing, the role that they're presuming to take here is really quite unprecedented in american
history, certainly in the history of recent impeachments. in both clinton and in nixon, the president's party, while they certainly weren't happy about having a president of their party being impeached, they were insistent that the facts be produced. they then argued the implications of those facts, but they were insistent the facts be produced and they didn't venture into wild conspiracy theories or diversionary tactics the way that i fear republicans are doing now. >> all right. frank bowman, thank you for sharing your perspective with us. we appreciate it. >> my pleasure. coming up, former president barack obama wades into the 2020 political debate with a warning for the 2020 democratic candidates. if you live with diabetes, why fingerstick when you can scan? with the freestyle libre 14 day system just scan the sensor with your reader, iphone or android and manage your diabetes. with the freestyle libre 14 day system, a continuous glucose monitor, you can check your glucose levels any time,
without fingersticks. ask your doctor to write a prescription for the freestyle libre 14 day system. you can do it without fingersticks. learn more at freestylelibre.us doprevagen is the number oneild wimempharmacist-recommendeding? memory support brand. you can find it in the vitamin aisle in stores everywhere. prevagen. healthier brain. better life.
get the perfectly grilled flavors of an outdoor grill indoors, and because it's a ninja foodi, it can do even more, like transform into an air fryer. the ninja foodi grill, the grill that sears, sizzles, and air fry crisps. former president barack obama has mostly stayed out of the political fray since leaving office, but he's now weighing in on the 2020 presidential race.
this was in a room full of liberal donors. he cautioned the candidates about the dangers of leaning too far to the left. >> this is still a country that is less revolutionary than it is interested in improvement. they like seeing things improved, but the average american doesn't think that we have to completely tear down the system and remake it. and i think it's important for us not to lose sight of that. >> all right. well, he didn't name anyone. he also raised issues with some of the candidates' robust ideas on health care and immigration. he said some policy proposals have gone further than public opinion. here with me to discuss is former ted cruz communications director and cnn political commentator alice stewart and democratic strategist and cnn political commentator maria cardona. ladies, welcome back and good morning. >> good morning, victor.
>> is he right? >> i think he is right. i think that a lot of people will listen to him. he has been somebody who has not been quick to weigh in into the democratic race. he did that just now. i think that his comments will travel far and wide. but look, this is what primaries are for. i have been incredibly impressed with elizabeth warren's rise with the excitement that she brings, with the support that she brings, especially among the progressive democrats. and i think that's a great thing. and if you see what she has done recently, i think she is heeding exactly what president obama is saying in that she is offering a little bit more tempered policies. a transition to medicare for all. so i think all of these things are things that are going to be robustly discussed, have been and will continue to be during the democratic primary. that's what they're for. >> yeah, that transition plan came out published on medium yesterday. but the president saying don't go too far left, don't go past
public opinion, pace yourself. is that in conflict with this man from 2008? >> and where we are met with cynicism and doubt and those who tell us that we can't, we will respond with that timeless creed that sums up the spirit of a people. yes, we can. >> is this his own cynicism and doubt? >> i don't think so. i think in fact that is exactly what he is saying. yes, we can change things. yes, we can improve things. but you have to do it in a way that brings the american people along. frankly, for the democratic primary, that brings the majority of democratic primary voters along, which are a little bit more moderate than what the progressive left would have you believe. now that doesn't mean that we can't talk about bold ideas and bold ways to really change things, especially for those for whom the politics of the usual haven't worked. and again, i think that's what a
robust democratic primary is for. >> so, alice, let me come to you and we're using this conversation to talk about things other than impeachment that maybe didn't get as much coverage in the last day or so. the president's long-time political advisor roger stone was convicted on seven counts. several sources say the president in the lead-up to a verdict had considered whether or not he would pardon him. do you think he will? do you think he should? >> he absolutely positively should not. whether he will or not remains to be seen. nothing would surprise me. but let me just say this, no one should be in prison more than roger stone based on the dirty tricks that he has done for democrats and republicans. he is getting exactly what he deserves. the prison door couldn't hit him on the rear fast enough in my opinion. he has engaged in tactics that are simply criminal. and finally he is paying the price. he has what he calls the stone's
rules where he acts as though he is above politics and above the law. and one of the things that he has said often is stone's rules exist because the truth is too painful and lies will land you in prison. well, there you go. don't let the door hit you on the way out and by felecia. this is something that should have happened all along because of what he's done to democrats and republicans. i'm sure he'll do and say anything he can to avoid a long prison term, but no one deserves to be in prison in politics more than roger stone. >> i appreciate the bye felicia effort, but it's the bye and then felicia. you've got to hit the bye first. that was a nice try. "the washington post" was reporting that the president's doral resort was not one of the early contenders to host the g-7 according to some secret service emails they have obtained.
now we have learned that republican national committee, this from "the new york times," they will hold their winter meeting there. i don't remember your view of doral as a g-7 pick, but is this again self-dealing now, just the rnc's money? >> i -- look, i think they can choose where they want to hold these events regardless of who owns the property. >> $600,000 last year alone to the president's properties. >> i have said all along i wish there would have been more separation between the president's business dealings and events that are political. i wish they would have completely severed all business ties when he took office. however, that did not happen. but we can all agree that this is not a surprise, that this type of activity is happening. i wish there was a further separation, but at the end of the day the rnc is -- they get money from donors, and their money -- they can spending that
money exactly how they want to spending it. if it happens to be with a trump property, there's nothing folks can do about it because this money comes from donors and this is where they choose to hold these events. >> speaking to donors, maria, this new super pac promises to spend a million dollars to get senator booker, cory booker on the december debate stage. he's rejected super pacs but now he has one. former vice president joe biden rejected super pacs and now he has one. governor patrick says he'll likely need one. the president and the rnc have $300 million they have raised for this election. is there a consequence for candidates who reverse or turn the other way when democrats' primary objective is just to win? >> no, i don't think so because democrats' primary objective is just to win. that is exactly how important it is not just for democrats but
for the country to get trump out of office. now, in an ideal world, most democrats would want to have -- would want to have money out of politics, right? they have always talked about that. that has not changed. but they also know that they need to be able to compete with a president who is bringing in the type of money that trump is bringing in. and so i don't think that it will -- that it will be a consequence for them moving forward because, again, what democrats wanting most of all is to keep their eye on the ball and that is to elect a candidate who is going to be the best equipped to get the most corrupt president we've ever had in our history out of office in 2020. >> alice stewart, maria cardona, good to have you again. >> thank you so much, victor. >> thanks, victor. >> have a good weekend. it's ultimate tailgate time. you know who's in the middle of this. coy wire.
>> hey, good morning to you, christi. the florida a&m university perched atop the highest of seven hills here in tallahassee is the perfect place for our first hbcu tums ultimate tailgate. they play victor's alma mater, howard today. so stay tuned for some serious, serious trash talking. ( ♪ ) only tylenol® rapid release gels have laser drilled holes. they release medicine fast, for fast pain relief. tylenol®. those are the ones that show up and change everything.
those are the ones that show up ♪ the amount of student loan debt i have i'm embarrassed to even say i felt like i was going to spend my whole adult life paying this off thanks to sofi, i can see the light at the end of the tunnel as of 12pm today, i am debt free ♪ we have no debt, we don't owe anybody anything, and it's fantastic ♪
laso you can enjoy it even ifst you're sensitive. se. yet some say it isn't real milk. i guess those cows must actually be big dogs. sit! i said sit! dana-farber cancer institute discovered the pd-l1 pathway. pd-l1. they changed how the world fights cancer. blocking the pd-l1 protein, lets the immune system attack,
(food grunting menacingly) when the food you love doesn't love you back, stay smooth and fight heartburn fast with tums smoothies. ♪ tum tum-tum tum tums a little bit later today former nfl quarterback colin kaepernick is taking a practice field, hoping to show teams he is ready to get back into the league. >> coy wire has that and more in the bleacher report, live from tallahassee, florida. coy, good morning to you. >> reporter: good morning, victor and christi. kaepernick says he's been working out every day for three years waiting for a chance to get back into the league. well, today that time has come. a league statement thursday said that 11 team reps will be at a session and it's reported that more have confirmed since that
time. now, kaepernick, he'll be put through drills and an interview at the atlanta falcons facilities indoors. the session is closed to media but everything will be recorded so any team that's interested can get that footage. former browns head coach hue jackson and former dolphins head coach joe philbin will be running the session. nfl wide receivers will be there to catch kaepernick's passes. it is a big college football saturday. here we are at florida a&m university where the rattlers are 8-1. they have a record-setting quarterback. victor's alma mater, howard, is the opponent. they're only 1-8. the venom pom squad has a very special message for you. >> florida agricultural and mechanical university! >> i mean that was nice, but i
dana-farber cancer institute discovered the pd-l1 pathway. pd-l1. they changed how the world fights cancer. blocking the pd-l1 protein, lets the immune system attack, attack, attack cancer. pd-l1 transformed, revolutionized, immunotherapy. pd-l1 saved my life. saved my life. saved my life. what we do here at dana-faber, changes lives everywhere. everywhere. everywhere. everywhere. everywhere.
learn now genetic genealogists are teaming up with law enforcement to help crack cold cases. >> our dna carries a specific instruction set for an individual's physical characteristics. with a small sample the labs can create a facial composite that predicts what a person looks like. it's technology that can help break criminal cold cases wide open. >> it's the kind of stuff from a sci-fi movie. >> it's definitely very sci-fi. >> after being brutally beaten, 17-year-old brittany marcell was put into a coma. she lost all memory of the attack leaving police with just a single piece of evidence, a single drop of blood. for the next ten years the case went unsolved until marcell
recalled a name, justin hanson. with that blood they thinked hanson to the crime. he was convicted and sentenced to 18 years in prison. >> going forward the number of cold cases will decrease and also active cases can potentially be solved more quickly. cases won't have to go cold. >> it costs about $3,000, but the results can mean authorities spend less time and manpower to solve a case. dna can't reveal a person's age, so it estimates what a person would look like based on how long ago the crime was committed. >> basically we're predicting where the face falls on different facial dimensions and what we call face space. >> by generating leads from dna left at a crime scene as opposed to matching it to a database, it is giving law enforcement a powerful new crime fighting tool.
bit i kick myself for on a daily basis because it was not something that was becoming of a member of our family. we try and uphold the highest standards and practices, and i let the side down, simple as that. >> prince andrew's full interview will air tonight and we'll play that for you tomorrow morning right here on "new day." more than 8 million tons of plastic endi up in the world's oceans every year. a lawyer in india is taking on this global problem and he is one of cnn's top ten heroes. >> it was like a carpet of plastic. for the first time in my life i didn't want to be in the water because the garbage was like five and a half feet. the problem of pollution is created by us. with this in my mind i started to clean the beach. i told myself it will be difficult for a single man to do it. i said why not take this
personal journey to others. this huge ocean is a problem. we'll have to rise up in huge numbers. when you have a complicated problem, sometimes solutions are simple. >> to vote for your favorite top ten hero go to cnnheroes.com, and thank you for doing so. we hope you make good memories today. thanks for being with us. >> there is much more ahead in the next hour of cnn's newsroom. fredricka whitfield is up next. i suffered with psoriasis for so long. i felt gross. people were afraid i was contagious. i was covered from head to toe. i was afraid to show my skin. it was kind of a shock after... i started cosentyx. i wasn't covered anymore. four years clear. five years now. i just look and feel better. see me. cosentyx works fast to give you clear skin that can last. real people with psoriasis look and feel better with cosentyx.
don't use if you're allergic to cosentyx. before starting get checked for tuberculosis. an increased risk of infections and lowered ability to fight them may occur. tell your doctor about an infection or symptoms, if your inflammatory bowel disease symptoms develop or worsen, or if you've had a vaccine... ...or plan to. serious allergic reactions may occur. i look and feel better with cosentyx. five years is just crazy. see me. ask your dermatologist if cosentyx could help you move past the pain of psoriasis. (paul) wireless network claims america's most reliable network. the nation's largest and most reliable network. the best network is even better? best, fastest, best. enough. sprint's doing things differently. they're offering a new 100% total satisfaction guarantee. try it out and decide for yourself. now you can switch to sprint and get both an unlimited plan and the samsung galaxy s10 plus included for just $35 a month. for people with hearing loss, visit sprintrelay.com.
hello, everyone. it's 11:00 on the east coast. i'm fredricka whitfield. right now the white house office of management an budget official, mark sandy, is testifying behind closed doors on capitol hill. arriving about an hour ago for a rare saturday deposition, sandy is expected to detail what he knows about the president's decision to hold up aid to ukraine. his testimony comes after another witness gave a firsthand account of overhearing president trump demanding ukraine investigate the bi