Skip to main content

tv   Anderson Cooper 360  CNN  August 23, 2022 5:00pm-6:00pm PDT

5:00 pm
state department to actually negotiate for his release like it's been doing for americans brittney griner and paul whelan. fogel was sentenced to 14 years at a maximum security prison for possessing less than an ounce of medical marijuana. recently fogel's sister spoke to outfront and says she believes the u.s. has something up its sleeve to get her brother out. thank you so much for joining us tonight. ac 360 starts now. good evening. the u.s. embassy in ukraine is warning americans to leave the country with fears growing of escalating russian attacks in the wake of a car bombing outside moscow that took the life of the daughter of a prominent putin supporter. major developments in the mar-a-lago documents story. first, though, we begin with breaking news out of florida where primary day is over and the polls have just closed. cnn can now project two key races for the democratic nomination for governor. cnn projects the winner is
5:01 pm
congressman and former republican governor charlie crist. and in the race to oppose senator marco rubio in the fall, cnn projects the democratic nominee is congresswoman val demings. first, the documents. we know a lot more tonight about the classified material the former president was keeping at mar-a-lago, including how much of it there was, more than 700 pages, how the former president tried to hang on to it for months, and how very sensitive some of the information in it was, more sensitive than previously reported, bearing a designation limiting access to only a select few officials. the reason we know this information is because of a move by one of the former president's allies and a liaison to the national archive. a move that the ally billed as bolstering the former president's case against the fbi search. but he may have done the precise opposite and then some. >> we have new evidence. justice news has obtained
5:02 pm
correspondence between various properties during the lead-up to the raid showing that the biden white house -- that's right, joe biden's white house, the one that said they had nothing to do with this -- they were deeply involved in the early instigation of the criminal probe including clearing the way for the president, president trump's claim of executive privilege to be eviscerated, basically getting rid of his executive privilege before he could contest it. this is important stuff. this is a letter that the national archives sent to president trump's lawyers on may 10th. >> so john solomon made the letter from acting archivist deborah wohl public, and when he did, the first question many asked is why. maggie haberman tweeted, quote, confusing to assess how this helps trump. she later elaborated, quote, biggest takeaway is trump team has firmed the president had high-level, sensitive, and restricted material at his home for many months before allowing archives access to it. now, the letter dated may 10th,
5:03 pm
which the national archive subsequently confirmed by releasing, also did apply to mr. solomon a contention about president biden's role in determining whether executive privilege applied. quoting from it now, president biden defers to determination in consultation with the assistant attorney general for the office of legal counsel regarding whether or not i should uphold the former president's purported protective assertion of executive privilege. concluding, quote, the question in this case is not a close one. the letter also fails to show as john solomon claims that president trump had anything to do with the search. what it does say is that the former president had more than 700 pages of classified material at his florida resort and that some pertained to special access programs, which are created when sharing certain information beyond the very highest levels could increase the risk of it getting out and damaging national security. so that's something we did not know when the search warrant receipt came out and would not have known, at least not at this point, had this guy, john
5:04 pm
solomon, not done what he did, all of which comes at the end of a day that also saw the judge handling the former president's motion that the document review be halted and a special master be appointed to review them cast a skeptical eye on the case. the judge, whom the former president appointed, telling his attorney she wants answers by friday to some very basic questions, namely what precisely are they asking of her. how is it that she has jurisdiction? and why can't this be handled by the magistrate judge who's been dealing with the case so far? we begin with more of the letter. cnn's jessica schneider joins us with that. we now know there's more than 100 classified documents, 700 pages. that's a number we haven't heard before. >> reporter: it's not, anderson. we're seeing just how voluminous it was. this is from what they collected in january, not what they just got with this search warrant, which was even more. what we're also learning is really how the archives tried to work with trump's legal team. we see in this letter, you know, they carefully considered his claims of executive privilege. they ultimately decided he
5:05 pm
couldn't claim privilege, but they did delay handing over these 700 pages of classified documented, delayed handing it over to the fbi, intelligence communities for one month even though it says in this letter these agencies needed to do a damage assessment to determine if trump's continued possession of these at his private club, where they weren't properly secured, whether it endangered national security. even though it was john solomon who first published the letter, the archives were forced to put it out earlier today. it really does show how the archives tried to work with the former president's legal team to let them make their argument but ultimately had to release it to the fbi. >> can you explain how this was originally posted on a website run by john solomon, who is the writer who is also serving as a trump designee to the national archives? >> right. so he put it out on his website. it's called just the news.
5:06 pm
it was last night. he said he got it through old-fashioned reporting, but presumably, this could have been part of team trump's larger strategy. we've seen how they've been leaking out information they think is helpful to rile up their base even though, as i've noted, it really does show how deferential the archives were to trump's claims, and they tried to work with his attorneys. but we've seen similar leaks like this. we saw it recently with the search warrant release. trump's team put it out there to breitbart, a conservative outlet, just before the court officially did. so trump's team, it seems to be trying to get this out to maybe their allies first. >> how did the justice department react when the national archives first notified them early this year of the large volume of classified information retrieved from mar-a-lago? >> reporter: so that's really interesting because our team's reporting that actually doj initially balked at this, balked at opening a criminal investigation into these classified documents because they knew that any investigation would be viewed as political, something that we're seeing from trump's team. but as we're seeing in this letter here, these documents,
5:07 pm
especially initially, 700 classified documents, it was just too voluminous, and there were very high levels of classification that the doj really had no choice here but to open this criminal investigation. that as we've reported out is still ongoing and potentially even continues to expand here. >> jessica schneider, appreciate the reporting. cnn legal analyst and former federal prosecutor elie honig joins us now. this letter is still a little c confusing. how big a deal is it? >> this is really important, anderson, because it shows that donald trump and his team knew. it shows one of the most importants they knew, most importantly they were in possession of large amounts of highly classified information. so this letter was sent back in may, three months ago, before mar-a-lago was ever searched. in it, national archives says to trump's team, okay. you gave us 15 boxes of documents. we've now gone through them and found 700 pages of classified information. if we stacked it up on this table, that would be this high
5:08 pm
or so. there's no accident here. this isn't a couple of stray pages. this is reams of documents. and in this letter, archives says because these are so highly classified, the highest level of classification, we have to now give them to the fbi because fbi has to do damage control. and even still, trump's team, a, refused to turn over more documents, and, b, said please don't do that. please don't send them over to the fbi. >> it's essentially showing that the national archives did due diligence. >> yeah, and one of the main arguments we've been hearing from trump's team was that it was too precipitous, too sudden when you did the search. the archives tried to do this the easy way. they negotiated. they said, here's what we found. we need the rest. when that didn't work, doj got involved. they served a subpoena. trump's team still didn't do it, and only then did doj get the search warrant. >> so it sort of gives a lie to some of the former president's supporters were saying, which is, well, you know, the folks at
5:09 pm
mar-a-lago was cooperating all along. >> they're going through the motions. really what this letter makes clear is they're delaying. they keep on delaying. this letter has a sort of impatient tone. the archives says, listen, we've been as patient as we can with you. we've given you a chance to lodge your legal objections. you're not getting back to us. you just keep saying executive privilege. we don't buy your argument and we're sick of waiting. i talked about republican congressman mick mulvaney. congressman, mulvaney, it's been a couple weeks since you and i talked. in this time, has anything become clearer to you about why the former president would have had 700 pages of classified material, some of it more classified than we even realized? >> no. in fact, i think things are probably just murkier now than they were the last time we talked. the volume of the documents doesn't necessarily concern me,
5:10 pm
anderson. a lot of documents, when you work at a white house, are confidential or classified at some level, at some of the lowest levels. in fact, i could show you documents, and you'd go, why is that confidential, why is that classified? but what gets my attention are these documents we understand have been labels as tssci, which is the very highest level of top secret information, or sap, special access programs. that's the really intense stuff. that's the stuff you have to sign paperwork on to see. people are supposed to be tracking the custody of those documents. it's really, really easy to accidentally take a bunch of confidential documents. it's really, really hard to accidentally take something that's s.a.p. that's what i've sort of learned in the last couple of days. i don't know if that makes it more clear or more murky, but it is certainly new information. >> between the court filing for the spaecial master to review te documents seized from mar-a-lago, and the letter release from the national archives, the president's allies have now put out two documents that reveal new information, as
5:11 pm
i mentioned before, that do contradict explanations previously put out by either him or his attorneys or his allies, for example, that they were cooperating fully with the investigation and that he had declassified all these documents or the documents were planted by federal agents and so on. do you see a coherent legal strategy at play here? even his filing for a special master, a lot of people -- legal minds looked at those documents and said this is more of a political document than it is an actual legal filing. >> the special master makes some sense. keep in mind the president has a tough relationship with the fbi. this is the same fbi that he believes and many republicans believe that lied about him to the feisic court back during the 2016 campaign. certainly it's established that the fbi gave false information. whether or not they intentionally lied, we'll probably never know. so if doesn't surprise me that the president has a challenged
5:12 pm
relationship with the fbi. but you mentioned the claim of privilege -- excuse me -- of declassification. that's never made any sense to me. i don't remember that ever being discussed when i was in the white house, and it would be stunning to me that anybody really thought they could just sort of wave a magic wand on the way out the door and declassify stuff. it makes me wonder again the type of legal advice the president was getting as he left the white house. so you're right. we're learning a little bit, but when we do learn stuff, it makes some of the arguments the president has made look a little bit weaker. some of the stuff makes sense to me. it's going to be a very confusing couple of weeks. it's going to be made more so, i think, anderson on thursday when the judge rules on the release of the affidavit. this is something that's going to be -- >> politically, obviously we've seen a lot of folks rallying around the former president in the wake of the search at mar-a-lago. the general election's is obviously just under three months away. how do you think this investigation -- what kind of impact do you think it has? >> listen, i'm critical of the
5:13 pm
fbi. i think you had folks on your show or at least on your network who sort of leaned left who have been critical of the fbi, who said this is really just about documents, then it's an outrage. to go into a former president's home, there better be a dead body in there or a smoking gun or something, yes. sci documents are important, but do they justify a search warrant versus a subpoena? i don't know. that's a real challenging case for the fbi to make. so i think the president has managed to earn some sympathy here in the last two weeks not only from folks who might run against him in 2024, folk who's have been critical, for example, of his performance on january 6th like myself. tulsi gabbard has come to the president's defense on this. there have been left-leaning analysts who said the fbi had overreach here. it's been a strange sort of political process related to this. >> we should point out as you well know, the head of the fbi, chris wray, was appointed by former president trump, and some
5:14 pm
of the congress people who have come out, rick scott who has come out, senator rick scott calling -- referring to the fbi as gestapo is pretty stunning. it's not really necessarily fair-minded criticism, is it? >> well, you know, yeah. i didn't realize that about senator scott. i like senator scott. i have a lot of respect for him. to call anybody in the gestapo in this country is probably over the line. but certainly it's fair to criticize the fbi in this circumstance, or at least to put them under a great deal of scrutiny. i think you have to agree this is unprecedented to go into a former president's home under a search warrant. we all say that everybody is the same under the law. but i also think they we say, look, before we cross that rubicon, it better be a really, really high bar to meet. it can't be just about documents that you can get today or you could get tomorrow, you could get next week. a search warrant into a president's home is a big deal, and i think it's incumbent upon the fbi now to prove why they
5:15 pm
thought it was so important for them to be able to go into that residence. >> mick mulvaney, i appreciate your time. thank you. >> thanks, anderson. i just want to remind our viewers of exactly what senator rick scott said about the fbi search. he said, this should scare the living daylights out of american citizens, the way our federal government has gone is like what we've thought about the guess ta poe and people like that, we've got to say ourselves, this cannot be our country. much more ahead including a report for moscow regarding dari darya dugina over who is responsible for her murder. later, more on primary night now that we can project who will be taking on florida's governor and republican rising star ron desantis.
5:16 pm
new astepro allergy. now available without a prescription. astepro is the first and only 24-hour steroid free spray. while other allergy sprays take hours astepro starts workinin 30 minutes. so you can... astepro and go. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪
5:17 pm
all-electric with room for up to seven. it's the suv electric has been waiting for. the all-new eqb from mercedes-benz. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪
5:18 pm
♪ it wasn't me by shaggy ♪ you're never responsible for unauthorized purchases on your discover card.
5:19 pm
(johnny cash) ♪ i've traveled every road in this here land! ♪ ♪ i've been everywhere, man. ♪ ♪ i've been everywhere, man. ♪ ♪ crossed the desert's bare, man. ♪ ♪ i've breathed the mountain air, man. ♪ ♪ of travel i've had my share, man. ♪ ♪ i've been everywhere. ♪ ♪ i've been to: pittsburgh, parkersburg, ♪ ♪ gravelbourg, colorado, ♪ ♪ ellensburg, cedar city, dodge city, what a pity. ♪ ♪ i've been everywhere, man. ♪ ♪ i've been everywhere, man. ♪ ♪ i've been everywhere. ♪ heyyy! (steins breaking) your cousin. ♪ from boston. ♪ it means, “ok-to-beer-fest”. another sam octoberfest? nein. make it ten! i like this guy. (cheers) . the u.s. embassy in kyiv is warning american citizens to leave the country, citing concerns that russia is planning
5:20 pm
new strikes on ukrainian civilian infrastructure and government facilities. now, the warning comes in the wake of a car bomb killing of a putin ally's daughter outside moscow. russia is blaming ukrainian special services for the killing of darya dugina. ukraine denies any involvement. there's no way yet to independently assess either claim. the immediate focus is on vladimir putin's next move. quoting now from the embassy bulletin, security situation throughout ukraine is highly volatile, and conditions may deteriorate without worrying. cnn's fred pleitgen is in moscow for us tonight. >> reporter: as darya dugina's body lay in an open casket among the mourners, grief, sorrow, and also massive anger and a thirst for revenge. du dugina's father, alexander dugin, emotional, openly calling for a massive escalation of russia's invasion of ukraine. the price we have to pay can be
5:21 pm
justified by only one thing, the highest achievement, victory, he said. she lived in the name of victory, and she died in the name of victory, our russian victory, our truth, our orthodoxy, our country, and our empire. some going even further than tha that, demanding an all-out war. maybe this event in the capital will help convey the message to our government that we have to stop playing around with, quote, special military operations and that it's time to start a war, a serious war with first and foremost spiritual mobilization, a friend of darya dugina said. after darya dugina was killed when her car exploded and crashed on a moscow highway, it took the russian intelligence agency only about a day to blame ukraine, releasing video of what they claim is a ukrainian special services operative who allegedly infiltrated russia,
5:22 pm
killed dug na, and then fled to a neighboring country. those claims cannot be independently verified by cnn and ukraine's president reiterating kyiv was not behind the killing. "this is not our responsibility," volodymyr zelenskyy said. she is not citizen of our country. we are not interested in her. she is not in the territory of ukraine, occupied or not. but russia's allegations come as the war in ukraine has seemingly reached a brutal stalemate with heavy losses but few territorial gains for either side. another firebrand pro-kremlin commentator at the memorial calling for tougher action against ukraine and lashing out at the u.s. for supporting kyiv. "americans at the head of nato brought this up in ukraine, very cynically turning ukraine into anti-russia. americans don't care at all about ukraine. they're only interested in their
5:23 pm
own future. ukraine is expendable for them in a war with russia that they are preparing." >> fred, how powerful are the people now calling for an escalation of the invasion? >> reporter: well, it's quite interesting because if you speak to ordinary russians, the vast majority of them, anderson, they'll never have heard of darya dugina before or her father, alexander dugin, despite the fact that he is obviously someone who is well-known in the inner circles of russian politics. but today at that memorial event, there were a lot of prominent russians who were there, and there was a telegram that was read by vladimir putin and one that was read by russian foreign minister sergey lavrov. so in the upper echelons of russian politics, in the upper echelons of russian state-controlled media, those calls for being even tougher on ukraine, taking even more territory away from ukraine, those voices are getting louder. it's difficult to say whether or not that's something that will
5:24 pm
translate into more brutality on the battlefield, but it's certainly something that's not out of the question, anderson. >> fred flight again, appreciate it. the question of killing darya dugina is at best unanswerable at this point. russia's track record when it comes to politically motivated killings is pretty clear. randi kaye tonight takes a look at that. >> reporter: all it took was a cup of tea to dispose of former russian spy alexander litvinenko. the outspoken critic of vladimir putin died after drinking poisonous tea at a london hotel. it was laced with radioactive po lone yum 210, which is tasteless and odorless. he suffered for three weeks before dying. litvinenko blamed putin in a death bed letter read to the media. >> no respect for life, liberty, or any civilized value. you have shown yourself to be unworthy of your office.
5:25 pm
>> reporter: a british inquiry found russian agents administered the fatal poison. the kremlin has consistently denied any involvement in litvinenko's death. alexei navalny, another putin critic, nearly suffered the same fate years after speaking at this protest against vladimir putin. in august of 2020, navalny was poisoned and nearly killed, allegedly by kremlin agents using the nerve agent novichok. he fell ill on an airplane and he explained to cnn's clarissa ward. >> i went over to the flight attendant and said, i was p poisons. >> reporter: remarkably he survived. an investigation revealed later chemical weapons experts had been tracking navalny for years. is it your contention that vladimir putin must have been aware of this? >> of course.
5:26 pm
100%. it could have not been happened without direct order of putin because it's -- well, it's big scale. >> reporter: the kremlin denies involvement in the poisoning and russian officials have declined to open a criminal investigation. navalny was arrested in russia after returning from germany in january this year and has been locked away ever since on what he calls politically motivated charges of fraud and contempt of court. russian investigative journalist anna poe live skyia may have been taerled too. her book, putin's russia, had accused vladimir putin of turning russia into a police state. in 2006, she was shot at point-blank range inside her apartment building. putin denied the kremlin was involved, and five men were convicted of her murder. a judge found it was a contract killing, but the person who paid the men was never identified. years later in 2015, the assassination of russian politics boris nep sov rattled
5:27 pm
the country. he was an outspoken critic of putin's involvement in the war in ukraine's donbas region. he spoke with anthony bourdain shortly before he was killed. >> i'm well-known guy, and this is safety because if something happens with me, it will be scandal not only in moscow city but throughout the world. >> reporter: still, nep sov was g gunned down near the kremlin. he was short four times in the back. putin took over the investigation into the murder, but the killer has yet to be identified. randi kaye, cnn, palm beach county, florida. coming up tonight, a look at another critical primary night. as we indicated earlier, polls are now closed in florida where cnn is projecting congressman charlie crist has won his bid to go head to head with ron desantis in november. we're also watching the races in new york where p polls are set close e in just minutes. we'll be right back.
5:28 pm
it's time for the biggest sale of the year, on the sleep number 360 smart bed. it's temperature balancing, so you both say cool. our smart sleepers get 28 minutes more restful sleep per night. all smart beds are on sa. save 50% on the sleep number 360 limited edition smart d. ends monday ugh-stipated... feeling weighed down by a backedup gut" miralax is different. it works naturally with the water in your body to unblock your gut. your gut. and your mood will follow.
5:29 pm
bubbles bubbles so many bubbles! as an expedia member you earn points on your travels, and that's on top of your airline miles. so you can go and see... or taste or do absolutely nothing with all those bubbles. without ever wondering if you're getting the most out of your trip. because you are.
5:30 pm
pst. girl. you can do better. at least with your big-name wireless carrier. with xfinity mobile you can get unlimited for $30 per month on the nation's most reliable 5g network. they can even save you hundreds a year on your wireless bill over t-mobile, at&t, and verizon. wow. i can do better! yes you can! i can do better, too! now you really can do better! switch to the fastest mobile service - xfinity mobile. now with the best price on two lines of unlimited. just $30 a line.
5:31 pm
we are watching key primary races tonight in new york and florida. as we mentioned at the top of the broadcast, polls are now closed across florida where cnn projects congressman charlie crist won against nikki fried in a heated race to see who will challenge republican governor ran desantis. cnn also projects congresswoman val demings won the democratic
5:32 pm
nomination in the state's senate primary and will face off against marco rubio. in just minutes, polls will close in new york where a messy redistricting process has not only pushed back its congressional primaries, it's also pitted congresswoman car carolyn maloney against congressman jerry nadler. charlie crist projected to win. what does that mean just in terms of ron desantis and his possible presidential campaign? >> i mean ron desantis enters this re-election effort as the favorite, i would say. i mean, florida has really trended to be a red state. he's got a massive war chest of north of $100 million, and he's pretty popular in his home state. you know, when desantis barely won four years ago, it was actually a big democratic year, and this year looks a little more friendly to republicans. so i think it's an uphill battle for charlie crist. but to your point about him being a presidential prospect, there is no bigger name in
5:33 pm
politics not named trump right now than ron desantis. charlie crist is sort of going to have the whole democratic party focused on him to figure out how do you run against this guy that may be the 2024 republican nominee. >> charlie crist may have an advantage because he's been a republican and a governor. he was a republican governor back in 2006. >> the first time i ever covered charlie crist, he was lounging by the pool in del rey beach, florida, with romney's team at the 2012 debates. then of course he soon showed up at the capitol as a democrat. it's kind of an interesting strange place to be. but i suppose the reality with florida trending the way that it is, it may not actually be a bad thing necessarily. i mean, i think he at least, you know, democrats in this primary seem to have picketed electability or their perception of electability over nikki fried and her sort of more progressive attitudes. so who knows? stranger things have happened in our politics. >> charlie crist has made statements in the past about
5:34 pm
being pro-life. he's appointed conservative justices to the florida supreme court. >> he's been on all sides of all the issues. he also doesn't have a very good record recently in statewide races. he's run twice and lost twice. you know, i think his emergence is a sign of a real sort of weak democratic party in florida and a weak democratic -- the fact that they're going to charlie crist. when i saw he was running, i was like, wait. is this the past? he's run before. he's running again? so we'll see what he's able to do in this race, but i think ron desantis goes into this with a head of steam. his approval ratings are above 50%. he's got a real grip on that state, and he's trying to take this victory and propel him into a place in 2024. you say that democrats are looking at charlie crist and hoping he can do well against ron desantis. donald trump probably also looking at charlie crist and hoping that he can maybe eliminate -- >> does the idea that ron desantis might run for president
5:35 pm
for 2024, does that hurt his chances of getting re-elected as governor at all? >> bill clinton has this expression, don't look ahead to the next race. focus on the one in front of you. i think ron desantis will heed those words. if he falters in some way, that has a devastating effect on his presidential prospects. but he's out there testing the national waters as well, and now it's going to be his opportunity to prove to the donor class and the grass democrroots that he c execute. >> is florida solidly red? >> look, i think it's moving. i think we have to be careful about making any blanket assumptions in the environment in which we live. but the reality is our partisan divisions are getting deeper, and florida has been, you know, trending in a way that, you know, i see it -- i don't think it's going to become a place where democrats can reliably win anytime in the near future. it doesn't necessarily prevent a surprise here and there. but i think in a strong republican year like this one,
5:36 pm
with a democratic incumbent in the white house who's got low popularity numbers, it's hard to see it being anything other than that. >> was it gill am who ran against desantis. he came pretty close. >> so much money and attention on that race. the polls seem to suggest that andrew gillum would win that race. you see something different this go-round. not as much money, not as much attention, not as much hope in this race among democrats. the idea of whether or not it's red or not, democrats think it's much redder than maybe we are willing to say on this panel, and they are sort of showing that by not investing in races. >> desantis has become a much different figure in the time that he's been florida governor. he's become nationally known. he's picked fights with walt disney. he's become a celebrity on fox news. you know, when he first became the republican nominee for governor, everyone honestly was a little confused about this house member who came seemingly out of nowhere. people weren't terribly confident that frankly he could
5:37 pm
win, and he did almost lose when he first ran for governor. i just think the landscape is so much different for him now. >> you also have redistricting playing a role. >> these liberal lions of new york city democratic politics, for 30 years they've been sitting in the house together. now due to the quirks of redistricting, they have found themselves put in the same district and are battling out this political death match. it's gotten real nasty. one of them will be out of a job. perhaps both. there is a third candidate in the race. we'll see as the results come in. jerry nadler as "the new york times" endorsement, the endorsement from chuck schumer, the majority leader. we'll see if those get him across the finish line here in this race. but this is not how either one of those members congress was looking to leave congress. >> thanks so much. still ahead, i'll speak with democratic nominee for texas,
5:38 pm
governor beto o'rourke on what tonight's primary elections could mean for the future and also his new book on voting rights.
5:39 pm
we're a different kind of dentistry. one who believes in doing anything it takes to make dentistry work for your life. so we offer a complete exam and x-rays free to new patients without insurance - everyday. plus, patients get 20% off their treatment plan. we're on your corner and in your corner every step of the way. because your anything is our everything. aspen dental. anything to make you smile. book today at, walk in, or call 1-800-aspendental.
5:40 pm
we reduce homelessness, address mental health, provide spaces for addiction to be broken, create spaces of healing and restoration. for the first time ever, prop 27 will provide permanent funding for organizations like ours. saying yes to prop 27 means more people get the assistance that they nee they get someone to partner in such a way to see transformation come to them. yes on prop 27, because there's no place like home.
5:41 pm
as i mentioned, cnn projects congressman charlie crist has won the democratic primary for florida governor. he'll now challenge ron desantis, the current governor and potential presidential contender. my next guest is running to
5:42 pm
become the governor of texas. joining me now is former texas congressman, former presidential candidate, now the democratic nominee for governor, beto o'rourke. his new book "we've got to try: how the fight for voting rights makes everything else possible," is on sale now. congressman, i want to talk about the book and your run in texas. i do want to ask you about the race in florida for charlie crist to challenge ron desantis for governor there. desantis clearly has presidential ambitions. what do you think of him as a leader and a possible presidential candidate? >> you know, i leave this one to the people of florida. i knew governor desantis really at a distance. we were both elected to congress in the same year, 2012. didn't really see much of each other on the floor of the house and i've just been watching him now again at a distance from texas. but for us in this state, it is all texas, all the time. so i wish the people of florida the best, but we are running the
5:43 pm
race of our lives in what i think is the most consequential election in america in 2022. as you know, anderson, we have a total ban on abortion beginning at conception with no exception for rape or incest. that goes into effect this week in a state that has the highest level of maternal mortality in the country, three times as deadly for black women. that's on top of 13 weeks since the school shooting in uvalde with nothing changed as we go into this next -- >> i want to ask you about abortion. you mentioned uvalde. we've been trying to get answers, and i know families in uvalde are desperate for answers about what really happened with the police response. do you have any faith in the investigations that are now ongoing that those families will get the truth? >> it sure looks like a cover-up from the governor, who as you know, greg abbott, the day after that shooting, said to the families, it could have been worse. >> right. he says he was misinformed essentially by someone who wasn't actually there, and he
5:44 pm
feels misled, and he's outraged by that. but he hasn't been out in front talking about this stuff anymore. >> that's right, and he hasn't told us exactly who misled him, what the role of the state troopers, the department of public safety was. turns out there were more than 100 armed officers on the scene by the end of that, waiting more than 70 minutes on the other side of an unlocked door. and you're absolutely right. those families, who i'm in constant contact with, want answers. they want justice, and they also want action so that no other family has to experience the grief and the loss that they're living through right now. 13 weeks and counting, we've seen nothing from greg abbott. this is clear to all of us in texas. we need change if we're going to expect anything different going forward. >> on abortion, obviously it may be different this time, but that has not been, you know, in exit polls when voters at any race are asked about what are the issues they're voting on, abortion has not been at the top of that list.
5:45 pm
do you think that is different this time in texas? >> i know it is, and it probably wasn't on anyone's list going into kansas, right, where you saw near presidential election turnout levels for a referendum in the middle of the summer, a 60-40 victory for reproductive freedom in that state. and that's one where donald trump won by more than he did here in texas, where it is now completely outlawed with no exception for rape or incest. i see this, anderson, on the ground and not just in the obvious places like dallas or austin or houston or here in el paso. i see it in places like madisonville and greenville and dumas. i see it all over the state of texas. this is an issue that transcends partisanship, geography, anything else. and as you probably know, it was texas women who won protection for this right back in 1973. jane roe, sarah whittington, linda coffey. those three women prevailed upon an all-male united states supreme court to win roe v.
5:46 pm
wade. i know it's going to be texas women again in 2022 who win protection for this right back. we have our own referendum in texas. it's the governor's race. >> your book is called "we've got to try." you're highlighting a fight for voting rights across generations in texas. where do you rank access to voting in terms of problems facing america right now? we are seeing not only legislatively but at the -- you know, at the ballot box, we see election deniers running in some states in order to actually run the elections in those states or communities. >> this is our moment of truth. you know, 246 years in this experiment that defies the rule of human history is totally exceptional, might as lincoln warned us, perish from this earth. the last great hope unless we fight to get it back. this book tells the story of people who have done that in our history right in texas. lawrence nixon, who rose up against the white primary law that for bade african americans
5:47 pm
from voting in our elections from 1923 to 1944 to signal united states supreme court victories, one that integration along with others including lonnie smith of houston, and set the ground for lbj to sign the voting rights act in 1965. so we've been up against tougher odds, and we've overcome them before. not only is this possible, we've done it. now we've got to do it again, but it's going to take everything from all of us. all we've got with what we have, where we are. that's what this moment calls for, and i see that happening all across texas and certainly in these stories that i tell in "we've got to try." >> you write about a texas elections bill passed into law last year. you write, the goal of this bill wasn't to ensure election integrity. the goal was to finish what had been started on january 6th. just to be clear, governor abbott has said the bill bolsters trust and confidence in texas elections and makes it harder for fraudulent votes to be cast. so what do you mean exactly? >> in march of this year, 13% of
5:48 pm
the mail-in ballots cast in texas were rejected. if you were to report to your viewers tonight that there was an election in venezuela and 13% of the ballots cast were rejected, we'd say, well, that checks out. it's not a real democracy. for that to happen in texas, for a 95-year-old world war ii veteran to be one of those whose ballots was rejected tells you everything you need to know about the state of democracy in texas today. i'd love for the department of justice to come and ride to the rescue or for the house and the senate to pass federal voting rights protections to shore up the voting rights act. but we can't hold our breath. this one is on us here in texas, and the signal is out to everybody across this state to step up, join this campaign, knock on doors, and reach the voters targeted for suppression and intimidation and make them the margin of victory on the night of november 8th. we've got to win this to save our democracy. >> beto o'rourke, i appreciate your time tonight. thank you. >> thank you. >> the new book is called "we've got to try."
5:49 pm
coming up, a jury decision in the federal case against two men accused of conspiring to kidnap michigan governor gretchen whitmer, next.. new astepro allergy. now available without a prescription. astepro is the first and only 24-hour steroid free spray. while other allergy sprays take hours asteo starts working in 30 minutes. so you can... astepro and go.
5:50 pm
my active psoriatic arthritis can slow me down. now, skyrizi helps me get going by treating my skin and joints. along with significantly clearer skin, skyrizi helps me move with less joint pain, stiffness, swelling, and fatigue. and skyrizi is just 4 doses a year after two starter doses. skyrizi attaches to and reduces a source of excess inflammation that can lead to skin and joint symptoms. with skyrizi, 90% clearer skin and less joint pain is possible. serious allergic reactions and an increased risk of infections or a lower ability to fight them may occur. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms,
5:51 pm
had a vaccine, or plan to. with skyrizi, there's nothing like the feeling of improving my skin and joints... ...and that means everything. now's the time to talk to your doctor about how skyrizi can help treat your psoriatic arthritis- so you can get going. learn how abbvie can help you save. ["only wanna be with you" by hootie & the blowfish] discover is accepted at 99% of places in the u.s. ["only wanna be with you" by hootie & the blowfish] with xfinity internet, you get advanced security that helps protect you at home and on the go. you feel so safe, it's as if... i don't know... evander holyfield has your back.
5:52 pm
i wouldn't click on that. hey, thanks! we got a muffin for ed! all right! you don't need those calories. can we at least split it? nope. advanced security that helps protect your devices in and out of the home. i mean, can i have a bite? only from xfinity. nah. unbeatable internet. made to do anything so you can do anything.
5:53 pm
a federal judge today found two men guilty of conspiring to kidnap democratic governor gretchen whitmer. both face a maximum of life in prison. governor whitmer said the verdict proves that violence and threats have no place in our politics. it also represents another victory for the federal government's attempts to fight domestic terrorism. jean casarez has details on the verdict. >> reporter: two men convicted of conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction and kidnap the governor of michigan, gretchen whitmer, now facing the possibility of life in prison. >> the verdict confirms this was very serious, very dangerous. >> reporter: prosecutors say in the summer of 2020, adam fox and barry croft jr. went to the governor's vacation home with co-conspirators to plan an attack. a witness testified one idea was to kidnap whitmer and put her adrift on a boat in lake michigan. another idea was to try her for
5:54 pm
treason. >> the defendants in this case believed that their anti-government views justified violence. today's verdict is a clear example that they were wrong in that assessment. >> reporter: adam fox, who prosecutors say was the ringleader, bought a taser and ordered $4,000 of explosives from an undercover fbi agent. prosecutors say the two were part of a group training in combat tactics, practicing assaulting cars with rifles and live ammo, detonating bombs and trying to recruit others. you can't just strap on an ar-15 and body armor and go snatch the governor. you can't snatch anybody, and you certainly can't make bombs that are meant to maim and kill people, a prosecutor said during closing arguments. an fbi informant known as big dan was a key witness. he said he was with the two men when they conducted surveillance at the governor's summer home. prosecutors say they plotted to
5:55 pm
blow up a bridge to make it harder for law enforcement to respond to the kidnapping. >> no governor, no public official should have to contend with what governor whitmer contended with here. >> reporter: the defense argued entrapment, saying croft didn't actually agree to the kidnapping and was being targeted for his extreme anti-government views. they'd like to lock him up in a cage, not because he committed this crime but because they're afraid of the things that have come out of his mouth, croft's lawyer said. adam fox's attorney said, he talked a big game, but talk is just talk. adam fox took no affirmative steps to achieve the ends. an earlier trial ended in a hung jury, but this time the jurors didn't buy it. >> this isn't the outcome we wanted, right, but there's more work to be done. >> reporter: in 2020, governor whitmer blamed incendiary political rhetoric for giving groups like these a green light for violence. >> stand back and stand by.
5:56 pm
hate groups heard the president's words not as a rebuke but as a rallying cry, as a call to action. >> reporter: whitmer saying in a statement after the verdict, those who seek to divide us will be held accountable. plots against public officials and threats to the fbi are a disturbing extension of radicalized domestic terrorism. so this was a retrial, anderson, and it was a fast verdict. i mean, they just started deliberating yesterday, and it was a much shorter trial. the defense says that they're going to appeal, of course. but it was a different jury, which is fascinating. and the defense says that there is an issue with the jury and they can't comment on it because it is sealed with the court. but i heard the judge today in court, because we were able to listen, he invited the defendant to make a motion to unseal what this issue is. we don't know if it's significant, not significant, but it definitely will be an issue on appeal.
5:57 pm
>> appreciate it. thank you so much. we'll be right back. tide pods ultra oxi one ups the cleaning power of liquid. can it one up whatever they're doing? for sure. seriously? one up the power of liquid, one up the toughest stains. any further questions? uh uh! one up the power of liquid with tidpods ultra oxi. heyyy! (steins breaking) your cousin. ♪ from boston. ♪ it means, “ok-to-beer-fest”. another sam octoberfest? nein. make it ten! i like this guy. (cheers) bubbles bubbles so many bubbles! as an expedia member you earn points on your travels, and that's on top of your airline miles. so you can go and see...
5:58 pm
or taste or do absolutely nothing with all those bubbles. without ever wondering if you're getting the most out of your trip. because you are. meet ron. that man is always on. and he's on it with jardiance for type 2 diabetes. his underhand sky serve? on fire. his grilling game? on point. and his a1c? ron is on it. with the once-daily pill, jardiance. jardiance not only lowers a1c... it goes beyond to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death for adults with type 2 diabetes and known heart disease. and jardiance may help you lose some weight. jardiance may cause serious side effects, including ketoacidosis that may be fatal, dehydration that can lead to sudden worsening of kidney function, and genital yeast or urinary tract infections. a rare life-threatening bacterial infection in the skin of the perineum could occur. stop taking jardiance and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of this infection, ketoacidosis, or an allergic reaction,
5:59 pm
and don't take it if you're on dialysis. taking jardiance with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. a once-daily pill that goes beyond lowering a1c? on it with jardiance. ask your doctor about jardiance. ♪ ♪ aleve x. its revolutionary rollerball design delivers fast, powerful, long-lasting pain relief. aleve it, and see what's possible. football, housewives, football, housewives, football, housewives... whoops. oh no... the housewives are on the field. i repeat, the housewives are on the field. i just want to talk! yeah! who flips a table? get your tv together with the best of live and on demand. call 1-800-directv
6:00 pm
that's it for us. the news continues. >> i want to hand it over to laura coates and cnn tonight. >> no jupiter news? nothing we can build off tonight. thanks a lot, anderson. fine. i appreciate it. i'm laura coates and this is cnn tonight. and here we go. another election night in america as we are inching our way much closer now to the midterm elections, which will of