tv British Prime Ministers Questions CSPAN November 29, 2015 9:00pm-9:34pm EST
he also discusses technology, technology competition, and microsoft, and the importance of civics in american life. >> it is work that all of us should and must do to make our communities operate more efficiently. to make our communities serve citizens in a better way. it super important. up next, prime minister david cameron's answers to questions, followed by the new hampshire democratic party dinner. later, a q&a with ronald feinman.
>> order, questions to the prime minister. >> here, here. >> thank you mr. speaker. before i start, i would like to say something. everyone in this house and many people watching at home will know from "yes, prime minister" the central role that bernard, the prime minister's principal private secretary, plays in the life of the prime minister and of no. 10 downing street. this morning, my bernard, my principal private secretary, chris martin, died of cancer. chris martin was only
42. he was one of the most loyal, hard-working, dedicated public servants that i have ever come across. i have no idea what his politics were, but he would go to the ends of the earth and back again for his prime minister, for no. 10 and for the team he worked for. today, we are leaving the seat in the officials' box, where he used to sit, empty as a mark of respect to him. we think of his wife, zoe, his family and the wider no. 10 familybecause it is a bit like a family and we feel we have lost someone between a father and brother to all of us. whatever happens, we will never forget him. this morning, i had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others, and, in addition to my duties in this house, i shall have further such meetings later today. fiona bruce: may i first echo the prime minister's sentiments regarding the passing of chris martin? i am sure that all members will send their heartfelt thoughts and prayers today, and we would be grateful if they could be conveyed to his family at this time.
visyon, the excellent children's mental health charity in congleton, tells me that the lack of a secure family life is a root cause of many of the problems. experienced by the children it helps. the prime minister is a champion of family life, so will he confirm that announcements to be made later today will pass his family test by providing security for family relationships and opportunities for vulnerable children? pm cameron: i thank my hon. friend for her remarks. there will be condolence books in no. 10, and in the treasury and the security service, where chris martin also worked. she is absolutely right to say that families are the best welfare state that we have. they bring up our children, they teach us the right values and they care for us when we are sick and unwell. we want to help families, and the chancellor will have something to say about that later as we boost the national living wage, as we deliver tax cuts for working people and, crucially, as we help with childcare. as i have said before, all these policies should pass the test of helping
britain's families. jeremy corbyn: on behalf of the opposition, may i also express my condolences to the family of chris martin on his death? the prime minister told me how ill he was on remembrance sunday, and i am pleased that he was able to visit him at that time. also, on behalf of the many members who worked with chris martin when we were in government, i would like to say how much we appreciate the professional work that he did in the very highest and best traditions of the civil service in this country. it would be very helpful if our condolences could be passed on. this week, 55 labour councils have made a commitment for their areas to be run entirely on green energy by 2050. with the paris climate talks just days away, will the prime minister join me in commending those councils, and will he call on all conservative councils to do the same? pm cameron: i certainly commend all councils for wanting to promote green energy, and we have made that easier in our country by having the feed-in tariffs and the other measures,
particularly solar power and wind power. we will be taking part in the paris talks because it is absolutely vital to get that global deal, but we have to make sure that we take action locally as well as globally. i would make the point that if you compare the last parliament with the previous parliament, we saw something like a trebling of the installation of renewable electricity. jeremy corbyn: the commitment of those labour councils is a bit of a contrast with the prime minister's performance, because he used to tell us that his government were the greenest government ever. does he remember those days? does he agree with the energy secretary that britain is likely to miss its target of getting 15% of our energy from renewables by 2020? pm cameron: first of all, i believe that the previous government does rightly claim
that record: the world's first green investment bank pioneered in britain; a trebling of renewable energy; a meeting of all our climate change targets; contributing to an eu deal that means we go to the climate change conference in paris with a very strong european record; and the ability to say to other countries that they should step up to the plate. also, in the previous parliament we spent record sums. helping developing countries to go green. in the next five years, we will be spending $9 billion on helping other countries, which will be crucial in building the paris deal next week. jeremy corbyn: the problem with the prime minister's answer is that the gap between britain's 2020 target and our current share of renewable energy is the biggest in the european union.
some of the decisions he has made recently include cutting support for solar panels on home and industrial projects, scrapping the green deal, cutting support for wind turbines, putting a new tax on renewable energy, increasing subsidy for diesel generators. is it any wonder that the chief scientist of the united nations environment programme has criticised britain for going backwards on renewable energy? pm cameron: the facts paint a different picture. as i said, the trebling of wind power in the previous parliament is an enormous investment. the right hon. gentleman makes a point about solar panels. of course, when the cost of manufacturing solar panels plummets, as it has, it is right to reduce the subsidy. if we do not reduce the subsidy, we ask people to pay higher energy bills, something i seem to remember the labour party in the previous parliament making rather a lot of. if you look at the speech by the secretary of state for climate change, you can see the right balance between affordable energy and making sure we meet our green targets. that is what we are committed to. in
addition, we are building the first nuclear power station in our country for decades, something that the labour party talked about a lot in government but we are putting into action now that we are in government. jeremy corbyn: in the past few weeks, 1,000 jobs have been lost in solar companies in britain as they have gone bust. i have a question from some apprentice solar fitters at banister house, a large community energy project. ziggy, israel and jay say that cutting feed-in tariffs means stopping solar projects that are needed to help our environment and to give us jobs. they asked the prime minister this: "why do you want to throw all this away?" pm cameron: we are doubling investment in renewable energy in this parliament. as for solar panels, i think i am right in saying that in the previous parliament over 1 million homes were fitted with solar panels. it is right that we go on supporting that industry, but we should do it recognising that the cost of manufacturing solar panels has plummeted. therefore, the subsidy should be what is necessary to
deliver solar power, not what is necessary to pump up the bills of hardworking families. jeremy corbyn: that is not much help to those who are losing their jobs in the solar industry at the present time. i would like to ask the prime minister something else. today is the international day for the elimination of violence against women. on average, two women a week are killed by a current or former partner, and domestic violence accounts for up to a quarter of all violent crime. will the prime minister please explain why one third of those referred to women's refuges in england are now being turned away? pm cameron: we have put more money into refuges and the chancellor will have something to say in his autumn statement about funding women's charities. the fact is that when it comes to rape crisis centres, which we have protected, or domestic violence centres that we help to fund, the government have a good record on helping women and
making sure that the crime of domestic violence is properly investigated by the police and prosecuted in our courts. jeremy corbyn: the late denise marshall, who was chief executive of the domestic violence charity eaves, put this very well when she said: "if you are a woman who has experienced some form of violence, i believe you have the right to the very best service and the community owes you an opportunity to recover". in 2012, the prime minister's government signed the istanbul convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence. this would make women's support services statutory and would have stopped the closure of eaves. can the prime minister please tell the house when he will ratify the istanbul convention? pm cameron: we are going one further than that, and in the autumn statement the right hon. gentleman will hear in a minute that we are actually going to be putting more money into women's charities, including charities
that fight domestic violence, that fight rape and that make sure that we cut out these appalling crimes in our country. in addition to that, we have done more than any previous government to help prevent forced marriage and prevent the horrors of female genital mutilation, which do not just happen in nigeria and countries in north africathey happen here in our country, too. i do not think any government before this one have got a stronger record on those grounds. maria caulfield: many of my constituents come to my surgery desperate to be able to own their home. many of them are on a low income and they recognise that a monthly mortgage payment will be significantly lower than their current monthly rental paymentssometimes it will be up to 50% lower. does my right hon. friend therefore share the excitement of many of my constituents about the starter homes initiative contained in the housing and planning bill,
which will see affordable housing lower the monthly outgoings of many people in this country? pm cameron: i do share my hon. friend's enthusiasm for that. clearly, there are lots of individual interventions we can make, such as help to buy, which has put buying homes within the reach of many more people by reducing the deposits they need. we can help people to save, which we do with our help to buy isa, whereby we are contributing every time people make a saving. but the biggest contribution we can make is by building more houses, which we are going to be doing during this parliament, and, crucially, by maintaining a strong, secure and stable economy with low interest rates, so that people can afford to take out a mortgage. angus robertson: may i begin by associating the scottish national party with the condolences sent by the prime minister? having spoken to him last week, i am aware of how much of a personal loss this is to him, as of course it is to chris martin's family and friends. the fatal dangers of unintended consequences and escalation in
syria are clear for everybody to see in these days. all serious observers agree that an air campaign alone will not lead to the ultimate defeat of daesh on the ground and that ground forces will be needed. how many troops, and from which countries, does the prime minister have in his plan for syria? pm cameron: first, i thank the right hon. gentleman for his remarks about chris martin, whom i know helped all parties in this house when they had inquiries. let me deal very directly with the syria issue and the question the right hon. gentleman asked, because this is so crucial. i am not for one minute arguing that action from the air alone can solve the very serious problem we have with isil. clearly, we need a political settlement in syria and a government in syria who can act comprehensively with us against isil. the question for the house, which we need to address tomorrow and in the days to come, is: should we waitcan we afford to waitfor that political settlement before we act? my view is: no, we cannot
wait for that political settlement. we should work as hard as we can for it, but we should be acting now, with allies, because this is about keeping our own people and our own country safe. he asked specifically about ground troops. the fact is that there are troops in syriathe free syrian army and the kurdish forceswho would work with us to help eliminate isil, but of course the full range of ground troops will be available only when there is a political settlement in syria. but the question is simple: can we afford to wait for that political settlement before taking action to keep us safe here at home? my answer to that is: no, we cannot afford to wait. angus robertson: the united kingdom spent 13 times more on bombing libya than on investing in its reconstruction after the overthrow of the gaddafi regime. reconstructing syria will be essential to securing stability and allowing refugees to return. how much does the prime minister estimate this will cost? how much has he allocated from the uk?
pm cameron: obviously, we have one of the largest development budgets anywhere in the world, as the support that we have given to the syrian refugees, which stands at £1.2 billion, demonstrates. clearly, part of our plan, which i will set out tomorrow in a statement in this house, will be to help fund the reconstruction and rebuilding of syria alongside the political deal that we believe is necessary. i would far rather spend the money on reconstructing syria than on supporting people who are kept away from their homes and their country and who dearly want to return. richard drax: i know that my right hon. friend is aware of the growing chorus of concern surrounding the conviction of alexander blackman, the former royal marine non-commissioned officer who shot a fatally wounded insurgent in afghanistan in 2011. if there is indeed new evidence and if, as many feel, there has been a miscarriage of justice, does my right hon. friend agree it is right that this matter should be looked into again?
pm cameron: this is exactly why the criminal cases review commission existsto look at where there is or may have been a miscarriage of justice. as my hon. friend knows, we gave the internal report of the naval services to sergeant blackman's legal advisers, so there is proper disclosure in this case. the legal team says that it is looking at the option of applying to the criminal cases review commission. while we are on this point, let me say that our royal marines have a worldwide reputation as one of the world's elite fighting forces. they have made an incredible contribution to our country, and we should pay tribute to them. margaret ferrier: the government's handling of child sexual abuse inquiries has done little to instil public confidence so far. last month, the goddard inquiry announced that it had accidentally and permanently deleted all the
victim testimonies submitted through its website over an 18-day period without anyone from the inquiry ever reading them. these victims. deserve justice and for their voices to be heard. will the prime minister please tell the house what independent investigation has taken place to establish the cause of the data loss, and whether or not there was any criminality behind it? pm cameron: i am sure the whole house will welcome the fact that the goddard inquiry is now up and running. the best way to get justice for these victims. is to make sure that we have the full and independent inquiry that we have spoken about. as for the specific issue that the hon. lady raises, it is a matter for the inquiry. if there is further detail that i can give her, i will certainly write to her. what matters is that this inquiry is now up and running. robert jenrick: three thousand jobs in newark were lost under labour. this month, we celebrate the creation of the 10,000th new job in newark since 2010. does
the prime minister agree that, once again, newark leads the way to a strong economy, high employment, higher wages and lower welfare? pm cameron: i am delighted to hear that newark has met that landmark. it is worth remembering that this figure of 10,000 represents 10,000 people, each with a job and livelihood and a chance to support their families. i well remember visiting my hon. friend's constituency. i cannot promise to visit it as many times in this parliament as i did in the previous one, but i know that a business we visited called knowhow last week announced the creation of more than 800 jobs. as ever, where newark leads, i am sure that others will follow. emily thornberry: has the prime minister ever heard of shaquan sammy-plummer, alan cartwright,
stefan appleton, or vaso kakko? they are all teenagers stabbed to death on the streets of islington in the past year. vaso was murdered just two days ago. given the growing culture of drugs, gangs and violence in my borough and many boroughs like it, does the prime minister really think it is in the interests of the safety and security of my constituents to cut the metropolitan police? pm cameron: first, every life lost in the way that the hon. lady talks about is of course a tragedy, and many of these lives have been lost because of drugs, gangs and knife crime. overall, knife crime has come down over the past few years, which is welcome, but there are still too many people carrying a knife and not recognising that it is not only against the law but an enormous danger to themselves as well as to others. we will continue with our tough approach on knife crime and with the work that we are doing to disband and break up gangs and to try to
deal with the problems. of drugs. in london we have actually seen an increase in neighbourhood policing, and the metropolitan police have done a good job at cutting back-office costs and putting police on our streets. steve double: after many years of neglect under labour, cornwall is once again seeing investment in our roads, railways, airport and tourism. cornwall is ambitious to diversify its economy and become a centre for the uk aerospace industry; indeed, newquay airport is the forerunner to be the location of the uk spaceport. will the prime minister please provide an update on the decision for the spaceport, and does he agree that newquay would be the perfect place for it? pm cameron: it is good that this parliament contains such strong voices for cornwall, speaking up for that county and ensuring that it gets the assistance, resources and help that it needs. i am a strong supporter of newquay airport, not just as a user but because it provides the opportunity for a hub of
great businesses in cornwall. we want to become the european hub for spaceflight, which will help to attract further investment in the uk and create jobs. a number of other airports are in the running, and i wish them all well. we aim to launch the selection process next year. siddiq: the government and i disagree about much of what constitutes progress on gender equality, but i agreed with the prime minister last year when he pledged to change the law to include mothers on marriage certificates. i have heard nothing since. with the fast-approaching birth of my daughter, i would like to be valued equally in her life with my husband, so will the prime minister take the important and symbolic step to ensure that mothers are not written out of history?
pm cameron: this is an area on which the hon. lady and i agree. my understanding is that proposals for that legislation have gone to the relevant committee in government, and she has made an articulate case for why such a bill should be included in the next session. stuart: will the prime minister join me in commending the french government for facing down terror and continuing with the climate summit in paris next week? will he acknowledge the important role of legislators such as those at the globe summit on 4 and 5 december, and does he agree that his personal presence in paris sends a message to the world about our continuing commitment to a lasting climate deal? pm cameron: i am grateful for what my hon. friend says. i will be going to paris for the start of this vital conference to set out what britain and the european union will be doing to bring about that deal. as i have said, what we put on the table
in terms of climate financenearly $9 billion over the next five yearsis one of the most generous offers made by any country anywhere in the world. the good news about the paris conference is that, unlike with the kyoto deal, china and america will be signatories to the deal, which means that many more of the world's emissions will be covered by it. we must work hard to ensure that it is a good deal with proper review clauses, and we need a way of tightening any deal to ensure that we keep to the 2° target. that is the task, but nobody should be in any doubt that britain is playing a leading role, and has led by example and with money. caroline flint: there will never be a future where we do not need steel, but the government are spending millions of pounds to compensate for the loss of uk steelmaking. will the prime minister send a clear signal today to potential investors in our uk steel industry that he will do whatever it takes to back a sustainable, cutting-edge uk steel industry in the future? we want more steel that is used in the uk and across the world
to be stamped "made in britain". pm cameron: i completely agree with the right hon. lady. we want to support our steel industry, which is why we are taking action on procurement. if we consider what we have done through our royal navy, and what we can do through railtrack and other organisations, we should back british steel. we will also exempt heavy energy users such as british steel from the higher electricity charges, and that rather goes to the questions asked by the leader of the opposition. if we endlessly push up bills for everybody else, it costs even more to exempt the high energy users, and that is why we need a balanced programme. everything that we can do to help british steel including a clear infrastructure plan that the house will hear a bit more about in a momentis all to the good. mark garnier: in 2010, unemployment in wyre forest stood at around 5% of the
working population, but it has 1.6%, does my right hon. friend agree that to help those who are still unemployed, and to boost productivity and wages in places such as wyre forest, we should offer more opportunities for skills and training? what more can the government offer to help places such as wyre forest? pm cameron: our vision is that all young people aged 18 should have a real choice of either being able to take on an apprenticeship, 3 million in be able toment, or go to one of our universities. we do not want anybody left behind; everyone should have that choice. my hon. friend is right that unemployment has fallen in his constituency, as around the country. we will hear from the chancellor in a minute about what has happened over the past five years, but the fact is that britain, over those five years, has grown as fast as any other g7 country in terms. of our economic performance. we can now look back and see that the decisions made in 2010, 2011 and 2012 were difficult decisions but they laid the platform for
sustained economic growth and jobs. hussain: education in bradford is facing a funding and school places crisis, and we remain at the bottom of the league tables. bradford's children cannot be failed any longer, so will the prime minister support my call for a bradford challenge based on the highly successful london challenge, and will he stop the dangerous changes to the schools funding formula that will drag the children of bradford further into the land of inequality, despair and neglect? pm cameron: we made commitments at the last election about funding our schools and funding school places, and we will be keeping to all those commitments, not just in the revenue that we provide to schools, where we will not be reducing the amount that goes in per pupil, but also in spending
much more on new school places in this parliament than in the parliament that preceded my becoming prime minister. we are also helping with building new academy chains and new free schools, and they are available for the hon. gentleman's constituency as for others. tredinnick: does my right hon. friend agree that the turmoil in northern iraq and syria gives opportunities to resolve long-standing international disputes, not least with russia? does he agree that the attack on the russian bomber, something that never happened in the whole of the duration of the cold war, was disproportionate, and will he make absolutely sure that we do not get into a conflict with russia over syria? pm cameron: there are opportunities for sensible discussions with russia about the agenda in syria, which is about a political transition so there can be a government who represent all the people of syria. i had that conversation with president putin last week.
my hon. friend mentions the downed russian jet. the facts of this are not yet clear. i think we should respect turkey's right to protect its airspace, just as we defend our own, but it is very important that we get to the bottom of exactly what happened. cunningham: the prime minister very often tells us that the first duty of any government is to protect the public. will he give an undertaking to restore the cuts to the police and the emergency services to ensure that the public in this country are protected? pm cameron: this government have a good record of protecting the public, not least because we protected counter-terrorism policing and we had a funding situation with the police that enabled them to help with the cut in crime of 31% since i became prime minister. berry: jon morton, a
drink-driver, destroyed the lives of amy baxter and hayley jones, with miss baxter being so severely injured that she is paralysed from the neck down and still in hospital 16 months later. he was sentenced to just a three-year driving ban, a fine and a 20-week tag. weeks later, he successfully applied to bolton magistrates court for his tag to be removed so that he could go on holiday to a stag party. will my right hon. friend look to issue guidance to magistrates that a tag, when part of a sentence, should never be removed to allow criminals to go on holiday? pm cameron: my hon. friend makes a very powerful point, and i will look at this very carefully. let me first express my sympathy to the victim and her family in what is undoubtedly an incredibly distressing case. it is always very difficult to comment on individual cases, because i was not sitting in the courthouse and i did not hear all the points that were made, but the point he makes does seem to be very powerful. a punishment is a punishment, a tag is a tag, and i think he is making a strong case.
malcolm mcdonald: today's middle east is increasingly resembling the central europe of a century ago. minorities, be they linguistic, religious or sexual, find themselves under more pressure than ever. my constituents, the scottish national party and i understand the threat posed to these groups by daesh, but how is the prime minister planning to prosecute a bombing campaign that does not alter the demographic map of the middle east, preventing aleppo from becoming the new lublin or mosul the new budapest? pm cameron: we will set out the arguments clearly tomorrow, but there is a clear and present danger to the united kingdom from isil, based in iraq and syria, planning attacks against our country today. we do not live in a perfect world and we cannot deliver a perfect strategy, but we can deliver a clear, long-term strategy that will work. the hon. gentleman talks about the lessons we learned from the last century.
one of the lessons i would say we should learn from the last century is that when your country is under threat, and when you face aggression against your country, you cannot endlessly sit around and dream about a perfect worldyou need to act in the world we are in. nusrat ghani: will my right hon. friend join me in congratulating all the staff at the crowborough birthing unit, including the midwives and the matron emma chambers, and local activist richard hallett on scoring 100% on their friends and family survey on satisfaction and care? the commitment of the midwives is matched only by the conservatives' commitment to the nhs, given the fact that for two elections in a row we have promised and delivered greater investment than labour in our national health service. pm cameron: my hon. friend is
absolutely right to highlight the friends and family test. it is a simple way of measuring whether our hospitals are giving great care, and i think it has been a real advance in our nhs to have that. as well as a good scheme to make sure that you want your friends and family to be treated in a hospital, we need to provide the resources for that hospital, and that is exactly what we are doing with the spending figures announced today. crucially on childbirth, it is not often that i stand here and cite the daily mirror, but it is worth looking at what it is saying about the importance of a seven-day nhs and making sure that we have high standards across our nhs every day of the week. as well as the extra money this government are putting into the nhs, the seven-day nhs will also mean a much stronger nhs. ahmed-sheikh: the big lottery fund supports important local projects in my constituency, including the gate in clackmannanshire, a small children's playground in auchterarder, and perthshire women's aidprojects that play an essential role in their communities, supporting the vulnerable people this government have left behind.
will the prime minister join me in congratulating those local projects on their work and reassure the house that this government will protect the current level of national lottery funding earmarked for charities and community projects? pm cameron: i can certainly tell the hon. lady that we will protect the big lottery fund. it does an absolutely excellent job, but i am afraid i cannot resist making the point that one of the things that the united kingdom brings is a bigger national lotterya bigger potthat can support scottish charities. following what has happened to the oil price, if there were a scottish november autumn statement, it would be about cuts, cuts, cuts and taxes, taxes, taxes, with no relief from the national lottery.