baghdadi raid help with this? mr. kirby: i don't know. reporter: who are the children who were in the building? mr. kirby: i want to be careful, we don't have perfect no, ma'am of every single individual that was killed in this raid. we know abdullah was killed and his lieutenant was on the second floor was killed. we know when the he blew himself up on the third floor three others went with him. and we know of at least one child that was killed on the second floor. but i don't have much more information to give you than that. reporter: are there civilians in u.s. custly di now? where did the saved ones go? mr. kirby: there's nobody in u.s. custky as a result of the raid. reporter: what was the

mechanical issue with the helicopter? mr. kirby: i would devibe -- >> you can see the rest of this on c-span.org or use the c-span now video app. in keeping our more than 40-year commitment to live gavel-to-gavel coverage of congress we take you to the u.s. capitol where the u.s. house of representatives is working on legislation to increase u.s. semiconductor production. live coverage on c-span. the speaker pro tempore: the chair understands that amendment number 179 will not be offered. it is now in order to consider amendment number 184 printed in part d of house report 117-241. for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. perry: madam speaker, amendment at the desk. the speaker pro tempore: the clerk will designate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 184 printed in part d of house report 117-241 offered by mr. perry of pennsylvania.

the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to house resolution 900, the gentleman from pennsylvania, mr. perry, and a member opposed, each will control five minutes. the chair recognizes the gentleman from pennsylvania. mr. perry: thank you, madam speaker. i ask my colleagues to please join me by terminating u.s. participation in the united nations framework convention on climate change. the unfccc works to stabilize greenhouse gascon sen tragss in the atmosphere in the level that will prevent dangerous human interference with the climate system. the institution's mission to prevent dangerous human interference with the climate system precludes the body from preventing natural causes and binds states -- even in the face of scientific uncertainty. together, these provisions will require treaty signers to take significant actions to curb their economic output with

considering the scientific basis for such actions or the effect such actions will have on the environment or without considering those. the paris accords present a prime example of the inefficacy of the unfccc, given the deep restrictions imposed on our nation relative the world's major polluters. namely, china. even if our g.h.g. emissions could be eliminated overnight it would have no impact globally. none. china would make up the difference. our economy will be unnecessarily crippled while the c.c.p.'s economy will grow. it further requires that industrialize nations support climate change action in developing countries on top of aid already provided to these countries. developing countries like china. like, if anybody here thinks they're still developing, i guess that's why you've been

sending our jobs over there for 40 years. but we're forced to bail them out. this amounts to the taxpayer paying for and bailing out chinese green industries at the expense of u.s. jobs. we are tired of it. put plainly, remaining party to a treaty requiring our nation to fund the offshoring and manufacturing jobs, our very own jobs should be met with contempt across this political spectrum. finally, the unfccc has made clear it does not deal with policy. it is to reshape the world's economy to eliminate free and competitive markets. former executive secretary christina stated as much. this is what she said. this is the first time in history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally within a defined period of time to change the economic development model that has been reigning for the last 150 years since the -- years.

this should be done under the constitutional system in this body, not by the dictates of the international community. with that, i urge passage of the amendment, and i reserve the balance. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves. for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? mr. castro: i stand today to oppose mr. perry's amendment which will undermine the u.s. leadership on climate change. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. castro: and isolate the united states on the world stage on a critical issue for the future of our nation and the future of the world. unfortunately, my republican colleagues claim they're deeply alarmed by china. they implore us to counter a threat from the people's republic of china. yet, when a comprehensive bill is in front of them to strengthen the united states' competitiveness on the world stage, including on our diplomacy, all of that urgency goes out the window. and why?

why aren't republicans clamoring to vote for america competes? this amendment makes clear that it's at least in part because of their climate denialism. republicans just don't want to address climate in this china bill. even though china's the biggest emitter of greenhouse gases and is outcompeting us at the same time in creating the green energy jobs of the future. the truth is they don't want the united states to address climate change, period. our closest allies were aghast when president trump pulled us out of the paris climate agreement and china took advantage of that in every way that it could. painting the united states as the irresponsible party on the world stage. now, mr. perry's amendment would have us make the same mistake again. if we want to hold china accountable for its coal power plants and its rising emissions, we need to be at the table to

pressure it to do better. and we need to lead multi-lateral efforts to combat climate change and invest in green energy and green projects because if we don't, china will be more than happy to fill in with its unsustainable belt and road initiative projects and its financing, which always comes with strings attached. for those reasons and others, i oppose this amendment and ask my colleagues to do the same. i reserve, madam speaker. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves. pursuant to -- the gentleman from pennsylvania is recognized. mr. perry: i yield the balance of my time to the gentleman from texas, chairman mccaul. the speaker pro tempore: the chairman is recognized. mr. mccaul: we will instruct the committee on science to consider my amendment to ensure this bill will not fund the chinese communist party. i ask unanimous consent to include the text of my amendment in the record immediately prior to the vote on the motion to recommit. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. mr. mccaul: the generational threat of the chinese communist party is a test, not only for

our national security but for american values. sadly, this bill fails that test. the c.c.p. exploits our economy. they're building hypersonic weapons on the backbone of u.s. technology and they're using american comblektual -- intellectual property to further their genocide. this isn't just a security issue, it's a moral issue. yet, this bill takes no meaningful steps to keep u.s. technology out of the hands of the c.c.p.'s military. even worse, my democrat colleagues have refused safeguards that would stop this money from financing slave labor and genocide in the shin jeong province. so therefore i urge my colleagues to reconsider this trojan horse bill and to support my amendment. it would stop u.s. dollars from going to the government, by -- madam speaker, this is a test of our time.

we must not help the c.c.p. build the future of global energy on the foundation of slave labor and genocide. so, therefore, i urge my colleagues on both sides to stand on the right side of history and to support my motion to recommit. with that i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from pennsylvania reserves. the gentleman from texas is recognized. mr. castro: regarding mr. perry's amendment, if the united states is not choose to lead on the issue of climate change, we can't outcompete china or expect the world to join us in countering china's policies. to compete, we must lead the world forward and we must face reality and be willing to enact policies that deal with reality. this amendment is about taking america backward, and so i ask my colleagues to oppose it. with that i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back. the gentleman from pennsylvania is recognized. mr. perry: i'd just say to my friends on the other side of the aisle, stop obfuscating.

stop sending our jobs overseas. start realizing what we have done together in this chamber to our citizens that want to work in their jobs and their country. this has done nothing but overseas our jobs, outsource our jobs. let's not continue that process. with that i yield the balance. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields. pursuant to house resolution 900, the previous question is ordered on the amendment offered by the gentleman from pennsylvania. the question is on the amendment. those in favor say aye. those opposed say no. in the opinion of the chair, the noes have it. mr. perry: madam speaker, i ask for a recorded vote. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to section 3 of house resolution 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, further proceedings are postponed.

pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendments en bloc 1 printed in part d of house report 117-241 offered by the gentlewoman from texas, ms. johnson. the clerk will redesignate the amendments en bloc. the clerk: amendments numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 24, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 49, 50, 58, 61,

63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 7677, 86, 89, 98, 102, 103, 104, 105, 108, 109, 112, 113, 115, 122, 123, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 132, 133, 134, 136, 138, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 15 -- 152, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 163,

166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 172, 173, 175, 176, 177, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 1965, 195, 196, 200 hshgs 205, 206, 210, 213, 214, 215, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 225, 226, 227, 233, 234, 236, 241, 245, 246, 247, 250, 252, 253, 254, 257, and 259 printed in part d of house

report 117-241 offered by ms. johnson of texas. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendments en bloc offered by the gentlewoman from texas. members will record their vote by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.]

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. baird of indiana, i inform the house that mr. baird will vote nay on amendments en bloc number 1.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. hudson from

the great state of north carolina, i inform the house that mr. hudson will vote no on the amendments en bloc number 1. madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. william timmons from the state below the great state of north carolina, i inform the house that mr. timmons will vote nay on the amendments en bloc. and madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. kelly armstrong of the state that has the most snow angels in record history ever made of north dakota, i inform the house that mr. kelly armstrong will vote nay on the amendments en bloc.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. louie gohmert of the great state of texas, i inform the house that mr. gohmert will vote nay on amendments en bloc1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from oklahoma seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. lucas of oklahoma, i inform the house that mr. lucas will vote no on amendments en bloc 1.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member

designated by mr. loudermilk of georgia, i inform the house that mr. loudermilk will vote nay on amendments en bloc number 1. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from california seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by ms. kim of california, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house

that ms. kim will vote no on en bloc amendment number 1.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from ohio seek recognition? ms. kaptur: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. bobby rush of illinois and mr. tim ryan of ohio, i inform the house that that these members will vote yes -- that

these members will vote yes on the amendments en bloc 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from hawaii seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. kahele, i inform the house that mr. kahele will vote yes on the pending amendments en bloc number 1.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from west virginia seek

recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. reed of new york, i inform the house that mr. reed of new york will vote no on the en bloc number 1.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. lamalfa of california, i inform the house that mr. lamalfa will vote nay on amendments en bloc number 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from washington seek recognition? >> thank you, madam speaker. as the member designated by mr. kinzinger of illinois, i inform the house that mr. kinzinger will vote no on

amendments en bloc number 1.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. crist of florida, i inform the house that mr. crist will vote yea on the amendments en bloc number 1. madam speaker, as the member designated by mrs. maloney of new york, i inform the house that mrs. maloney will also vote yea on the amendments en bloc 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. nadler, mrs. kirkpatrick, mrs. bonnie watson coleman, mr. sires, mr. payne, mr. malinowski and mr. tonko, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the

amendments en bloc number 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. stauber of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. stauber will vote nay on amendments en bloc number 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bishop of north carolina, i inform the house that mr. bishop will vote no on the amendments en bloc number 1.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> madam speaker, the following members will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 1. adams, north carolina, davids, kansas, hoyer, maryland.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. khanna, mr. cardenas, i inform the house that these members will vote aye on amendments en bloc 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition?

mr. evans: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson of florida, as the member designated by mr. doyle of pennsylvania, as the member designated by -- mr. horsford, madam speaker, as the member designated by ms. dean of pennsylvania, they will vote yes on h.r. 4521. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition?

mr. correa: madam speaker, as the member designated by the following members, henry cuellar, grace napolitano, raul ruiz, ms. roybal-allard, ms. jacobs, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on amendments en bloc 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by by chairwoman velazquez, congressman espaillat and ritchie torres of new york, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 1. the speaker pro tempore: for

what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mrs. walorski, i inform the house that mrs. walorski will vote no on amendments en bloc number 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bowman of new york, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 1.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: as the member designated by ms. wilson of florida, mr. keating of massachusetts, i inform the house that both of these members will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 1. i will join them in that vote.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new hampshire seek recognition? mr. kustoff: as the member designated by representatives axne, brownley, frankel, meng and ping agree -- ping re, they will vote knee on amendments en bloc number 1.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. wagner of missouri, will vote ney. mr. waltz will vote no on amendments en bloc number 1. as the member designated by mr. steube, i inform the house that mr. steube will vote no on amendments en bloc number one. as the member designated by mr. mchenry, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote no on amendments en bloc number 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from alabama seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. hagedorn of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. hagedorn will be voting no on amendments en bloc number 1.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. deutch of florida and mr. schneider of illinois, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 1.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. grijalva of arizona and mr. davis, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on amendments en bloc 1.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. raskin: as the member designated by representative doggett of texas, mr. cleaver of missouri, ms. moore of wisconsin, mr. welch of vermont and mr. beyer of virginia, i rise to inform the house that they will be voting yes on amendments en bloc number 16.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by members allred, porter and sheehan, these members will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by for ms. clarke of new york, mr. jeffries of new york and ms, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that they will all vote yes.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. raskin: as the member designated by mr. swawzy of new york, i inform the house that mr. swawzy will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 1.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 221, the nays are 211. the amendments en bloc are adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendments en bloc number 2 printed in part b of house report 117-241 offered by the gentlewoman from oregon, ms. the clerk will redesignate the amendments en bloc. the clerk: en bloc number 2 consisting of amendments numbered 8, 15, 18, 25, 44, 47, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 57, the 5,

60, 62, 76, 78, 81, 82, 83, 88, 95, 100, 101, 107, 111, 114, 117, 118, 119, 120, 135, 137, 162, 174, 178, 187, 197, 202, 203, 204, 206, 211, 212, 229, 230, 235, 237, 238, 249, 255, 256 and 258 printed in part b of house report 117-241 offered by ms. bonamici of oregon. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendments en bloc offered by the gentlewoman from oregon. members will record their votes by electronic device.

[captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from oklahoma seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. lucas of oklahoma, i inform the house that mr. lucas will vote no on amendments en bloc 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from alabama seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. hagedorn of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. hagedorn will be voting nay on amendment number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. stauber of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. stauber will vote nay on the amendments en bloc 2.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. loudermilk of georgia, i inform the house that mr. loudermilk will vote nay on amendments en bloc number 2. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. clarke and mr. jeffries of new york and mr. williams of georgia, i inform the house that all three members will vote yes on en bloc number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from california seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by ms. kim of california, i inform the house that ms. kim will vote yes on en

bloc amendment number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by representative grijalva, davis and sansberry, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the amendments en bloc 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bishop of north carolina, i inform the house that mr. bishop will vote no on amendments en bloc 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. deutch of florida and mr. schneider of illinois, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. lamalfa of california, i inform the house that mr. lamalfa will vote nay

on amendments en bloc number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> madam speaker, the following members vote yes on amendments en bloc number 2. hoyer of maryland, adams of north carolina, davids, kansas. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. baird of indiana, i inform the house that mr. baird will vote yea on amendments en bloc number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? ms. wexton: madam speaker, as the member designated by members allred, porter, these members will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: madam speaker, as the member designated by ms. wilson of florida, the only state in the united states with

a living corral barrier reef, i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote yes on the en bloc amendments. number two. as the member designated by mr. keating of massachusetts, the second leading producer of cranberries in the country, i inform the house that mr. keating will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. evans: madam speaker, the following members -- as the member designated by mr. lawson of florida, he votes yes on en bloc 2. madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. doyle of pennsylvania, i inform the house

that he votes yes on en bloc 2. madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. horsford of nevada, pursuant to house resolution 8, votes yes on en bloc 2. madam speaker, as the member designated by ms. dean of pennsylvania, pursuant to house resolution 8, ms. dean votes yes on en bloc 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. loui gohmert -- louie gohmert of texas, i inform the house that mr. gohmert will vote no on en bloc 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from hawaii seek recognition? mr. case: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. kahele, i inform the house that mr. kahele will vote yes on amendment en bloc 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: madam speaker, as the member designated by mrs. maloney of new york and mr. crist of florida, i inform the house that these members will vote yea on

the amendments en bloc number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. hudson of the great state of north carolina, mr. timmons of south carolina, and mr. armstrong of north dakota, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. timmons will vote yes on the amendments en bloc 2, mre nay on the amendments number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. jerry nadler, mrs. kirkpatrick, mrs. watson coleman, mr. sires, mr. payne, mr. malinowski and mr. tonko, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from ohio seek recognition?

ms. kaptur: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. rush of illinois and mr. ryan of ohio, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the amendments en bloc 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mrs. walorski of indiana, i inform the house that mrs. walorski will vote no on amendments en bloc number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. correa: madam speaker, as the member designated by the following members, henry cuellar, grace napolitano, raul ruiz, ms. roybal-allard, and mse house that these members will vote yes on amendments en bloc 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from west virginia seek recognition? mrs. miller: as the member designated by mr. reed of new york, i inform the house that mr. reed of new york will vote yes on en bloc 2.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new hampshire seek recognition? ms. kuster: as the member designated by frankel, meng and pingree, axne, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by chairwoman velazquez, congressman espaillat and congressman torres of new york, i inform the house that ms. velazquez, mr. espaillat and mr. torres of new york will vote

yes for amendments en bloc number 2.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. raskin: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. doggett of texas, mr. cleaver of missouri, mr. desaulnier of california, ms. moore of wisconsin, mr. welch of vermont, mr. beyer of virginia and mr. suozzi of new york, i inform the house that all of these members will be voting aye on the amendments en bloc 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? >> thank you, madam speaker. mr. campbell: as the member designated by mr. -- mrs. cammack: as the member

designated by mr. walz of the sunshine state, i inform the house that mr. walz will vote yea on amendments en bloc number 2. as the member designated by mr. steube, mrs. wagner and mr. mchenry, i inform the house that mr. steube, mrs. wagner and mr. mchenry will vote nay on amendments en bloc number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bowman of new york, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote no on the amendments en bloc number 2.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. connor and mr. cardenas, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 2.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from washington seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. kinzinger of illinois, i inform the house that mr. kinzinger will vote no on the amendments en bloc number 2.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote --

the speaker pro tempore: the yeas are 262 and the nays, 168. the amendments en bloc are adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendment en bloc 3, printed in part brn of house report 117-241 offered by the gentlewoman from california, ms. lofgren. the clerk will real descreght the amendment. the clerk: amendments number 6, 7, 13, 26, 27, 28, 2, 30, 37, 45, 79, 80, 92, 94, 96, 106, 110, 116, 121, 164, 165, 180, 181, 182, 183, 185, 188, 198,

199, 217, 244 and 261 printed in part b of house report 117-241 offered by ms. lofgren of california. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendments en bloc offered by the gentlewoman from california. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from michigan is recognized. >> as the member designated by mr. stauber of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. stauber will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> the following members vote

no, davis kansas, adams of north carolina and hoyer of maryland. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. kim of california, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. kim will vote yes on en bloc amendment number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois -- >> as the member designated by ms. clarke and mr. williams of georgia, i inform the house that all members will vote no on en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from oklahoma seek recognition? as the member designated by mr. lucas of oklahoma, i inform the house that mr. lucas will vote yes on amendment en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by the following members, cuellar,.

mrs.napolitano: , ruiz, roybal-allard, jacobs, i inform the house that these members will vote on the amendments en bloc 3, they will vote yes -- n. correction, these members will vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mrs. walorski of indiana, i inform the house that mrs. walorski will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. grijalva and mr. davis, these members will vote no on amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bishop of north carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8,

i inform the house that mr. bishop will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from -- the gentlewoman from seek recognition? mr. kustoff: representatives brownley, frankel, pingree. these members will vote no on the amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from west virginia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. reed of new york, i inform the house that mr. reed of new york will vote yes on en bloc number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from hawaii seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. kahele, i inform the house that mr. kahele will vote no on

amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from alabama seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. hagedorn, i inform the house that mr. hagedorn will be voting yes on amendment number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by by members allred, porter and trahan, these members will vote no on amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from washington seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. kin dinger, i inform the house that mr. kinzinger will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 3. mr. evans: as the member designated by mr. lawson of florida, mr. doyle of pennsylvania, mr. who areford of nevada and ms. dean of

pennsylvania, will vote no on en bloc 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> smeagd mr. baird of indiana, i inform the house that mr. baird will vote on amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. loudermilk of georgia, i inform the house that mr. loudermilk will vote yea on amendments en bloc number 3. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. maloney of new york and mr. crist of florida, i inform the house that mrs. maloney and mr. crist will vote nay on the amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member

designated by mr. lamalfa of california, i inform the house that mr. lamalfa will vote yea on amendments enblom number 3 -- en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from ohio -- the gentlewoman from ohio seek recognition? ms. kaptur: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. ryan of ohio and mr. rush of illinois, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the amendments en bloc 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. raskin: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. cleaver of missouri, mr. doggett of texas, mr. desaulnier of california, ms. moore of wisconsin, mr. welch of vermont, mr. beyer of virginia, mr. swazer of new york, -- mr. suozzi of new york, i inform

the house that these members vote no on the en bloc amendment number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. wilson of florida, home to 11 national parks, i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote no on the amendments en bloc number 3. as the member designated by mr. keating of massachusetts, home of fenway park, the oldest national baseball stadium in use, which opened in 1912, mr. keating will vote no on en bloc amendment number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? ms. ocasio-cortez: as the member designated by mr. bowman of new york, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote no on the amendments en bloc number 3.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. khanna and mr. cardenas, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the amendments en bloc number 3.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. meeks: mr. speaker, as the member designated by chairwoman velazquez, congressman espaillat and torres of new york, i inform the house that ms. velazquez, mr. espaillat and mr. torres of new york will vote no on amendments en bloc number 3.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? mrs. cammack: thank you, mr.

speaker. as the member designated by mr. walz, steube, mrs. wagner and mr. mchenry, i inform the house that mr. walz, steube, mrs. wagner and mr. mchenry will vote yea on amendments en bloc number 3.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. nadler, mrs. kirkpatrick, ms. wattson coleman, mr. sires -- mrs. watson coleman, mr. sires, mr. payne, mr. malinowski and mr. tonko, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? ms. ocasio-cortez: mr. speaker, as the member designated by -- >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. deutch of florida and mr. schneider of illinois, i inform the house

that these members will vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. hudson of north carolina, mr. timmons of south carolina, mr. armstrong of north dakota, i inform the house that mr. hudson, mr. timmons and mr. armstrong will all vote yes on the en bloc amendments number 3.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 201, the nays are 2 --

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 204. the nays are 225. the amendments en bloc are not adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendment 22 printed in part d of house report 117-241 offered by the gentlewoman from washington, ms. jayapal. the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 22 printed in part d of house report 117-241 offered by ms. jayapal of washington. the speaker pro tempore: the

question is on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from washington. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bishop of north carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. bishop will vote no on the jayapal amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from washington seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. kinzinger of illinois, i inform the house that mr. kinzinger will vote no on amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from oklahoma seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. lucas from oklahoma, i inform the house that mr. lucas will vote no on amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for

what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. deutch of florida, mr. schneider of illinois, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. baird of indiana, i inform the house that mr. baird will vote no on amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. correa: mr. speaker, as the member designated by the following members -- henry quayia yar -- cuellar of texas, grace napolitano of california, raul ruiz of california, ms. roybal-allard of california, and ms. sara jacobs of california, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the amendment number 22.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition, justice mr. speaker -- recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. hudson, mr. timmons, mr. armstrong, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that they will all vote no on amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. brown: mr. speaker, i inform the house that ms. adams of north carolina will vote yes on amendment number 22. and mr. hoyer of maryland will also vote yes. i inform the house that ms. davids of kansas will vote no on the amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from california seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. kim of california, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. kim will vote no on

amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? for what purpose does the gentlewoman from west virginia seek recognition? for what purpose does the gentlewoman from west virginia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. reed of new york, i inform the house that mr. reed of new york will vote no on amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. grijalva, ms. stance burry, and -- ms. stansbury, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. loudermilk of georgia, i inform the house that mr. loudermilk will vote nay on amendment number 22. thank you.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: pallone mr. speaker -- mr. pallone: mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. nadler, mrs. kirkpatrick, mrs. bonnie watson coleman, mr. sires, mr. donald payne, and mr. paul tonko, i inform the house that these members will vote no on -- sorry -- these members will vote yes on the bowman amendment. but as the member designated by mr. tom malinowski, i inform the house that mr. malinowski will vote no on the bowman amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from alabama seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. hagedorn from the great state of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. hagedorn will be voting no on amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: mr. speaker, as

the member designated by mr. keating of massachusetts and ms. wilson of florida, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on bowman amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. stauber of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. stauber will vote nay on amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. clark and mr. jeff -- ms. clarke and mr. jeffries of new york and ms. williams of georgia, i inform the house that all three will vote yes on the bowman amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. walorski of indiana, i inform the house that mrs. walorski will vote no on amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from hawaii seek recognition?

mr. case: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. kahele, i inform the house that mr. kahele will vote yes on bowman number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by chairwoman nydia velazquez, congressman espaillat, and congressman torres of new york, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. velazquez, mr. espaillat and mr. torres of new york will vote yes on jayapal-bowman amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? >> thank you -- mrs. cammack: thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. steube, ms. waltz, mrs. wagner, i inform the house that mr. waltz, mr. steube, mrs. wagner will vote nay on amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by members porter, allred, trahan,

i inform the house that these members will vote yes on bowman amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. raskin: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. doggett of texas, mr. cleaver of missouri, mr. desaulnier of california, ms. moore of wisconsin, mr. welch of vermont, mr. beyer of virginia, mr. suozzi of new york, i rise to inform the house that these members will be voting aye on the jayapal amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. lamalfa from california, i inform the house that mr. lamalfa will vote nay on amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. evans: mr. speaker, as the member designated by these

following individuals will vote yes, mr. lawson of florida, privileged resolution, mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. doyle of pennsylvania, mr. speaker, mr. harper of nevada, and mr. speaker, ms. meng, they vote yes on part -- bowman number 22. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new hampshire seek recognition? ms. kuster: thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mrs. axne, i inform the house that mrs. axne will vote no on bowman amendment number 22. and as the member designated by

ms. brownley, ms. frankel, ms. meng, and ms. pingree, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on bowman amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. khanna and mr. cardenas, i inform the house that these members will vote aye on bowman amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from ohio seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member

designated by mr. rush of illinois, mr. rush of ohio, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on bowman amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bowman, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote yes on bowman amendment number 22.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from ohio seek

recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. ryan of ohio and mr. rush of illinois, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on bowman amendment number 22.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. maloney of new york, i inform the house that mrs. maloney will vote yea on the jayapal amendment. and, mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. crist of florida, i inform the house that mr. crist will vote nay on the jayapal amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 181, the nays are 248. the amendment is not adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendment 43 printed in part b of house report 117-241 offered by the gentleman from texas, mr. castro. the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 43 printed in part d of house report 117-241 offered by mr. castro of texas. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from texas. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. hudson of north carolina, mr. timmons of south carolina, mr. armstrong of north dakota, pursuant to house

resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. hudson, mr. timmons and mr. armstrong will all vote no on amendment number 43. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from west virginia seek recognition? mrs. miller: as the member designated by mr. reed of new york, i inform the house that mr. reed of new york will vote no on amendment 43 offered by mr. castro. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. deutch of florida, mr. schneider of illinois, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the castro amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from washington seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. kinzinger from illinois, i inform the house that mr. kinzinger will vote no on amendment 43. the speaker pro tempore: for

what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? ms. wexton: mr. speaker, as the member designated by members allred, porter and trahan, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the castro amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from california seek recognition? mrs. steel: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. kim of california, i inform the house that ms. kim will vote no on astro number 43. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. clarke and mr. jeffries of new york and ms. williams of georgia, i inform the house that all three members will vote yes on it's as crow teamed -- on the castro amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bishop of north carolina, i inform the house that mr. bishop will vote no on it's as crow -- castro amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. khanna and mr. cardenas, i inform the house that these members will vote aye on the

castro amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from alabama seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. hagedorn of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. hagedorn will be voting no on amendment number 43. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, the following members vote yes on the castro amendment. adams, north carolina. hoyer, maryland. davids, kansas. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. loudermilk of georgia, i inform the house that mr. loudermilk will vote nay on amendment number 43. and, mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. long of missouri, i inform the house that mr. long will vote nay on amendment number 43. thank you.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. raskin: as the member designated by representatives doggett, cleaver, desaulnier, moore, welch, buyer and suozzi, i inform the house that these members will be voting aye on amendment number 43. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. stauber of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. stauber will vote nay on amendment number 43. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. evans: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson, the following members -- of florida. as the member designated by mr. doyle of pennsylvania. as the member designated by mr. horsford of nevada. as the member designated by from pennsylvania, ms. dean, all of them vote yes.

the speaker pro tempore: does the gentleman from new york -- for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. lamalfa of california, i inform the house that mr. lamalfa will vote nay on amendment number 43. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new hampshire seek recognition? ms. kuster: as the member designated by representatives axne, brownley, frankel, meng and pingree, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the castro amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from ohio seek recognition? ms. kaptur: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. rush of illinois and mr. ryan of ohio, i inform the house that these

members will vote yes on the castro amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. baird of indiana, i inform the house that mr. baird will vote nay on amendment number 43. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. correa: mr. speaker, as the member designated by the following members, henry cuellar of texas, grace napolitano of california, raul ruiz of california, ms. roybal-allard of california, and ms. sara jacobs of california, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the castro amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. sires,

mr. nadler, mrs. kirkpatrick, mrs. watson coleman, mr. payne, mr. malinowski, mr. tonko, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the castro amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. keating of the comob wealth of massachusetts -- commonwealth of massachusetts, and ms. wilson of the state of florida, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the castro amendment. i will do the same. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. walorski of indiana, i inform the house that mrs. walorski will vote no on amendment number 43.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? ms. ocasio-cortez: as the member designated by mr. bowman of new york, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote yes on the castro amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. meeks: mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. velazquez, mr. espaillat and mr. torres, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the castro amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? mrs. cammack: thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. waltz, steube, mchenry, and buchanan, and mrs. wagner, i inform the house that mr. waltz, steube, mchenry, buchanan, and mrs. wagner will vote nay on amendment number 43. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. louie gohmert from the great state of texas, i inform the house that mr. gohmert will vote no on amendment number 43.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from oklahoma seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. lucas of oklahoma, i inform the house that mr. lucas will vote no on amendment number 43.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from hawaii seek recognition? mr. case: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. kahele, i inform the house that mr. kahele will vote yes on the castro amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. maloney of

new york and mr. crist of florida, i inform the house that mrs. maloney and mr. crist will vote yea on the castro amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 216. the nays are 214. the amendment is adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendment 56 printed in part d of house report 117-241 offered by the gentleman from texas, mr. crenshaw. the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 56 printed in part d of house report 117-241 offered by mr. crenshaw of texas. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from texas. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or

commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. jerry nadler, mrs. ann kirkpatrick, mrs. bonnie watson coleman, mr. albio sires, mr. donald payne, and mr. paul tonko, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the crenshaw amendment. and as the member designated by mr. tom malinowski, i inform the house that mr. malinowski will vote yes on the crenshaw amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from west virginia seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. reed of new york, i inform the house that mr. reed of new york will vote yes on amendment number 56. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition?

mr. garcia: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. grijalva, ms. stansbury and mr. davis, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the crenshaw amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from alabama seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. hagedorn of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. hagedorn will be voting yea on amendment number 56. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. wilson of california, mr. keating of massachusetts, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the crenshaw amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from california seek recognition? mrs. steel: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. kim of california, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. kim will vote yes on the crenshaw amendment 40 -- no, actually 56. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member

designated by mr. welch, i inform the house that mr. welch will vote aye on the crenshaw amendment. as the member designated by mr. cleaver, mr. doggett, mr. beyer, mr. suozzi, ms. moore, mr. desaulnier, i rise to inform the house these members will vote no on the crenshaw amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. louie gohmert from the great state of texas, i inform the house that mr. gohmert will vote yes on amendment 56. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. cardenas and mr. khanna, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the crenshaw amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? mr. fleischmann: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. loudermilk of georgia, i inform the house that mr. loudermilk will vote yea on amendment number 56. and mr. speaker, as the member

designated by mr. long of missouri, i inform the house that mr. long will vote yea on amendment number 56. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. evans: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, mr. lawson votes yes on the crenshaw amendment. as the member designated by mr. horford of nevada, mr. horford votes yes on the amendment. and mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. dean, ms. dean votes no. as the member designated by mr. doyle, mr. doyle votes no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. walorski of

indiana, i inform the house that mrs. walorski will vote yes on amendment 56. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. brown: mr. speaker, ms. davids votes yes on the crenshaw amendment. and mr. hoyer of maryland votes no on the crenshaw amendment. ms. adams votes no on the crenshaw amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from hawaii seek recognition? mr. case: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. kahele, i inform the house that mr. kahele will vote yes on the crenshaw amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition -- the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by members moulton and porter, i inform the house that those members will vote yes on the crenshaw amendment. as the member designated by mr. allred and mrs. trahan, i inform the house that those members will vote no on the crenshaw amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. hudson from the great state of north carolina, mr. timmons from south carolina, which is pretty good, mr. armstrong of north dakota, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. hudson, timmons, and armstrong will vote yes on amendment 56. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition -- the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. clarke, mr. jeffries, they'll vote no on the crenshaw amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. baird of indiana, i inform the house that mr. baird will vote yes on amendment number 56. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bowman, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote no on the crenshaw amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from washington state seek recognition >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. kinzinger of illinois, i inform the house that mr. kinzinger will vote yes on amendment 56. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by chairwoman nydia velazquez, congressman adry yao noah pace eat and congressman richie torres of new york, i inform the house that ms. velazquez, mr. cores reand mr. espaillat vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman rise. >> as the member designated by mr. stobber of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. stobber will vote yea on amendment number 56.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by the following members, henry cuellar, grace napolitano, raul ruiz and sara jacobs, i inform the house that these members will vote no on

the crenshaw amendment. mr. speaker, as the member designated by congress member roybal-allard, i inform the house that ms. roybal-allard will vote yes on the crenshaw amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from haye seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. kehele, i inform the house that mr. kehele will vote no on the crenshaw amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from ohio seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. rush of illinois and mr. ryan of ohio, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the crenshaw amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bishop of north carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. bishop will vote yes on the crenshaw amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from oklahoma seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. lucas of oklahoma, i inform the house that mr. lucas will vote yea on amendment number 56. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. schneider of illinois and mr. deutch of florida, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the crenshaw amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. maloney, i inform the house that mrs. maloney will vote nay on the crenshaw amendment.

and as the member designated by mr. crist of florida, i inform the house that mr. crist will vote yea on the crenshaw amendment. maloney of new york.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new hampshire seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by representative axne, i inform the house that representative axne will vote yes on the crenshaw amendment. and as the member designated by representative brownley, frankel, meng, and pingree, pursuant to house resolution 965, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the crenshaw amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by designated by mr. waltz, steube, mchenry and buchanan and mrs.

wagner, i inform the house that these members will vote yea on amendment number 56.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote, the yeas are 264, the nays are 163-rbg the amendment is adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendment 89 printed in part d of house report 117-241, offered by the gentleman from california, mr. garamendi. the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 89 prinked in part d of house repoz 117-241, offered by mr. garamendi of california. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from california.

members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new hampshire seek recognition? >> as the member designated by representative axne, brownley, frankel, meng and pingree, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the garamendi amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the >> as the member designated by mr. hudson of north carolina, mr. timmons of south carolina and mr. armstrong of north dakota, i inform the house that mr. will vote know. >> the following members vote yes on the gar meppedy, davis of kansas, hoyer of maryland. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the

gentlewoman from west virginia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. reed of new york, i inform the house that mr. reed of new york will vote yes on amendment 89. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by allred, porter, trap han, these members will vote yes on the gar meppedy amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. loudermilk of georgia, i inform the house that mr. loudermilk will vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. deutch of florida and mr. deutch, they will vote yes on the gar meppedy amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from california psyche recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. kim of california, pursuant

to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. kim will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? >> i inform the house that all three members will vote yes on the garamendi-johnson amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> as the member designated by louie gohmert, i inform the house that he will vote yes on amendment 89. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from ohio seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. rush of illinois and mr. ryan these members will vote yes on the gar meppedy amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlemanfrom seek recognition?

>> pursuant. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from hawaii seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. kahele. >> for what purpose does the gentleman from oklahoma seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. lucas, mr. lucas will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by by the following members, cull air,. mrs.napolitano: , ruiz, riebl jacobs, i inform the house that they will vote knee yes. >> as the member designated by mr. hagedorn of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. hagedorn will be voting yes on amendment number 89. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by

mr. bowman, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote yes on the garamendi amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> earl mr. stauber will vote yes on amendment number 89. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. raskin: i rise to inform they will vote yes on the garamendi amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana recognition? >> i inform the house that mr. baird will vote yes amendment number 89. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. evans: the following members vote yes, as the member designated by mr. lawson of florida, as the member designated by mr. doyle of pennsylvania, mr. horsford of

nevada and ms. dean of pennsylvania, they vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. davis, ms. stance bury and mr. grijalva, i inform the house

the house they will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from state of washington seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. kinzinger of illinois, i inform the house that mr. kinzinger will vote yes on amendment number 89. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: negd mr. jerry nadler and mrs. kirkpatrick and mr. sires and payne and mr. paul tonko, these members will vote yes on the gar meppedy amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. cardenas, he will vote aye on the garamendi amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. meeks: as the member designated by congressman espaillat, pursuant to house resolution 8 that mr. torres and ms. velazquez will vote yes on the gar meppedy amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. waltz, mr. steube and mr. mchenry, i inform the house they will vote nay on amendment number 89. i inform the house that mrs. wagner and mr. buchanan will vote yes on amendment number 89.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. lamalfa, i inform the house that mr. lamalfa will vote yes on amendment number 89.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bishop of north carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, mr. bishop will vote yes to the garamendi amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from seek recognition? >> i inform the house that mrs. maloney will vote yes. as the member designated by mr. crist of florida, i inform the house that mr. crist will

vote yes on the gar meppedy amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: as the member designated by mr. keating of massachusetts whose state bird is the black cat chicagoo de, i inform the house that he will vote yes. as member disegd ms. wilson of florida, the the state with the most golf coursers in america, ms. wilson will vote yes on the gar meppedy amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote, the yeas are 367. and the nays are 59. the amendment is adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendment 124 printed in part d of house report 117-241, offered by the gentlewoman from washington, miss jayapal. -- ms. eye pal. the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 124,

printed in part d of house report 117-241, offered by ms. jayapal of washington. the speaker pro tempore: the amendment offered by the -- the question is on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from washington. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. kim of california, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. kim will vote no on jayapal amendment 124. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from oklahoma seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. lucas of oklahoma, i inform the house that mr. lucas will vote no on amendment number 124. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman

from illinois seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. davis of illinois, ms. strainsberry of new mexico, and mr. grijalva of new mexico, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the jayapal amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. lamalfa of california, i inform the house that mr. lamalfa will vote nay on amendment 124. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. clark and mr. jeffries of new york and ms. williams of georgia, i inform the house that all three members will vote yes on the jayapal amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from alabama seek recognition? texas seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. gohmert of the great state of texas, i inform the house that louie gohmert will vote no on number 124. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. schneider of

illinois and mr. deutch of florida, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the jayapal amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from alabama seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. hagedorn of the great state of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. hagedorn will be voting no on amendment 124. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. loudermilk of georgia, i inform the house that mr. loudermilk will vote nay on amendment 124. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. waltz, steube, mchenry, buchanan and mrs. wagner, i

inform the house that mr. waltz, steube, mchenry and mrs. wagner will vote nay on amendment 124. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. wilson of florida, home to three of the 10 largest public universities in the clint by enrollment, i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote yes on the jayapal amendment. as the member designated by mr. keating of massachusetts, where basketball was born in 1891 in springfield, i inform the house that mr. keating will vote yes on the jayapal amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. stauber of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. stauber will vote no on amendment 124. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek

recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: as the member designated by mrs. carolyn maloney of new york, i inform the house that mrs. maloney will vote yea on the jayapal amendment. as the member designated by mr. crist of florida, i inform the house that mr. crist will vote nay on the jayapal amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, by the power vested in me as the member designated by mr. hudson of north carolina, mr. timmons of south carolina, mr. armstrong of north dakota, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. hudson, timmons and armstrong will vote no on the amendment 124. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, these following

members -- as the member designated by mr. lawson of florida, mr. doyle of pennsylvania, and ms. dean of pennsylvania, they all vote yes. and also mr. harper votes no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new hampshire seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member

designated by representative axne, i inform the house that representative axne will vote no on the jayapal amendment. as the member designated by representatives bran lee, frankel, meng, and pingree, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the jayapal amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mrs. walorski of indiana, i inform the house that mrs. walorski will vote no -- vote no on amendment 124. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. rush of illinois and mr. ryan of ohio, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the jayapal amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from washington seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. kinzinger, i inform the house that mr. kinzinger will vote no on amendment number 124. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. baird of indiana, i inform the house that mr. baird will vote no on amendment number 124.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from haye seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. kehele, i inform the house that mr. kehele will vote yes on the jayapal amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by representative suozzi -- representatives suozzi, beyer, welch, moore, cleaver, desaulnier and doggett, i inform the house that these members will vote aye on the

jayapal amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, mr. hoyer of maryland, ms. adams of north carolina, ms. davids of kansas all vote yes on the jayapal amendment 124.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by representatives allred, moulton, strahan, they will vote yes on the jayapal amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. suozzi of new york, i inform the house that mr. suozzi is voting no on the jayapal amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by chairwoman nydia velazquez, congressman espaillat and congressman ritchie torres of new york, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. velazquez, mr. espaillat and mr. torres of new york will vote yes on jayapal amendment number 124. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bishop of north carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. bishop will vote no on the

jayapal amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. khanna and mr. cardenas, i inform the house that these members will vote aye on the jayapal amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. moulton, i inform the house that mr. moulton will vote yes on the jayapal amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from west virginia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. reed of new york, i inform the house that mr. reed of new york will vote no on amendment 124. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bowman, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote yes on the jayapal amendment .

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. jerry nadler, kirkpatrick and sires and donald payne and mallin nows ky and these members will vote yes on the amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by by the following members, cuellar of texas, napolitano of california, ruiz of california and roybal-allard of california and jacobs of california, i inform the house these members will vote yes on the jayapal amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: the yeas are 1775 and the nays are

255. the amendment is not adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is question on amendment 131 printed in house report offered by the gentlewoman from oklahoma. the clerk: amendment number 131 printed in part b of house report 117-241 offered by mrs. buys of oklahoma. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from from oklahoma. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] house of representatives. >> as the member designated by mr. reed of new york, i inform the house that mr. reed will vote yes on amendment 131. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas seek

recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. gohmert, i inform the house that mr. gohmert will vote yes on amendment 131. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from california seek recognition? as the member designated by mrsm the house that ms. kim will vote yes on kim amendment 131. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: as the member designated by representatives nadler, kirkpatrick, and tonko, these members will vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. lamalfa of california, i inform the house that

mr. lamalfa will vote yes on amendment 131. >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. hagedorn of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. hagedorn will be voting yes on amendment 131. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. loudermilk of georgia, i inform the house the house that mr. loudermilk will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> mr. hoyer will vote no and mrs. davis of kansas votes yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> mr. timmons of south carolina and mr. armstrong pursuant to

house resolution 8 will vote yes on the amendment 131. >> as the member designated by mr. welch of vlt, mr. welch will vote yes. as the member designated by by mr. suozzi, mr. beyer, ms. moore and mr. desaulnier and mr. cleaver and mr. doggett, they will vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. stauber of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. stauber will vote yes ole amendment 131. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek

recognition? as the member designated by mr. moulton and mrs. trahan, these members will vote no on the amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from washington seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. kinzinger of illinois, i inform the house that mr. kinzinger will vote yes on amendment 131.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: as the member designated by ms. wilson of florida, i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote no and as the member designated by mr. keating, i inform the house that mr. keating will vote yes on the amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? >> i inform the house that all three members will vote no on the amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> mr. speaker as the member designated by by the following members, henry cuellar, grace napolitano, raw you'll reu eases and inform the house that they will vote no on the amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from oklahoma seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. lucas of oklahoma, i inform the house that mr. lucas will vote yes on amendment 131. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. davis of illinois, mr. grijalva of arizona, i inform the house that they will vote no on the amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman

from north carolina. >> as the member designated by mr. bishop of north carolina, i inform the house that mr. bishop will vote yes on the amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition snr. mr. evans: the following members vote no. as the the member designated by by mr. horsford of nevada and ms. dean and mr. doyle votes nay and mr. lawson votes yes. >> as the member designated by mr. waltz and mr. mchenry, buchanan, i ini inform the house the house they will vote yes and as the member designated by mr. steube, i inform the house that mr. steube will vote nay ole amendment 131.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from hawaii seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. kahele, i inform the house that mr. kahele will vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from. >> that mrs. walorski will vote yes on amendment 131. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman

from new york seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by chairwomanned any jay velazquez, congressman adrian espaillat, congressman richie torres of new york, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. velazquez, mr. espaillat and mr. torres of new york will vote no on the bias-kim amendment. -- on the bice-kim amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new hampshire seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. frankel and ms. meng, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the bice amendment. and as the member designated by mrs. axne, ms. brownley, and mse that these members will vote yes on the bice amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. khanna and mr. cardenas, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the bice amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bowman, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote no on the bice amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: as the member designated by mr. crist of florida, i inform the house that mr. crist will vote yea on the bice amendment. and mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. carolyn maloney of new york, i inform the house that mrs. maloney will vote nay on the bice amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. deutch of florida, i inform the house that mr. deutch will vote no on the bice amendment. as the member designated by

mr. schneider of illinois, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. schneider will vote yes on the bice amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. baird of indiana, i inform the house that mr. baird will vote yea on amendment 131. thank you, guys.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from ohio seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. rush of illinois, mr. ryan of ohio, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the bice amendment number -- on the bice amendment. thank you.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 279, the nays

are 153, the amendment is domented. -- is adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendment 184 printed in part d of house report 117-241 offered by the gentleman from pennsylvania, mr. the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 184, printed in part d of house report 117-241, offered by mr. perry of pennsylvania. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from pennsylvania. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman rise? >> as the member designated by mr. rice -- these members will vote yes on amendment 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman rise? >> as the member designated by mr. reed of new york, i inform the house that mr. reed will vote yes on amendment 184. the speaker pro tempore: for

what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, following members vote no on the perry amendment. hoyer, maryland. davids, kansas, adams, north carolina. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. baird from indiana, i inform the house that mr. baird will vote yea on amendment 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson of florida, mr. doyle of pennsylvania, mr. horse ford of nevada, they all vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. kim of california, i inform the house that ms. kim will vote yes on the perry amendment 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by members allred, moulton, poforter and trahan,

manufacture inform these members will vote no on the perry amendment 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. stauber of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. staub erveg r will vote yea on amendment 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. clark and mr. jeffries of new york and ms. williams of georgia, i inform the house that all thee members will will -- members will vote no on the perry amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. hudson of north carolina, timmons, south carolina, armstrong, north dakota, i inform the house that mr. hudson, timmons and armstrong will vote yes on the amendment 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. deutch of florida, mr. schneider of illinois, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the perry amendment number 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member

designated by mr. loudermilk of georgia, i inform the house that mr. loudermilk will vote yea on amendment 184. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by chairwoman nydia velazquez,ening congressman espaillat, congressman torres of new york, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. velazquez, mr. espaillat and mr. torres of new york will vote no on the perry amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from oklahoma seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. lucas of oklahoma, i inform the house that mr. lucas will vote yea on amendment number 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. wilson of florida, mr. keating of the commonwealth of massachusetts, i inform the house that both these members, along with myself, will vote no on the perry amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the

gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? mrs. cammack: thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. walz, steube, mchenry, buchanan and mrs. wagner, i inform the house that mr. walz, steube, mchenry, buchanan and mrs. wagner will vote yea on amendment 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from ohio seek recognition? ms. kaptur: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. rush of illinois and mr. ryan of ohio, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the perry amendment, number 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. lamalfa of california, i inform the house that mr. lamalfa will vote nay on amendment 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. raskin: as the member designated by representative suozzi, buyer, welch, moore, desaulnier, cleaver, i inform

the house that these members will vote no on the perry amendment, 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. bishop of north carolina, i inform the house that mr. bishop will vote yes on the perry amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. maloney of new york and mr. crist of florida, i inform the house that these members will vote nay on the perry amendment, number 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. gohmert of the great state of texas, i inform the house that mr. gohmert will vote yea on amendment 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. jerry nadler, ms. ann kirkpatrick, mrs. bonnie wattson cole -- mrs. bonnie watson coleman, mr. tonko, mr. nadler, i inform

the house that these people will vote no on the perry amendment. >> as the member designated by mr. hagedorn of minnesota, i inform the house that mr. hagedorn will be voting yes on amendment number 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new hampshire seek recognition? ms. kuster: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. axne, brownley, frankel, meng and pingree, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the perry amendment, number 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. walorski of indiana, i inform the house that mrs. walorski will vote yes on amendment 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. cardenas and mr. khanna, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the perry amendment, 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from washington seek recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker.

as the member designated by mr. kinzinger of illinois, i inform the house that mr. kinzinger will vote nay on amendment 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. correa: mr. speaker, as the member designated by the following members, henry cuellar of texas, grace napolitano of california, raul ruiz of california, ms. roybal-allard of california, and ms. sara jacobs of california, i inform the house that these members will vote no on the perry amendment, number 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new york seek recognition? ms. ocasio-cortez: as the member designated by mr. bowman, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote no on the perry amendment, number 184. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. raskin: as the member designated by mr. doggett of texas, i inform the house that mr. doggett will vote no on the perry amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from hawaii seek recognition? mr. case: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. kahele, i inform the house that mr. kahele will vote no on amendment 184.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 196, the nays are 235. the amendment is not adopted. pursuant to clause 1-c of rule 19, further consideration of h.r. 4521 is postponed. the chair will now entertain requests for one-minute speeches. for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition?

>> madam speaker, i ask unanimous consent to address the house for one minute and revise and extend my remarks. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentlewoman is recognized for one minute. >> thank you, madam speaker. i rise today to celebrate the beginning of black history month and highlight the contributions and impact of black americans in my community. when i was elected to congress in 2018, i became the first black woman to represent the 14th district and the youngest black woman in congress. ms. underwood: i am honored to hold a place in illinois 14th black history alongside the trail blazer that came before me, like batavia native charles edward hall whose career at the census bureau fundamentally changed our understanding of black communities. or civil war veteran henry beard and his wife julia, who after escaping slavery became the first black residents of sycamore in 1871.

and dr. lloyd hall from elgin who revolutionized food, drug and cosmetic preservation with the creation of a new sterilization process. these are just a few of the black illinoisans who have made a mark on my community and our country and i am very proud to honor them. thank you and i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from georgia seek recognition? >> i ask unanimous consent to address the house for one minute and revise and extend my remarks. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentleman is recognized for one minute. >> i rise today to honor the life of georgia's very own college football legend larry "bruce" yan. he was a native of georgia moving to states bro in 1989 where he graduated with a full scholarship to play for the university of georgia's football team. mr. carter: while playing for the university of georgia he was inducted into the national foundation college hall of fame, having played in the cotton bowl, liberty bowl and sugar

bowl and being a member of the all-academic s.e.c. team. after graduate, bruce went on to become the owner of the well-own and community-loved snookie's restaurant in states bro until its closing in 2012. bruce went on to manage will low pond senior center for several years before retiring. his are emaining year were spent with his wife carol and his children who i know miss him dearly. his love for his community, family and friends is something we should all work to build in ourselves. having been a prominent member in his community and church, bruce's passing is felt by the entire community. my thoughts and prayers are with his family and all who knew him during this time. thank you, madam speaker, and i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: thank you. for what purpose does the gentlewoman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> i ask unanimous consent to address the house for one minute and revise and extend my remarks. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentlewoman is recognized for one minute. the speaker pro tempore: thank you, madam speaker. i rise to discuss two amendments

to the competes act that were offered by me. the first amendment would direct relevant federal agencies to identify u.s. allied countries that are key research partners so that we can develop and implement security procedures safeguarding our research. ms. wild: when we lead with diplomacy and ensure our nation's scientist, businesses and workers compete on a level playing field, the result is innovation, opportunity, and prosperity for americans and our allies alike. i thank representatives gallagher, cheney and kasten for joining with me on this bipartisan effort. my second amendment dealt with the human rights crisis in the philippines. president due territory's so-called war on drugs has served as a pretext to conduct an estimated 30,000 extra judicious -- extrajudicial kill, unquassly restrain torture and arrest dissidents including a u.s. citizen, activist brandon

lee who rere-mains paralyzed from the chest down as a result of an assassination attempt. this amendment said u.s. funds in the bill cannot go to philippines police forces as long as biasic human rights are flagrantly violated. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady's time has expired. for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? >> thank you, madam speaker. i seek unanimous consent to address the house for one minute to revise and extend thinkmy remarks. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentleman is recognized for one minute. >> thank you. imagine if you were an inventor with a new idea, you paw lot of time, effort and money into everything it takes for your idea to become a reality. finally after all your hard work you have a successful product. however, a foreign competitor copied your intellectual property and your product is now worthless, madam speaker. this is a serious problem facing american inventor, entrepreneurs and businesses. and the chinese communist party

is typically the culprit behind intellectual property theft. we haven't done a dadgum thing to stop the exploitation. house democrats are putting on the floor a bogus chinese competition bill that does nothing to solve this problem. in fact they even rejected several amendments that addressed the lack of intellectual property protections in their bill. my trade related intellectual property act was among the amendments democrats rejected. it would require approval to share with the member states giving us a chance to make sure american's hard work doesn't get stolen by the communist chinese. by excluding my commonsense amendment, democrats missed an opportunity to make their bill a legitimate response to communist china's attacks. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. mr. burchett: and we are getting into the chinese communist wishes.

thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady seek recking in. >> i ask unanimous cob sent to address the house for one minute and revise and extend my remarks as needed. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady is recognized. >> i rise solemnly today to draw attention to an appalling national bench mark. this is gun violence survivors week. the time of year that gun deaths in america surpass the number of gun deaths that most other countries will mourn at the end of the year. ms. stevens: if at all. 2022 is barely under way and yet here we are. exceptional in the most disastrous and yet unacceptable way. already at a completely incomprehensible count of lives lost to the scourge of gun violence in this country. gun violence leaves a mark on each individual and community it impacts and it spares none of our constituents and none of our fellow countrymen and will.

this week i'm thinking of the students and parents back home in wvp, in oakland county who can no longer distinguish between a practice exercise and an active shooter scenario in our schools. the threats have been perpetual and the vinyl has become too real for far too many. so we join in this house of representatives to commit to acting on gun safety legislation for those who are not working for it are working against it. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from oklahoma seek recognition? >> madam speaker, i ask unanimous consent to address the house for one min and revise and extend my remarks. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentlewoman is recognized for one minute. >> thank you, madam speaker. i rise today to con grj late the city of shawnee for being named the number one city for women-owned businesses in oklahoma. the data collected by the -- by oklahoma baptist university is reflective of the impressive and hard working women in oklahoma's fifth district. the percentage of women-owned business in shawnee is almost

twice the statewide average for cities in oklahoma. and 29.5% higher than the national average. mrs. bice: in total, 49.4% of all shawnee forward businesses are own -- ford businesses are owned and operated by women. i'm proud to represent such dynamic women who are an integral part of oklahoma's economy through creating jobs and earn riching communities. their contributions to the financial stability, growth and innovation in the state of oklahoma is invaluable. i am grateful for the city of shawnee and shaw mi ford for their successful efforts in fostering a positive environment for women entrepreneurs to start and grow their businesses. this hub of leaders has ignited oklahoma's entrepreneurial spirit and will no doubt inspire young women and girls across our great state for generations to come. thank you, madam speaker, i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas seek recognition? >> madam speaker, i ask to

address the house and revise and extend for one minute. the speaker pro tempore: without objection the gentlewoman is recognized for one minute. ms. jackson lee: thank you. this morning at the national prayer breakfast, the outstanding speakers of president joe biden, vice president kamala harr lis and brian stevensson combined together to say use your faith to make a difference. let me applaud the president of the united states and in this month of february where we typically honor african-americans and the history of how they contributed to this nation, the president anobsed that he would nominate to the united states supreme court an african-american woman. a black woman. since 1789, march 4 was when the supreme court first organized, there's never been one of the major elements of society, first a woman, and then a black woman, who of course in slavery suffered alongside of men and children.

black women continue to be in essence beasts of burden. continuing as domestics, fighting in wars. supporting families. and intellectually some of the smartest geniuses around. they were in fact ready to be on the supreme court. they won't have a woke agenda, they won't know -- there won't be a question of whether they know a law book. let me just say -- the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady's time has expired. ms. jackson lee: it's time for a black woman on the united states supreme court. do it now. thank you, mr. president. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from wisconsin seek recognition? >> i'd like to speak for one minute. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentleman is recognized for one minute. mr. grothman: the biden immigration policy has been well documented. we've gone from about 20,000 people a month being let in the country to 90,000. between 2019 and 2020, when the number of people kicked out of the country has fallen over # 0%. what will the result be?

more people on welfare. more crime. more drugs. particularly fentanyl. more people untested for covid. but something else because apparently that doesn't bother the biden administration. you appear weak. you may not care but believe me all normal people around the world when they see we're not enforcing our immigration laws say we have a weak president. and when countries like russia or china or north korea and iran size up the united states, they look at your border policy, and say, we're dealing with a weak person. and all these decisions which are very difficult decisions to be made with all these countries are going to be that much more difficult to make because you, mr. president, are defining weakness in your immigration policy. that's the price you'll pay. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired.

members are reminded to address their remarks to a chair, not to a pretend viewing audience. perceived audience. ok. pursuant to section 11-b of house resolution 188, the house stands.

all others, (202) 748-8003. joining us now by zoom is dr. eat at mitchell, a member of the presidential cancer panel and the thomas jefferson university medical college and oncology department. dr. mitchell, thanks for your time this morning. guest: thank you for the opportunity. host: can you tell us a bit about the presidential cancer panel? what is it? guest: the panel is a part of the 1971 national cancer act signed by former president nixon . we have just celebrated the 50th anniversary of the national cancer act and the president's cancer panel consists of three independent members that give advice to the president based on

the current cancer issues in the country and we are so proud to be a part of that presidential cancer panel. host: we saw the president undergo this effort with his initial moonshot. what changes as far as what he's doing now but the goals he has established as a part of the new moonshot? guest: it's a realignment of the previous moonshot. the previous moonshot consisted mainly of research efforts. this realignment or reignition of the moonshot consists of multiple areas. including research, but including the fact that we can all participate in this program. so, therefore increasing screening, increasing

participation. and he indicated that he and the first lady, dr. jill biden, indicated that we all can participate in this. patients, caregivers, physicians, clinicians. but other members of the health care team so that everybody is involved and therefore we are all working together to further the effort. certainly the biden family has been affected by cancer, but so have many other americans been affected by cancer. and therefore, including everyone, making sure that we have cancer screening as a part of this.

because with cancer screening, we can frequently find cancers earlier so that there are better outcomes from treatment and diagnostic interventions, therefore decreasing the suffering from more individuals presenting with late stage cancer where the patient may not feel well, may have suffered many of the consequences and side effects of cancer, and therefore is less likely to respond to interventions. finding cancers early is a great part of this initiative. host: it's the idea of how much money should be tied to this effort. we saw congress give $2 billion to the previous moonshot.

there is still money left in that. what has to be considered as far as a dollar figure? guest: he did not give a dollar figure but the national cancer institute members were there for planning and congressional members were a part of the meeting yesterday, understanding that additional resources will be needed and will need to be approved for this. but there were no specific dollar figures described. but that is to come as a part of the program and a part of the representation of the presidential cancer panel. host: when it comes to the research being done on reducing cancers, we have seen probably years of research on that. what could be considered as new research that you talked about that could further the presidential goal on this?

guest: one of the new areas involves matching the tumor, the genomic profile, with new drugs so that we can adequately prevent the therapeutic interventions that are likely to give the patient a good response. so, that is one area of research. the next is defining more therapeutic interventions that might be helpful for treating cancer. those are ongoing. and the report from the cancer panel describes four critical goals and related recommendations to ensure the benefits of cancer screening for all populations. another area that is so important is access to care and making sure that everyone has

access to the interventions that are present. better screening. more participation in the screening process for cancer. the initiatives that the panel recommends involved improving communications so that health care systems, physicians, and others have better ways of communicating information. not only regarding new efforts, but also for the patient's. facilitate equitable access. this will provide an increased funding for community oriented outreach and support so that there is robust engagement of community health workers and

others to increase the access to screening for individuals. the next is strengthen workforce collaborations. if we can have all centers and members of the health care team supporting cancer screening and expanding access to the genomic and genetic access, that's another improvement. the next is to create effective health information technology to make systems work better together for the providers and for patients by creating and utilizing computable guidelines and clinical decision-making. host: do you know if any part of the presidential plan will include anything about doing the costs of drugs related to cancer? particularly if they are prohibitive for some people who are diagnosed with it?

guest: costs is very important and certainly the new era punic sarver expensive. in working with insurance companies to provide the access to care, that's a part of what we do and we have had members from the insurance companies involved and therefore creating processes that will allow for better coverage of care and better access to the interventions that are available. that's a part of the whole program. host: dr. mitchell is a clinical professor at thomas jefferson university medical college in the oncology department. thank you for your time and perspective.

guest: thank you for the -- coming up tonight on c-span president biden's remarks on the death of the global leader of isis during a u.s. special forces in in syria, then a pentagon press secretary provides an update on the u.s. counterterrorism rate. after that the 70th national prayer breakfast. ♪

♪ >> this morning president biden announced the death of the global leader of isis during a u.s. forces operation in syria.

president biden: good morning. last night, operating on my orders, the united states military forces successfully suy removed a major terrorist threat to the world, the global leader of isis. he took over as leader of isis in 2019 after the united states counterterrorism operation killed the last leader. since then isis has directed terrorist operations targeting americans, our allies and our partners and countless civilians in the middle east, africa and in south asia. he oversaw the spread of isis groups around the world after savaging communities and murdering innocents. he was responsible for the recent brutal attack on a prison in northeast syria, holding isis

fighters, which was swiftly addressed by our brave partners in the syrian democratic forces. he was the driving force behind the genocide of people in northwestern iraq in 2014. we all remember the gut wrenching stories of mass slaughts that are wiped out entire villages -- slaughters that wiped out entire villages, thousands of women and young girls sold into slavery, rape used as a weapon of war. thanks to the bravery of our troops this horrible terrorist leader is no more. our forces carried out the operation with their signature preparation and precision and i directed the department of defense to tairveg precaution possible to minimize civilian casualties. knowing this terrorist has chosen to surround himself with families, including children, we made a choice to pursue a special forces raid at a much greater risk to our own people, rather than targeting him with an air strike.

our team is still compiling the report but we do know that as our troops approached to capture the terrorist in a final act of desperate cowardess, with no regard to the lives of hoins family or others in the building, he chose to blow himself up, not just with a vest burks to blow up that third floor. rather than face justice for the crimes he's committed. taking several members of his family with him, just as his predecessor did. i'm grateful for the immense courage and skill and determination of our u.s. forces who skillfully executed this incredibly challenging mission. the members of our military are the solid, steel backbone of our administration. ready to fly into danger at a moment's notice to keep our country and the american people safe, as well as our allies. i'm also grateful to the families of our service members. you serve right alongside these soldiers and sailors and marines, special forces, loved ones, giving them the strength

and support they need to do what they do. to our service members and their families, we're forever grateful for what you do for us and we owe you a debt. thank you. we're also aided by the essential partnership of the syrian democratic forces. i want to commend our dedicated intelligence community, the department of defense and members of our national security team throughout the government whose meticulous and tireless work over the course of many months ensured that this mission succeeded. this operation is testament to america's reach and capability to take out terrorist threats no matter where they try to hide, anywhere in the world. i'm determined to protect the american people from terrorist threats and i'll take decisive action to protect this country. and will continue working with our close allies and partners, the syrian democratic forces, iraqi security forces, including the kurdish and more than 80 members of the global coalition to keep pressure on isis to

protect our homeland. we remain vigilant, we remain prepared. last night's operation took a major terrorist leader off the battlefield and it sent a strong message to terrorists around the world, we will come after you and find you. once again, today we continue our unceasing effort to keep the american people safe and to strengthen the security of our allies and partners around the world. i thank you all and may god bless you and may god protect our troops. i'm heading off to new york right now. i'm late. thank you for your time. appreciate it. reporter: mr. president. >> mr. president. how many u.s. troops were involved, sir? reporter: mr. president, how many civilian casualties were there? [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] [captions copyright national

cable satellite corp. 2022] announcer: president biden and vice president harris delivered remarks during the 70th national chair breakfast. they joined the cochairs of the event along with human rights activists. watch tonight at 9:00 p.m. eastern on c-span, online at c-span.org, or watch full coverage on our new video app, c-span now. c-span offers a variety of podcasts. washington today gives you the latest from the nation's capital. book notes plus has in-depth interviews with writers about their latest works, while the weekly uses audio from elements archive to look at how issues of the day developed over years, and our series features conversations with historians about their life at work. many of our television programs are available as podcasts.

you can find them all on the c-span now mobile app or wherever you get your podcasts. ♪ announcer: our u.s. intelligence agencies repaired for espionage threats facing the states from china, russia, iran, and north korea? we examine that question sunday on q&a with a senior fellow, the author of spies, lies, and algorithms. >> we are living in a moment of reckoning akin to 9/11 where the intelligence community as to undergo a rapid transformation to deal with the threats driven by new technology. i think about these threats driven by technologies. more threats that can work across vast distances in

cyberspace, rats are moving at faster paces than they were before, more data intelligence analyst have to confront in the world, more customers that do not have security clearances that need intelligence, people like voters who need to understand for an election interference, and more competitors, and that is the most challenging war. u.s. intelligence agencies do not dominate the collection and analysis of information like they did in the cold war. announcer: amy segar with her book spies, lies, and algorithms. you can listen to duende and all of our -- q&a and all of our podcasts on our new c-span now up -- app. announcer: pentagon secretary john kirby provided an update on the isis leader that died in a security raid. this is about 40 minutes.