our intelligence confirms this, russia is preparing new troops. meanwhile, iran and israel have stopped shelling, the past night in the middle east was calm, and a number of media outlets, citing us intelligence, report that american missiles did not destroy the ford nuclear facility in iran.

explosions were heard in russia. the rostov region of russia was attacked by drones. in taganrog , the forta arena stadium was damaged. the roof caught fire and the wall collapsed. later, the governor of the region clarified that it was a building sports complex avangard, but wrote that it is located at the address sportivnaya street 2a, and this is the address of fort arena. in addition, windows were knocked out in the local lyceum and two apartment buildings. according to the governor, there are no victims. drones, according to him , were also shot down in azov, radeonovo, nesvitaysky, myasnikovsky and neklinovsky districts of the rostov region.

devices. in addition, tonight, the airports of penza, ulyanovsk, samara, cheboksary, kazan, nizhnekamsk and saratov did not receive or send flights. and further, a video from saratov. in short, the siren, there was just a bang, but not a super hard one. the russian ministry of defense claims that they intercepted 18 ukrainian drones over five russian regions and occupied crimea. next is a video from tatarstan, where the authorities turned off mobile internet in the wake of the attack.

don't panic, son, that's it, that's it, that's it, honey, don't be afraid, don't be afraid, will you turn on the internet for me or not, i came to kazan, i don't have internet, since the beginning of june, dozens of regions in russia have started to turn off mobile internet, arguing that combating drones, a number of experts believe that this does not prevent drones, but is only necessary for reporting to the kremlin, tonight the russian... the army launched a series of strikes on zaporizhia and kharkov, at least eight people were injured. the military administration of zaporizhia showed these shots of the aftermath of the strike, they said that the city was attacked after midnight, two people were injured, nine private houses and cars were damaged. kharkov mayor igor terikhov reported that russia attacked the city at night with seven shaheds. the strikes were carried out on a civilian enterprise and unoccupied residential buildings. one casualty is known. in the kupin and kharkiv regions, russian troops dropped an air bomb on a nine-story building. the head of the region negu.

about five casualties. in the ukrainian city of dnipro. today is a day of mourning. yesterday, russian troops launched a missile strike on the city. it was the most destructive for dnipro since the beginning of russia's full-scale invasion of ukraine. this morning, the death toll in the city increased to 18 people. the number of victims is approaching 300. the missile strike, in particular , damaged a passenger train that was traveling from odessa to zaporozhye. in total , almost 50 multi-story buildings, about 40 educational institutions, eight buildings. medical institutions, 16 district and house boiler houses were damaged in dnepr. such data is provided by the city mayor boris filatov. monday and tuesday were the deadliest days in terms of the number of victims of russian shelling in ukraine in many months. nine people died in kiev, at least twenty killed in sumy, kherson, donetsk and odessa regions. the total number of deaths in 2 days reached 47 people. the american tv channel cnn notes that russia has increased the intensity of air strikes on ukraine against the backdrop of the nato summit in the netherlands, which volodymyr zelensky went to.

our intelligence confirms this, russia is preparing new military operations on nato territory, that is, on the territory of your countries. this war is now going on in ukraine. and we need to prepare well, we must be ready without a doubt stop putin now in ukraine, but we must also understand that his goals go beyond ukraine. volodymyr zelensky said at the last nato summit that russia could attack a nato country in the next 5 years to test the strength of the alliance. a similar statement was made by the president of the european commission ursula fonder and the general secretary of the security council mark ruthe. well, yesterday was late. in the evening, the nato summit was attended by us president donald trump . my colleague elena abramovich is working at the summit in the hague. hello, lena. please tell us what to expect today. from the summit will trump and zelensky meet? good morning, timofey, well donald trump is supposed

to meet with volodymyr zelensky today after the main session of the nato summit, which should end at half past twelve in the afternoon, already at 13:50 negotiations between trump and zelensky are planned, we were informed. the us also wrote that the meeting will take place after the main session, trump himself, on the way to gaga, talking to journalists on board the plane, said that it is possible to meet with volodymyr zelensky. do you think you will meet with zelensky when will you be there? yeah, i'll probably see him. what would you say to him? i'll say, how are you, it's tough, he's in a tough situation, he shouldn't have been there. see, it will be necessary but you know, i would like to see an agreement with russia, as you know, vladimir called me, he said, "can i help you with iran?" i said, "no, i don't need help

with iran, i need help with you, and i hope we can make a deal with russia." it's unfortunate, 600 soldiers died last week. politics also writes that... press conferences on the results of this nato summit, trump is going to talk about the strikes on iran no less than about the main topic of this summit, this excess, the increase in defense spending by 2 times for the alliance countries to 5% of gdp. before flying to the hague, he published a number of posts on his social network stрус social, in which he practically gave orders to israel to turn its planes around and not to bomb iran, and also posted a personal message in a signal from nato secretary general markaryut, and ... in that message, ruta congratulated and thanked trump for decisive actions against iran, that is, the bunker buster strikes on nuclear sites that the us carried out on sunday night. trump also said that the decision to bomb was truly extraordinary and that no one else

would have dared to do it. and he added that he would have a great success at the gaga summit, because despite the difficulties, nato countries agreed on a defense spending target of 5%. donald, you have brought us to a very, very important moment for america, europe and the world. you will achieve what no american president has ever achieved. couldn't achieve it in a decade. europe is going to spend a lot of money, as it should, and this will be

your victory. after this post by trump, journalists here on the sidelines of the summit doubted that this was a genuine message, but ryuta's office confirmed that he really wrote it, and then a journalist... as for the 5% and the new spending target, of course we have to do it for our security, but do you really think that if donald trump were not president, then tomorrow we would come to this 5%, do you believe it, i no, well, and in the evening at the king's dinner, rutto sat at the same table with donald trump, on the right hand of the us president sat the prime minister of italy giorgia molonia, i will remind you that trump invited only european leaders to his inauguration. and the italian media write that trump and molonia had a long conversation discussing the main international affairs, starting with the latest events in the middle east. to the left of the us president sat the king of the netherlands, and there at his table were the czech presidents, peter pavel and turkish president

recep erdogan, with whom trump also spoke separately. volodymyr zelensky was also at the dinner, but it was impossible to see exactly where he was placed in the footage provided. zelensky arrived in the hague a day ago. managed to speak at a defense forum, and hold a series of talks and address the dutch parliament, where he recalled a topic that is relevant to donald trump, iran, he spoke about russian strikes on the city of dnepr and that. russia could never do this without his connections with the regime in iran, and we in ukraine would never have been able to shoot down most of these drones without your solidarity and the support of our partners, this fact speaks for itself. the arms package cup, as he announced last week before the g7 summit, on the sidelines of which he never managed to meet with

the us president, since trump then very quickly left that summit, and the current nato summit was made as short as possible especially for donald trump, the main session is only 2.5 hours, then zelensky will meet with the leaders of five countries, britain, france, germany, italy and poland, in may, by the way, in such a company they called trump, maybe this time he will join them personally, but that's all. well, before the start of the summit, the american agency bloomberg published possible scenarios for russia's attack on nato countries. the most likely scenario, according to analysts, is an attack on the baltic countries: russia can deploy its fleet to the baltic sea and sever land connections with poland in the suvalov corridor. latvia, lithuania and estonia should ask for this. belarus may ask for protection and counterattack russia, and even if nato does not give

a collective response, help should come from neighboring countries, then russia, bloomberg writes, will strike military targets and critical infrastructure in germany, poland, sweden and finland. russia will threaten with nuclear weapons, and this may limit the response from european nuclear powers. bloomberg notes that he gives an extreme scenario, which nato military planners are considering. donald trump in the pretext. journalists bloomberg scenario may be slow to respond instead of real action post social in true a post with a call for peace and an offer to europe, i quote, to talk to vladimir, and although european intelligence does not believe that russia already has a clear plan for war on nato territory, russia is now rebuilding its forces is increasing its weapons stockpiles faster than the west, - writes bumberg. let me remind you that in december 21 , the bilt publication published a map of a possible russian invasion of ukraine, on which all the main directions for russian army strikes were marked, including an offensive from belarus and from occupied crimea.

russian officials joked about this publication of the publication denied the possibility of russia's invasion. when russia attacked ukraine in february of 22, it turned out that the plans of the russian army almost completely coincided with the scheme published by bilt. vladimir putin on monday, speaking to russian military and security forces graduates of the military universities, said that he knows that nato countries should agree to increase defense spending at the next summit. he called this a provocation of global militarization and an arms race , and said that talk of a russian threat is just a scare story. in justifying their plans, the alliance leadership is once again repeating about some kind of threat from russia, about some kind of possible invasion of europe, they themselves came up with this scare story and repeat it year after year in order to deceive their own people and pull out of... their money, but here again we are faced with the usual

and shameless lies. joining us is jan matveyev, a military analyst. good morning, jan. good morning. well, how do you, in putin's words, the scarecrow, how plausible does bloomberg's map seem to you, and does russia even have any free forces for a war, even with the baltic countries? right now, of course, russia does not have. forces to wage another fairly large war, it is unlikely, and putin will be against someone attack while the war in ukraine is going on, but as soon as it ends one way or another, if we see that troops are being transferred from there, freed up, and somewhere they are being accumulated in another place, then yes, then the risk will become, well, one could say, maximum, as for this map, the military's assumptions, they are quite... justified, of course, not very detailed, everything in such general terms, but in general

yes, this seems to be true, with only one addition that while the russian army is fighting in ukraine, it cannot fight somewhere else, but the timeframes, so to speak, for the restoration of russian troops after the war in ukraine are called different, including up to six months, that is, this is a very short period, the russian army will be able to switch to a new one very quickly... in general, this is possible, that is, it is still difficult to assess the army's ability to really restore itself while it is spending all its forces in ukraine, but... it seems that this is a more or less realistic timeframe, of course, it will not be a full-fledged, well-armed army, but given the small military contingents that are located in the baltic countries, and this army will be enough to create very serious problems to seize the territory, so yes, such a risk exists, and as soon as putin finishes

fighting in ukraine, after peace negotiations or something else, if the army is not... russia even some combat donkeys, if you look at the z-channels, will russia really be able to restore everything that it lost in ukraine in six months, do you understand how much the russian military industry is currently able to supply the needs of the russian army, now the russian army uses little equipment on the front line, because this equipment is very quickly destroyed

by drones, just this week there was one attack, by russian armored forces it led to a complete defeat, drones simply destroyed tanks, armored vehicles , therefore russian warriors simply do not bring tanks to the front line and so on, they mainly attack now with just infantry, therefore these same tanks they accumulate in a certain quantity, because factories continue to produce them, recently there was a large study cit, they counted more than two... tanks a year new are produced, perhaps even up to 300 more, this is a serious number, maybe this is a somewhat overestimated estimate, but nevertheless we know for sure that more than 100 tanks are guaranteed to be produced, now they are practically not lost, which means they are accumulated, they are simply not used, they are not particularly shown on the front lines, the same is true for armored vehicles,

for bmpp, large the russian army has problems with transport, of course, they can't help but use transport and it constantly gets lost, i mean the most ordinary civilian cars, loaves of bread and the like, motorcycles, donkeys, as you say, they do come across, but for attacks over short distances for some local attacks, after all, the baltic countries are small, there is a border with either russia on all sides.

activates the fifth article, if the us does not come to the rescue, in that case europe, as far as it will be able defend the baltics with their own forces? theoretically, it is possible, everything depends on the political will, whether they are ready to use their troops in a really big bloody war, because now all the military and politicians soberly see absolutely clearly, without any fantasies, what huge... losses russia and ukraine have during the war, and naturally, if german, polish, french, british troops confront the russian army, despite their training, the quality of weapons, there will still be losses very serious, here, if they really decide,

if they send troops, it is clear that various technological, so to speak, parts of their armed... forces will be, they will use aviation, navy, and there the losses will most likely be minimal, but without a land component, it will not be possible to normally defend the baltic countries from putin's invasion, here everything will depend on a political decision, of course , europe is not ready to wage a multi-year war with putin now, but it is quite possible that putin he himself will not be able to wage a long-term war in europe in the baltic countries after a long bloody war with ukraine, and if he manages to arrange such a dense defense that will stop russian troops at the very beginning, then everything will end, but if the war continues later, then without the help of the usa, of course, it will not work out, even without nuclear weapons, simply at the expense of the troops themselves, weapons,

ammunition, because russia has been waging a full-scale war for 3 years, has established a military industry, is mobilizing, constantly recruiting new people. yan, thank you very much, yan matveyev, a military analyst, was a guest on our air. now about russia's closest ally, iran. the us strikes on three iranian nuclear facilities did not destroy the iranian nuclear program, but only set back iran's progress in creating nuclear weapons by several months. several american media outlets wrote about this on tuesday. the new york times writes that us military intelligence came to this conclusion, in particular, according to the newspaper's sources, in a secret the intelligence report says that the sites hit by the u.s. military were not as... as bad as the trump administration had hoped. the strike destroyed only a small portion of iran's nuclear material. the country's authorities managed to move and hide

most of its enriched uranium stockpiles. the strikes left the entrances to two nuclear facilities collapsed, but the underground bunkers themselves remained intact. it is unclear from the new york times article what sites were being targeted. the fact that the american strikes did not completely destroy iran's nuclear program , citing sources and findings. the sena tv channel also reported intelligence. the financial times newspaper writes that iranian president masoud pezheshkian said in an address to the nation that israel had failed to destroy the country's nuclear facilities and scientific potential. but the white house, where cnn turned for comments, denied the channel's information and called the cnn source's sources a loser. here's what the white house press secretary wrote on social media x. this is an assumed assessment of the completely was not true and was classified as top secret, but was leaked to cnn anyway by anonymous low-level losers in the intelligence community. everyone knows

what happens when 14-30 pound bombs are dropped accurately on targets, total destruction. and here's how us president donald trump commented on cnn's information that us strikes did not completely destroy iran's nuclear program. its nuclear program, absolutely not, that facility under the mountain, it was destroyed, i think cnn should apologize to the pilots, i think messonbc

should apologize, i think these guys are really these cable networks are real losers. the facility under the mountain that trump is talking about is the iranian ford plant, where they enriched uranium. it was on it that american b2 fighters dropped bunker buster. bombs according to the new york times, the us ships damaged the power supply system of the nuclear facility, but overall the complex was not destroyed, this is the assessment of israeli intelligence. it is unclear how quickly iran will be able to access this facility and conduct there's repairs going on. the white house, as you've heard, believes that the facility was completely destroyed. ruslan suleimanov, stkvet, our guest on the air. good morning. good morning, hello. ruslan, the first question: do you understand that the war in the middle east is over or not? the escalation stage between iran and israel, iran and the united states has ended, but

it's definitely impossible to say that this is the complete end of the conflict. hostility remains on both sides, at least the ideology of rejection itself remains israel in tehran, and israel accordingly will not remain in debt, so this twelve-day escalation was stopped, but no one guarantees that this escalation will not resume after some time, well, that is, today the shelling may resume, it will already be a thirteen-day war, and not twelve, i do not think that today is exactly what is needed, at least a respite is needed, each of the parties, as we see, declares itself the winner, each of the parties has a triumph, that is, for now. apparently, at this stage of the conflict the potential is exhausted, but in the future, again, ideology is not going away, the problem of the iranian nuclear

program is not going away, and so on, these are... those problems that will have to be returned to anyway, and no one is ruling out a resumption of the conflict, plus, let's not forget that the war in the gaza strip is not over, and this is the conflict that is fueling all the other events in the middle east. ruslan, and you, looking at iranian sources, at official statements from the authorities, which version do you lean towards, did you manage to the us to destroy the iranian nuclear program or not? in order to really establish how... what is the scale of the destruction, what damage to the facilities, especially in fardo, a ground inspection is necessary. now, of course, such an inspection is impossible, iran will not allow international observers, but for its part it can say whatever it wants, we hear how the iranian authorities loudly declare that no, everything is in order, the iranian nuclear program is intact. of course, damage has been done, of course,

the program has been abandoned. back, but there is knowledge, there are still nuclear physicists who are capable of developing this program, continuing this program, there are a huge number of hidden objects, hidden centrifuges, which iran has not shown to international observers for many years, there is, after all, the nuclear power plant in bushehr, where there is an operating reactor, and as is known. one of the by- products of the reactor is plutonium, which can also potentially become an element for creating nuclear weapons, so iran's nuclear program is definitely not finished and vice versa, recent events have strengthened the iranian authorities in the idea that it is necessary to acquire nuclear weapons as soon as possible, well , these objects that you listed are of course under close

attention. american and israeli military, and physicists and nuclear scientists have long been hunted by israeli intelligence services and periodically successfully. if we assume that iran and israel have now stopped the escalation, the war is suspended at this stage, will iran continue to help russia in the war against ukraine by the same forces? yes, in my opinion, these are unrelated stories during this war. no one mentioned, say, from israel or from the united states, from european officials, that iran is actively supporting russia in the war in ukraine, so of course, cooperation between moscow and tehran will continue, but i think it will be complicated by the fact that iran itself will need to restore,

to establish the work of its armed forces, yes, in principle, moscow got everything it wanted, if we are talking about the same drones, martyrs, then, as is known, russia can already independently produce these drones in yelabuga, in tatarstan. dmitry peskov, putin's press secretary, said that russia helped iran with its clear position. in addition to this clear position, can we only give some more help from moscow to tehran, i mean military help? no. and the russian authorities, starting with putin, spoke about this directly, they also said that moscow has no military obligations, say, under the treaty on strategic cooperation, which was signed at the beginning of this year, da and tehran did not expect that moscow would somehow help militarily , the only help is really diplomatic support at

various venues, be it the iaea. kremlin, that the kremlin supports iran with its clear position, and iran supports moscow with ballistic missiles and drones. well, after all, in return, russia also supplied some technologies, some. before the current escalation, yes, the tehranis counted on something more, for a larger number of deliveries, say, of su aircraft, but nevertheless, we don’t even know to the end to what extent, to what extent the kremlin transferred its military, space, perhaps even nuclear technologies, because this information is never disclosed, for example, if we are talking about goods...