tv Check-in Deutsche Welle December 11, 2020 1:30am-2:01am CET
the tears and talk with people experiencing a changing environment. the ice disappears earlier and it keeps retreating were future depends on what happens here. more than once within the arctic circle church december 21st d.w. . francis in a turbulent autumn with the pandemic only part of the reason ongoing street protests against police violence multiple terrorist attacks now president barack obama wants to take back control this legislation that critics see as a repressive turn to the right following terror attacks in october a new draft law to curb the influence of islamism would make it easier to inspect or shut radical mosques limit home schooling and otherwise widen the government's powers to restrict behavior deemed harmful to the values of the republic critics
see those values themselves as at risk of being undermined the legislation along with a draft security law is sparking pushback and protests are title today can france stop the cycle of violence. welcome to to the point it's a pleasure to introduce our guests. tsonga works for the berlin based think tank s w p with a focus on counterterrorism policy in the european union and he says the islamist threat for europe remains high but france seems to have the wrong focus in its fight against terrorism. and great to have with us once again jeff stripes she works as an author and journalist and says the entire game is between the right wing conservatives and the left wing secular cabs in france. reveals the weaknesses
of a country where the rules are democracy transparency responsibility dialogue compromise are still not solidly anchored. and we're very pleased to welcome. she is a sociologist at the university of life and she says france currently has a highly bellicose rhetoric not only leads to extreme polarization but also prevents debate on historical and social issues. let me start by asking you bust song because you say you acknowledge that the threat is high the french government says that it is simply aiming at reinforcing principles of secularism and gender equality what's so misguided about. well it's the risk to conflate these much bigger social issues which do have to be tackled with the more specific threat of terrorism and i'm not saying that the reason some
connection but it would be advisable to rather be focused on specific counterterrorism measures and then have a separate debate as far as possible and as it's done now really sort of fosters polarization and read it accentuates the so the polarization and polarization of course was one of the problems that you mentioned. you accuse the government of bellicose rhetoric but the prime minister firmly denies that this law is anti islam or even anti religion saying the goal is emancipation from religious fundamentalism in fact separation of religion and state is a long standing tradition in france it is true it's a it's a longstanding tradition but i think their words are very powerful so if you constantly use the word war in when you want to prevent something then it creates a kind of atmosphere that it's you know it has. this feel like people
have this fear of being in a in a civil war and everybody agrees that the enemy comes from within but nobody takes the time to really define where and who the enemy is and this creates a very ambiguous situation which can become very dangerous for democracy. you say the rules of democracy are still not solidly anchored in france that will come as a surprise to many viewers who see france as one of the cradles of democracy and republicanism. yes the different prizes the thralls is facing right now because there are many crisis not only islamism are bringing up to the surface different structural problems that france has been. for 102030 years and why all the structural problem is an institutional problem the fact that the power isn't concentrated in the hands of one man the president nowadays mcconnell at the
expense of the parliament and also the fact that the power is concentrated in one side which is paris at the expense of the region. is then edging the idea of compromise dialogue which is actually very important in a democracy the other structural problem that this crisis is showing what you mentioned the tradition of secularism this tradition of secularism was normally intended to be a kind of framework for the relationship between states and the church and now it's being instrument allies against islam this is the 2nd structural problem and the 3rd would be the relationship that france has was it's called past brutal can have a past and as far as hasn't really faced this history which of course creates resentment among the muslim community let's come back
to that in just a moment but i would 1st like to take a closer look at the threat to which the government is responding more than 250 people have died in terror attacks in france over the past 5 years that is more than any other western country during the same period. in mid october history teacher somewhere party was killed and beheaded in the middle of the street in a paris suburb the perpetrator. islamist is noted the teacher had showed caricature of the prophet muhammad from the magazine shot during his lessons as an example of freedom of expression. that was followed by an attack on. religious freedom less than 2 weeks later during a non-person in a church 3 people were killed and several were injured. shortly before the stabbing the perpetrator had travelled illegally to france. a few days later friends
commemorated the $130.00 people killed and hundreds injured in paris on nov 13th 2015 on that day multiple attacks were carried out at several locations in the city including a stadium and at a concert in about a clint theater the audience terrorist group took credit for the attacks which many french people view as an assault on their liberal values. there have been 260 islamist motivated attacks in france since 2012. the country is gripped by fear of another attack what are the right strategies in the fight against terrorism. yes you know how is it really so surprising that the french government resorts to martial rhetoric after dealing with this kind of a threat for 5 years yes and no it's not surprising because france
has also like you know had the tradition of brutal at tax and having recourse to. repression in a certain way. but also know it should not be the answer i guess like to have a very very warlike missile rick that we have also seen in the war on terror right i mean like the. the the words are very important and i think we shouldn't we shouldn't let this happen that as if there was a civil war going on. i would like to add i mean the threat is considerable but we are really not in the same situation as in 2015 to 17 anymore so it doesn't help making this all the time but our core i mean there are things to be taken care of but at the current moment we had individual attackers improvised means who killed their a few people i don't want to really great this but we shouldn't be panicking in other words the scale of the threat now is smaller than it was at that time well we
can all do well there will be a new major attack but the sequence of attacks has not been of the same quality and there isn't a need to respond forcefully just not in how has this series of attacks how has it affected the french society in general how is france changed let's say since the dough and about equal. there is a real jim on for more authority from the society and you can see actually that of course the evolution of this terrorist attack going hand in hand was the evolution of french society wanting more and more these kind of responses to mccraw and the government giving now to this. and this separatism we're talking about you were mentioning the civil war that the government is actually fostering we must not forget actually where that comes from and that the muslim brothers gehad.
they are the 1st to use the vocabulary of them and us. the infidels who deserve this so we should also be very aware of where the problem comes from i want to come back to the separatist aspect in just a moment but let me ask you to talk a little bit about the particular situation in france because as i understand it an unusually high share of european jihadists are in fact young. frenchman why is that what makes france unique well one could give a very long answer to that but 1st of all of course france has the biggest muslim population in europe and it does have some structural problems with belt so there is a potential reservoir of native people who don't who are in search of a new identity of alternative identity and that is exploited by certain actors so i would also say this is the 2nd part of the equation that's not only
a structural problem but also active recruitment and active ideology and fronts and heritage some of this already in the ninety's from the algerian wars and there is a particular north african networks at work here so it's historically grown threats it's persisted serious because it's it's not of a new quality and hence i don't think there is a need to last a loft a law to repress it and. let me again come back to the topic of polarization because. i touched upon the french government actually sees polarization as rooted in separatism saying that islamised social services radical mosques are creating parallel worlds and values that are diametrically opposed to the values of french republicanism is there something to that argument i mean it's clear that there has been
a violent incident and brutal incident i mean there is and there are problems in that but at the same time to go back to the rhetorical and say they started it and they're going to continue this would only. suppression will only will only increase violence again right i mean if they started it then we will have to again go back to the roots of the problem which is not only then cough it cofer but also like you know problems that you have also mentioned colonialism. social problems racism so we we cannot just. just. say that there is a problem and we're just going to use oppression you know then you talked about french values values of democracy in your opening statement is there an argument here that if france truly wants to reinforce the fundamental principles of the republic it should be doing more for it and talk to me today those 2 founding
values equality and brotherhood. i'm not sure actually the problems are really linked i would say it's much more linked to the cornell past of force and the problems france has to integrate the 2nd 3rd generation of those who came after the morris specifically 2 from us one big problem of france is that they build cities in the parish very to you know to welcome these these migrants coming from the former colonies so that. these born you know what we name born jew and this was actually translated as suburbs yes it is which actually exposes as you know and so it's also also an urban mistake exclusion and i think this kind of his conclusion is even stronger than social inequality.
income or are all you know it's this physical exclusion of muslim communities out of the city center. in one french village where numerous young people have actually joined the islamics islamic state the mayor says that the government partly at least bears responsibility for doing too little to integrate them is this ultimately also about social exclusion and is a serial killer to clamp down simply easier than perhaps putting into place the kind of social reforms that would really make a difference. well security measures always better to communicate but of course to really do them effectively is maybe just as hard as promoting integration but you know i think every case is slightly different and i fully agree there is a problem with the bomb you at the same time we also see that not all the attackers
have come from this kind of particular setting that we have cases like in the village where it's other forms of social network to drive people to attacks there is no one size fits all explanation what i would be in general more concerned about france is that france has been late with preventive strategies in comparison to strong repressive strategies they recognize it. is a topic of discussion but there is a lot of talk and seemingly very little structural changes happening afterwards and so i think that will be a very negative outcome of this debate if one is to change it but it might be just presidential declarations and no infrastructures to really make it happen. meanwhile parallel to this debate over the new law on islam as i'm france has also been saying ongoing protests over police violence and also over a new security law that would limit citizens ability to film examples of police repression president is fond of saying that french democracy is color blind that if
you're a french citizen it simply absolutely doesn't matter what color your skin is is he wrong just france have a problem with not only dealing with its colonial history but simply with racism michael is also the one he said. if you don't have to the. right color like the right skin color you are controlled 3 times more he also admits that there is a problem a structural problem racism problem within the police but also within the larger french community and it's very unfortunate that these 2. laws are discussed at the same time right i mean the law on the general security and the law against islam islam which is actually not named islam is a myth it used to be cold separates them and now we're like they're calling it again. strengthening the principles of republic of the republic say republican
principles so i think they're micron or the general debate is not clear about which what who the enemy is again and the debate is very emotional so i think there are the actions that are extremely emotional from the side of the state that can really be a problem and make people who don't belong to the majority society in threat that you're going to would you say that france has a problem with systemic racism at least on the part of the police oh yes like like every country i mean you know are the one of the problem of the police abuses in france is also just linked also to the way the police is strained. there was since june the this june of this year the training of the police has been reduced of from 12 in the school to 8 months so you see
a young polish man arriving and try you know to maintain the order and expose their situations having a rifle you know are sold frightful sometimes and they are not absolutely not trained in germany the focus is much more on ethic social skills and soft skills and this is not taught in from us so i don't know if the problem the racial structural problem is more is worse in france and in germany but the preventive way to prevent it is of course. there we can from us. not only from muslims within france but also from a number of countries abroad especially muslim countries there has been a backlash in reaction to the government's response to the recent terrorist attacks
even including calls to boycott french goods why has this touch such a nerve abroad and should not be worried well domestically and maybe only strengthens and but it takes 2 to tango maybe we could say i mean i wouldn't put the blame squarely on microland to sort of make an aggressive rhetoric and sort of al you made was sort of muslim countries i mean of course everyone was happy to jump on it and make his own domestic points for that and sort of sort of pretends he's the protector so i mean that's the trap we're seeing and so i think probably more cruel and selfish as assad would maybe be domestically strengthened by it but mr gigi point of view for europe as a whole i think would all be better served giving all for 2 people who like to take up and say look they don't like us and i'm your leader after all even if you live in europe i think that's something we should really avoid so that may come back to the point that you made about it possibly strengthening mccraw domestically because
the fact is following the latest terrorist attack security has high priority not only for the president but also for many french citizens crackdown on islam islam is supported by a majority of voters according to polls with a wide majority saying france is form of secularism in danger. our citizens must be protected our citizens of islamic faith must be protected against the evil of radical islam. i'm saying this because the intention of the islamists the intention of these ideologues is to turn part of our population against the republic. and we cannot let that happen. but. speaking of resonating with citizens and voters would you say that the vote on the new law on islam is and which is scheduled for october 2021 is this very much about
french elections and are we seeing essentially the french government motivated as much by political opportunism as by principle. i think they are the way the words mobilized within the right wing since years is really trying to add it to the 3 pillars like this. and to get to as part of from ons has been there already and i think michael is trying not to lose the. right to being part of the society and put a lot of emphasis on without taking the time again. to define what it is that what has been what what what he was historically and what it came to represent today being that unique french form of secularism. dean to what extent
can micron be sure of continuing domestic political support for this course if i look at recent polls they show 79 percent of the france french agree that islam isn't is at war with france 72 percent of socialist voters also agreed with 90 percent on the center right that is pretty astonishing level of support do you think that will begin to wobble. well actually there is. a sheesh inside the political families themselves. many of the left are actually traditionally very secular so they would be for a little on the separatism in the name of sacred reason but many another part of the list is actually defending the old so a little bit like you know the religion of the poor or the religion of the koran
eyes which is also a tradition on the left and on the right there is also a separation in the right from the between those who defend religion you know conservative cattle a.q. circles and those like you for example or the minister of interior who are leading a real war for secularism which is actually an excuse for a war against islam is and so it is instrumental izing secularism to actually the war again against islamism and we are celebrating this 150 years of the rule of separation of the state and the church 905 and this new law was announced on that very 1st yes yes but it is a perversion of this original fail let me take us back yesterday you can speak to one moment but maybe because we're almost out of time combine it with another look
at our title we asked whether this can stop the cycle of violence what would be needed to stop it well 1st of all we are not in this terrorist planning cycle no i let me repeat this point we have attacks but we're not well we're so we are forced to take a breath and calm down and i think that would be the 1st thing that should happen then yes we should separate these kind of debates about counterterrorism and why do structural debates as far as paul. that would also help to defuse the tension and let me ask about this domestic issue and lot of french domestic policy expert but a colleague of mine made a very interesting analysis that showed well coal came to policy you know he's not right nor left but now the party system is so fragmented that that doesn't work anymore so he has to go to the right and there is actually a growing population in the countryside in contrast to many other countries the rural france is growing and that's also one of the reasons why he's probably going in this direction so all together i think let's just kind of the steam and i don't
think france has to do anything actually. do you think that can unite this very divided country divided not only by islamist separatism but obviously very divided in other respects as well i don't think so not with a war like he cannot do that and at the moment i think he is pushing also. the law that supposedly that is going to supposedly. ban filming the police and i think it's a very very quiet wrong direction. going. geraldine in 2 sentences the right approach well i redefined freedom you know freedom is not only the freedom of express yourself but it's also the freedom for others to practice their religion thank you very much thanks to all of you for being with us today and thanks to you out there for tuning in see you soon.
crimes are commonplace in the west balkan countries. come drug lords a biased legal system and corrupt politicians are responsible for. the be. suckers. 90 minutes on the road. with him had a big gun because suckers were lions i know if i had known the boat would be 1000 small i never would have gone on a trip to see if i would not have put myself and my harrison in the danger of the god of the game of the going to give us leave would. love on sunday because that
one little bit of that is i'm i have serious problems on a personal level and i was unable to live there but this month i'm going to. want to know their story and for migrants terrified and reliable information for margaret's. look closely. listen carefully to. suit your needs to do a good. job to. discover who. subscribe to the documentary on to.
play. this is. news from berlin the u.s. takes a towards conquering the coronavirus and makes good advisory panel endorses the buy on take 5 the vaccine as the country sees more than $3000.00 deaths in a single day. also coming up the $1.00 trillion euro budget for the e.u. gets the go ahead poland and hungary has been blocking passage of the budget the bitter dispute is now over the new spending plan also includes billions in coronavirus relief.