howard kurtz, we hope you liked it. check out our home page, too we will be back next sunday at 11 o'clock and 5:00 p.m. for the latest buzz. >> i am chrisll hillary clinton nation an f.b.i. investigation over the handling of special secrets on her personal e-mail? >> i did not e-mail any classified federal to anyone on my e-mail. >> we are all accountable to the american people to get the facts right. i will do my part. >> plus --. >> they are at a loss, right? >> the fall out over a new planned parenthood undercover video and what it means for the abortion debate. we will discuss both issues with presidential candidate carly

fiorina debates jesse mcintosh. >> rand paul tries to re-ignite the his base. >> we will ask the senator about a strategy to regain the momentum ahead of the first presidential debate. >> our sunday group weighs in on a slump in the polls for clinton. and donald trump's threat to run as a third-party candidate. >> look, i'm a republican. i'm a conservative. i'm in first place. >> all right now on fox news sunday. >> hello again from fox news in washington. hillary clinton's campaign has been hit by a bombshell. news that two inspectors general have sent a referral to the f.b.i. about the mishandling of classified information on her private mail account. in a moment we will have a

debate between republican presidential candidate carly fiorina and a top official of emily's list about that and the underscore planned parenthood votes. first, though we will get the latest from ed henry. >> this weekend, hillary clinton is trying to finally rip the band-aid off and get this scandal behind her but there are new signs today that more mill and even legal problems could be coming. >> i never sent or received any information classified at the time i was sent and received. >> eager to turn the page on the maim troubles hillary clinton abruptly reeved open saturday she will testify before the house select committee on benghazi in october setting up a showdown with the republican chairman who could uncover new rest legislations four months before the iowa caucus. >> i have said repeatedly that i will answer questions before the house committee. >> there is a dispute over which questions. her lawyer is a veteran of the

lewinsky scandal wants to limit it to benghazi and lock in october 22 as the only appearance to finish this before 2016 but he will not agree because the state department has been slow to turn over e-mails and republicans worry a key document could be held back of the the committee added that while hillary clinton wants only benghazi questions her e-mail arrangement clearly falls in the scope of the select committee jurisdiction. that arrangement came under fire after two inspectors general found hillary clinton sent at least four e-mails with classified information despite this promise. >> there is no classified material. >> in fairness to hillary clinton the e-mails did not contain classifications markings so investigators believe her server may contain hundreds more classified e-mails. the aides pounded on "new york times" dialing back on the original report suggesting that it is now a criminal matter, republicans noted the improper handling of classified information can lead to charges.

this week, the state department is slated to release more of her e-mails in response to a court order which could lady to more revelations. especially if the intelligence community blocked the release of some of the mails to prevent the leak of more classified information. >> thanks for that. >> joining us is one of her toughest critics republican president 58 can detail carly fiorina and jess mcintosh vice president of emily's list who help vote for liberals on abortions. let's start with security referral by two inspectors general to the f.b.i. do you think that hillary clinton broke the law? >> it is clear she broke the rules. it is crystal clear she broke the rules and it is crystal clear she has been engaged in a coverup of a last things, benghazi the fact that she broke the rules. how amazing she has had the server and decided to wipe it

clean. >> ms. mcto be -- mcintosh that said to the referral to the f.b.i. there was classified information being transmitted classified information at that time not subsequently, and that it is still classified, and that this is information that never should have witness transmitted to private e-mail. >> questions have been asked and answered for months. she said repeatedly that show is looking forward to testifying before the economy and she intends to do that. she is very smartly kept her presidential campaign focused on the live of every day persons and what she wants to do for them as president. that is where voters want her to be. that is the kind of debate they want to have with their

candidates. she is doing the right thing by keeping it this. >> is this information about private e-mails and mishandling of classified information is it irrelevant? >> it is relevant at the center of what voters care about they care about whether a potential president is trustworthy and what voters are discovering day after day drip by drip, is hillary clinton is not trustworthy. it is the heart of the matter. she is not trustworthy. she has engaged in coverups. she has not been truthful. each day that goes by we learn that over and over and over and no amount of spin and no amount of talking points is going to change that reality. >> ms mcintosh voters saying they do nut find hillary clinton honest and trustworthy. >> of course, she is leading all

of her republican rivals. >> wait, wait, wait, that is not true she is trailing in three key states. >> there are discrepancies with how many republicans they sampled. the point is voters have been excited about her message to make the economy work better. >> for give me and i do want to keep this fair and balanced you are not answering what abut the honesty and trustworthiness? >> she has a long campaign to talk to vote are as bout who she is what she wants to do for voters and we will see the numbers change and we are seeing voters still very interested in what she is going to do for them as president despite the numbers. there is a little bit of strangeness there. she is going to keep the conversation going and it is going quite well for her so far. >> let's turn to the undercover votes that antiabortion activists is released in the last quorum of weeks. here is what two planned

parenthood officials said in the undercover votes about altering abortions in order to be able to retrieve fetal tissue. here it is. [ indiscernible ]. [ inaudible ] >> this technique crushing above and below specific organize agains to be used for fetal republic, what is wrong with that? >> my gosh, by the way this has nothing to do with whether you are pro choice or pro life it has to do with the moral foundation of our nation. if a woman was sitting outside of planned parenthood in her ob/gyn office along at the ultrasound at that point in her pregnancy her doctor would be

saying to her look at your baby look at its heartbeat look at its fingers and toes this is an anomination that planned parenthood has lobbied against a woman's opportunity to look at an ultrasound before she makes an incredibly difficult choice to end the unborn life in her and yet they are using that same technology to harvest body parts which they claim are not a life in order to sell them to save another life. it is unbelievably hypocritical and i find it astounding that anyone can defend it. >> ms mcintosh one aspect of this the law on this is clear and we will put i on the screen, no alteration of the timing, method or procedures used to terminate the pregnancy was made solely for the purposes of obtaining the tissue." that is the law. here is what an official says.

>> if our usual technique is... [ inaudible ] switch to using less suction, it would come out as intact. then we are kind of violating the protocol that says to the patients >> ms mcintosh that will set said she will ask the surgeon at this planned parenthood facility about violating the protocol about switching procedures in order to get better parts. isn't that a direct violation of the federal law? >> after hours of talking to this staffer in this dishonestly edited video they got her to say she would talk to a doctor. that is not an admission of a crime. listening to this language is ugly and uncomfortable and i completely understand that. the concept of organ donation is a real difficult thing to think about but the facts that benefit

from this life saving medical research are immensely grateful for the kindness of parents who donate. we are talking about people with loved ones with alzheimer's disease and perform disease and this tissue donation was used to make the rabies vaccine and chicken pox vaccine and polio vaccine and relates to america's health. >> miss fiorina that is a point that defenders make, fetal research has been useful in testing and finding cure for diseases and the national institutes of health spent $76 million on research on fetal tissue so you may not lick the bay it is happening but don't these tissues and organs go for a good cause? >> let's start with her comment about a heavily edited video. i find it fascinating that planned parenthood and employ's

list and the pro abortion lobby are concerned about an edited video. i don't thing they have been concerned about an edited video of mount snowden or mitt romney. rather than going out people that put out this video information we need to sees talk about the issue. they are change to change the subject and say this is life saving research. i just find it amazing that this group of pro abortion lobbyists continue to say they are protecting women's health. really? late term abortion is demonstrably bad for women's health? they continue to lebanon against parent am notification? really? it is protecting a teach rager's health that she can go do a tanning salon or get a tattoo without her mother's permission but she can get an abortion without her mother's permission? this is not about someone else's

health but a woman's health, a woman's opportunity to have all the choices in front of her and it is about a high of that she is carrying. i am pro life as you know but there are plenty of pro choice well who are horrified by this as they should be. by the way after hours honestly the fact these forbes can sit here swirling their wine drinking their salad laughing over getting a lamborghini and talking about specimens in featural tissue i find horrifying as do many americans. >> there are two issues here specifically whether you are in favor or not of abortion, one is the changing of a roar and in fact the procedure has to be altered in order to get the feet am body parts. it is the question of price. selling fetal tissue for profit. here is undercover video of a

planted parenthood official seeping to be haggling over price. here she is. >> what would make you happy? what would work for you? in the dark aims... [ inaudible ] who throws out the figure first is at a loss. if it's still low you canan >> she is haggling over the price. >> incredibly tasteless joke. absolutely. >> wait, wait, wait, it was more than joke, she said when talking of the price saying the first person to offer always ended up at the low end. the law is, they are allowed to recover costs. cost is cost. if it is $100 it is $100 but she is talking about something more than cost. >> she also said in the same video it was so long since she had a conversation where someone wanted to suspension that she

did not know what cost was. talking about the deceptively edited video matters when they take owe continue times where the staffer colorly said, they would not be able to sell this because it violates the law and they will not do that. >> that was the other staffer. >> it was correct. republicans risk ail help eighting folks they are not thinking about alienating when they talk about the abortion debate the way miss fiorino does. 65 percent of the women who get abars are moms already. and the decision when to have a chide is the most permit economic decision that most american families will ever face. i don't believe that politicians should be involved in making that choice for them. >> for ever-'s sake, door governor heavy were's sake politicians are involved >> the tie. ly's list a pro abortion

lobbying organization is involved in politic every day and cop sift. ly emily's list is lobbying for pro abortion candidates. this is no justification anymore for federal funding of planted parenthood. >> wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. ladies? ladies? ladies? let me ask the question, because this is the last thing we will have time to talk about the issue of federal funding because miss fiorino you have called to an end of federal funding half a billion a year that goes to mapped paver hood it is the single largest provider of abortions 327,000 in 2013 but it performed 487,000 breast exams and 704,000 h.i.v. tests and hisly said it is a matter of women's health. >> i am hoping that this situation will not further

undermine the very important services planned parenthood provide. >> let me pick up on that, mississippi -- miss any rope. if you defund won't you loose breast exams and h.i.v. tests? >> i thought obamacare was going do take care that. i am tired of the red hearing -- red herring of women's health. with not accept federal funding of pregnancy setters next to the clinics so women can look at the ultrasound before they have an abortion or to have options presented to them they choose to bring life to the world. planted parenthood does not want them. this is not about women's health

but printed parenthood wanting to preserve their political power so they can lobby consist. ly on behalf of pro abortion democrats. why should they be given federal funding? why should she get federal funding to continue to lebanon for certain candidates? as employ's list does every system day? >> miss fiorina and ms mcintosh thank you for join us. >> rand paul looks to revive his campaign ahead the first g.o.p. debate. we will ask how he manns to do that weapon we come we -- when we come back. yeeeeeah! new ensure active high protein. 16 grams of protein and 23 vitamins and minerals. ensure. take life in.

♪ every auto insurance policy has a number. but not every insurance company understands the life behind it. those who have served our nation. have earned the very best service in return. ♪ usaa. we know what it means to serve. get an auto insurance quote and see why 92% of our members plan to stay for life.

>> a look outside at the new jersey festival of ballooning and now back to the race for the white house 11 days' the fox news facebook first presidential debate on august 6 in cleveland. kentucky senator rand paul will certainly be on the stage as one of the top ten candidates in the national presidents. senator paul welcome back to fox news sunday. >> thanks for having me, chris. >> i want start with a couple of subjects we discussed in the previous segment. do you believe that hillary clinton broke the law in handling the classified information on her private e-mail? what if the justice department decides fought to investigate? >> it is pretty damning that remember's justice department has brought this up. the fact that they are saying they are concerned the classified information was transferred, but people have to understand how man things are classified. even her daily schedule is classified to recollect her and

to protect the people what protect her. what if she e-mailed the ambassador in benghazi but why think she communicated with him but if she tipped people off to his whereabouts an e-mail would be very sensitive if not classified. so that is why we have a rule and why she knew there was a rule they actually admonished an ambassador because he wasn't using the proper server. i don't understand how she can skate by and act as if she really wasn't aware of the law. >> let me ask you also, about the planned parenthood video after they were released. you offered an amendment to the highway funding bill to de-fund planted parenthood but the senate majority leader mcconnell will not offer a vote. >> i submitted a discharge petition this is highly unusual for a non-leadership position to submit a discharge position but this means i will try to first a

vote on this. the time is now to discuss whether taxpayer dollars should be going to such a gruesome procedure. the doctor on video if a casual voice while sipping wine and eating brie talks about rotate the baby an to get better access to baby parts she will "harvest," for sale to researchers. i really think the time has come to debate do people want their taxpayers dollar going to this kind of procedure? >> what happened if it look like you are not going to get a vote on the senate floor? >> necessity may block me today on a vote on an amendment to the highway bill but i am file cloture or trying to file for a discharm position to have a separate bill f i have 16 snarls to sign a -- senators to sign a bill we should de-fund planted parenthood people will be outraged and call their senators and say have you signed the discharge position in they will

want a vote on defunding planted parenthood. i think even pro choice people are horrified by presbyterian part of the baby and not crushing the brain so we can harvest the police officer. -- the liver. people are outrage asked they citizen a vote. >> senator turning to the state of your campaign. back in december of 2013, you were running second in the polls with 17 percent. last november you were first in the polls with 11.8 percent but in the latest poll you are in 7th with 5.6 percent support. question: why has your campaign lost momentum, sir? >> i a not so sure we have. have are a last positives throughout and some of the polls we fine interesting when you poll me head to head with hillary clinton we actually beat hillary clinton in five states won by prove. we lead her in pennsylvania that

has not been won by a sent since 1988 so this is what i have been saying. i am a different republican, a republican who can win independent votes and in all five of those states we beat hillary clinton by 10 points among independents. that is how you win. we have to convince enough republicans this is a winning message. i can win the purple states. that is what the early polling shows. >> this is also a sense in terms of your diminished status in the republican primary polls that the world has changed on you. you were running strong in the polls a couple of years ago even a year ago and your positions on limits to foreign intervention hims to domestic surveillance were popular but new with isis on the march and with increased domestic terrorism at home, there is a concern that maybe you are not tough enough open those issues. >> the interesting thing is we poll these issued and we ask these questions of voters all

the time. a poll in iowa they asked do you thing we should be more involved in foreign warlike john mccain who wants to be everywhere all the time? or be less involved or more judicious and only go to war when we have a health to an american interest or vital american interest and it polls equally in iowa is same in new hampshire and never. i want to defend america and i will township against terrorist. i would do more than others on steam because they are distracting ourselves from the real terrorist throat by cleaning so much information we get inundied by the information and we are distracted. i want to collect more information on terrorists but i want to do it according to the the way the fourth amendment should was put forward there should be a warrant with a judge's name. >> fox news as you know and facebook are teaming together to put on the first republic

presidential debate august 6 in cleveland. we are asking you the viewers to submit questions either written or votes that we will ask candidates on the stage. facebook tells us that the top three issues among people who talk about you are taxes intelligence-gathering and privacy, and homeland security security. here is a commend from john any anderson who writes "senator rand paul is work overtime to protect homegrown terrorists, americans are dying." senator, how do you answer johnny? >> it is kind of a missed thatting of situation. the anding thing is we have had another terrorist shooting in chattanooga tennessee a boston bomb and the major at fort hood under the bulk collection of data that rebound is doing which has been recalled illegal by the courts and contravenes the fourth amendment. we have been having the

terrorist attack despite the collection of the information much the interesting thing when lube at it maybe we are being distracted by too much information. it is put this way: good decision making isn't about knowledge or data but it is about understanding the data. i want to collect more information about terrorists but i don't want to indiscriminately collect all american'sness. even the government admits we are not catching terrorist with the bulk collection of data. congress now is say we should not do it much the court say we should that do it and it goes against every sense of what the founding fathers put in the fourth amendment. my position on privacy is very popular. people under 40, 83 percent of people under 40 think the government should not be collecting director phone reports all time. >> senator you put out a video this week that shows you destroy the i.r.s. tax code and at times you set it open fire and feed it

into a wood chipper and you use a chainsaw. the question i have because it seems to be a stunt is this an effort to take the spotlight away from donald trump who seems to be soaking up all of the media attention? >> i have three teenage sons and the teenage sons don't watch the news channels but they pass things around from friend to friend and what you find is if you have something interesting or people think it is cheffer or newspaper any it is passed around from teen to teen and that is why i am trying to put things out that sties will get into the hands of youth who are not watching the traditional news. >> senator one of your big issues in this campaign and we have been talking about it more than the other republican candidates is trying to grow the party campaigning in inner cities and reaching out to minorities do you worry that trump's comments about illegal immigrants coming over the next

can border is going to hurt that effort and alienate the kind of voters you are trying to attract? >> every candidate will have to do what they went to do. my concern is i want to reach out to new people and go places that though republican has been going. i have been to detroit. to ferguson. to the south side of chicago and philadelphia at a boy's latin school in inner city. the historic black colleges. i will keep doing that. i think of immigration, you have to have a secure border but i don't automatically thing high goodness all immigrants are bad people. the opposite, my great grandfather came from germany and most come seeking the american dream and i will not vilify all democrats with a birthday -- brad brash. there are some bad people and i put if legislation to make sure the sanctuary cities doesn't

happen again but by and large the people who come to our country want the american dream. >> senator paul, thank you. thanks for coming in. we will see you most likely at first debate. >> our sunday group joins the conscious about hillary clinton's potential legal problems and donald trump's threat. at ally bank no branches equals great rates. it's a fact. kind of like shopping hungry equals overshopping. people with type 2 diabetes come from all walks of life. if you have high blood sugar ask your doctor about farxiga. it's a different kind of medicine that works by removing some sugar from your body. along with diet and exercise farxiga helps lower blood sugar

in adults with type 2 diabetes. with one pill a day, farxiga helps lower your a1c. and, although it's not a weight-loss or blood-pressure drug farxiga may help you lose weight and may even lower blood pressure when used with certain diabetes medicines. do not take if allergic to farxiga or its ingredients. symptoms of a serious allergic reaction include rash, swelling, or difficulty breathing or swallowing. if you have any of these symptoms stop taking farxiga and seek medical help right away. do not take farxiga if you have severe kidney problems, are on dialysis, or have bladder cancer. tell your doctor right away if you have blood or red color in your urine or pain while you urinate. farxiga can cause serious side effects including dehydration, genital yeast infections in women and men, low blood sugar, kidney problems, and increased bad cholesterol. common side effects include urinary tract infections changes in urination and runny nose. ♪do the walk of life♪ ♪yeah, you do the walk of life♪

need to lower your blood sugar? ask your doctor about farxiga. and visit our website to learn how you may be able to get every month free. ♪ every auto insurance policy has a number. but not every insurance company understands the life behind it. those who have served our nation. have earned the very best service in return. ♪ usaa. we know what it means to serve. get an auto insurance quote and see why 92% of our members plan to stay for life. i already feel like we're the most connected but i think this solo date will seal the deal. sure! i offer multi-car, safe driver, and so many other discounts that people think i'm a big deal. and boy, are they right. ladies, i can share hundreds in savings with all of you! just visit progressive.com today. but right now, it's choosing time.

test test test test test. test test test test. test test test test. at ally bank no branches equals great rates. it's a fact. kind of like mute buttons equal danger. ...that sound good? not being on this phone call sounds good. it's not muted. was that you jason? it was geoffrey! it was jason. it could've been brenda. i'm certainly well aware of the classification requirements and >> i am well aware of the classification requirements and did not send classified material. >> we all have a responsibility to get this right. >> hillary clinton in march and again on friday defending her use of a personal e-mail server as she now faces the possibility of an f.b.i. investigation. it is time now for sunday group brit hume, and sheryl gay

stolberg of "new york times", and syndicated columnist george will and fox news political analyst juan williams. this was a lot of bad news for the clinton campaign this week as we saw the referral by two inspectors general to the f.b.i. of the handling of classified e-mails, classified information in the private e-mails and also some polls. we will put they will on the scene. in the swing states of colorado and iowa and virginia, showing her trailing marco rubio jeb bush and scott walker in all three states. and in those states the numbers have dropped on the question of whether she is honest and trustworthy. brit? how serious? >> i was stunned by the polls. i did not believe she had fallen that far in the eyes of voters in states where she would be expected to get a decent reception it is striking.

this e-mail controversy feeds that. the news the inspectors general look at 40, 40, 40 out of thousands, found ten instances -- four instances, 10 percent in she classified material they said was classified at the time the e-mails were written and sent that to me goes to the question what she is as i think he is proving herself to be, a liar. she said there is no classified information in the e-mails. on a small sample they found 10 percent to have classified information. whether this job will ever do anything about it is highly dubious. it does feed the public perception. >> how big a deal for clinton? you have two inspector generals, independent, outside the

bureaucracy intelligence community saying this was classified information classified at the time that was being sent and some was being sent by hillary clinton and referring this to the f.b.i., how big a deal? do you think it is big enough it could nudge someone also like joe biden or elizabeth warren? >> look, intentionally release ing classified information is a big trail general petraeus was sentenced to probation for doing it. whether hillary clinton did it, she said she does not release classified material and investigators will have to determine if she did. as brit said, this goes to a narrative of her campaign. questions that voters have. is she trustworthy? is she one of us? the very existence of a private mail server has raised questions in the mines of many americans most ordinary americans do not have a private mail server at home and they expect hair government officials to be using

government e-mail serveers. it is striking we are still talking about this story five months after "new york times" broke the initial story about this private mail server these are the questions that will percolate lowther campaign. whether it will nudge gentleman biden in or anyone else is hard to say but she will have to continue to address the questions. we know she testify or she said she will in october so this is not going away. >> i want to switch to the other big mill story this week involving donald trump would has raised the possible, a threat, if he doesn't feel he is being treated fairly by the republican national committee he could run as an independent third party candidate. george look, bag at ross perot who got 19 percent i know george h.w. bush campaign felt he was the difference between winning and losing what is the

possibility if he decided to run as an independent he hands the presidency over to the democrats? thank you is a real possibility. my wife works for his target of the day which is scott walker. that said, you put your finger on the successful third party candidates have two things in monday. they are unsuccess will, they don't win but they have a strong base such as strom thurmond this is a marathon and not a vicinity and it is a long-term before the first votes cast before mr. trump could lose and he would look like a sore loser. this is going to be some information that gets out all everything about his manners or lack thereof they find he is not just unkeith but unprincipled he was pro choice, very pr. on choice and he gave money to

hillary clinton chuck schumer harry reid, nancy pelosi because he obviously wanted a democratic congress and they will want to think about that. other issues, the worse supreme court decision of the century which expanded the power of people like donald trump using government to take away private property. he supports that. we will see how people like that. >> trump went to the border mexico the southern border on texas this week to talk about illegal immigration and he get a tough reception from reporters. >> have you seen any evidence here to confirm your fears about mexico sending their will whys across the boarder? >> i have her it from a lot of people. >> what evidence? >> we will show you the evidence. >> when? we will show the evidence at some point. >> what do you maybe of that, juan, or the threat to run as an

independent? >> that was the budget news of the week of the to he runs as an independent it remind me of ralph nader in 2,000 and most democrats think he cost al gore the presidency. i don't think there is any question that judicial makes a point here, he does not have a regional bait but a national debate. iment after last week's event where he was unfairly critical of senator john mccain he would cave but according to what we have seen, very sketchy polls, he has not he is in the race and in some cases leading so he is still around. one of the most ridiculous thing is he has the spanish vote, univision has im70 percent to 20 percent versus hillary clinton but he is damaging the respect brand that is what going on, a pew poll indicates the republican favourability rating has gone down the first six months of the year and that is

directly tied in to the kind of extremism that you are seeing from donald trump and impact on minute is swing voters. >> he seems to be trying to contract party in some respects. >> secretary of state john kerry goes to capitol hill to try to sale the nuclear deal with iran. the reaction? not so good.

when i started at the shelter, i noticed benny right away. i just had to adopt him. he's older so he needs my help all day. when my back pain flared up we both felt it i took tylenol at first but i had to take 6 pills to get through the day. then my friend said "try aleve". just two pills, all day. and now, i'm back for my best bud! aleve. all day strong and try aleve pm now with an easy open cap.

not unlike a hotel guest that leaves only who >> not unlike a hotel guest that leaves only with a hotel bathroom open his back i believe you have been fleeced. >> we settled out to stop their

ability to build nuclear weapon and we achieved that. >> that is a taste of treatment that secretary of state john kerry got in the first hearing on the nuclear deal with iran. we are back, now, with a panel. we knew that inares would oppose this tell. do you get any sense then, that the president and his team could be losing some support among congressional democrats who will decide if the deal goes through? >> there are a lot of congressional democrats opposed. the question, really, though, is does that mean the president will be unable to hold 34 senators and/or a third plus one of the house of representatives? >> he only has to sustain the detail. >> it will be damaging to him and to the attitude that the people have about this agreement if it isn't approached. it will not be approved, it will likely be disapproved but not enough to withstand a veto so

the president gets the agreement that lasts on paper until the end of his term and that is it. but it will be a big daily for him and he will claim a victory. i am not sure it is a victory for everyone. >> there are a number of issues that the credit ebbs have with the deal, the inspections regime and the fact that the arms embargo is lifted starting in five years. the fact that while we limit it, their bake nuclear infrastructure remains intact through this deal. what do you see as the biggest problem in trying, of those or other issues in terms of trying to get it through congress the next few months. >> the biggest sticking point it is not a permanent fix and going in ten years over time from 10-15 years iran will be able to enrich uranium again. that sub-- is number one. and members of congress have concern over a 24-day wait

period for the insomethings to take place. and this are conditions money will flow to bad actors. once sacks are lifted and money flows into iran, kill flow into the cud force. one person -- the kurd person. one person to watch is the senator from new york, in line to become the democratic leader after harry reid steps down. this week in new york there were 10,000 protesters in times square demanding that chuck schumer vote against the deal and he is usually outspoken and talkative and he is officially quiet right now and the aides said he has not made a decision. >> what do you think schumer will do? >> i have no idea the i tries to find out yesterday and the 18 was, he is still thing about it. >> would you agree he goes against it, it could think the

deal? >> schumer is in a value difficult bind. he is supposed to be someone who is carrying president obama's water on capitol hill and there is one democrat openly there's one democrat openly against it and that's bob bob menendez. >> george? >> he will vote g.p.s. it but only if the vote is not needs and if the vote is knee he will vote for it the we see this with moderate democrats they vote for the affordable health care act. it is all the same. the question to me is, how many democrats nations saying congress's opinion is interesting. those who hold to the constitutional oath understand this should have been a treaty anyway should vote against this on procedural

grounds. >> another issue is the fierce ra opposition to the deal from israel and there was an interesting development on that front this week. jonathan pollard, not directly related to this but you'll see in a moment bear with me, u.s. officials say they're preparing to release pollard who spied for israel and gave them u.s. secrets that they may release him even before possibly his mandatory 30-year parole consideration comes up. he's been in prison for just ab about -- in november it will be 30 years. the thought is although administration flatly denies it, t juan, this may be a way to get israel to be less opposed to the deal.de what do you make of all this? >> this is a real spy. he stole classified information. stole it and then he pled guilty to it and of course the -- >> and sold it. >> so what you have here is a

real bad actor. from president reagan through president clinton through the second president bush and first president bush, everybody said no to this because you can't allow that to happen as an example to the rest of the intelligence community. a a nonetheless, i think this would be a conciliatory gesture. it would be a consolation in some sense to netanyahu and to israel. would it be effective? i don't know. remember, he's eligible for parole in november. i think what happened this week is they floated it as a kind of, you know, is this a possibility and what would america say and what would israel say? it doesn't look like it's getting great acclimation from anybody. i think for israel they would like to see their guy out of jail. >> do you think that's enough to get israel and netanyahu to soften their criticism of the iran deal? >> on the iran deal absolutely not. conceivable it would have softening effect on the tensions between the united states and he

israel that relate to a range of issues but not on the iran deal. israel believes it's a threat to i the very existence. they won't change that view because some long sought spy of theirs gets out of the pokey. >> you don't hear the word pokey very often. sheryl, the white house flatly p denies that there's any linkage between release of pollard and trying to smooth things over with israel. o the fact is if the white house goes ahead with it and they were leaking the possibility heavily this week, they would be going very much over the very strong objections of the cia, the fbi, other agencies who feel this is a guy who spied and stole secrets, sold secrets to israel, was a civilian analyst but was working along with the navy, military secrets, your thoughts about that and also the impact it would have on israel? >> frankly to little effect.

relations between barack obama and netanyahu are so sour it's not going to cure that.e israel does view iran and this deal as a threat. >> thank you, panel. see you next sunday. up next, our power player of the week. how one of the biggest names in hotels is appealing to the next generation of travelers. i brought in some protein to get us moving. i'm new ensure active high protein. i help you recharge with nutritious energy and strength. i'll take that. yeeeeeah! new ensure active high protein. 16 grams of protein and 23 vitamins and minerals. ensure. take life in. hi my name is tom. i'm raph. my name is anne. i'm one of the real live attorneys you can talk to through legalzoom. don't let unanswered legal questions hold you up, because we're here we're here and we've got your back. legalzoom. legal help is here. vo: today's the day. more and more people with type 2 diabetes are learning about long-acting levemir®.

as my diabetes changed it got harder to control my blood sugar. today, i'm asking about levemir®. vo: levemir® is an injectable insulin that can give you blood sugar control for up to 24 hours. and levemir® helps lower your a1c. levemir® lasts 42 days without refrigeration. that's 50% longer than lantus® which lasts 28 days. levemir® comes in flextouch® the latest in insulin pen technology from novo nordisk. levemir® is a long-acting insulin used to control high blood sugar in adults and children with diabetes and is not recommended to treat diabetic ketoacidosis. do not use levemir® if you are allergic to any of its ingredients. the most common side effect is low blood sugar which may cause symptoms such as sweating, shakiness, confusion, and headache. severe low blood sugar can be serious and life-threatening. ask your doctor about alcohol use, operating machinery, or driving. other possible side effects include injection site reactions. tell your doctor about all medicines you take and all of your medical conditions.

check your blood sugar. your insulin dose should not be changed without asking your doctor. get medical help right away if you have trouble breathing, sweating, extreme drowsiness swelling of your face, tongue, or throat, dizziness, or confusion. today's the day to ask about levemir® flextouch®. covered by most health insurance and medicare plans. his name his name has been one of america's best brands for more than half a century. as we told you last november, now he's trying to tailor that brand for the next generation. here's our power player of the week.

>> before you walk through the lobby, you checked in and went to your room and never came back to the lobby unless you were on the way out of the hotel. today the lobby is a gathering place. that's totally different. >> bill marriott is talking about millennials. folks in their 20s and early 30s and what they want in hotels. while marriott has been in the business 60 years -- >> i traveled 110,000 miles last year. >> at age 83, he's all about the future. how much of your focus is on the millennials? >> right now about 45% to 50% of our business. in another three to four years it will be 60% of our business. >> we got talking about a portfolio project in new york city that we have going on. >> marriott has an innovation lab where staffers brainstorm and talk with millennials and even have mockups of potential hotel rooms. edgy, not much color, big beds and big tvs. but often no desk since they're

on their laptops. this is the shower? >> almost right in the guest room. >> it's bare bones. you have a bed, a shower, a sink. and a big tv. you can tell marriott is having to adjust to some of it. >> we were not exactly cool with flowered bedspreads. now there's no bedspreads. there's a cover over the sheet and blankets but no real bedspread. >> does that scare you >> no. it's the right thing to do. this is what customers want. >> that could be the motto for marriott's success. bill's dad started with a root beer stand in 1927. >> he opened on the same day lindbergh flew the atlantic. he met lindbergh once. he said we went in business on the same day. you got all of the publicity. >> now marriott has 19 brands. more than 4,000 hotels. 720,000 rooms and a lot of guests.

>> probably over a million people a night. >> how does that make you feel? >> concerned that they are being well taken care of. >> three years ago marriott stepped down as chairman and ceo. you haven't exactly retired though, have you? >> i don't think i will until they carry me out feet first. i average 40 to 50 hours a week. >> why do you keep doing it? >> i love it. >> when we asked what the satisfaction of the job is, marriott surprised us. he talked about 360,000 employees. >> 50% of our general managers in our hotels have been with the company 25 years or more and have started out as hourly workers and that to me is terrific. when we bring someone in as a waiter and make them president of the company, that's just the way america is supposed to work. >> even though he's moved upstairs in the company, bill marriott visits about 200 of his hotels each year. he shows no signs of slowing down. and that's it for today. have a great week.

we'll see you back next "fox news sunday." you back fox news sunday. this is "the fox reporter." good evening everyone. i'm julie banderas. high stakes and high drama in a rare sun session on capitol hill. the senate gaveling in this afternoon to vote on several amendments to the federal highway bill. lawmakers face a july 31st deadline to approve a plan to replenish the highway trust fund. it has been running on deficit for years, and if things don't change washington could actually be forced to cutback on payments to states for vital infrastructure projects. now just a short time ago lawmakers defeated an amendment to repeal obamacare and