tv This Week With George Stephanopoulos ABC July 1, 2018 8:00am-9:01am PDT
>> announcer: "this week" with george stephanopoulos starts right now. high stakes for the high court. >> we're going to pick ourselves one great united states supreme court justice. >> president trump hoping to solidify a conservative majority with his second supreme court selection. >> one that's going to be there for 40 years, 45 years. >> landmark cases like roe v. wade could hang in the balance. democrats face an uphill battle to block trump's nominee but with a mere one vote majority in the senate, can republicans stay united? we'll talk with republican senator susan collins whose support for abortion rights makes her a critical swing vote. >> i always look for judges who
respect precedent. sglfrj and a key democrat on the senate judiciary committee, amy klobuchar, joins us live. plus, america divided. we travelled almost 1500 miles from virginia -- >> i voted for trump. >> how do you think he's done as president? >> i think he's done very well. >> to texas. >> disheartening, discouraging. >> what do voters really think about the president? can a polarized nation come together? we take the pulse of america. plus insights and analysis from our powerhouse roundtable, from the white house to your house, the facts that matter this week. good morning, and thanks for joining us this july 4th holiday week. what a week in american politics. it began with a president in retreat after trump changed course by ending his administration's widely criticized practice of separating families at the border.
we'll talk more about that and yesterday's nationwide protests in a moment, but this morning, the president is preparing to change the course of history as he considers his replacement for retiring supreme court justice anthony kennedy. an opportunity to reshape the court for a generation. as "time" magazine put it, it's trump's court now. the impact of the court was on full display this week, most notably in the 5-4 decision to uphold the president's travel ban. kennedy was in the majority in that and several other highly consequential decisions. his replacement on the supreme court will likely solidify a conservative majority. for trump supporters, it's a dream come true. for his opponents, it's a nightmare. we saw that firsthand as we traveled through the country this week, talking to voters on both sides of the aisle. the latest dividing line in american politics will likely galvanize members of both
parties to head to the polls in november, but until then, president trump isn't wasting any time, moving forward to quickly select justice kennedy's replacement. for the latest on the search, let's bring in terry moran who covers the supreme court for abc news. good morning, terry. the president says he'll nominate justice kennedy's replacement a week from tomorrow. what do we know about how he's narrowing that down? >> well, he says he's got six or seven candidates that he's looking at. first he said five. he might add a couple. he's interviewing them over the next several days. this is a process he knows. he went through it with neil gorsuch, and that he seems to like. he's looking for what he says are sterling credentials, that means harvard and yale who are already pretty well represented on the court. the president is looking for reliable conservative but also the personal quality like other presidents. what he wants is somebody that as people who are in the process
say somebody who's not weak, somebody who's tough. he wants to make sure that his pick will be able to stand up to pressure. >> you know, we think of justice kennedy as the swing vote on the court, but on many issues he certainly sided with the conservatives, the travel ban, so this is really about social issues if the court really moves to the right. >> that's where it will be most noticeable. abortion for sure is up for grabs and targeted by conservatives. the place of religion in public life and relation to secular law. we'll see more cases like that, the baker who didn't want to bake the wedding cake. but there were other cases. it wasn't just on social issues. on criminal law and prison reform kennedy was unpredicta e unpredictable. he wrote the opinion holding that foreign terrorist suspects in guantanamo bay with a constitutional right to make a case in american court. so he had a big impact across the law and more than anything it was his approach. he was a case-by-case judge. these days it's much more idealogical.
>> we've seen republicans nominate justices for the supreme court in the past they thought were conservative, john paul stevens, david souter, but you think that's not going to happen this time? >> no, those days are gone. the conservatives of the past 20, 30 years in part because of that have developed a kind of farm team system. they groomed candidates for judges and those candidates themselves, people who want to make an impact in the world that way, they see what happened to robert bork. they see what happened to other idealogical judges. so they keep their heads down. it's about methodology, it's about participating in those networks where conservatives know that if they come to be nominated, they're reliable. >> okay, the vote is going to come down to a handful of modern senators on both sides of the aisle, the left and the right, including republican senator susan collins who we're speaking to in a moment. what do you think the president is doing to secure their votes? >> so he's taking a kind of good
cop bad cop approach and he's both cops. he is trying on one hand at his rallies and on twitter, he's calling out these crucial votes. the democrats in red states, senator heidi heitkamp when he was in north dakota, her state, he called her out. then he turned around two days later and had a nice cozy meeting in the white house with the democrats and these crucial republican pro-choice women, lisa murkowski and susan collins of maine who you're going to be talking to. there's so much pressure on them. you can see it in the headlines out there. their loyalties will be tested in many, many directions. so this is a process in which the president is getting personally involved in. he seems to enjoy it and no question he's in charge of this and trying to already get those crucial votes on both sides of the aisle in his corral. >> thanks so much, terry. really look forward to your coverage. >> you bet. and joining me now is senator susan collins of maine. senator, i want to start with your meeting with president
trump. you along with five other key senators met with him thursday to talk about the supreme court vacancy. we know the interview process with potential nominees is about to get under way. what did you tell the president you were looking for in a nominee? >> i told him that i was looking for a nominee that would demonstrate a respect for precedent, a long-standing and vital tenent of our judicial system. i also suggested he broaden the search beyond the list of 25 nominees. the white house council told me that there have been a few additional potential nominees added to that list, but i think the president should not feel bound by that list and instead should seek out recommendations to ensure that he gets the best ssible person.
>> did you get the sense he is bound by that list and is there anything that the president said to you that concerns you? >> well, i don't want to get into the details of what was a private discussion. i was glad to hear that the list had been broadened somewhat, that five additional people had been added to it, and that the president was listening to the five of us who had been asked to come to the white house and talk with him about what qualities that we would seek. obviously i mentioned judicial temperament, integrity, intellect, experience, qualifications, fidelity to the rule of law and the constitution, but most important of all, respect for precedent. >> and i know you don't want to divulge any private conversations but what sense did you get from the president about the kind of nominee he's looking for?
>> the president listened very intently to what lisa murkowski and i said, and i got the feeling that he was still deliberating and had not yet reached a decision and that this was genuine outreach on his part. >> you know, you talk about that list of 25. that list was made public and i know you said you wanted the list expanded. the president has said he's going to talk to six or seven people, but was there anybody on that list of those 25 that you outright objected to? >> there are people on that list whom i could not support because i believe that they have demonstrated a disrespect for the vital principle of sorry
decises which has chief roberts has said is a fundamental has said is a fundamental principle of our judicial system that promotes even-handedness and stability. i'm not going to go into which ones those are but there are people on that list whom i could not vote for. >> do you believe the confirmation has to take place before the mid-terms? you've heard democrats talk about the mcconnell role when president obama wanted his nominee to have a confirmation hearing in 2016. does this have to take place, in your view, before the mid-terms? >> well first let me say that i strongly disagreed with leader mcconnell's decision to not proceed with a vote on president obama's nominee, merit garland. i thought that was wrong and i said so publicly. when i look at the average amount of time between the
nominee being sent to us and when there is a vote on the nominee, it's 67 days. so we've just entered july. that would bring us into september, and that would allow a nominee to be confirmed before the supreme court reconvenes in early october. so i don't think that's an unreasonable goal. this is not a case where a nominee is being put forth right before a presidential election and right now i see no reason why we can't meet the deadline of getting someone on the court so that the court will be at full strength by october -- the october convening. >> you know, you voted last year to confirm justice gorsuch to replace justice scalia, but that really didn't alter the
idealogical balance of the court. that really could happen this time, especially for the future of cases like roe v. wade. you talked about precedent. you support abortion rights. what will you do to ensure that remains in place with the nominee? >> i'm going to have an in-depth discussion with the nominee and i believe very much that roe v. wade is settled law as it has been described by chief justice roberts. it has been established as a constitutional right for 46 years -- 45 years, and was reaffirmed 26 years ago. so a nominee's position on whether or not they respect precedent will tell me a lot about whether or not they would overturn roe v. wade. a candidate for this important
position who would overturn roe v. wade would not be acceptable to me because that would indicate an activist agenda that i don't want to see a judge have. and that would indicate to me a failure to respect precedent, a fundamental tenent of our judicial system. >> i want to play something president trump said from the 2016 -- the final presidential debate about roe v. wade. let's listen. >> do you want to see the court overturn roe v. wade? >> well, if we put another two or perhaps three justices on, that's really what's going to be -- that's what will happen, and that will happen automatically in my opinion because i am putting pro-life justices on the court. >> the president was of course very explicit there, but this week on fox he seemed to change his tune. let's listen. >> are you going to ask your nominees beforehand how they
might vote on roe v. wade? >> that's a big one and probably not. they're all saying don't do that, you don't do that, you shouldn't do that, but i'm putting conservative people on. >> so senator collins, do you trust that he wouldn't want to make sure roe is overturned? >> well, as i said, i don't like to go into the details of my conversation with the president, but he did tell me that he would not be asking that question, and indeed it would be inappropriate to ask a judge nominee on how they are going to vote in a future case. discussion of precedent however is very important. what i want to see is a nominee who regardless of his or her personal views on the very difficult and contentious life issue is going to respect
precedent regardless. i've had a number of judges who say to me that good judges are always unhappy with some of their decisions but they make the right call regardless of their personal views, and that's what i want to see in this nominee. >> senator collins, i want to turn quickly to immigration. i'm sure you've seen the protests all over the nation this week. a judge ruled this week that children separated from their parents at the border must be reunited with their families within 30 days and those under five, 14 days. do you have confidence this administration can get that done? >> i'm very concerned about it. i had a lengthy discussion with the secretary of homeland security and i really pressed her on this issue because so far
only 500 children, it's my understanding, have been reunited with their parents and some 2,000 remain in detention centers. i think that's traumatizing to these children and contrary to our american values. also overlooked is the fact that there are some 10,000 unaccompanied minors who came here without their children. this is a problem that goes back into the obama administration when we saw a flood of unaccompanied minors coming into this country and we do not seem to have a good plan for how to deal with those children either. part of the answer is clearly working with the leaders of the home countries, the three countries of central america whose parents are sending these unaccompanied minors here or are
accompanying them here. so that is part of the answer but i'm going to continue to press secretary nielsen on this very important issue. it is simply inconsistent with our american values to split up families. >> okay, thanks so much for joining us, senator collins. >> thank you, maha. and now let's bring in senator amy klobuchar of minnesota. she's a key democrat on the judiciary committee set to question president trump's eventual supreme court pick. senator klobuchar, you just heard senator collins say there are some people on the president's original list of candidates she could not support. what's your reaction to that? >> well, i thought her comments were very heartening. susan collins, lisa murkowski have shown time and time again that they're willing to buck their party when it comes to important issues like supporting the affordable care act, defending planned parenthood,
defending women's fundamental rights. they have done that and those were the words i was hearing from senator collins. she is someone that respects precedent and that is what's so important about this position. as you noted at the beginning, this is a position that will have consequences for generations. the court makes decisions in the last decade about who you can marry, where you can go to school, what your work is going to be like. my grandpa was a miner 1500 feet under the ground and court decisions made his workplace safer. this is an incredibly important job and when you look at the cases that are going to come up, martha, including whether or not insurance companies can kick off people if they have a pre-existing condition, that was a case the administration just argued that down in texas. that case is going to make its way to the court. >> senator, we know you don't really support president trump. you differ with him on major issues, but when you look at
that list of 25, is there anyone on that you would support? >> the ones i've seen that have emerged to the top of the list, no. a number of them i have voted on already because i've already seen that when you look back at their record a number of them are writing concurrences where they go out of their way to try to make new law just as you saw with what justice gorsuch did recently about the reasonable expectation of privacy in a dissent that he wrote or when he joined with clarence thomas on an issue about racial redistricting and racial voting rights. you see this time and time again with some of these nominees and i think what you want is someone who's not an ideologue -- >> go ahead with that but how do you get a real sense of someone who wouldn't overturn roe v. wade?
>> you do that by asking questions and the first fork in the road here is going to be people like senator collins, republicans, and i wouldn't just say the women. let's hear from some of these men, senator flake, senator mccain, senator corker, others who weigh in, that you want someone who's going to hold precedent. roe v. wade 45 years on the book is precedent. the second thing is when you have a nominee you ask those questions. by the way, we asked brown v. board of education a number of nominees and they answered it if they thought that was a settled law of the land. yes, you're not supposed to ask questions and they're not going to talk about cases that may come before them, but i don't know why you wouldn't ask about cases that are 50, 100 years old and how they would have voted on those cases. that's how you figure out whether they put their money where their mouth is, whether they're really going to respect precedent.
>> the president met on thursday evening with senator collins as well as three of your fellow democrats who voted in favor of justice gorsuch, including north dakota senator heitkamp. she said of that meeting that she had urged the president to appoint someone who is, quote, pragmatic, fair, compassionate, committed to justice and above politics, but what do you say to your fellow democrats up for re-election in red states that trump dominated? wouldn't they damage their chances of re-election if they do not support his nominee? >> these are senators that are going to do the right thing. yes, they have bucked our party time and time again and that's part of who they are. they do what they feel is best for their state. on the other hand, you have seen them united, all 48 democrats from bernie sanders to joe manchin standing up to defend the affordable care act so that people don't get their health care taken away from them. so i think what they're doing is
similar to what senator collins has just said. they're saying, we want someone who's not an ideologue on the bench. while justice kennedy has been very conservative at times, he wrote the opinion on marriage equality. he was the deciding vote in the casey case that upheld roe v. wade. that was him. so if you look at his -- the arc of his decisions and what he's done, you want someone that's going to show that kind of independence and is not going to set us back to a time when a woman was made a criminal just for exercising her own reproductive rights. when you look at what we've seen -- >> senator klobuchar, i just want to make sure we move on a little bit here. beyond trying to sway public opinion, can you get the nominee to be delayed until after the mid-terms? how can you really do that? >> procedurally, that's going to be up to when the majority leader brings this forward, but
we can make this case that this isn't ancient precedent. in 2016 the republicans took the position that you shouldn't vote on a nominee in an election year and it wasn't just because it was a presidential election. you've got senator hatch saying you shouldn't do it in a political year. we have roger wicker saying that the election will determine the type of senate that we will have, his words, so we should wait until after the election year. so we will be strongly making that case and taking our -- every single senator should be able to meet with the nominee. while senator collins used that figure 65 days, i believe it's longer when you look back through history at how long it has taken for a judge to actually have a vote on the floor. we want to make sure -- >> justice gorsuch, 66 days, justice sotomayor, 66 days. but i want to move on. are you saying that the court
should start without a full bench or that justice kennedy should stay beyond his retirement date of july 31st? >> i'm saying that certainly the republicans made the argument in 2016 that they could take their time and you could have 8 on the bench. i didn't agree with them back then but they set a new precedent. we're saying you should let the people have a say until after the election in this critical position. what's more important is the decision that's being made right now by the president and that we must continue to weigh in on having a balanced person that's going to look at the law and look at precedent and make decisions based on the law. >> and i want to just get you quickly on immigration. you too saw those protests, i'm sure, this weekend and calls to abolish i.c.e. do you think i.c.e. should be abolished, immigration customs enforcement? >> i think what has to change
are the policies and the people that are making these policies are making horrendous decisions like separating kids from their parents. we are always going to need immigration enforcement, martha. i think we know that. we are a major country with major borders, so to me the issue is what are those policies and please let's get comprehensive immigration reform, something i've strongly supported for years. we passed a bill out of the senate that not only involved order at the border and funding for that, it also involved a path to citizenship for people who obey the law, for people who learn to speak english, for people who are part of this country for decades. that's what i think we need which of course includes the dreamers, includes people who have been here legally. that is what we need to do. i am just appalled by how this administration has been talking about immigrants. they don't diminish america. they are america. >> okay, thanks very much for
joining us this morning, senator klobuchar. up next, the view of the trump presidency from outside washington. i go on the road from virginia to tennessee to texas to take the nation's pulse on trade, the supreme court and the debate over civility. and later, the powerhouse roundtable weighs in on the debate over immigration. we'll be right back. ♪ hawaii is in the middle of the pacific ocean. we're the most isolated population on the planet. ♪ hawaii is the first state in the u.s. to have 100% renewable energy goal. we're a very small electric utility. but, if we don't make this move we're going to have changes in our environment, and have a negative impact to hawaii's economy. ♪ verizon provided us a solution
using smart sensors on their network that lets us collect near real time data on our power grid. (colton) this technology is helping us integrate rooftop solar, which is a very important element of getting us to our renewable energy goals. ♪ (shelee) if we can create our own energy, we can take care of this beautiful place that i grew up in. ♪ thanks to move free ultra... i walk with this girl.
ride with this crew. do the wave with these guys. and hang with this little one. that's because move free ultra is clinically proven to keep my joints moving better than glucosamine chondroitin. which means i'm free to rock on with this gang. move free ultra. movement keeps us connected. money managers are pretty much the same. all but while some push high commission investment products, fisher investments avoids them. some advisers have hidden and layered fees. fisher investments never does. and while some advisers are happy to earn commissions from you whether you do well or not, fisher investments fees are structured so we do better when you do better. maybe that's why most of our clients come from other money managers. fisher investments. clearly better money management. why settle for just clean
when it could be finished? when clean just isn't clean enough there's finished. new finish quantum's three chamber technology combines to scrub, degrease, and shine. switch to all new finish quantum. ♪ from only the thickest, juiciest heinz tomatoes. no one grows ketchup like heinz™. this is not a screensaver.game. this is the destruction of a cancer cell by the body's own immune system, thanks to medicine that didn't exist until now. and today can save your life. ♪ ♪
almost every sunday we come to the end of the week finding it difficult to remember how the week began. the trump administration, the news cycle moving so fast here in washington that it is easy to forget how many monumental issues we face each week and how much those issues affect us all. so we wanted to head out on a cross-country drive at the beginning of the week to experience headlines outside of washington, a view that can be very different from that in the nation's capital and a view that reminded us that despite the missteps, the chaos, the divide that splits this nation, donald trump is seen by many as a hugely successful president. >> reporter: our week began in rural virginia 200 miles from washington but smack in the middle of one of the latest controversies. >> basically we were hoping it would be a way to show our
support for what this little tiny restaurant did. >> if you can refuse to bake a cake for a gay couple because that's your right, then why can't the red hen tell sarah huckabee sanders that they don't want to serve her? >> reporter: five short days ago this block was the epicenter of the national divide, and talking to people on the street was unsettling. >> somebody just gave us the finger. >> yeah, exactly. instead of saying, hey, let's sit down and figure out how to make this thing work, we're starting to polarize in the country. >> reporter: clayton rockwell was solidly on the side of donald trump's press secretary, mincing no words about the restaurant's owner. >> she needs to go back where she came from. >> where was that? >> from what i hear, new york, meryl streep and all them other trash up there. >> reporter: the divide was no less apparent as we headed southwest to our next stop in tennessee where the topic was tariffs. >> we make rum, gin, vodka,
bourbon and moonshine. >> reporter: kent merit who voted for gary johnson in 2016 is worried about the effect of trump's tariffs. >> what might it do to your business? are you talking about losing employees? are you -- >> yes, that's possible. i understand that there are issues with the trade imbalance that we have with other countries but this is going to hurt this industry. adding tariffs adds cost on every side. >> reporter: we continued our journey along the streets of nashville, across farm country, through violent storms, to dickson county, tennessee which backed trump 70% in the election. tim span owns a men's wear store on main street. >> the economy is doing better than it was previously so when the economy is doing better, i'm doing better. >> and you've actually seen that? >> yes, yes. people spend more money. >> reporter: twila snyder loves that donald trump speaks his mind. >> i love it that he's not
controlled by the republican party, the democratic party. he's -- he is a very different personality and it makes him uniquely suited for the job. he doesn't give a crap what anyone thinks. >> reporter: that is one of the many trump messages, like mistrust of the media and government institutions, that supporters here are getting loud and clear. william turner is a registered democrat who voted for trump. >> if tomorrow robert mueller said there was collusion in the trump campaign, there was obstruction of justice, would you believe it? >> no. >> why not? >> i just have that much faith in donald trump, right or wrong. >> reporter: back on the road and heading for dallas when the biggest news of the week breaks. >> supreme court justice anthony m. kennedy announcing he will retire. this leaves a major opening. >> reporter: the supreme court just upheld the president's travel ban against muslims, and
for camille, a muslim immigrant from turkey who's lived in the u.s. for 15 years, trump policies, whether targeting illegal immigration or legal immigration, have had a chilling effect. >> i'm registered as a republican, just so you know. since he started running the campaign and targeting muslims -- i'm muslim by the way -- then yes, there's been fear. there's been fear, but -- especially my kids' school, too. they are not comfortable telling other people that they're muslims. i think it comes to what makes america great, in my opinion, it is the diverse thought and diverse belief. >> reporter: for others we met in plano, texas, another big issue could be at stake with the supreme court turnover. >> i do believe that it is a woman's right to choose what to do with her body. >> reporter: this 20-year-old college student was a clinton supporter. >> there's lots of talk of overturning roe v. wade.
>> it frightens me as a young female, just knowing that that right is possibly just going to go out the window. >> reporter: stacy shelby from louisiana is interning in dallas this summer. she feels vulnerable in trump's america. >> i think it's been very tiring is the word i would use and disheartening and i think it's had a negative effect on me as a student and on me as an african-american woman because people feel more empowered to say things that can be hurtful to various communities. >> reporter: it's that hurt, that split we saw from the beginning to the end of the trip. these young law students we met at a dallas boot store say they are struggling but determined to bridge the gap, with texas native kirsty wallace offering an emotional, eloquent conclusion. >> something i battled with personally is not losing faith in my fellow americans and just
recognizing that trump is striking a chord with certain people for particular reasons and it's very easy to vilify them and i struggle with that a lot, a lot of bitterness and resentment of how could you, you know, support this man and his policies, and so it's been a hard line for me to walk and i'm still figuring out how to do it with grace and understanding. >> grace and understanding, something we could all work on. up next, the roundtable weighs in on the political divide from the immigration protests we saw across the country this weekend to the looming battle over the supreme court. we'll be right back. o the looming battle over the supreme court. we'll be right back. behr marquee presents: it's got potential. -i think it'll look really good without the stripes. margo and sam had a vision, brought to life in one coat. whatever your home may hand you, behr through it, in one coat.
behr marquee, #1 rated interior paint. guaranteed in 1,000 plus colors. right now, get incredible savings on behr paints, stains and primers. exclusively at the home depot. you might or joints.hing for your heart... but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally found in jellyfish, prevagen is the number one selling brain-health supplement in drug stores nationwide. prevagen. the name to remember. why settle for just clean when it could be finished? when clean just isn't clean enough there's finished. new finish quantum's three chamber technology combines to scrub, degrease, and shine. switch to all new finish quantum. captured lightning in a bottle. over 260 years later as the nation's leader in energy storage we're ensuring americans have the energy they need, whenever they need it nextera energy. if you spit blood you may have gum problems,s and could be on the journey to much worse.
try parodontax toothpaste. it's clinically proven to remove plaque, the main cause of bleeding gums. for healthy gums and strong teeth. leave bleeding gums behind with parodontax toothpaste. they're all going in the same direction but in very different ways and pampers gives all of them our driest best fitting diaper. pampers cruisers with three-way fit. they adapt at the waist, legs and bottom with up to twelve hours of protection for all the freedom to move their way in pampers cruisers only pampers diapers are the number one choice of hospitals, nurses and parents. thanks to move free ultra... i walk with this girl. ride with this crew. do the wave with these guys. and hang with this little one. that's because move free ultra is clinically proven to keep my joints moving better than glucosamine chondroitin.
of vice news, cokie, governor chris christie all ready to take on the week. all week long you can get the latest on the politics and the white house with breaking news alerts on the abc news app. multi-task, download it during the break. percussion massage. hern not cool. freezing away fat cells with coolsculpting? now that's cool. coolsculpting safely freezes and removes fat cells. with little or no downtime. and no surgery. results and patient experience may vary. some rare side effects include temporary numbness, discomfort, and swelling. ask your doctor if coolsculpting is right for you. and visit coolsculpting.com today for your chance to win a free treatment. (wienermobile horn) to put a better hot dog it's oscain every hand.ion and that's just what we do. with no artificial preservatives, no added nitrates or nitrites, and by waving bye to by-products.
so you can get back to loving them. for the love of hot dogs. (wienermobile horn) if his denture can cope with... a steak. luckily for him, he uses super poligrip. it helps give him 65% more chewing power. leaving brad to dig in and enjoy. super poligrip. uh, all the cars? at carmax, we buy all the cars. all the cars. old cars? yes. new cars? oh, yeah. sports cars? indeed. a big ol' boat-like car? permission to come aboard! what about a car that's all (makes awkward car noises) hgnnnn-nn-nn-nnnn-ayy-ayyy i don't see why not. what about, let's say... oh, i don't know, a purple van with a painting of a wizard just shooting lightning out of his fingers riding a unicorn sneezing rainbows? definitely. just asking for a friend. yea, i figured. (whispered to camera) wow. this is not a screensaver.game. this is the destruction of a cancer cell by the body's own immune system, thanks to medicine that didn't exist until now.
and today can save your life. ♪ ♪ studies show that omega-3s are great for your health. but did you know that 98% of us don't get enough of them? that's why megared advanced 4in1 packs more omega-3 power into just one small softgel. it supports four vital areas of your body. your heart... your brain... your eyes... and your joints. give your body the omega-3s it's missing. megared advanced 4in1. one pill. more power. ♪ hawaii is in the middle of the pacific ocean. we're the most isolated population on the planet. ♪
hawaii is the first state in the u.s. to have 100% renewable energy goal. we're a very small electric utility. but, if we don't make this move we're going to have changes in our environment, and have a negative impact to hawaii's economy. ♪ verizon provided us a solution using smart sensors on their network that lets us collect near real time data on our power grid. (colton) this technology is helping us integrate rooftop solar, which is a very important element of getting us to our renewable energy goals. ♪ (shelee) if we can create our own energy, we can take care of this beautiful place that i grew up in. ♪ let's bring in our powerhouse roundtable. abc news political analyst
matthew dowd, shawna thomas, we welcome washington bureau chief for vice news, abc news cokie roberts and former new jersey governor and abc news contributor chris christie, welcome all of you. chris christie, i want to start with you. you just heard what senator collins said. this supreme court nominee is so important. she said she could not support anyone who wanted to overturn roe v. wade. >> well listen, i think that everyone is going to have their own view on this and i don't think you're going to have anybody who's going to be that outright about giving their opinion on that case or any other case. so senator collins is going to have to do what every other senator is going to have to do which is look back at the person's record as a judge on the bench for any kind of long period of time, look at their record and writings and everything else and try to figure out what they think might happen. i think in the end what the president is most likely to do is to pick someone who he believes takes the right type of
judicial approach but has a judicial temperament that's going to be very difficult to attack. >> it doesn't seem there's any indication that he's going to choose someone who's more moderate like justice kennedy. >> i don't think so. by the way, i kind of ugh about this a little bit as a republican, like who's the moderate on the democratic side that has been selected lately? you might be able to argue justice breyer every once in a while but certainly not kagan or ginsburg or sotomayor. >> president clinton thought ginsberg was. >> good luck. >> he was unhappy about that. but i think the notion of donald trump judging somebody's temperament is somewhat odd and i'm not sure that that's something he's able to do. i think it's going to be very much advice coming from people in the senate. >> matt, do democrats really have any power to defeat trump's nominee? >> this is an exclamation point of why elections have consequences. >> exactly. >> and the president has a complete right to nominate a
conservative judge to the court. democrats had that right when they held presidential office. i do think -- but the democrats have an obligation and a right of advice and consent and to raise concerns and to generate enthusiasm for what their beliefs are in this. i do think we've come to a point and reflected in your piece of how divided the country is, is that i would hope the president would consider possibly nominating somebody that would get more than 50 or 51 votes because i think that's the problem we're in. >> good luck with that though. >> but i think that's the problem. >> we have people -- my own senator from new jersey, cory booker, has already said that there's no one the president could nominate that he would vote for, so how do you get -- >> he would get killed in the democratic party if he did. >> i'm not saying it's not smart, just the reality of today. >> the democrats, they know there's nothing they can do, right? so it's how long can we have this conversation about the next time around making sure there
are more democratic senators, that kind of thing. all they can do is use it to campaign in 2018 at this point. so i think one of the things is we're not even going to see any kind of hearings until probably, what, october? they will be able to keep making this an issue. that's about it. >> you've looked into what kind of potential cases the court could take up. >> yes. >> this isn't just about roe v. wade. >> no, it's not. it's about a lot of little cases that are, windowing their way through the courts right now that deal with adorbortiabortio deal with gerrymandering, that deal with all these things. we saw it on thursday when you had senator booker, senator kamala harris, people in front of the supreme court railing about they have to do everything. what they can do is keep yelling and talking about it and make sure that people know that some of these cases, like what we see in iowa with the 72-hour ban, what we see in mississippi as well as louisiana, that people have those cases in mind, that they know that they need to go to the ballot box to vote for something and this is a step towards 2020.
>> really, elections do have consequences when it comes to supreme court nominations. i covered the bork nomination. >> remind us about that. >> so what happened was robert bork was nominated by president reagan and was a very conservative justice and people think that he did himself in in the hearings because he did behave in the hearings in a way that was quite arrogant. i remember when he was asked why do you want this job, instead of saying i want to serve the public, all that, he said it's an intellectual feast. so it was all about him and that didn't work for him but the truth is he had lost before the hearings because of the election. >> and the lessoned learned. >> the lessoned learned there, i remember talking to a southern moderate democrat when such things existed and i expected him to say i'm for bork and he said i was elected by women and blacks. that's who elected me. who's against bork? women and blacks. >> let me wax philosophical for just a second. >> oh, no. >> oh wow.
>> you can jump in later. >> if we eliminate the expectation that we can't have nominees anymore that can bridge the divide, then we've basically decided the country is to divided that we may not bother anymore. and today is the anniversary of gettysburg, right? in a time with incredible divisions, the greatest battle loss of any battle in the history of the country. lincoln's words at the gettysburg address where he said we are now engaged in a great civil war, testing the idea, the proposition that a country so conceived and so dedicated can long endure. i think if we say there's no way, the country is too divided, this is the way it's going to be, i think there should be an expectation of the president that he nominate somebody that is able to get democratic votes. i think we should keep that expectation. >> you can wax philosophical all you want. i want to say on this 1500-mile drive, that divide was so stark, people so dug in, it was really eye-opening.
>> it's the greatest danger to our republic. that is the greatest danger -- >> wasn't merrick garland the example? >> yes, and look what happened. >> thank god we have no huge moral issue like slavery. there can be nothing like slavery. >> we have many moral issues. immigration is a moral issue. >> i agree with you completely but it's not something that we're going to go to war over. >> wait a second -- >> does donald trump take any blame for this division? >> everybody who's involved in public life takes place. let's face it, everybody takes a piece of the blame for where we are. i don't think it's just the president, although he's the president so everybody wants to talk about that. but i also, maybe it's because i'm from new jersey but i do believe that this country was founded on the idea of argument. it was founded on that idea of debate, division at times and people going at each other. >> but then came together.
>> but i don't believe that 51 votes is not coming together. in the end for this and for supreme court nominees that are in this time where the issues are so stark, you're not going to find that any longer. and i would also -- >> it wasn't until recently -- it used to be 60 votes. >> wait a second. we're talking about -- >> talk about shooting yourself in the foot. >> we're talking about 25 years or so, matt, not a recent development since we had that. >> no. 60 votes in the last six years, five years. >> when they turn the cameras off on the hill and elsewhere, is it different? do you sense that it's different? i will say on this trip, the cameras are on, you're fake news, you're this, you're that, but people were so kind to me and welcoming. there were two women -- one woman who absolutely loved trump walking with her friend who absolutely loved hillary clinton. so the country is divided in some places but are they behind
the scenes? >> i think behind the scenes, especially with senators who have been there a long time, i think they're still somewhat friendly and they still somewhat like each other. i think they want to figure out a better to way to do this but they also when the cameras are on and they're back in their home districts and they know they have an election coming up, they have to say what they have to say. it's a little different in the house because there's so many new people and we're probably going to have a lot of turnover again. i play in a congressional softball game and on the other side are women from congress who are republicans and democrats and they enjoy hanging out with each other. >> it's much truer among the women, much truer. really the last bit of bipartisanship in the senate is among the women. >> by the way, we're focused on the elected officials. i think your point is much more important. among the american people we still like each other. we can have these political arguments and we can have disagreements and it's only the extremes in both sides who make this a make or break issue at every cocktail party and every barbecue.
>> i think there's a fear among people and this is totally anecdotal but i see my mom, 70-something years old, in texas, southern black woman, lived through the civil rights era and she's scared. some of this is watching too much msnbc, don't get me wrong. >> please stop her. >> but she is worried about where the country is going, more so worried than during the civil rights era which i was not alive for clearly. that worry is going to continue to tear people apart. >> there's a major consensus -- the thing is the voters are united on many things. there's major consensus on what we should do about immigration, major consensus on what we should do about guns, major consensus on many things like what we should do in the economy. the problem is our institutions and politics no longer pays attention to what the major consensus is. we have a practice in politics in washington where if they went
along with what 70% of the country wanted to do, all of these things would be solved, but they don't. >> you see the example in new york's 14th district. fewer than 5% of the eligible voters turned out to vote. what you have then is the most extreme people turning out to vote and then those are the people who are elected. >> and quickly in new york, big surprise in new york. >> absolutely. >> with the 28-year-old. >> yes, but no. in today's environment party primaries are the most dangerous territory for anybody to try to navigate right now. joe crowley learned it this past week. >> you got to campaign. >> you have to pay attention. >> not only they have to campaign but sometimes in this environment the most extreme are rewarded and we've seen that in a bunch of different places. >> she was much more culturally in line with that district and much has been made about her stance on certain issues. her stand on medicare for all and her stand on single payer is way more supported by the country than donald trump's tax cuts, than donald trump's immigration plan and donald trump's stand on guns.
>> abolish i.c.e., do you think that's a good way to campaign? i mean, that seems to play -- >> that's crazy. >> if we want to talk about a state agency, let's look at tsa for all of us who travel. i think there are questions being raised. obviously i.c.e. an the people that work for i.c.e. are a function of the leadership and a function of what they do is a function of what they're being told to do and what they're encouraged to do. >> but the point of getting rid -- >> don't get rid of it. it's crazy. >> it's a terrible idea. >> here's the problem in our politics today, real quick. she wins the primary by saying abolish i.c.e. so what happens, kirsten gillibrand who is supposed to be smarter says abolish i.c.e. kamala harris said it and the lemming start following down the line because they want to run for president. that's not leadership and that's why people are cynical. stuff like that, no one thinks we should abolish immigration customs enforcement. come on. >> okay, and that's going to be
and now we honor our fellow americans who serve and sacrifice. in the month of june, one soldier died and now we honor our fellow americans who serve and sacrifice. in the month of june, one soldier died overseas supporting operations in somalia. and a final note, we have covered conflict around the world for decades, losing many colleagues in war zones along the way, but to see my fellow journalists gunned down on u.s. soil while sitting in a small town newspaper office less than 50 miles from here was simply devastating. i hope everyone can appreciate and respect the work they did, the work journalists try to do every day. please keep those five who lost their lives, their families and the surviving staff that still managed to put out a newspaper the next day in your thoughts and prayers as we celebrate america's freedom this week.