tv This Week With George Stephanopoulos ABC December 20, 2021 12:00am-1:00am PST
>> announcer: "this week" with george stephanopoulos starts right now. >> announcer: "this week" with george stephanopoulos starts right now. holiday nightmare. >> things will get worse as we go into the depth of the winter. >> people are underestimating the power of omicron. >> for unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death. >> as omicron sweeps across the
country, covid cases skyrocket, reaching the highest point in a year. sporting events postponed, holiday shows canceled, testing lines return as hospitals once again reach a breaking point. we dig into what we know about omicron, and how to stay safe with dr. anthony fauci. in contempt. >> we don't take this step lightly. >> dramatic text messages to trump chief of staff mark meadows made public. the house votes to find him in con felt for refusing to testify. >> if witnesses can merely pick and choose when they comply, our power of oversight will be gone. >> congressman adam kinzinger, one of two republicans on the january 6th committee joins us live. stalled. >> a 50/50 senate sucks. we can't get things done. >> biden's agenda on hold as senator joe manchin digs in. the democrats' build back better plan gets punted to the new year.
will they ever get it done? our powerhouse roundtable covers all the week's politics. >> announcer: from abc news it's "this week." here now, co-anchor jonathan karl. good morning, and welcome to "this week." as christmas approaches, covid-19 again threatens to upend american life. driving the spread, omicron. at least 43 states now have confirmed cases of the latest and by far most contagious variant yet. on saturday alone, new york state reported nearly 22,000 new covid cases breaking a single day record set just the day before. nationwide cases are up 90% since late october. hospitals are now back at the brink. this week, new york, ohio, new hampshire and maine, all activated their national guards to help understaffed health care facilities. as we approach another year of the pandemic, the united states
is averaging nearly 1,200 deaths every day. the overall death toll this week surpassing 800,000, the highest of any country in the world. all of this is prompting another wave of anxiety, uncertainty, and fresh cancellations. some schools and universities are going remote. professional sports leagues postponing games. broadway shows and the famed rockettes going dark. in some ways, it's beginning to feel like march of 2020 all over again, but there are hopeful signs too. the vaccines appear effective against omicron, and a clinical trial this week showed a new covid treatment pill is nearly 90% effective at preventing hospitalizations and deaths. big questions remain as we head into the new year. how dangerous is omicron? can families gather safely for the holidays, and when does all of this end? we begin this morning with president biden's chief medical
adviser, dr. anthony fauci. dr. fauci, thank you for joining us. >> good to be with you. thank you for having me. >> you've seen all the numbers. how bad is this going to be? >> well, certainly we need to take this very seriously because one thing about omicron that's very clear, not only now in our own country, but clearly through south africa, the uk, and other countries, it has an extraordinary capability of transmitting from person to person. it seems to be overtaking all the other variants, including delta, with a doubling time of about two to three days which means this is really something to be reckoned with. it's really rapidly spreading literally throughout the world and certainly in our own country. >> now you said earlier this week that if you are vaccinated, you should feel comfortable traveling and celebrating the holidays with your family. do you still believe that? >> no, i do. if you are vaccinated and boosted, and are prudent when
you travel, when you are in an airport, to be wearing a mask all the time, you have to be wearing a mask on a plane. do not do things like go to gatherings where there are people who you do not know what their vaccination status is. if you do that, and some people are even going the extra step or the extra mile, or maybe even getting tested when you have people coming over the house. we now have a much wider availability or point of care test that you can get a result in about 15 minutes. so you might want to do that. if you do these things, jon, i do believe that you can feel quite comfortable with a family setting, dinners and the gatherings that you have around the holiday season. nothing is 100% risk-free, but i think if you do the things i just mentioned, you actually mitigate that risk enough to feel comfortable about being able to enjoy the holiday. >> you mentioned testing, but we've seen these massive lines
all over the country of people waiting to get tested, you know, people trying to go and get the instant tests at pharmacies, drugstores, simply finding them out of stock. when are those tests that you just described going to be truly available and affordable to everybody the way they are in europe? i mean, they cost a dollar or two in most of europe. when are they going to be available like that here? >> well, in some places, it is spotty. there are some places where you can easily get them, but there are others where you are quite correct. it is difficult, and their long lines. what the government has been doing now, and you will be seeing the result of that is making the investment literally in billions of dollars to get anywhere from 200 million to 500 million tests available per month, which means that there will be a lot of tests. many of them will be free. there are going to be 10,000 centers that are going to be giving out free testing. so i think you're going to be seeing as we get a little bit further, maybe a week or two or three, much more availability of
testing. >> so with that, and what you have described as, you know, the way to be prudent, the success of vaccines and boosters, we are not headed towards anything approaching the kind of lockdown we saw last year, are we? >> i don't see that in the future if we do the things we're talking about. jon, the thing that continues to be very troublesome to me and my public health colleagues is the fact we still have 50 million people in the country who are eligible to be vaccinated who are not vaccinated. when you have that degree of vulnerability, and you have a virus like omicron that spreads so rapidly, it is quite likely that we are going to see in some sections of the country, a significant stress on the hospital system as well as on the health care workers who are getting exhausted by all of this. so the stress is going to be there. i don't foresee the kind of lockdowns that we've seen before, but i certainly see the potential for stress on our
hospital system. >> we still have no vaccine available for little children, for children under the age of 5, and of course, there was a setback in the clinical trial for that vaccine. how big a setback is that? >> well, you know, it's unfortunate, jon. i would like to have seen the capability of getting all the children at all ages vaccinated as we get into the first quarter of the 2022. when you look at the data that came out, it was felt that at least for a certain age group, the 2 to 4, that it really is not meeting the end point that they expected in the trials. so they're now looking at this as a three-dose vaccine for children, and if you are going to do that, you're going to need more data, and that's going to delay what we had hoped would be a time frame for getting those younger children vaccinated. >> there was some good news.
there was this clinical trial of an anti-viral pill by pfizer. pfizer says that it was 90% effective at preventing hospitalizations and deaths. how big a breakthrough -- is that potentially the game-changer we have been waiting for? >> jon, that's going to be really important because if you look at the data, and this is from data, the data are really quite impressive. if you get an anti-viral that up to 90% will prevent you from going from clinically recognizable infection to blocking your getting to the hospital or dying in a 90% chance if you get treated within the first three days of the onset of symptoms, that is big deal. i mean, that is really, really good. so we're looking forward to getting that particular product mass produced to the point it would be available to people who are really anywhere who need it, and there are going to be a lot
of people of high risk who are going to benefit greatly from having a pill that would dramatically diminish the likelihood they will wind up in the hospital. >> how soon realistically do you think something like that would be widely available? >> you know, it's going to be months. it's a very complicated, synthetic process to make the drug. it is not something that's simple. so the company is revving up in getting more and more, but we're not going to see widely available for at least a few months. >> in colorado, 80% of those who are hospitalized are people who did not get vaccinated, and even those who are vaccinated in the hospital are for the most part those who had serious conditions. i want to play you governor polis said about his decision not to reinstate a mask mandate. >> the truth is we now have highly effective vaccines that work far better than masks. at this point, if you haven't been vaccinated it's your own
darn fault. people who want to be protected, those who get sick, it's almost entirely their own darn fault. >> do you agree with that? is this really becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated and really a crisis of the unvaccinated? >> you know, it is certainly much more of a crisis of the unvaccinated, but there are other tools besides vaccine, and wearing a mask complements the protection that you get from the vaccine, and a boost. so i don't think you should be in a situation that if you are vaccinated, you don't ever have to worry about wearing a mask. vaccinated or unvaccinated under certain circumstances, masks work in diminishing the likelihood that you are going to get infected or that if you are infected and without symptoms, that you're going to spread it to someone else. so it's not an either/or. you can do both and should do both. >> let me ask you. president biden was in kentucky meeting with victims of the tornadoes and a lot of people
noticed that he was outside, and he's obviously boosted, vaccinated and boosted, but he was outside hugging people, not wearing a mask. is that -- does that put him at risk, something like that? >> well, you know, outdoors is really much different than indoors, very much so, jon, and that's the reason why when we always talk about if you are in an indoor congregate setting, and i'm with the president a fair amount, and i can tell you when he's indoors, he's got a mask on. that's for sure. >> okay. i also wanted to ask you about what the airline executive said this week about masks on airplanes. they -- several of the top, you know, ceos of the top airlines said that on an airplane, you are actually safer than you are in an icu, the protection with the filtration system they have. they were suggesting there really isn't much of a need for a mask on an airplane. are we going to get to the point where we won't have to wear
masks on airplanes? >> i don't think so. i think when you're dealing with a closed space, even though the filtration is good, that you want to go that extra step when you have people, you know, you get a flight from washington to san francisco, it's well over a five-hour flight. even though you have a good filtration system, i still believe that masks are a prudent thing to do, and we should be doing it. >> so finally, i know that your birthday is coming up. it's christmas eve. you're going to be turning 81. i think you're probably for the last two years, you have been one of the hardest working human beings in america. first of all, thank you for your service, but let me ask you. do you feel a responsibility to stay doing what you are doing until this has truly gotten under control? like i said, i think you're the hardest working person of any age, one of them in the country. >> absolutely, jon. there's no doubt about it.
this is the thing that i do. this is what i have been trained and experienced in doing my entire professional life. there's no way i'm going to walk away from this until we get this under control. i mean, that's the purpose of what we do. that's -- that's our mission in life. in the middle of it, i'm not going to walk away. you know, we're in a war, jon. it's kind of like we're halfway through world war ii, and you decide, i think i have had enough of this. i'm walking away. you can't do that. you've got to finish it, and we're going to finish this and get back to normal. >> all right. well, thank you for that, dr. fauci, and let me just wish you in advance, a happy birthday and a merry christmas. >> thank you very much, jon. you too, and to your family. all right, and our roundtable is not walking away either. we have the ceo of democracy for america, yvette simpson, former trump justice department official sarah isgur, rachel
bade, and "washington post" national political reporter robert costa, co-author of "peril," with bob woodward. yvette, let me start with you. biden was the guy elected to put this behind us, and you remember right before july 4th, he said we were close to having independence -- declaring independence from the pandemic. what's happened? >> you know, i think what's happened is people have gotten relaxed. i mean, once the vaccinations started to come out, mask mandates started to go down, and people got comfortable and, you know, people have talked about covid fatigue. it's real, but we have to continue to remind people that folks are dying from covid every day, and when these surges happen, this is a real issue, and we might end up right back where we started. so i think in the beginning people would have given biden an a-plus in his role on the covid cries. you have to stay on it and continue to do the work because something that's going to be
with us for a long time. >> it's hard for republicans to hit him on this because you have republicans fighting the efforts to contain the virus. >> oh, i disagree. i think that biden's in a really tough spot here because people are pandemic-ed out. you have huge amounts of pandemic fatigue and you have republicans being able to hit him to say that, you know, everything he does is wrong, and the more biden puts in place, vaccine mandates -- imagine. we have companies here who have over 1 million people. even 10% of those people, 5% of those people quit over a vaccine mandate, and that would, you know, talk about a supply chain issue, but then -- or weekly testing? do you know the infrastructure you would have to build at a company that has 1.6 million american employees to do weekly testing? huge economic lags that will have political implications for the biden administration. labor issue leads to supply chain issue leads to inflation. >> clearly this is affecting biden's popularity and perhaps
even his domestic agenda. so we had build back better, the big social infrastructure bill, seems to be put off. whether it will, you know, what kind of traction it will get, i want to play for you an interview that kamala harris did with charlamagne tha god on his comedy central show "the god's honest truth" showing some real frustration with a particular senator from west virginia. >> who is the real president of this country? is it joe manchin or joe biden, madam vice president? >> come on, charlamagne. it's joe biden. >> i can't tell sometimes. >> no, no, no. no, no, no, no. it's joe biden. >> do you think joe manchin is a problem? >> and it's joe biden, and i'm vice president, and my name is kamala harris. >> some passion there from the vice president, but by the way, some breaking news, senator manchin has just said he is a firm no on this legislation. so let me ask you, rachel, and i don't want to put you on the spot, but you had been saying
for some time you thought it was a matter of if -- not a matter of if, but when this legislation passed. what do you think now? >> yeah. i think it's time to reassess that prognosis. clearly they've got a big problem here on a number of issues. number one, they've sort of lost their greatest forcing mechanism to get this done. that was the christmas deadline that chuck schumer set out in congress, you know, that if lawmakers want to get something done, you bump it up right up against the holidays and often that clears the deck and gets things through. that didn't work. neither did the expiration of the enhanced child tax credit going into an election year. democrats sort of saw this as something they had to pass to extend that child tax credit to keep making sure american families get these payments in an election year where they're facing an uphill battle, and joe manchin saying he's a no on build back better. look, this is a guy who has a fundamental, ideological problem with spending $2 trillion at a time when we have a $30 trillion debt and inflation is at a 40, you know, year high. this is going to be a big problem for him.
he has problems with the structure of the bill and i'm not sure it can pass the way it is right now. they might have to totally rework this thing, and we don't know what it's going to look like or if it's going to happen. >> and it's not like manchin kept a secret what rachel just said. he's actually been pretty consistent. there was optimism we've heard coming out of the white house that oh, he was going to come around. >> the backstory here, jon, is intriguing because senator manchin back in march was a critical vote for president biden to pass that $1.9 trillion american rescue plan, and at the time, president biden had to go to the wall and really plead with manchin. come around on this, joe. i need this vote. my presidency's on the line, and manchin somewhat reluctantly came along, gave biden the vote he needed on that $1.9 trillion bill, but some of the white house's own political capital as we've shown in my own reporting has been spent with manchin and he doesn't feel pressure from
this white house or from progressives. >> well, progressives, yvette? >> well, i think the biggest actually -- the biggest hook we had to keep manchin was the infrastructure bill, and that's why so many progressives wanted those bills tied together. once you give the big cheese to republicans and to manchin, they have zero incentive to stay at the table, and we know that manchin has been square before. he said four, and then he said two, the reality is, manchin has zero incentive. despite the fact that west virginians need this bill probably more than any other state because he is in a position where he is frankly being paid a lot by lobbyists, a lot by big companies, and he has zero desire to actually deliver for the people who need it here. >> so what do you and the progressives do about it? >> well, we continue to push and fight. i want to go back to the charlamagne comment, and i want to say that the vice president did exactly what she had to do there, but the question charlamagne is asking
is a question a lot of americans are asking. who is in charge here? it doesn't look like joe biden is in charge. manchin is pulling a lot of punches and he's making it look like joe biden doesn't know what he's doing and he's not the man in control. >> the democrats have a huge political problem here which is they have been overselling and saying they can pass this bill for a long time. education, health care, climate change, and now joe manchin is saying he's not there. if he gets his way and sort of re-works this bill, we might actually see a bill that does one of these things, but not, you know, all of these things, and democrats have specifically structured this bill so that they would only fund these programs for a couple of years, but they could do everything they wanted. but he's saying he doesn't want to do that. he wants to pick one or two, and that's going to really cause a problem for the base. democrats have been telling their own base they're going to get this done, and that could decrease further turnout in an election year. they're already facing this uphill battle to keep the house and the senate. they have a real problem. >> they see a moment for the biden presidency passing him. the republicans are favored to win back the house.
axios has a new story out this morning saying that kevin mccarthy's kind of master plan is a series of investigations, investigating the biden administration in, you know, a whole range of issues. >> it's incredible that the democratic party has not pursued what david shore, former obama data guy dubbed popularism. pursue popular things. just pass the extended child care tax credit, for instance. don't tie it to climate change and all these other things. the reason that joe biden's poll numbers were doing actually fine in the modern version of approval numbers until august was a competency argument. it was the failure in afghanistan, doubled by then a flimflamming around when delta hit, and then overpromising a total inability to get his people in order while the progressives are -- >> yvette is not only shaking her head, but she's sighing. >> every piece of this legislation is popular. they have all been polled to death. every piece of the build back -- it's not about popular, and it's not about manchin having a
spending problem. he had no problem increasing the military budjet. he had no problem spending money on tax cuts for the rich. he has a problem because he is not serving the people in his district. he's serving himself, and we have to call that out and says that's the truth. >> he's a democrat winning in a state that donald trump won by 30 points and you're saying he's not serving the people of his district? he keeps winning. >> west virginians are among the poorest in the nation. they need -- >> you are going to give that to republicans? mitch mcconnell is going to be thrilled. >> how about a person who does their job as a representative? all you're supposed to do is represent your people and overwhelmingly west virginians support this legislation. >> bob? >> if you listen to president biden's remarks in south carolina this week, he spoke at south carolina state. he reminded the audience that the stakes are bigger than just build back better. democracy is also on the agenda in 2022. >> that's true. >> voting rights are on the agenda. so, as much as senator manchin
is at the center of the discussion, he's not at the center of the american debate, and many democrats who i'm speaking with are saying we need to remind voters in 2022 about the mistakes and about why biden won more votes than any other american presidential candidate. >> it's the legislation that democrats are proposing. there's all sorts of this stuff instead of fixing the electorate count. we have to take a quick break. we'll be back. up next, the january 6th committee revealed some shocking new text messages from mark meadows that were sent during the capitol insurrection, and put new attention on donald trump's inaction to stop the riot. one of the two republicans, just two republicans on that committee, joins us next, adam kinzinger. want more from your vitamins? at nature's bounty, we give you more. more immune support. with the only vitamin c that lasts 24 hours. more restful sleep. with the first-ever triple action sleep supplement. we put more of our brains into helping your heart.
we give you more wellness solutions backed by rigorous science than we ever have before. nature's bounty gives you more, so you can live bountifully. ♪ ♪ ♪ (sha bop sha bop) ♪ ♪ are the stars out tonight? (sha bop sha bop) ♪ ♪ ♪ alexa, play our favorite song again. ok. ♪ i only have eyes for you ♪ is alright. y'all know when they say your home is a reflection of you? well helene found herself in a lamp.
no joke. i got a fancy grown up lamp to make me feel like a fancy grown up. mhm. adulting ain't easy. ooh! check this one out. waffles loves her dog bed. we can hardly get her out of it. she's kind of a diva. yes, waffles! living your best life. [woof] i'm telling y'all there's no place like wayfair to make your home totally you. ooh! i want that. ♪ ♪ wow, we're crunching tons of polygons here! what's going on? where's regina? hi, i'm ladonna. i invest in invesco qqq, a fund that gives me access to the nasdaq-100 innovations, like real time cgi. okay... yeah... oh. don't worry i got it! become an agent of innovation with invesco qqq kim is now demonstrating her congestion. save it slimeball. yeah... oh. don't worry i got it!
i've upgraded to mucinex. we still have 12 hours to australia. mucinex lasts 12 hours, so i'm good. now move! kim, no! mucinex lasts 3x longer for 12 hours. as the violence continued, one of the president's sons texted mr. meadows, quote, he's got to condemn this [ bleep ] asap. donald trump jr. texted again and again, urging action by the president. quote, we need an oval office address. he has to lead now. it has gone too far, and gotten out of hand. >> that's congresswoman liz cheney reading text messages from donald trump jr. to chief of staff mark meadows written during the january 6th capitol insurrection. it's part of a mounting body of evidence uncovered by the committee. joining us now, the only other
republican serving on the january 6th committee, congressman adam kinzinger. congressman, thank you for joining us. i want to ask you, those text messages were really unbelievably damning, and they were all turned over voluntarily by mark meadows before he decided to stop his cooperation with the committee. first of all, why do you think he turned them over, and do you think he had any idea how damaging all of that stuff was? did he know what he was giving you? >> well, first off, i think he turned them over because he knew he had to. it is the legal purview of the committee to request this, which is why we held him in contempt when he decided halfway into his cooperating he wasn't going to cooperate. not even on the non-privilege stuff. now he can go out and try to be a hero or whatever, and i'm not sure if he knew how damaging they were going to be, but it doesn't matter because he didn't have a choice. we have that legal authority to get that, and i think the
interesting thing, jonathan, about all of those texts and, you know, each one of them has their own kind of flavor of importance, but a lot of these texts were about a year ago. some even, you know, a little longer than a year ago. what has changed? i'll tell you what's changed since those texts were sent one year ago. probably a significant amount of more people believe that antifa or the fbi had something to do with january 6th. it's been a year and we haven't had any real, in essence, detailed accountability for what led to that, and that's what the committee is focused on. otherwise the history books, who knows what they're going to say because who will control the narrative? we just want the truth. >> also text messages, and i assume you have more, but the text messages that you released from your colleagues, from your republican colleagues on january 6th and as you said, before january 6th, that look pretty damning. do you think that some of your republican colleagues bear direct responsibility for that riot?
>> it's possible. i'm not ready to kind of go to that point yet because i want to let the facts dictate it, but i will tell you, yes. there are more texts out there that we haven't released, where it's, you know, folks not saying things like, hey, mark meadows. why don't you make sure all the votes are counted and then whoever has the most wins. it's going around the nuances of the law, or it's saying, here's how we can use this technicality to win, and i think that's why i think we have to look at the electoral count act and say, if there are people that know the technicality of this, and how to win against the will of the people, something is wrong and we have to change that. we're going to pursue doggedly, everything to the ends of the earth, and that includes members of congress had any involvement. >> i know no decision on this has been made, so i'm asking your opinion to be clear. do you think your colleagues,
some of your colleagues should be subpoenaed if they won't do it voluntarily, should be subpoenaed to testify before the committee? >> yeah, absolutely, and i don't -- the question is house rules and speech and debate and all those nuances, but yes. i think if you had anything to do with what happened on january 6th and i think more importantly, even on january 6th, is the events and the nuances that led to january 6th. >> right. >> because january 6th was a really bad day. everything prior to that is the rot in the democracy or the rot in self-governance that we have to correct so we don't get another january 6th. so absolutely anybody -- nobody, member of congress, former president, nobody in america is above the law. >> so a subpoena for former president trump? i know the committee hasn't made a decision, but you think that should happen? >> here's how i'll say it. if we need it, yes. nobody should be above the law, but we also recognize we can get the information without him at this point, and obviously when you subpoena the former president, that comes with a whole kind of, you know, circus
environment, but if we have to, we'll do it. >> right, right. that gives him a big platform. let me showcase something else that liz cheney said about the importance of meadows testifying. take a listen. >> mr. meadows' testimony will bear on another key question before this committee. did donald trump through action or inaction corruptly seek to obstruct or impede congress' official proceedings to count electoral votes? >> okay. so i know congress doesn't have the power to prosecute. that's the justice department, but what congresswoman cheney just described there is a crime under the u.s. criminal code. it is a crime to obstruct the official proceedings of congress. is she there sending a message, and are you sending a message that the justice department should be prosecuting not just
can those that broke into the building on january 6th, but should be prosecuting donald trump himself or at least investigating that possibility? >> i think investigating that possibility for sure, you know, congress has i think in this case our committee is getting more information than law enforcement agencies and doj, because we have had the power and the ability to get that done, and so whatever information we get will be public record and the doj should take a look. particularly if there's criminal charges to be filed, because again, the big thing is, as bad as it was on january 6th, there's really nothing in place to stop another one from happening again, and if somebody broke the law, it is so essential that we send the message that you are not untouchable as president. you're not untouchable as a former president, so just go and do your job honorably, and i think that's the only way that self-governance survives in the future. >> it was interesting to hear senator mcconnell this week. he obviously opposed an independent commission to
investigate all of this, but he seems to be -- i mean, almost cheering on the committee, at least by the way mcconnell speaks. take a listen to what he had to say about the committee's work. >> we're all going to be watching it. it was a horrendous event, and i think that what they're seeking to find out is something the public needs to know. >> that's not exactly what kevin mccarthy, the leader over there in the house is saying. >> right. look. i mean, i got to tell you, so, you know, say what you want about mitch mcconnell. he obviously holds his cards very close. i think that was a very powerful statement and i appreciate it. kevin mccarthy, on the other hand, has not said a word about anything, except for that donald trump is probably the greatest president to ever exist, and kevin mccarthy himself i think made donald trump relevant again when two weeks after january 6th or so, he went back down to mar-a-lago and brought him back to political life by putting his arm around him, taking that picture, and basically sending the signal to the rest of the republicans that were pretty quiet at this moment, that we got to get back on the trump
train, and he bears responsibility for that. i don't think history books are going to be kind to him. >> okay, we're almost out of time, but one more question. you won a big decision, the committee did, the appeals court, d.c. circuit on that executive privilege case to get all those white house documents that are housed in the national archives. the committee gave trump 14 days -- the court gave trump 14 days to appeal. that 14th day i think is christmas eve. do you expect the supreme court is going to take that up, and do you think you're going to get those documents? >> i think it's possible the supreme court could pick it up because it's so important, but i hope for an expedited ruling, and i do believe we'll see that documentation. it's the american people's documents. it's not donald trump's, and the courts made that very clear. >> how important are they, those documents? >> they're -- i think they're going to be really important. i think we're getting information regardless if we don't get them, but obviously that's going to be important. there's a lot of visitors logs,
et cetera, that we need to see. >> okay, congressman adam kinzinger of illinois, member of the january 6th committee, thank you for joining us. appreciate it. >> of course, thank you. you bet. the roundtable is going to weigh in on this next, and later, fivethirtyeight's nate silver takes on the latest threat to the democrats' house majority. stay with us. on the latest threat to the democrats' house majority. stay with us. s' house majority. stay with us. clients know wesher investmer have their backs. (other money manager) how do your clients know that? (naj) because as a fiduciary, it's our responsibility to always put clients first. (other money manager) so you do it because you have to? (naj) no, we do it because it's the right thing to do. we help clients enjoy a comfortable retirement. (other money manager) sounds like a big responsibility. (naj) one that we don't take lightly. it's why our fees are structured so we do better when our clients do better. fisher investments is clearly different. new vicks convenience pack. dayquil severe for you... and daily vicks super c for me. vicks super c is a daily supplement with vitamin c and b vitamins to help energize and replenish. dayquil severe is a max strength daytime, coughing,
power through your day, medicine. new from vicks. do you struggle with occasional nerve aches in your hands or feet? try nervivenerve relief from the world's #1 selling nerve care company. nervive contains alpha lipoic acid to relieve occasional nerve aches, weakness and discomfort. try nervivenerve relief. ♪ it starts with a mother's determination to treat her baby's eczema. and grows into a family business that helps thousands more. it starts with an army vet's dream of studying the stars. and grows into a new career as an astrophysicist. it starts with an engineer's desire to start over. and grows into an award-winning restaurant that creates local jobs. they learned how on youtube.
what will you learn? ordinary tissues burn when theo blows. so dad bought puffs plus lotion, and rescued his nose. with up to 50% more lotion puffs bring soothing softness and relief. n deserves puffs indeed. tums vs. mozzarella stick when heartburn hits, fight back fast with tums chewy bites. fast heartburn relief in every bite. crunchy outside, chewy inside. ♪ tums, tums, tums, tums ♪ tums chewy bites
roundtable is here for more. we'll be right back. table is h more. we'll be right back. today, business is a balancing act. you want your data to be protected and secured. and your customers want seamless and easy. with ibm, you can do both. your company can monl those, # # trustworthy ai powered security. that's why so many businesses work with ibm. you have always loved vicks vapors. and now you'll really love new vicks' vapostick.
it goes on clear and dries quickly. no mess. just the soothing vicks' vapor for the whole family. introducing new vicks vapostick. not only do centrum multigummies taste great. they help support your immune defenses, too. because a healthy life. starts with a healthy immune system. with vitamins c and d, and zinc. getting out there has never tasted so good. try centrum multigummies. (vo) welcome to hope, usa. ♪ it's a feeling that exists inside us all. and real places, where wells fargo and small businesses are working together to help bring hope. to the streets of our communities and beyond. ♪ when you have nausea, ♪ ♪ heartburn, ingestion, upset stomach... ♪
♪ diarrheaaaa.♪ try pepto bismol with a powerful coating action. for fast and soothing relief. pepto bismol for fast relief when you need it most. ♪ ♪ cases of anxiety in young adults are rising as experts warn of the effects on well-being caused by the pandemic. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ we gave new zzzquil pure zzzs restorative herbal sleep ♪ ♪ to people who were tired of being tired. i've never slept like this before. i've never woken up like this before. crafted with clinically studied plant-based ingredients that work naturally with your body. for restorative sleep like never before.
it's time that the it's time that the reign of criminals who are destroying our city, it is time for it to come to an end, and it comes to an end when we take the steps to be more aggressive with law enforcement, and less tolerant of all the [ bleep ] that has destroyed our city. san francisco mayor london breed who previously advocated reducing funding for her city's police department taking a fresh, hardline on crime. we'll get with that in a moment, but the roundtable, first, i want to start with january 6th, and rachel, you are as good as a student of mitch mcconnell as anybody. can you help interpret the comments that we just heard him say about the january 6th committee? >> the aboutface. >> he's very careful, and he said this a couple of times. he said it on capitol hill. he said it again in an interview back home. what's he doing here? >> i sort of have two theories
on this. one is that, you know, one of the reasons that mitch mcconnell did not want this outside commission on january 6th was because he worried that the results would come out in an election year and could actually hurt republicans, and the re-election when they tried to flip the senate. it could be perhaps that he's feeling so confident that they are going to flip the senate, you know, given where joe biden's poll numbers are, the status of the democratic party right now, that he doesn't see that as a threat anymore. the other option is, you know, we heard from folks close to him that he also had a concern that focusing on trump would only make him for powerful, make him more of a martyr with the base, keep him around longer, and that's the reason he wanted this to disappear, but it's clearly shown that trump's staying power is lasting. he's the number one person chosen in primaries and he's influencing folks on the right and so perhaps mitch mcconnell wants all the truth to come to light on this because he doesn't want trump in office again, and the more stuff that
comes out, perhaps it could hurt him in the long run. >> so, you know, bob, there's to a counterpoint from what rachel just said there, jonah goldberg had a column in the "l.a. times" suggesting that trump's power is actually waning and he cited a number of things including some of the senate candidates he's supported stumbling out of the gate. you mentioned something he didn't mention which is mcconnell. trump has made no credit he wants mcconnell to be dethroned ashe republican leader and ats going nowhere. is there -- i me could we finally be getting to the inwhere trump's power is actu waning? >> we're seeing mcco for example,n race, he has endorsed herschel walker, the trump favorite in that race, but as our reporting shows, he also privately despises president trump even
though publicly he has -- >> maybe even publicly if you go back to what he said after the the insurrection. >> he had a tough speech after the insurrection, but he did not vote to convict president trump in the senate trial, but he has privately -- mcconnell, called trump a fading brand, and off the track thoroughbred to use a kentucky term, and he would like to see trump expunged from the gop, but he knows trump isn't going anywhere. my read of his comments is really that's the personal mcconnell hoping -- and politically, hoping to see trump go away, but not exactly ready to kick him out the door, but if he could slowly nudge him out, that would be just fine. >> sarah, what do you make of the vastly different approaches to this between mccarthy and mcconnell? >> so look. mitch mcconnell, it's a huge difference in not wanting the commission to exist in the first place, but now that it exists, how you deal with that. a, trump is out there trying to get senate candidates to commit not supporting mitch mcconnell for senate leader if they take back the senate and so i think
this is mitch mcconnell saying, oh, okay, well, let's play ball then. let's see what happened on january 6th. another problem that frankly mccarthy and mcconnell are going to have, and mcconnell is just the more strategic player in all of this, is there's about to be a lot of republican primaries where some trump-endorsed candidates are going to lose, and if then they claim those elections are stolen and there will be a republican fight that is going to be relitigating in some ways 2020 where the election being stolen won't make a lot of sense in a lot of places. so i think mcconnell is setting the groundwork for that as well, and saying, no. our elections are fair. there is no lie, and so the republican primaries are going to move forward as well. >> meanwhile, yvette, you have this effort, actually this pretty strategic effort by trump to go after the people that stood up against him in challenging the election. >> mm-hmm. >> in 2020, not just the members of congress that voted to impeach him, but these
officials, people like brad raffensperger and people repeating the lies about the election. >> retribution is classically trump, and it's his m.o. and his thing, and we're not surprised and i think part of that is his -- showing his dominance and saying i'm still a player here, and if you come against me, i will come against you. that's the challenge mcconnell is having. he has to pull his party back to some semblance of sanity because it's a mess right now, and he knows at the end of the day, as more evidence comes out we'll see more people at the top levels being carted off probably to prison for their role in an insurrection, and assault and murder of police officers on our capitol. trump is going to be trump and going to be trump. mcconnell has to hold a line and figure out what he's going to do as trump continues to do what he does. >> i think one of the challenges that the panel and mitch mcconnell has if this committee turns up something that could
damage trump is that the narrative has already set, you know, you have people on both sides of the aisle they're not going to change their minds. half of the republican base believes that trump was actually the real winner in 2020, and a huge chunk of the party thinks it was a protest, falsely of course, but the issue the committee has is this is set, and we're going to be about a year and a half after january 6th by the time they start having these high-profile public hearings. the public has already gone through two impeachments. they're tired. they don't want to talk about this or follow it anymore, and they have a real challenge if they're turning up things, can they really change minds? >> the question i have, is when does the doj get involved and do they? >> that was the question. it seems it was being outlined. all the prosecutions have been in the equivalent in the drug deal in the park, but not the kingpin that was orchestrating it all. bob, on the committee and whether or not they can move the
needle, there is something different here than the impeachments. you're going to have actual witnesses, potentially in primetime. they've had more time to investigate. could this move the needle? >> many things could move the needle and we don't know the full scope this committee is uncovering in interviews, and documents they're able to now review and use as part of their investigation, and let's not forget to the department of justice's point, merrick garland, the attorney general has convened a grand jury. that grand jury issued the criminal indictment on steve bannon's refusal to comply with a congressional subpoena, so we have a doj component of this. we have a congressional committee that's aggressive getting new text messages, and the other thing we have to think about is who else is cooperating that we don't really know? in watergate, it was always about john dean breaking it open in 1973, 1974. i wonder about gina haspel, the former cia director. for example in our book, she privately worried about a, quote, right wing coup during the transition.
>> there's a lot -- there are 300 witnesses. we know just a tiny fraction of what they've done. we're almost out of time. i want to ask you, yvette. what do you make of the mayor of san francisco? >> how much time do i have? it's a tough situation. ooze a former city leader myself, i know the pressure she's under. the increasing crime, she's got to respond, and often this rhetoric around tough on crime is the first tactic. i don't think it's the right strategy because at the end of the day, it's not going to change things. san francisco has been under the weight of poverty, homelessness, and addiction for a long time, and the pandemic exacerbated that, and i don't think this is about resources because san francisco police still get $700 million a year. we have to focus on root causes and not this tough on crime rhetoric. >> we are out of time. coming up, nate silver on one factor that may give republicans a big advantage going into the 2022 midterm election, or will it? 2022 midt election.
people everywhere living with type 2 diabetes are waking up to what's possible... ...with rybelsus®. (♪ ♪) rybelsus® works differently than any other diabetes pill to lower blood sugar... in all 3 of these ways... increases insulin when you need it... decreases sugar... and slows food. the majority of people taking rybelsus® lowered their blood sugar and reached an a1c of less than 7. people taking rybelsus® lost up to 8 pounds. rybelsus® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. don't take rybelsus® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. stop rybelsus® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction. serious side effects may include pancreatitis.
tell your provider about vision problems or changes. taking rybelsus® with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases low blood sugar risk. side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration which may worsen kidney problems. wake up to what's possible with rybelsus®. (♪ ♪) you may pay as little as $10 per prescription. ask your healthcare provider about rybelsus® today. o man, that's a whole lot of wrinkly at least my shoes look good! looking good start with bounce wrinkleguard, the megasheet designed to prevent wrinkles in the dryer. i'm 53, but in my mind i'm still 35. that's why i take oste bi-flex to keep me moving the way i was made to, it nourishes and strengthens my joints for the long term. osteo bi-flex, plus vitamin d
for immune support. this is the planning effect. if you ask suzie about the future, she'll say she's got goals. and since she's got goals, she might need help reaching them, and so she'll get some help from fidelity, and at fidelity, someone will help her create a plan for all her goals, which means suzie will be feeling so good about that plan, she can just enjoy right now. that's the planning effect, from fidelity. frequent heartburn? not anymore. the prilosec otc two-week s challenget enjoy right now. is helping people love what they love again. just one pill a day. 24 hours. zero heartburn. because life starts when heartburn stops. take the challenge at prilosecotc dot com.
clerk: hello, how can i? sore throat pain? ♪honey lemon♪ try vicks vapocool drops. in honey lemon chill. for fast-acting sore throat relief. wooo vaporize sore throat pain with vicks vapocool drops. ♪ ♪ ♪ this is an action we must take to prevent the government from defaulting. i have no objections whatsoever in doing so. oing so.
what has come of it in just one year. if we are given the trust to be the majority, we will tackle inflation, we will secure our border, we will bring gasoline prices down, and we'll focus on the economy. >> in 2020, we won as a unified, democratic party. more unified than ever. we're going to win in 2022. >> as the parties look ahead to the 2022 midterms, about half the states have completed a once-in-a-decade redrawing of congressional redistrict maps. so, how are the new congressional boundaries shaping up, and which party appears to have the upper hand? the answer might surprise you. here's fivethirtyeight's nate silver. >> this one's a little complicated, but let's break it down. the last time this occurred after democrats were routed in the 2010 midterms, it was a disaster for the party. republicans grew boundary lines of 55% of districts, while
democrats controlled 10%. the rest were under strict control or used by partisan commissions. this time republicans also have an edge, but it's narrower. they control around 45% of districts, while democrats control around 20%. relative to 2010, democrats don't have it so bad as you check out our redistricting tracker. so far, according to our analysis, democrats have gained a net of four seats to republicans compared to the placement last year. both are showing up at districts of competitive seats. some states have yet to complete their process in new york and georgia for example. relative to nonpartisan standard, democrats still suffer from the redistricting process, partly because it's the control of districts with independent commissions in california and colorado that they could have otherwise have gerrymandered. perhaps costing them about a dozen seats. they could add four competitive seats that were usually safely blue. now to be clear, i think democrats are underdogs to keep the house. they have now fallen behind republicans in polls of
voter preferences for congress, but overall i don't really buy the redistricting story. here it makes it harder for democrats, but it's not that lopsided. the party's bigger problem next year is they'll wind up with fewer votes. >> our thanks to nate silver. we'll be covering the midterms every step of the way. that's all for today. thank you for sharing part of your sunday with us. check out "world news tonight," and have a good day. sunday wit. check out "world news tonight," and have a good day.
nespresso vertuo. redifining coffee. with one touch. precision brewing technology. a smooth crema. for an exceptional coffee every day. nespresso vertuo. what coffee is meant to be. ♪five bread-sticks.♪ ♪for my triple treat.♪ ♪three layers deep.♪ ♪10 cinnabon mini rolls to eat.♪ ♪and a pizza plus another pizza.♪
the triple treat box, only from pizza hut. there are two kinds of folks who sit around thinking about how to kill people--psychopaths and mystery writers. i'm the kind that pays better. who am i? i'm rick castle. castle. castle. i really am ruggedly handsome, aren't i? every writer needs inspiration, and i've found mine. i'm detective kate beckett. beckett. aah! beckett? could you get some backup, please? and thanks to my friendship with the mayor, i get to be on her case. oh! do i look like a killer to you? yes, you kill my patience. and together, we catch killers. i hate this case. i know. isn't it great? ephraim mankofsky, or simply mank, as he liked to be called, lived a fruitful life. a proud father of ten wonderful children... mank was so very, very blessed. (grunting) ah! (gasping)
IN COLLECTIONSKGO (ABC) Television Archive Television Archive News Search Service The Chin Grimes TV News Archive
Uploaded by TV Archive on