tv The David Rubenstein Show Peer to Peer Conversations PBS November 18, 2022 11:00pm-11:31pm PST
announcer: support for the pbs presentation of this program was provided by general motors. ♪ singer: ♪ yeah ♪ ♪ this is my kitchen table and also my filing system. david, voice-over: over much of the past 3 decades, i've been an investor. david: the highest calling of mankind, i've often thought, was private equity. [laughter] david, voice-over: and then i started interviewing. i watch your interview because i know how to do some interviewing. david, voice-over: i've learned in doing my interviews how leaders make it to the top. i asked him how much he wanted. he said, "250."
i said, "fine." i didn't negotiate with him. i did no due diligence. i have something i'd like to sell. david, voice-over: and how they stay there. you don't feel inadequate now because being only the second wealthiest man in the world, is that right? [laughter] one of the most influential figures in the world of philanthropy is darren walker. he currently heads the ford foundation and has revolutionized its giving. he also is an influential figure in the world of culture and arts. i had a chance to sit down with him recently to talk about how he rose from very modest circumstances in texas to become such a leading figure in the worlds ofhilanthropy, culture, and art. you're one of the most important people in the world of philanthropy, but tell us how has the world of philanthropy changed because of covid? darren: well, i'm not sure i agree that i'm the most important. i think i am part of a constellation of people who are lucky enough to lead undations like ford or rockefeller, macarthur, any of the great legacies. but covid has absolutely
impacted how we do our work, both internationally and domestically. let's start with internationally. the reality of this moment is that we are seeing tremendous inequality in the ways in which vaccines are being distributed, the ways in which they're being manufactured, and the issues around cost, intellectual property, which are profound and are having a tremendous negative impact, especially for people in africa and much of the global south. in the united states, we know that covid has meant that communities that are historically the most vulnerable are doubly impacted because of covid, and so, what that has meant for philanthropy is that we've had to double down in some ways and also recognize that in the united states the covid moment has coincided with the george floyd racial reckoning moment
and that has brought into stark relief the challenges for people of color, especially in low-income communities. david: ok, let's talk about the ford foundation and something you've done that's innovative to deal with covid. so, when covid came, you convinced the ford foundation trustees, and some others we'll lk about, to borrow money. you went out and borrowed a billion dollars. why did you need to do that? darren: well, we needed to do that because as you recall, at the beginning of covid, back in march and april of 2020, the markets were very choppy. and what i was concerned about was on the one hand, on the need side, we were hearing from many arts organizations, organizations working on food security and direct services, that they were in huge distress. remember, arts organizations had closed their doors. there was no revenue. the nonprofit fundraisers had been canceled. donors were beginning to get a little nervous about pledges. so, we would see the need to increase our spending
while at the same time, our denominator, our endowment was going down in value. and i'd seen that happen in the last down market cycle, where the need went up and our endowment went down. so, in order to really address the need side while maintaining, i think, good fiscal responsibility of managing the endowment, and, of course, because of the luck of having jerome powell in charge of the fed and basically announcing in the middle of march that money was free, i mean, basically, and what happened with the yield curve made it really quite possible for us to think about debt as opposed to taking money out of the endowment. and so, it was really just a matter of arbitrage, and so. david: was it hard to convince your trustees to do that? darren: initially, they thought it was out of the box, of course, because no foundation had done that before, but once, especially the investment committee
started to think about the options, it became clear that it was the best option. david: were you able to get other large foundations to do the same in terms of borrowing money? darren: there were a number of foundations who have done this. macarthur, kellogg, doris duke, and we now have probably 8 or 10 who have issued bonds, but the bigger message was that we needed to do more than simply going by the irs minimum of 5% payout. in the time of covid, at a time, ultimately, when we had more money than ever, it simply was not morally defensible to spend 5%. david: so, let's talk about george floyd. you mentioned him earlier. you've lived through the civil rights revolution in the sixties and we have the post-civil rights efforts in the seventies and eighties, but it seems as if not until george floyd was murdered did some people in the corporate world and the government take seriously the discrimination and other challenges that african americans faced. is it that your perception that george floyd had an incredible impact, more than you might have thought
one murder might have had? darren: well, i think what was different, david, was that first, we were all at home as a country, and secondly, this was fully videotaped from the moment he was put on the ground till his last breath and that it was photographed, that it was videotaped, and that the perpetrator was fully aware that he was killing someone and clearly assumed that he could do that with impunity. i think that is what we americans, the average american found so appalling and so antithetical to our values as a people. and so, it had a huge impact far beyond the issue of policing and civil rights to the boardroom.
david: you think it will be enduring. in other words, the boardroom now, there's a big effort to have more african americans and more women on boards, but do you think that will last or is it just for a short period of time after the george floyd murder? darren: well, there's no doubt that some of the rhetoric from some ceos was performative. but i believe that we are seeing a real paradigm shift where we understand that diversity in the boardroom is more than one. you know, i'm a member of some public company boards and there was a time when there would be one black and one hispanic and that-- and maybe one or two white women and you had diversity. i think now we understand that that's really tokenism. diversity is fully embracing the idea of the intersection of talent and representation and that you can get both. david: do you think discrimination against african americans is greater than discrimination against people who are gay? darren: i think that race is a very challenging
feature of american life and when you look at the progress of lgbt, when you think about something like marriage equality, which polled in the low double digits as recently as 15 years ago and now a majority of americans support, i think part of the reason for the progress was because most americans, most white americans could relate. they could relate to ellen degeneres coming out on abc, on national tv, because she s the girl next door that they'd fallen in love with for 5 seasons. they could relate to some of the people who were on the front lines, leading the efforts and the marches. they knew that the young people were their children and grandchildren. it is harder on the issue of race and it's because in this country,
we have a difficult history. i love the united states of america because i know that there is no country in the world where my story would be possible. i revere the founding fathers in spite of their flaws because they made it possible to actually fix the problems they didn't have the courage or the will to, and so, i believe that we have to deal with that fundamental history, the contradictions and complexity of this country. david: let's talk about how you became the head of the ford foundation and your background. so, you're not from new york city, is that right? darren: i am definitely not from new york city. i was born in a charity hospital in crowley, louisiana, a little town, not far, i guess, from lafayette and baton rouge. david: and you were raised by a single mother.
darren: yeah, i was. david: and you grew up in texas more than louisiana. darren: yeah, we moved to ames, texas when i was a little boy. david: and you went to university of texas. darren: i did indeed. i'm proud to say, david, that i have never attended a day of private education in my life, from head start through law school. public education was the path. david: so, you went to university of texas. how did you do there? darren: i did ok. david: were you elected president of the student government or something? darren: i was the head of a number of organizations and i was very lucky because i lived at a time in this country when i knew in spite of the challenges that i faced as a boy, as a young man, that my country was cheering me on. i never for a moment felt that my dreams and aspirations could not be achieved and i never felt
that america didn't want anything for me but success. and so, yes, i had a great run in college and law school that brought me to new york, but the tailwinds were with me. david: but you must have suffered some discrimination in texas or louisiana as an african american. was it difficult or was it not? darren: of course, there were many occasions, countless occasions when i faced discrimination, i mean, or when i faced people saying things to me that were heartless and harmful and difficult to hear. i mean, i recall in high school when i won an election for student council and the person i--or a friend of the person who lost to me told me that no matter how successful i might be in the future, going off to the university of texas, etc., that the most successful black man in america
would always be below the least successful white man in america. so, i was told this when i was 16. imagine hearing that, but also, who taught a 16-year-old that idea? and so, i think about that when you ask questions like this, you know, did you face-- sure i did. but what i actually worry about is that that kind of thinking is instantiated in some segments of our society, which is so harmful to our democracy. david: so, you graduated from the university of texas law school, and rather than stay in texas, you headed to new york, and you went to a very, very famous law firm, cleary gottlieb, and did you want to be a great corporate law rtner? what did you want to be? darren: no, i didn't want to be. what i wanted not to be ever again was poor. i did not want to be poor, and when you grow up
on the precipice of an economic collapse of your own family, it leaves you, it leaves an indelible mark. when you are a kid and you're waiting for your mother to pick you up at school after a debate tournament and she never turns up and you walk home and you find out it's because her car was repossessed, that leaves a profound mark on your psyche. and so, to be mpletely candid, i didn't want to be poor, and i didn't choose a career path to wall street because i loved the law, or when i left to go to ubs because i loved asset-backed collateral. i liked the idea of some semblance of financial security for me and my family. david: all right, so, you made some money at cleary gottlieb and then you went to ubs. you were in the financial services world,
as it's now called, but then you left to go work in a nonprofit in harlem. why did you do that? darren: because for me, it was never about piling up money. for me, it was ultimately about service. david: all right, so, you did that for a number of years and then you joined the rockefeller foundation. then you rose up to be in charge of various international programs. then you were recruited to go to the ford foundation. darren: i went to ford as a vice president. ford was a much larger foundation. it's about 3 times the size of rockefeller. so, it was a lateral move but i had a bigger remit. david: ok, so, ford was looking for a new president and you were one of the candidates, and as i understand it, you went into the interview and said, "i'm gonna change this completely if i get this job. "i'm gonna focus on social inequality and make everything dealing with social inequality our focus." is that right? darren: yes, but what i said was the foundation was too disparately organized and that we had lost our focus
and that we needed a single north star for our work, which we did not have and had really never had. david: so, when you got the position, all of a sudden, ford announced guess what, we're gonna focus only on inequality and so forth. what did your typical recipients of your aid say? darren: well, a part of it is just stepping back and asking why did we focus on inequality, and the reason i believed inequality was important was because of our mission. a part of our mission as established by henry ford the second was to strengthen democracy and democratic practice in the u.s. and abroad. i believe that among the greatest threats to our democracy is growing hopelessness, and hopelessness occurs in societies where there are high lev-- is high level of inequality. and so, the correlation of inequality and hopelessness
is what is a threat to our mission. and so, the goal was to get people to understand no matter what you're working on, if it is having some impact on poor people because of the growing inequality in the world. david: ok. it's one thing, though, you get the job, you convince the board to do this, but then you have to do the work of convincing your staff people to actually change what they've been doing for so many years, and was that hard to do? darren: it was not without difficulty. it was not without some long-term employees leaving the foundation. it was not without some long-term grant organizations leaving the or--leaving the foundation. david: did you feel you needed security for-- darren: well, no, it's-- i mean, david, the role of foundation leader like me is one of great privilege, and i say that with all humility because this is not about me as a person. this is about the job i hold.
i am under no fantasy or misunderstanding of why, as you say, i may be in demand. i'm not in demand because darren walker is that interesting of a person. i'm in demand becausm president of the ford foundation. and when i am no longer president of the ford foundation, i can assure you, i'll have more time to have dinner with you. david: you serve on a number of corporate boards. what is your view on whether ceos have a responsibility to their shareholders or to the public to give their views on important public policy issues? darren: well, there is no doubt that being a public company ceo today is one of the hardest jobs in america. along with being president of a university, there's no harder job. i do think that this move that the business roundtable has started to advance away from shareholder capitalism to a stakeholder capitalism is better.
it means that we won't be slavishly, singularly focused on the issue of shareholder value and the price of stock as the metric for success a company. doesn't mean that that has to be primary and important, but you have to take into consideration the needs and concerns of the other stakeholders, which often does come down on occasion to social issues, and i think it is hard to navigate that and each company has to make its own decisions, but my view on it is as corporate boards become more diverse, as the c-suite becomes more diverse, it's gonna be harder to ignore these kinds of social issues. david: do you have any interest in ever running for office or anything? darren: no. i'm not qualified, temperamentally or otherwise, to be in elective office. i admire our elected officials
and i admire the idea of public service and i regret that in our country, this idea of service seems to have been denigrated. as you know, the great families in this country in the 20th century, the idea of service, bob morgenthau served. he believed in this idea of public service as the highest and most noble calling in a democracy. we have lost that in our country and i think this is deeply regrettable. david: so, in the united states, in the early part of the 20th century, and then, in the mid-part of the 20th century, wealthy people like john d. rockefeller or henry ford set up foundations where they would take their stock or other assets and put it in the foundation, and then the foundation would be, to some extent, controlled for a while by families, but then eventually, the families would not be in control. in the ford foundation case, henry ford famously got off the foundation board many decades ago,
'cause he wasn't happy, it is said, with the ford foundation. now you've re-engaged the ford family. was that hard to do? darren: henry ford the second left the board in 1976 and it is true that he was happy about a lot of the work of the ford foundation, but he was unhappy. he was unhappy because the work that we did in the american south to advance integration and to support efforts to deem illegal discriminatory practices was a problem because southern dealers felt the displeasure of southern consumers. so, henry ford the second was hearing from ford motor company dealers that their consumers didn't want to buy our cars. so, he decided to leave. we have been independent of the ford family and ford motor company for over 6 decades. i believed that it was critically important for us to re-engage the ford family. this is where the money came from.
it was important to re-engage in the city of detroit and this is why we played a pivotal role in that bankruptcy. re-engaging with the ford family was easy. bill ford and his mother martha firestone ford are among the most amazing people i know, and they were happy to re-engage. and so, we, o years ago, elected henry ford the third, the grandson of henry ford the second, to our board. david: now, as i mentioned earlier, what happened is a lot of prominent people, when they get to be 60, 70, maybe 80, they would set up these foundations, but now a lot of people have gotten very wealthy in their thirties, forties, and fifties, and they don't set up these traditional foundations. they just kind of give away the money in different ways that's maybe not having a board like yours operate. is that the new model which is to say something like what's being done with, let's say, the jeff bezos fortune. he's giving away money. his former wife
is giving away money in different ways. is that a new model or do you think the traditional model, the ford foundation, rockefeller foundation, will stay as the model for large philanthropic foundations? darren: i think the model of philanthropy over many decades will continue to exist but the exciting thing about this moment is that there are new models, and you mentioned two really terrific ones, what jeff bezos is doing as well as mackenzie scott, what laurene powell jobs or the chan zuckerbergs are doing. all of these are part of a landscape of philanthropic pluralism, which we should celebrate. no country in the world has the diversity of ways of ving as we do in the united states. so, i celebrate every time a new foundation is created, in whatever form. david: let's suppose you're not a billionaire, but you're just an average person. why should you want to give away your money? you worked hard to get this money. why not just buy things that-- for you and your family? darren: well, first of all, some of the best philanthropists in this country are small donors.
they understand what it is like to work really hard and for many of them, they don't have a lot of disposable income, and yet they give. they give to their church, they give to their food pantry, they give to their homeless shelter, and that is because in this country, there is a civic imperative of the individual to do what he or she can to make a difference in improving our communities. so, i celebrate those small, impactful donors, but i also, though, worry that for many wealthy people, the idea of giving often is not driven by a sense of just making a difference but it's making a difference with strings attached.
it's making a difference but doing it the way i want it done rather than what the experts might say, and so, it's that calibration that concerns me. david: you and i serve on the national gallery of art board and every art institution i know of wants you to serve on their board. you're very involved in the art world. what is it about art that attracts you? darren: well, art is essential in a democracy, david. art is so important. we know what art does to young people. we know that exposure to art brings about higher levels of empathy. it helps people understand how other cultures, other people live, and it jt brings out the kind of humanity in all of us. there are times when i have observed leaders use language that is inhumane
while talking about other human beings, while talking about the world, and i think to myself this person has clearly never engaged in beautiful poetry. they've never listened to the words of a great playwright. they've never sat and reflected on a beautiful painting or a picture, because if they had been really educated, had they really been exposed to the arts, they wouldn't find it possible to use this kind of language when talking about other human beings. announcer: support for the pbs presentation of this program was provided by general motors.
>> the former attorney general who resigned and broke with president trump this week on "firing line." >> bill barr can go down as the greatest attorney general in the history of our country or he can go down as just another guy. >> "one damn thing after another" is the title of william barr's memoir and a fitting description of his time as trump's attorney general. barr was firmly in trump's camp when it came to denouncing the russia probe... >> i think that the government did not have a prosecutable case. >> ...and warning about the possibility of voter fraud before the 2020 election. >> elections that have been held with mail have found substantial fraud and coercion. >> but after trump lost, they had a stunning break. >> i made it clear i did not agree with the idea of saying the election was stolen. >> as the former president launches a new white house bid,
IN COLLECTIONSKQED (PBS) Television Archive Television Archive News Search Service
Uploaded by TV Archive on