tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC June 23, 2015 1:00am-2:01am PDT
>> unbelievable day of news, chris. >> flood gates. >> absolutely incredible. any time you start talking about something, by the time you get to the end of the sentence, it's changed. amazing. amazing show tonight, chris. >> thank you. >> thanks to you at home for staying with us for the next hour. as i say, there is a ton going on in the news tonight. a ton. we've got a big show for you including a lot of breaking news as far as we can tell. for starters though, please direct your attention to the highlighted squares on our chart of republican presidential contenders. we have news tonight about donald trump and bobby jindal and also carly fiorina at last. under the delightfully arbitrary rules of the fox news hosted first republican primary debate, it has seemed to be true that donald trump would qualify to appear on the debate stage at the first republican debate in august and carly fiorina would not qualify for that debate. fox news is apparently only going to take the top ten candidates in national polling.
mr. trump was clinging to tenth place in the national polls. and carly fiorina was on the wrong side of the cutoff. she was coming in at roughly 11th place before now. but in a new nbc poll out today carly fiorina has sent donald trump to the kids table at least in this one new national poll. carly fiorina now stands in. tenth place in national polling with a whopping 2% of republicans supporting her. and donald trump has 1%, so he's fired. this is just one poll. there's no way to tell if this is going to hold but these are your current top ten republican contenders according to the nbc/wall street poll that's out today. we have here one surgeon, three first-term senators, we have one arguably failed and definitely fired executive of a really big tech company in california, and we also have five people who are current or former governors of u.s. states.
so if you're looking for what type of candidate is really dominating the republican race right now it's the governors. former florida governor jeb bush of florida leading by five points in this new nbc/"wall street journal" poll. scott walker comes in second. overall, five of the top ten republicans in the current polling, five of the top ten are governors. it may not have been commander in chief of a nation but they have been in charge of a state. the thinking goes that people will be able to extrapolate from that. former texas governor rick perry said just the other day, if you want to run for president you should go home and try to run a state first. take that, ted cruz. presidents of course come from all kinds of jobs. but the governor's mansions of our nation do seem to produce a lot of them. governorships tend to be a fairly frequent incubator for presidential ambitions. that seems to be true heading into this election as much or more so as it has been for any other recent elections. it was also true heading into
the last presidential election of 2012. republicans ended up running the former governor of massachusetts as their presidential nominee in 2012. but ahead of that election at the time that everybody was starting to jump in to the republican race, republicans really did think very seriously about this guy instead, governor haley barbour of mississippi. long one of the great powers in the national republican party, governor of mississippi, head of the republican governors association, a legendary rain maker, just unparalleled republican fund fund-raiser, unbelievable popular within the party among other high level republican, chairman of course of the republican national committee at one point. in the lead up to 2010 haley barbour seemed like for the world he could be something big, he could be something epic. president barbour? that was the question in the conservative weekly standard
magazine in december 2010. quote, all year haley barbour has been deflecting questions about his presidential ambitions. president barbour? i mean, at the time it made sense. haley barbour, cultivated one of the great beltway power careers. he knew every republican at every level in republican politics. when he went home to mississippi he played on the national stage as rebuilder of that hurricane devastated mississippi coast. and with the republicans looking for someone to challenge president obama in 2012 president barbour seemed as likely an idea as anyone. so the weekly standard ran this more than glowing pro time of haley barbour. not just reveling in his high standing in the party and his power and his political experience, but in effect trying to reintroduce haley barbour to conservatives nationwide. basically giving the conservative fairytale of the haley barbour life story. they called it "the boy from yazoo city."
in haley barbour's hometown of yazoo city, mississippi, the schools there didn't integrate until 1970. but when the schools did integrate in yazoo city they did so relative peace, compared to the with the rest of mississippi. the magazine asked haley barbour in this profile, why that was. and this is what he said in response. he said, quote, because the business community wouldn't stand for it. you heard of the citizens council, up north they think it was like the kkk. where i come from it was an organization of town leaders. in yazoo city they passed a resolution that said anybody who started a chapter of the klan would get their [ bleep ] run out of town. if you had a job, you would lose it. if you had a store, nobody shopped there. we didn't have a problem with the klan in yazoo city. no problem where he came from, haley barbour said. the citizens councils took care of it. by citizens council what's haley barbour meant were the groups that we also call the white citizens councils, the white citizens councils were founded
after brown v. board, after the supreme court ordered the end of separate but equal in 1954, the end of segregation in this country in 1954. that's why they were founded, in response to brown v. board. the following year, right after that ruling, the citizens council published the first ever issue of their newspaper. racial law in america. the citizens' council's aim is, quote, to preserve separation of the races against the assaults from the national association for the advancement of colored people, quote, there's a rainbow of hope in the dark integration sky. citizens councils have sprung up to prevent this tranl difficult of being visited on the schools now and in the future we will exhaust every legal resource available in resisting the attempt of a marxist conscious supreme court to bring about mongralization of the white race by judicial ruling. citizens council also had this pamphlet summing up their reason for existence. the citizens council is the south's answer to the
mongrelizers. we are proud of our white blood and our white heritage. for a world of mongrelizers. when haley barbour thinking about running for president in 2010, when in that context he praised the old citizens councils, that is what he was talking about. >> i am -- also executive secretary of the citizens councils of alabama. we are dedicated to the preservation of segregation. >> we will segregate the buses. and if necessary, i shall arrest every agent of the federal government who attempts to conspire to put across integration of race. >> the entire negro movement in the united states was identified with the movement for africa nationalism in africa. this is a development of extreme
significance, i think, because it opens up the possibility for non-white domination of the united states. >> what direction is your movement going into in what do you see in the future? >> i see a political organization based on racial nationalism. >> a third party? >> a third party based on race. >> and you would lead it? >> based on race. based on the white race. citizens councils. there were whites citizens councils across the old confederacy. many up to, many states. in haley barbour's hometown of yazoo city, mississippi. they are ruled by fear. they left a vivid record for it. the white citizens council took out a full-page ad in the town's newspaper listing the signers by name. the citizens council posted those names all over town which terrified the people who dared to sign the petition as it was
intended to do. they reported this from the "time," many signers have been penalized by loss of employment. under pressure some have removed their names from the petition. j.h. wright, a plumbing contractor listed above, lost two construction jobs, was refused plumbing supplies by a wholesale house and his grocer told him a loaf of bread would now cost him $1. he plans to move elsewhere. people who were in favor of integrating the schools in yazoo city had to flee from yazoo city because of that nice citizens council which haley barbour praised for keeping the peace in his town in the civil rights era. they ran for their lives from the white citizens council. so when haley barbour described a peaceful past and historic record showed something far more horrifying, when the citizens councils turned out easily shown as really racist, haley barbour didn't seem so presidential anymore. i mean, in the end, his pull
quote from that profile ended up being his overall summing up what it was like to grow up smack-dab in the middle of the civil rights revolution. he told the weekly standard when he thought back on that time, quote, i just don't remember it being that bad. so, no, we never got a president haley barbour. we never got a haley barbour for president campaign. they did not survive much past his fond memories of the segregated south and praise of the white citizens councils at that time. by the time that happened to haley barbour, the white citizens councils had gone through a reincarnation. they became the council of conservative citizens. and despite their history, despite where they came from, despite who they still were in all but name some politicses found over time they couldn't keep away from them. yes, that's because some politicians are just flat out obvious racists. right?
former kkk grand wizard and louisiana legislator david duke. he spoke at a fund-raiser for the south carolina council for conservative citizens in 1995, but, yeah, he's david duke. but then congressman bob barr of georgia, he addressed the citizens council in 1998 after "the washington post" pointed out that bob barr has been hobnobbing with white supremacists. the congressman responded that he hadn't actually known it was that kind of group. in 1998 the citizens council finally got banned from cpac, from the conservative political action conference on the blunt grounds that cpac found that, quote, they are racists. and the white citizens council got banned from cpac in 1998. but senator trent lock by that point, senator trent lock of mississippi by then had been hanging out with citizens council for years. he got his picture taken with the guys in a private meeting in his office the year before they got banned by other conservatives from cpac for being racist. in 1999, democrats in congress
tried to shame republicans by forcing them to take a vote condemning the council of conservative citizens. that vote failed but some of the work of trying to embarrass republicans about supporting this group was done. conservative politicians have managed to get themselves embarrassed over and over and over again by associating themselves with this barely reconstituted, segregationist, racist white supremacist group. it's not like they're trying to hide anything, right? this is from their statement of principles. look. look at this. quote, we believe the united states is a european country and that americans are part of the european people. we oppose all efforts to mix the races of mankind to promote non-white races over the european-american people and to force the integration of the races. i mean, that is what crawled out of the carcass of the group that haley barbour praised when he was going to run for president but then it didn't work out. that's the council of conservative citizens.
over this weekend we learned that the shooter in charleston south carolina last week got his ideas from this council of conservative citizens. he credited them directly with inspiring his attempts to start a race war with this mass murder in charleston church. this group that had always been racist, that had always been part of the worst barbaric impulses in the modern history of our nation now in its new form has those same ideas all over the blood of nine african-americans in a church in the city of charleston. and while the group insists today that they do not support violence, they have also since the shootings stood up for the ideas that the shooter says filled his hade. they stood up for the content of his message. not for what he did but, yes, for why he says he did it. that was one thing we learned this week. while the nation and the city of charleston mourned those nine murder victims we learned the council of conservative citizens
was part of this story. other thing we learned is that republican politicians including some who are run for president now have been taking money, a lot of money, from that racist group. john swain of the guardian newspaper reporting this weekend that the group's leader has given ten of thousands of dollars to campaign contributions in support of ted cruz and rand paul and rick santorum and scott walker and texas governor greg abbott and arkansas senator tom cotton and on and on and on. and most of them reacted to that news today. reacted to that reported link to the inspiration for the charleston massacre. most of these politicians reacted to that news today like they had just been handed a live cottonmouth snake. one by one they've been giving the money back or giving it to a charity. in addition to what you see here we can tell you tonight that steve king, iowa congressman steve king, tells us he's sending back what he got to charleston and so is louie gomert. and according to "the washington
post," who are jeff flake and tom cotton. as we hear back from more people who have taken donations from the council of conservative citizen, we'll let you know. but we can tell you clearly that where republicans have stood by and for and in some cases with this racist group in the very recent past, after those murders in that charleston church, now as of today they're not standing by that group anymore. after decades, right? i mean that group was founded right after brown v. board. everybody knew who they were. and over and over and over again, for decades, conservative politicians still allied themselves with that group. even though everybody knew who they were, they had never hidden their light under a bush she'll. they've been an overtly racist group with ties to the terror that was the backlash against the civil rights movement in this country. they were the vanguard of the defense of segregation in this country. and for decades politicians have still associated themselves with this group. sometimes they get a little icky about it but it persists.
today it seems to have stopped. sometimes it takes a lot of time to get these things right. right? sometimes you grab the hot handle with your bare hand more than once. but when you finally drop that thing, turns out it lands with a tremendous clatter and we are at that profound place right now tonight in our country on the conservative citizens council, may the white citizens council on the confederate flag and a lot of other things that felt like they would never ever be gone from even our modern politics, right now our politicians are making a fascinating and a very hard turn. and the rest of that story is when we come back. shopping online... ...is as easy as it gets. wouldn't it be great... ...if hiring plumbers, carpenters and even piano tuners were just as simple? thanks to angie's list now it is. we've made hiring anyone from a handyman to a dog-walker as simple as a few clicks. buy their services directly at angieslist.com.
so it's not like it has been there forever. it's been there since 1962. i mean, not 1862 when the confederacy existed, right, and was raging war on the united states. it has not been there 1862. they put it up in 1962. in the early 1960s they put up the confederate flag in south carolina flying over the capitol dome during the civil rights movement of the 1960s. and because of the civil rights movement of the 1960s it was put up and basically -- politically it is clear from the context of
the time it was put up as symbol of resistance to desegregation in the early 1960s as south carolina and the rest of the deep south burned and marched and lit up with gunfire and bombings and beatings and intimidation and rage in that catalyzing and epic fight that we had as country to try to desegregate the south. south carolina state government made a decision to put up the confederate flag over its state capitol in 1962 basically as a way of saying that their state would not desegregate. but then after the civil rights era, after the segregation issue was settled, at least in polite company and civil rights side supposedly won, south carolina didn't take down the flag, they left it up over the capitol dome. for a very long time that was awkward and difficult for all the obvious reasons. and south carolina was not alone in the south in flying that flag but the fight there has been particularly loud and hard fought and particularly
tenacious in large part because the confederate flag has been great politics for conservative politicians who have used that issue and that symbol to court white voters in south carolina by supporting the confederate flag, by supporting symbols of the old confederacy. this weekend part of the outpouring of grief over the massacre of african-american church goers in charleston last week, part of the effort to grieve those victims and express a collective anguish about that crime, a collective revulsion of what happened at the mother emanuel church, part of that this weekend in a fairly impromptu way spilled over out of the formal vigils and church services into this gathering on a bridge in downtown charleston, this big beautiful modern bridge which is called the arthur ravenel bridge. this is arthur ravenel, republican senator from south carolina. his name is on that bridge. he is celebrated in south carolina for mispolitical bridge and his political career is best
remembered for his impassioned defense of the confederate flag continuing to fly at the state capitol in south carolina. see this picture there, see in the background, see a strange looking background for him at this rally? what that is a a massive confederate flag several stories tall laid out on the steps of the state house leading this rally in favor of the confederate flag in south carolina in 2007. it's easier to see in color. oh, right, that's the guy who is bridge is named after. and at the time this picture was taken, at the time the senator was leading this pro confederate rally in south carolina he was not just ginning up support for the flag and symbols of the confederacy he was reaping the political rewards for doing so. if you're a conservative politician in south carolina all of these years it has really helped to be a staunch defender of the confederate flag and it flying at the state capitol. who years before this rally in 1998 south carolina voted out an incumbent republican gov more
named david beasley after governor beasley said he wanted to remove the confederate flag from the state capitol grounds. after he said that he lost his seat. they threw him out of office over that. in 1994 the state legislature tried to get over the confederate flag over the capitol. it failed in. in 1995 they tried again, it failed. in 1998, they tried again. it had been bad politics. it has been bad politics for white conservative politicians to be against the confederate flag in that state. it has been good politics for conservative politicians to be for the confederate flag. and that dynamic has been boulsterd by the fact that south carolina has this peculiar national political position as one of the early voting presidential states. south carolina first in the south. right? it's iowa, new hampshire, south carolina. after that republican governor got turfed out in south carolina in 1998 as the naacp was coordinating a big economic
boycott of south carolina over them fly that confederate flag, as state senator arthur ravenel was holding a rally in front of a 100 foot tall confederate flag. in the year 2000 george w. bush and john mccain were battling it out in south carolina to try to win the republican nomination for president. and so they very knowingly strolled right up to this rube con, right? would supporting the confederate flag remain just a political asset for south carolina conservatives or would it become a national conservative cause, too? john mccain in that heming and hawing way tried to refuse what he thought about the issue but at the same time played to the issues of politics when he was asked about south carolina's confederate flag, he made sure to reference his own role in opposing the martin luther king holiday being recognized in arizona. he then went on to say the issue of the confederate flag was a
state's right issue for south carolina. who is he to tell south carolina they ought to take that confederate flag down? >> if i were a south carolinian i would make a choice. in arizona, we had a big fight over the martin luther king holiday. i didn't like it when people came in and told us what to do in arizona when -- about the martin luther king holiday. >> you've weighed in on other state issues in the past. >> on this issue i have not weighed in. this issue is not going to be helped by me weighing in on it. >> you said in the past when you were asked it on "night line" if you were president what would say and you claim that bill clinton had not told the people of south carolina what to do but yesterday in boston president clinton said he thought the flag should be taken down. given that -- >> i understand that he would say that and i appreciate that. my view is that i think that the people of south carolina are best qualified to make the decision. >> john mccain speaking in january 2000 in the midst of that mighty battle for the presidential nomination,
particularly the south carolina primary coming up in the republican presidential nominating race. he was fighting it out with george w. bush for that nomination, particularly to try to win that primary. george w. bush took basically the same line as john mccain on the issue. who am i to tell south carolina they ought to take that confederate flag down? because george w. bush, we forget now, was a very, very good politician, although he took the same line as john mccain did, he sounded way better when he did it. >> as an american citizen, do you have a visceral reaction to seeing the confederate flag? >> as an american citizen i trust the people of south carolina to make the decision for south carolina. >> cheers, cheers. for no one telling south carolina to take down that confederate flag. not long after he lost the south carolina primary to george w. bush, then he dropped out of the
race, and south carolina ultimately decided to take the confederate flag off the state capitol dome and move it instead to frankly a more prominent place, confederate memorial in front of the state house right on a main drag that you drive-thru in columbia, right after that, after they moved the flag to the different part of the state capitol grounds, john mccain said he shouldn't have did what he did there. he said he was ashamed of himself for how he tried to play that issue in south carolina. he basically said he was pandering for folks and he didn't really believe that south carolina should keep flying that flag but he didn't feel comfortable saying so during the campaign. once george w. bush served his two terms as president and john mccain was once again running to try to win the republican party's presidential nomination his rivals in 2008 primaries used john mccain's contrition on the confederate flag, him going soft on the confederate flag, they used it against him in 2008 presidential race. >>out don't like people from outside the state coming and
telling you how you ought to raise your kids. you don't like people from outside the state coming down and telling you what to do with your flag. in fact, if somebody came to arkansas and told us what to do with our flag, we would tell them where to put the pole. that's which we would do. >> mike huckabee running in 2008 saying south carolina should vote for him and not john mccain because he would never criticize the confederate flag flying at that state capitol. not like some. that was 2008. now after the charleston massacre, after the confessed shooter posted his start a race war online and posted all of those myriad photos of himself with the confederate flag, after all those years in south carolina fighting against the confederate flag being flown at the state house, after all those years conservative politicians in the state and conservative politicians from around the country supporting the confederate flag in order to get white people in south carolina to vote for them, after all of these years this massacre finally started to crack the dam and you could see it start to
break with old mike huckabee himself. >> for those of us running for president, everyone is being baited with this question as if somehow that has anything to the whatsoever with run for president. and my position is, it most certainly does not. >> says the man who last time he ran for president ran in south carolina on not just supporting the confederate flag flying at the capitol but also suggesting what people could do with the flagpole if they disagreed. now he finds the subject inappropriate for comment by a presidential candidate. see, you can see the dam breaking on this issue. in the person of old mike huckabee trying once again to find political advantage on this issue but now he doesn't know where to find it. you can see the dam breaking when other flags -- the other flag on the state capitol grounds in south carolina, the american flag, the south carolina flag, they were lowered to half staff in the wake of the charleston massacre last week while that confederate battle flag stayed at full staff on the capitol grounds.
maybe that's when the dam actually started to break. after 50 years of not just fighting about that flag but conservative politicians statewide and nationwide banking on the conservative flag in order to -- on the confederate flag in order to get votes from white people who like it in south carolina, after decades of that finally today the dam broke. one of the politicians who was there when that happened joins us next. when you ache and haven't slept... you're not you. tylenol® pm relieves pain and helps you fall fast asleep and stay asleep. we give you a better night. you're a better you all day. tylenol®.
carolina came together in a bipartisan way to move the flag from atop the capitol dome. today we are here in a moment of unity in our state without ill will to say, it's time to move the flag from the capitol grounds. we are not going to allow this symbol to divide us any longer. the fact that people are choosing to use it as a sign of hate is something that we cannot stand. the fact that it causes pain to so many is enough to move it from the capitol grounds. it is, after all, a capitol that belongs to all of us. july 4th is just around the corner. soon we will once again celebrate the bit of our nation and of our freedoms. it will be fitting that our state capitol will soon fly the flags of our country and of our state and no others. god bless, god bless the people of the great state of south carolina. thank you. >> south carolina governor nikki haley coming out today for the first time in her career, first
time in her life saying that the confederate battle flag has to come down from the grounds of the state capitol in south carolina. this excuse me. this is the second time i've ever sneezed live on television. excuse me. look on the right side of your screen there you can see she's got both of the state's u.s. senators. immediately to her left, so just to the right of her on the screen, you see u.s. senator tim scott and then to his left further to the right of your screen you see lindsey graham, u.s. senator, candidate for president this year. neither of them have ever previously criticized the confederate flag but today both of them came out and said it should come down at the state capitol in south carolina. behind them, mark sanford, now a congressman from the state. next to him, mayor of charleston, joseph riley. ink a priebus was there. two rows behind the governor. on the left side of your screen you see congressman jim clyburn.
and next to him is the top democrat in the south carolina state legislature representative todd rutherford who joins us now. thank you for your time tonight. >> thanks for having me. >> let me ask you about your feelings about what happened in your state. did you ever think this would happen and how do you feel about having been part of this today? >> you know, i don't think anybody ever saw this coming, at least not now, at least not this soon. but i hate that it happened on the eve of this tragedy and i hate the tragedy is what made this happen. you know, the governor, we applaud her efforts. we know it didn't happen without her. we applaud all the conservatives and their c change in deciding something that has been hateful for years now all of a sudden they see it as hateful and want to take it down. >> i wondered today if there have been conservatives, if there have been republicans sort of operating behind the scenes who have been maybe pushing for this to happen in a long way and
if this is an opportunity or if you feel like this was spontaneous, something that was going to be inevitable simply because of the shock to the tate because of last week. >> we will take it however we can get it. when you see priebus there it certainly gives you the indication that maybe they were tired of the republican presidential candidates dancing around nine people getting killed over this hateful symbol and whether it ought to come down. every single time they had to answer a question, every single candidate that answered it stumbled over it and simply looked silly on a national stage rather than saying the flag is a hateful symbol and should have come down a long time ago. >> in the past in south carolina there have been obviously big fights about this issue. there have previously been very high level efforts to get the flag down at the state capitol. is it clear to you that it will work this time? what actually has to happen in order for this to really come down? >> you know, it is clear to me that this time it is going to work. i met with house leaders over the past several days and it's clear that within the house at least we're going to have the
votes to sign the agreement, the agreement that we're operating under right now, and bring a bill to the forefront that will take the flag down. once that bill gets to the senate there are one or two people that could hold i it but i don't know that they will have enough votes to stop it all together. for the first time literally in my 44 years it's clear that this flag is going to come down. >> do you think that there will be not so much a backlash but do you think there will be a dug-in effort to defend it? obviously this seems like more of a consensus issue that's it ever been but presumably there will be forces in south carolina that fight to keep it up there. >> there absolutely will be posts that fight to keep it up there. that has been used as a symbol to divide south carolina since 1962. in 2007 i put in a bill to take the flag down. it didn't even get a hearing. i think right now a lot of those power brokers, a lot of people in that state houses behind me have decided that senator pinckney who is our colleague, has been our colleague for over 20 years and most peaceful man in that whole body, he was killed for simply being black
and that enough is enough. and that flag needs to go. >> south carolina state representative todd rutherford, top democrat in the south carolina legislature. thank you for your time tonight. i know this has been a heck of a day. we do actually still have some new news tonight on the sat us the of the confederate flag in another southern state. we have that along with a lot of other news. heroes charge! ♪ ♪ (explosion) ♪
so this is what the great state as mississippi has flown as its state flag since 1894, more than a century. mississippi doesn't have a separate stand-alone confederate flag flying at its state capitol. mississippi just put the confederate flag inside the other one. it's part of their official state flag. in 2001 mississippi voters were asked if they wanted to replace that confederate symbol with something less controversial. mississippi voters decided overwhelmingly, no, they would rather keep their flag as is. look at that margin. tonight however it seems that the tide might be changing in mississippi because tonight mississippi's house speaker who is a republican says this, quote, as a christian, as a
christian i believe our state's flag has become a point of offense that needs to be removed. we need to begin having conversations about changing mississippi's flag. the "jackson clarion ledger" says this is the first time in mississippi republican has called for getting the rebel flag out of the state flag. also tonight walmart has announced that it stores will no longer carry merchandise that includes the confederate symbol. quote, we never want to offend anyone with the products that we offer. we've taken steps to remove all items promoting the confederate flag from our assortment, whether in our stores or on our website. we have a process in place to lead us to the right decisions. still at times items make their way into our assortment improperly. this is one of those instances. so ground breaking news tonight from mississippi and from walmart of all places. more to come for sure. stay with us.
our long national nightmare of raising tyranny is over. it's true. this morning the supreme court struck down federal raisin regulations that had been in place since the new deal. also there was a patent case involving this spider-man web blaster toy where you shoot webs out of your wrists like spidy does. the patent holder lost in this case but supreme court justice elena kagan, a comics fan, made not one, not two, not three, but i think four different spider-man jokes in her ruling today. she's previously referenced dr. seuss and the tommy tutone song "867-5309" so the spider-man thing should not have been a surprise but still awesome to see things like this, patents endow their holders with certain super powers but only for a limited time. yay for spider-man. yay for having an awesome comics nerd supreme court justice. here's the thing i want to know though. the court usually issues its rulings in june. this is june. usually they issue their rulings on mondays.
okay. it's monday today. it's already june 20 something, 22nd, right? they've got seven more rulings to hand down nape already expanded their ruling days to not just mondays but also thursdays. and then today they said they're also going to issue rulings this week on friday. why are they doing that? does that mean anything? what does it mean, if anything, particularly about the giant cases their about to rule on on the obamacare and same-sex marriage. the other thing i want to know about is this. is it not spooky that so much of the country is basically already assuming how the same-sex marriage case in particular is going to go? "the new york times" just ran this glowing profile, justice anthony kennedy today, his gay rights to previous times in his life. nice piece. this is the kind of thing you might expect to run though after justice kennedy had cast the deciding swing vote to legalize same-sex marriage. i mean, this is from the piece today. if as many analysts expect, the court does extend same-sex marriage rights nationwide, justice kennedy will get much of
the credit. it's like the "times" thought, we know they're going to legalize it. let's just run this piece about how it happened now before it actually happens. you know, they might not rule that way. and a sense of inevitability can be a powerful thing and can also be a dangerous thing. the reason this case is being decided by the supreme court in the first place is that the seemingly inevitable unstoppable march toward nationwide legal gay marriage was, in fact, stopped when an appeals court ruled last fall that some state marriage bans were legal. it was all inevitable until one day it was not. the justices could split the difference somehow. we should know thursday or friday or maybe monday? but we really do not know right now. are the expectations here getting way out ahead of the actual case? and how are they going to get all of these rulings out before the end of the month? let's ask someone.
>> i don't know these things. >> no, come on, at least you know what we don't know. is it weird that they've got this many left with this sort of time that they're doing rulings mondays, thursdays, fridays. >> it's always, this is what's done. we're thinking they're going to be done by tuesday, a week from tomorrow, but they've gone into july before. >> there's no hard and fast rule about what they do, and it doesn't say anything about what's happening now in terms of the judges finishing up their rulings, in terming of how they're negotiating and how they're going to go. no inclination? >> i think the inclination is that they're writing a lot of opinions and dissents and there's a lot of writing and drafting going on. it's because there's just an enormous amount of writing going on. >> the reason i use that word dangerous, i feel like there's
an expectation among people an expectation among people particularly who passionately support gay rights, there is a de facto expectation that the ruling is going to be a great day. and i feel that's dangerous because i feel like people are in for a real fall if that turns out to be a mixed decision or negative decision. >> it's really hard to get past the fact that anthony kennedy who you just observed is the guy. he's written the three landmark gay rights decisions. these are the cornerstones of our current legal regime when we look at gay righting. it's hard to imagine that a guy who writes so poignantly about dignity and families' expectations of dignity who asked about dignity a lot, that
he's going to turn his back on this. it's just hard to see it. so i think there is some basis for thinking that this is going to go the way people want it to go on the left side of the aisle. people are lobbying the court. there's a little bit of well-placed op eds that are an attempt to say history, history, history. this really matters. >> it's a last-minute opportunity to explain it to you. will you come back and explain what it means? >> yes. >> much more ahead, please do stay with us. when you bundle your home and auto insurance through progressive, you'll save a bundle! [ laughs ] jamie. right. make a bad bundle joke a buck goes in the jar. i guess that's just how the cookie bundles. now, you're gonna have two bundles of joy! i'm not pregnant. i'm gonna go. [ tapping, cash register dings ] there you go. [ buzzing ] bundle bee coming!
so there is some more news to report out of south carolina. it involves the funeral for the pastor of the church and frankly, the unbelievable circumstances that will lead up to that funeral. it's hard to believe after what we've discussed in this hour and what has happened in today's news, but we've got that update on the funeral in just a moment. stay with us. you wouldn't do half of your daily routine. so why treat your mouth any differently. brushing alone does less than half the job leaving behind millions of germs. complete the job with listerine®.
emanuel church. you know that in addition to being a pastor, clementa pinckney was also a well-respected south carolina state senator. he was first elected to the state house when he was only 23 years old, making him the youngest person ever elected to the state legislature in south carolina. he was then elected to the state senate four years later, and he has served there in the state senate for the past 15 years. last week when he was killed, his fellow state senators draped his desk in black and wept over him. there will be public viewings of his body before he is buried on friday. there will be a viewing at his own church and a second church as well, and there will be a viewing at the state house. and that is an honor and a beautiful thing for a long-time and beloved state legislator.
but in south carolina that means people coming to see his body and mourn him and pay their respects will have to walk past the confederate flag on the state capital grounds in order to do so. and that is amazing in any circumstance. but given the circumstance of his murder and murder of his fellow parishioners, that is something, him lying in state in the rotunda and the freaking confederate flag flying. but that's what made it all the more stunning, the governor now moving to move to take that flag down at state capital grounds. now there is this suddenly important logistical question about when they will do did and -- whether it will be done by the time he lies in state. president obama and first lady obama will all be there at the funeral in person.
and now we know that the eulogy will be given by president obama himself. that does it for us tonight. the eulogy will be given by president obama himself. first look" is up next. its is tuesday, june 23rd. right now on "first look" 12 tornados reported overnight. 47 million americans in high population areas are in the path today. two escaped killers left dna in a hideout. the hubt enters the 18th day. the ground of support swinging in favor of moving the confederate confederate flag. a possible assault with a kettle bell puts