politics which of course has a republican governor. massachusetts is a blue state with a very popular republican governor, charlie baker. you say this is a sure thing. does this reflect any other trends in terms of massachusetts democrats and endorse sxmts who she's associated with? >> it's interesting because most of sort of the establishment in massachusetts, the democrats, they did rally around capuano in this race. mora healey the a.g. in going with pressley she was more going on her own with that. other incumbents were challenged in massachusetts. looks like they survived. richard neil. steve lynch a more moderate even conservative democrat from south boston, that looks like they've survived. but this one, wow. mike capuano. 20 years in congress. never a serious challenge. all of a sudden loses by double digits at this point. >> steve kornacki, thank you very much, my friend. much appreciated. that does it for us tonight. we'll see you again tomorrow. now it's time for "the last word" with lawrence o'donnell. good evening, lawrence. >> good evening, rachel. and you steve talking about my old neighborhoods tonight in the congressional race.

fine with me. you can keep going. you know, i ran into ayanna pressley in massachusetts a few weeks ago and she told me unofficially off the record that they had polling inside their campaign that was more positive than the public polling which showed her significantly behind. and you know, candidates always tell you that. they always say our private polls look better. but she was very convincing about it. and that district in all the iterations that steve was describing from when it was jfk's district to tip o'neill's district to capuano's district, those borders have changed a lot in the district and the way it weaves its way now around boston, through boston. but this is the new face of boston. it is an amazing and kind of wonderful thing to see for someone like me who grew up in a strictly segregated city where this was impossible. >> to see michael capuano tonight give that concession when i think only about 11% or 12% of the vote was in. at the time he started conceding we didn't even have a call of

the election from the associated press or anybody else. but clearly when she told you that her polling was better than you might expect from the public information he must have been looking at some of that same stuff because they knew right out of the gate they were toast. and looks like she's going to written by a lot. >> looking at neighborhoods he was supposed to do much better in they saw him getting crushed. was a obvious way to read it at that point. but rachel, trying to squeeze this in in a newsday that includes everything that it has included, including your great interview with john kerry, this has been quite an hour you've just been through, and now i'm going to try to squeeze an awful lot of stuff into the next hour. >> thank you, lawrence. >> thank you, rachel. well, bob woodward has done it again. he has written another book that goes deep inside he another presidency. and as usual, portions of the book appeared in the "washington post" first. they appeared today, a week before the book will actually be published. bob woodward has spent his career at the "washington post" and has written books about the inside workings of every

presidency beginning with the nixon white house. bob woodward quotes white house chief of staff john kelly, calling the president an idiot. he quotes defense secretary james mattis comparing donald trump's comprehension level to "a fifth or sixth grader." he quotes james mattis telling the president he's trying to "prevent world war 3." he quotes donald trump calling his attorney general jeff sessions "mentally retarded." and he quotes the president's former criminal defense lawyer john dowd telling the president that if the president testifies under oath in the mueller investigation the president will end up in "an orangeup psuit." the lawyer told the president "you are not a good witness." and so tonight the trump white house has made the mistake of going to war with bob woodward, a war they cannot win, because they don't know how bob woodward does it. and that means they don't know what they're up against. the white house press secretary issued a written statement

saying, "this book is nothing more than fabricated stories." john kelly issued a written statement denying he called the president an idiot. defense secretary james mattis issued a written statement saying "the contemptuous words about the president attributed to me in woodward's book were never uttered by me or in my presence." that appears to be a reference to the description of trump as a fifth-grader. but james mattis does not seem to dispute any of the other many quotes attributed to him in the book including his statement to the president about he the defense secretary trying to prevent world war 3. the trump white house has no idea what they're dealing with when it comes to a bob woodward book, and they obviously had no idea what they were dealing with when bob woodward was pulling all of that information out of the trump white house for his book. bob woodward described some of his method directly to the president when donald trump called him to talk about the

book after the book was already being printed and it was too late for bob woodward to interview donald trump for a book. because bob woodward is the consummate professional, he immediately began recording the phone call with the president and he told the president he was recording the call. the president pretended he was disappointed he didn't get to do an interview with bob woodward for the book. bob woodward explained he asked more than half a dozen people in the white house for that interview. people who said they passed the request on to the president and people outside the white house, including senator lindsey graham. bob woodward released today a recording of that entire phone call with the president. here's some of it. >> senator graham said he had talked to you about talking to me. now, is that not true? >> senator graham actually mentioned it quickly on one meeting. that is true.

that is true. no, but that is true. mentioned it quickly. not like, you know -- and i would certainly have thought that maybe you would have called the office. but that's okay. i'll speak to kellyanne. i am a little surprised that she wouldn't have told me, that she just walked in -- i'm talking to bob woodward. he said he told you about speaking to me. but you never told me. why didn't you tell me? i would have been very happy to speak to him. all right. so what are you going to do? so i have another bad book coming out. >> it goes on. and you know, i -- what you can count on is that i've been very careful. evelyn, are you on? >> yes. >> evelyn ductee who's my assistant -- >> hello, evelyn. >> she transcribed all the tapes because with permission i taped people for hundreds of hours. >> good. >> and i think there's nothing in this book that doesn't come from a firsthand source. is that correct, evelyn? >> but are you naming names or

do you just say sources? >> the names we're -- >> do you name sources? i mean, are you naming the people or just say, you know, people have said? >> i say at 2:00 on this day the following happened and everyone who's there including yourself is quoted. and i'm sorry i didn't get to ask you about -- >> i mean, you do know i'm doing a great job for the country. >> oh, yeah. i'm sure he knows that. he's got tapes. that's what the trump white house really did not understand until today, if they understand it even now. and bob woodward played one of those tapes publicly today. that phone call with the president. to try to show the white house what he has. and then he told the president in that phone call, i taped people for hundreds of hours. and so now tonight donald trump knows that bob woodward taped

members of the trump team for hundreds of hours. no one works harder at trying to find out what has happened inside the room in washington than bob woodward. and no one has more sources than bob woodward. when bob woodward was working on a book about the clinton white house called "the agenda," he came to me because so much of the clinton white house agenda had to pass through the senate finance committee where i was the chief of staff. and i will never forget, bob woodwa woodward's first question to me, with no smalltalk, no beating around the bush, he wanted to know about what happened in a meeting with president clinton and congressional leaders in the cabinet room at the white house. and so his very first question to me was everyone in the cabinet room meeting says that you were taking notes, can i have your notes? if those days there were plenty of reporters who were trying to get me to tell them what happened in the meetings in the white house, in the senate

majority leader's office, in the speaker's office. but no one ever asked if he or she could have my notes. bob woodward always goes for the best possible sources and notes are always better than human memory. many years later, when i was no longer working in government, i visited bob woodward's home a few times, where much of the space is devoted to his office, where his assistants are constantly transcribing audio recordings. he gave me a tour of the workshop, a place where you can see decades and decades of archived audio recordings, recordings that are the building blocks of the investigative journalism that has so often become the defining version of a presidency, the woodward version. what bob woodward calls the best obtainable version of the truth. and so tonight bob woodward has tapes and the white house has press releases. the most damning quotes in the excerpts of bob woodward's book

that were already released today from the president's former criminal defense lawyer john dowd. bob woodward describes a rehearsal session with the president where john dowd pretended to be robert mueller asking the president questions. the "washington post" reports that in that rehearsal session donald trump's answers were "stumbles, contradictions, and lies until the prevent eventually lost his cool. this thing's a god damn hoax trump erupted at the start of a 30-minute rant that finished with him saying i don't really want to testify." the book then describes a meeting john dowd with had robert mueller and mueller's deputy james quarles in which dowd explained why he didn't want the president to testify. "i'm not going o'sit there and let him look like an idiot and you public that transcript because everything leaks in washington and the guys overseas are going to say, i told you he was an idiot, i told you he was a goddamn dumbbell. what are we dealing with this idiot for?" after that meeting with robert mueller john dowd gave the president the following advice.

"don't testify. it's either that or an orange jumpsuit." the president then said, "i'll be a real good witness. you are not a good witness, dowd replied. mr. president, i'm afraid i just can't help you." and the next morning john dowd quit and he left an opening on trump's defense team that has since been filled by rudy giuliani. leading off our discussion now, john heilemann, national affairs analyst for nbc news and msnbc. he's also co-host and executive producer of showtime's "the circus." tim o'brien's with us, executive editor of bloomberg opinion. he's the author of "trump nation," a book about donald trump. and msnbc contributor. and david frum, a senior editor for "the atlantic" is the author of "trumpocracy." john heilemann, you've done this kind of work that bob woodward has done, you've done it on the campaign trail, most famously and most widely read, "game change" and other books.

your assessment of how this battle is going so far as we come to the end of day one of the trump white house versus bob woodward. >> well, about how you would have expected it to go, which is to say very well for bob woodward and very poorly for the white house. the white house has had -- has been lucky in some sense in its enemies, although everything that we've read so far from the woodward book, at least the excerpts and the reporting on it is very consistent with what we saw in michael wolff's book. it is the reality that whatever you think of "fire and fury" michael wolff is a more easily attacked messenger than bob woodward. again, without even being mean to michael wolff although there are issues with michael wolff. bob woodward is the gold standard. right? and i think there is -- >> and bob woodward has been in this crossfire before. >> many times before. and look, he's got -- again, you said i'm familiar with it. i am. there's a really very high premium. a if you're going to do a book on deep background where you're going to say i'm going to quote verbatim from meetings, from notes, from people's

recollections, the pressure it puts on the reporter is that you are never going to be able to do what donald trump is trying to play the game with bob woodward about. who told you that? woodaward has said with these people he will never say i got this directly from jim mattis, from john kelly. the likelihood is he spoke to all of them. but he will never come out -- the reality is in many of these situations he's going to have that same quote knowing how bob works, he's going to have it from the speaker, from the person who heard, it from the people that -- other people in the room, other people they told about it. and memorialized perhaps in e-mails and notes of the conversation. he's never going to say who the source is. but because of the fact that woodward's been doing this for so long and because so many of his books have withstood the kind of criticism that come in all administrations of deep background books, because his books have held up so well to scrutiny for so long he's in a position of extraordinary power

and although there are white house officials coming out saying i didn't use this word, i didn't use that word, what they're not doing is quibbling with the gist of the reporting and in many cases some of the people who are quibbling with the specific words are proven liars in the past. again, bob woodward not a proven liar. quite the opposite. >> here's the president's latest lob in the battle tonight. he's tweeted, "the woodward book has already been refuted and discredited by general secretary of defense james mattis and general chief of staff john kelly. their quotes were made up frauds, a con on the public. likewise other stories and quotes. woodward is a dem operative? notice timing?" tim o'brien, various white houses have accused at different times bob woodward of being of the opposite party whenever these books come out. >> it's interesting that trump even now cannot help himself but give free publicity that's going to boost sales to this very critical book just like he did to omarosa and just like he did to michael wolff because he

personalizes all of these and in the midst of it he can't think strategically. and anybody who's covered trump knows that the full picture of what woodward is present sng only consistent with all the reporting that's been out there for the last 2 1/2 years since trump began running, it's consistent with who donald trump has been since he was about 7 years old. he ran the trump organization this way. it was a bunch of people biting each other in the back, not loyal to him ultimately, and he ran roughshod over all of them. he ran his political campaign when he ran for the presidency exactly the same way. you were in the midst of that, john. you know what that was about. and the picture that's created here is amply solidified and backed up by lots of other reporting. with the additional factor that now you have bob woodward and the woodward method, which is he triangulates with sources, he backs things up with documents. he has tapes. it's a different order of

magnitude from any kind of reporter that trump has ever dealt with before. in the same way that the mueller investigation is of a different order of magnitude on the legal side. >> but let me just say on this for a second as you you were a different kind of reporter than trump had ever dealt with before when he dealt with you, and he ended up in court with you because he was stunned that you were the one who he could not con on the question of how rich he was. so and you won the lawsuit against him -- >> and i had tapes. >> and you had tapes. of the depositions and so forth. but talk about trump, when he's up against something he doesn't understand because you experienced that with your own book about trump and his business. >> well, the tricky thing here is he is constantly up against things he doesn't understand because he's impatient, he's ignorant, and he has no real sense that he's vulnerable to anything. he's been protected his whole life, first by wealth, then by celebrity, and now by the presidency. and he's never really suffered the consequences of his phenomenally bad

decision-making. until he actually stares it in the face. it clicked with him a couple months ago that don jr. might suddenly be vulnerable in the mueller investigation. in our case i don't think he ever thought "the new york times" or my publisher would retain attorneys to back me up. he then never thought they would get him for two days, for two eight-hour depositions in which we put his own tax returns, his own bank records and business records in front of him. and he was found on dozens of occasions to have lied. and that went into the record. and he essentially created a rosetta stone for understanding the kind of pathology and the world that trump exists in. so one of the reasons he gets into these situations is because of who he is. one of the reasons he survives them is because of who he is. and in that tape, that conversation with him and woodward, he's very blase about the fact that he's trying to lie his way out of never knowing that bob woodward tried to interview him. there's no real fear in it. he's playing ping-pong. >> yeah. and david frum, that's one of the great things about the tape that bob woodward released

today-s there's a tape of donald trump and everything about it is false. i mean, it's just quite obvious. and people should go online and listen to the whole thing. where he's telling a recurring lie throughout the whole thing, which is that no one told him about this interview request and then bob woodward presses him just on one, on lindsey graham. he goes oh, well, okay, lindsey graham told -- and it's kind of a look into the way trump operates with every lie he can get away with he will try. >> it is a really important tape to listen to because what you also hear is as he is nailed on the lie by woodward, very elegantly and politely, the president becomes -- at the beginning he's relatively suave by his standards. he becomes angrier and then ultimately incredibly self-pitying. meanwhile, he summons in kellyanne conway, who's caught in a lie too. and again nailed elegantly and politely. and she has a very different method. first she tries to brazen it out, then she throws other people under the bus. then she finally desperately changes the subject. the thing i find myself thinking about a lot as i review these

first stories from the book, and of course we'll all want to read the finished product, i understand as i think about it the james mattises and the general kellys. they're staying to serve the country. and i understand why they have to -- they feel they need to protect their position. to me donald trump is what he is and bob woodward is of course the elegant and eminent figure that he is. i'm puzzled by the gary cohns, the h.r. mcmasters, the rex tillersons, the people who obviously talked to woodward, who obviously have unburdened themselves of their sense of the extreme not only unfitness but danger to the country by this president. are you going to do anything more than talk to a reporter months after the fact? why didn't you resign together? why didn't you on the day you left -- gary cohn, you are telling me that the president cannot remember that if you take a piece of paper off his desk that it was there, two hours later he then forgets the paper was ever there and he intended a

xafrktly bad policy but it was his policy and he can't remember it? why didn't you share that with a committee of congress at a time when it was relevant? why now and why anonymously? i understand it's hazardous. but you know, a lot of americans have had over the centuries take a lot of risks to defend the country. it's not so much to risk getting an angry negative tweet from this president compared to what other people have done in order to defend your country. >> and david, one other phenomenon we're seeing just in these excerpts, and you're right, we're going to have to see the whole book to analyze this. but it does seem like that the people who are swimming away from this titanic that is the trump white house or rowing away in their lifeboats, however you want to put it, are very eager to tell bob woodward extremely negative stuff about the president, which means it seems like they're very eager to try to claim a space in the sane world as fast as they can. reince priebus and as you say gary cohn and others who appear to be sources for this book. >> yeah.

well, and i think many of them are obviously capable people and some of them probably morally fine people. i have a lot of respect for people like gary cohn and rex tillerson too. but own it. stand up. don't be anonymous. and don't wait. don't give it to bob woodward. we're glad to have it in any way it comes. but why not at the time? one of the questions presented by this book is should you serve this president? for people who are doing it for the right reasons and are in national security roles, i commend them and thank them for serving the president. but if you are going to leave or if you're forced out, make your resignation count. do it in a group. do it on the same day. and then immediately spell out in detail why you're doing it. >> david frum, tim o'brien, john heilemann, thank you for starting us off tonight. when we come back, the most revealing moment in the kavanaugh confirmation hearing today came when brett kavanaugh refused to shake the hand of a man whose daughter was killed in the mass murder at her high school in parkland, florida.

that man, fred guttenberg, will join us and tell us what he wanted to say to the nominee. also tonight, we have more revelations from bob woodward's book and the "new york times" is reporting that special prosecutor robert mueller has made the president a new offer. but it's an offer that the president's lawyers might want him to refuse. the fact is, there are over ninety-six

hundred roads named "park" in the u.s. it's america's most popular street name. but allstate agents know that's where the similarity stops. if you're on park street in reno, nevada, the high winds of the washoe zephyr could damage your siding. and that's very different than living on park ave in sheboygan, wisconsin, where ice dams could cause water damage. but no matter what park you live on, one of 10,000 local allstate agents knows yours. now that you know the truth, are you in good hands?

tonight t"the new york time"

is reporting that special prosecutor robert mueller will accept written answers from the president on questions related to whether his campaign colluded with russia to intd feerfere wi the 2016 election but not about obstruction of justice. it's still unclear whether mueller will continue to try to interview the president about obstruction of justice or subpoena the president to answer questions about that. according to bob woodward's new book "fear" the biggest problem for donald trump and his lawyers has always been donald trump. donald trump gets the last line of the book, and it is in the description by the president's former defense lawyer, john dowd. trump had one overriding problem that dowd knew but couldn't bring himself to say to the president. you're a f-ing liar. joining our discussion now, harry littman, former u.s. attorney and deputy attorney general under president clinton and maya wiley who served as

counsel to new york city mayor bill de blasio. she's an msnbc legal analyst. and maya, in the woodward book we're seeing that john dowd is calling the president a liar and the "new york times" reporting that robert mueller has partially given up on the idea of ever getting an interview with donald trump and is interested in possibly getting written answers at least on the collusion questions. >> yeah, i think it's pretty clear that donald trump can't tell the truth on a regular basis. we know that. that's clearly something he has demonstrated in public. so it's not so surprising that someone like a john dowd, who i think has denied, it may have said something like that. i think at the end of the day the issue here is donald trump can be forced to testify. i think the supreme court would uphold that unless brett kavanaugh is a supreme court justice potentially sitting on that bench. but the question for mueller is

how to wrap this up. he probably wants to do that because of the election, and this is an opportunity to do that. >> harry littman, the written questions is a very unusual step in a criminal investigation. i'm not familiar with a case where that's happened before. but it is exactly what happens in civil litigation. i think a lot of people out there are thinking, well, it will be a lot easier for the president to answer written questions under oath. not necessarily, as people discover in civil lawsuits, when they're given written questions called interrogatories and they have to answer those under oath. it can be as difficult and challenging even trying to do the written version. >> it can be difficult and challenging. for a guy like trump it's not as difficult and challenging. it can be sculpted by the lawyers and carefully put together. but you know, the number one rule with mueller is he knows 50 times what we know and we're not

aware of. so i think if he's saying this and making this kind of concession it's not because as the "times" sort of quotes or suggests that team trump feels that he's been worn down but rather that he feels, as maya says, he may not need the evidence. i think he's playing with a strong hand, not a weak hand. >> and maya, the idea of separating out the russia collusion investigation from the obstruction of justice investigation, you can see how that can make a certain sense for the prosecutor. they are two different things. there can be intersections with them. but the president's behavior, when he's firing james comey and when he's explaining that to lester holt, that all kind of stands alone within the walls of the white house. >> i think that's right. you have a clear public record when it comes to trump on obstruction of justice. it makes a lot of sense that mueller would say that's not the one i have to ask you a lot about. what he really wants to know is not what donald trump knows but what donald trump is going to

say in response to specific documents and questions. that's really the primary -- any prosecutor wants to be prepared. right? they want to know everything that they -- he knows. he knows what he needs to know. what he doesn't know is what's donald trump going to say if i ask him this? >> harry, what do you think the trump lawyers' advice will be? do you think they'll advise the president not to even answer the written questions? >> look, i think this is one more sort of -- we only have their characterization of the letter. we don't really know the full flavor of it. it would be to his advantage to answer written questions. not on obstruction, of course, where mueller's going to want o'know what was his state of mind. if that's really the offer, i think they take it. my sense is we're going to learn a little more about this in the next 24, 48 hours. >> maya wily and harry litman, thank you for joining us tonight. and coming up, a big upset win in massachusetts. tonight a come-from-behind

victory by ayanna pressley. massachusetts will now have its first african-american member of the house of representatives. and we have more from bob woodward's book. some of the extraordinary material about how the president's staff and cabinet are working around the president, hiding information from him, and how the defense secretary says he is trying to prevent world war 3. even though i live with a higher risk of stroke due to afib not caused by a heart valve problem. so if there's a better treatment than warfarin, i'm up for that. eliquis. eliquis is proven to reduce stroke risk better than warfarin. plus has significantly less major bleeding than warfarin. eliquis is fda-approved and has both. so what's next? seeing these guys. don't stop taking eliquis unless your doctor tells you to, as stopping increases your risk of having a stroke. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding.

while taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily and it may take longer than usual for any bleeding to stop. seek immediate medical care for sudden signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising. eliquis may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures. eliquis, the number one cardiologist-prescribed blood thinner. ask your doctor if eliquis is what's next for you. cardiologist-prescribed blood thinner. after bill's back needed a vacation from his vacation. so he stepped on the dr. scholl's kiosk. it recommends our best custom fit orthotic to relieve foot, knee, or lower back pain so you can move more. dr. scholl's. born to move.

there's nothing small about your business. with dell small business technology advisors, you get the one-on-one partnership to grow your business. the dell vostro 14 laptop. get up to 40% off on select pcs. call 877-buy-dell today. ( ♪ ) today, life-changing technology from abbott is helping hunt them down at their source. because the faster we can identify new viruses, the faster we can get to stopping them. the most personal technology, is technology with the power to change your life. life. to the fullest.

we have a big upset tonight in the state of massachusetts where ayanna pressley, the first african-american woman elected to the boston city council, has

unseated incumbent democratic representative michael capuano in the primary for massachusetts's 7th congressional district. that means it's time for steve kornacki. steve, you know, i mentioned this to rachel. i ran into ayanna pressley of massachusetts a couple weeks ago on a weekend and she told me that they had inside polling inside their campaign that looked a lot better than the public polling. the public polling showed her behind by a significant margin. and you know, campaigns generally tell you that they have better information inside. and i wasn't sure what to believe about it. but she was pretty persuasive. she described everything that was happening in the district very persuasively. so i am not terribly surprised tonight. >> yeah. i think mike capuano certainly surprised. and the reason, a lot of this has to do -- it's the state of the democratic party right now. what democrats are looking for in this district and nationally. but it's also this. this district, it's a big portion of the city of boston. the other big piece of this is the city of summerville, massachusetts. michael capuano was the mayor of

summerville before he went to congress. he got elected to congress 20 years ago. the reason he won that democratic primary in 1998, he won the city of summerville that year by 45 points over his nearest competitor. how much has summerville right outside boston, used to be half young professionals, half working class, that was always sort of the mix, it's been changing through the years. tonight summerville is 50-50, between ayanna pressley and mike capuano. why did he concede so early? he saw those numbers out of summerville and said it's not going to get any better for me in boston, another parts of this district. you see pressley running away with it. just in terms of the history, whatwhat this means, we talked about this last hour, but the lineage of this seat, kennedy, tip o'neill, another kennedy, capuano, and now the first african-american female who will ever represent massachusetts in congress. >> and steve, even on her -- the night she won here in new york, alexandria ocasio-cortez actually mentioned ayanna

pressley as one of the other candidates around the country who she was rooting for, she was supporting. they are very much very similar kinds of candidates taking over similar kinds of districts that had changed demographically while a long-time serving member of the house enjoyed a rather easy incumbency. >> yeah. two women of color who had defeated long-serving white males in districts that have become majority non-white. but i also have to say quickly when you look at this, when you look at how pressley's doing there in summerville i've got to say this is a lot of -- this is not just people of color voting for ayanna pressley. i think there are a lot of white voters in this district too who looked at her and said you know, what maybe it's time, let's go with her. >> absolutely. and i know a lot of those white voters. she's a very popular politician in boston. steve kornacki, thank you very much for joining us. really appreciate it. coming up next, what could have been i think the most important moment today in brett kavanau kavanaugh's confirmation hearing. it was the moment he refused to shake the hand of a man whose daughter was killed in the mass

murder at her high school in parkland, florida. that man, fred guttenberg, will join us. ♪ hungry eyes ♪ one look at you and i can't disguise ♪ ♪ i've got hungry eyes ♪ i feel the magic between you and i ♪ ♪ i've got hungry eyes ♪ now i've got you in my sights ♪ applebee's new 3-course meal

starting at $11.99. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood. yes. it's a targeted medicine proven to help prevent severe asthma attacks, and lower oral steroid use. about 50% of people with severe asthma have too many cells called eosinophils in their lungs. fasenra™ is designed to work with the body to target and remove eosinophils. fasenra™ is an add-on injection for people 12 and up with severe eosinophilic asthma. don't use fasenra™ for sudden breathing problems or other problems caused by eosinophils. fasenra™ may cause headache, sore throat, and allergic reactions. get help right away if you have swelling of your face, mouth, and tongue, or trouble breathing. don't stop your asthma treatments unless your doctor tells you to. tell your doctor if your asthma worsens or if you have a parasitic infection. fasenra™ is a targeted treatment for eosinophilic asthma. that's important.

ask an asthma specialist about fasenra™. but let's be honest, nobody likes dealing with insurance. which is why esurance hired me, dennis quaid, as their spokesperson because apparently, i'm highly likable. see, they know it's confusing. i literally have no idea what i'm getting, dennis quaid. that's why they're making it simple, man in cafe. and more affordable. thank you, dennis quaid. you're welcome. that's a prop apple. i'd tell you more, but i only have 30 seconds. so here's a dramatic shot of their tagline so you'll remember it. esurance. it's surprisingly painless. so you'll remember it. ♪ as moms, we send our kids out into the world, full of hope. and we don't want something like meningitis b getting in their way. meningococcal group b disease, or meningitis b, is real. bexsero is a vaccine to help prevent meningitis b in 10-25 year olds. even if meningitis b is uncommon, that's not a chance we're willing to take. meningitis b is different from the meningitis most teens were probably vaccinated against when younger.

we're getting the word out against meningitis b. our teens are getting bexsero. bexsero should not be given if you had a severe allergic reaction after a previous dose. most common side effects are pain, redness or hardness at the injection site; muscle pain; fatigue; headache; nausea; and joint pain. bexsero may not protect all individuals. tell your healthcare professional if you're pregnant or if you have received any other meningitis b vaccines. ask your healthcare professional about the risks and benefits of bexsero and if vaccination with bexsero is right for your teen. moms, we can't wait. ♪ we're doing this in order to prevent world war 3. that's what defense secretary james mattis said to president trump according to bob woodward's new book "fear." secretary mattis reportedly said that to the president when the president showed no understanding at all about why the united states has a military presence in south korea.

mattis and others explained to the president that the u.s. military equipment in south korea could alert us to a missile launched by north korea within seven seconds of the launch rather than the 15 minutes it would take for the military's other tracking systems to pick up a north korean missile launch. bob woodward quotes the president as wanting to assassinate syrian dictator bashar al assad in a phone call to secretary mattis. "let's f-ing kill him. let's go in. let's kill the f-ing lot of them, trump said, according to woodward. mattis told the president that he would get right on it. but after hanging up the phone he told a senior aide, we're not going to do any of that. we're going to be much more measured." back with us, tim o'brien and john heilemann. and john, that picture of the secretary of defense getting basically a assassinate, kill

any way you want to assad and maybe that means go to war, kill all of them, what does that mean? does that mean an invasion? who knows what it means because the secretary basically ignored it according to woodward. >> i think there are two separate questions there. one question is what did trump mean by it? and the answer is i'm sure trump had no idea what he meant by it and it was the typical trump gibberish coming out of his mouth. sought defense secretary did what we have all been hoping and praying people in these positions have been doing. woodward apparently describes it in someplace here in the book because it's been quoted in "washington post" and other places as an administrative coup d'etat. that puts a negative spin on it. others would say guardrails for humanity. guardrails of the safety of the planet. is that some of these people like jim mattis are in this job precisely to do this very thing, which is to stop the president from doing things that are rash, ill-considered, obviously dangerous, right? you see it throughout in this reporting, that that seems to be the case. they all -- the stuff that's most unnerving in this book

beyond the thing we were discussing earlier in the show, the complicity and cowardice of the people around trump, the enabling behavior, beyond that the most disturbing stuff in the book is on foreign policy because all of these people look at him and say you're a dim witt, you're a child and you're dangerous and we have to save you from yourself. >> and then there are the personal grudges, tim, that the president doesn't want facts to get in the way of his personal grudges. bob woodward's book reports the scene where the president is describing john mccain's experience as a p.o.w. in vietnam and says the opposite, the exact opposite of what everybody knows. he says that john mccain was released early by the north vietnamese because mccain's father was such a high-ranking u.s. navy admiral. and then the book quotes james mattis as immediately correcting trump and saying, "no, mr. president, i think you've got it reversed." and the defense secretary then explained that mccain, who died on august 25th, had in fact turned down early release and was brutally tortured during his

fine years at the hanoi hilton. to which trump says, "oh, okay." so tim, it seems that trump had been getting away with that lie around any other circle in the white house until jim mattis is sitting there and has to correct him because truly that isn't the first time trump tried that. >> and remember, this is the donald trump who successfully got five draft deferments sew didn't have to serve in the vietnam war. donald trump, who refused to fly the flag at half mast over the white house after mccain passed away. he's the guy who holds on to these grudges for a very long time. you know, david frum touched on this earlier and john touched on it, is why does anyone serve in this white house? and i think the short answer for the most part is because they're craven. people are either getting their resumes stamped or they're trying to get ahead in the world. mattis is the one person you can point to i think, though, very clearly as seeing himself as a buffer between trump and the abyss. and you see it in this north korea anecdote because the most

dangerous thing about donald trump is as he's learning on the job and he's learning how to be president on the job what he's going to naturally gravitate towards are the areas in which he can act unilaterally. everything that requires him to reach out to capitol hill or rely on a team, things like overturning obamacare or passing any kind of sophisticateroad legislation, he's going to fumble. the things where he can just write an order or issue a command is inevitably going to attract him. and that's where it gets very scary on issues like assassinating assad or bombing north korea. and why having people of conscience and courage and a spine like mattis in that white house does really matter. but he's an exception to the rule in that white house. >> just go back, quickly go back to the mccain thing. because it's not just that he holds on to grudges. it's that he holds on to crazy conspiracy theories. and you know that where he got this was on twitter or from the "weekly world news" or wherever else he gets his information. he's been believing for a long time precisely the opposite of the truth. and i'm sure after mattis

corrected him in that meeting trump went on to repeat that story -- that "oh, okay" was not oh, oh, my god, i've been wrong this whole time? oh, god. how do i fix this misapprehensi misapprehension? what it was was oh, whatever. and then he went back to believing what i'm sure he still to this day believes which is that mccain was a traitor, that he got out early -- >> that he's not a war hero. >> that he was a manchurian candidate. all the crazy stuff that lives in the right-wing fever swamps of social media where trump gets most of his information about things are still i'm sure firmly implanted in that frontal lobe of his, whatever that -- >> and tim, nowhere does donald trump have stronger support than in alabama, but alabamans don't seem to realize what donald trump thinks of them. the woodward back has donald trump referring to jeff sessions this way. "this guy is mentally retarded. he's this dumb southerner. he couldn't even be a one-person country lawyer down in alabama."

and so clearly -- and we had the report last week of donald trump making fun of jeff sessions and his accent, and his southern accent. and so clearly if trump supporters in alabama understood donald trump's real attitude toward them, there might abe different support level down there. >> i think that's the wild card about the wood ward baward book real world impact is it going to have. you saw in the kavanaugh hearings that the gop is not going to let go of donald trump until they have some goods in the bag. >> tim o'brieen and john heilemann, thank you for joining us tonight. when we come back, what i thought was the most stunning and revealing moment in today's confirmation hearing. it was something brett kavanaugh refused to do. ♪

heartburn and gas? ♪ now fight both fast new tums chewy bites with gas relief all in one relief of heartburn and gas ♪ ♪ tum tum tum tums new tums chewy bites with gas relief booking a flight doesn't have to be expensive. just go to priceline. it's the best place to book a flight a few days before my trip and still save up to 40%. just tap and go... for the best savings on flights, go to priceline.

on the new sleep number 360 smart bed. it senses your movement and automatically adjusts to keep you both comfortable. it's the final days where all beds are on sale. the queen sleep number 360 c2 smart bed is now only $899. ends sunday. since joining ninehahi, ubmonths ago,o. my priority has been to listen to you... to cities and communities, and to my own employees. i've seen a lot of good. we've changed the way people get around. we've provided new opportunities. but moving forward, it's time to move in a new direction. and i want you to know just how excited i am, to write uber's next chapter, with you. one of our core values as a company, is to always do the right thing. and if there are times when we fall short, we commit to being open, taking responsibility for the problem, and fixing it. this begins with new leadership, and a new culture. and you're going to see improvements to our service. like enhanced background checks, 24/7 customer support,

better pickups, and ride quality, for both riders, and drivers. you've got my word, that we're charting an even better road for uber, and for those that rely on us every day. ♪

there will always be an asterisk after your name. appointed by a president named as an unindicted coconspirator after the vast majority of documents relating to the most instructive period of his life were concealed. >> is so a supreme court confirmation hearing unlike any other began today in the senate judiciary committee. federal appeals court judge brett kavanaugh is the first person to be nominated for the united states supreme court by an unindicted coconspirator in a current federal criminal case. if you've been following the

kavanaugh confirmation process closely, you probably learned nothing that you didn't already know about brett kavanaugh in today's hearing except this. the two men facing each other there are both proud and loving fathers. one of them has two children. the other used to have two children. now he has one. his 14-year-old daughter jamie was one of the 17 people killed in the mass murder at marjory stoneman douglas high school in parkland, florida. fred guttenberg explained what you're seeing in that photograph this way. just walked up to judge kavanaugh as morning session ended, put out my hand to introduce myself as jamie guttenberg's dad. he pulled his hand back, turned his back to me and walked away. i guess he did not want to deal with the reality of gun violence. here is the video of that moment, and you will see fred guttenberg is the first person to speak to brett kavanaugh when he gets out of the witness

chair. >> four . >> the photograph of brett kavanaugh turning his back on fred guttenberg went viral almost immediately and by the time brett kavanaugh made his opening remarks, the white house was already issuing statements defending brett kavanaugh turning his back on fred guttenberg. so i had high hopes for brett kavanaugh. high hopes that he would find fred guttenberg in the audience and just shake hands with him, say something sympathetic to a grieving father in his opening remarks, perhaps, but he didn't. he could easily have just added a sentence or two. that's the most it would take to his opening remarks. he didn't say a word about fred guttenberg or fred's daughter jamie, but he did talk about

some other girls, girls with very bright futures. >> for the past seven years, i've coached my daughters' basketball teams. i love coaching. all the girls i've coached are awesome. and special congratulations to the girls on this year's sixth grade cyo championship team, anna, quinn, kelsi, shawnee, chloe, alex, ava, sofia and margaret. i love helping the girls grow into confident players. i know that confidence on the basketball court translates into confidence in other aspects of life. >> i love everything about that. i love that he loves coaching his daughters' team and i love that he gave a shout out to them and the other sixth graders on the team. i love everything he said there and i believe he means every single word of that. i know that confidence on the

basketball court translates into confidence in other aspects of life. not if you don't get to have a life. not if a mass murderer walks into your school when you're 14 years old and takes your life away, and that's what happened to jamie guttenberg, and now her dad goes everywhere he can and reaches his hand out to everyone he can to try to bring sanity to america's gun laws. he did it to me at a big crowded event in washington. fred guttenberg approached me the same way he approached brett kavanaugh today with that outstretched hand and said, i am fred guttenberg, i'm the father of jamie guttenberg who was murdered at parkland, and those words, those words froze me in place, listening to every word that he had to say. marveling that he could compose

himself and smile through that unimaginable burden of grief. and today fred guttenberg tried that same approach with the nominee for the supreme court of the united states and the nominee turned his back on him and then when given a chance to apologize, to clarify, it didn't seem to even cross his mind. so even though brett kavanaugh took no questions today from the senators, we learned more about him in his response to fred guttenberg than we will probably learn about brett kavanaugh in the rest of the hearings. and joining us now, fred guttenberg. >> lawrence, you just gave me my first legitimate laugh of the day. i remember exactly what you're talking about at the march for our lives on march 24th. i remember walking up to you and those exact words that you described are exactly what i said today to judge kavanaugh.

when i got to the part about my daughter jamie was one of the kids murdered in parkland was when you see him turn around and move the other way. >> and, fred, just as a -- as a human experience, i just have to tell you that when -- when i heard those words from you, it was like -- it was just like a cementing in place. it was like the world -- i forgot the world around me. there was nothing else to do except take in what you had to say. i would assume that most of the time with most people in washington who you approach, who you try to talk to about this, when you identify yourself that way, that they -- they must respond to you, don't they, most of them? >> you know what, lawrence? they do. and i don't make an effort just to go up to people who i think believe in gun safety. as you said in your open, guy up to everyone. i want to talk to everyone about

this because if you agree with me then we work together. if you don't agree with me, i hope to change your mind or at least find a place where we can agree because it's in everyone's public safety if that happens. justice kavanaugh -- judge kavanaugh does not agree with my positions. as a dad i watched him introduce his kids. he has a beautiful family. he seems like an amazing dad, and i'm sure he's a wonderful man. i've never really met him other than the effort to shake his hand, but i know by his public statements, i know by his rulings that i have reason for concern. i'll give you an example. we passed gun safety in florida. it's passing in other states around the country. everywhere we pass safety, the nra files a lawsuit. the nra is right now spending a lot of money to get him selected and what will eventually happen is one of these lawsuits, maybe

it will be florida, will end up in front of him and he will have to judge it. i am concerned that something like raising the age to 21, which we've done in florida, red flag laws, which we've done in florida, eliminating bump stocks, which we've done in florida. before we get to all the more serious stuff, he would rule unconstitutional. i hope to speak to him as a father and look him in the eye and tell him, those few things would have saved my daughter. not the bump stocks, but raising the age to 21 and red flag laws. >> and, fred, was it -- was it clear to you that he could hear what you were saying to him? >> oh, listen, i have no doubt -- i know my voice. i'm certain he heard my words and i'm certain when he heard me say my daughter jamie was murdered in parkland, that's when he turned. >> fred, i've been in that hearing room many, many, many

times and i can absolutely back you up that anything said from that distance in that situation is easily audible in a situation like that and i've seen many people engage in conversations in those circumstances many, many times. so i'm sorry that it turned out the way it did for you today and i really appreciate you joining us here tonight, fred. really, thank you very much. fred guttenberg. >> thank you for having me, lawrence. thank you. >> fred guttenberg gets tonight's last word. "the 11th hour" with brian williams starts now. tonight, the explosive allegations from bob woodward's new book, describing the white house in the midst of a nervous breakdown, an unhinged president off the rails and lacking in basic knowledge about the world. mr. trump tonight is on the counterattack and so is the white house. on foreign policy, tales of a president ordering an assassination and questioning war strategy toward north korea. we'll run it all by the former cia director john brennan with

us