tv The 11th Hour With Brian Williams MSNBC November 28, 2019 3:00am-4:00am PST
knows how to talk turkey, the capitol coop, for birds with good taste that only taste good. open the 30 week in november. >> that's all for tonight. we wish you a very happy thanksgiving. tonight, the news refuses to take a holiday on this thanksgiving eve. for starters, the drama is deepening around the former mayor, tv lawyer and accused bagman for donald trump. the latest allegation is that rudy tried to loosen six figures from the ukrainian government while he was there as trump's back channel. tonight, the latest on what rudely is saying. and a report of a "washington post" calls into question that phone call between trump and sondland where the president insisted no quid pro quo. all evidence to the contrary. also tonight, the lights come up as impeachment hearings ramp up again a week from today. what do the democrats have planned? all of it as the 11th hour gets
under way on this thanksgiving eve, wednesday night. good evening once again from our nbc news headquarters here in new york, day 1,042 of this trump administration. new information continuing to swirl tonight around rudy giuliani after he was found to be conducting some sort of foreign policy while not remotely connected to the u.s. government. "the new york times" and "washington post" are reporting giuliani was pursuing business in ukraine while pushing for investigations that could have benefited president trump. the post reports giuliani negotiated to represent ukraine's top prosecutor for at least 200 grand. quote, giuliani began negotiations with lutsenko in the agreement. giuliani's company would receive payment to represent him as the ukrainian sought to recover assets he believed had been stolen from the government in
kiev. the post also reports agreements were never executed and there was no indication that giuliani was paid. swrooul for his part told "the wall street journal" today he was in talks with ukraine but it was for more money than that. he said lute searchco asked him to represent the mince triv justice and him personally on two matters. it goes on to report giuliani said he subsequently drew up two retainer agreements for the total of about 500 large and gave them to him. the next day he decided he couldn't represent him personally because he believed doing so would pose a conflict with his representation of the president. giuliani said the he declined the ministry of justice contract and was never paid a penny for that. on sunday, giuliani denied any financial interests in ukraine. >> i have no financial interest in the ukraine. i'm not going to finally profit from anything that i know of in
the ukraine. >> as we mentioned here last night, according to reports from nbc news, abc news, and "the washington post," giuliani has either done consulting work, delivered speeches or represented clients and governments in at least 19 foreign countries. there are their flags. back in september, giuliani insisted that his contacts with ukraine were solely at the request of our state department. >> i never talked to a ukrainian official until the state department called me and asked me do it. then i reported every conversation back to them. it's all here. right here. the first call from the state department. >> meanwhile, "the washington post" tonight is also reporting about another important impeachment witness. according to the paper, there are new questions about a phone conversation that gordon sondland said he had with the president on september 9th. remember sondland testified that during the call the president said wanted no quid pro quo with
ukraine? immediately after sondland's testimony, the president highlighted that at the white house. >> i said to the ambassador in response, i want nothing. i want nothing. i want no quid pro quo. tell zelensky, president zelensky, to do the right thing. >> but tonight the post reports this. quote, no other witness testimony or documents have emerged that corroborate sondland's description of a call that day. trump himself in describing the conversation has referred only to the ambassador's account of the call and the white house has not located a record in its switchboard logs of a call between trump and sondland on september 9th. that talking point that there was no quid pro quo, even though it's on the call summary and sondland testified to a quid pro quo, it has clearly been adopted by trump nation as they positively chanted it in unison
with the president last night. >> i want no quid pro quo. i want nothing. >> we're also learning information about that highly anticipated internal review of the russian investigation. "the new york times" reporting that according to people familiar with the draft of the report, the doj inspector general found no evidence the fbi attempted to place undercover agents or inform ants inside the trump campaign back in 2016. this will certainly bump up against the president's frequent and repeated claims that he was spied upon. >> they were spying. they were spying on our campaign. i think they were spying on the trump campaign. you can't say it any better than that. i'll go a step further. in my finance was illegal spying. unprecedented spying. the fact is they were spying on my campaign. using agencies to -- intelligence agencies to do it and it went right up to the top
and everybody knows it. spying. surveillance. trying for an overthrow. >> that kind of thing, here for our leadoff discussion on this thanksgiving eve, annie carney, white house reporter "the new york times." katy benner, justice department reporter "the new york times." and jonathan allen, our own nbc news national political reporter. good evening and welcome to you all. annie, what reporting have you on the current state of the trump/giuliani friendship relationship for starters? >> there's two prongs to it. trump himself seems to be standing by giuliani for now while the rest of the white house basically has wanted him thrown under the bus as long as he's been on the bus. i mean, he's been causing problems, they really view him more as a friend who's freelancing, easy that the way they viewed him the whole time than the real defense lawyer who is part of an overarching strategy here. remember since he admitted that
trump repaid michael cohen for this stormy daniels' hush money payment, he's been causing problems for this white house. but trump, for a variety of reasons, seems to every time he's asked about him seems to call him the greatest mayor that new york city ever had and a great lawyer and it might just be that he's too close to lose for trump. but there's no signs that he's doing the usual i barely know him. >> they were you are prized what he turned into when he was on the job. but then the subject of spying came back a few months back on the hill. people were stunned by the answer. i want to play the exchange and we'll talk about it on the other side. >> i think spying on a political campaign is a big deal. >> you're not suggesting, though, that spying occurred? >> i don't -- well, i guess you
could -- i think there's -- spying did occur, yes, i think spying did occur. >> so, katy, fastforward to two weeks ago we see waiting for the president to depart from the white house a kind of animated discussion going on in the oval office, including that man, the guy you cover on a daily basis, the attorney general. what's the chance, just thinking outloud here, that the ag went to give his brother a heads-up on the early look at the ig report to let him know, hey, boss, it's not going to find that there was spying? >> well, i'm not going to go inside of bill barr's head. >> i tried. >> but i will say he's the attorney general and he does brief the president on a variety of topics. what's interesting about the spying language that barr used in the hearing that you played is it's been adopted by the president. and we're showing that the report that's going to come out on december 9th, we have reporting that shows it erodes the argument there was the kind of spying that trump has been alluding to now for weeks if not months. which is there was a mole inside
his campaign. there was somebody inside who was taking notes and then delivering that information to the intelligence agencies. that's going to be knocked down in this report. now, whether there was surveillance, a wiretap of the former trump campaign adviser, yes. but the idea there was somebody ini did so inside the campaign, that is not going to be the case. >> if the sondland phone call in the trump story becomes unwound in a more concrete way, will that cost republicans support? >> i'm not sure it it will cost republican support in terms of member of congress, brian, but, you know, the veil that the president has over the idea that there was not a quid pro quo, that there wasn't bribery, extortion, that there was not a relationship between the probes that he is seeking and the money he was holding up has all but disintegrated already. that's the one sort of thin read that exists for him. and so sondland's call going
away with be, perhaps, important to some of the voters out there, particularly if democrats in congress can explain that to people in an effective way. and the other thing i would look at with that is even with sondland talking about that call, even if that call occurred, even if the president said that, what we already know is that for months from the testimony we seen, for months there was no explanation of the freeze on the money. and then once the president -- once the white house was aware of the whistle-blower complaint, once they were aware that the appropriators in congress were asking questions about that money, then the president is supposed to have had this discussion with sondland where he says, no, no, no, i don't want a quid pro quo. you know, the time element is clear in all of this. >> and, annie, on the subject of sondland, he is categorically denying allegations of sexual misconduct published and researched by pro publica. might this on top of the testimony or this alone put his
posting in jeopardy? >> not if the pattern that the president has followed with all allegations, me too allegations holds, which is that president trump has consistently when it's an ally of any sort taken the position of i believe the denial. so if he -- if he broke that pattern here, that would be a first. there will be attention here between trump saying i believe his denial and he has said i barely know gordon sondland. so we'll see how those two play together. but this president has consistently in and i believe the woman moment in our culture said i believe the man. >> katy, give us a status report on the branch you cover, and that's doj. there has traditionally been an invisible wall between president dollars a presidents and their departments of justice. that kind of gave way for a good long while in this
administration. are things going back to traditional norms? is there a bit more distance now between barr and the president and their official roles between doj and the west wing? >> i think there is speculation about distance between barr and trump especially because it was barr who was one of the people who advised that trump released the transcript of the ukraine call. but any distance, i think, was collapse and i week ago when barr gave a speech firmly arguing that presidential power is vast power. and that nothing trump has done has broken any constitutional norms. and, in fact, he argued that the democrats had done so. if there was distance between he and his boss, that would have closed it because it's the kind of defense that trump would have been looking for. so while it seems like that relationship has been healed, the rank and file of the justice department i will say is still extremely, many people have said that they are concerned about this speech because they don't necessarily agree with the attorney general's interpretation of the constitution and the oversight role that, for example, congress they believe should play over the executive branch which plays
into the legit mace cyst impeachme legitimacy of the impeachment. so you see the rift there between the white house and the defini department of justice has been healed. >> i'm going to put on the screen the op said that the former navy secretary wrote in the "washington post." i was fired as navy secretary. here's what i learned from it. this was a shocking and unprecedented intervention and a low-level review. it was also a remind thaert president has very little understanding of what it means to be in the military, to fight ethically, or to be governed by a uniform set of rules and practices. john, would you agree that this -- this is an example of two opposing ideas true at the same time? what happens when you cross trump and you can cross trump and live to tell about it? >> i think that's right. i mean, what happened here is --
is the navy secretary was bounced out of government and that liberated him to tell what he believes is the truth. and, you know, the words that he didn't quite use there, but i think are very important at this moment as the house is considering impeachment and the senate very likely will have an impeachment trial is rule of law. and what he's talking about right there is that the president, in his view, doesn't have respect for the rule of law. and what that means is the rule of law that has apoliticabiliplo everyone. and does not have applicability to the president himself. >> annie, one final question about someone we have now seen in photos on the white house grounds, all three business days of this holiday shortened week and that's jeanine pirro of fox news fame. what's going on here? >> that's a great question. she actually sometimes shows up
at the white house to surprising many people who work there. she's a, you know, one of the trump's most loyal defenders and, yeah, three nights in a row now she's broadcasting from the white house. i don't know if he has more interviews with her, but she often arrives there unannounced is the truth of the matter. >> all righty then. or as we call it, wednesday around here. annie, katy, jonathan, happy thanksgiving to all of you. thank you so much for coming on this thanksgiving eve. and coming up for us, the strategy for trump's legal team seems to be run out the clock. how has that worked for them thus far in a former federal conspirator here to talk with us about. and we're one week out from a second round of public equipment hearings. how will the democrats tell the story this time around? as the 11th hour is just getting started on this thanksgiving eve. st getting started on this thanksgiving eve. as a struggling actor,
i need all the breaks that i can get. at liberty butchumal- cut. liberty biberty- cut. we'll dub it. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ wayfair's biggest black fridis now on. ever yes! score unbelievable savings. like living room up to 70% off. storage solutions from $9.99. and area rugs up to 80% off. plus, tons of limited-time mystery flash deals. and free shipping on everything when you shop from thanksgiving through cyber monday. and we're just getting warmed up. our black friday blowout is happening now through december first. shop the event of the season, only at wayfair.com. - [woman] with my shark, i deep clean messes like this, this, and even this. but i don't have to clean this, because the self-cleaning brush roll removes hair while i clean. - [announcer] shark, the vacuum that deep cleans now cleans itself. i'm a regular in my neighborhood.
i'm a regular at my local coffee shop and my local barber shop. when you shop small you help support your community - from after school programs to the arts! so become a regular, more regularly. because for every dollar you spend at a small business, an average of 67 cents stays in the community. join me and american express on small business saturday, november 30th, and see how shopping small adds up. this melting pot of impacted species. everywhere is going to get touched by climate change. that could allow hackers devices into your home.ys
and like all doors, they're safer when locked. that's why you need xfinity xfi. with the xfi gateway, devices connected to your homes wifi are protected. which helps keep people outside from accessing your passwords, credit cards and cameras. and people inside from accidentally visiting sites that aren't secure. and if someone trys we'll let you know. xfi advanced security. if it's connected, it's protected. call, click, or visit a store today.
>> announce today a federal appeals court put a hold on a judge's ruling that former white house counsel don mcgahn must testify before congress so the government will have time to appeal. "new york times" reporter charlie savage points out that even though trump keeps losing in court incrementally his legal strategy is net net winning anyway. he writes, "like a football team up late in a game whose defense hangs back to prevent big plays
while letting its opponent make shorter gains, mr. trump's legal team is looking to run out the clock, putting forth aggressive legal theories often backed by scant precedent. the strategy risks periodic bad headlines in the short term and could lead to definitive rulings that hamstring future presidents, but it is demonstrably advantageous for consuming time. so let's talk about this. back with us again tonight, paul butler, a federal former prosecutor and georgetown law school professor. professor, you'll forgive me. i'm a new york giants fan. so all this talk about protecting a lead didn't make any sense to me. perhaps it will to you. you concede that this is working. tell us how courts and/or democrats in the house could try to combat this and put a stick in the spokes. >> so yeah, brian, trump is winning by losing. when he goes to court, he most
often loses. so on monday the federal judge ordered don mcgahn to testify. but here's the thing. it took her four months to decide. she wrote a 120-page scholarly opinion. and now the case goes to the court of appeals. and then maybe the supreme court. and this case might not ultimately be decided, the issue of which witnesses testify in the impeachment proceeding, until june, when congress most certainly will have already decided the impeachment issue. and that's how trump wins, by keeping these vitally important witness testimony from the american people. congress doesn't have a whole lot of options because of the tragedy of running out the clock. so what speaker pelosi has said is they're going to count this against trump in the impeachment debate including possibly an impeachment article about
obstruction of congress. >> and paul, let's say -- let's call it the mcgahn case. what if the mcgahn case ends up at the supreme court? what's your prediction? >> you know, again, i don't think that trump has an ideological stake in this. there are serious questions about the scope of presidential power and executive power. other presidents have made these same claims. trump's really looking out at it for his own interests. we know this because other presidents have tried to compromise. trump hasn't tried to compromise. so the thing is even though he often loses on the merits what else has he done? one reason that the republicans are sticking by him is because he has packed the court. he has packed the supreme court and he has packed the federal appellate courts. so some of these judges might actually have an ideological stake in the idea that the president of the united states
does have these extreme powers including some of what trump's argued. for example, we know that trump has said that the president is not subject to any kind of legal criminal process while in office. he can't even be investigated. again, that's an extreme point of view. but if we look at where trump is getting his judges from, the federalist society, this radically conservative right-wing group, a lot of those folks share those same extreme ideas. so irony of ironies, he might lose in all the appellate courts but might win based on this very conservative ultra right-wing supreme court that he's packed. >> well, professor, as usual, you've given us a lot to think about. we have a long holiday weekend to do that thinking. happy thanksgiving to you and yours. thank you very much. >> thank you, brian. >> paul butler returning to the broadcast tonight. and coming up for us, will impeachment follow members of congress home for the holidays as they say? more on that when we come back. - [narrator] meet the ninja foodi air fry oven.
you wanna give the best network. feliz navidad! (announcer) this black friday weekend, you can give america's most reliable network and the latest iphone. i'd probably give it to her grandparents so they can take tons of photos. my mom is amazing. if i got her one of these for christmas, she'd be freaking out. (announcer) now through sunday, get up to $800 off the latest iphone when you switch. with plans starting at just $35 per line. (squeals) yeah, exciting. (announcer) happy holidays from the network that gives you more.
when the founders provided a mechanism in the constitution for impeachment, they were worried about what might happen if someone unethical took the highest office in the land and used it for their personal gain, and i think we need to consult our conscience and our constituents and decide whether that remedy is appropriate here. >> house members are all back in their home districts this
thanksgiving week, where they have a chance to hear from those constituents, in some cases whether they want to or not. democrats are now trying to determine how to proceed on possible articles of impeachment with the latest polling showing americans remain split on the issue. with us tonight to talk about it, two of our returning veterans, karine jean-pierre chief public affairs office for move on. also an alum of both the obama campaign and the obama white house. also happens to be the author of the new book "moving forward: a story of hope, hard work and the promise of america." and david jolly, a former republican member of congress from the great state of florida who has since left the house and his political party. but he's with us. and we win all around. karine, i know the work of move on, your organization, in the past. are there plans to mobilize your organization into subgroups around impeachment the way we saw on health care and actually
the way the right organized in the field at the birth of the tea party movement? >> i'm so glad you asked that, brian, because there is. we have folks on the ground in key districts and also in key senate races where you have vulnerable republicans like in colorado with cory gardner, like with susan collins in maine where we are going to be very loud and clear with our message. is the president of the united states above the law or not? and so this is definitely very similar to what you just said, brian, to the stopping the repeal of aca. so we will be out there for the recess period. >> so congressman, this is probably my weekly chance to ask you the same question, and that is anything on your radar, anything of the known unknowns, the conceivable possibilities in this case, that would change republican minds?
>> i don't think in the house. i think we got an indication from the hearings over the last two weeks that republicans are going to vote to a person to oppose impeachment articles. i think the senate is still in question, and to karine's point some of those republican senators who will choose to side with party over country will very likely lose their seats in the next cycle. so forecasting just a bit, what all of this may mean, the one political consequence is republicans may lose the senate in 2020. you may have democrats controlling both the house and the senate in 2020, which makes the race for the white house that much more pivotal because this simple decision that has historic consequences could actually stack the deck for democrats all across the board in 2020. >> and karine, back to your point again, i remember the look on grassley's face at a town hall meeting when the tea party movement was coming up. these were folks to the right of him.
and he was shocked by the volume and the anger of the crowd on the subject of health care. so i'm just remembering that degree of shock. an incumbent republican from his right. >> i agree with you. i remember that as well. i was actually working in the white house the first two years, 2 1/2 years, of obama's presidency. and i remember those tea party kind of town halls or showing up at the town halls at many, many congressional districts and senate town halls as well. look, here's the thing, brian. there was a poll that showed 70% of americans believe that the president of the united states did something wrong. you can't get anybody to agree that today's wednesday nowadays. that's how divided we are. so that is what republicans are going to have to deal with in some of these districts and some of these states. is the president of the united states above the law or not? and clearly some districts will have different conversations,
but this is where we are. we do have people who are watching, who were watching the hearings, are now moving more steadily closer and closer to impeachment. and that's just a reality of the situation. >> and karine, just a quick answer to this. what's the viewer's guide to the judiciary now as they take the baton from intel? i think it's safe for everyone to admit they were rather embarrassed during the corey lewandowski appearance when they were last on live television. >> yeah. so now we're in the judiciary hearings phase of this, committee phase of this, and now they're going to lay out the legal case, right? they're going to lay out the constitutional argument. and we're going to see history here. we've never seen a president get impeached for national security. so that's the articles of impeachment that we're going to see. and so it is going to be probably a month-long process. and it's going to get voted out
of -- they're going to present the articles of impeachment and it's going to get voted out of the house, and i believe we're going to see a president who will be impeached on national security. >> and david jolly, forgive me. i buried the lead. mike pence came out for impeachment. i should probably add for clarity, the impeachment of bill clinton. this was reprinted today. an op-ed he wrote back then where he said "the challenge for the republican congress lies in the fact that the polls may be right. the american people may deeply wish to move on," there's a phrase, "and put this unpleasantness behind us. regrettably, the constitution does not permit such a national denial." hey, congressman, what do you make of that? >> hypocrisy. we know that after three years from mike pence and all republicans. the political vulnerability for republicans right now that the american people can see is by denying as republican leaders that donald trump did anything wrong they don't get to argue
for a lesser sentence. you see, when bill clinton obstructed justice, committed perjury, democrats said look, he shouldn't have done it but they argued maybe the house should censure him, it's not impeachable. what we're seeing from republicans is an unwillingness to even suggest it was wrong but not impeachable. that's a very politically vulnerable place to be when 70% of the american people as karine said think the president did wrong, it's okay to debate the sentence. the consequences. republicans would be on stronger footing. but they won't even get there. and in doing that and frankly what we're going to see in judiciary where they suggest this is a show trial and refuse to participate, brian, it's not now just donald trump that's undermining the basic institutions of our democracy. it is republicans. congressional republicans are tearing down the united states, not donald trump. if he refuses to show up, doesn't participate, it's the republicans in congress who will allow him to do that, who refuse
to stand up for the article 1 authority of the congress that are just as responsible as the president for tearing at the fabric of our democracy here in real time in 2019. >> you've given us a lot to think about. as usual, let's all resolve to take tomorrow off. with that karine jean-pierre to david jolly, very best and happiest thanksgiving to you and yours. thank you both for coming. >> same to you. >> coming up for us, the shift in strategy expected next week during this next round of impeachment hearings. a capitol hill-based preview when we come back. when i switched to geico. and this is how it made me feel. it was like that feeling when you go to taco night at your favorite restaurant. and they're the best-tasting tacos in the entire world. and just when you think it couldn't get any better, they bring you out another taco... ...cuz they made an extra one. ♪ extra taco! geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance.
fifteen minutes could save you there's a company that's talked than me: jd power.people 448,134 to be exact. they answered 410 questions in 8 categories about vehicle quality. and when they were done, chevy earned more j.d. power quality awards across cars, trucks and suvs than any other brand over the last four years. so on behalf of chevrolet, i want to say "thank you, real people." you're welcome. we're gonna need a bigger room. this melting pot of impacted species. everywhere is going to get touched by climate change.
♪ i can shine. ♪ i'mma do what i'm made to do. ♪ built for excellence. you start from the foundation up. the excellence is reaching dreams and chasing them at the same time. the best of pressure cooking and air frying now in one pot, and with tendercrisp technology, you can cook foods that are crispy on the outside and juicy on the inside. the ninja foodi pressure cooker, the pressure cooker that crisps.
♪'cause no matter how far away for you roam.♪ys.♪ ♪when you pine for the sunshine of a friendly gaze.♪ ♪for the holidays you can't beat home sweet home.♪ the united states postal service goes the extra mile to bring your holidays home. do you expect either the president or his counsel to show up? >> i never make the mistake of speaking for the president or his counsel. and i think it's well established that it's unpredictable. >> even members of the house judiciary committee like congresswoman debbie dingle,
democrat of michigan, don't know whether the president will send a representative to next week's impeachment hearing. melanie zanona is back with us tonight with a preview. she is congressional reporter for politico and a returning veteran on this broadcast. so melanie, give folks at minimum a kind of viewer's guide how will these hearings that we've become used to now in the intel committee, how will it seem different in judiciary? >> well, this phase is going to look a whole lot different when it shifts to the judiciary committee. the intel hearings were focused on fact witnesses, on gathering the evidence and really just putting it all out on the table. but when the judiciary committee takes over, they are essentially going to be trying to put this into context. the first hearing they're going to try to define what is an impeachable offense. they're going to bring in constitutional and legal experts. and democrats really know this is their last chance to move public support in support of impeachment. so i think both sides are going to be coming in guns a-blazing. you have members on both sides who are really fierce fighters for their respective parties. you have members of the freedom caucus on the republican side. you have members of the
progressive caucus on the left. and keep in mind, brian, this is the hearing -- the committee where earlier this year one of the members brought in a bucket of fried chicken as a prop to try to mock bill barr for not showing up and calling him a chicken. so we are expecting fireworks. at the end of the day this is a political fight. we're expecting political warfare. and this is the last chance to put a bow on all this evidence that democrats have collected. >> i'm glad you mentioned the chicken. every time i mention it i catch hell for it on twitter. be that as it may, two things are true. we continue to learn facts every day thanks to our colleagues in the news media. secondly, the democrats are up against a clock. but that's of their own making, of their own calculation. talk about this because the two may collide. they may call an end to this stage of impeachment while we're still learning things. >> yeah, that's absolutely the case, brian. in fact, there is a court ruling going on right now about whether don mcgahn has to testify or
not. it's been put on a temporary stay after a judge initially ruled that he does have to testify. but democrats are not interested in waiting around. and in fact, the timing that we're hearing right now on capitol hill is that there's going to be just two weeks of hearings in judiciary followed by a week of voting on the house floor on articles of impeachment. but there is still a lot of decisions that need to be made including how many articles of impeachment. is it going to be limited to ukraine and not touch on the mueller report? they also need to decide how many hearings to have and what the rest of the hearings will be focused on. so a lot of things that need to be happening. but it looks like democrats are on the fast track to get this wrapped up by the end of the year. >> and one more procedural question. let's say john bolton has a moment at the thanksgiving table and decides to start talking in addition to tweeting and says he's ready to come in. what's the mechanism to take the
testimony of an important witness like that while this is going on? >> intel has said they're open to the idea they could be taking more closed-door depositions even while the rest of this is going on. there's also speculation that maybe he could be hauled in for the senate trial and that's where you could hear him speak. but honestly at this point democrats don't know what to expect. he's sort of been a wild card dangling the idea in front of democrats that he might have something to say but we don't know. he's also promoting a book. so we'll just have to wait and see with bolton. >> hey, mel, happy thanksgiving to you and yours. >> you too brian. >> really appreciate it. >> thank you. >> melanie zanona from politico. coming up tonight reflections on a person who took on the president of the united states and won. although it did take a moment or two. not what's easy. so when a hailstorm hit, usaa reached out before he could even inspect the damage. that's how you do it right. usaa insurance is made just the way martin's family needs it - with hassle-free claims, he got paid before his neighbor even got started. because doing right by our members, that's what's right.
usaa. what you're made of, we're made for. usaa the best of pressure cooking and air frying now in one pot, and with tendercrisp technology, you can cook foods that are crispy on the outside and juicy on the inside. the ninja foodi pressure cooker, the pressure cooker that crisps. the unitedllaxin'. explorer card makes things easy. traveling lighter. taking a shortcut. woooo! taking a breather. rewarded! learn more at the explorer card dot com.
mr. nixon then tried to get the deputy attorney general to fire the special watergate prosecutor. and when the deputy attorney general wouldn't do it, he was fired. nothing like this has ever happened before. >> john chancellor, nbc news, in a studio just feet from where we are now. the deputy attorney general who held his ground during the watergate controversy was william ruckelshaus. he died today at the age of 87. he headed up the epa under two presidents. he was awarded the medal of freedom by president obama back in 2015. even that seems like a lifetime ago. as his "new york times" obituary put, it "for many americans the deeds of mr. ruckelshaus's varied career were all but eclipsed by his role in the events of a single night in autumn of 1973 as the political dirty tricks and cover-up conspiracies of the watergate scandal closed in on his boss, the beleaguered president nixon."
with us tonight pulitzer prize winner, presidential historian jon meacham. happens to be the author of among other titles "impeachment: an american history," to which he contributed with tim naftali, jeffrey engel, and peter baker. so john, in addition to learning that the early '70s were a bad era for television earphones that stuck out on camera and that mr. chancellor preferred copy on paper to the teleprompter in front of him, tell us about the man -- i heard a historian talk about ruckelshaus as a patriot's patriot. tell us about the mark he leaves on american society. >> that's a great description. he was part of a vanished breed. he was a moderate republican. he was of the rockefeller, prescott bush school of republicans who believed in fiscal probity but wanted to protect the environment and wanted to protect the rule of
law. what i would hope tonight and going into tomorrow is that every self-described republican supporter of donald trump would read that obituary very carefully and imaginatively project themselves to that ultimate moment of reckoning. do you want said of you that when the constitution was under ferocious attack you stood in the breach and stood for the work of madison, hamilton, and jay, or do you want to be seen as someone who took a dive? which easily could have happened on that october saturday in 1973. but ruckelshaus believed in the rule of law. elliott richardson, the attorney general who resigned, believed in it. it was robert bork, a controversial figure in his own right, who ultimately fired archibald cox that night. that's a separate debate for another night. but i think that someone like
ruckelshaus, and we're almost exactly a year away on november 30th from the one-year anniversary of the death of george h.w. bush, who also belonged to that company of men and women who believed in the system. they believed in the constitution. and they knew that at some point, however imperfect they were, however ambitious, however many things they got wrong, they believed at the end of the day that the system, the country, was the thing that had to come first and their own ambition, however much they had serviced that ambition, however much they had worked and driven through the arena with it, had to take a second spot. >> let's fast-forward to a week from today. second round of the hearings and a new and different committee for television voters -- viewers opens up. tell us what high crimes and misdemeanors may look like in 2019 because the only thing your
profession has in common with, say, a supreme court justice or a legislator is trying to figure out what the framers might have meant then as it applies to now. >> very interesting. gerald ford famously remarked, another one of that company, by the way, he was about to become vice president in that same era, ford said that a high crime and misdemeanor is defined as whatever a majority of the house of representatives decides it is at any given moment, and that's true. but it's a phrase from the english common law, it's an ancient phrase, one of the checks and balances on article two of executive power. very interesting that so much of the conversation in the intelligence committee hearings focused on the term bribery, that is the offering of a favor in exchange for something else. and so -- in the constitution, there are three things listed for impeachment, treason, which
has to happen in a state of war, bribery, the exchange of the now famous quid pro quo, the first time latin has been this, you know, used this widely since rome, so, there is one benefit here. or high crimes and misdemeanors. you're going to see more focus on the bribery. the judiciary committee is where the fabled watergate hearings unfolded. peter rodino, then republicans like charles wigins of california, water flowers of alabama, conservatives who wanted to stick with nixon but at the very end of the day, they were moved by the facts of the matter. and the question we're confronting now is, will the facts of the matter move those who have pledged their allegiance to president trump? >> and do you see, in the 30 seconds we have remaining, any reason for movement among
republican senators provided that's where this is headed? >> i don't. i've been struck by that. i like -- i understand the juror defense. they have to hear out -- they're using that as a block to buy some time, but to get 67 senators to agree to go to lunch is almost impossible and to see that significant a break with the president and the republican caucus will be highly unusual. here's hoping that there are some profiles in courage there who want an obituary like the one we're reading tonight. >> happy thanksgiving. thank you very much for coming on. >> same to you. coming up for us, it happened last night, but we are betting you are going to want to see it here tonight.
last thing before we go tonight. we have done this for so long for so many years and more decades than i care to remember in this business. some of our viewers have actually come to expect it from us. at this point in our thanksgiving eve broadcast, this is where we say, 55 million of you are traveling this thanks giving. this is where we remind you that this coming sunday is the single worst travel day of the year. this is where we show you the live radar satellite overlap of
this country by way of saying, we are so sorry if you're waiting for someone at home. we're so sorry if you're watching this on a seat back tv on a plane on a tarmac or worse yet, in an airline terminal, because here, this is the live graphic showing all the flights aloft over the u.s. right now. you have a lot of company up there in the sky. so, that's the topic of thanksgiving. what we really want to end on tonight is something that went by too quickly. some of the overlooked verbal stylings of our president at his rally last night in florida. he started out with the throwing of the red hats, because trump fans love them some red hats. they love their merch. and come to think of it, who among us doesn't love free merch? the president got right to business, including celebrating a big week for something called the slock rocket. ♪ there ain't no doubt i love
this land ♪ ♪ god bless the usa >> you believe it? i'm president, look. you know, we just had another slock rocket. the stock market, everybody's getting rich and i'm working my ass off. you're not having a good time getting up in the morning? all you do is find a new job and you'll get more money, most likely. and i opened up an apple computer plant, they make the new beautiful mac. whatever. and some day soon, we will land an american astronaut on the surface of mars, that's what we're shooting for. the space force. the deranged impeach -- think of this. impeachment. impeachment. a perfect phone call, i used that -- it's a perfect call. it was a perfect -- i want no
quid pro quo, i want nothing. what happened to hunter? i don't want to go on it too long, but all i'm saying is that it's a terrible hoax. they said, he went into the hospital and it's true, i didn't wear a tie. why would i wear a tie? if the first thing they do is say take off your shirt, sir, and show us that gorgeous chest. i always thought ron was a little heavy, right? i did. i thought he was a little overweight. and then i see him without a shirt one day and this guy is strong. and remember this, the republican party is the party of abraham lincoln, we forget. abraham lincoln. >> the 18th republican president since abraham lincoln, donald trump, bringing our broadcast to a close on this thanksgiving eve 2019. and so, that is our wednesday night effort. we wish you all a happy thanksgiving. thank you for being here with us. good night from our nbc news headquarters here in new york.
good morning and happy thanksgiving. the macy's day parade will be kicking off in less than two hours here in new york city. but will the weather ground bth balloons? plus, president trump and his friend rudy giuliani. why was the president's lawyer in discussions to represent the ukrainian government at the same time he was supposed to be representing president trump? and, new this morning, former navy secretary richard spencer unleashes a blistering new op ed in
IN COLLECTIONSMSNBC West Television Archive Television Archive News Search Service
Uploaded by TV Archive on