tv Andrea Mitchell Reports MSNBC July 25, 2022 9:00am-10:00am PDT
riders! let your queries be known. uh, how come we don't call ourselves bikers anymore? i mean, "riders" is cool, but "bikers"...is really cool. -seriously? -denied. can we go back to meeting at the rec center? the commute here is brutal. denied. how do we feel about getting a quote to see if we can save with america's number one motorcycle insurer? should flo stop asking the same question every time? -approved! -[ altered voice ] denied! [ normal voice ] whoa. ♪♪ this is "andrea mitchell reports" in washington. after eight explosive hearings
the january 6th committee is not done, collecting new testimony for hearings to come in september. today we'll be seeing never before seen footage from key depositions including jared and ivanka. they are still seeking ginni thomas, wife of supreme court justice clarence thomas, he was e-mailing john eastman, author of one of the failed plots to overturn the election. they say they may subpoena her. >> the committee is engaged with her counsel. we certainly hope she will agree to come in voluntarily but the committee is fully prepared to contemplate a subpoena if she is not. >> cheney is not deterred by the prospect of losing her seat in congress because of trump's organized opposition as punishment for her role spear heading the investigation. >> if i have to choose between maintaining a seat in the house
of representatives or protecting the constitutional republic and ensuring the american people know the truth about donald trump, i'm going to choose the constitution and the truth every single day. >> this hour i'll be joined by two members of the committee, republican adam kinzinger and democrat zoe lofgren. in ukraine, president zelenskyy is condemning russia's missile strike on odesa aday after agreeing to finally let millions of tons of grain ship out. he has not been seen or heard from in two days. his personal physician has still not briefed in person, but the president's doctor now says in writing that mr. biden's symptoms have almost completely resolved. we expect to hear a pretaped address from the president this hour after his fourth full day
of treatment with paxlovid. i'll be speaking to a leading climate policy expert. nearly 50 million americans continue to struggle through an oppressive heat wave. we begin this hour with congressman adam kinzinger and the january 6th committee's work. i want to play an excerpt from a new video released this morning featuring testimony related to president trump's january 7th speech that your committee showed excerpts of during last week's hearing. >> do you recognize what this is? >> it looks like a copy of draft of the remarks for that day. >> as you can see throughout the document, there are lines crossed out. there are some words added in.
do you recognize the handwriting? >> it looks like my father's handwriting. >> in my view, he needed to express very clearly that the people who committed violent acts and went into the capitol did what they did should be prosecuted and arrested. >> it looks like here that he crossed out that he was directing the department of justice to ensure all lawbreakers are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. we must send a clear message not with mercy, but with justice. legal consequences must be swift and firm. do you know why he wanted that crossed out? >> i don't know. >> they did not represent him or his political views in any form
or fashion. >> he also has crossed out, i want to be very clear, you do not represent me, you do not represent our movement. do you know why he crossed that language out of the statement? >> i don't know. >> congressman, this seems to be more evidence that president trump was pushing back against any condemnation of the rioters the day after the riot. what is your interpretation? >> it's more evidence that he sat for three hours not doing nothing, but proactively resisting pressure to do something, because i believe he wanted to see where this would go. it's like let's see how this develops over the next what would be three hours. and then, of course, very tepidly only when compelled and when he realized that the battle for the capitol had basically
shifted in favor of law enforcement did he come out with very weak statements. he still said this is what you get when you steal an election in a tweet. the next day, again, it's a matter of i don't want to disavow these folks. they're fighting for me. anybody that still believes these conspiracies that it was antifa or fbi directed, then obviously president trump loves antifa because he's continuing to say these are my people. look, this is just more evidence. we could have had a five-hour hearing on thursday, but we had to keep that to 2 1/2 hours. more evidence will come out. >> let's talk about ginni thomas. your colleague liz cheney said you are contemplating subpoenaing her if she does not appear voluntarily. how long are you going to wait to see if talks with her attorney bear fruit? >> that's an attorney to attorney conversation. our folks on the committee are
very good at knowing when they're being played versus when it's a legitimate negotiation. they will come forward and say if we get to that point, hey, it's time to subpoena. ginni thomas started out as an interest. we had a few pieces of evidence that we had seen. and then it just grew, particularly with some of the eastman memos and conversations reaching out to state electors. we want to have a voluntary conversation. she said i think somewhere in the media that she was eager to talk to the committee. that's it. come in, let's talk. we will subpoena her, but we prefer to just find out what she knows. >> if she said she's eager to talk, why is it taking to long to secure her cooperation and her appearance? >> that's a question for her and the lawyer. we heard through anonymous sources that secret service was eager to come in and testify on some of the limo incidents.
they haven't come in. it's one thing to put stuff through anonymous sources or to say something in the media, it's another when you have your lawyer saying we need to do this a little differently. if we have to subpoena, we will. we're going to get to the bottom of as much as we possibly can. hopefully the department of justice, not related to our investigation, is looking at potential crimes here. >> to the secret service. they still have not come in. they say they they cannot recover the text messages from january 6th. >> certainly an issue we're talking about. there's a lot of behind the scenes conversations going on.
we'd much prefer to get stuff voluntarily. could it be simply not keeping records? possibly. could it be a coverup? possibly. we don't know the answer to that. we do know there are some questions out there. we do know when you roll over technology, you're required to keep records. we want to get that answer as best we can. that's why we decided we're going to continue the investigation over the summer even as we begin to write some of the interim report. >> is that the key piece you want to nail down, the secret service cooperation and what happened to those texts? >> you know, it's a part. i mean, again, we still have people coming in around the edges. we're going to follow up with some witnesses that maybe gave us answers that now don't really make a lot of sense with more information that we've gotten.
so we have a great investigative team that has done a lot of work over the winter leading into these hearings and they're continuing it over the summer. this committee in congress is something quite historic. unfortunately, probably will never happen again in terms of pulling to the direction of justice. >> you've created a lot of information about what was happening during those 187 minutes. have you nailed down anything more about the president's communications with rudy giuliani during that period? >> you know, what we've presented is a significant amount. we know the conversation. obviously one thing we can't do and subpoena is get what was said over the telephone. it's usually what's called call detail records, which is who called who, how long it lasted. obviously if people turn over their text messages, we have that. there's probably going to be some information that without certain people coming in and
telling us the trut will have to be left to a little bit of mystery. what we've presented i think is compelling enough to say the president absolutely knew what was going on and he chose not to defend the article of the constitution. >> in terms of any further communications between the president and mark meadows, are you any closer to understanding those conversations? >> yeah. i mean, we have some understanding. there's some stuff that we haven't presented. you may see more in the report. you may see more in future hearings. first off, mark meadows has been one of our star witnesses. even though he's not cooperating, the initial tranch of texts.
he has refused to cooperate. we voted to hold him in contempt. the doj has so far not taken action. i hope they do. i hope he decides to voluntarily cooperate. but if he doesn't, he doesn't. we'll find the information as best we can. >> you said after thursday night's hearing that clearly the president has criminal exposure. can you fill in the context of what you think is criminal exposure and how disappointed you would be if doj doesn't follow up. >> look, as a not lawyer, i'm going to leave to the doj what reaches that threshold. i'll tell you looking at what we've presented to the american people, if there is not criminality in that, understanding that an attempt to overthrow the government was occurring, doing nothing behind the scenes communications, some of the stuff we're seeing out of georgia, then i don't know what is breaking the law. it's very dangerous to prosecute
last administrations. if you try a failed coup in this country and you are not prosecuted if there is evidence that reaches that threshold, i think that sends to the long-term viability of this republic a very bad message. nobody is above the law in this country. nobody. >> i want tcircle back to the secret service. does it survive the laugh test that they would do this ugrade at that critical moment in history and then not follow multiple advisories to save everything, which is standard anyway under the federal records act, and then that they would just be missing those two days?
so is that incompetence in management or is it something worse? >> so speaking as a committee member, we'll go where the facts lead us on that. speaking as my opinion, it doesn't pass the laugh test. was that a department decision, was it individual members' decisions? i don't know. it's either gross mismanagement or incompetence, or there's something else there. if you look at it on its surface, it really doesn't make a ton of sense, particularly with how the federal government is very serious about preserving records and especially on the day if you're the secret service, like january 6th. it was probably their biggest day since 9/11. joining me now, brandon buck, former senior advisor to house speakers john boehner and
paul ryan and kimberly atkins. brandon, there have been a lot of big revelations from this committee. the republican base according to polling still seems to be sticking with president trump. maybe they're reaching independent voters. all the witnesses pretty much have been republican insiders . how do you see this affecting the overall framework of president trump versus some other aspect of authority? >> let's assume donald trump is running for reelection. i think we have to assume that. absolutely this is hurting him. this is hurting him with independent voters. this is making people really question whether this is somebody who can win. i don't think it's hurting him enough that he's not going to be the nominee in 2024. he is coming to washington this week, giving a speech at his foundation. all of the republican big names are going to be there.
no one is running away from him. polls have shown that republican voters are not leaving him. that means republican leaders are not leaving him. if he gets in, he's probably still going to largely clear the field. maybe mike pence still runs. maybe ron desantis feels like this is his moment. we have talked so many times about maybe this is the thing that will finally get republican voters to move on from him and we're just not seeing it. these hearings have had a lot of political effect, but ultimately probably the biggest thing i'm looking for is whether there was a legal effect. it's not completely changing the tide in politics, but maybe a prosecution or at least an indictment of a former president could do that. >> let's talk about some of the things that adam kinzinger just said, particularly that ginni
thomas might well be subpoenaed. the timing would be in september right before the first monday in october. interesting timing. >> yes, it is. you see why the committee is taking this seriously. she has gone from saying she wanted to clear this up right away to really delaying the cooperation. as someone who was there, who was at the rally for at least part of the time, someone who was certainly urging state lawmakers and others to participate in this big lie election fraud theory that was disproven and given the fact that donald trump himself boasted about the need to get supreme court justices appointed in case he needed them for the election. that makes her such a central figure in this investigation. the committee would be remiss if they did not question her and if that requires a subpoena, that's search something that is on the table. >> jim, let's turn to the
president's health. how important is it to show the voters who are concerned about his age, that he is rebounding quickly from covid? we haven't seen him since friday. they say in a new statement from his doctor today that almost all of his symptoms are resolved. but we have not seen his doctor personally to answer questions in the briefing room, which has been standard when presidents are ill in the past. >> i think you'll see the white house address it today. i think they were very forthright getting in front of this in marked contrast to how president trump handled it. i think this is a difficult moment. the country wants to make sure the guy at the helm is doing what he needs to do. i think the white house has been really good about trying to share as much information. i would expect them to address it today at the white house podium. the country wants the president
to be okay. they're rooting for him. the president is in very good health and will continue to do his job. >> shouldn't they let the president's personal physician appear in the briefing room? >> i think they will. this happened on thursday and friday. i think this has been the standard practice in the past. there's no reason not to. i would be surprised if they fail to do that. >> brandon, let's talk about how republicans are reacting to all of this. you've got joe manchin blocking the president on climate. now manchin has covid today. again, the senate can't vote on anything. they're still down several senators. they've been snake bitten in this closely balanced senate.
what are democrats going to be able to do this summer? >> the next month is critical to the president's legacy in terms of legislating. time is up. we have august recess coming up. then it's election season when they come back. it's very likely republicans are going to be in charge next congress. i don't think it's overstating it to say the next three or four weeks, whatever democrats are able to get done is all joe biden will have to show for big legacy legislative items. they're whittled it down from something that was very expansive. now they're trying to get done a prescription drug bill, maybe a few other things on the margin. this is so critical. it's a reminder how razor thin their margin is. joe manchin is out. one senator being gone could throw away his chance to do anything the rest of the time. this has been a pretty big failure as a legislative matter.
all the things they promised their voters and i think it's a big reason why joe biden is in such bad standing. it's not just republicans against him. it's democrats who are sick of working to elect him and not having anything to show for it. >> kimberly, you being the lawyer in this panel, let's talk about merrick garland and whether you expect to see anything coming out of the justice department in the coming months, especially as donald trump may be declaring that he's running again. >> the truth of the matter is we don't know yet. we heard attorney general garland last week say, look, we are on this, this is a massive investigation, we are putting all of our resources on this. but the way that it works is not in front of the cameras. it is done in a way that everybody can't see it and people are frustrated with that.
we have seen members of the committee get increasingly impatient with not seeing actual action coming out directed at some of the key players in this probe. but only merrick garland holds the answer to that question. >> thank you so much. and monkeypox is now a public health emergency according to the world health organization. only two other diseases share that designation, covid and polio. so there are 16,000 cases of monkeypox around the world, nearly 3,000 here in the u.s., two of them children. yesterday dr. fauci says the white house is considering declaring it an emergency as well. >> we are actively discussing these things on a daily basis. ultimately what you want to do as we get more vaccines available to us and they are
coming quickly, we hope that by the end of july we'll have an additional 750,000 doses of the vaccine. >> many health departments are overwhelmed right now by the surge in ability to test and to find vaccines. they're scrambling for more vaccines. certainly new york city was this weekend as monkeypox is spreading. coming up, undermined. russia blowing up a crucial safe passage deal hours after it went into effect. what does that mean for future negotiations. whatreatment than warfarin... that's a trail i want to take. eliquis. eliquis reduces stroke risk better than warfarin. and has less major bleeding than warfarin. eliquis has both.s that e
eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. while taking, you may bruise more easily... or take longer for bleeding to stop. negotiations unexpected bleeding, or unusual bruising. it may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures. the #1 cardiologist-prescribed blood thinner. ask your doctor about eliquis. when moderate to severe ulcerative colitis persists... put it in check with rinvoq, a once-daily pill. when uc got unpredictable,... i got rapid symptom relief with rinvoq. check. when uc held me back... i got lasting, steroid-free remission with rinvoq. check. and when uc got the upper hand... rinvoq helped visibly repair the colon lining. check. rapid symptom relief. lasting, steroid-free remission. and a chance to visibly repair the colon lining. check. check. and check. rinvoq can lower your ability to fight infections, including tb. serious infections and blood clots, some fatal; cancers, including lymphoma
and skin cancer; death, heart attack, stroke, and tears in the stomach or intestines occurred. people 50 and older... with at least 1 heart disease risk factor have higher risks. don't take if allergic to rinvoq... as serious reactions can occur. tell your doctor if you are or may become pregnant. put uc in check and keep it there, with rinvoq. ask your gastroenterologist about rinvoq. and learn how abbvie could help you save. at xfinity, we're constantly innovating. ask your gastroenterologist about rinvoq. and we're working 24/7 to connect you to more of what you love. we're bringing you the nation's largest gig speed network. available to more homes than anyone else. and with xfi complete, get 10x faster upload speeds. tech upgrades for your changing wifi needs. and advanced security at home and on the go to block millions of threats. only from us... xfinity. millions have made the switch from the big three to xfinity mobile. that means millions are saving hundreds a year
on their wireless bill. and all of those millions are on the nation's most reliable 5g network, with the carrier rated #1 in customer satisfaction. that's a whole lot of happy campers out there. and it's never too late to join them. get unlimited data with 5g included for just $30 a line per month when you get 4 lines. [whistling] switch to xfinity mobile today. with technology that can scale across all your clouds...
it's easier to do more innovative things. [whistling] finding the perfect developer isn't easy. but, at upwork, we found her. she's in prague, between the perfect cup of coffee and her museum of personal computers. and you can find her, and millions of other talented pros, right now on upwork.com turning now to ukraine, where the country is trying to test whether russia will finally let grain shipments through the naval blockade. russia struck the port city of odesa. the missile strike came barely a day after russia signed that
rare agreement to let ships pass safely through the black sea. the state department saying the attack casts serious doubts about russia's credibility as the war pushes the world deeper into a global food crisis. thank you for being with us. they agreed to finally let the grain out. there are 20 million tons of grain that have been stored. some might be rotting there and they can't get the current harvest in. now that very night they strike odesa. >> let's recall back at the start of this, what did we hear repeatedly from vladimir putin and sergei lavrov, oh, we're not going to invade ukraine, we're
just conducting military exercises. this campaign has been a stack of lies. unfortunately, everyone felt a bit hopeful a few days ago when, as you correctly point out, an agreement was reached. and then flash bang caliber long range cruise missiles hit odesa. it not only undermines the credibility of russia and vladimir putin, but it casts serious doubt on this agreement. therefore, we need a plan b. i think plan b ultimately is going to require u.s., nato, western nations to actively get this grain out. final thought here. that grain, if it does not get to northeast africa, to the
middle east, it's going to create real food insecurity, potentially food riots. this is a very unsettling turn of events. >> how could the u.n. and other nato nations help? could they escort these ships through the blockade? it's heavily mined, as you know. >> indeed. fortunately we have history as a guide here. if you look back in the 1980s we did exactly this, getting oil out of kuwait and through the strait of hormuz, which the iranians sought to close. we put u.s. warships, guided missile frigates, cruise missiles. we could do the same thing with these massive grain shipments. frankly, the only reason vladimir putin even considered coming to the table and set up this agreement, the only reason is because he hears active
discussion of that kind of convoy operation. i think it's time to think very seriously about doing that unless the russians live up to this agreement they've signed. >> in fact, that was 1987. i was at the venice g7 summit covering ronald reagan when that deal was negotiated. >> indeed. i was an operations officer on one of the cruisers conducting those operations. you still have all your hair. i don't know what happened to me. >> things change. you know, this is all happening, of course, as we may be testing the promises of russia. russia is now saying, well, technically it wasn't a violation of the agreement. we may be testing that by sending a ship through. but this comes as, tragically,
two americans have died in the donbas region. could that increase the u.s. role in this fight? although we've told people not to go. >> indeed. any number of americans who step into this do so at great personal risk. while i salute their courage in doing this, i worry for their safety and for the impact it can have on these very delicate stage of negotiations. let's hope americans generally follow the advice of their state department. don't ride to the sound of the guns here. believe me, the ukrainians can handle this. we need to give the tools to the ukrainians to conduct these operations. put the pressure on putin in that way, continue to threaten the idea of cracking this blockade. those two things will help us
greatly in this conflict. >> admiral, thank you very much. a criminal referral. the january 6th committee building a case while the justice department is moving too slowly on its parallel investigation. slowly on its parallel investigation. new astepro allergy. no allergy spray is faster. with the speed of astepro, almost nothing can slow you down. because astepro starts working in 30 minutes,
while other allergy sprays take hours. and astepro is the first and only 24-hour steroid free allergy spray. now without a prescription. astepro and go. [whistling] with technology that can scale across all your clouds... it's easier to do more innovative things. [whistling] [zoom call] ...pivot... work bye. vacation hi! book with priceline. 'cause when you save more, you can “no way!” more. no wayyyy. no waaayyy! no way! [phone ringing] hm. no way! no way! priceline. every trip is a big deal.
super emma just about sleeps in her cape. but when we realized she was battling sensitive skin, we switched to tide hygenic clean free. it's gentle on her skin and out-cleans our old free detergent. tide hygenic clean free. hypoallergenic and safe for sensitive skin. fishing helps ease my mind. kinda like having liberty mutual. they customize your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. woah! look out! [sfx: submarine rising out of water ] [ sfx: minion spits bobber ] minions are bitin' today. [ sfx: submarine hatch closes, submarine dives ] ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ hello! minions: the rise of gru, only in theaters. hey!
new polling shows the january 6th committee has so far not been able to reach one of its main targets, republican voters. just 44% of republicans say they are watching the hearings. the majority of those watching, 80% are democrats. when asked whether donald trump should be criminally charged, 87% of republicans said no while nearly as many democrats say he should be. here are voters in a swing
district reacted to the hearing. >> i think they're going a little overboard. >> do you want to see donald trump run again in 2024? >> most definitely. >> i really don't believe that trump was behind it, only because he's a peaceful person. he's a peaceful man. >> are you following the hearings at all? >> yes. i don't find that they're doing anything. they just keep repeating the same thing. >> that's obviously just a sampling of negative voters. we don't know about others in that district as well. joining me now is democratic congresswoman zoe lofgren. thanks so much for being with us. i know that most of the witnesses presented were republicans. perhaps you are swaying independent voters. what about the hard core trump
base? >> in the end, i mean, republican voters are going to do what they think is best. they have that right. our job as a committee, our assignment from the house, is to find the truth and to lay it out completely. the day and the events leading up to the day and then make recommendations for potential legislative changes that could make us safer. i think it's abundantly clear if you look at the evidence that the former president assembled the mob and knew they were armed and sent them to the capitol. he also wanted to lead them to the capitol and wasn't able to do so. this plot began well before january. in fact, the former president said on numerous occasions that
there would be voter fraud before the election was ever held even though there was no voter fraud. that has been abundantly proven by republicans. with narrow exceptions, i think almost all the witnesses have been republicans who voted for trump. >> let me ask you about the secret service, because it seemed clear that the inspector general at homeland certainly does not have those personal phone rules. he looked at the official phones, did not find any texts from january 5th or 6th. are you going to try to get a hold, subpoena if you will, those personal phones from secret service members? >> we have a lot of questions about this whole secret service issue. first, the secret service was instructed on january 16th by the chairman of four committees
of the house with jurisdiction to retain all records. 11 days later they allowed the text messages to be erased. that's concerning. i have a concern about the inspector general as well. why did he wait months and months and months before telling us some of these texts were erased? and now i have a concern. i don't know whether there is a reason or not. i'm not saying one way or another whether there should be a criminal investigation. but it has had the effect of freezing the secret service from doing forensic analysis on these phones. we need them to do that. we need to get these text messages if we can. i'll say also that this is isn't the only evidence that was not promptly sent over to the committee. we have a lot of questions. i would say quite a few concerns
about the secret service. >> are you going to call in the outgoing head of the secret service and the inspector general and others to find out why this upgrade was attempted at this time during a difficult transition? >> our rules don't allow us to say which witnesses we're going to call, but i will say we're going to do a thorough examination including interviewing all of the relevant potential witnesses to this. we now know that the secret service was well aware early in the morning on the 6th that a giant mob, armed mob was assembling and we knew there had been efforts on the part of the former president to go with them. even knowing that, a rather small detail was sent with the vice president off to the capitol knowing that tens of
thousands of armed individuals were going to be there. how did that happen? >> very interesting question. how likely is it that ginni thomas is going to show up for questioning voluntarily? >> she made a public statement that she wanted to come in and talk to us. we would like to talk to her. her commuications with professor eastman are of particular interest to us. so we hope that she will do what she said she would do. if it's necessary to issue a subpoena, that's certainly something we would consider doing. but she first said she would come in voluntarily and i would hope that would still be the case. >> it's been several weeks since she said that. there's still no agreement. as the vice chair said over the weekend, are you contemplating subpoenaing the wife of a supreme court justice?
>> well, this has nothing to do with the supreme court justice. this has to do with ms. ginni thomas and the actions that she took. if we are required to subpoena her, i'm sure that's something we would consider. i would hope that she would come in. >> how many other loose ends do you feel that you have to wrap up in september? are more witnesses coming forward? >> yes. >> has the log jam been broken as has been suggested? >> there's more information coming in. there are more individuals coming in. obviously we want under the resolution that created the committee, there are two things, an interim report and a final report. likely in the fall it will be an interim report, because the minute you issue a final report the committee is dissolved. there are still people coming
forward. we may want to give them that opportunity to do it. but we hope to have a fulsome report. and a silent killer. the new push to give deadly heat waves the same intense coverage given to hurricanes or blizzards. waves the same intense coverage whooping cough, it's not just for kids. whooping cough is highly contagious for people of any age. and it hurricanes or ask yt about whooping cough vaccination because whooping cough isn't just for kids. there's a monster problem and our hero needs solutions. blizzards. nstorm. “shoot it?” suggests the scientists.
the climate deniers are really in some ways similar to all of those almost 400 law enforcement officers who uvalde, texas. confronted with this global emergency, what we're doing with our inaction and failing to walk through the door and stop the killing is not typical of what we are capable of as human beings. we do have the solution. >> that, of course, is former vice president al gore on "meet the press" not mincing his words about the severity of the global climate crisis and america's
inaction. hundreds of protesters took to streets in london demanding action after a week of smashing record temperatures. relief may some after devastating storms accompanying a cold front. in the west, hot and dry conditions g storms accompanying a cold front in the west, hot and dry conditions authorities now say is only 10% contained. joining me now is the director of thein adrian rockefeller foundation center at the atlanta council, which is focusing on climate-driven extreme heat around the world. it's great to see you. thank you for being with us. so you don't need more evidence what we are all experiencing. i'm in ansoee air-conditio studio, thank goodness, today, but that'ses a taking up a the lot of fossil fuels. the climate i crisis is here. with still solutions that can be
taken. what executive actions would you like to see the presidential take now that he's blocked by joe manchin? >> there are leaders everywhere under immense pressure to act now.es there is a raft of solutions. the first is to protect the most vulnerable people from the heat waves. you needab to know where they a and you node know how to best communicate. we believe that naming a heat wave and categorizing that heat wave where the categories are linked to your health, b not ju the weather, is the best way to protect lives and livelihoods from the heat right now. and medium and long-term, we need to make sure the billions we're investing in infrastructure is heat infored. so that the rails and the asphalt stop buckling under these temperatures. before we spend another dollar, is it going to withstand the temperatures because this is what we'll be facing for a long time.
>> how can we help the most vulnerable people? >> the first is to know where they are and how they receive information. so many b communities, includin miami-dade and los angeles, appointed chief heat officers. those have mapped the most vulnerable people where they are, the challenges they are facing, and how to best help them, which interventions can you take is how they get to work, is it about working outside, the hours they work, and so it's understanding where they are and how those impacts come. as you know, heat does not hit communities equally. so black and low income communities are disproportionately hit by this. we found in an analysis that $100 billion in impact came from worker productivity losses in the u.s. upss to 18% more of that impact came to black and hispanic workers. so it's an economic issue, it's a social issue, an equity issue,
and there aress solutions, but have to get cracking. >> what about the solutions for infrastructure? how do we build buildings that are less reliant on fossil fuels, that are cooler buildings, if you will? >> we started building our cities for an era that didn't have these temperatures. we have sealed windows and air-conditioning, black asphalt absorbs heat, glass that's reflecting on to the street and warming usit all. we can change the rooftop to a cooler surface. we can plant green roofs on top that cools the building. we can change the air flow when we redesign our buildings. we can plant urban forests. one of the most cost effective ways to cool our cities is using nature. open spaces and parks and water features, pop-up fountains, trees, nature is a superhero for sofling extreme heat. >> one of the things that is
always surprised me is that we don't -- all these years, we don't return to the prospect of going that direction. >> the reason it's so hot, we have to say it's obvious, it's because we're burning fos civil fuels.o burning fossil fuels. there's a direct correlation. we're just roasting ourseves. so looking at any energy source that does not heat the planet that way just makes good sense. so i see this conversation coming back. younv see some nuclear plants coming back online in other parts of the world and modular nuclear, it definitely should be on the table. >> you think we can reach our goals by 2030 of 30% reduction in co2? which we have committed to given the trump administration rolled back so much ask now the legislation has been blocked in the senate by a democrat.
>> it's tough to see. but it's not impossible. state and local governments are taking all sorts of actions as well. so there are some good new stories inso here about the job growth and renewables and the nature-based solutions absorbing a lot of the emissions we're having. but it's a major blow. it's going to take more than we expected, and it will test the edges. so i'm cautiously optimistic, put it's a very bitter pill. i will admit. >> we can start naming storms and start appointing heat officers and start doing things with cooler buildings and doing it at the local level. but ultimately, we have to have some federal action. thank you so much. >> thank you. we are expecting prerecorded
remarks from president biden soon. nbc news learnedti those remark were recorded earlier this morning. he's been suffering from covid and they will be delivered to the national organization after black law enforcement. it's onte tape for playback. he's expected to call out politicians for calling out for law lienforcement, but not helpg on an assault weapon ban. he's expected to speak out against former president trump and hispe inaction on january 6. that does it for this edition of "andrea mitchell reports." thank you for being with us. we'll be back here tomorrow. remember to follow us online on facebook and on twitter. "chris jansing reports" starts right after this quick break. n . n . "chris jansing reports" starts new poligrip power n . "chris jansing reports" starts aleve it, and see what's possible.
hold and seal. right after this quick break fear no food. new poligrip power hold and seal. i'm still riding toward what's next. fear no food. even with higher stroke risk due to afib not caused by a heart valve problem. f there's a better treatment than warfarin... that's a trail i want to take. eliquis. eliquis reduces stroke risk better than warfarin. and has less major bleeding than warfarin. eliquis has both. don't stop taking eliquis without talking to your doctor as this may increase your risk of stroke. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. while taking, you may bruise more easily... or take longer for bleeding to stop. get help right away for unexpected bleeding, or unusual bruising. it may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures. the #1 cardiologist-prescribed blood thinner. ask your doctor about eliquis.
when i make decisions as a leader, it's not about me or the folks that are here. it's about the next seven generations coming behind us, making sure that they have the ability to move forward. prop 27 will help small rural tribes like mine get a seat at the table will be transformational for my tribal members.
taxing online sports betting gives us an opportunity to really enhance the lives of our tribe and strengthen the future of our people. vote yes on prop 27. riders! let your queries be known. yeah, hi. instead of letting passengers wrap their arms around us, could we put little handles on our jackets? -denied. -can you imagine? i want a new nickname.
can you guys start calling me snake? no, bryan. -denied. -how about we all get quotes to see if we can save with america's number one motorcycle insurer? approved. cool! hey, if bryan's not gonna be snake, can i be snake? -all: no. good afternoon. i'm chris jansing live at msnbc headquarters. today the january 6th committee is sending multiple and clear messages that far from taking a break, they are amping up pressure and doing with an expassive reach. the latest but not the only development is new video released by a committee member a few hours ago. in previously unseen testimony, members of trump's inner circle, including members of his own family, detail what trump
IN COLLECTIONSMSNBC West Television Archive Television Archive News Search Service The Chin Grimes TV News Archive
Uploaded by TV Archive on