we will act as we see fit. now this is a statement that is of course ambiguous somehow with the israelis understand this as the fact that if let's say the us does launch an aggression against iran that hizbullah might take part despite the talk of the fact that hizbullah has been weakened, netanyahu said hizballah has been weakened, but you also have statements out by the israeli military saying that they are mobilizing near lebanon and they are... saying and warning hazbillah not to act, so they also see that hazbillah can act, or how do you see or how do you explain the statement made by sheikh naim qasim that we will act as we see fit? what does that mean from hizballah? well, it means that we support and encourage and we are with iran, in all means, in all states.

and the israelis and the americans, they know that, not only condemning or no, no, we are part of this idea, we are part of this body of movements who are trying to get rid and liberate the region from this despotism of the american despotism and the israeli criminal. regime, so hizbu allah vote for long time, for four years or more against the the existence, the occupation of the israelis in lebanon, and of course the americans, they know that hisbullah will never talk to them, will never say yes to them, to their political agenda in lebanon, of course lebanon has its, its state.

its situation, this diversity in lebanon, this this regime in lebanon might prevent hizbullah from being part of the of the battle, but hizbullah in terms of media, in terms of saying, in terms of word, word to say word, has has a meaning in the battle, and of course hizbullah will continue it. course and its course in this life and in in the political arena, in the political battlefield also will continue in supporting iran and it's right to defend itself and not only to defend itself, but also to cooperate with these movements in order to lift all kinds of problems from the region. iran is part of this region.

whatever some of the arabs and some of the lebanese they say persians and magis and all these things, they they are not convincing the peoples who know the right and the wrong, the bad and the good, the just just and injust and despotism, they they know peoples now they know and the americans when they say and these statements of hizbullah. of of course will influence the this new generation in where to go, where to be and how to support and why to support iran, and i guess we have, we have this this whole teachings of this school is doing good, implanting and spreading and trying to create a new

way of looking towards the world and people and the issues and palestine that's why in this meaning they know that's why they want to extinguish this kind of school because with this school the issues of the humanity can live and continue the issue of palestine will continue living in the hearts and the minds of the people. they are trying to cut and to erase this school because they know that this school is the source of of freedom of democracy of living again of of having a new history, a new chapter in history full of pride and prosperity and democracy and development unlike.

what they are saying, they they bring back these, these these words, these concepts and they work negatively contrary. victory to what they say, they prevented development from iran and from these countries, even the countries who pay, and they prevented the palestinians even with oslo accord, they should, they should have palestinian state, and lebanon, the israelis should withdraw from lebanon according to 1701. in syria, new regime and said they wanted to go to naturalization with the israelis and the israelis going to occupy, you see, they they don't. say the good thing and they don't do the good thing, so sometimes they say, well hillary clinton confessed and said we are not going, we are not going through democracy, we are not going for democracy, neither for freedom in iraq and said, he he

she said we we were lying, we were lying and they were lying, actually they were lying, they divided people, they encouraged people to... their intention is bad and their minds are bad, whatever they say and bring of of slogans, political and humanitarian and these ngos and whatever you you say, these people are lying,

hypocrites, hypocrites by by nature. all right, let's take a look at, i mean these statements from sheikh naim qasim, if how they reflect the resistance faction or the... resistance alliance in the region, the israelis, like i said, they have been bargaining on the fact that they weakened hamas and ghazza, they weakened the resistance in the west bank, they weakened hizbullah as they say, um, but lebanon is still under aggression, it's not just an issue about the support for iran, iran does not need the support, we can see that very clearly, iran is striking its targets very precisely, it does not need the support of hezballah, however, lebanon's still under aggression, we know now... that there was a drone attack in habbasi in the area of tire uh and this is continuous assassinations of individuals here in lebanon. in addition to the occupation you also mentioned there's continuous occupation uh we hear the sounds of drones over the capital beirot almost on a daily basis and so the aggression continues the violation of the sovereignty

continues uh would we see that there could be if issues and large that there could be also another confrontation and a faceoff once more with resistance in lebanon and the israelis? well, everybody should know that iran is the stumbling block of the capitalism in the world, of the west and the united states and their projects in the region, like this project, permanent project, they think that it's permanent, the existence of this occupation in palestine, and imam khumaini taught us, no to come david. no to surrender to the american dictations, no to wars between us, but the war against israel, we should unite that in order to defeat israel and and say to the west, whatever you do, this is

part of the of the western planning for the region from py speko and before till now and bell for declarations and these things, so what do they expect, hizballah in all its power whatever they have the the the this movement hizbullah whatever this this party have of power they should and they will use it in in the battle in the battlefield in this in the south and in the dahi the suburb and the southern suburb and in b and in all lebanon so i they know they know that the idea of the liberation and confronting the israelies in the battlefield will continue with hizballah with hamas with jihad with a new new faction new sec secs of of resistance things

will continue in the arab world look they know now they have been taught by imam and "power will defend rights and rights and liberation, and we are not gonna sit in any corner in this world and say, well we should liberate, no, we should work in order to reach a point where we can say, now we are satisfied, i would say, i would say whatever they think that hizbullah and hamas." are losing the the momentum, losing the battlefield and

losing their power, they are more power, more decisive than what they think, and because now we see the lebanese and these marters in in the south, they were not defeated, they did not lose the the battles and they stopped the israelis on the borders. and they know that at any moment these fighters might go back to the battle and will fight until their martur them and they will continue doing that and tens of thousands will do that. one of the the most remarkable signs of the defeat of israel that these teachings are the spirit. of these fighters, and these fighters will continue, and if

you interview them and talk to them at any moment, they will be back, they will return to the battle ground, to the battlefield and will say, we are gonna hit the israelis. this idea is is a permanent idea, the most strongest idea in the in in these ideas in in the region. "the occupation will not succeed in saying that we are gna stay here in lebanon or in palestine even or in in syria, because there are fighters taught by great men and symbols and very very honored and greatly honored, especially sayid nasrallah and other marters of the leaders s saniar and also haniah and and others respected or respected, i i would ask a question, would trump who are trying to impose all these

sanctions and ideas on the world, is he respected in the world more than sinwar or sayid nasrallah, i would do a pall or a vote, and whether netanyahu even in his people, in his people, well he thought that he he said yesterday, i thought the israelies would not stop with me in this battle, and so so he doubts himself, yeah, he doubts himself, sayied nasarallah once said, i am, i was never certain in my life, like at this moment in the battle with the israelis against the israelies with palestine, he was always certain of what he has been doing. so these are not certain because they are not right, they are

deviating from the human from the humanitarian track or path or right right sense of or the common sense of good things, they are not, they are not good, they are not good, so the this is this is the fact that people in a leban and in palestine and the arab world, at some point, especially after this battle, things will change, and i, i will say change will for better, and america is defeated, america in this battle is defeated and perplexed, and they don't know what to do, and trump every day, his statements or he doesn't know what to say, whether he would go to war or not go. to war, he is afraid from doing so, netanyahu is really put

himself in a in a very very unknown, very unknown destiny in in this in this battle, i guess they have taken themselves into a great web, and the iranians they would have liked that except. that they have been taken by uh yeah by trick and conspiracy deception yeah so of course this is part of the plot that was that we heard it from uh some iranian officials saying that this is all part of a plot uh and sheikh naim qasim also said that this is part of a plot of us israel to try to uh weaken iran whereas it will not be weakened uh we heard from the uh former the the advisor to sayid ali khaminai uh mr shami khani was also in hospital we learned

in his there was a failed attempt for assassination and he said that he is ready to fight even now and he says i tell the enemies that playing with fire will end with your defeat uh, as he said, we also have new statements out for the iranian foreign minister, and he said that the western countries uh did not denounce this aggression, and it's up until now, we did not hear clear words of denouncement, although based on un standards and based on the ii ea, iran is defending itself and is undergoing the aggression, of course it is the aggressor the... "the aggressor aggression is against iran and it did not act in any way against any country in the region. we also have a statement where the foreign minister of iran said that the united states is a partner in this aggression with the israelis, even if it is not openly taking part as it is, and

of course how significant that is, he has also said that we believe that all the countries will." try to move away and be neutral in this fight because of our resistance and they see the extent of our resistance and that we are not ready to go for any war under fire and we will not go and the only way we can go to negotiate is for this aggression to stop. do the the the us understand the this iranian stance that this is not just a propaganda that this is not just a uh part of a uh media campaign that they really will stand to the end and will not go for negotiations under fire. well trump once said during the negotiations before this aggression said the iranians are negotiating with the great consistent and insistent and persistence and they are a very

hard negotiators and they know that they the iran will not will not go back, will not, will not retreat from these negotiations and from the retaliation, so these two things they go together, the iranians are massives in in teaching diplomacy, and the the americans are not, although they they they think that they are doing good. in terms of diplomacy, no, and in about the war, they are the the originators of this war, the americans are the originators, they are the helpers, not the helpers, these are, these are deployed and helped and supported by by the americans and corella who did all all these maps and yesterday 80 uh...

80 war force plane took what all kinds of all kinds of arms, artilleries to to the israelis, so we are talking about not only a partner, it's participation, no, they are, they are the one, they are the party that has done all this, initiated, planned and saying, well continue here and there, and they are... also leading the media, the the the ideas, the the machines and their their airplanes there in in the gulf and in the red sea, so they are the leaders of this battle, but they they are losing because they they did not expect that iran will be in this strength, in this good.

way of dealing with issue and they they thought they have damaged all these these rockets and missiles in iran and the storage of these, but they they they were wrong, they were pluffed in some manner with the tactiques, the the military tactiques of of the iranians and they the iranians forged many places for these missiles. and they were fake and they thought the israelis that the that their aeroplanes have hit these places, but actually they were fabricated. they were fake places, so now we are having, we should of course learn from this battle that the iranians are not easy with these

tactics, tactics and strategies and i think this is the first battle in history of this zionist except for the movements and in terms of the regional battle. "this is the first battle israel go for for it, so even the battles with the arab regimes is not considered a battle, this is something very different even in 1973 it was a semi battle, half battle, but with iran now it's a battle, and who is participating and this combination of the west, britain is there, france is there, german." is there are there and also the americans are there and of course every every one of these natos and i i here in this this

context i would really blame some of the iranian neighbors who were not sincere in dealing with the with the with the issue with this war with this aggression. against iran in a very loyal manner, in a very let's say cooperative manner with iran. iran did not bring any harm to these to these countries, on the contrary, they were always trying to have a certain diplomatic way to extinguish all kinds all problems with the gulf and with turkey. and with the with russians, they have treaties, they have strategic even cooperation, but unfortunately in this battle

they should have stopped in a very firm way, in a very courageous way with iran, because if god forbids allah, forbids this that if iran treated or retreated for for a while these countries will be hit and the russians know that the iranians helped them in terms of drones in their battle against ukraine and if also iran is defending russia by having this battle with nato israel is part of the nato though it's not a member official member, but it's part of the strategy of the nato and

they are they are a member in this mentality to defend them, they are defending them, the nato is led by the united states and the western countries are very weak members in this, all them and they have been led by the... united states and israel is one of the states, yes, it's stronger in the political mind, the american political mind than any of the nato countries, it's a state in the united states, it's not a state inside the inside the the european nat, the european state inside the in, that's that's the difference and it's it's a it's it's... for them, it's for the israelis to be in because of their lobby in the in in the united states. we have statements yesterday from mr. mhsin rizai who was former head of the islamic

revolutionary guards core, he came out also, now he's an advisor to said ali khamenei, he came out in his military uniform, he clearly said he covered some very important issues, he said that the... nuclear sites are safe, although the israelis said that we were able to destroy big ports, parts of the nuclear sites, um, he said there are no casualties there, there are no damages, they have been evacuated, and so the iraq and natans uh sites have actually been evacuated from anything which is nuclear, uh, perhaps this was done in order to to say two things that they first of all will not be causing any nuclear damage or any nuclear... leak or pollution, but he also said that the uranium enrichment sites have also been evacuated and transported someplace safe to a safe site, so that also is very much.

telling, it's important that the israelis are talking about deception, they are boasting about the use of deception, we heard uh from the israeli ambassador to the us saying that what we just did, that this was something that would make the pagers explosion, the terrorist explosion of the pagers in lebanon seem very simple, we saw that there was assassination of course of leaders who, you said are ready for them for martterdom, they believe that this is part of the path, that this is part of the sacrifice, but when it comes to those nuclear... sites that iran was actually heading of the israeli um attacks and it was not taken by surprise, they understood that there was an israeli threat and this is why they removed them to a safe place for various reasons, how do you look at this tactic and do you think that they move them around in iran, that iran itself is large enough to be able to have safe places where the israelis can never reach, well of course uh yesterday i was asked about the uh

american intervention in order to hit fordo, fordo. i said, and i repeat it now, i am sure if the americans are sure that they can hit for do and destroy it, they would have done it, they would have done it next day, or they would have departed from. they are not sure, fordo is very strong, is a stronghold there, it's it's very let's say deep inside the the the mountain and they don't have actually they don't have the bomb that's...

might penetrate the the height and the the the rocks in order to reach fordo. fordo is a very stronghold fortress and the americans and the israelis will not reach there and the richment is is gonna continue. they will not, they cannot also say that's why that's... why trump is trying to trying to insist that the iranians will come, will come and say we are we are not gonna rich, they should come and they are hitting other places and they have, they haven't been able actually to to bring harm, very harsh harm to to the to the iranian places sides, so we are here at the safe side, the...

the iranians and these scientists they know how to deal with these things, the iranians are very bright and they know they know how to protect these enriched uranium and that will serve, they they need them, they need them, that the americans are afraid if the iranians are afraid from nuclear arms, if the iranians... wanted to do so, they have been, they were able to do so, and many of these people in iran said, if we wanted the nuclear bomb, we could have done it long ago. yes, now talking about nuclear bomb, now we understand, of course, said ali khamenei had clearly said that this is an issue that is prohibited by islam, for various reasons, and of course it we understand that based on some experts, it's not just the threat.

against it's a threat against humanity in itself, everything lethal is against islam and this is an issue that perhaps needs to be repeated uh the fact that also islamic countries it is prohibited to begin any sort of war even if it is um a preemptive and this is why we saw that uh iran was although it was threatened by israel for so long it did not begin any sort of war again from 1996 the uh the well the the sides, the nuclear sides in iran, yes and so the issue of the turns is more important for islamic countries than actual wars, they always try to stop wars, not to go for wars, this is an important issue, but we also see