tv Prime Interest RT November 1, 2013 2:29am-3:01am EDT
and i am of beyond belief to think that that can be done to a protest in a cult but. i think that dolt succeeded james glanton doubts about the credibility of the story. as a swedish filmmaker and journalist i always took the right of freedom of speech for granted. but i think came to learn it depends on the story you want to tell. in two thousand and nine i had made a film about a court case in los angeles where banana workers from nicaragua were suing gold food company for the use of a banned pesticide i think claimed made them sterile along with other serious health effects and in november two thousand and seven the jury in the los angeles court delivered
a groundbreaking verdict was found liable for malice and misconduct. my hope was that this story would bring about better conditions for the farm workers to produce by us today for ever the message was extremely unpleasant so to get a film out would prove to be a journey full of obstacles. out . in the beginning or made two dozen nine we were ready to launch my film by anonymous. one morning a huge package from the us was delivered to our office. only a few days earlier we had launched the film's website announcing that we would have our world premiere in competition at the los angeles film festival.
inside this package was a cease and desist letter from a law firm representing dold food company claimed that facts in my film were based on a fraud. that the banana workers were lying. i said what's going on here we're not out to get them to get. him in the story convinced that this was a misunderstanding. as they see the film everything will fall into place. when the cease and desist letter came in from dole i was also mentioned and i guess in some way i was kind of flattered it was like wow ok nice i'm on the rich on the radar for a dollar it's really nice to see but. my wife really sort of looked you know brought
me back to reality and said you know this is quite serious you know we could lose the house we could lot of things could happen doe decided to go after everybody so they could stop the film and so in doing so they threatened everybody threatened me they threatened los angeles film festival by going to all of the major sponsors including the l.a. times and i think it was important that we all had a united front. as we started to step towards you know the film screening at the festival. i wanted to tell the whole world what was going on but i didn't so when i was interviewed for a local swedish t.v. news i did not give the reporter to full story i didn't tell her about the letters from told that we might not be able to show our film. i was doing a segment on this film that was about to compete at the l.a. festival. all sound a few days later i received
a long letter any mail from dos b.r. agency in washington. that is to want to look at the documentary was based on false accusations and lies my initial reaction was fear i was scared to think it made me very uncomfortable i mean this was a tiny segment aired by a local news station how did they find it. i contacted the agency and that put me in touch with those vice president i have made it very clear to this producer and to the film festival given that there are no doors to the absolute basis on which they've built this trial and they're going forward with it very well and they're going to get sued to they're going to be exposed to kind of damages and they are still remember when i asked him what exactly is faked. what lies are you referring to or do you try to stop me just went on and on that made me
angry the film is based on a sham that's the point but have you seen the film or share or told you know. we didn't tell anybody. to film. that created the first headline. front page. page of the. day this is. easy this this is. what. the writer has seen. i want to talk about pesticide use and its impact on. successfully
entire. i want to say. we feel like. very silly to say. we. i don't very well it's unclear to us there's anything. there. that will sit by joel guys or our early trying to be addressed. and especially likely to ask you. guys los angeles they're going to serve you with us are obvious surprise if they doctored yes. i've been successful in court the same week to judge concluded that. case probably had committed fraud the conclusion was based on testimonies from witnesses stories. so what happens if the central premise that your documentary that's just about to
be released turns out to be a fraud. that. they're basically created in and. they sort of support the people getting their piece of that wow so have you finally seen the documentary and i have to admit i did not. and could not defend themselves publicly instead the journalist attacked me and my film would one question why don't you change your film. is found to be a fraud i told them that this was still an ongoing legal fight and that i didn't believe decent usage they're attacking you as a filmmaker. there. everything became personal it wasn't just
about the film is really going after you. and if you look back everything. was actually they moved it off of them because they couldn't get after him to the film because. to them is damaging because you know the c.e.o. from then had you know admitted his guilt right there you know in court did it occur to you and mr rennes all that me just got to use d.c.p. until you were sure your workers wouldn't be affected this general waiting for the evidence to pile up. the first tool pass but you still don't know if our film will be screened at all. festival board calls us to an urgent crisis we did receive new letters from don't. assume they're not even on
a plane. and they make it very clear to us they will no longer defend my from. my accomplices dispraise. to modify me to. just the bottom line. it's not really finished but they. think they will it's so hard not to risk their own organization the fessor game up with different options but the options are never going to be in your favor you know the options were i mean i was in the room with the options where they were going to show up next year where you can get distribution or why don't we just show clips and we can do a discussion around it but all along that was going to do anything for your for your film and then also we fell. in on the publicity side all that said to dole was yes you're right so i'm just going to show clips so that i don't get in trouble.
the festool keeps changing the conditions we have to accept that the film has been taking on a competition not a legal disclaimer defending those few of those films. it's going to be read before the screen. if we don't accept these terms there would be no world premiere. i've got to find a disclaimer text in my hand just as i am arrived to defeat the festival is given in to pressure from don't publicly announcing that the banana workers are liars i tried not to read it because i knew it would be good stuff so basically if you say i'll say it is a microcosm eleanor in a watch out that is this is that. the dole vice president michael connor and his lawyers and right these are the guys you know been putting pressure on us for over six weeks not to pull the film.
i. told you my language or what i will only react to situations i have read the reports to let me know what is the know i will leave that to the state department to comment on your latter point someone please say it. because i'm going to. do no more weasel words when you vade a direct question be prepared for a chase when you have a bunch be ready for a bad freedom of speech and little down the freedoms of costs.
wealthy british style. markets why not. find out what's really happening to the global economy in these kinds of reports. recently a un report and investigation by human rights groups make it abundantly clear obama's policies may constitute war crimes under international law the white house dismisses these claims it would appear washington reserves the exceptional right to murder with impunity. dramas that can't be ignored. stories others refuse to notice. the faces changing the world.
so picture of today's leaves. on demand from around the globe. local. t.v. . ok great thank you all i'm so sorry like that contingent there getting us going here. welcome to the fifteenth annual los angeles film festival presented by the los angeles times i'm don hudson executive director of film independent and i also walking you to tonight screening and case study of bananas the screen is presented by film independent film and it is los angeles film festival and frederick burton the director and i want to introduce to you right now thank you.
i know i want to thank you for the first. time. i want you to read the first you want to introduce yes i will but i want you to read this first i will i mean. you know. this was all i was told all right it was actually one of the most shocking things i've ever seen this sort of putting a documentary into a special ghetto of its own declassifying it and then. actually feeling like there were surveillance on me in the audience as we lined up and were forced to read a document that disavowed this thing and i actually felt completely ashamed for the entire los angeles movie industry and the festival i. it was beyond belief to think think that that could be done to to a participant in a film festival before you watch this film you need to know that serious questions have been raised about its credibility. the judge specifically mentions in her
ruling that the witnesses you will see in the film tonight from the trial lied under oath presented false employment records and presented fraudulent evidence of sterility none of this is reflected in the film you are about to see as a result there seems to be little question that the version of reality the film portrays does not match the reality that emerged in the courtroom. we are not eager to be sued that is why we are showing this film out of competition as a case study to eliminate a timely exploration of what makes and doesn't make a responsible documentary the language was basically saying we're going to show this film as a test case we don't believe it's true we don't believe this filmmaker. so just be warned that what you're about to see is a bunch of crap why would they show a film that's a bunch of crap and all it's. it was just it was weird let me introduce the director again frederick
thank . everybody. sort of for all this waiting it's been a very very special. time this. i have never experienced anything like this before in my life i believe in democracy and i believe in free word and i believe that there was a balancing of side to between different voices and i think those are all to be room for independent films and i'm really happy to talk to all of you off to the film about the complexity of life and filmmaking and truth i mean all truth in the court but maybe also in filmmaking. lean back have a nice time thank you. thank you.
what was kind of sad with the whole disclaimer thing it was really said it was exactly what del wanted to do don't want to have a divide division between film independent and use a filmmaker you know if felt like those screenings at the festival coupled with the disclaimer and the panel discussion afterwards of colleagues and a lawyer it felt like they were punishing you and what i saw those really like a power like it was almost like a shift like an effect for show just to make sure that they distance themselves anough from you so that we don't couldn't come out and that just felt really really strange at that that they would do that because allison you became the pariah in the room not dull. the festival was nearly over and still no loss but all this pressure just been
scattered. as i was preparing to leave los angeles i heard that dole had served a court order on distressed demanding all e-mails contracts recordings film footage relating to my movie. it seems like this is not over yet. i came back to sweden early july i was totally exhausted after the turmoil in l.a. . so i was actually sitting at home one night on the internet looking for a whole day trips with my kids and i received a call from los angeles it's a journalist who wants to comment on a lawsuit being brought against me from dold dole foods is suing us. film maker for wanting to show
a fraudulent documentary slamming the company. based filmmaker frederick is being sued by a dollar the company claims the film is a fraud. we are suing. because we. produced a movie which is there clearly you know this much of the against the company and against our employees. it's three different lawsuits they're seeing me frederick and. the way they doing this what exactly is their strategy. really the. their main object if. we've become a part of our own film. trays a trial and now the same forces are directed against us. have you considered accommodating them in any way with the film there is nothing to accommodate their demands include stopping the film shutting down the websites i won't discuss this
issue in public in the future. shoulders we worked around the clock twenty four seventh's and we have no time to engage in new film projects. luckily we have a us insurance policy covering us against lawsuits and now we have the best lawyer working for us your film is wrapped up into a much bigger call for their cause is to get rid of billions. using chemicals so this is a cheap investment for that they are. very expensive. they're going to do but it's an investment in a bigger picture. yeah it's it's just distressing i mean it's distressing and yeah i mean it is. this is kind of the notional rollercoaster because i mean lots
of time off it quite good but it's. this of course extremely tiring yeah this is my little bit that's the point and that's that's what they want to get trying to zap your confidence they're trying to make you cautious in what you say they're trying to essentially you and others to say you know what it's not worth it to go after these corporations fight these sort of hot potato issues on the. hot seat stuff so i don't feel that in. the book. i worked as a foreign correspondent earlier on like in korea or chile or south africa and i always teamed up with american journalists and i have had respect of them but i kept wondering why did they keep telling the story from dole's perspective why
didn't they dig deeper. the thing that was most surprising about the media coverage of the suit that came out against you was how easily you were a fraud and dole was wrong and the banana company was fighting for justice and. no reporters should ever take that at face value we have a astounding lack of curiosity on the part of the journalism community in the us. a lack of skepticism these journalists failed in their job they took a press release and reprinted it basically they didn't do any due diligence and that is even more shameful than the film festival disavowing you we have a media that is corrupted by power mostly by corporate power you have corporate ownership from the top you have corporate advertising coming in from the side we have a media that is where advertising and money and corporate influence is really the
mother's milk. the reality is that the media is much more willing to take down stories when a company comes to them and say listen. don't write that story now because you're going to look stupid and we will go on with a massive denial and we'll go all to your media organization as well i know all the global corporations in the us who have threatened to pull advertising from the wall street journal the new york times because they don't like the editorial coverage so there isn't as much investment in investigative journalism as there was in the past journalism itself is under threat. spending a lot of money to story they have an american p.r. company contacting journalists around the world to broker is one of the prominent
public relations firms in washington they're located in the heart of downtown just about a block from the white house it's really hard to know what your parole tour is up to or who they even work for because they're not obligated to disclose any of that information. proctor used to work for the coalition provisional authority in iraq which the united states government set up shortly after the invasion that overthrew saddam hussein so he would have been involved in frequent strategy meetings about how to sell the iraq war and part of selling that war would have also been to attack the critics and to make the critics look bad and if you look at the roster of any of the top wapping in public relation firms in town they're filled with former members of congress for murder ministration officials former cia officials increasingly journalists are going the same route.
and. we now occupy an era of extreme reputation anxiety among leading companies around the world because they're very aware that corporate reputation which they may have built over fifty years or so can be shredded in a matter of minutes so when a company feels that it's on the potential attack you try and divert attention from the real story or you have a snow dump all good alternative information so they will go out there and say listen we've got this story about reputations being on the files by this disreputable swedish filmmaker acting for a lawyer who we think is fraudulent. we you can have this exclusively we'll give
you all the background information and you plonk the story so if it's frederick's a bad guy if i can get that narrative into the newspapers first to make it sticky and appeal to people in a way that they'll want to tell their friends then that's the story that will go out. there was a swedish documentary maker who went to nicaragua he did a documentary on how pesticides of damage the health of workers there the problem was that was not the case these workers were recruited by a lawyer down there who wanted to make a case he wanted to to he had a beef against dole basically and so he recruited a bunch of nicaraguan but at a harvester's to lie and say that their health was damaged in the swedish filmmaker made the documentary. he didn't find out it was a fraud until the film was done this guy still wants to show the film because he went through the process of making that i cried.
the banks really on the united states the federal reserve which has a misnomer because nothing to do with federal. banks owned by. individuals who loaned money to the united states. his love. of that had been my dream. but he couldn't hold on to the research the thing is. now she runs her own factory. challenge to men there's no alcohol or smoking and even coffee is forbidden they worship the earth. will he be able to win. men versus women.
sixteen percent imports came from illegal fishing. the european union is ironically taking fish from some of the poorest nations on earth so this is a very serious and very urgent problem. that needs immediate international action. they enter our territorial waters they fish they load the fish on to the ships and leave for europe. to day illegal fishing is taking the bread out of our mouths. torch is on its epic journey to such a. one hundred twenty three days. through two thousand nine hundred two cities of russia. relayed by fourteen thousand people or sixty five thousand kilometers.
in a record setting trip by land air sea and others face. a limp torch relay. m r t r two dot com. looked right on the scene. of the first street. and i think pictures. on our reporters twitter. and instagram. to be in the know. on law. recently a un report and investigation by human rights groups make it abundantly clear obama's policies may constitute war crimes under international law the white house dismisses these claims it would appear washington reserves the exceptional right to
murder with impunity. global radicals set a grisly record as the world body column doubles in just a year it's raising serious question. just what a war on terror. israel's war planes bomb syria again reports which the israeli military refused to comment on. but everybody knows they did it and all of this in the midst of syria's ongoing civil war with the government trying to keep the national agreements the first phase of chemical disarmament. desperate italians demanding. poor clashing with police in the streets of rome at least six people. also here on.