tv Government Access Programming SFGTV November 13, 2019 12:00pm-1:01pm PST
develop the site as critical resource for the city's homeless population. today we are here to request approval of the last remaining financing and ground lease to move toward construction starts in january 2020. so before you today are four resolutions and one ordinance associated with this development. i will present a project overview and the resolutions. one for supportive housing ground lease and loan agreement, issuance of multi-family revenue grounds and third grant agreement to fund the homeless services center and staff from the office of public finance will present the resolution and ordinance with the $5 million in certificates of participation of financing to build the homeless services center. 1064 mission is an extraordinary
opportunity to build permanent housing in the south of market. this site was listed as surplus property under the federal property assistance program in january 2017. title 5 of the federal act identifies homeless as the top priority. they applied to develop 250 units of the housing was conditionally awarded the site valued at $36 million for $1. the federal program has a hard completion requirement. the project must be operational by november 2021. they issued the r.f.q. and developed episcopal community services. modular construction is for the residential portion of the project to meet the aggressive schedule and reduce costs. here is a site map of the project centrally located on a major transit corridor on
seventh street. a large parking lot adjacent to the federal court of appeals. the project is five floors over a concrete podium surrounding two courtyards with a public open space accessible omission street. there will be 153 units for adults 103 seniors, two resident managers. they will support the services long-term. they propose to house the culinary job program for those experiencing homelessness, chefs on the ground floor. it will be focused on wellness and build on the long experience with helping residents age in place. all units will be subsidized by the operating subsidy program. so the homeless services center came about because as they were
selecting the developer it became clear it could house other critical services to fit the intent of the site. they have been searching for new locations for the critical services due to seismic conditions of the building. this is a unique opportunity for a co-location for a new homeless services center. mercy housing is the turnkey developer to be financed separately. homeless services will be owned by the city. the relocated programs of dp h & h sh proposed to be there are the urgent care clinic. street medicine, de dental servs and there will be an entrance separate from the residential building. first resolution before you
requests approval of $74.4 million loan for minimum term of 57 years to finance construction of the project as well as approval of long-term ground lease between the city and limited partnership with annual base rent of $1 per year. the total cost is $143.6 million. the residential capital sources include the funding, low income taxing tax credits and federal home loan bank a regard. it is $74.4 million of which $27.7 million from the first allocation of no place like home funding targets to create the permanent housing for chronic homeless with serious mental illness.
second is revenue bonds not to exceed $87 million to provide construction financing for the residential project. the hearing was held in june of this year. the bond allocation was approved october 16th and to note this financing is conduit and does not require the city to pledge repayment of the bonds. third resolution requests approval of amended restated grant to provide $13.4 million to finance construction of the city owned and operated homeless services center to the mercy affiliate developing that project. of the financing structure to maximize non-city resources to support the homeless center. it covers a portion of the funds needed to build and leveraging tax credit for its portion of the shell costs. to review the timeline. today we are before you to
request approvals. the construction contract will be final later this month. we requested h.h.s. transfer in december and we would close construction and bond financing and start construction in january 2020. once the board approves the project financing today it will be fully funded and should be able to proceed. now, i would like to invite michelle from the office of public finance to describe the cop funding resolution and ordinance for the homeless services center. thank you. >> good morning. office of public finance. as she mentioned in addition to the resolutions related to the ground lease and the 1064-68 mission street affordable housing project. before usa resolution and --
before you the resolution and the certificates. they will finance $5 million of the total project construction for the city owned and operated homeless services center, as ms. $8.5 million comes from general obligation bonds from public health and safety bonds and general fund sources dedicated to finance the project previously approved by the committee and board of supervisors. the certificates and paper notes are to be executed and delivered in an amount not to exceed $7.25 million as well as $64,000 for the service reserve and
$900,000 in commercial paper and interest and fees 450,000 for other costs with certificates for authorization. the appropriate amount includes $245,000 contingency amount which allows flexibility for fluctuating market conditions before the final sale of certificates. the plan anticipates using the paper program established in 2010 to finance initial project costs. controller's office uses the commercial paper as interim tool to be paid by long-term debt such assertive cats of participation. to issue commercial paper the board of supervisors must authorize the long-term repayment which would be the certificates. based on estimate of 6.5% for all in interest cost on
$7 million in certificates, the office of public finance estimates possibly incur up to about the 12.945 or $13 million in debt service over 20 year term annually $635,000. the incremental debt services are assumed in the adopted 10 year capital plan. this is part of an overall $108 million allocated in the plan for 101 grove project. this complies with the capital plan policy of limiting the funds at at discretionary revenues. i will remind committee office of public finance will return prior to the sale of the certificates of participation to seek approval of the documents
and the final forms to include lease agreements, notice of sale, continuing disclosure certificate, preliminary official stated to disclose to investors. at that time we present on current market rate conditions the anticipated structure of certificates and discuss the city-owned assets. i am available to answer questions related to financing. we have representatives from the mayor's office and development team to answer project-related questions. >> does that conclude your presentation? could we hear from the bla report on item 10, 11, 12 and 13. >> items 10 and 11 are approving
the certificates of participation and appropriationing for the homeless service center at 1064-68 mission street $7.2 million for the appropriation. the issuance and appropriation. item 13 is a grant agreement to the developer of the homeless service center. if you look at page 28 of our report, this is the actual choices and uses of the certificate of participation of the $7.2 million, $5 million would be for project cost did balance is reserves and other financings costs. table one on page 25 of the report this is the total budget for the development of the homeless service center $16.1 million. city sources of that are $15 million. if you look at the sources it includes some bond money
$5 million and $5 million in the proceeds from the certificate of participation for the project. then some other general fund moneys added to this. the total grant amount to the nonprofit is $13.4 million. we again have the entire project cost and funding sources here. we recommend approval of those three-pieces of legislation. item 14 is a loan agreement between the mayor's office of housing and 10464 mission for $74 million to provide vinancin towards the support of housing component of the project at 1064-1068 mission. again, we have a project budget on table 1, page 32, of the report showing the entire project cost of $143 million, which includes alone from the
mayor's office of $74 million and $69 million in other non-city sources. the issuance of the certificate of participation are within city policy and we recommend approval. >> thank you very much. we open it up for public comment. any members of the public want to comment on items 10 through 14? >> i was curious what each unit is selling for the you include the value of the lamped which each unit would be selling for, also i think typically in san francisco buildings of 20 units are greater for $300,000 per unit. the greater the scale of the project, the lower the price of units typically. >> thank you very much.
>> doug schumacher i will answer that question. they are not for sale, they are for rent. priced at 30% of the resident's income which ti typically is between zero and $300. i came up to make a different comment. i want to thank the board and department for the work on this and our partner. two things to draw your attention that are important as you start to see more much these projects. one is this is one of the first modular projects in san francisco. it is an emerging technology. it is an industry going through its growing pains. it is going to be increasingly important to develop affordable housing in san francisco. the second piece i want to draw your attention to sb35. this is an exemption for the site. it is important to have this tool in front of us. there is a lot of debate about
the potential exemptions. a project of this size with affordable housing and clinics. i think it would have been more consult with out that exception. thank you. >> any other speakers? seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues, any comments or questions? so i want to thank actually the department for coming forward beforehand to give us a briefing or give me and be my staff a briefing on the whole thing. i think that when we deal with numbers of $74 million, it is very daunting. i want to thank you for spending the time to go through every item one by one and actually what the fiscal consequences or costs are.
thank you very much. no comments or questions from my colleagues. bla recommends approval. i would like to move this to the board with a positive recommendation. we can take that without objection. thank you very much. madam clerk, please read items 15 and 16 together. >> item 15 ordinance appropriating $83,600,000 of certificates of participation to the mayor's office for housing and community development to fund project costs of hope sf. item 16 authorizing certificates of participation in one or more series on a tax-exempt and/or tax annual basis at $83,600,000
to finance and refinance certain capital improvement projects. >> good afternoon. i am the director of public housing initiatives. i am pleased to present for your approval these two ordinances authorizing the city to issue certificates of participation to generate $53.6 million in new funding for three of the four hope sf projects. hope sf is the nation's first large scale community development initiative aimed at creating vibrant mixed income neighborhoods without mass displacement of original low income communities of color. this bond authority will support projects breaking ground later this year and in 2020 including infrastructure, replacement of public housing units and net new affordable housing units at all
three sites. we are excited all three sites will be actively under construct. sunnydale block six breaks ground in december. that item was at the committee a few weeks ago. potrero and hunters view in the fall of 2020 and the vertical or housing portions will follow with construction start of six to nine months later. the hope sf initiative addresses decades of disinvestment from the communities in southeast sector of our city and as a result our hope sf projects offer additional amenities and features that go on and beyond the typical affordable housing projects and sometimes result in higher per unit costs as well. most notably on the projects we are talking about today, we are
seeing a lot of funds spent on infrastructure. at su sunnydale the city is contributing $28 million for infrastructure. at hunter's view about $30 million. at potrero $32 million. the way we try to support the projects despite these big expenditures is we assign a portion to the housing projects to allow us to leverage outside sources remains very expensive. other upgrades that we provide include parking and also larger units. we provide more bedrooms at these projects to ensure all of our public housing tenants are rehoused. the bonds before you are sized based on the economic activity that will be generated by market rate projects at all three hope sf sites.
these are all in predevelopment which is exciting. we expect to break ground on hunters view market rate project first one in the second quarter of 2020. that is an exciting milestone for us. please let me know if you have questions about the hope sf presentation, and my colleague from office of public finance will talk to you about the specifics of the bond financing. >> thank you very much. >> hello. office of public finance. two ordinances before you appropriate proceeds and authorize execution and delivery of $83.6 million to finance and refinance capital improvement including hunters view and sunny view as part of hope sf.
delivering 560 units when completed. they would finance $57 million of projects managed by the mayor's office of housing within from structure. they anticipate that the debt service from the sale is consistent with the capital plan policy general fund debt service at or below 3.25 of general fund discretionary revenue. this would pay the cost of the project of $57 million, approximately $6.7 million for debt service reserve, 16.2 in commercial paper and fees. approximately $1.2 million for dell irrecosts associated with the certificates, also $2.4 million to allow for
fluctuations. the current plan anticipates the city's paper program and then to be taken out by the certificates when approved enough project costs. office of public finance monitors and we don't fully expect to issue up to the not to exceed amount given the interest rates lower. given fluctuations in the project schedules, higher interest rates when we sell the bonds it built in a conservative contingency to sell the bonds to fund the project. based on interest cost of 6.6% on $86 million the controller estimates over 25 year term of the bonds or $6.7 million per year in debt service. as general fund supported debt
cops will be paid by the general fund and the city will structure cops as the tax structure between the city and third-party trustee. we anticipate the city on the hospital campus would serve as collateral for the cop. the hospital campus currently secures city's existing cop debt from 2012 as well as what we will close in the next couple of weeks. with the approval they would approve the financing documents including the property leases, trust agreement, notice of sale, continuing disclosure and other documents which is for perspective investors. i am here to answer questions about the financing. >> could we hear from the bla,
please. >> item 14 approves the issuance of $83.6 million in certificates of participation. for the three hope sf projects. i want to issue what she said which is approving the trust documents and the project leases and other documents that go with the certificates of par pistis participation. appropriate $83.6 million to the three projects. on page 40 of our report, the actual amount of the certificates is about $81 million. they may not issue the full amount.
the extra money is for the project cost of $56.9 million. balance is for reserves and financing required. on table two it summarizes the uses of these projects. some goes for infrastructure cost and some for the financing for the housing development. this is within the debt service policy consistent with other approvals for hope sf and we recommend approval. >> any members of the public like to comment on items 16 and 17 -- 15 and 16? >> i was curious about the comparable cost per square foot of similar buildings, nonluxury housing what it goes for to construct? >> public comment is closed. any comments or questions, colleagues? i have been briefed on this so i
feel comfortable with the big dollar amounts. >> i would like to move this to the board. madam clerk please read item number 17. >> resolution authorizing the mayor's office to execute an amendment to the loan documents related to the existing loan agreement with the san francisco housing accelerator fund for an amount not to exceed $10,000 for a total loan amount of $20 million. >> i am caroline mccormick, project manager assigned to the program. today i am requesting that you approve a resolution authorizing ocd to execute an amendment to an existing loan documents with the san francisco housing accelerator fund to increase the
loan amount by $10 million for a total not to exceed $20 million and extending the term to 20 years. the housing accelerator fund is a financial institution that acts as the key par partner on the city program where they provide upfront construction financing on the commitment that they will come in 12 to 24 months later for the permanent financing through city subsidy and preservation and first mortgage product. to date bridge loans led to preservation of 14 buildings totaling 277 residential units, 19 commercial spaces, 15 dwelling units and accelerated acquisition of one vacant land site to be developed as 135 residential units. this additional $10 million will
increase the lending capacity and facility in raising and dollars to execute on more dollars on more projects. this is a zero interest loan repayable after 20 years. source for funds is fiscal year 1920 allocation from the city affordable housing production and preservation fund which is funded by excess revenue funds. as the report sited the city's total investment will revolve and continue to fund affordable housing projects pass the city coming in as a lender. i recommend your approval of this resolution so they can continue to work in partnership to further the anti displacement programs and preserve affordable
housing for low to moderate incomes by the city. justin is here as well. >> the report please. >> the proposed legislation would increase the funds the moneys loaned by the mayor's office from $10 million to $20 million and extends repayment term through 2039. this is alone that is repaid at the end of 20 years at zero percent interest. there is no money coming back to the city for it. >> look at tables one and the projects funded and outstanding loans. it shows upcoming projects. we recommend approval. >> any comments from my
colleagues? >> supervisor mandelman. >> i think this is a super innovative program and would like to be added as cosponsor. would like to see more district 8 projects showing up. >> public comment is closed. i would like to be added as a sponsor. i make a motion to move to the full board with positive recommendation. no objection. can you please call item 18. >> resolution authorizing the mayors' office to participate in the second round notice of availability and accept and expands the county competitive allocation award up to $36.5 million under the california department of housing community development no place
like home program. >> good afternoon. i am amy from the office of community development. this is to authorize our office to expend up to $36.5 million in no place like homes funds under the alternative county designation. they provide funding for persons with serious mental illness who are homeless, the counties awarded proportionally. san the community development department is releasing notice of funding applications about once each year. the board has already approved and accepted the first round of funding for $27 million in come pecompetitive funds.
we will use this for the development of 1064 mission project which you just heard earlier from my colleagues. this current resolution approves the second round and third round of funding for up to $36.5 million. we have identified three potential projects that would be eligible to the use of the funds. 180 jones for 36 of the total housing units 36 supportive units for adults. parcel u32 housing units for transitional use and 95 supportive units for adults as well. we identified the potential projects we have two years to allocate the funding commitments. this allows our office to project what are the use of the funds based on the availability
and competitiveness of the projects for other funding as well. our office will make a determination as to which of these three projects will be allocated the funding depending on the factors i discussed. we ask the committee to recommend the resolution and move forward to the full board. i am joined by my colleague in case there are questions about the program. >> thank you very much. there is no bla report on this. any comments or questions? seeing none this opens it for public comment. any members of the comment to comment on 18. public comment is closed. i would like to move to the board with positive recommendation. we will take that without objection. can you please call item 19. >> resolution approving the fiscal year 2019 housing opportunities for persons with aids, permanent supportive
housing renewal garage and authorizing the mayor on behalf of the city and county san francisco from the housing and urban department from january 1, 2020 through december 31, 2022 in the amount of $1,430,000. >> would you like to speak on this? it is important and i think gloria is here to talk to us about it. >> thank you very much. >> thank you. i am gloria wu. this is a resolution to allow our office on behalf of the city to accept and expands a federal grant from the federal department of housing and urban department. it is the renewal grant housing opportunities for persons with aids. for san francisco thi this is a three year grant for $1.43 million starting
january 1, 2020. these funds will be used for a partial rent subsidy program for persons with h.i.v. to help them maintain housing while receiving vocational counseling, attending classes or looking for work. >> thank you very much. there is no bla report. open for public comment. public comment is now closed. comments, questions from colleagues. i would like to move with positive recommendation. we can take without objection. thank you very much. any other business before us today? >> no further business. >> we are adjourned.
value all these properties? well, to better understand our work, we need to explain the state's proposition 13 law. in 1978, california voters passed proposition 13. under prop 13, we value your property at market value when you first buy it. every year after, that value goes up by the c.p.i. or the california consumer price index. but if the c.p.i. is more than 2%, prop 13 caps the increase at 2%. we'll walk-through the maximum increases prop 13 would allow. let's take a home with initial value of $400,000. in the second year your assessed value grows by a maximum of 2%, growing from $400,000 to $408,000. in year three, that $408,000 is increased by 2% to roughly $416,000. every year, the value grows by
the maximum rate of 2%, and that is called your prop 13 value. keep in mind as time goes by your prop 13 value may not be the same as market rate. what do we mean by that? let's say over the last ten years, home prices in san francisco have gone every roughly 10% every year. despite that, your prop 13 value is capped at 2% growth creating a difference between your market value and prop 13 value. know that the value recessed when there's a change in ownership. a change in ownership means that the property has a new zoner. maybe through a -- new owner. maybe through a sale, a gift or adding or dropping names through title. at that time the home will be assessed a new market rate. that value becomes a new starting point for the property. just like before, the growth continues to be limited at 2% until the next transfer happens. remember, the new owners are responsible for paying taxes at
the new level from the first day that they own it. value might also be added when construction happens on your property. that would be another instance when growth in your value might exceed 2%. here, we would add the value of construction on top of your existing prop 13 value. every july, we'll let you know what your assessed value is by sending you a letter called a notice of assessed value. you can use that information to estimate your property taxes early. please note that a separate office called the treasurer tax collector's office will send you a letter in october and they're responsible 230r collections. for more information, visit our website, >> shop and dine in the 49 promotes local businesses, and challenges residents to do their shopping within the 49 square miles of san francisco. by supporting local services in our neighborhood, we help san
[♪] >> manufacturing in cities creates this perfect platform for people to earn livelihoods and for people to create more economic prosperity. i'm kate sosa. i'm cofounder and ceo of sf made. sf made is a public private partnership in the city of san francisco to help manufacturers start, grow, and stay right here in san francisco. sf made really provides wraparound resources for manufacturers that sets us apart from other small business support organizations who
provide more generalized support. everything we do has really been developed over time by listening and thinking about what manufacturer needs grow. for example, it would be traditional things like helping them find capital, provide assistance loans, help to provide small business owners with education. we have had some great experience doing what you might call pop ups or temporary selling events, and maybe the most recent example was one that we did as part of sf made week in partnership with the city seas partnership with small business, creating a 100 company selling day right here at city hall, in partnership with mayor lee and the board of supervisors, and it was just a wonderful opportunity for many of our smaller manufacturers who may be one or two-person
shop, and who don't have the wherewithal to have their own dedicated retail store to show their products and it comes back to how do we help companies set more money into arthur businesses and develop more customers and their relationships, so that they can continue to grow and continue to stay here in san francisco. i'm amy kascel, and i'm the owner of amy kaschel san francisco. we started our line with wedding gowns, and about a year ago, we launched a ready to wear collection. san francisco's a great place to do business in terms of clientele. we have wonderful brides from all walks of life and doing really interesting things: architects, doctors, lawyers, teachers, artists, other like minded
entrepreneurs, so really fantastic women to work with. i think it's important for them to know where their clothes are made and how they're made. >> my name is jefferson mccarly, and i'm the general manager of the mission bicycle company. we sell bikes made here for people that ride here. essentially, we sell city bikes made for riding in urban environments. our core business really is to build bikes specifically for each individual. we care a lot about craftsmanship, we care a lot about quality, we care about good design, and people like that. when people come in, we spend a lot of time going to the design wall, and we can talk about handle bars, we can see the riding position, and we take notes all over the wall. it's a pretty fun shopping
experience. paragraph. >> for me as a designer, i love the control. i can see what's going on, talk to my cutter, my pattern maker, looking at the designs. going through the suing room, i'm looking at it, everyone on the team is kind of getting involved, is this what that drape look? is this what she's expecting, maybe if we've made a customization to a dress, which we can do because we're making everything here locally. over the last few years, we've been more technical. it's a great place to be, but you know, you have to concentrate and focus on where things are going and what the right decisions are as a small business owner. >> sometimes it's appropriate
to bring in an expert to offer suggestions and guidance in coaching and counseling, and other times, we just need to talk to each other. we need to talk to other manufacturers that are facing similar problems, other people that are in the trenches, just like us, so that i can share with them a solution that we came up with to manage our inventory, and they can share with me an idea that they had about how to overcome another problem. >> moving forward, where we see ourselves down the road, maybe five and ten years, is really looking at a business from a little bit more of a ready to wear perspective and making things that are really thoughtful and mindful, mindful of the end user, how they're going to use it, whether it's the end piece or a he hwedding gown, are they going to use it again, and incorporating that into the end collection, and so that's the direction i hear at
this point. >> the reason we are so enamored with the work we do is we really do see it as a platform for changing and making the city something that it has always been and making sure that we're sharing the opportunities that we've been blessed with economically and socially as possible, socially as possible, broadening that - working for the city and county of san francisco will immerse you in a vibrant and dynamic city that's on the forefront of economic growth, the arts, and social change. our city has always been on the edge of progress and innovation.
after all, we're at the meeting of land and sea. - our city is famous for its iconic scenery, historic designs, and world-class style. it's the birthplace of blue jeans, and where "the rock" holds court over the largest natural harbor on the west coast. - our 28,000 city and county employees play an important role in making san francisco what it is today. - we provide residents and visitors with a wide array of services, such as improving city streets and parks, keeping communities safe, and driving buses and cable cars. - our employees enjoy competitive salaries, as well as generous benefits programs. but most importantly, working for the city and county of san francisco gives employees an opportunity to contribute their ideas, energy, and commitment to shape the city's future. - thank you for considering a career with the city and county of san francisco.
>> the goal is simple. it's to raise women's voices. >> learn a little bit about what you should be thinking about in the future. >> we had own over 300 -- over 300 people who signed up for the one-on-one counseling today. >> i think in the world of leading, people sometimes discount the ability to lead quietly and effectively. the assessor's office is a big
one. there are 58 counties in the state of california and every single county has one elected assessor in the county. our job is to look at property taxes and make sure that we are fairly taxing every single property in san francisco. one of the big things that we do is as a result of our work, we bring in a lot of revenue, about 2.6 billion worth of revenue to the city. often, people will say, what do you do with that money, and i like to share what we do with property taxes. for every dollar we collect in property taxes, about 68 cents of it goes to support public sstss, our police officers, our fire departments, our streets, our cleaning that happens in the city. but i think what most people don't know is 34 cents of the dollar goes to public education. so it goes to the state of california and in turn gets allocated back to our local school districts. so this is an incredibly
important part of what we do in this office. it's an interesting place to be, i have to say. my colleagues across the state have been wonderful and have been very welcoming and share their knowledge with me. in my day-to-day life, i don't think about that role, being the only asian american assessor in the state, i just focus on being the best i can be, representing my city very well, representing the county of san francisco well. by being the only asian american assessor, i think you have a job to try to lift up and bring as many people on board, as well. i hope by doing the best that you can as an individual, people will start to see that your assessor is your elected leaders, the people that are making important decisions can look like you, can be like you, can be from your background.
i grew up with a family where most of my relatives, my aunties, my uncles, my parents, were immigrants to the united states. when my parents first came here, they came without any relatives or friends in the united states. they had very little money, and they didn't know how to speak english very well. they came to a place that was completely foreign, a place where they had absolutely nobody here to help them, and i can't imagine what that must have been like, how brave it was for them to take that step because they were doing this in order to create an opportunity for their family. so my parents had odd jobs, my dad worked in the kitchens, my mom worked as a seamstress sewing. as we grew up, we eventually had a small business. i very much grew up in a family of immigrants, where we helped to translate. we went to the restaurant every weekend helping out, rolling egg rolls, eating egg rolls, and doing whatever we need to do to help the family out.
it really was an experience growing up that helped me be the person that i am and viewing public service the way that i do. one of the events that really stuck with me when i was growing up was actually the rodney king riots. we lived in southern california at the time, and my parents had a restaurant in inglewood, california. i can remember smelling smoke, seeing ashes where we lived. it was incredibly scary because we didn't know if we were going to lose that restaurant, if it was going to be burned down, if it was going to be damaged, and it was our entire livelihood. and i remember there were a lot of conversations at that time around what it was that government to do to create more opportunities or help people be more successful, and that stuck with me. it stuck with me because i remain believe government has a role, government has a responsibility to change the outcomes for communities, to create opportunities, to help people go to school, to help
people open businesses and be successful. >> make sure to be safe, and of course to have fun. >> and then, i think as you continue to serve in government, you realize that those convictions and the persons that you are really help to inform you, and so long as you go back to your core, and you remember why you're doing what you're doing, you know, i think you can't go wrong. it's funny, because, you know, i never had thought i would do this. i became a supervisor first for the city under very unusual circumstances, and i can remember one day, i'm shopping with friends and really not having a care in the world about politics or running for office or being in a public position, and the next day, i'm sworn in and serving on the board of supervisors. for many of us who are going through our public service, it's very interesting, i think, what people view as a leader. sometimes people say, well, maybe the person who is most
outspoken, the person who yells the loudest or who speaks the loudest is going to be the best leader. and i think how i was raised, i like to listen first, and i like to try to figure outweighs to work with -- out ways to work with people to get things done. i hope that time goes on, you can see that you can have all sorts of different leaders whether at the top of city government or leading organizations or leading teams, that there are really different kinds of leadership styles that we should really foster because it makes us stronger as organizations. >> take advantage of all the wonderful information that you have here, at the vendor booth, at our seminars and also the one-on-one counseling. >> i wouldn't be where i was if i didn't have very strong people who believed in me. and even at times when i didn't believe in my own abilities or my own skills, i had a lot of people who trusted and believed i either had the passion or skills to accomplish and do what i did. if there was one thing that i can tell young women, girls,
who are thinking about and dreaming about the things they want to be, whether it's being a doctor or being in politics, running an organization, being in business, whatever it is, i think it's really to just trust yourself and believe that who you are is enough, that you are enough to make it work and to make things successful. [♪] >> i just wanted to say a few words. one is to the parents and to all of the kids. thank you for supporting this program and for trusting us to create a soccer program in the bayview. >> soccer is the world's game, and everybody plays, but in the united states, this is a sport that struggles with access for certain communities. >> i coached basketball in a coached football for years, it is the same thing. it is about motivating kids and keeping them together, and giving them new opportunities.
>> when the kids came out, they had no idea really what the game was. only one or two of them had played soccer before. we gave the kids very simple lessons every day and made sure that they had fun while they were doing it, and you really could see them evolve into a team over the course of the season. >> i think this is a great opportunity to be part of the community and be part of programs like this. >> i get to run around with my other teammates and pass the ball. >> this is new to me. i've always played basketball or football. i am adjusting to be a soccer mom. >> the bayview is like my favorite team. even though we lose it is still fine. >> right on. >> i have lots of favorite memories, but i think one of them is just watching the kids enjoy themselves. >> my favorite memory was just having fun and playing. >> bayview united will be in soccer camp all summer long. they are going to be at civic
centre for two different weeklong sessions with america scores, then they will will have their own soccer camp later in the summer right here, and then they will be back on the pitch next fall. >> now we know a little bit more about soccer, we are learning more, and the kids are really enjoying the program. >> we want to be united in the bayview. that is why this was appropriate >> this guy is the limit. the kids are already athletic, you know, they just need to learn the game. we have some potential college-bound kids, definitely. >> today was the last practice of the season, and the sweetest moment was coming out here while , you know, we were setting up the barbecue and folding their uniforms, and looking out onto the field, and seven or eight of the kids were playing. >> this year we have first and second grade. we are going to expand to third, forth, and fifth grade next year bring them out and if you have middle school kids, we are starting a team for middle school. >> you know why? >> why? because we are?
>> bayview united. >> that's right. >> good evening. well congresswoman to the october 23, 2019 board of appeals meeting. rick swig is joined by ann lazarus and commissioner tanner. we expect commissioner darryl honda shortry and commissioner eudardo santacana will be abtent tonight. to my left is the legal attorney. at the control is the board's legal assistant katie sullivan and the league process clerk. i am julie rosenberg,