the clinton administration didn't behave this way. the carter administration didn't behave this way. this is a new breed of democrats. you talk to democrats. you talk to even liberals, and they can't fathom what's happening. it's like a very small cawed ray of ideological crusaders have taken over ideological policy. whether it's in iran ferguson. irs. it's a fringe administration. enacting fringe policies. one of the reasons they get away with it, not enough people pay attention to the news. (?) until something penetrates like it did with jimmy kimmel and the president, you don't have a republican party with the skill set to respond to this sort of behavior. >> christian adams. thank you for being with us. president obama not the only one trying to play both sides of the issue. democrats have been piling on republicans all week over their open letter to the iranian leadership in which they warned the iranians that a nuclear deal with president obama won't have a lasting effect. it will be simply an agreement between two heads of stat

administration diplomat, ginsberg. he recently wrote, israelis have grown weary of netanyahu and his obsessive sky is falling declarations. a bipartisan investigation has begun of one voice and use of $350,000 in a state department grant to openly campaign against netanyahu, an activity that may have violated its tax exempt status. subsidiary is a campaign that is headed by swrarmy bird, key campaign strategist in 2012 bird flew to israel after criticizing netanyahu's plan to speak to congress. >> no doubt in my mind when the president refuses to meet with the prime minister but mool meanwhile his minions are racing thousands of miles overseas to influence the election that's what the obama administration does here in the united states microtarget groups and influence turnout. >> a large majority of israelis believe that the obama administration has been interfering in the election, which is set for tuesday. harris? >> those are strong charges. tell me mo r about this. this is not the first time that this group or its

during the clinton administration we had what was known as a dot com boom. but what can we do now besides these electric cars that really they thought was the best thing since the wheel, what can we do now in order to stimulate the economy? do think we need to do some deregulation like we did back during the clinton administration? guest: that is a great question. we did have a dot com boom during the forefront of this technology go revolution -- technological revolution. what is the hottest product in america? is the ipods and cell phones. we have done research at ppi that shows that most of the investment is going into the digital sector. to the internet, the basic infrastructure, all the devices and social media search engines, all of this is an incredible source of dynamism and growth in america. and we have to nurture that that economy. we're also seeing the same thing happen in the energy sector. the shale, oil, and gas boom has been a tremendous windfall for the united dates. again, lots of investment in the energy sector. a lot of good job creation.

is reminiscent of the welfare reform programs the clinton administration did years ago. what i wouldn't want to say is if you don't do these things you are not going to get your food stamps and you are not going to eat and tough luck charlie. people do have an incentive to get off of food stamps. it is called making more money and not having to rely on food stamps for your food. >> we hear all the time stories of the welfare system being cheated in those regards because they know if they make above a certain threshold they won't be receiving as much and they can stay on it and make more and they would have to spend more money if they make the new threshold. i think it is a dangerous game to play and we want to make people more self-sufficient and not reliant upon the government. neil: let's look at that figure. government 15 million some type of food support goes over $70 million, i don't know what the accurate figures but bottom line it seems like a lot of people need some type of food assistance, this recovery itself could be called into question. we are closer to moza

. >>> and robert reich served in the clinton administration and two other administrations as well. we talked about an economy gap in this country. >> you have increasingly have workers in other countries that demand far lower wages and second is technology itself in terms of displacing more and more workers from good jobs. and then you have also a failure of politics. a failure of government to come up with ways to boost and maintain good jobs basically for the last 30 years and i can say this because i was secretary of labor, and i failed to do what i think should have been done or could have been done. we've seen government in this country especially of failing to protect jobs and wages. >> and the face of late night comedy. well, it's changing. we now know who is taking over the daily show when jon stewart steps in. we look at how a south african comedian's view of the world will change the tone and the viewership of the show. >> i look forward to it. >>> interest is an update on a landmark journey around the world. the solar-paneled aircraft had landed in china after a 20-hour

the clinton administration didn't behave this way. the carter administration didn't behave this way. this is a new breed of democrats. you talk to democrats. you talk to even liberals, and they can't fathom what's happening. it's like a very small cawed ray of ideological crusaders have taken over ideological policy. whether it's in iran ferguson. irs. it's a fringe administration. enacting fringe policies. one of the reasons they get away with it, not enough people pay attention to the news. (?) until something penetrates like it did with jimmy kimmel and the president, you don't have a republican party with the skill set to respond to this sort of behavior. >> christian adams. thank you for being with us. president obama not the only one trying to play both sides of the issue. democrats have been piling on republicans all week over their open letter to the iranian leadership in which they warned the iranians that a nuclear deal with president obama won't have a lasting effect. it will be simply an agreement between two heads of stat

we talked during the clinton administration so much about foreign donations coming in to the dnc. >> right. mr. clinton is speaking about that doesn't end the issue at all. there are still several lingering questions about that, the actual possible candidate mrs. clinton will have to answer. it's not just a mat of transparency which i thought that was very interesting. you notice mr. clinton seemed to be trying to make it a matter of them looking very transparent and saying, look, we are releasing this information, we just wanted you to make the decision, but that's not really going to cut it. there are going tor more questions that reporters and americans who want to see if they want to support mrs. clinton for president are going to want to have answered but this is not going away until they really address it. remember, the campaign is going to be very long and it's going to be a long journey and i think this is something that is going to linger for a while and then i'm sure there will be other questions about her record that are going to come up over the campaign, just as the men

that omission looms large given donations to the clinton administration. later renamed the foundation after she left office. >> i think this is a mistake. they are going to be digging out from underneath for a long time. >> gop hopefuls were quick to pounce. >> there is a pattern here of nontransparency, i guess, is the real concern. >> jeb bush tweeted transparency matters. unclassified hillary clinton e-mails should be released. the house oversight committee investigated the george bush administration for its use of e-mails using a republican national committee account. it maintained it was violation of the hatch act which forbids criminal activity. said at the time at the end of the day it looks like they were trying to avoid the records act. if the selective benghazi committee subpoenas the e-mails clinton could have forfeited her right. we reached out to several cabinet secretaries to ask if any personal e-mail accounts. none of whom applied to us said yes. the secretary does not use a personal e-mail account when conducting official business nor has

are coming from someone who served in the clinton administration and would be presumed actually to be sympathetic, but the situation is very stark. i am extremely sympathetic. ask either of my daughters. so i will now turn to dov for his further explication to the middle east. >> i'm afraid i'm going to disappoint the viewers. i'm not going to defend the obama administration. i'm going to take a perspective that's pretty much the same as david's but expand on it. first, this guy used to sit at the far corner of this room, named deborgraf. he was a leading journalist, leading analyst, a brilliant thinker and quite a character. we're going to miss him. i just wanted to mention that because he really was a regular here and contributed tremendously to the conversations we had. i want to give you some context that goes beyond, in some way what david talked about. you've got to begin not just with the debate with hillary. you've got to begin with the fact that the president, as a candidate, and pretty consistently since then, wanted to focus on nation building at home. that was his priority

for 20 years since the clinton administration it's been clear that if you have external e-mails on external e-mail systems that on which you conduct official business you've got to preserve those records as official records. >> what do you make of her statement, i want the public to see my e-mail. i asked state to release them. they said they will review them for release as soon as possible. >> well it's awfully convenient. she's picked the 50,000 pages that she has decided can be released. and we don't have a clue what else there is on those e-mail servers. there could be twice three times that. i don't know, megyn. it's not up to hillary clinton to make that sort of decision. it's up to federal records officials. >> but what about those who say lots of officials have private e-mail accounts, have and had including secretary state colin powell. >> i mean two wrongs don't make a right here. and i'm not 100% certain what the circumstances of colin powell's records are but i'm not here to defend him either. it was well-known when colin powell was secretary of state that you preserved private

the clinton administration opened up the technology to commercial applications that unleashed a flood of innovation that continues today. consider the mapping of the human genome. >> the dna is in there. >> according to the patel memorial institute, the federal government spent $3.8 billion on this massive project from 1990 to 2003 and among few our entities could have ever afforded it. >> we're here to celebrate the completion of the first survey of the entire human genome. >> in leading the way, it encouraged others. now a person's dna can be sequenced for as little as $1,000. the impact on the economy of the human genome sequencing from 1988 to 2010 was estimated at almost $800 billion. enough to support more than 310,000 jobs in 2010 alone. if you listen to all this and think the u.s. is on the right track, alas, the problem is, it is not. federal funding for research and development has barely been keeping up with inflation in recent years. if you look at the numbers from the national science foundation. since big entitlements like social security are mandatory spending programs

i was republican staffer when the clinton administration was in office and we had a lot of hard time getting them to come clean on issues related to the north korean nuclear agreement. so this is that sort of tension that exists within the u.s. government's specially when you have different parties in the white house and on capitol hill. melissa: tony, according to the journal the actual espionage didn't bother the white house as much as idea of israel sharing information with other u.s. lawmakers. does this push you're the political guy, does this push the divide further? >> yeah. you have a lot of democrats in congress, very very skeptical going along with the president's deal. i suspect that is why he preferred to go to the u.n. versus united states congress because you have 12 democrats in the united states senate. all said they would not support the iran deal. goes to show you with the obama administration so concerned about netanyahu sharing this information with republicans and others in congress because the president hasn't cooperated and shared this with congress. would not

>> no it didn't surprise me actually, i worked with secretary carter in the clinton administration back in the 90s when i was in the pentagon, and he's a straightforward fellow, and i think -- and very thoughtful and logical and i think that's what we heard from him. and i think he said what a lot of people actually felt, and coming from him that means something. that's all good, and i think the military leadership will like that. lou: and if i may, i'm going add my view, i hope like the dickens it's contagious both at the pentagon and throughout the city of washington. your thoughts what's going on in the islamic state. it's peculiar i think to many americans, to think that we have just consigned the fate of iraq and the islamic state to iran, and we are not participating in that assault on tikrit, your thoughts? >> well, to me that's really troubling. iran is mettling lots of places in the middle east yemen, syria by proxy into syria lebanon and, of course now in iraq. so with this large presence in iraq, it's hard to envision how even with the absence of isis that iraq can get back t

administration. democrats have to start looking more broadly than war and. on this day the 1968 residential elections. robert kennedy got in. that was late in the cycle. democrats have to get going or they will end up with hillary clinton. melissa: always fabulous. thank you for joining us today. thousands of finder scope from around the world to join the group. listen to how he characterized the threat. >> posing a serious danger not only to syria and iraq, but the wider region and peons. melissa: that is a start change. here with me now christian white. christian, let me start with you. he is really saying something different. >> he is sort of right. it is a threat to iraq, syria and beyond. it did not fit their construct they have a new state that takes a major parts of iraq and syria. arpa and stopped. contains. pushback. they are expanding the place. there their troops are being attacked with chemical weapons. they have evidence that isis is pouring gas which chokes victims to . todd how does th

this comes on the heels that the information that the clinton administration accepted foundations from foreign governments who are lobbying the state department and puts into question it was her decision making at the state department influenced by those donations and the fact of the matter is by her e-mailing through private accounts on a private server also raises questions of what information is she is not putting out there? because she had has a private server she controls what information is out there! it underscores her judgment and her decision making ability! the fact she is e-mailing about the top national security through an unsecured server! >> i have to jump in here, joe, because the state department has been very clear that there was no -- >> actually haven't! given misinformation about it! >> limited time, please! >> there is no classified information in those e-mails so let's be very clear when republicans talk about this they have to get their facts straight and that is one of the things they don't like to do because if they have to meet hillary clinton on the battlefie

with me white house special counsel during the clinton administration and s.e. cupp cnn political commentator. i want to put up the tweet that was september out by secretary clinton pertaining to this controversy. i want the public to see my e-mail. i asked state to release them. they said they will review them for release as soon as possible. you attended yale but she never read your book. your book was about telling it early, telling it all, telling them. >> i could have added better late than never. this was the right move. she could have done it in 2013 and no one would be talking about it today but she is the first secretary of state, others have used private e-mails, but she's the first one to say, i want the public to read it. and she's ready for that to happen. so i think it is a good move. if it had been done earlier it would have followed my advice. >> you told me yesterday when i asked you the why question you said convenience. did your phone ring last night? were you asked to rein that in or was that the answer? >> so i'm glad you reminded everyone t

other democrats are mad because the clinton administration knew this was coming. or the clinton camp knew this was coming. but they did not have an ability to defend it well. so they're not mad about the indefensible. they're just mad about the defense of the indefensible which puts the pr people in a terrible position because it's actually not a public relations problem. this is a character and judgment problem. and it's possibly a legal one too. >> yeah but the problem is did they think it was better to do this and direct all the e-mails to their server at their personal residence than run the risk of e-mails coming back to haunt her? did they think this would be a more insignificant scandal than perhaps if there was e-mails out there loose to turn over? >> that's what i don't get. at some point they must have said this is going to come out. it has to. you're the secretary of state. everything has to get archived. they must have known. and why put yourself in that situation? >> exactly. that's my point. >> the most important thing, the most concerning thing of t

. >> it was set up -- during the clinton administration, back when he was president president clinton. >> exactly. >> a long time. well utah law makers have come up with what they believe is a solution to the shortage of lethal drugs for executing prisoner. >> so, their solution is firing squad. >> what? >> ya, lawmakers approved a bill yesterday, requiring the state to use a firing squad if lethal injection drugs are not on hand 30 days before execution. the measure now goes to the governor's desk, who has not said if he will sign it. >> 6:21 now. >> troubled philadelphia high school will finally hear music through the hallways. how rap superstar drake is helping the kids in strawberry mansion. >> is he coming to town drake? >> i don't know, i hope so. >> you know, he started at the bottom. >> but he is here. >> is he going to be smear and tiger woods is opening a new restaurant only, he can't use his name. while the golfer was the most famous name in the world of sports probably, can't use it for his business. >> good morning, i'm howards eskin, you will no longer see nick foles as

i would not blame the clinton administration for what's happened there. you can blame the clinton administration for stopping the fighting, but starting at? that rests with mobile village. i have met a lot of americans with the serbian descent. they are fine people. they are proud of their country. in particular the case of serbia americans, i found so many that just didn't follow the events closely in the 1980's. the late 1980's. they did not understand, yes you grew up with muslims and albanians, and many other people . it's the way the balkans work. but, the hatred was fomented as a tactic of leadership begun by milosevic. i'm sorry, that's the way i see it. host: in terms of the way the world responded to atrocities in that situation what parallels would you draw to the world responding to the atrocities that we are now seeing via social media from isis in this current conflict in syria and iraq? guest: i hope the world is responding. we do see those atrocities. it is a little different. the atrocities in the balkans the lockup, the starving, the mass

administration. he said he hung a blue dress on a mannequin during the process for inspiration. critics said there was something a little bit sketchy. they point out what is missing from clinton's left-hand he has no wedding band. the clintons in ss ss ss -- we're going to hear from the artist and the gallery in one of the stories i bet you never saw coming. >> right. what is going to happen to the portrait now? >> well, it's basically on the shelf for the time being. but the gallery said they have a rotation. there are dozens of portraits they put up one at a time. they say it has nothing to do with what the clintons think about it. we'll see if it sees the light of day again. >> thank you. >>> ben carson is reportedly considering a run for president. the wall street journal reports the retired neuro surgery from johns hopkins formally created an exploratory committee. with the committee dr. carson can raise money he can transfer to his campaign in if begins. last month the 63-year-old said he could

let's not forget going back to late 2011 i think it was, the clinton administration, the clinton's, i'm sorry. the obama administration filed a criminal charges against the iranian revolutionary guards corps for conspiring to assassinate the saudi arabian ambassador to the united states by infiltrating people through mexico using mexican drug and human trafficking connections. so, this threat on our borders from terrorists, from drug traffickers and the like is very serious. and i think the general is right to point out it's not just isis. it's iran as well which has very extensive network in the hemisphere. >> i suppose we won't take it particularly seriously beyond lots of chatter about it until something awful happens. >> i'm afraid that's right. i think that's the risk. and, to me, the risk is that the next time it happens, it happens with biological chemical or even worse, nuclear weapons. >> well, i was reading today in the miami herald that there is a young man, shane crawford aged 28, who was raised christian and his mother was watching one of the isis videos and lo and behold t

for 20 years since the clinton administration it's been clear that if you have external e-mails on external e-mail systems that on which you conduct official business you've got to preserve those records as official records. >> what do you make of her statement, i want the public to see my e-mail. i asked state to release them. they said they will review them for release as soon as possible. >> well it's awfully convenient. she's picked the 50,000 pages that she has decided can be released. and we don't have a clue what else there is on those e-mail servers. there could be twice three times that. i don't know, megyn. it's not up to hillary clinton to make that sort of decision. it's up to federal records officials. >> but what about those who say lots of officials have private e-mail accounts, have and had including secretary state colin powell. >> i mean two wrongs don't make a right here. and i'm not 100% certain what the circumstances of colin powell's records are but i'm not here to defend him either. it was well-known when colin powell was secretary of state that you preserved private

she is running the clinton administration and uses that one? i want to know if it is strong yoga power yoga or bic ram? >> protest continue in ferguson missouri with the manhunt still on for whoever shot to police officers. we have the latest. and new developments on the flag banning controversy at uc irvine. so why much uproar over the cherished symbol of freedom. start investing for my retirement. transamerica made it easy. [ female announcer ] everyone has a moment when tomorrow becomes real. transamerica. transform tomorrow. hey pal? you ready? can you pick me up at 6:30? ah... (boy) i'm here! i'm here! (cop) too late. i was gone for five minutes! ugh! move it. you're killing me. you know what, dad? i'm good. (dad) it may be quite a while before he's ready, but our subaru legacy will be waiting for him. (vo) the longest-lasting midsize sedan in its class. the twenty-fifteen subaru legacy. it's not just a sedan. it's a subaru. i'm angela and i quit smoking with chantix. my children always wanted me to quit smoking but i resigned myself to th

as an agent neil is the white house counsel, previously served as associate counsel in the clinton administration. also is assistant attorney in the southern district on your end formally a law partner. so we are very pleased to have a neil eggleston with us. again, this was the president's commission on election. the president came up and appointed his commission and happy to have your in love to hear from you. >> so thank you very much and thanks to bob and ben as well into the bipartisan policy center for this. i always whenever i see bob i think to myself that it's clear that i wouldn't be white house counsel without bob's support. and there are many days i thank them for that and many days i curse him for that. [laughter] so it's great to be here and next to bob. so thank you very much for that kind introduction. it's a great pleasure obviously for me to be here today. this is a matter, issue of imports to me and it's a matter of significant importance to the president. and i know it's important to everyone in this room. first i want to take a moment to thank the bipartisan policy center, bo

>> this should make voters i think, wonder what a hillary clinton administration would look like. if while at state no one in the the white house, no one in her inner circle had the courage or even just the foresight to question this practice because she is hillary clinton, you have to wonder how government is going to function with hillary clinton in the white house. usually the presidency creates a larger than life persona. she would be going in with it already. it feels like it would be hard to maintain some checks and balances. let me just point out something else. in 2008 hillary clinton wasn't beat by republicans. she was beat by a democrat. so half the country, the half the country that would be predisposed to the politics and half the country who knew who she was choice someone else. and the other half of the country choice someone else. she has to keep in mind that going into 2016 it's not just republicans she's going run against. democrats -- and, i mean, democrat voters aren't completely sold on hillary clinton. so the last thing she wants is to make these kinds of mist

you know 20 years ago i was one of the people in the clinton administration who was promoting nafta. well looking back on nafta, i've got to be contrite. a lot of what happened after nafta was not so good. in fact we lost jobs. we lost wages. >> do you think this is all about security? in the end? that this is about a neighbor and maybe a crucial part of the world, and we may need them down the road? so we're just going to cast aside any kind of negative issues such as sharia law or their record on human rights? we're just going to turn a blind eye to that because we might need the territory for an operating base later on? >> that's what the obama administration seems to be telling congress, that this is all about xhin ease influence in the pacific basin. >> it may be but it's about strengthening the influence of american-based cornses who have no particular adherence or loyalty to the united states. i mean they just want to improve their bottom lines. so why the administration thinks this is going to help american secure i really frankly have no idea. >> quickly, mr. reich, what kin

he came out of the clinton administration aft the biggest economic boom since world war ii and he could barely get 50% of the popular vote. so i'm really skeptical, in a more difficult time i think for democrats, that he would even be able to get the presidency especially if he ran on climate change. i think climate change is a big problem, i would love to see us talk seriously about having a carbon tax, so forth, but realistically when you talk about raising the price of fossil fuels, which is ultimately how we'll have to address climb changes, the people outside of urban areas -- i drive about 1,000 miles a year but for ordinary people for whom gas prices -- >> an indicator of -- >> yes. part of their daily budget campaigning on hey, vote for me i'm going to make it more expensive for you to drive your car? >> i think it will be more like hey, i'm going to do something about an existential possibly species issue. >> i'm with you. >> i think people kind of know they're the same thing, which is why it's hard to get traction. >> i think it's a good idea to toss his name out there. he doe

business the same is true of the secretaries of state who served in the clinton administration. if an individual uses an e-mail account for official u.s. business that record should be sent and maintained in the system that's been set up by that specific agency. and that is why, frankly, we encourage people, a lot of people don't have a team like secretary clinton does, that's why we encourage them on not relying on them remembering to forward a personal e-mail to the government system. so you can ensure that those records are properly 911 tachbed and preserved. major? >> there's been a lot of descriptions today of what secretary clinton may or may not have done. violated the law, skirted the law, come applied. where do you come down? >> i come down wherever the state department attorney comes down. ultimately it's the responsibility of the state department to ensure compliance with these rules. >> is it the administration, though? >> of course it is. that's why we have been very clear with what sort of guidance these agencies shoumd be following. but each agency eng forces the

know she was again some in during the clinton administration, and then came out and change. the big unchecked box is where does she stand on core issues related to corporate power and economic populism? will she be willing to again, invest in a big idea like dead-free college at all public universities, or taking on the big wall street banks? we're very hopeful she will understand this moment that we're living in and come forward with some big ideas. the goal of today's readyforboldness.com campaign was to incentivize her, show her she won't by alone if she takes these positions, that there are a lot of democrats, including the very important states of iowa and new hampshire ready to be there with her. >> adam you're convinced if elizabeth warren ran, that's what she would run on? >> they see are definitely priorities of elizabeth warren and others could run as well. we could basically see if there's a robust primary, a race to the top, a competition to see who can embrace elizabeth warren-style ideas more, and who can go bigger and bolder but these are definitely priorities

national deputy adviser under the clinton administration. nancy, a few yes or no questions. is iran, are they responsible are they say state sponsor of terror? >> they are a state sponsor of terror. >> okay. >> and they are serious foe which is why we're trying to make sure they do not get a nuclear weapon. >> and they have funded groups like hezbollah and other groups and the five continents the prime minister talked about today, that's an accurate statement, correct? >> yeah. you deal with your enemies -- we talk to the soviet union while they're the evil empire -- >> got it. just trying to lay facts out. and they have threatened repeatedly to wipe israel off the map, correct? >> well, let me just get the facts. your whole setup had very messy -- >> they have threatened to wipe repeatedly tried to wipe israel off the map. >> the iranian regime supports terror, hamas, hezbollah and seeking a nuclear weapon. the united states is trying to stop that through -- >> you're not answering my question. >> i did. >> the iranians have threatened repeatedly to wipe israel off the map,

remember, mark ginsburg who was, you know in fact clinton administration who was the head of this in 2013 mysteriously resigns by december 19th and 2014. he gets the heck out of dodge and says i'm no longer in charge. who was in charge and who made the decision that they were going to link up some time last year that they were going to link up with v-15 which is explicitly political organization designed to defeat benjamin netanyahu? they publicly declared that was their number one goal. >> karl, the decision whether or not to reelect prime minister netanyahu is probably not israel's business. to the extent we are in these very sensitive negotiations about iran, you know, who the head of israel may have some impact sort of on our thinking or may have impact certainly on the region. >> huge impact. i mean, this is one of the allies that's got to be comfortable with whatever agreement is arrived at if an agreement is arrived at. >> karl, thank you. >> you bet. >> now to ferguson, missouri where two cops got shot. big news and arrests. fox news correspondent steve harrigan is live in fe

. >> it has been 20 years since the first aimed at program started under the clinton administration, and been successful. advocates say they need more cooperation from tobacco companies. they don't want ads geared towards young children. >>> tobacco company essentially compared youth to replacement smokers to replace the half million people who die each year due to tobacco use. and we encourage youth from all across the world to actually take selfie statements, telling the tobacco industry that they're not a replacement. >> they take into social media to spread the message, as well, just use the hashtag not replacement to join in. >> do you want to live a longer life? most every us do. you may want to find a buddy. say lonliness such as socialization, affect a person's longevity. scientists say the linc between lonliness and death was actually stronger for those under 65. researchers think it will take at least a decade of more research to figure out why lonliness affect our physical health. >>> women inspiring others through their heroic battles with cancer and with the help of loca

usf win needed one more win to make the ncaa tournament for the first time since the clinton administration. it was quite a turnaround on the hilltop for jennifer. first half dons on a 10-0 run the senior ties winston led with 24 points and 10 rebounds but byu heated up from the outside. morrison knocks down one of cougar's 11 threes. byu beats usf, 76-65, to punch their ticket to the big dance. >> good night, that is a huge fish! >> that is a huge fish. and that is bob reimer showing off the 125-pound marlin that he caught in cabo san lucas. he says it took him about 45 minutes to pull that baby in. >> i believe it. >> yeah. >> right? >> how do you know? >> huh? [ laughter ] >> whoa. >> i went fishing once or twice. never caught anything like that. >> come on, really? >> what have you caught? >> i never caught one of those. that's why i was asking. >> i'll show you a bigger sailfish that i caught. [ laughter ] >> veronica, this is the size of my fish. okay? email us your pictures to kpix.com and we'll get your story. >> strange looking fish. >> i did not know that you went fishing for thos

throwing our chemical weapons into the sea and hoping for the best. 1972. 25 years later, during the clinton administration, our nation signed a chemical weapons treaty, a global chemical weapons treaty that committed us as a country to destroying all of our chemical weapons by the year 2012. and we mostly did it. we destroyed chemical weapons in nine states, as well as on this beleaguered island. we set off high altitude nuclear weapons at johnson. we destroyed chemical weapons and nerve agents there. we made 20 is, made that 2012 deadline, and in all the military facilities in the united states where we had these chemical weapons laying around, except for two. there are only two places left in the united states where we didn't make the deadline. and we still have chemical weapons that still have to be destroyed. one of them, which has a comparatively small amount of the stuff, is in kentucky at the blue grass army depot in kentucky. the other one which has most of what we got left in terms of this stuff is in pueblo, colorado. and today was day one of the beginning of the end of what we ha

we had of course during the clinton administration a big controversy over the universal service tax so-called e-rate to provide more internet service and hookups to schools and libraries. that was levied by the fcc without congressional authority. gerri: i'm talking about the white us, the white house saying, i want to raise taxes here? i've got the middle class on my list. i'm going to take out the 1%. they're going to pay -- this is kind of rhetoric we hear and now it will come directly from the president himself? that has never happened, has it? >> yes. see that is a pretty big difference here the treasury and other federal agencies embarked on these things with the tacit white house blessing. this could be a direct assault on taxpayers. we're talking a lot of creativity here. the thing to remember, gerri for every word of statutory language in the tax code there are three words of administrative rulings and guidelines and implementation. that is where they will find the mischief. gerri: exactly right. they end up doing with the agencies bureaucracies, end up writing these rules. >> yes. g

he might make a nice member of a president clinton administration, so me better watch. i think he and anybody else she would welcome into the mix. that would be healthy. i think ultimately she'll be the next president. >> you heard the chrisbill kristol, about the two families trading the presidency back and forth. >> the only way to not have a bush-clinton race in 2016 is to deny one or both of them the nomination. martin o'malley worked for gary hart in 1983. he was nowhere at this point. hart got 17% of the vote or something in what against mondale's 50. he won new hampshire and almost beat mondale. i think someone like o'malley could have a shot. >> you do see this feeling against dynasties bubbling up. is it something people vote on? >> i think the really difficult part for hillary, more than the dynasty, is it's tough for a party to get a third term in the white house. when was the last one? it was bush sr. after reagan. before that it was fdr after himself. before that hoover after coolidge. you have to run as of continuity. it's tough for hillary clinton to be t

secretary of state during the clinton administration. joining us from london. what is your take on what's going on. the letter from 47 senators and now senator cruz saying any candidate who supports this deal -- we don't know if there's doing to be a deal -- would not necessarily be fit to be president? >> well i think it's really tragic. i've never seen in all of the years of following arms control agreements between the united states and the soviet union, similar agreements that have taken place with other countries around the world, i've never seen the entire opposition party unite and basically embarrass the country. america's reputation in the world suffered under bush a little bit under obama. but a lot of that is due to the perception that we can't work together the republicans and democrats. and the republicans harmed the country by showing this level of dysfunction to in this case our adversary, let alone our friend. i've never seen it like that and obviously there's a reason that both obama and the republicans think this agreement, if it happens, is a

in the fourth quarter of the clinton administration, there was project modesta. going into the agencies, getting stuff from the agencies, what do we do -- is there a project dese, or project zients? how are you coming up with these executive actions? brian: there is a project zients, but i told you about it, i would have to kill you all. so it is a good question. and part of this comes from leadership and direction from the top, and part of the tone of that the president set. many of you have heard this directly from him, but coming off the election and over the last couple of months was, you know, we are in the fourth quarter. a lot of games get decided in the fourth quarter. that has always resonated with me as a patriots fan. we need to be creative and stay at the effort to look for every reasonable and creative way to leverage the assets that we have to help make progress on these broad middle-class economic themes. so in practice the way that gets manifested is you have the white house policy council, one of which jeff leads, and the domestic policy council.

i believe they look back at some of the predecessors in the bush administration, first years of the clinton administration and said we are not living in an atmosphere where everything is being constantly brooded about in the press and they have been very successful. they did the cuba policy reversal. one of the most political things you can imagine. i have to say, when i was in washington, that kind of thing would have gotten out. and they, you know managed to completely turn upside down an 50 year embargo. that's an amazing piece of discipline that speaks to their success in controlling their information. i see why they do it. the problem is i think there is something to having the policy debates in a more public way and they're missing out on that. >> sreenivasan: is the government afforded any credit in their contention that they have increased transparency of government spending data of modernizing government records trying to put hundreds of thousands of data sets and make them available mean, those are steps they say say no administration before them has been able to do and that helps

jeremy, the cia director in bill clinton's administration got into very serious trouble by having some of his cia information at a computer at home. but nothing like this where in effect all of the electronic communication that she was issuing on e-mail was sent out into a, to a, basically through a private company, to distribute. this is a stunning breach of security. >> right. and that's one of the things that my colleague michael schmitt raises in the story, that we don't know if the e-mail she was using, even though it was personal, was somehow encrypted. there are so many unanswered questions right here. and i think that this story's going to continue to play out for a few more days. >> well, if it's true that she never used a state department e-mail address, we have something that, at first read, has no conceivable rational explanation. what could it possibly be? >> you know what the other amazing thing about it, this was uncovered, basically, by the benghazi committee. and democrats and opponents about the benghazi committee have been saying they're wasting their time. this is j

rice served in the clinton administration i talked to him about his concern that his he has for this country and what he thinks about hillary clinton if she runs and if she wins. >> knowing hillary clinton since she was 19 year old olds i think that she would be very good. she would be a very competent president. here is what worries me, frankly. without a democratic primary without a contest in which hillary clinton has a chance to develop hermes i think and also without a primary in which the issues that we have been talking about, privilege and power and widening inequality are front and center for the democrats all we'll not next year and a half scare republican primary. so i really hope that elizabeth warren runs in the primary. i don't think she will. but i hope somebody, who is making -- who is raising the questions and themes that i am now raising. >> you don't think hillary will? >> if she doesn't have a primary challenger, i don't think she will raise these issues on her own. they are controversial. they are difficult. i am not sure that she is going to bited hands that fee

director brennan: i was the president's daily briefer in the clinton administration. had the honor to bring to the president every day, the intelligence jewels. the director of national intelligence is the president's primary advisor. so he will go to the oval office and present the president's daily brief as well as any additional information. c.i.a. basically provides most of the input into that pdb. we have responsibility for that pdb that continues to endure. it is a very, very impactful -- charlie: so, what is the difference in briefing bill clinton and barack obama? who asks the better questions? [laughter] director brennan: oh, boy. they're two of the most impressive individuals i've had the opportunity to engage with. charlie: having said that. director brennan: they have tremendous ability to absorb information. i was briefing president clinton on something. i would brief them on something new and he would be able to bring it back up and i would have forgotten it. the same thing with president obama. they both have voracious appetite for information. charlie: