clinton might never have been impeached if not for them. it was jim mcdougal who had convinced the clintons to invest in whitewater, and they had other financial ties as well. so when jim and susan landed in legal trouble for fraud -- >> if i'm found guilty, i'll go to the slammer. >> whitewater development is not going to go away. there are too many questions. >> the clintons came under fire too. >> questions have been raised about the clintons' financial and personal involvement with mcdougal. >> in the end, nothing came of it in terms of the clintons themselves, but it planted a seed for something much bigger, something that would lead to this ultimate constitutional confrontation. >> there was a growing drumbeat for an independent counsel to investigate whitewater. >> we did nothing improper, and i have nothing to say about it. >> thank you. >> old story. >> clinton had a fateful choice to make -- block a special counsel and take a beating in the press. >> it appears to be a case of the president's past coming back to haunt him. >> or g

trent lott joins in during the impeachment trial of bill clinton trent lott joins us for a wide ranging one on one including thoughts on donald does for a wide ranging one on one including thoughts on donald trump the 2020 campaign and what he learned from his experience from the 2020 campaign and what he learned from his experiences with impeachment proceedings he joins me from washington says with impeachment proceedings he joins me from washington d.c. president trump has called the impeachment inquiry d.c. president trump has called the impeachment inquiry. and a scam vice president pence calls it a disk hoax and a scam vice president pence calls into scrapes what does trent lott corps. well grace what does trent lott corps. well. it concerns me it bothers me having been through it i don't think it's good for the company it concerns me it bothers me having been through it i don't think it's good for the country i worried both during the nixon impeachment proceedings and on tree i worried both during the nixon impeachment proceedings and the clinton process in the senate i didn't wan

clinton's behavior did likewise. that his behavior changed what children thought was appropriate in terms of dealing with sexual mores, in terms of what could be viewed as being honest. i would say this is the nature of the presidency -- presidents of both parties, especially those with forceful personalities, and bill clinton had a forceful personality, and theirdonald trump -- daily presentation to the country really permeates the culture in ways that i think we will see for some time. host: this is the fourth time that the house of representatives has taken the impeachment process, in the case of andrew johnson, which was -- or was not impeached. richard nixon. the second time was with bill clinton. december of 1998. after the house voted on impeachment, here's what he told his supporters from the rose garden. [video clip] >> this is something i've felt strongly all my life -- we must stop the politics of personal destruction. [applause] we must get rid of the poisonous ,enom of excessive partisanship obsessive an

that's what saved bill clinton. during the 1998, the year of the starr scandal, president clinton doubled funding for head start, passed a child care any tich, child support, nursing home standards, class size. the wye accords, the kyoto accord and operation desert fox. president clinton didn't have a house or a senate. he got all of that done and it made life better for folks. so i think this were more forgiving. >> up next, bill barr's. >> why american allies might be clinching their teeth. be right back. most people think of verizon as a reliable phone company. (woman) but to businesses, we're a reliable partner. we keep companies ready for what's next. (man) we weave security into their business. virtualize their operations. (woman) and build ai customer experiences. we also keep them ready for the next big opportunity. like 5g. almost all the fortune 500 partner with us. (woman) when it comes to digital transformation... verizon keeps business ready. ♪ want your skin to glow? like "woah". try new b3 powered s

they bet on hillary clinton. the president met with hillary clinton before the election and of course, president trump wins. and the ukrainian government is incredibly concerned that effectively, the new president, president trump will cut them off. as josh that, the aid might get cut off. so there is this intense campaign to try to win trump over. that includes flattery and politically expedient trade deals like buying coal from western pennsylvania which might help in the re-election. it involves embracing rudolph giuliani. all in aid of trying to get this military weaponry, particularly, that they hope the president will sell to them. so as you said, kind of laying the groundwork for this very transactional relationship that trump then brings to the next president excellence which has gotten trump into the impeachment inquiry now. >> the president went so far as to suggest that ukraine wasn't a real country. in what context did he say that? >> he was briefed by kurt volker and many others who were looking for

for clinton,nt justice tops politics, tell us what you're saying. guest: the founders of our country deserve our respect, they were specific about impeachment. it had been abused in parliament in england for a couple hundred years and they were afraid of too many impeachments. they made it difficult but they did feel, because they were creating a presidency that had a fair amount of power, that they had to make it possible to terminate a presidency that was essentially acting against the interest of the united states or violating the public trust. that is exactly the approach that our country took. and they required an oath in the constitution. we hear the oath every four years, and members of congress have to take an oath. but there's a separate requirement that those who sit in the trial and impeachment in the senate have to be there, they have to vote and the oath requires you to say under oath that i will do impartial justice, so help me god. to have an invitation political battle, it's an invitation to listen to the evidence and do impartial ju

process in the senate the nixon impeachment proceedings and the clinton process in the senate i did want to do damage to the presidency in the process and i did want to do damage to the presidency in the process. and i was worried and i was told that involve all about his opponent and that at. i could stone it then i think we 6668 aided in the not doing been dating a major major but it's not a good good process it's not that not a country but the more let a country so for the lead to better lives chances. so to further divides us and i would caution that an immigrant. in the crowd archbishop caravan will roll the democrats in the house be careful what you wrought. because it was a big call it was it back you look back. and the republicans voted the republicans voted to impeach to a bill pay clinton in the southwest and in the end how kalmoe sort of said it and you had to truncate imo with the sense that it was we had the trial the house and in some sort of out of his historic dark parekh. change last fall seat seat that house republican republican publicans also all see all seats so

and so we don't have any of the safeguards the clinton team put in place. it raises a lot of questions for legal experts because the worry here is that in giving free legal services to the president, which rudy guiliani says he's doing, you could potentially be giving him a valuable gift. that exposes him to undue influence. then in the case of jay sekulow where we don't understand his income streams, other people, outside interests, could be coming in, trying to influence these people who are close to the president and providing him with services. >> as you reported out this story did paul manafort's name come up or loom large, given he oddly worked for free during the campaign, which again, in and of itself was not illegal, but he ultimately was convicted of many crimes that relate to the same kind of corruption that made people question why someone who was in debt and worked so hard to travel around the world trying to make money was suddenly interested in working for free? >> i think you're absolutely right, that paul manafort is a good example of sort

he backed hillary and campaigned for you refused to vote for hillary clinton and voted for the green party presidential candidate jill stein given how narrow trumps electoral college victory over clinton was in the specially in those 3 states and given how utterly all for the trump presidency has been kids in cages the muslim by the wall the white nationalism on full display surely you must now regret that decision not to back in your eyes the lesser of 2 evils hillary clinton in 2016 well i don't think that my vote would have been the one vote to push hillary killed clinton across the line one we've got to recognize bernie sanders was treated unfairly by the democratic party establishment if they had been fair there was a good chance he would have won and yet i'm clearly conveniently ran against i know because we disagreed and we disagree at all and that is my non-value added i'd rather forget bernie for a moment just looking outside of what i'm us them i'm a disagreement ok but look just looking back at what trump has done over 3 years do you think not just you personally obviously

for nixon and for clinton, nixon's impeachment was started with 410 votes. this very vote would have gotten 410 votes under nixon, with clinton, it was over 360. and that's the kind of bipartisanship you should do impeachment on. >> times have changed. >> they sure have. >> i agree with you. >> and you know, that matt. times have changed. we are in a very partisan climate. and not just from the democrats, from the republicans. it's a very partisan climate. you would never have that today. that is not a standard. and by the way,s that also not a constitutional standard. >> that's not true. >> you would never have that. >> the president has talked about this. >> his own tax cut didn't get bipartisan support, we're not in that world right now, matt. >> let me be clear here. i think it is awfully important, when it comes to impeaching a president, because even with those 300, over 360 votes on clinton, having tons of democrats, agree that president clinton should be impeached, the republicans still paid a price, when it looks ike you're partisan with impeachment

one republican senator goes after president obama and hillary clinton's emails. a member of the left-wing national media is claiming the u.s. constitution is wrong on the definition of impeachment. we'll ask presidential historian doug wead about that and more. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. i wish i could shake your hand. granted. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ david: breaking news regarding the future head of the department of homeland security. a spokesman says chad wolf has not been named as the new acting homeland security secretary. he is one of the candidates but no decision has been made. he was chief of staff to dhs secretary kirstjen nielsen. alison camerota use an exchange with matt schlapp to suggest the constitution has it wrong on impeachment. >> if there are no crimes and if they don't come forward with articles that show any criminality,. >> it does haven't to be a crime. a crime is not the standard. it doesn't have to be a crime. you know that. >> it has to

you predicted that hillary clinton would jump in the race. watch this. >> tucker: i think hillary clinton wants to get in the race. >> i think she will absolutely get into the race. >> tucker: of course she is getting in. >> any candidate who has a book tour with a random book, they are running for something. >> tucker: he joins us tonight. as part of our on-going effort to update our predictions, mine and yours, i wanted to check in with you. you are a well connected democrat and ask you do you still think that hillary clinton is getting? if so when? what are her prospects? >> i think her prospects are higher now that she will get in. the recent polling shows there is a 4 way split at the top of the race. we may have 4 separate winners for each of the early primary states. mayor pete iowa. bernie new hampshire and joe biden south carolina and warren wins nevada. going into super tuesday you have no frontrunner. hillary clinton has 100% name recognition and a fund-raising base and a clear reason to run. a rematch of 2016 where she won by over

the clinton impeachment, he was impeached and not convicted in the senate. that has been aired over and over. what has happened there is fully in public record. he was impeached for lying and not quid pro quo. i believe that the two are pretty separate issues. one is a private affair with an inappropriate relationship. today, one is an inappropriate use of presidential power. i think that rather than focus on these conspiracy theories and clinton did something wrong and it is ok for trump. the question before the country right now is is it appropriate hill take you to capitol for testimony from fbi director christopher wray. you are watching live coverage on c-span. good afternoon. this hearing will come to order. we want to thank our witnesses for service to your country and taking the time for your testimony. way,was not planned this but this marks the 10 year anniversary of the shooting at fort hood. it underscores what we

something peter strzok was probing hillary clinton for. peter strzok using unsecure devices, where his wife found out he was the reportedly having an affair. i am elizabeth macdonald, the "evening edit" starts right now. ♪ elizabeth: welcome to the show, you are watching the fox business network. impeachment hearings have resumed after recess, 4 officials testified. vin than answered a lot of question. >> clarify, in hig my advisory capacity, i advise up the chain of command that is what i do. >> and your military culture and to attach that culture that meaning to those words to someone who never served. >> representative, i made that judgment, i stick by that judgment. >> you testified in the deposition that you did not know who the whistleblower was. or is. >> i do not know who the whistleblower is. elizabeth: e edward lawrence at white house with more. reporter: the man who filed original complain, sort of flagging the phone conversation between president trump and ukraine president in july, president president trump pushing back, cal

every consideration that was given bill clinton, bill clinton's lawyers, the minority party, are all denied here because of the end of the paragraph it says the same thing, it goes, at the discretion of the chairman. he said he wanted the whistle-blower. republicans gave a list -- they said no to every republican witnesses, and a cherry picking the two witnesses they think will be most favorable to them and not the ones that would destroy their narrative. what committee in the senate could call witnesses and investigate hunter and joe, because i identified the laws i believe joe biden broke? >> the allegation against hunter biden is that he had a conflict of interest by serving on the board, and that joe biden weighed in to have the prosecutor fired because he was getting close to his son. the state department talked about the conflict of interest, and there is a reasonable investigation to be done here. the foreign relations committee has jurisdiction over the state department. but let me get back to the point you just made. what's happening in the house is basically unamerican. no

if you remember back in the clinton years, republicans thought clinton got away with nhought clinton got away with he got away with whitewater, he got away with file gate, travel gate, and when monica lewinsky happened, they got him. democrats feel this way. they couldn't get him on russia, they couldn't get him on ther heemoluments clause, couldn't gt him on other business stuff, and when ukraine happened, they just jumped. >> laura: ed henry, i understand you might have some news tonight about the communications team at the white house vis-a-vis impeachment. >> sources close to the white house are telling me theyn are closing in on bringing tony saig, you remember him, he was a fox news contributor, he worked at the treasury department, instrumental in helping shape the message on the successful tax cut by president trump. bring him in as a lead spokesperson on impeachment pushback. why this would be significant is remember some of the troubles the staff had-- the acf had, explaining this back in the clinton days, of course, the context here, sometimes you've got to get it out of t

it was unbelievable what we had, clinton. we had everything i tried for three years to get it on to no avail. all coming out new revelations and i freaking had all of it i'm so pissed right now. >> sean: i don't blame her. we did reach out for comment. not all the reporting met our standards to air but we have never stopped investigating the story. yeah, right alan dershowitz mentioned in this tape. he has repeatedly denied and threatened to sue anyone makes false allegations any wrongdoing in his case only roll is. one point until he regretted it. radicals of resistance revenge. plot remake america host of justice saturday nights 9:00 judge jeanine pirro. anyway media reporter joe concha. all right. judge, i'm look looking at this here. unbelievable. we had everything. allegations about prince andrew. afraid they might lose the interview with kate we had clinton. she had pictures. she gave us all the details. doesn't sound like she had anything but all the facts and ripping and ready to go to me. why would abc spike that. >>

it was just over a month for clinton. about halfway through there was a vote to also dismiss those charges. >> a surprise twist today that could bring a quick end to a senate trial that has paralyzed congress. the unpredictable senior democrat says the trial should end, that the senate will never have the votes to convict the president. >> that was a major move. in a few days there was a vote on the motion to dismiss, and it failed. >> on this vote, the yeas are 44, the nays are 56. the motion is not agreed to. >> and that senate case was effectively managed or prosecuted by 13 house members that included then congressman lindsey graham. he argued the president does not have to commit a formal statutory crime to merit being kicked out of office. >> you don't even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job in this constitutional republic if this body determines that your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role. impeachment is about cleansing the office. impeachment is about restoring honor

in the house when the republicans voted to impeach bill clinton in the house and it came over the senate we had the trial the house and a sort of historic and it came over the senate we had the trial the house and the sort of historic. change lost seats the house republicans also see. change lost seats the house republicans all seats so you know it's you've got to be very careful how you proceed on this the so you know it's you've got to be very careful how you proceed on this the best way if you want to move a president is golden election but also best way if you want to be the president is called an election but also there are good lawyers i'm sure and partisans on both sides of the aisle they're good lawyers i'm sure and partisans on both sides of the hour all that bill like you know there are things here that need to be looked into the question is hide that bill like you know there are things here that need to be looked into the question is how do you do it and what is the in result going to be in terms of you know the country itself it really what bothers me is that the congress say

and below bush 43 and clinton. we are with ed whelan talking about the federal judiciary and success rate of the trump administration in appointing -- confirming nominees. we go to patrick, woodbridge, virginia. democrats line. caller: good morning. it's my understandsing that the american bar association has basically given f grades or unqualified reviews to several of trump's judicial nominees. yet they still get passed. lso i'm also -- i also think that usually a senator from a state or a judge is nominated from usually has to give their support to that judicial nominee. there's been several that have not had that. after the 2020 election, let's say the democrats take back the senate and the white house, can they begin impeaching some of ese unqualified conservative activist judges? that's my question. guest: well, the caller is right there have been a very small number of nominees who have received the not qualified rating. the a.b.a. itself has emphasized how high its ratings have been for some of the nominees

the clintons. in 016 hillary run for president she was expected to win. an abc epstein bombshell would have exploded all over the campaign. and abc didn't want to hurt the future president. apparently nec wanted to maintain a friendly relationship. >> e-mails in the headlineses once again with report -- can you believe that? here we go again. >> abc wanted to protect their access and their profits and didn't want to be on the wrong side of history. but they were on the wrong side -- abc news now has to answer this question. how many children were raped by epstein in the three years after they spiked the story? "watters world" is call for an independent investigation into abc news. we're talking about teenage girls here. children -- 14, 15, 16, 17-year-olds. does abc care about children? they say they care about children in cages at the border but there are children being sexually assaulted by epstein and in palm beach, in manhattan, on planes -- remember bill clinton flew 26 leg had on epstein's plane. and then lied about it. we have the flight records he

even a clinton connection but the network shut it down. she told me everything she had pictures, she had everything she was in hiding for 12 years and convincece her to come out and convince her to talk to us. it was unbelievable what we had clinton, we have everything. it is i so sad. released a statement -- as a journalist as a the epstein story continued to unfold last summer. i was caught in a private moment of frustration. i was upset that an important interview ii had conducted request virginia roberts didn't air because we could not obtain sufficient corroborating evidence to meet abc's editorial starngdzal of better allegation. in the years since no one has ever told me or the teal to stop reporting, on jeffrey epstein. the statement reads like she had a gun to her head. abc had victims and witnesses on the record photographic evidence fingering epstein fingering british royal family. with a bill clinton angle -- and that department meet abc editorial standards -- what the hell are abc editorial standards? abc smeared kavanaugh wit

seat, in mind sight, says bill clinton should have resigned. i don't know if he would have necessarily survived today. having said that we have a president today who has been accused of various things, and he is still president and he's not been forced out. in fact, he was elected even after some of these allegations had been made. it's hard to say. >> go ahead. >> that point is really important because it shows how far we've come not only from bill clinton but also gary hart to the present situation, where the raging debate over president trump's, one of his many is not whether or not he had sexual relations with an adult film star, it was which bank account did they pay for it out of. no one is disputing, really, the fact that he did something that in previous iterations of the presidency, would easily have left have led to removal from office or at least would have been a scandal far beyond the question of campaign finance. >> i think that's right, although, for the record, he doesn't officially deny that he did anything with her. it's inter

it's a public service to get a regular update on you and how the clinton foundation is doing. how is it doing? [laughter] >> it's not doing well, tucker just consider this number. the past year, the clinton foundation literally raised 10% of what it did in 2009, the first year that hillary was the secretary of state and the international numbers were even worse. they had all the money flowing in when hillary was the chief diplomat, and in light of the testimony the number one country for giving was not great britain, it was ukraine. w all the money is dried up literally, the clinton foundation had a hard time raising money because they don't have influence to sell, they sell. now, i think, it's the primary evidence for what the clinton enterprise was all about. >> tucker: what about the women and girls they were empowering? [laughter] >> yeah, i mean, look, they still have the programs and the clintons have a lot more time than they did in the 2015 and 2016 to spend building up the foundation. but it just hasn't happened and look, one of the most interesting things that came o

newt gingrich gave every due consideration to bill clinton. to bill clinton's attorney, david kendall, and to the democrats and to the ranking members as well as the majority. correct? >> correct. but even more basic than that, sean, is that in both the nixon impeachment in '74 and the clinton impeachment on which we were on opposite sides in '98, there was a crime. there was clinton lying under oath, richard nixon basically covering up a burglary at the democratic national committee headquarters. so, when you have a crime it's different. what is the crime, exactly, that president trump is alleged toru have committed? if you don't have a crime, then what is this impeachment really all about? i mean, if we really want to find out what happened in ukraine, then let the impeachment call every politician republican and democrat who is fed at the trough. i want to know every lobbyist, every relative of politician or lobbyist who has gotten money from ukraine. let it all hang out. republican and democrat. let's see. >> sean: release the transcripts,

we've got nixon, we've got clinton. this feels more like watergate than the clinton impeachment. as somebody who's been on the other side of the republican attack machine on advising hillary clinton, how much faith do you have that the current information environment means that facts can come out, that people are persuadable, that the 40% of the country that continues to approve him can be brought to the other side? >> naively, probably more than you'd think. >> really? >> really. >> i am surprised by that answer. >> not to a point where this number of 18% is going to go 80 or or 100%. but if you look back at the last two years when facts have been entered into the public debate, whether it was the mueller indictments, the don junior phone call, the needle has moved. there's a reason why the numbers are going up despite the fact that there hasn't been a single hearing. i actually go forward a little bit, because he's going to be impeached. that is a foregone conclusion. he is unlikely to be removed. but what is hopeful is that balance will be restored come november 4th, the day a

does that, i mean, is clinton right? it's better just to stay out of it and let the democrats kind of create the scene that they're creating for themselves? >> well, look, at the time i was part of devising a strategy that says, look, in any crisis the most important thing to americans -- and even in corporate crises -- is can the leader continue to lead the country effectively. that's the most important thing when we delivered the state of the union or went to united nations, the country said, look, the president's the president x this whole impeachment thing will play itself out. then we appointed a group of people to go out there and battle every day, and except in those time when it was shul necessary, we kept the -- absolutely necessary we kept the president above the fray. and that's why president clinton had a 73% approval rating which is something you don't see in this country i'm not even sure that given the partisanship it's even possible anymore to have that kind of a approval rating. and our economic conditio

particularly versus the clintonned a -- the clinton impeachment effort of 1998. we welcome your calls and comments. 202-47748-8,000 is the number for democrats. 202-748-8920 one for republicans and forment ins and all others, that's 202-748-8002 you can also 202-748-8003. at the constitution says very little about it. article one, section two, clause five. the house of representatives shall choose their speaker and other officers and shall have the sole power of impeachment and, yes, that's how they spelled choose back in those days. so how did the body of knowledge or rules around impeachment grow from that point? guest: like much of house rules and procedures, it's really developed over time and they sense that we have expectations about what is likely to happen this time. it's based in part on what we've seen in the past. but we have very few cases to look at. particularly when we think ahead to a possible senate trial, we know some things about what that might look like but there's a lot we don't know, in part because the way that this has played out in the p

nbc is protecting weinstein and clinton. abc is protecting epstein and clinton. she is the common denominator. she cannot afford to have her husband in any way upset the one thing that she wants in this world and that is to be president. he lied when he said he was on the lolita express, the plane that took them to the island where they had sex with these young women. he said four times? we now know from the plane log it was dozens of times. amy robach i'm sure is right, buckingham palace, dershowitz pushed back, but that doesn't matter because we're still talking about buckingham palace even though prince andrew was there. >> tucker: i'm sure it's true and the people in charge that have done a very crappy job of running this world are getting upset and i hope it doesn't work. they deserve to be exposed. good to see you, i hope you will be back. >> i love this case. >> tucker: good to see you. joe biden has stepped up his attacks on elizabeth warren as she surges in the polls. he is starting to call her an elitist. kind of an interesting line of attack. i will ta

they bet on the wrong horse they bet on hillary clinton winning the election and so you know they were trying to curry favor with the clinton campaign it's quite evident here and he relates you know to some extent individuals and some ukrainian officials like mr of ark of the interior minister and a number of other people. here in the have been named various points and talks about how there were trying to collect information. on mr amount of fords and on other people as well however i do want to point out that the crux of the article here by mr vogel is he said there was a little evidence of a top down effort by ukraine and he makes a distinction between the russian effort that was personally directed by russian president putin and involve the country's military and foreign intelligence services now i don't think that those 2 things are exactly the same i also mentioned in my deposition of october 14th there are in fact many officials from many countries including ukraine bet on the wrong horse they believe that secretary clinton former senator clinton former 1st lady can was going to

clinton had perjured himself and obstructed justice. we had ken starr who presented a very clear case to the american people. it was interesting, it was clear and it was fact-based. what they're doing today is none of the above. they are taking a very dry subject that is something to do with foreign aid to a country that most people couldn't find on a map if you paid them, and they are trying to basically make a baloney sandwich taste like roast beef and it's very difficult to do that because there's really very little substance there. neil: baloney does not taste like roast beef. congressman, one thing i'm curious, did you know at the time your hearings started that bill clinton had indeed perjured himself? >> correct. when ken starr sent his report to the house of representatives in september of 1998, as he was required by law to do, he already had laid out a vast trove of information and very clear evidence that the president had, in fact, perjured himself, that is, lied under oath in an official judicial proceeding. our job on the j

, and former secretary of state hillary clinton. they reflect it on justice ginsburg's nomination as well as her approach to the law. this is 90 minutes. [applause] >> wow. law the dean of georgetown and it is a privilege to welcome you to the second annual ruth bader ginsburg lecture. the first lecture was held in april of 2018. our first speaker was justice ginsburg. it

one republican senator goes after president obama and hillary clinton's emails. a member of the left-wing national media is claiming the u.s. constitution is wrong on the definition of impeachment. we'll ask presidential historian doug wead about that and more. that our new house is haunted by casper the friendly ghost? hey jill! hey kurt! movies? i'll get snacks! no, i can't believe how easy it was to save hundreds of dollars on our car insurance with geico. i got snacks! ohhh, i got popcorn, i got caramel corn, i got kettle corn. am i chewing too loud? believe it! geico could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. strongve is one of a kind brilliant unbreakable ♪ engagement rings now 20- 40 percent off shop unique bridal styles at zales, the diamond store it's what gives audible themembers an edge.listening; it opens our minds, changes our perspective, connects us, and pushes us further. the most inspiring minds, the most compelling stories: audible. doprevagen is the number oneild mempharmacist-recommendeding? memory support brand. you can find i

that is because former secretary of state and presidential candidate, hillary clinton has been on the air waves promoting her book and we thought that you are really immersed in american politics but that stuff so if you could come and talk to us about hillary clinton and what she has been saying. wasn't that fascinating? i thought she had given us a slightly calm her side to the one i thought she had given us a slightly calmer side to the one that i remember in 2016. she did not hold back at all from wading into uk politics, first of all. i don't know if you got that clip of her when she talks about the russian dossier and how dumbfounded she was that we haven't yet seen it. yes, we do have that clip and here's her talking about the report from the intelligence and security committee and house of commons or the old house of commons and the old committee because it doesn't exist any more and she got it slightly wrong because she said it was a government report, which it isn't, strictly speaking. although it is now in the hands of the government. i am dumbfounded that this government w

yesterday, it could spir the people's pant suit to give hillary clinton a third round. watch this. >> i don't know whether she will look at bloomberg thing, and say it feels too crowded now or opposite, the field is weak, i could come in get 165 thousand, i am tied withed by confident some early states -- biden with some of the early states. kennedy: i think so too, i want her to get in, former massachusetts governor patrick also said to be mulling a late run. will more be merrier in the race to bit beat the orange man the t cheeto? or will democrats see red. joining us now. emily here. with democrat strategist. kevin walling and reason magazine editor at lar large, mt welch. so bloomberg what a condescending ass hat, saying this feels horrible, i better save it. >> he has been trying to do this since 2007, last year the same thing, maybe i'm accounting about it, but -- i'm thinking about it he thinks there is a lane. kennedy: a bloomberg lane. >> but it is joe biden's lane. joe biden has polled the same the entire year, 30%. no matter what. his teeth fallout like robot

it's a public service to get a regular update on you and how the clinton foundation is doing. how is it doing? [laughter] >> it's not doing well, tucker, just consider this number. if the past year, the clinton foundation literally raised 10% of what it did in 2009, the first year that hillary went in with secretary of state and the national numbers were even worse. they had all the money flowing in when hillary was the chief diplomat, and in light of the testimony the number one country forgiving was not great to grea, it was ukraine. all the money is dried up literally, the clinton foundation had a hard time raising money because they don't have influence to sell, they don't have power access to cell. now, i think, it's the primary evidence for what the clinton enterprise was all about. >> tucker: what about the women and girls they were empowering? [laughter] >> yeah, i mean, look, they still have the programs and the clintons have a lot more time than they did in the 2015 and 2016 to spend it building up the foundation. if but it just hasn't happened and look, one of the m

the campaign argues that clinton's original comments are defamatory. they want a retraction and the legal team tries to dismantle the clinton team's claim at the former secretary meant to say she was being groomed by republicans to run as a third party, not the russians pointing out in this letter that she referred to as nesting dolls while talking about tulsi gabbard. but it has not hurt her standing in early state polls. in new hampshire, she has shot up to 6% support among democratic primary voters good for fifth place behind biden, warren, pete buttigieg, and sanders in the presidential campaign is now getting her full attention. she will not run for reelection for her congressional seat out in hawaii. >> dana: pretty clever to do the script them a good way to get the p.r. out there. thank you, peter doocy. the 2020 democratic field may soon even get bigger with reports that former massachusetts governor patrick, a close ally of former president obama is now considering entering the race. politics editor at the national journal. this comes when we

this was a political operation designed to assist the clinton campaign. we talk a lot about the fbi, and doj and we're right to focus on the very bad likely criminal things they did, but it's important to remember that the primary beneficiary was the clinton campaign. maria: sidney powell what can you say about that? this guy made more than $1 million over one year's period to write these studies and yet, he was wanting into all of the trump campaign people? >> oh, yes he was clearly a cia /fbi operative running through the office of net assessment and the pentagon by colonel james baker who was his handler there, and paid the amount of money to do what he was doing essentially under the table, and then the fbi used that as part of the pre-text to interview him, and setup the entire false narrative, framed general flynn, offered the 302's after february 10 to make statements sound wrong when they were not, so general flynn didn't even say though things. maria: you're making another filing public tomorrow, correct? you want all of these charges dropped aga

clinton: i don't think so. i think i will support them and ananswer their questions i way i can.bu owce we have a nominee, to do everything i o do to win. mishal: what do you think about what is happening in this country, the direction o brexit?to ms. cl my real hope is that the u.k. sorts itself out. it is up to thpeople of this untry to decide the direction. but we need a strong u.k. we need a u.k. with smart, leadership.orward-looking i'm dumbfounded that this government won't release poe about russian influence, because every person who votes in this countrdeserves to see that report before your election happens. that should be an absolute condition, because there is no doubt, we know it co our try, we have seen in europe, we have seen it here, that russia in particular is determined to try to shape the politics of western democracies, not to our benefit, but tors th. mishal: why do you think they are not releasing it? ms. clinton: i don't know the answer that. i thk a reporter like you an others should be

usaa trish: hillary clinton is hoping to be the comeback kid. rumors swirling that she won't let 2020 get away without a bid of her own. but to hear her say it, it's because the party needs her and the big wigs are begging her to get back in. >> i feel a partial sense of responsibility because my name was on the ballot and i got more votes but i ended up losing. i'm under enormous pressure many, many, many people to think about it. but at this moment sitting here talking to you, it's absolutely not in my plan. trish: i heard it is. she is in the meantime blaming anyone and everyone for her loss. telling a british audience that sexist social media treats women unfairly. i kind of think hillary might be a little bit guilty of treating women unfairly herself, including a woman who might be her competitor should and when hillary decide to run. how about the fact that hillary clinton tried to bully veteran tulsi gabbard and bury her as a political competitor, calling her a russian asset. >> i think they have their eye on somebody in the democratic pr

and the clinton one was done by the republicans. and what emerged on both the issue you're discussing was a broad consensus. not a complete consensus but a broad consensus of what would count as impeachable. >> that was extremely illuminating. vaung very muc thank you very much. i appreciate it. >>> all right, next, have you been watching how republicans are behaving this week? just imagine how it will be when the public impeachment hearings begin. we're going to talk about what that might look like next. k abot that might look like next. panera's new warm grain bowls are full of good. full of flavor, color, full of- woo! full of good. so you can be too. try our new warm grain bowls today. panera. food as it should be. they're america's biopharmaceutical researchers. pursuing life-changing cures in a country that fosters innovation here, they find breakthroughs... like a way to fight cancer by arming a patient's own t-cells... because it's not just about the next breakthrough... it's all the ones after that. that could allow hackers