one of the acts of this bill. encouraging more people are color to engage in the community where it's been a challenge at times to say let's break through that and find a way to solve that. we have great assets here even in washington, d.c. museum of african-american history is underutilized to explain the story of what's the relationship between race and law enforcement. it's utilized by some, not most. how can we use that great source to tell the story nationwide as well? it's about transparency, providing information to law enforcement and to individuals. this is about accountability but also about trying to build that more perfect younion we can hav. equal justice under the law, have it for all people and senator scott mentioned before, not to be pro-law enforcement or pro-communities of color but pro-american in the process. >> one, i want to thank tim for taking on this task, for all of us. he's the right person at the right time, and god has plan for you and you're fulfilling that plan. trying to bring us t

back on the policing bill. yesterday, good -- going into the weekend, are there negotiations, talks happening between the chambers? are scott or mcconnell involved in this? speaker pelosi: you will have to talk to them on this. it would be important for the senate to pass a bill, one that can pass the senate. and in order to do that, they should engage in negotiations with the democrats in the united states senate. committee, may be the auspice is, i don't know. that is up to them. mcconnell, the grim reaper, who doesn't want to pass any of our bills can't even pass his own bills. they should get together and formulate legislation that can pass the senate and then we can see how we come together on them. we are very proud of our bill. 134 civil rights organizations voted to support, the moms of some of the young people who were killed by police brutality support the bill, we are very proud of it. now the business roundtable has supported it, so the range of support for what we have in our bill is very broad. it

the tim scott bill is close to being finished. i will let you know in the morning what we are going to have judge. >> i want to congratulate cory gardner, steve daines and the others who worke on the great american outdoors act. they will get a big victory the final vote will happen tomorrow on t been working on for a long time. great credit to their effort to get across the finish line. also want to thank tim scott in the groupbf he has been working with on police reforms. i think they havemer amount of good work we are making good progress t i hope we can get a big vote here. it is up to the leader would not get scheduled. i think the substance for that bill is something people worked hard on, have had a lot of consultation leaders in various communities, law enforcement african-american communities it puts together really good balance bill that should have bipartisan support and get enacted into law signed by the president. finally we continue to work on coronavirus relief i think as you all know hearings are going on literal

it's a security bill. every provision in this bill matters to our national security, but it also goes beyond that. i think it's really important that americans know this. with the bill, we're leaving a legacy of our -- for our children and our grandchildren, one that values peace, protects economic prosperity, and safeguards our freedoms. we got to keep in mind, this bill has passed every year for 60 years. it's very unusual something like this would happen. in fact, this is the only way where that has happened. -- this is the only area where that has happened. we do know that the results are there. we know that it's going to pass. if it's passed for 59 years, it'll pass for another year. and we're going to make sure that we put our military back where it should be. back where it was prior to the last administration and so i think everyone should realize we still are waiting for the last shot of amendments, and we are ready to go ahead and finish it. conceivably, we can get this thing done before the augus

>> you know, here we go, bill. we have 150 days until the presidential election and just like in 2016, it seems hackers are targeting both campaigns this time. it is interesting that the chinese hackers are targeting by then and the nation targeting joe biden and trump. at different times it has been different nation-states going after either campaign but both campaigns have said, yeah, we are aware this is happening in so far nothing has happened. but this really come again puts the spotlight on just how vulnerable the campaigns are. we saw this in 2016, a simple phishing attack on john podesta's email and all of a sudden the dnc secrets were leaked and they had to make some staffing changes. so at least this time nothing has been leaked so far. and really one of the security researchers, recapped what had happen and he was very concerned. he was raising red flags sing the lever level of expertise on the phishing emails is really good. it actually makes 2016 look -- >> neil: do you know what the campaigns are doin

bill. we will show you minority leader, chuck shumer's briefing, shortly after the vote ended. ok, thank you all for coming. and i want to thank senators durbin, booker, and harris for joining me today. now, senate democrats just sent a very clear signal that the senate republican justice act lacks the substance and the strong, desperately needed reforms to stop police brutality against black americans. this bill lost, because it was woefully inadequate. it never would have passed, and mcconnell provided no path to improve it. so it was going to lose. the minute he put it together, and the more cynical among us would say that is why he did it. and, we were overwhelmingly supported by the entire civil rights community. i have a letter here signed by 136 civil rights organizations. and i want to read you how they characterize the bill that leader mcconnell put on the floor. this bill woefully falls short of the comprehensive reform needed to address the current policing crisis and achieve mea

let's focus on the bill. let's focus on no chokeholds, no racial profiling, no knock warrants in case of drug cases. let's talk about ending injustice, racial injustice in our law enforcement. let's focus on what we do about immunity in terms of prosecution and the legislation and how we go forward. let's see how we can work together, recognizing there are many fine people in our first responders and law enforcement. many of them want to be part of the solution. but they haven't been, so now we need this legislation. again, statues, this, that and at the other thing, that is important, but what is important we had had no chokeholds, george floyd would be with us. if we had data collection, that little boy, 12 years old. gosh, killed by a police officer who was fired from another jurisdiction and then hired elsewhere. if we had the no knock law in place, we would not have had breonna taylor passing away. and so again this legislation , would translate into lives . and that is what george floyd's brother was ta

>> on the police support bill, getting a little ahead of things, you're proud of your bill the senate republicans introduced there, can you imagine would you support a conference on this, and if you can move things in parallel. >> we would like to end up in conference because that's how congress works, the house acts and senate acts and go to conference and try to reconcile the legislation. it's so important the american people care so much they know so much, they are watching and this is an opportunity that we have never had before as you can see taking all kinds of shape in terms of setting the record straight as to who we are as a country and how we treat people. so again, my negotiators are led by karen bass and jerry nadler, the chair of the judiciary committee, and i'm very proud of the work they have done. it's very different in terms of what it does than the senate bill but they have similar categories. >> to that end your conversations with leader schumer are you encouraging him to let that senate bill move forward to get to that point. >> one of the things you should know ab

as one bill. now, having said that, if senator wyden or anybody else would like to sit down with senator carper and i and make some improvements to the bill, i'm more than happy to do this. and to do that. i don't speak for my good friend and mentor, senator carper, but i know he would share my feelings. and i would extend that courtesy to senator wyden and to any other senator that would like to make some changes. but let me reiterate again, this is a serious problem. we hotlinedbill on thursday. we've worked out many -- we hotlined this bill on thursday. we worked out many difficult issues and we found out there was never senator that couldn't be available. he said five minutes ago. that's why we proceeded. but i'm willing to unproceed to work with ron or anybody else who wants to improve this bill. but improving this bill doesn't mean -- i've only been here three or four years, but i've learned, i've learned the hard way that sometimes negotiations can last years. and you know what sniff a. sai

its bill of fare. the place is called kungsholm. >> kungsholm was a swedish smorgasbord and a puppet theater all in one. >> steve golden was six when he saw his first show at the kungsholm. that led to a lifelong career as a professional puppeteer, who also handles purchases and acquisitions for the northwest puppet center in seattle. so, steve's childhood experience at the kungsholm left an impression. >> you came to the restaurant and you were given a complementary ticket to the puppet miniature grand opera. >> was it an institution in chicago? >> oh, was it ever? to go there was a highlight of a day. >> how fabulous. opera stars and socialites flocked to see kungsholm puppets perform arias from operas such as "madame butterfly" or "the barber of seville." so, 14-year-old bill fosser takes his best handmade puppet and talks his way into a summer job at the theater. soon, he, too, is hooked for life. he becomes an expert puppetmaker and patents a design for a puppet with more natural body movements th

tim scott is introducing his bill. one of my colleagues in the house is introducing a bill that is close to that. hopefully we will be able to come together. jonathan: i don't know if you mentioned it when you were talking about the bill. the bill would start a federal registry of police misconduct and require states to report to the justice department. i have a question from john murphy, who wanted to know, when will the house lift the funding ban on gun violence research? is that part of the discussion? chairwoman bass: it is not. we don't deal with that in this particular bill. we did deal with it in earlier legislation, though. jonathan: and you were just talking about how you've heard from house minority leader kevin california, but no other house republicans have been in touch, have signed on? chairwoman bass: we don't have any republican cosponsors right now. i've been in conversations with lots of republicans. we've been talking about it. a couple of my colleagues were former law enforcement officers or childre

this is not just a message bill. this is a bill that we need to pass into law. right after we introduced it, i heard from many of my republican colleagues. we were in discussions over the weekend. i talked to kevin mccarthy, the republican leader. we go back to sacramento days. there is tremendous interest and we have to strike while the iron is hot. jonathan: when i talked to you last week, you mentioned to me that various aspects of this bill have been sought after, particularly by the congressional black caucus, for the last 40 years. when the bill goes for markup in the judiciary committee, do you have any indicator of which pieces will come out of committee, or is the goal to get all of it out of committee on wednesday? chairwoman bass: this bill will be passed out of committee on wednesday, all of it together. i'm hoping that some of my republican colleagues come on board, but i think it is too soon for them. i would love to say we would have republican support, but i do think it is going to take a little time. next week we will pass it off the floor. i'm

for considering police reform bill. from capitol hill, this is about 20 minutes. >> good afternoon everyone. let me lay out the schedule. as you know we will finish the great america outdoors bill tomorrow. then we will go to the traditional nomination followed by the next circuit court by the morning i'll announce forgo next to peasant will be taken one is we can go to the tim scott police bill or the and aa. the tim scott bill is close to being finished. i will let you know in the morning what we are going to have after we finish the 53rd circuit judge. >> i want to congratulate cory gardner, steve daines and the others who worked on the great american outdoors act. they will get a big victory the final vote will happen tomorrow on that. that something they have been working on for a long time. great credit to their effort to get across the finish line. also want to thank tim scott in the group he has been working with on police reforms. i think they have done a tremendous summer amount of good work we are making good

>> bill: austin? >> that seems right as long as we don't have another mass outbreak. 21-0 is no way to start a game. great things to both of you. steve, austin, great to have you back. messages circling around the nypd, encouraging officers to strike on the fourth of july, amid calls for a police department budget cuts. the corporate cousin "the new york post" first reported this. fox news has confirmed the messages and say that the strike will start at 3:00 p.m. "to let the city have their independence without cops. the nypd spokesperson telling fox officers will be on duty on the fourth of july. americans across the country commemorating juneteenth, a day brought to the forefront by protests calling for racial equality and police reform. in a moment, secretary dr. ben carson reflects on this moment and on this day for our nation. >> those who forget their history are bound to repeat the mistakes from their history. and we should -- what intelligence people do is they analyze their history, both the

didn't even want to debate the merits of the bill, which the tim scott bill probably had 80% of what the democrats wanted to see as a first step. and yet they were unwilling to make a move and married debate the merits of the bill. when you don't want to debate a bill, you aren't really looking for solutions. tim scott said it best, he really did. it wasn't that they will didn't want the bill, they just didn't want us scum of the republicans, leading on the bill. >> jason: senator, law and order will be a key component of 2020. i do not know how a national party like the democrats fight against the border control, against i.c.e., against law enforcement in general and survive. i've only got ten seconds or so. but if you had to guess, right now, who does joe biden pick up as his vice president? >> i will guess either stacy abrams or val demings. but again i don't think it's going to matter in the end because i think president trump will see another term. >> jason: i do too. i think americans when they study this and look at it, i can't wait for the debates. senator, congratulations on

senate passes a bill. that's why you have two houses. then they have to get together and achieve some compromise. the democrats, in the face of demands from the public here in the house of representatives certainly could not have afforded to pass the weak bill that the senate has passed. i think we will have the upper hand, but as is usually the case when the house and the senate disagree, we will sit down and we will come to some kind of a compromise. most often is the case where there's no republican bill. i'm cheered by the fact that at least we have something to negotiate, particularly when we consider how few bills have been coming forward this session because of the coronavirus. >> congresswoman, stand by for me just a moment. we want to show this image of president trump and first lady melania trump. they are at the korean war memorial there in washington, d.c. today marks the 70th anniversary of the start of the korean war. it started on june 25th, 1950. the president and first lady there laying a

but next, i've got bill hemmer. >> bill: have some work to do. nice to see you and have a great weekend. i'm bill hemmer. good friday afternoon. you've almost made it. we begin this hour with the latest where the protesters took over several blocks in the heart of that city calling it a cop free zone. that area surrounding police precinct where cops abandoned earlier in the week. president trump has said the protesters are "domestic terrorists." morning that he would straighten out the situation at the local leaders don't act. the seattle mayor has defended the demonstration saying people are exercising their right to free speech. i will speak with two members of law enforcement, a sheriff, achieve, and a detective. you told is an amazing story yesterday, what is the latest now from there? >> what is very clear now is that the political leadership in seattle has no idea how this is going to end. yesterday in her first news conference and says all began monday night, the mayor said that this is kind of like a block party or a gay pride festival. s

bill hemmer over to you. >> bill: let's get it rolling on a monday afternoon. i'm bill hemmer, brand-new week begins now after a long weekend in america, they are and more protests developing across the country. it has been exactly one week today since george flied in police custody, and we are about to get new details from his family as attorney after they had an independent autopsy conducted. we will bring that to this hour. meanwhile crowds of people gathering from san francisco in the west to fort lauderdale in the southeast. in a conference call with governors, staffers and one office telling fox news that president trump called the state leaders week and encourage them to "dominate the protesters." tensions between protesters and police reaching new heights as we all watch together over the weekend. i want to begin this hour with rudy giuliani, sir, welcome back to the program. we have a few things to go through with you. i guess you have been very critical of some of these political leaders so far. and now there is talk about more reinforcements going to

has read the bill. i see another editorial that says don't do this. so finally it's the who. i have dealt with the problem and is a black man i get the flu that's one of the reasons why went to senator mcconnell and set i want to leave the conversation who has experienced first-hand racial discrimination and racial profiling by law enforcement but im your guy because this is my issue. as a poor kid growing up in a poor neighborhood and i might not come back. this is a serious issue for every single kid this is the issue not the legislative issue but do we matter we had an opportunity for as long as it takes and as many as amendments as it takes to get to the issue that says yes you matter but 56 people said yes. for short. for short. to say yes to having enough information to direct training and resources in such a way that we could hold people accountable and to say yes to having a powerful tool to have chokehold's. but that is the problem by the way. and then as united states senator i experience that

>> bill: has the answer? >> facebook likely in the next decade, workers will work from home permanently. that is what they've indicated. at that as a full-time shift. those wages will reflect that change in the cost of living. other companies -- i've spoken to a lot of people about this. it is up in the air. you might take a cut to your salary because you are saving money. you don't have to have as much child care et cetera. no one is saying exactly how much salaries could drop. hopefully not at all. >> bill: thank you so much. seniority and generosity could help determine who scores college football tickets at the stadiums are allowed to reduce capacity because of covid-19. university of nebraska officials are wearing factors such as how much money season ticket holders donate and how long they have held onto tickets. at the ohio state university, a priority could go to parents and players and students and faculty. most schools are still planning for games and hoping to have stadiums filled with fans. that r

this bill passed out of committee on a strictly party-line vote because this bill, unlike the bill that had been worked through in a bipartisan way when last we re-authorize the surface transportation, this bill had been worked in a purely partisan way. i mentioned, mr. speaker, that the at that time we made in order roughly equal number of republican amendments, democratic amendments, and bipartisan amendments. the rule before us today makes in order roughly equal number of bipartisan amendments and republican amendments. 17 bipartisan amendments. and 19 republican amendments. less than half the number that we made in order when last we worked this bill, when we did it in a partnership way. while the bill makes in order a equal number of republican amendments and bipartisan amendments, again 19 republican amendments. 17 bipartisan amendments. it makes in order 134 democratic amendments. mind you, mr. speaker, i tell you this process has been partisan process from the beginning of the transportation committee, meaning it was worked entirely through on the democratic side of the aisle. a

, their own bill. is that something that you see congress working on? sen. thune: yes, i do. there is not -- although, i will say this. one of those issues, regrettably , i think, could get caught up in an election year politics. i think that there are things that could be agreed upon. there is a range of issues that republicans and democrats are all willing to take on and fix. restructuring, for example part , d under medicare. and you know driving the cost , down for seniors in that is something that there is pretty broad agreement about doing it and how to do it. there are more issues that are more divisive. and i'm afraid what will , probably happen, and i say this with regret, but i hope i am wrong both sides will end up , trying to use this issue in the election instead of trying to actually focus on getting a result before the election. prescription drugs is a very powerful political issue. and it is one that affects a lot of americans. health care every american. and prescription drug costs are

let me go through some of the other issues in the bill, some of the measures in the bill. which one of these are not acceptable? i think that about 80% of all of themeasures in there american public accepts. turnnot know why we would away a couple because mitch mcconnell will not do his job. it banned chokehold's, ins qualified immunity that shields endse officers -- qualified immunity that shields police officers. it combats racial profiling by new training for police officers. it mandates data collection. not please collect data and get back to us. it mandates data collection. it would mandate body cameras, dashboard cameras. it would create a national registry of misconduct of police. i do not know what, if any of those, the republicans are against. why let the perfect be the enemy of the good? i have not seen anything in this bill that is so far out that we should be willing to scrap it at this time. we want to send to congress a bold measure to meet this moment. we are talking about 400 years of racism in this country. we cannot take half measures or quarter measures

what they presented took some of the language from our bill. that is nice, but completely defanged the action contained in the bill. it did nothing. so it was irreconcilable. you go to congress to reconcile a bill. when we saw what they had, that could not happen. now they could work in a bipartisan way to put something together that could be acceptable. i don't think they will accept no action. why don't you compromise? we don't want chokeholds, they want chokeholds. this is irreconcilable. some things are just not reconcilable. that's it. robert: beyond the confederate statues and paintings in the capital, which you have taken the lead on addressing in congress, should art depicting slaveowners, including our nation's founding fathers, come down in the country? speaker pelosi: you are talking about the patriarch of our country, george washington, the author of our declaration of independence, thomas jefferson, no. i don't think they should come down. i do think in the capitol, where we have members of the confederacy, the paintings should com

either within a corona bill, their own bill. it is not something that you see congress working on? >> yes, i do. although i will say this. one of those issues, regrettably i think could get caught up in election of politics. i think that there are things that could be agreed upon. there is a range of issues that republicans and democrats are all willing to take on and fix. part d under medicare. driving the cost down for seniors in that program to something that there is pretty broad agreement about doing it and how to do it. there are more issues that are more divisive. i am afraid of what will probably happen, i hope i am wrong, both sides will end up trying to use this issue in the election instead of trying to actually focus on getting a result before the election. prescription drugs is a very powerful political issue. it is one that affects a lot of americans and prescription drug costs are a growing important part of that healthcare, you know, discussion in this country. it seems like to me, at least, the things we can do and just because we can't do everything does not mean

democrats plan to filibuster simply defending the bill. they should be held accountable by the very american people that they claim they are looking to help, claim they are looking to help and they have an opportunity h to help the amerin people when we vote. so, i urge my senate democratic colleagues do not filibuster this bill. it is a wonderful opportunity to move the country ahead. we can build on the progress of ce last four years of opportunity zones, permanent funding for the black colleges s and universities cut the first step act. let's build on this record, madam president. what's amend as we see fit and then pass the act and then send a bill to the president of the united states and have it signed into law and help our country. thank you madam president. i yield the floor to suggest the absence ofen a quorum. they had a very open conversation with the press.

can you believe that the justice bill, senator scott's bill this bill, does not have anything in it about use of force in nothing about banning racial profiling. nothing about federal prosecution standards. nothing to roll back qualified immunity. no limits on military hardware. i ask you where is the party of lincoln in where is the party of the constitution that says we create a more perfect union to create justice? this bill hears the cry of those who have never been heard. it gives us a pathway for success and i am glad to stand with the congressional black caucus and the justice department. this bill has to pass, the justice in policing act named after george floyd. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. the previous question is ordered on the motion to recommit. the question is on the motion. those in favor say aye. those opposed, no. the noes have it. the motion is not agreed to. the gentleman from minnesota. >> i ask for a recorded vote. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to section 3 of house resolution 965, the yeas and nays are ordered. pursuant to clause of r

there is no way that we emerge with a bill if this is the base bill, plain and simple. and no one has outlined the process by which that would happen. take the ten or 12 issues, ten or 12 issues that are not in this bill in a significant way. i don't know if any would pass on amendment. the way to pass bills in the senate, major bills, let me just say, when mcconnell scheduled a vote this week, he led the senate into a cul-de-sac, a dead end, a bridge to nowhere and he knew it, there is no way a bill emerges from this process. all 100 senators know how the senate works when leader mcconnell wants to make a law rather than score partisan points. you start out with a bipartisan process, drafting a partisan bill, jumping on the for and say take it or leave it with getting the burden of tough issues offer republican shoulders without doing anything. democrats, we are serious about getting something meaningful. we believe there is a path to get something done as a bipartisan bill a base bill, that has a good chance of passing from the get-go and you have an amendment process

it was a big bill. it was done with both parties, both houses participating in the discussions, so that was a good thing. and that bill passed with overwhelming support. i voted in favor, in fact, of the first three response bills, and then there was a sort of a 3.5, a touch-up bill that happened a couple of weeks after cares to add more money to the protection payroll program which was posht. that bill was constructed entirely differently. it was the exclusion of any, any republican ideas, any republican input, and it was simply a bill on democratic leadership supported by the democrats on their side of the diocese and in the house of representatives. i don't think it is likely to emerge as passed from the house to the senate. we'll see what happens. i think the jobs report last week has probably added another layer of what has to be a consideration of this. does the economy appear to be -- is it showing some signs of life? is it recovering, and if so is it necessary to have a bill that is as big as a

i'm not looking to strike anything from that bill. i would also note that the bill is before us on an emergency basis. that means it would be in effect for 90 days. there will be a temporary accompanying it, which would be in effect longer, then there will be work on permanent legislation. i think there will be some technical aspects that will get refined as we get to the permanent legislation, but substantively, i expect, i would be surprised if there were any substantive provisions that were removed from the bill. just because of the nature of our structured government, the council is in a position where it can respond fairly quickly to events like this, doing legislation that you would see in other states when the legislature finally gets around to being able to meet and to adopt. we are able to respond more quickly, and i think that the work that mr. allen has put forward reflects the expertise that is in the committee on judiciary and public safety with regard to ideas. >> there haven't been any hearings on sweeping legislation,

so, bill, explain this one to me, will you? so democrats say they want police reform, republicans offer a bill, it's not exactly what the democrats want but they block it so that it can't even come up for debate and amendment. what's their calculation? bill: wel t calculation is they would like to keep the issue. senator scott used even stronger language. he said this is race politics at its worse and the democrats were during toxic by trying to prevent the republicans to reaching out to minority communities and you had nancy pelosi saying outrageous things that this was an effort to get away with the murder of george floyd which she did not apologize for, dick durbin used token to describe the bill. it really is outrageous. what the democrats wanted is they would like the bill to be done behind closed doors in the judiciary committee, not out in front of the american people and as you pointed out, the shutting down of amendments and this chance to air it at all, there's a lot of ideas out there. the chance to have honest debat

he knows how to pass a bill. he set up something here so it wouldn't pass and the blame more than on anyone else falls on mcconnell's shoulders for not being a straight shooter on this one. but i think now there's real chance that he failed at his gambit that the people in his kcaucus and more importantly, te people of america, will put pressure, moral pressure. political pressure. every kind of pressure on him, and he may come back and say, let's negotiate a good bill. that's our hope, our prayer and what we will work for. >> what's your reaction, do you think it was appropriate for speaker pelosi to say that republicans are quote, getting away with murder? >> pelosi's answered that question herself and what she said was fine with me. that's it. yes. >> and to follow up on sarah's question. do you think that it's still possible that we could see a police reform bill this kaucauc? >> yes, a better chance than people think. because kids are out there in the streets. adults are out there in the streets. america's m

i have a piece of legislation that i hope to be included in the next bill. there will be the state line, nurses and doctors in some states for a certain amount of time they get you for that. so we have a bill that would eliminate the taxation for people who have been helping out in the relief efforts by going into other states tomorrow we gostice act. it has the duty to intervene excessive force and provides more for police officers and that's done a lot to show americans that happens in certain instances that we would never want to happen again a in america i and to provide resours to make sure good police officers can do more and provides the resources to make sure thatofficers were taken ofe field, off of the force. the resources pay for performance and we need the terms of accountability, transparency and training. this is something that ought to be bipartisan and passed overwhelmingly. there's a cple of things it es not include and that is that the funding of the police. i know that is the cry of the liberal left. there's none of us could have supported

he's going to vote for this house bill today. but democrats are also united in their strategy in blocking the senate republican bill. when i spoke to pelosi just moments ago, i asked her if democrats made a mistake. that if they lost an opportunity there. she said absolutely not. she blamed the press for giving republicans too much credit for putting forward a bill that does nothing. she also said that senate democrats are absolutely right in what they did. so after this bill passes the house today, the question is where it goes in the senate. as you mentioned, it seems the only path forward is if bipartisan talks come to some sort of compromise bill to put that compromise bill on the floor. but i'm told from sources that those negotiations or talks have not even begun, katy.

the bill heads to the senate next but the senate is working on a different policing bill written by republican leadership, which focuses more on funding to encourage police reform. aker, the tragic and blutal death of george floyd has been a wake-up call for millions of americans. across the nation and around the world the streets are lined with protestors demanding fundamental change in the culture of law enforcement and meaningful accountability for officers who commit misconduct. today we answer their call. we value and respect the many brave and honorable police officers who put their lives on the line every day to protect us in our communities. we know that most

of that bill you do support, but you ended up voting against sending that bill to the house floor. why? guest: because of the provisions in it that basically federalize all local police departments. my views on this were shaped years ago when i worked for the legendary chief of the los angeles police department, ed davis, and the period he was chief while crime was widened nationally by 50%, he drove it down in los angeles. did he so by following the principles of sir robert peel, considered the father of modern policing, that the principle is that policing is very much a community activity. in fact, he said that the public are the police. the police are the public. the only difference is that the police are members of the public who are paid full-time to attend to the enforcement of the law. this is quintessentially a local question that -- the democrats seek to federalize. that's the part i oppose. but there are provisions in the bill that are legitimate functions but there are provisions to protect the constitutional rights and civil liberties of the people, and that includes th

now, the original bill that the congressman had was a much better bill. the floor, why did this get water down? it should not be a 10 year sentence. it should be life. in his original bill it was life. but it got watered down because apparently the democratic leadership said if you want to vote, you have to water it down. so he did. so this was really more of a symbolic addition of a vote on the floor and i think it is legitimate to have it in this bill. but not like this. whateds to be closer to congressman rush originally had. it addresses just how heinous a lynching is. let's get serious. and i voted against it because it is absurd to have a 10 year maximum mentioned and only talk about conspiracy and say we dealt with the emmett till situation. was a 14-year-old african-american in 1955 on summer vacation. he was visited -- visiting relatives in the mississippi delta region. he spoke to a 21-year-old young woman who was white, merritt, -- married, and proprietor of a small grocery store print what happened in the store was of great dispute. he was acc

we are back with dan, kim and bill. kim, let's take this up one at a time, the issue with bar raised by a whistleblower meddled in the sentencing of roger stone. there enough. >> no, not fair, my new measurei what's going on in washington i look at what democrats accuse republicans of and know that they're the ones that are doing that. roger stone case, there is no question that the mueller prosecutors and that have recommended an excessive sentence that many people within the department of justice simply could not get behind what was recommended more in line with what had happened in other cases in roger stone is still going to serve three years, it strikes me that he's being punished for said crimes. >> this was made this accusation made by a prosecutor who works for robert mueller who had disagreed with bill barr on the interpretation. let's go to the firing of jeffrey berman, last week in the u.s. attorney in new york issued a statement saying i will notnt step down and the a president fired and they did, what do yo

the bill bands chokeholds -- the bill bans chokeholds. it establishes them as a civil rights violation. a policeishes misconduct registry that tracks completes at the local, -- tracks complaints at the local, state and federal level. it improves eta collection by requiring the reporting of all incidents of use of force stops and searches and the demographics of those involved. the bill provides grants for black and brown communities across the country to reimagine how we ensure unity safety for everyone so black mothers and fathers do not have to constantly warn their kids to stay away from police officers instead of seeking help from them. this bill begins to make the changes that walled offer everyone regardless of the color of their skin to be safe. some in the media and some of my colleagues on this committee would like to change our focus from these essential reforms to things like digitally altered pictures on fox news that spread lies about what is happening in my district. were communities come together to re-envision public safet

so this bill, senate bill 3768, which has now been objected to by the majority. i'm still waiting all these weeks -- months now -- for the majority to come up with their nursing home strategy to get the death and case number down. we're still waiting for that. this bill 3768 would provide $30 million in funding. when you consider how much has been invested in other priorities, the least we can do is to invest in strategies proven for nursing homes. it would invest in nursing home workers who are doing the heroic work every day, some of the funding can go to testing and as i mentioned cohorting nursing teams. it is supported by the aarp and alzheimer's organization and other organizations representing seniors, nursing homes and other providers. so this is what we need to pass now to have a strategy in place because we cannot wait for the administration because they seem to have no sense of urgency with regard to this problem. this is an american problem that was created here in response to a virus. no one would argue that the american people cannot come up with a

as big as a 3 trillion-dollar bill on top of the probably 3 trillion-dollar bill of spending that has already gone out urgently in the first three and half bills. we will see and certainly there are some parts of that and i don't think there's any question of perhaps more money in the payroll protection fund, all tell you i spend a lot of my time these days working with the people at the agency's health and human services on a provider relief fund, really that is one where the ideal was to help hospitals, doctors, medical practices that have been so badly hurt economically when we asked him to refrain from any elective procedures, i will just tell you having practice medicine for 25 years and you have elective procedures, that kills yourea cash flow and thats how you pay your overhead every month and many practices of many clinics and hospitals got into significant financial stress from this, the purpose of the provider relief fund was to provide a safety valve for that, unfortunately -- i voted for that but when congress passed there was not much in the way of direction or guidance o

thatriginal bill congressman rush had was a much better bill. got.ed him why this shouldn't be a ten-year sentence, it ought to be life, and his -- and in his original bill it was. but it got watered down the democratic leadership got watered down. -- down because the democratic leadership said that if you want a vote, it would get water down. so it is legitimate to have discussion, but not like this. to what to be closer congressman rush originally had. it tells us just how heinous that lynching is. we had been fighting for years to have it named after emmett till, to do something about lynching. let's get serious. and i voted against it because it's absurd to have a ten-year maximum mentioned and only talk about conspiracy. for those who don't know, it was a 14-year-old african-american who was visiting relatives in the mississippi delta region. woman who is young white, married, and proprietor of a small grocery store there. what happened in the store was a matter of great dispute. sometime after the incident, the woman husband and brother we

appreciate you. >> thank you. >> bill: thanks for coming on the north lawn. >> thanks, bill. >> bill: deputy chief of staff george george w. bush and fox news contributor. what did you think about that information, karl? >> that was packed with a lot of information gone through quickly. congratulations to both of you for keeping it on track. >> bill: so we're on track, right? here is the "new york post" today from earlier. this is fine screen right, this is dangerous screen left. what you are seeing is a rally in brooklyn, new york i do believe. and seeing folks drinking having a beer on a sidewalk on a saturday afternoon. some could apply this same logic to rallies and conventions. do you think that's what is at play in america now? >> we have seen a lot of hypocrisy here. val demings, congresswoman from florida who is under consideration for joe biden's running mate said she participated in the washington, d.c. march and it's hope and optimism. she then attacked holding a rally as being a threat to the health of the entire country, end quote. so, you know, we are likely to see this,

i'm for the bill. i'm asking unanimous consent to pass the bill today with one amendment that just says let's be careful not to arrest people for slapping someone or not to arrest somebody who pushes into someone and get them ten years in prison. this isn't about someone trying to kill another person or someone attempting bodily harm. those people would be included in this language even if they did not have a mark on the person. but if they were rounding them up, tying them up or throwing a rope over a tree that's attempted murder and still be included in this bill even without a mark on them. what we have to preclude and trying to preclude is the bill doesn't get used for the wrong purposes. we're on the same side about who we want to punish and who we should prevent. and we're also on the same side on the symbolism of this, but we can't pass laws that do exactly what all of us have said is wrong with our penal system, all the unintended consequences. there is one here, and i ask in a very polite way,

take us through your bill and what you've heard about tim scott's republican bill. where is there common ground? >> well, our bill clearly is designed to be transformative in basically changing the accountability measures both on the criminal side, on the transparency side as well as on the civil rights side, to ensure that if you have a rogue police officer that is abusive, that is violent, that engages in brutality, that they are held accountable under the law. that is the only way that change will be brought about. we'll see what the proposal is on the republican senate side, but it does not appear to be anchored in anything truly transformative. >> your bill won't have the opportunity to transform anything unless you can get it signed into law. if there were, let's say, two things, two things that you could work from your bill into the senate version, what's the most important? >> well, the national use of force standard that we established in our bill, which is anchored in the principle that deescalation tactics should be used in the first instance, and that de

he wrote the bill. he has been studying and working on and living these issues since long, long before the democratic leader came rushing to the microphones on this subject a few weeks ago. i can certainly take all the angry comments my colleague from new york wants to throw my way. i don't mind. but if he'd like to learn something about the substance of this issue, he might want to stop acting like senator scott hardly exists. and learn from the expert who wrote the bill. the american people know you do not really want progress on an issue if you block the senate from taking it up. they know that most police officers are brave and honorable and that most protesters are peaceful. and they know our country needs both. we need both. the american people know they don't need history lessons from common criminals who are dragging george washington through the dirt. they know prayer is no less essential than protests. and they know that a politician who compares a policy disagreement to a brutal murder has ju

on radical bills that they keep passing out of that house. just yesterday, they passed a bill that was undermining police so they couldn't do their job, they want to give $1200 payments to legal immigrants, they want to give free health care to illegal immigrants. these are all bills that they've passed out of the house and the democrats control the house, the senate, and the presidency after november, all of that stuff would be the law of the land, so i hope our listeners are listening to that. that's why this election matte matters. >> jason: the reason i was opposed to it when i was in congress is it's against the constitution, the constitution clearly spells this out. but there was no consideration of that today in the debate, was there? >> not at all, jason. you are exactly right. and if they really were sincere, they would've sent a resolution to send this to the people for a constitutional amendment as opposed to ratification by the states instead of doing what they did today which is simply a bill, and you are correct. is less than th

most of us, about same change. >> your bill or the democratic bill? >> i can't speak to what the democrats are doing but i would say what we have done is a bipartisan piece of legislation taking the priorities and the house bill, the words of the vice president in the executive order and the fantastic minds behind me crafted into legislation. but the legislation is bipartisan. the question is can we get bipartisan support. >> are there active ongoing investigations going on with changes? >> let me say it this way. if we don't have the votes on a motion to proceed, that means that politics is more important than restoring confidence in communities of color than the institutions of authority. >> on that point, it would seem bipartisan groups of lawmakers get together on big issues whether it be immigration or gun violence or deficit reduction only to have it fall apart. why is this different? >> we gone through a lot in this country. we started with impeachment and went through a global pandemic. i remember sitting and talking to ben sasse about some of

senate bill 3912. if i had to describe it in one bill or one word, i should say, describe the bill in one word, it would be accountability. and i think it's a big difference between that bill, the justice and policing act, and the bill offered by the majority. accountability is vital. it's essential. we cannot move forward and say that we've done something substantial to bring about justice to advance the cause of justice unless there's accountability. the bill also has very strong transparency provisions, as well as a long menu of actions we can take to improve police practices in a meaningful way. let me start with accountability. and we talk about accountability, we're talking about constitutional violations, preventing those violations and holding those accountable that engage in constitutional violations. we could, for example, revise 18 united states code section 242. it's right now as a matter of law, a violation of law for any law enforcement officer to willfully deprive a person of any right p