>> anything that's criminal or not criminal, that will be a question for the doj. we're going to put in front of the american people everything we know, and then the department of justice will make those decisions. >> we see a remarkable thing here where his endorsed candidate candidates, but, again, donald trump's continued lies. if it was pence running, would you support him? >> if it was pence against trump, sure. i'm proud of what pence did regarding january 6. he's been quiet until recently. for every publicly elected official, whether you're a county board member, you have to speak up now, because i tell you, every day that you're sigh le -- silent, your people that follow you believe the lelectio was stolen, they believe the democracy doesn't work for them. follow through on your oath or you'll be ashamed of what you did in office in five or ten years, and frankly, i have no sympathy when you are. >> oyou've been tough on china for its trade violations. the president is now saying he's thinking of cutting tariffs on china goods. is now the time to do so? >>

that a doj probe, what is the standard for a doj probe to find this is not just, oh, we got to better communicate response times and so on, but there was negligent decision making here. that's a question that parents are asking right now. >> yeah. i don't think, jim, we're going to know the answers to that until the review is done. again, it has to be independent. it has to be effective -- excuse me, objective. it has to be comprehensive. nobody can go into it with preconceived ideas. we really have to go in with a blank slate, and interview as many people as possible, review policies and procedures, review training, and do a very slow, methodical, accurate assessment of the situation. >> frank straub, thanks so much for joining us. >> thank you. >>> canadian prime minister justin trudeau proposing sweeping legislation that'd freeze handgun ownership across canada. >> quick, comprehensive response here. the measure would also force people who own military assault-style weapons, like the ones used in the uvalde shooting, buffalo, and so many others, to enter a buyback program. brynn gi

how the eu is targeting vladimir putin's reported long time girlfriend and the new strategies the doj is using to target oligarchs. that's coming up . if you used shipgo this whole thing wouldn't ba thing. yeah, dad! i don't nt to deal with this. oh, you brought your luggage to the airport. that's adorable. with shipgo shipping your luggage before you fly you'll never have to wait around here again. like ever. that can't be comfortable though. shipgo.com the smart, fast, easy way to travel. ever wonder what everyone's doing on their phones? they're banking, with bank of america. the groom's parents? they just found out they can redeem rewards for a second honeymoon. romance is in the air. like these two. he's realizing he's in love. and that his dating app just went up. must be fate. and phil. he forgot a gift, so he's sending the happy couple some money. digital tools so impressive, you just can't stop banking. what would you like the power to do? there's a different way to treat hiv. it's every-other-month, injectable cabenuva. for adults who are undetectable, cabenuva is the only c

former doj prosecutor, partner of a law firm, much, much more. james, that is the law on the books, and i'm a little surprised why the federal government isn't enforcing it. maybe you can explain why that may be the case. >> maybe. it's 18 u.s. code 1507, it's a misdemeanor obstruction charge which means it carries u year in prison. and the language in that statute about picketing or parading at the personal residence of a court officer says if you're desiring to either intimidate or influence them. and that's clearly what's going on here. we have a draft opinion that's out, with we've got a bunch of people trying to make it clear that they think they're living the hand maiden's tale or some sort of dystopian nightmare fantasy, and this is just -- what i think bothers so many of us is the uneven application of the criminal justice system. and with this attorney general, it's really stark. he's a very politicized head of the department of justice. i can't imagine if we had had protests at ruth bader ginsburg's house where a bunch of people with ma

biden's doj is ai peeling the ruling, but we are hearing reports of some sighs of relief from even some in the west wing over concerns the immigration system was not ready to handle the surge at the border that would have happened when title 42 was lifted, david. they've dade david jacqui heinrich, thank you very much. back home and the prices at -- crisis at the border, even some democrats are saying it will appeal the ruling to extend title 42. my next guest is the mayor of rio grande city in texas, primarily a democratic border town, mayor joel villareal. excuse me, mayor. thanks for joining us. i should point out, by way, that you have no party affiliation, so you don't get involved in the politics of border control, but you must be relieved that title 42's going to be can -- to be with us. >> i support this. by way, thank you and good morning. absolutely, i support the decision 100 percent. and i am glad because at this point we just simply do not have the resources to sustain this influx of immigrants. now, having said that, i do say this: both political parties are to blame for o

same thing happened with mark meadows dove the doj has not prosecuted him so if you don't hold them in contempt on the house floor, what is your remedy here? members of congress, if they decide not to cooperate with the committee in this instance which is pretty rare, that's rather extraordinary and they don't do this very often. i don't want to say that this is unprecedented necessarily, but it is exceptional, because you have that internal process, but here's the bottom line. this is what this is all about. the one-six committee, neil, is going to begin its hearings in early june, around june 9 and so what they need to do between now and early june is start to curate a narrative, what did these members know? how involved were these members? of course moe brooks was speaking down at the ellipse telling people to go to the united states capitol and it was time to take names and kick some blank. that was the line that he used speaking at the ellipse the day of the riot here at the capitol. there had been these audio recordings from kevin mccarthy in the days after the riot talking about

doj, ftc is called to take a look at it. i'm not expert in their legal authorities but i would be surprised if they have any legitimate authority to block this transaction. reporter: amid all the opposition now you can add the russians. the kremlin threatening to hold the billionaire accountable for providing starlink satellites to military. musk tweeting, if i die under mysterious circumstance, nice knowing you. never a dowel moment especially on mother's day, elon musk. david: thank you, kelly, very much. sewers san, that is really the message that got everybody stirring. if i die under mysterious circumstances it's been nice knowing you, suggesting because of the work of starlink until a you looing communication from ukraine to continue to get out some putin hit squad might be out to get hymn? reporter: that's right. so, you know, looks like elon musk is picking sides when it comes to this ukraine russia debate and this battle and invasion of course. it was mother's day yesterday and musk actually tweeted in reaction to t

clearly the institution has to endure, not just dod, it could be doj, you pick it. they are very important to our republic, to democracy, and one of my concerns about president trump is he didn't respect our institutions or our norms and that's why it's so important that we preserve them, and more importantly, it's critical that good people go into government and they serve and they stay, even when times get tough, democrat or republican, doesn't matter. we need good people because at the end of the day, these institutions have their cultures but they're only as strong as the people that are in them. i try to acknowledge all the great people at dod, civilians, officers, you name it, people who make the institution what it is and why it's so critical to our republic. >> i want to talk about the future. you said that donald trump is not democratic. or was a danger to our democracy. what is the specific threat he represents to american democracy? >> well, i just kind of spoke to that. this is a cautionary tale in that regard, right? we've got to elect people whether it

words may do some of that, sort of bringing the people along and educating them in the eventuality that doj acts. >> our memories are a little too short. you think about the impact of the watergate hearings and how that galvanized the nation. it may be that we're more balkanized now and we're 24/7 news cycles and that kind of stuff, but that certainly help head the watergate special prosecutors prepare their cases and it would have made more -- if they were to return indictments would have made their jobs infinitely more easy and the things that sam irvin did along with howard baker. those things served a use frl purpose in the same way the january 6th committee would serve that purpose. people are exhausted about this, that might be true, but they haven't seen -- wait until you see the hearings. wait until you see the hearings and then ask me whether or not people are exhausted. >> i'll take you up on that because that is very interesting to look at them. we have so much more to talk to you about, your book and the vote that just went down, and it has failed by 49-51. we'll ask you to stic

for appointing a fake slate of doj electors. that man doug mastriano, he rocked to a primary after a twice-impeached ex-president who endorsed him. pennsylvania's leading far-right figure funding busses to shuttle supporters to the rally on january 6th 2021, that preceded the attack on the capitol. during his run for governor he has bard the news media from attending his campaign events and the qanon conspiracy theory. it is difficult to understate the potential impact of an insurrectionist running, potentially running one of the country's most important battleground states. nbc news reports this, quote, should mastriano prevail in the general election, he will be able to appoint the secretary of state to oversee elections and his choice would re-set the state's voter rule so everyone would, quote, have to re-register. mastriano may be the election truther and he will not be the last as nbc's vaughn hillyard reports doug mastriano, arizona, carrie lake, michigan, james craig and rebecca kleefisch, they'd each be tasked with cert

we're asking you to tell us about you and doj should be paying close attention to that because these three members are being wrapped up as the committee expands their scope and as it is now clear evidence of some kind of prior knowledge by the oathkeepers of ronny jackson's location and then this mysterious, critical data that has to be protected and has to be preserved and is that something to do with plans for the insurrection? is it the fact that ronny jackson knows the true health situation as the president's former physician? is this a man who could lose his medical liens for lying to us at that press conference where no one believed the medical results of the exam. three sitting members of congress. he asked what to tell us what to know about trum or others and themselves and ronny jackson spikily tied into seditious conspiracy defendants, extremely significant development. i believe pause of the current exposure because toj has to look at this, and should we be opening criminal investigations into these three? i predict that they're going to invoke the fifth. you're not going

>> yeah, so, some of them do have lawyers who have been referred to them, but that question of the doj is at top of mind. lawmakers are -- in the house are out at recess right now. they're not on the hill so we haven't been able to ask them ourselves just yet. but when we've previously asked them, they have at least publicly acted as though they were not concerned being referred to the doj, but right now, the doj has done a very good at keeping their parallel simultaneous investigation under pretty tight wraps. we know that they've convened a grand jury, and we also know that lawmakers on the panel are hoping that the doj can hopefully pick up some of the slack as they do have obviously criminal authority to actually make charges that the committee only has in a more political, rhetorical sense, and that that question of criminal referrals is also still up for -- to be decided on amongst committee members. we'll see if some of these members who ultimately may not comply in any way with the congressional investigation get referred to the doj for future investigations. >> it all seems to

and for doj to charging steve bannon. the point of doing that was creating a deterrent effect to force other witnesses to come in and cooperate. so it's not in a vacuum that we're dealing with all of these family members coming in, they know that if they just completely blow off the committee, they will be referred to the department of justice for criminal prosecution. that's a real thing and the deterrent effect is real. second and i saw this a lot when i was down in congress, got to be a little bit careful with voluntary testimony because the committee cannot compel the witness to answer any questions. they're not under subpoena and so they cannot be compelled to answer questions. and that likely is the sort of middle ground that they reach with the family members so that they could protect themselves from being compelled to answer any questions that they didn't want to answer without having to invoke the fifth amendment. all of that being said, a good questioner and there are many good questioners on staff, former pros

again, we're talking about the doj case in this instance. this is the group of oathkeepers charged with seditious conspiracy, the most serious charges levied so far and this is an allegation from one of the defendants who is now cooperating about a call that puts him very, in very close proximity so far. >> if you go into d.c. and throw a rock you'll claim a huckster having a direct line to donald trump. some of those people actually do. the number of people to direct lines to the former president includes shall we say quite a cornucopia of characters. we don't know -- we don't know if the person who took the call from stewart rhodes had a direct relationship with trump or if he was just one of many, many scam artists claim to have such a relationship. the good news is it shouldn't be that hard to figure out who was on the other end of that call because it was a phone call presumably there will be records of that phone call somewhere, and there's no question that justice department prosecutors will be trying to track down those phone records

to trump, jackie, in terms of criminal referrals or do you think their assumption is if they see it doj sees it? >> this topic exactly, nicole is the conversation that's lively debate amongst the members. i'm not sure if there's been an agreement yet, but i want to note the very strong language that was used in the statement yesterday about giuliani. important witness to overthrow the govern am. that phrase has not been publicly used by the committee in quite some time. it does remind me of chairman thompson comments their work last year when he did have an election, we weren't there to steal anything, and -- if they keep coming back, and there wasn't the con pir see. ps his subpoena came last month despite mark meadows and get corroborating opinions bns are witnesses who are potentially more credible witnesses to begin with. we know bernard kerik who testified before the committee months ago along with some of the other people who were working with him and the willard who were working with him in the campaign capacity and who we're potentially dealing with him in the white house. so we

>> well, first of all, doj has a referral for criminal contempt. >> right. >> and doj has had it and had it and had it and had it for weeks and weeks and weeks. now, i will say this, if his lawyer advised him to give out as men checks as he could in order to avoid a contempt filing. if the analysis that's going on, he cooperated to enough of an extent that he's avoiding a content and we can't convict him on content we're not going to try, then, you know, he needs to pay that lawyer a bonus because the lawyer is giving him good advice. we do not know what we do not know, i'll tell you what i do know, he heard from the top justice official that there was no fraud. i know he heard from judge after judge after judge, was there no basis to go forward with any challenge to the election. none. and then he let those kooks in the oval office in the day before january 6th and i mean, he was letting in the mypillow guy, and he was shelling it in and giving him a cup of coffee. who does that? why wasn't he blocking the kooks from the office and that's the question i'd like him to answer. >> the

permanent subcommittee on investigations released a report showing after the period covered by the doj investigation, balfour beatty continued to feel to remediate mold, failed to make critical repairs and falsified information in the database deals uses to calculate their incentive fee. that is really outrageous and really completely unacceptable. in my home city of washington, balfour beatty continues to obstruct building sufficient housing at fairchild and along with the shortage of housing in the community, where bh fails to keep up with right prices, that means that military families are left without housing. some have been stuck living out of rvs for months now. and at joint base lewis mccord, dozens of families have sued lincoln military housing over really to probable living conditions. our service members should have access to the best or at least decent housing, not the worst. we all want to fix this as soon as possible. this budget requests almost 168 million dollars for military housing privatization support, that is $45 million more than last year. can you tell me first, w

so while he has moved a lot of executive actions forward that rely foc on doj -- department of justice -- i would like to see him move more exec of action forward that focuses on the public health action -- angle of this and incense agencies through hhs, health and human services, medicaid and medicare, cdc, and other federal agencies to look at the comprehensively and think through how we can prevent gun violence in this country. why is that important? because for 20 years -- amy: 20 seconds. close the cdc was prohibited from researching gun violence. we want the president to call it what it is, this is a public health epidemic. let's treat it like we did automobile gun fertility's in the 50's. have a comprehensive response. the thing is, it is response. if we do that, i'm confident we can save lives. i think that is in america all of us need to have. it is one that is worthy of how great we say we are. amy: kris brown, thank you for being with us, president of brady, one of the oldest gun violence prevention organizations in the u.s. next up, we go to chile. stay with us. ♪♪ [mus

this is the first update to the doj's use-of-force policy in nearly two decades. the policy is scheduled to take place in july and comes after massive racial justice protests erected in the united states and around the world in response to the police murder of george floyd in minneapolis two years ago. and a senior consultant at shell has resigned condemning the fossil fuel giant for expanding its oil and gas production despite mounting scientific warnings this would lead to a climate catastrophe. caroline dennett worked for the company for 11 years and was based in the united kingdom. she shared news of her resignation in a video posted on linkedin. >> today am quitting because of shall'soubletalk on climate. shel stated their missiois t do no harm. incense honorable they are not -- they know continued oil angas extraction causes extreme harm to our climate, our environment, and to people. and whateverhey say, shall is simply n winding down on fossil fuels, they are expande with new exploration and pansion project against the clear one from scientists of huge ris

if you look at the way that doj and fbi operate, they are law enforcement officers, and what they want to do is build evidence and prosecute a crime, and that's just not a model that works effectively for these actors. it takes too long, it's too slow, and then while they are building a case for prosecution, they can't take the information and share it. and that, honestly, is the most important piece. this is where i'm going to make a pitch for the private public collaboration, and the deep, deep importance of having the u.s. government and its entities and private sector operations that see this on a front line on a daily basis, doing all of the collaboration possible to try to go after this problem set. that's my sort of box. >> i think you hit it on almost all the points are going to make. as we go through, you know, as far as the election situation went, i think we got into a place where we are talking about, you know, capability intent, or i actually recently got into a conversation with somebody from another country who's dealing with a different affair, another, after a known ru

if you look at the way that doj and fbi operate, they are law enforcement officers, and what they want to do is build evidence and prosecute a crime, model that works effectively for these actors. it takes too long, it is too slow while the building case for prosecution they cannot take the information shared. that honestly is the most important piece. this is where i'm going to make a pitch for the private/public collaboration on the deep, deep importance of her in the u.s. government, its entities and private sector operations at sea this on the front lines, on a daily basis during all of the collaboration possible to try to go after this problem set. my soapbox. works wouldn't you hit on all the points i wanted to make. as we go through, as far as the election situation went, i think we have gotten to a place over talk about capability and intent. i had a conversation song from another country doing with another actor a non- russian actor there's a question capability and intent. right now we think russia's got capability the question is whether not they have intent. this other coun

to court and try to get an order from a judge requiring them to testify or you could send it over to doj for a contempt prosecution to punish the person. both of these thing, either of those things will take way more than the three to four weeks we have until the hearings start. as a practical matter, the committee will have to rely on the good will and the patriotism of people it needs to hear from. >> oh, boy. yeah. we'll see. stay tuned. watch this space, right. i want to get your take on new york judge setting conditions for the former president must imme meet to avoid a civil contempt and explaining how his company handled post it notes. how do you see this playing out? >> i think this means the judge just about satisfied that donald trump does not still any documents that would respond to the subpoena from the new york attorney general's office. the judge is saying, you still have to prove to me that what you did with these post it note and what you did with a handful of other boxes. once the trump people can do that, it looks like the judge will release his from this contempt. it'

do you expect the doj to act quickly because time is running out. >> the house can refer them to the united states department of justice for criminal contempt. we have seen the department act quickly in one instance. it's taken an extended period of time with a few others. i think that might, i don't think it's because justice is disinterested or distracted. it probably has something to do with the underlying investigation that the justice department is conducting. it's hard to say exactly what the result will be once this is referred to justice department. i don't expect them to come ply. >> the house voted the hold you in contempt back in 2012 for failing to turn over documents related to the fast and furious scandal. why would this be different for these members? >> well, fast and furious is different. we turned over 7,000 documents. i testified eight or niene occasions. the only thing we had dispute about were things protected by executive privilege were turned over by successor jeff sessions which proved the things we were holding back were only executive privilege and had nothi

if people are concerned about real consequences that will fall to doj. the fact rudy chose to testify today for nine hours when he could have just taken the fifth across the board but suggests te rudy doesn't fear anything the doj has in store. if you're a rational person and believe that doj was seriously criminally investigating the people closest to donald trump for their role in this coup attempt as mark and ron laid out, he was the central figure, you would clam up and take the fifth in a second. the fact he testified shows he's brazen and unafraid whether he's right or wrong i guess we'll see. >> let's talk about current elections now. and the ones upon us. we're days away from some key primary races including georgia. david purdue is trailing pence's pick, kemp, by more than 30 points. of course, he'll try to spin it, right, how big of a blow is this to the former president mark? >> well, huge. i mean, i think in terms of all the endorsements and people that he wanted to take down across the country, that the governor of georgia brian kemp was num

doj is declining to comment but a source tells cnn that doj wants the transcripts to help with its own federal investigation. another source of tension here? doj's apparent lack of movement on that contempt referral for former trump white house chief of staff mark meadows who you will remember refused to cooperate with the committee. >>> just ahead for you, a new report suggesting someone may have deliberately crashed a chinese jetliner full of passengers. >>> and ufo secrets exposed in publicic. be functional. so you can be freeee. bookoking.com booking.g.yeah shipstation saves us so much time it makes it really easy and seamless pick an order print everything you need slap the label on ito the box and it's ready to go our cost for shipping, were cut in half just like that go to shipstation/tv and get 2 months free ♪ ♪ ihoppy hour starting at $6 at 3pm only from ihop. download the app and join the rewards program today. >>> welcome back. china's deadliest air disaster in decades may have been deliberate. a new "wall street journal" report says the black box recovered from the cras

. >> former doj and expert harry litman telling us, looking at the white house press release where they're saying they're going to appeal this, will appeal it on merit how he sees it so this could happen in months, the question, is are they trying to fget it through the midterms is not clear. to scott's point, this isn't actually a republican versus democrat issue, a lot of elected democrats in congress have said what's going on and just allowing the migrants to flood over the border is a crisis. here's what democrats have said about the crpresident's decisio to lift title 42 and allow that immigration. >> right now, this administration does not have a plan. i've warned them about this months ago. to be honest, it's going to be a crisis on top of a crisis. >> i'm going to keep pushing the administration to develop a really strong, strategic plan for how we will secure our borders when title 42 is lifted and i'm going to keep pushing them to delay with the title 42 until that plan is in place. >> again, a judge is forcing that, but that's not where the administration is. should the presiden

the doj has a unit dedicated to antiterrorism presently. you testified that your agency has boosted resources directed toward these initiatives. can you elaborate on existing initiatives on domestic terrorism prevention and investigation, and how you are working with existing agencies and departments? one of the fears i would have with this legislation is that we are creating more information that could slow the accuracy of that. i'd like to hear your comments on that, please. mr. wray: i would decline to weigh in on the legislation itself, but you are right, we are doing a whole lot on domestic terrorism already. we have, i think, over the last three years, and this started in summer of 2019 and continued since then. we have, i think, more than doubled our domestic terrorism caseload. i think we are now up to 2700 domestic terrorism investigations, they cover the waterfront of different types. we have created a hate crimes fusion cell to bring both those kinds of expertise together. we have had some significant plots disrupted using those

merrick garland testified the doj did not target parents. here is garlin on the 21st of october. >> i can imagine any circumstance in which the patriot act would be used and the circumstances of parents complaining about their children nor could i imagine the circumstances where they would be labeled as domestic terrorism. >> so the two republican representatives sent a letter addressed to ag garlin when it says "in testimony before the department, components using counterterrorism resources to target parents at school board meetings. we have evidence contrary to your testimony of the federal bureau of investigation has labeled at least dozens of investigation into parents with a tag created by the fbi's counterterrorism division to access and track investigations related to school boards." another part of the letter lays an example of such targeting things, "the fbi field office open an investigation into republican elected officials over allegations from state democratic party officials that republicans incited violence by expressing publi

so far not looking good, we'll have it live, plus lara trump on new evidence from doj whistleblowers the fbi did target parents last year with counter terrorism tactics at the suggestion of the attorney general of the united states. what is that about? and the state of florida is going into a conservative powerhouse some feel, democrats are launching a big effort to turn the sunshine state blue. lieutenant governor nunez responds to that, busy three hours, kicks off about eight minutes from now on the channel you trust for morning news. todd and carley, pack in a couple, you are watching "fox and friends first," we'll see you shortly. ubrelvy helps u fight migraine attacks. u put it all on the line. u do it all. so u bring ubrelvy. it can quickly stop migraine in its tracks within 2 hours... without worrying if it's too late or where you are. unlike older medicines, ubrelvy is a pill that directly blocks a protein believed to be a cause of migraine. do not take with strong cyp3a4 inhibitors. most common side effects were nausea and tiredness. migraine pain relief starts with u. learn

. >> carley: less than a year ago merrick garland insisted parents were not being targeted by the doj. you may remember this. >> i can't imagine any circumstance in which the patriot act would be used on the circumstances of parents complaining about their children. >> todd: we have three parents here to respond to the whistle-blowing bombshell that is challenging merrick garland. stay with us. - look, this isn't my first rodeo, and let me tell you something. i wouldn't be here, if i thought reverse mortgages took advantage of any american senior or worse, that it was some way to take your home. it's just a loan designed for older homeowners and it's helped over a million americans. a reverse mortgage loan isn't some kind of trick to take your home. it's a loan, like any other. big difference is, how you pay it back. - find out how reverse mortgages really work with aag's free, no obligation, reverse mortgage guide. eliminate monthly mortgage payments, pay bills, medical costs, and more. call now and get your free info kit. - other mortgages are paid each month, but with a reverse mor

whistleblower doj used counter-terrorism tools against parents in response to school board memo. but, lara, remember when merrick garland said that wasn't happening? watch. >> i can't imagine any circumstance in which the patriot act would be used in the circumstances of parents complaining about their children nor can i imagine a circumstance where they would be labeled as domestic terrorism. >> todd: lara, which is it, did garland lie under oath or does he have no idea what's happening under his doj? >> yeah. i mean, it's a great question, todd. i think either way, wow, that does not bode very well for our attorney general of the united states. we all knew something was happening. we all heard about this. it has now been confirmed that, indeed, you know, they were using government resources to target parents and the goal was very clear. it was to shut down speech for parents in america. parents that were very concerned about what their children were learning in school. you are right, todd, the fact that our attorney general does not either didn't know about it or lied to congre

the doj is investigating they attack as a hate crime and racially motivated extremism. he is due back in court thursday. president biden reacting to the shooting yesterday, listen. >> a lone gunman armed with weapons of war shot and killed ten innocent people in cold blood at a grocery store on saturday afternoon. we must all work together to address the hate that remains a stain on the soul of americans. >> ashley: we are learning more about the victims of the shooting. killed a retired police officer aaron salter jr., working as a security at the store but his body armor blocked the bullets. he is hailed an hero. but the buffalo police, president biden will visit buffalo after speaking to the new york governor in the city's mayor over the weekend. actually, todd. >> todd: jackie, thank you. congressman says there are important questions that need to be answered about the buffalo/suspect before politics gets in the way. >> the man has committed one of the most heinous acts our country has ever seen. we all understand that. we need to get down to the facts. what was dri

so, the doj needs to investigate. congress is not going to let this go by. the republicans in both the house and the senate. judiciary we will continue to investigate. i believe the crews will prevail. this is a crime the criminal should be held accountable. >> carley: let's hope that justice does prevail, thank you for joining us. >> thank you for having me. >> carley: the repairman who blew the whistle on hunter biden's laptop is suing house intelligence committee chair adam schiff with a full media outlet defamation. john paul mac isaac is suing cnn politico and "the daily beast." he is seeking $1 million in damages. john paul mac isaac said adam schiff and media outlet falsely accused him of spreading russian disinformation which cost him his story. he will be joining us later this morning to discuss this. you don't want to miss that. >> joey: amber heard in the defamation case against her and the actress with johnny depp said he would get violent when he abuse drugs and alcohol. the first time she claims that johnny depp struck her, listen. >> i didn't

lawmakers say they have proof from the doj whistleblowers that the fbi did target protesting parents using counter terror tactics. this all began last september when the national school board's association sent a letter covid protesting to domestic terrorists. >> i can't imagine any circumstance from which the patriot act would be used in the circumstances of parents complaining about their children nor can i imagine a circumstance where they would be labeled as domestic terrorism. >> fox news contributor lara trump joins us now. good morning to you, lara. >> good morning, ainsley. >> ainsley: good morning. this is all coming out now. there are two republican congressman jim jordan and mike johnson they say they have proof of this. they say that they found that there was a snitch line for tips about parents at school board meetings and they give different examples which i can go through in a minute what's your response to this? >> this is totally outrageous. we all knew something was going on with this. we heard about this. and people felt like there was an effort out there to silenc

where is the doj? here is ian. >> it has the potential for not only danger, you are putting supreme court justices at their residences, their neighbors who have to deal with this. but you are also looking at people who that are trying to influence a decision of what is supposed to be an independent branch of the united states government. if you want to go influence policy, go to congress. it's appalling that the department of justice would rather go investigate a parent that shows up at a school board meeting and says we're coming for you as in we're going to knock you out of a job at the next election but does nothing when people try and influence decisions before the court. >> steve: so ian said that it was all about essentially the administration does not want to anger their base and go after the protesters, even though they are breaking the law in some cases. >> brian: very simple. do you have any emergency tape? do you have a cone? you back them up to a certain area. go meet in the major park, the

the doj hate crime racially motivated extremism. he wonder went a mental evaluation after making similar threats last year. the suspect is on suicide watch and he planned saturday's attack months in advance. buffalo releasing the names of all 10 victims among them a retired police officer who was working as a guard is at the star. hailed as hero for attempting to stop the buffalo shooter. >> one of the individuals inside the star is a bee loved security guard retired. hero in our eyes. engaged the suspect. fired multiple shots. struck the suspect because he had heavily armored plating on that bullet had no round. the suspect engaged our retired officer and he was ultimately shot and deceased at the scene. >> president biden and the first lady will visit buffalo tomorrow in response to saturday's shooting. back to you. >> pete: thank you, todd. >> ainsley: oldest victim was ruth whitfield substitute teacher. she had gone to visit her husband in the nursing home she was his caretaker. she is the matriarch of our family and raised four

so that stuff still falls under the doj test. >> ainsley: the bottom line is we don't trust the government to handle what we are going to see, what news is going to be out there based on the past. if they had done things the right way in the past then we could have trusted them. why are they getting involved in this. we do have intelligence officers that are monitoring things that are online. >> steve: one of the things he said we're not the opinion police. but, so it's not about opinions. but when you say that laptop is from russia, it's russian disinformation. that is not an opinion. that is the department of homeland security has said that thing is from russia. >> pete: you are exactly right. the same as saying cnn. when they say we north opinion. we are just news. we are only telling you this news over here. >> steve: and that's our opinion. >> pete: and the process is clear as day. he mentioned bret baier, you asked a question about nina jankovicz who will be charged with leading this 30-something georgetown graduate has done work on disinformation from one side of the aisle. there is

association letter, you'll remember, this was a letter that the national school board association sent to the doj, asking parents be classified as domestic terrorists for showing up at school board meetings and protesting their children's education. ok. it's important to remember here. the white house, we now know, helped craft that letter. they helped craft the school board -- >> brian: told them to draft it. >> will: and what did the original version ask for, the following. we ask the army national guard and military police be deployed to certain school districts and where they have been subjected to acts of threats of violence. to be clear, this is the biden administration helping draft a letter for the national school board association to ask the biden administration to deploy the military on parents. >> ainsley: and the national school board association later apologized, remember, they got caught. not only calling you the parent a domestic terrorist, they want to send in military police so make sure you don't have a say in the child's school board meetings, they want to control the school bo

the republicans are calling for the doj to investigate and charge this person if applicable. >> ainsley: i wish -- to your point i wish the nine justices would have had a press conference yesterday and stood together. >> steve: we're all together. >> ainsley: we're not going to allow this to happen anymore. we will put security efforts in place. the obamas said a blow to women and free society. kamala was at that event last night. assaults on freedom. roe opponents want to punish women. elizabeth warren joined the protesters outside the supreme court. i'm angry, we are not going back. joe biden was asked about this from reporters at joint base andrews. here he is. >> the idea that we're going to make a judgment that is going to say that no one can make the judgment to abort a child based on a decision by the supreme court i think goes way overboard. >> brian: that's joe biden yesterday. word is, bret baier was indicating that maybe joe biden knew this was coming. might have heard about it on friday that the brief was written in february. the oral arguments were in december. and then all

bombing at a pro-life organization has some asking why the attack isn't considered terrorism by the doj. senator ron johnson says this is the very definition of domestic violence extremism. he is next. >>> plus, get back to work. we're going to share elon musk's warning as americans hope to keep up with china. vivek ramaswamy reacts. a fast walker. thanks, gary. and for unexpected heartburn... frank is a fan of pepcid. it works in minutes. nexium 24 hour and prilosec otc can take one to four days to fully work. pep- [narrator] it'sf fa mixed up world. and the way we work looks a little different. but whether you embrace the new normal or just want to get back to the routines that feel right, x-chair continues to be at the forefront of change, which is why we've launched the all new x-chair with elemax. elemax combines gentle body temperature regulation with stress melting massage to increase your comfort working from home or at the office. feel more refreshed in seconds with dual fans that actively deliver a clean air flow or you can wrap your back in the soothing warmth of heat therapy

we turn now to your headlines starting with the border crisis, the doj will appeal the judge's decision to block the biden administration fermenting title 42. this after a judge ruled in favor of a lawsuit, to doesn't republicans say, to keep it in place. the public health order was set to end monday but the federal judge said the cdc should have allowed public comment on title 42's termination before finalizing it. the cdc is issuing a health alert as the who calls an emergency meeting for monkeypox, the cdc telling doctors to be vigilant for cases. this comes as europe confirms 100 infections of the disease, in the us, 6 people in america possible monkeypox in functions. one cases been confirmed in massachusetts, help officials are investigating a possible case in new york city. no relief for the pain at the pump, gas prices at a record high, the national average price has not increased since yesterday. the price still sitting at $4.59. the price at fresh records for 11 consecutive days until today. aaa calling the streak of record highs unprecedented. foxbusiness's making money's cha

now, doj should -- instead of focusing on parents that show up at a school board meeting -- they should be out here communicating to these protesters saying get off these streets, get away from these homes, peaceful protest is to be conducted in the public square, not in front of someone's front door, not disrupting their whole community. carley: senator, democrats believe that the abortion issue is a winning issue for them. but then you see the fire bombing of a wisconsin pro-life center and supreme court justices in hiding as people are protesting in front of their homes. i do think that a lot of people look at that, and they think it's extreme. are democrats miscalculating that situation? >> they are miscalculating. i was talking to an independent-minded, democrat-leaning voter yesterday, and they were all upset about this at first. and then they found out that it was not a ban on abortion. then they found out that the democrats were trying to make this all about allowing late term abortion any place, anytime, anywhere in every single state, and they said wait a minute, this isn't ab