just department, work with me. now the justice department has to come up with something and submit it to the judge by next thursday. >> i was wondering about that. thank you. please stand by. i want to bring back in cnn senior legal analyst, elie honig, and former fbi deputy assistant director, peter strzok. the judge is skeptical that the entire affidavit needs to be sealed. >> i'm skeptical of that, because doj said, in its initial brief, the possibility of redactions is not going to work here, judge, they said in their brief, because if they have to redact out the valuable investigative information, we're going to give you a bunch of gibberish. virtually everything of meaning -- >> every paragraph will be blacked out. >> all we'll see is "the, and, but." i've done these affidavits. i know peter strzok has done these affidavits. everything in there, virtually everything in there, other than the absolute meaningless formalities is important to your investigation. otherwise, you couldn't wouldn't put it in there in

there is every incentive for the department to do it right. so, you know, i think it is sort of wrong about six different ways. >> harry lippman, juliet cayenne, thank you for staying with us. >> thank you. >> in the meantime, we'll take a short. break when we come back, we'll have a lot more on the u.s. response to all trump's special master request to seize evidence -- mar-a-lago by the fbi. late breaking story, on cnn, live, 29 minutes past the hour. i typed in grandma's name and birth year... and there she was, working at the five and dime. my dad's been wondering about his childhooaddress for 70 years... and i found it in five minutes. ...that little leaf helped me learn all the names from the old neighborhood... it felt like a treasure hunt. the 1950 census adds vivid new detail to your family story. and it's available now on ancestry. your shipping manager left to “find themself.” leaving you lost. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description

, is right now working on a book about what's happening at the justice department. i thank you for that, sir. david, thanks for making time for joining us tonight. >> thank you. >> all right, that will do it for me for now, ali velshi is gonna be here tomorrow. but going anywhere, because right now it's time for the last word with lawrence o'donnell, good evening lawrence. good evening rachel and this is one of those days that we couldn't see coming. of course i know you were working on a completely different show than what you presented tonight. except for senator schumer who you had all along. but this is such a different night. this is the night this state in history of course when president richard nixon was forced to resign the office of the presidency because of the evidence of crimes that had been at that point discovered by investigators. and it's such a different political world in which tonight the top republican in the house of representatives kevin mccarthy threatens the attorney general of the united states. >> threatens the attorney general. >> kevin m

city departments. for clarity, i would like to differentiate mou's from internal to external. internal mou's include the department which are called inter departmental service agreements that may include additional documents that are covered under the comptroller's office for procedures and there is the internal agreement that involves non-city department, there are no mou's but could involve staff time and no internal mou's are brought before this commission. >> in regards to incoming funding, i would like to differentiate those between budgeted and unfunded. budgeted reviews are reviewed by this normal process. unbudgeted, and unanticipated funds are funds that were not included in the formal budget approval process. the city does have policies in place for approving the budget and funding. and awards in excess of $100,000 must be approved by the board of supervisors for the department to be able to utilize. now i will focus more on outgoing money. >> incoming funding agreement the commission often h

>> yes, the city for some mainly like enterprise departments and few general fund departments are fixed 2 year budget where you go thru the budget process once every 2 years and barring some large thresholds for changes or things like that but otherwise you dont need to go through every year and the 2 year budget holds you over. we evaluate every year for the next 2 years so called a rolling process so every budget we go through every year and we take a look what our needs are going to be over the next 2 years and work through that budget process and that budget is for 2 years and sets up a baseline for the second year, but that isn't set in stone because you are reevaluateing again the next year. every year you take a look at the next 2 years. obviously only one will be practically implemented because that is the first year and if you redo the process in the next year you look at the next 2 years. to your question about going forward, i are think what we have right now establishes the baseline what we are looking at. we are obviously have needs, everybody knows that so the baseline is

going forward. >> we're your department. we're here for you. we're you and that, and i really believe that san francisco really embodies that. i tell you, it was the greatest decision i ever made. i kept thinking, my gosh if i didn't play softball i wonder if i would have heard about it. it's funny you plan in life and gu to college and you plan your next steps, but the most profound decision nz life, is how you meet people are random. i was meant to be i think and it was such a great fit being that social worker with the ax, that's it. >> so i see san francisco and san francisco leadership and government as a beacon for the entire country. because we are so up front about what we believe in, we're really up front about inclusivity and i know that, others look at us, many look to us. we've had other departments, contact us in terms of how do you, how do you do this? how do you create a diverse equitable and inclusive workforce? and so, but i would be lying if i said that we don't have any problems in california or in san fra

the department's view is 5 findings are not met, yet, the department is not preventing mr. gallagher from creating a legal parking space somewhere else on the property? >> that's correct. >> has mr. gallagher been arc veiled of that. >> yes >> what does he do if we fiepdz it does not meet the 5 upon findings and the pel is denied what does mr. gallagher do to gain access to avail himself of that legal parking spot. >> propose a design for altering his building will to allow for parking in the buildable area of the lot. >> okay. so -- great. i'm happy with that answer and good information. thank you. hopeful low good information for the rest of the commission. >> thank you we will hear from dbi. good evening again. matthew green representing dbi i don't have much to add about the variance but active permits at this address and the notice of violation issued in june of 21. documents the existence of ad u installed without per mist and other violations and act of nov from october 2018 work without permit. dbi hope the permit would proceed with or without the parking so the ill

the fire department is a family. we live together, eat together, sleep in the same dorm together, go to crazy calls together, dangerous calls and we have to look out for one another. when i was burned in a fire years ago and i felt responsible, i felt awful. i didn't want to talk to any of my civilian friends. they couldn't understand what i was going through. the firefighters knew, they understood. they had been there. it is a different relationship. we have to rely on one another. in terms of me being the chief of the department, i am really trying to maintain an open relationship with all of our members in the field so myself and my deputy chiefs, one of the priorities i had was for each of us to go around to different fire stations to make sure we hit all within the first three or four months to start a conversation. that hasn't been there for a while. part of the reason that i am getting along well with the field now is because i was there. i worked there. people know me and because i know what we need. i know w

the health department, really. the police in that road all the time when sometime ago the police are ready made a statement, very strong statement, and pointed out to real policing that they should be doing. and we have all the teams, the silver and the gold team and i don't know what other team. some response teams. we have that even with our fire department. we have to do a needs assessment on all these teams. and we have to fine tune the police department. they do real policing. many, all of them have some training, but when it comes to mental issues and we get all of these people on the street screaming and shouting, going in and tearing the place apart. >> thank you, caller. >> good evening, caller. you have two minutes. >> public speaker: yes, hi. this is ms. brown again. we are talking about community policing, but i was just going back to again, i have not heard from my investigator. if he's going to be out on injury, you should have someone else assigned to give me a call and let me know something. that's

between the department. this is how we started high level and how we saw different ways of being this look at and why we made the recommendation we did. contracts, you just heard from alex about it a little bit. and over the next four to six weeks we're going to try and make contract machines out of you. as i think commissioner simi alluded to, this is a dense and complex topic and we're going to try and educate you and arm you with all the information necessary so you feel both comfortable and confident approving contracts and delegating some approvals to the department. so, when the staff department formed on october 1st, it will not have the authority to approve its own contract awards or modifications because you have that authority. so, the public works commission assumes responsibility for contract approvals on september 1st although there are no operations, contracts or otherwise in the queue that would go to the public works commission at that time. so, through the end of august, the city administrat

officials today john bolton, a long-time harsh critic of iran justice department officials say this man, shahram was behind an attempt to kill him. they say he's behind iran's revolutionary force. he's facing murder charges as of now he's overseas not in u.s. custody with very little chance he'll ever be caught. he allegedly reached out to someone he met over social media. he asked that person to take photos of john bolton for a book he was writing that person put him in touch with somebody else who they said could take the photos, but that person turned out to be an fbi informant. eventually he allegedly offered the informant $300,000 to help him eliminate john bolton, $50,000 for the ininformant and $250,000 for anybody they hired to actually do the job officials say he event sent a photo of what appeared to be stacks of cash and told the inform want the money was for the next job he had lined up for him. cnbc washington correspondent eamon javers now >> he joked he's embarrassed how low the price for his head wus was, but in all seriousness he says he's concerned the iranians are

what is the department of justice doing? >> they told you what they were doing, yasmin, they just haven't told you how they're doing it. they have an ongoing investigation, which is why large portions of the affidavit have been redacted. they have numerous witnesses that they are talking to and protecting, which is completely appropriate. remember, search warrants come at the beginning of investigations or sort of the early middle, and not typically at the very end. so we don't know precisely what they're doing or how they're doing it, nor are we entitled to know that, but we know they're still doing it. i think charles made a really interesting and important point by noting what's missing from the attorney's letter. but there's something else i would add to that. the three statutes that the government relied upon to get the search warrant don't require that the information that's mishandled or destroyed be classified information at all. so we can debate, you know, all day if you'd like, yasmin, whether or not the president

the department of justice is asking him not to do it. interestingly donald trump, who said on his social media site that he also wanted the affidavit released, is not making a formal request for it. one of his lawyers is in the courtroom today, but just to watch. team trump isn't arguing or filing anything. so how will judge reinhart rule? if fast is precedent, it is almost certain he will side with the d.o.j. and keep the affidavit under seal. and all, d.o.j. is arguing releasing it would do grave damage to their investigation. but here's the thing, there really isn't a lot of specific precedent here. a former president of the united states has never had their home searched by the fbi. a former president of the united states has never taken classified materials home and then not given them back. a former president of the united states has then never gone on to publicly attack the fbi and the d.o.j., putting the departments and the individual law enforcement officers and officials who work there in grave personal danger. that is to say t

district were on patrol in a marked department vehicle. officer number one is a officer in the field training program while officer number two is his field training officer. the two officers observed a subject pushing a red bicycle while riding a blue bicycle on the sidewalk. officer number two recalled the recent crime alert regarding a stolen bicycle from the area. crime alerts are bulletins dissiminated to san francisco police department members by investigative units to provide information regarding recent crimes. officer number one, the passenger in the patrol vehicle advised department of emergency management dispatch they were in the area of south van ness and 16 street where they saw a 917 which is supicious person riding a blue bicycle with a red bicycle in his hand. the two officers attempted to contact the subject later identified as jose (inaudible) ibin the area of shotwell and 18th street. body worn camera footage for both officer number one and officer number two began while they were driving eastbound on 18th street and the

justice department has to do their jobs. but at the same time, i know in minnesota, what people are talking about at the cafes. they're looking at the gas prices which, by the way, have gone down every single day for nearly two months. they're looking at the fact that finally we have been willing to take on the pharmaceutical companies. that we're going to start making semiconductor chips in america today that we need for everything from our cell phones to our cars. they're still talking about ukraine and the fact that we got 99 to 1 the president was able to push through the treaty that allows finland and sweden, matters in minnesota, to be part of nato. they're talking about standing with our veterans when we have got those horrible issues of so many of them getting sick and by being located next to burn pits and how the republicans messed around with that. we have a lot of things to talk about politically as we go into midterms where we are delivering for people, and have people's backs. and so that is what i believe is t

. were reporting information to thejustice department. i suspect that in the material redacted from the affidavit. could you explain to us why all of this is taking place? at the heart of this is classified information and how it was handled by president trump. that's right, that is at the heart of this. although the particular federal laws that the justice department particular federal laws that thejustice department is claiming may have been violated don't necessarily require the information to be classified. basically if you have a record and the government wants it back, you have to give it back. that said, there is no question that the material stored does seem to implicate many of america's greatest secrets, covert intelligence sources, reports we have got from surveillance, things of that nature, which goes a long way to explaining why the justice department made it to explaining why thejustice department made it a priority to get a search warrant and get this stuff back.— this stuff back. there was hesitation in _ this stuff bac

to formally establish the department of early childhood, as you know this department for posed and formed through the budget process last year to hurj the office of early care and education with the first 5 commission. this new department will be tasked with having a unified vision,ition mission, strategy and outcome framework to serve the youngest residents 0-to 5 and families. san francisco has made monumental strides advancing our goals for universal early care and education, especially in the passage of the early education for all initiative known as baby prop c to bring dedicated to dollars to clear long waiting list, uplift wages for the dedicated educators and build a lasting infrastructure hope some day means every young child will have access without the family having to jump through hoops and waiting for years sometimes for their child to get a slot. we need to make sure that this funding fulfills the initant of voters. the first 5 commission through state funding also plays a crucial role in supporting families of young children through parentsing courses, family resource cente

department, single story. constructed in 1924, it is a potential historic resource. the permit is to construct a new accessory dwelling unit on the ground floor, repair existing decks and stairs at the rear and replace windows at the front and back of the property. no expansion is proposed. the appellant is the neighbor to the east, the concern is about excavation associated with the extension and the enlargement of the building. as previously mentioned, there is no expansion of the building. in 2015, when it was originally filed, there was an expansion proposed. the appellant did file a dr and it was heard by the planning commission in 2018 and the planning commission voted 5-0 and requested this be reduced by 15 feet. this was approved by the planning department january 24, 2019 and the permit was never issued. in 2022, when the owner was interested in reducing the scope, the planning department worked with the homeowner on the permit application and revise the plan. and the dwelling unit on the first and se

advice the department of police accountability and advice the sheriff department. i do a few other thing s but those are the highlights of what i do, and what that means is, i'm available to all those departments to answer any questions that come up related to your work and that includes you all of course. you all have my contact information and you can all feel free to contact me by e-mail or phone any time you have a question that comes up as we progress and we all learn because this is a brand new body so i'm learning along with you the ins and outs of this body. guided by the charter. basically i thought it would be a good idea to go through generally what boards and commissions, what their authority is in general and some of the restrictions on boards and commissions and individual members. i will probably keep calling you commissioners but think you are technically all members and don't think there is a real distinction in the law but forgive me if i call you a commissioner and you are not. starting with the charter, section 4.102 speaks generally to the powe

the department did not make any public statements on the day of the search. the former president publicly confirmed the search that evening as is his right. the department filed a motion to make public the warrant and receipt in light of the former president's public confirmation of the search. the surrounding circumstances and the substantial public interest in this matter. >> the justice department has filed a motion to unseal the search warrant for donald trump's home. for the past few days, trump allies and republicans on capitol hill have been clamoring for the attorney to explain himself, come out, and explain this fbi search of the former president's home. until merrick garland basically said, okay. fine. you want answers? i'll show you the warrant. attorney general garland also confirmed today that he personally signed off on the search. of trump's home. prior to it happening. and he made a point of calling out the attacks on federal law enforcement that have been emanating from the political right, ever since this search became public. >> let me addr

we are going to cover the big news out of the justice department as well. the attorney general merrick garland announcing today that he's moving to unseal the warrant to search trump's home. but we start tonight with a truly gobsmacking new report from the "washington post." here's the headline. fbi searched trump's home to look for nuclear documents and other items, sources say. quote, classified documents relating to nuclear weapons were found among the items that fbi agents sought in a search of the former president donald trump's florida residence on monday, according to people familiar with the investigation. experts in classified information said the unusual search underscores deep concern among government officials about the types of information they thought could be located at trump's mar-a-lago club, and potentially in danger of falling into the wrong hands. one former justice department official, who in the past oversaw investigations of leaks of classified information, said the type of top secret information described by the people familiar with

department of justice. it was very early on, it was may 2017 so you think about that for a second, trump was inaugurated at the end of january, this was less than four months later, in may of that year, less than four months into his presidency, we learned in "the new york times" that during the trump transition, a person who may have been considering for the job of national security adviser, not just somebody to be a national security adviser to the new president but literally the national security adviser, a guy they had been considering for that job, according to the times, had notified the trump transition team thats there there was a big problem with him potentially being appointed national security adviser. a very serious problem this. guy who was being considered as national security adviser, he told the trump transition, hey, you know what, i feel like i ought to let you know, i'm under active federal investigation as a potentially unregistered agent of a foreign power. full stop right there. right?

but i trust the justice department to move forward. again, this is a consequential investigation and it has to be done t right way, not just in a way in which the public, who has got all of their news at their fingertips and once the news yesterday, deman. they have to do it the right way. judy: you are right that the general impression up until now is that this is a justice department that is independent and played its cards very close to the vest. we have learned very little. you know have republicans in particular looking at is and saying here you go, the justice department, the justice system, in the words of house minority leader kevin mccarthy, have been weaponized to go after president trump. how do they disabuse critics of that being the case? mr. jones: they will do that eventually with facts that will come out in this case, if it is the case. i believe the facts will merit what happened. what is interesting, it is the same republicans who for the last few months during the january 6 committee investigation have ignored all of

many were taken on directly by the department of justice. in fact with kmart yesterday was a direct result of his efforts to get a special master to reveal the documents -- to review the documents, and as a result, more incriminating information has come up. we know what the markings mean. the question about whether their removal was improper or whether the efforts to get them back where obstructed or impeded in some way, will be what the doj has to figure out in deciding with her to pursue a criminal case. kristen: when will the decision be made on whether a special master will be appointed? rick: the judge in the case already said she is inclined to grant the motion for a special master, it -- this is an attempt by the department of justice to say, we don't need it, that some of these documents appeared to be intermixed with things like trump's passport, one of which was retired. they are saying, we donate a special master, it would impede the pace of the investigation. everything would need to be put on pause. that before the justice depa

on a book on what is happening at the justice department. david, thanks for making time to join us tonight. >> thank you. >> that is going to do it for me tomorrow. ali velshi will be here tomorrow. "way too early" with jonathan lemire is up next. >>> the fbi searches the florida home of former president trump. looking for documents from his time in the white house. and this morning, we're learning more about what agents found at mar-a-lago. the search has republicans rallying around the former president. house minority leader kevin mccarthy is even threatening an investigation of the department of justice. and online, some of trump's most devoted followers are furious and posting concerning calls for action.

besides delaying the proceedings, will that hurt the department of justice? or, couldn't put him in a better position that, trump can't complain anymore? >> it's a thoughtful question, stephanie, it could help in the following away. if folks don't trust the department to handle this filtration process internally, which is how we normally do it, and appointing a special master, perhaps a retired federal judge as a neutral third party, gives you that imprimatur of neutrality. so one way or the other the department of justice and the fbi will get the fruits of the search they will get the evidence to use. even though it'll slowed down a bit, and seems unnecessary to me, doing that through a special master, a neutral third party, to your point, might give trump modulus to rail about, although he never seems to be at a loss to find something to real about. >> and he hasn't been a law at a loss over the last 24 hours. he's obviously not on facebook or twitter, he's banned from those platforms, at least for now but he is on his own self appointed social media site.

jeff clark with another department of justice department lawyer, ken kasky. and the letter was to be sent to the leadership of the georgia state legislature. other portions of the legislature that were intended for other states. neither mr. drug nor mr. klulowski had any evidence of widespread electorate and flawed, but they were quite aware of what mr. trump wanted the department to do. jeff clarke met privately with president trump and others in the white house and agreed to assist the president without telling the senior leadership of the department who oversaw him. as you will see, this letter claims that the u.s. department of investigations have, quote, intended fight significant concerns that may have impacted the outcome of the election in multiple states, including the state of georgia. in fact, donald trump knew this was a lie there. department of justice had already informed at the president of the united states repeatedly that is investigations had found no fraud serviceman to overturn the results of the 2020 election. the letter also said this, q

, . ., ., department? so i'll be clear on this, in may — department? so i'll be clear on this, in may 2017 _ department? so i'll be clear on this, in may 2017 when - department? so i'll be clear on this, in may 2017 when donald | department? so i'll be clear on - this, in may 2017 when donald trump, that then president, fired jim this, in may 2017 when donald trump, that then president, firedjim komi, the director of the fbi, and rightfully so, because i think he lost his way and the fbi developed into a culture of being weaponised. ——james comey. into a culture of being weaponised. —— james comey. the into a culture of being weaponised. ——james comey. the mistake into a culture of being weaponised. —— james comey. the mistake which was not calculated by then president donald trump, not only should he have fired james comey, but everybody else within his executive staff. unfortunately that culture has continued to permeate since 2017, and i think we have seen examples time and time again with respect to the fbi getting involved in cases

report from chief of department jeanine nicholson on current issues and activees in the department since the last meeting on july 27, 2022 including budget, academy, special events, communications and outreach to other government agencies and the public. report from operations deputy chief robert postel on overall field operations emergency medical services and bureau of fire prevention and investigation, training within the department and the airport division and report from administration deputy chief tom o'connor on the administrative division fleet and facilities status and updates finance support services and homeland security. >> may i begin? thank you from the feinstein again. chief jeanine nicholson and this is my report since our -- since last month's meeting. i building i missed the last meeting so yesterday was a busy day for our members. you may have seen in the news and i want to thank all members that respond to both incidents and really just -- they really just worked hard and did a great job and the chief can answer questions about the mccallister fire if you have any and

he's at the department of justice. i understand you have a development for us. >> reporter: that's right. i mean, we obviously know that there's been a number of threats made against fbi employees as a result of the -- the search that happened. and so the fbi director sent a message earlier today to employees to sort of reassure them that, you know, he is standing by them and maintains their trust. i'll read a part of it. he says there's been a lot of commentary about the fbi this week questioning our work and our motive. much of it is from critics and pundits on the outside who don't know what we know and don't see what we do, what i know and see is an organization made up of men and women who are committed to doing their jobs professionally and by the book every day. this is no exception. he goes on to talk about his pride in the work that the agents are doing and really it's not really a commentary on the -- the search that happened at mar-a-lago today, rather this week, but more of a commentary on the state of thin

it is something that the department takes seriously. and as for this source, i'm sure that they're concerned about potential reprisals and, you know, i think they should be concerned about that. obviously not violence or something like that, but they could be concerned about their employment and their future. >> "the wall street journal" reporting overnight also includes reporting that the boxes that were retrieved of documents from mar-a-lago on monday are still at the fbi field office down in miami. can you explain, you know, what happens to them now, where they go, who sifts through them? >> well, they're likely in evidence right now. there is a chain of custody that is respected and because they're not only classified documents, okay. so they are held in an area that is secure. but they are also evidence in a criminal investigation. the fact that a search warrant was executed indicates there is a criminal investigation and that there were potential charges that were presented before a judge and probable cause and so forth. so right

i reached out to the sandra fell police department and they provided this statement. we would like to apologize to the city and county of san francisco, specifically the neighborhood where we dropped off this man. we would also like to apologize to the first responders, police and fire department who had to deal with this person after we left the sandra fell. police department does not have a policy to take people to other jurisdictions and just leave them without any notification or approval. we're taking this incident seriously but are not allowed to comment further due to an ongoing personnel investigation. city attorney shoes says his office has dealt with a similar issue in the past number of years ago, our office filed a lawsuit against the state of nevada for improperly bus. same secchia trick patients to san francisco. he says they'll continue to look into this incident and may file charges as well. >> at the very least he wants other agencies to know san francisco won't tolerate things like this. any jurisdiction that's thinking of doing something similar to

it sends a message that there are members of the department the police department, sheriff's department, fire department that are just like the people that we encounter in san francisco. and i think it sends a message of hope the more we honor the lbgtq community now, the stronger we can be in standing up against those that don't want our representation. [crowd noise] [music] >> [speaking spanish] [speaking spanish]. [crowd noise] [music] [music] [drums] [crowd noise] this is my first time at the san francisco pride even though i have been here a couple years, i felt like now was the time to go. um -- really just coming to show my support and love for the whole community out here. um, i'm really excited to be here today. >> i think i am most excited be such an arc mazing community come together. just the love and support i think that especially in san francisco, um, people bring together it is this such a deep feeling. and i'm excited feel that today. [crowd noise] [music] [music] [sirens] [music] [crowd noise] whoa! [music] [cars honking] [sirens] [music] [horns] we never been to a par

it was officials within the archives who contacted department of expressing concern. the department of justice took on an investigation which is led to a search of m-a-lago. >> it is an unusual case. has this ever happened before? >> federal laws have been applied to people in lesser positions in this affidavit. the justice department describes three different possible federal laws that might have been violated. it escalates a level of importance. one of them criminalized the removal of government documents, and carries a potential penalty of years in prison, and then there is a law that basically criminalizes an unauthorized use of defense of national security information, that carries a penalty of 10 years imprisonment. also, an affidavit of a federal law that criminalizes the concealing of documents for the purpose of obstructing an investigation. that carries 20 years of imprisonment. some of these statutes that i mentioned of removal have been applied to minor for goals -- figures inhe government. misappropriate or exited office by taking some doments within. but

district were on patrol in a marked department vehicle. officer number one is a officer in the field training program while officer number two is his field training officer. the two officers observed a subject pushing a red bicycle while riding a blue bicycle on the sidewalk. officer number two recalled the recent crime alert regarding a stolen bicycle from the area. crime alerts are bulletins dissiminated to san francisco police department members by investigative units to provide information regarding recent crimes. officer number one, the passenger in the patrol vehicle advised department of emergency management dispatch they were in the area of south van ness and 16 street where they saw a 917 which is supicious person riding a blue bicycle with a red bicycle in his hand. the two officers attempted to contact the subject later identified as jose (inaudible) ibin the area of shotwell and 18th street. body worn camera footage for both officer number one and officer number two began while they were driving eastbound on 18th street and the

planning department staff francis mcmillan. i will provide a brief update on the strategies and lgbtqia culture and historical society. the department involvement in the tenderloin >> the development of the community action plan supports the well-being and the standard transgender cultural district and updating the priorities and community action plan such as increased tree planting, sidewalk gardening and planting and enhancing economic opportunities along key corridor and recognizing historic landmarks in the tenderloin and place making projects. aligning with well-being goals engaging with the district include the strategies pilar of the culture and the aspect of supporting the cultural districts and lgbtqia+cultural districts and the implementation of the cultural history and economic building strategies. planning has finished with programs and current initiatives being developed by the designation team. the multiyear effort to survey the city's neighborhoods and identify the document to cultures that are important to san f

the health department, really. the police in that road all the time when sometime ago the police are ready made a statement, very strong statement, and pointed out to real policing that they should be doing. and we have all the teams, the silver and the gold team and i don't know what other team. some response teams. we have that even with our fire department. we have to do a needs assessment on all these teams. and we have to fine tune the police department. they do real policing. many, all of them have some training, but when it comes to mental issues and we get all of these people on the street screaming and shouting, going in and tearing the place apart. >> thank you, caller. >> good evening, caller. you have two minutes. >> public speaker: yes, hi. this is ms. brown again. we are talking about community policing, but i was just going back to again, i have not heard from my investigator. if he's going to be out on injury, you should have someone else assigned to give me a call and let me know something. that's

but i think the justice department is more right. they have an ongoing criminal investigation and want to protect it and witnesses from harm. judges get paid to weigh these competing interests. my guess to your question is we're going to see nothing or very little. meaning that the judge will likely side with the justice department and keep the affidavit under seal, or if he unseals it, given the great public interest in its contents, i expect it would be heavily redacted. there is a preference in the law, when possible, because courts operate in a public space, to make information available to the public. that makes sense. but not here where there is a more compelling interest in keeping the affidavit sealed for now while the investigation is ongoing. >> joyce, all this happening in florida and new york, there's the weisselberg case, and other problems for former president trump, including "the new york times" is reporting the january 6 congressional committee has subpoenaed trump white house documents. >> well, that's, i think, ano