and the principles and i'll go over what the mou does and a stipulation of the agreement and go over our planned budget for 2014-2015 to go over the solution kwurd or occurred in 2012 pursuant to 86 based upon the law that was in e the city acted through the cd as the assessor agency by as we know in june of 2012 a bit 1484 was passed is that they were separate entities from the city or the sponsoring city and the successor city and counties cities may retain the obligation to this was implemented through the ordinance 15 dash 12 the successor agency that created this commission and identified in terms of of the housing obligations what were the obligations it fell into two categories the health department and candle stick point and mission bay and the transbay project and then as well as our replacement housing we refer to by it's funding legislation what was sb 2113. so then again in november of that year we went through the due diligence progress funds and again based on the irrational law the assumes was all the housing assets will transfer to the city but dof invalidated that tr

so other features of the mou. just it allows us to dealing deal with angle letter other things that come up and most of the city staff will help with the desk services we don't have a receptionist to greet the public or accept the packages and time keeping and billing is important you heard the deputy director talk about this certain staff is allocated on how much on a mission bay project we'll need to be accurate in keeping time and make sure we can bill the appropriate funding source and again, it allows for an annual be budget so we'll clarify that language for the mou hates incorporated into ociis annual budget. you can see that has categories i've talked about the financial closing and the financial management services inclusionary or funded, limited exit program or certificate of preference and the receptionist services. i did want to point out while the certificate of preference services look low on the chart that represents the most cd supervisor times there's an ocii employee we cover 50 percent of that s

so other features of the mou. just it allows us to dealing deal with angle letter other things that come up and most of the city staff will help with the desk services we don't have a receptionist to greet the public or accept the packages and time keeping and billing is important you heard the deputy director talk about this certain staff is allocated on how much on a mission bay project we'll need to be accurate in keeping time and make sure w

i want to say we're happy to see the mou taking shape it's been a year and a half since the ordinance is set up and 30 years the agency to take on functions when we were engaged in the quickly processed to get the ordinance passed we asked for this to get it semester for the agencies to get together there was some singtion we wanted to insist there was a process to capture that this moo mou is a closer to make sure how those agencies will work as efficiently as possible the real up shot is the staffing configurations have settled out nicely and ocii needs the manager in housedinitis it's going to help a lot there's a great expertise on staff you have a good balance with the expertise and shared responsibility that's helpful for us on the outside we have to make sure those agencies work well, for the housing organizations are moving through i want to give props to the staff work and support of mou. >> thanks. >> dr. espanola jackson. yes, i'm a little bit confused. dr. espanola jackson. when you listening to the mou i don't understand and also, they talked about the tax increments and

the first of these is the mou between ocii and the uc regents. the mou contains the terms under which ocii would release uc from certain obligations under the south plan, the opa and the pilot agreement. some of the key terms of the mou first, the affordable housing payment. this is a one-time lump-sum payment from ucsf to ocii of $10.2 million for the construction of affordable housing. ocii hired alh to conduct an independent analysis of the tax increment that would normally be generated by proposed development through 2023. alh's scope included a similar analysis and key assumptions used in the analysis and independent calculation of the estimated net present value or npv of the tax increment that would have been generated. the result of this analysis was an npv calculation of $39.8 million of total tax increment. the affordable housing payment is 25.6% of that total amount which exceeds the 20% ocii would receive if the property were developed by a taxable entity. next is the infrastructure payment. ucsf has agreed to make a one-time lump sum

look at package 8 of the certificate of preference program which is the attachment to the o to the mou it states that the certificates there are a variety of types but residential a or c certificates are valid until seven years after the completion of the project area like 2016 because i can't remember which project expired in 2005 but if this expires in 2008, i'm sorry. so basically that allows the agency commission to approve 5 year extensions to that project area >> no extensions. >> no extensions because nothing has expired yet. >> what happened if there's not used and expires and that's it. >> if no extensions then the program expired. >> whether or not we give them opportunities to apply or whether or not they used them. >> that's correct. >> with the affordable housing the above market rate those unite we have a marketing program for them from the developers and then once the project is over then their turned over to the maifgz; is that correct. >> for instance, if there were a for sale market rate project phase one in the shipyards and there are for sale inclusionary units that

is today is a new mou for the continued use of 1399 marin street. and they use this for general office warehouse storage, parking, repair of sfmta busses. and you'll notice that washing is stated in the use, it's not a current use and rich will work with sfmta to get approved. the reason this is before you today, the rents are all according to the commission approved parameter rents. we will continue to get rents. what we are requesting today is rather than our standard 5 year term, this would be a 7 year term. we are also asking for a waiver of the security deposit as this is another city department and typically the controller doesn't like us to hold huge amounts of funds between departments. we will be asking for our standard environmental deposits for any mitigation of bills or toxic problems that arise over the next 7 years. the estimated rent per year will be approximately $746,000 and that will increase 3 percent annually. we did bring this before the southern waterfront advisory committee and also as a benefit of this on going use, rents fro

now that we have one we would like to move our focus from getting an mou to implementation of that mou. with that, our recommendations are to identify time lines to expedite full implementation of the school sites. continued collaboration relationships with sfusd and stakeholders to include process to implementation, to commence training and collaboration with sf you'd. if there were trainings for actual documents we would like to see inclusion of language from do 71. i would like to thank the chief who is here today and everyone who worked with us on this priority and students who collaborated with us. we see this mou to improve community relationships within the city and establish relationships between the schools, departments and the community. i will be presenting no. 9. the police department has made huge strides in improving youth relations. they passed didgo 7.01 for interrogation. last year announced the police officers would be involved with the boys and girls club of america. that being said we recommend an implementation for training for all police officers for the stress on

it's in the mou, section 333, mitigation measures consistent with the fseir. page 16. >> thank you. it's been a week since i have read this one. so the concept is we are relying on the mission bay eir. ucsf has not done any additional ceqa for this project, unlike their campus or the hospital. so for the commission to be able to make findings through ceqa, you need to rely on a ceqa document and you need to rely on the mission bay document with the mitigated measures. in the future ceqa allows to you transfer out findings if they are found to be equal or better, basically. ucsf has requested -- they are in the process of doing a long range development plan eir. they are going to be looking at 33, 34 as well. and there is -- most of the mitigations that uc does in mission bay are pretty much the same or equivalent to what we do for the rest of the projects. both their original eir and the mission bay eir were completed. so the majority is similar. some like the transportation management plan where all of the private projects in mission bay are required to participate in the tma. uc h

and at&t has agreed to the mou they seem to recognize a public process but continues to submit only one location at that time, and we're not able to have the public robust discussion and this newly legislation will not allow proximity to schools. this is specifically considered in the legislation so i think that's worth noting f this may not be the best location >> why is that. >> i heard at the last hearing there's a lot of traffic and when kids are running down the streets there's obstructs we want to minimize the impact and try to effect the impediment as little as possible and that's another debate what's on the sidewalk, however, in the application from dpw i presume like all city agencies the application spells out exactly what has to be provided as part of the application. >> yeah. we have a check list an application check list. >> what does it say about alternative sites. >> i don't know if it specifically says alternative sites, however, i would state again that the s m f order and mou repeatedly referred to procedural locations and the hearing officer should be directed th

questions or comments i'd like to entertain a motion on this. >> i move we approve the mou. >> thank you very much. we are second >> seconded. >> mcallister call the roll. >> commissioner ellington. commissioner mondejar. commissioner singh. commissioner rosales. chairperson johnson. madam chair the vote is 5 i's. thank you very much can we recirculate the mou with the changes we've discussed thank you very much. next item, please. >> next order of business is 5 e authorized the lease between this third and mission associate, llc and california limited liability company a nonprofit benefit corporation consistent with the terms of the 1990 for the position of lent for the private property at the 680 mission street for the project and the resolution number 34, 2014 madam director. >> commissioners i'm sure you're aware of the former agencies and ociis work program. >> next speaker. >> in the yerba buena it is one we are approved the significant culture assets we continue to look at the culture institutions and yerba buena and this was an asset that was required for the urban renewable

so we won't have access to that money necessarily unless there is is an extension of that mou. but we should be planning and preparing ourselvess for it not to happen just to be on the safe side. so if that is at the discretion of this commission if it wants to give back allocated amount that is given to lafco or that the city and county and gives to lafco. under state statute once an estimate has been established the city and county or in this case the city and county of san francisco needs to give the exact same amount it gave in the previous year for the next year. they cannot reduce the lafco itself is the only body to reduce the amount. we have accepted the money and then realizing the budget issue that we give the money back. i know that you serve on the board of supervisors and you are well aware of budget for the city and county and it's up to you that we continue that practice for this final year. one of the things i was talking with miss miller about, maybe we keep some of the money this year and not return all of it. we tend to spend $100,000 to $120,000 overall payi

say the at&t applications were correctly did understand did at&t proposes any outcomes as attend by mou and in every case dealership alternative locations and dpw can't approve those without prior approval because they impact different residents than at&t's previous locations. i'd like to have the overlayed. i'll try to demonstrate how this might happen. you can see those cabinets have to be located in the infrastructure they listening to. if this is at&t's initial proposed location the thirty foot notification would effect this group of property owners, however, an alternative sites this is an entire group of neighborhood. the intent of the s m f was to show that the offset of the locations for a hundred and 20 days notice for the resident and presuming the population of neighborhoods will be aware and a more limited noticing of that. so in 4 of the cases before you today, we assert? the failure the process alternative locations were not presented and this nullifies this because there's not multiple locations. the altercating other situation is the location where at the outset has chos

and at&t has agreed to the mou they seem to recognize a public process but continues to submit only one location at that time, and we're not able to have the public robust discussion and this newly legislation will not allow proximity to schools. this is specifically considered in the legislation so i think that's worth noting f this may not be the best location >> hy

what we see as neighbors the box walk is a charade to provide information they've fulfilled the mou and didn't consider the neighborhood concerns the box is 40 cubic feet and numbering number two it's stages steel and can't be painted they have to have 3 hundred and 60 degrees walk around you can't put it up to a this so you can't fit there this into a plan but in alleys they'll be perfect for fortune are furniture because the limitation of the 3 hundred and material on the box and absolutely no flexibility in painting or putting murals on those boxes to make them fit into the neighborhood. that's my concerns in terms of of the community outreach is perceived by the neighbors that accelerates the objections >> thank you. next speaker. >> hi i'm jim. i'm also a past board member of the ace valley association i agree with the comments from the recent speaker at&t identifiable active to make those boxes more acceptable to the community. the mou said they were going to get additional community outreach basically, they go forward the intent by nonresponsive attempts to find workable solution

i am looking over the proposed mou and i see lots of language on local hiring, and prevailing wage and focused on the labor aspect of it, which is great. i think i see mission hiring hall present; that is fantastic. i don't want us to overlook the small minority and women businesses and i see a good-faith effort, but i'm always a little nervous when i hear "good-faith efforts." if something could explain that to me. >> i will have someone from the uc staff address that question for you. >> so daman lu is here to address your construction workforce program and then i can address some of the other programs that we have in place. >> great. >> hello commissioners i'm daman lu and it's my role to manage these programs at ucsf, including community workforce. ucsf as a state entity we are prohibited from mandating quotas and goals around local hire, but what we have done is voluntarily stepped in line with the city's program. actually partnered with mission hiring hall for the last three years in which they provide outreach and referral services to us. since we entered into the program in jan

. >> we're in the mou to pay for the officers time. my understanding this isn't simply at&t but common for publics to reimburse the city for all the costs with evaluating the permits but this is a whole schedule of fees that at&t is required to pay i'm sure the department can speak to >> mr. quan. >> evening john quan for the department of public works i've heard from the appellant that they do pay for the direct cost force the department i'll agree it didn't pay for the staff time the issue is trying to schedule a room at city hall in many cases that's been the challenge for the department we'll be working to get the additional time on monday in those kind of cases. i'm not hearing really is the continued point to the order itself that based on the order upon the objection we have a southern timetable to process the hearing. what the challenge we continue to face this is also, this is in context to their mou of memoranda of the understanding that when we do a posting there is a 20 day posting period and it would come in on the same da

i'm hoping that the trainings are successful as well as the mou. i think for the transitional age youth and commissioner wu or tong brought up the bridge funding that is critical. i know it's a lot of money, but i know it's until voters can pass the expansion of the children's fund that includes transitional age youth, there is that period of time that we need to ensure that people don't fall further through the cracks. i'm glad that you are looking at bridge funding. and i also want to say on city college maintaining our city college that the youth commission has been extremely bold in your leadership in seeing that that's a critical part of our city's economy workforce development for many many people and i think your leadership on urging the mayor and board of supervisors and the whole city to support that institution is really critical as well. but the structure that you have with your four committees and how you all integrate with so many issues is so really impressive as well. i'm really proud of our youth commission and thank you for helping

department sets a hearing on the objections that will schedule a box walk that's contemplated by the mou and meet with the objectors and attempt to identify alternative locations that we are prefer able to the community the delay does not come with the at&t it is for the department sets the hearings one hundred and 50 days after we notice that's the chocolate hold no, the process >> could you put the picture back on the orderly with regards to the location. >> i'll put the big one. >> can you show me specifically where this is the equipment bed has to be put. can you point out with a finger or pen when you did the box walk where is the equipment to go >> what the retinas proposed it at&t will put it's cabinet between the two buildings so where your finger is. >> that's correct. >> my next question to the public was somebody present during the box walk so could someone step forward from the public? i'm sorry. could you stadium again >> nick. >> were you present. >> i love the way he shows the picture he shows the back we're talking about the front there's not even a fence that's the bush

is relate to the constriction you know took action to approve the owner participation agreement the mou with sf with the property sale of the sales force property on blocks 33 and 94 to ucsf those are with the taxes agreement were any tax entities will have to pay the full tax prize i'm sure you're aware of there was an agreement that was paragraphed that provides i'm sure you're aware of to purchase the property and lift off the tax agreement and pay 29 point plus agreement and play ocii more than it's share that a normal taxing entity will receive we're going to get $10.2 million that's 25 percent or 5.6 percent more than we could otherwise get from the tax paying entity the board of supervisors wears two hats and the agency the commission gave it's content and the budget and finance committee considered last wednesday giving it's consent with its full approval the budget and finance decided to continue that item to tomorrow to the call of the chair. to budget and finance. and i even the article you've ruffled referred to is the examiner and the ocii staff including myself and christi

the eastern neighborhood it falls within 80 percent of the funds have to be used for priority in the mou. so that's sort major capital like the 16th street streetscape improvement we're preserving about 20 percent of the eastern neighborhood funds and among the remaining 20 percent it's a quarter and third for in kind agreements we're looking at in kind agreements as the capital project is this a capital project donates more or less benefit than other capital projects in this case we're really taking out of 0 pot where we don't have other projects identified yet >> because i think i mean they're good you get a project done that didn't necessarily take a lot of times money appropriated but i recall like lee street on ocean avenue was kind of a run of the mile street we used in kind agreement funds i don't know if it restraining order is to the level of the neighborhoods this one clearly does given what the developers have done and the response we've received from the community there's a slippery slope balance. >> sorry i want to mention we have two more in kind agreements in the eastern n

. >> then supervisors question the budget a that's in the mo h and mou for the services for various categories that's reflected here i don't see it. >> yes. it is. >> you thank you very much any other questions. commissioner ellington. the 2011 excess bonds are those restricted bonds >> those are pre2011 their subject to the indeferences the bonds covenants when we sold the bonds we promised they'll be used for broad purposes in the project areas so we're anticipating they will be used in those areas. for the broad purposes in the bonds and for the extent their tax exempt so those are irs restrictions on what you can spend them on we definitely don't want to get into a noncompliance area >> what are the areas. >> in the narrative of the budget i can find the package but there's in the south of market and bayview hunters point hunters point on page 40 of the actual budget narrative for the tax exempt that's the one-hundred 9 million so south of market and 4 hundred and 34 thousand in bayview hunters point. the

now with respect to the language in the mou that talks about coordination of hiring programs,, as well as making good-faith efforts to ensure minority and women-owned businesses have opportunities to compete for contracts with the regents. so in our advertising of contracting opportunities, particularly in the construction area, we ask bidders, if you will, to submit information about both the number of women, as well as minorities in their companies. and so that information is reported to as parts of their bid proposals and submittals. and those are taken into account. i do want to note also that the university has a diversity and outreach office that is headed by vice chancellor for diversity and out reach and that vice chancellor is responsible for not only ensuring that the university has a diverse workforce both in faculty and at staff-levels, but also doing outreach of types through our university partnership programs and other programs that work with the community at-large. so the university has, also, i think, as part of its responsibilities for reserve grants research grants w

eligible expenses up to $10 million for the ports expenses we are that hoping you recall there are an mou between the port and the america's cup committee we identified up to $10 million paid through the recognize. >> i want to say kudos to the staff and all the hard work to get such an incredible bond ratings it took a lot of effort we're lucky to have the staff and to have the kind of operation that warranted the high operation thank you all. >> i'm sorry, i hope i didn't mislead ii wasn't done with any executive director report. >> oh, sorry. >> that was my fault. the next part is to thrill about the park maintenance are doing out on the ports it you won't get to see it this but it's outstanding. so the port maintenance pile workers began to work on the thurnd system obtain april 21st consisting of one hundred and plus they support the wu could harms they keep the ships off the peers and because of the gangways and the short power system they have to sit off the pier a little bit throats process the department maintenance workers have the expertise to do this and they're doing a trimme

that completed an mou and that provides worker comp types of language for our students. i'm going to let darlene talk about additional parts of our summer programming. i thought it would be great if just to make it clear, we have other new programming coming on and i'm going to let darlene explain that. >> i'm darlene and we had a utility and building program and we're trying to launch it this summer. this program is -- the students stipend are funded -- we want to have 36 students to participate with the goal of 20 students per program. we're going to have two programs. this is going to mirror the dates and times. students who need credit recovery can take a credit recovery during the first period and they're eligible to complete the summer program and students will receive $600 for their participation in this program. we also have another program that john oconnell and this program is going to target 20 students and we expanded the student enrollment to include those for agriculture at john oconnell and ibd and a college at lincoln. this is a five week experience that

at the same meeting they also heard an item that's on today's calendar which is an mou with the san francisco municipal transportation agency and we'll be reporting on that later in our agenda. so we had a very good meeting with the southern waterfront advisory committee. >> thank you. apologies for the oversight. two saturdays from now -- actually, i'm sorry, this saturday, may 17 at 1:00 pm marks the 9th annual uncorked wine festival. the wine festival benefits save the bay, will be held from 1:00 to 6:00 pm at ghirardelli square and includes unlimited tasting and a souvenir wine glass. they will be presenting 50 top tier wineries and so if anyone is free on saturday head to ghirardelli square. on memorial day the san francisco maritime park association, the crew of the uss pump pumino will be hosting their annual lost boat ceremony. this is a ceremony where they honor their comrades and submarines lost at sea. the ceremony features 52 bell tolls lost at sea and on eternal patrol. the ceremony is. on the public and will take place may 26 at 10:00 am on pier 45. it's a wonderful event and if

we'll explain what mou away has to do with food and the nbc bay area booth and a possible trip to maui and how you can win it all coming up in a few minutes. >>> and both the giants and a's in early action on the east coast. highlights on the way. and they make a decision on the option for linebacker smith. i'll tell you all about it coming up in sports. >>> if you have driven through p palo alto, you know how bad it can be. the city is on the the verge of cracking down on downtown businesses. stephanie is live in palo alto. isn't it good to have people on the sidewalk for businesses? >> reporter: we are down here in front of university avenue where the city says a few years ago a car jumped the curb here and ran into a table. thankfully nobody was at the table, so no one was hurt. he says that's why there needs to be space on the sidewalk. make room or prepare to pay up. >> being able to sit outside is the biggest draw to being in downtown prk alo alto. >> yeahious they always seem to be trying to make this area quieter. >> sort of downtown sidewalks and much bigger. it's really super

the disaster happened in the remote province of the mou mountainous border region and the edge of the him lhim laalay too. >> gerald tan reports >> reporter: they spent the night in the open, and during near-freezing temperatures, look over what used to be their homes and praying for any sign of life. >> translator: seven members of my family were here when the landslide happened. 4 or 5 of them were killed. i am half alive. what can i do? >> we have not received any assistance. all of the villages are digging with shovels. it is a big challenge for the people. people who survived the landslide have already left this area. as you can see, there is no excavator digging the landslide. we need more machinery. working with shovels is not enough >> reporter: days of rain caused the side of this mountain to collapse, a wall of mud and rocks swept into the village below, destroying all in its way, hundreds of homes buricked, many with people inside. >> until now, we have only managed to find one woman's body. we took that away. with regard to the aid operation, we have used all of our resour

one young man was skating when he was moued down by the shooter's car. both his legs were broken. and the shooter at the house where katherine cooper and veronika weiss were killed. a third was hit by bullets outside of the 7-eleven. she was on her bike. tonight, we're learning more about the good samaritans who risked their lives to pull this woman to safety as the gunman was still firing. gary tuchman reports. >> reporter: the sounds of chaos. one of the shots you just heard fired by the gunman hit a female student riding her bicycle on this corner. ellen cotnin is the student who caught it on video. >> heard three gunshots getting closer. and then heard eight to ten, maybe 12 gunshots very loud, right below our balcony. >> reporter: also below the balcony, a 7-eleven and pizza shop where students started running into the stores to seek shelter from the gunfire. the owner of the 7-eleven and one of his employees were worried somebody might have been shot outside. so amid the continuing gunfire ventured out and saw the cyclist. >> i saw her and she was asking me, did i really jus