the second one -- it involves clinton administration folks in a more general way. i know firsthand knowledge as to whether secretary clinton was aware of what was going on. i can tell you that i undertook an extensive legal analysis of the fact pattern at the request of the assistant attorney general of the office of legal counsel. a brilliant man by the name of walter dillinger. that fact pattern was handled in a way that was consistent with my legal analysis. i felt gratified that the hard work that i put in on short notice made a difference. host: . . happy st. patrick's day to you people. i'm calling about the transparency thing. i am for transparency. i do believe it is a good thing. what i do not understand is transparency should be through out our whole system. they want transparency with hillary clinton and they want transparency with benghazi. come to find out a few years later after everything was said and done with iraq and president bush, then leading us to believe that it was over weapons of mass destruction. one come to find out that it was basically

this is the clinton administration. this is the clinton administration that heard cries of muslims in other parts of the world and it seemed that despite the fact that the clinton administration rushed sent military to assist muslims in other parts of the world all the while islamic terrorists were plotting to blow up the world trade centers by sending planes crashing into them. now, it would seem if these were peace-seeking organizations like hezbollah like the nation of iran, the administration of that nation at least, they would take note, that, gee, the clinton administration is reaching out every way they can to help muslims in the world and we should take note of that and ease up. but that was not happening. not by a terrorist group, like hezbollah. no. in may of 1999, hezbollah opens fire on northern israel with dozens of rockets, one of the group's numerous attacks. june of 1999 hezbollah opens fire on israel killing two. may of 2000, withdraw troops. strip of land in the south of the country. security zone was

team, pay to play at the clinton administration. those will become shouts unless she releases the e-mails. >> one question, do republicans overreach? the history of the clintons is forgive me you had the monica lewinsky scandal and two republicans lost their jobs. the public believed the republicans overreached. ted cruz is talking about this e-mail controversy. look, there are very legitimate issues about why it was at her home. listen to ted cruz's take. >> well, the allegations that have been raised against hillary clinton appear very serious and on the face of it it certainly seems that her conduct was in substantial continuing with if not in clear violation of federal law. there needs to be an investigation as to whether she violated the criminal laws of the united states. that rule should apply to her just as it applies to everyone else in america. >> turn them over, disclose them, give us a full accounting, i get it completely. is it safe ground for republicans to say violated the laws of the united states? may have violated

clearly they were sort of the the bush administration, the first to negotiate it, the clinton administration to try to get support in the senate and the house a.m.t. added suedette agreements to placate workers and the environment -- environmentalists but it really did very little. we can't repeat the same mistakes in t.p.p. will the side letters be covered by the dispute settlement? what impact will they have on the overall agreement? these are questions members of congress are asking and we're not getting answers from ambassador froman or from the u.s. trade rep's office. it's time that ustr provided some real answers. it's our job to scrutinize every trade proposal to ensure it creates a level playing field and isn't just another corporate handout, another corporate handout that ships our jobs overseas. this lack of transparency isn't limited in t.p.p. i've asked the ustr to make the u.s.-european yawn union, the tip agreement proposals public. these requests have been met with nothing but secrecy. meanwhile the e.u. makes their proposals public. this isn't about protecting the privileges

it was clearly the 1st major foreign-policy success of the clinton administration. and in the aftermath the united states foreign-policy became more muscular, if muscular, if you we will, even more aggressive, willing to take on. in 1998 clinton orders the bombing of iraq to degrade into downplay somewhat the political -- weapons that saddam hussein was believed to have had. but in order the bombing of serbia in the close and because of the war. of course, the serbs to give up rebellious province of kosovo. in that kind of approach, muscular, aggressive approach to foreign-policy continued after 9/11 911 with the us incursion and invasion in afghanistan and then the us-led invasion of iraq in 2,003. this muscular approach took on great dimensions multiple dimensions the aftermath. to help police the agreement drawn into the conflict did not happen that way. why were the piece talks held then? it was inspired. the us military is pretty pronounced. and get together in a very confined area, very safe area beyond the reach of the press beyond the gates of the patterson

the second one -- it involves clinton administration folks in a more general way. i know firsthand knowledge as to whether secretary clinton was aware of what was going on. i can tell you that i undertook an extensive legal analysis of the fact pattern at the request of the assistant attorney general of the office of legal counsel. a brilliant man by the name of walter dillinger. that fact pattern was handled in a way that was consistent with my legal analysis. i felt gratified that the hard work that i put in on short notice made a difference. host: michelle in wisconsin. go ahead. caller: happy st. patrick's day to you people. i'm calling about the transparency thing. i am for transparency. i do believe it is a good thing. what i do not understand is transparency should be through out our whole system. they want transparency with hillary clinton and they want transparency with benghazi. come to find out a few years later after everything was said and done with iraq and president bush, then leading us to believe that it was over weapons of mass destruction. one co

administration of administration in the 90s and today, we're anothers 69 months we're well into the economic recovery it seems possible certainly within the next 5 years the economy will change significantly how it is performing today so the controller's office the budget analyst and our office really looked at what might happen if we experienced a recession like the last two recessions to the.org 9/11 and the international financial banking crisis we've experienced most recently in 2008, and 9 what we see is that if we were to experience a recession like the combination or combine of those two the average over a 3 year peddler almost a billion dollars in revenue all the revenue growth this is showing you the top line which is in the light gray showing you our revenue projects projection that is assumed in the financial plan and the dark gray is showing you in a recession what we think will happen with the revenue so as you can see the revenue increases we're assuming a recession happening you know in 2017 and this almost immediately we lose all the growth tb the first two years and

administration of administration in the 90s and today, we're anothers 69 months we're well into the economic recovery it seems possible certainly within the next 5 years the economy will change significantly how it is performing today so the controller's office the budget analyst and our office really

remember, there is enough evidence to, before us, that a hillary clinton administration would get into some major scandals that could be politically troublesome for democrats. first eight years of the clinton administration was great for the clintonss but messed up the democratic party disasterously behind republicans. they lost both houses of congress. lost a whole bunch of governorships. do democrats really believe you can teach a old hillary new tricks? i don't think so. gerri: to that point, are we going to see her in front of a house committee testifying about benghazi, testifying about the emails? will she come forward? will she come clean? >> well, she will be negotiating for a long, long time about about the ground rules. republicans have to be careful. always a chance she become as martyr and chance they're picking on her. gerri: picking on the girls. so tired of that i can not tell you. it is ridiculous. get you to talk about one more story. secret service blowing it again. interrupting an investigation. officers drunk. not paying a price for it. what do you make of this shoc

. >> steven, in bill clinton's administration, his cia director, john deutsche, faced prosecution for improperly using -- handling classified material that ended up on his home computer. how is that different? what are the ways in which that's different from what we currently know about hillary clinton's case? >> sure, lawrence. there are two critical differences. the first is, we still have no suggestion that any of the materials that then secretary clinton transmitted through her personal e-mail involved classified information. and there are reasons to doubt that would have happened given the protocols that government employees have to go through. >> what is an example of a protocol that would prevent that. >> you need a particular identification to logon to a system of classification. there are security protocols in place to prevent attaching a file -- >> steven, how about -- there is knowledge, there's personal knowledge that the secretary has at certain points that she could just put in a sentence. i'm not talking about transmitting classified documents. i get all that. but the f

so in john deutsche's case in the case of clinton administration official sandy berger and in the case of general petraeus those are the charges. it's not enough to just have something in an e-mail. the question is, are you removing the information, are you retaining it in a way that's not authorized. are you communicating it to someone who is not authorized to receive it which is what we saw in the case of general petraeus. there's been no suggestion that's what happened in secretary clinton's case. it's now the case today that federal law requires someone like the secretary of state to make a public store of all their e-mails. but that law was just signed into law by president obama last fall. so there's no argument that secretary clinton violated a federal statute here. until and unless there's a smoking gun showing that somehow she was communicating about classified information in private e-mails, i think we're a long way away from any evidence that's what happened here. >> jonathan? >> so i can understand why, to answer your question she might want to do this. what happens is -- >

former secretary of labor in the clinton administration feels the same way. i had a facebook page basically saying, do you want elizabeth warren to declare in the race? what's the thinking? >> hi, chris. i think it would help hillary clinton, assuming she runs because as you just said what we know from politics from prior presidential elections is that when you have a strong primary challenger, it helps the actual general election challenger nominee, to be better to have a sharper message, to be asked questions, to practice questions. it helps the public understand what the central issues are. you know as of right now, hillary clinton is the only target for republicans. if there were a primary challenger, there would be other targets. for her to be a target for another year and a half or more you can imagine what this means. it's so easy to just target one person. and finally, it seems to me very important for trks democrats to be able to during the primary season to have a debate about what's important to democrats, what's important to the country in terms o

and do you see a problem with the clinton administration taking donations. let me know on fox news sunday and use the #fns. how do i get hotel deals nobody else gets?... i know a guy. price-line ne-go-ti-a-tor! i know this guy... konohito... and this guy... who knows a guy. hey guy. i know a guy in new york, vegas, dallas. i've known some guys for decades and some, nice to meet ya, let's deal. my competitors may know a guy, but i know over 60,000 guys. and gals. exclusive hotel deals - up to 60% off...priceline.com now with the xfinity tv go app, you can watch live tv anytime. it's never been easier with so many networks all in one place. get live tv whenever you want. the xfinity tv go app. now with live tv on the go. enjoy over wifi or on verizon wireless 4g lte. plus enjoy special savings when you purchase any new verizon wireless smartphone or tablet from comcast. visit comcast.com/wireless to learn more. >>> it's the 11th hour and we must act to provide stable continuous funding for the agencies and programs tasked with defending our home turf. >> this

>> i think it's going to yield this administration the same kind of deal that the clinton administration did in korea. if you remember wendy sherman was coordinator for north korea. she's involved in the negotiations with iran, but now north korea has nukes and everything they promised turned out to be a lie. we haven't gotten information from them since 2007. >> i understand your point but i want to focus on iron and i asked you specifically are you for a deal with iran? >> not without full information. we should never have pulled the sanctions. they were coming forward with more information, but until they gave us complete access to all their facilities we should never have pulled the sanctions. >> there are some sanctions still in place but you feel like they're not effective? >> no. >> the leaders of iran are saying look, wee are willing to put a deal with you but here's the deal. you have to lift the sanctions immediately. we don't want some sort of tenure deal. we're go for a seven year deal if you get rid of the sanctions immediately. >> originally we were going to require complet

there's no time to represent everything that went on in this horrendous moment in the clinton administration. it went on forever. and this produced her famous comment, the great right wing conspiracy. >> did she just play her best card? >> yes. >> which is the woman presidency. >> she -- >> really a desperation move. >> no, i think it's -- i think it's simply just ended. it is a part of her to believe that she is going to run this. the question again is, the american electorate are they going to make this choice that we are going to vote for somebody entirely because of this political correct point we need a woman in the white house. the presidency of the united states with this history? >> look, we are a long way from the nomination. the democrats have to be worried if there's more to come, either from the e-mail scandal or the clinton foundation. how many time bombs are out there waiting to go off on the road to this coronation? >> yeah. a lot. well, i'm speculating. i would suggest a lot given the history of the clintons. james? >> one of the groups that mrs. clinton that is skeptical the

and do you see a problem with the clinton administration taking donations. let me know on fox news sunday and use the #fns. thanks for the ride around norfolk! and i just wanted to say geico is proud to have served the military for over 75 years! roger that. captain's waiting to give you a tour of the wisconsin now. could've parked a little bit closer... it's gonna be dark by the time i get there. geico. proudly serving the military for over 75 years. what's that thing? i moved our old security system out here to see if it could monitor the front yard. why don't you switch to xfinity home? i get live video monitoring and 24/7 professional monitoring that i can arm and disarm from anywhere. hear ye! the awkward teenage one has arrived!!!! don't be old fashioned. xfinity customers add xfinity home for $29.95 a month for 12 months. plus for a limited time, get a free security camera call 1800 xfinity or visit comcast.com/xfinityhome. >>> it's the 11th hour and we must act to provide stable continuous funding for the agencies and programs tasked with defending o

there was a great debate at the beginning of the clinton administration about how to deal with what was perceived as a relatively small recession, but nonetheless a recession, what to do. there were those who wanted to spend their way out and others said no let's have budgetary restraint. that will be better for the economy, that will keep interest rates down, it will tend to restrain inflationary pressures and, in the long run we'll be better off. and that was i think fortunately, the approach that was adopted. and lo and behold, the economy did so well that we got some productivity increases, that revenues increased faster than expected budget expenditures were held down and for the first time in decades we had budgetary surpluses. schoumacher: there was no inflation when it came to goods and services, but the was a sharp rise t pricef stocks. was this a proem?rivlin: alan greenspan coid the term "irriol exuberance," meang that ppl were bing stocks without rega to the futureaings stecause ty thought that the stock market es would continueo go up and up. we now know,f course at ty dn't

senator bradley: i think we have made mistakes with russia since the clinton administration. the expansion of nato was a problem. kosovo was a problem. i think we did things they asked us not to do and we did not build a certificate relationship with them. when putin went to munich in 2007 and laid out his disagreements, we did not take that seriously. therefore, we are where we are today. ukraine is more central to russia's interests than it is to the west interests. the more we try to debate things like sending military to ukraine we split the western alliance. the germans do not want that, the french do not want that, the polls want that. we have to understand what is at stake and take a long-term. i think president obama has done well on this. he came after a long period of time where the wrong policy was made ofon russia. he tried to reset it as problems -- i don't know what the relationship was -- mark: are you saying that given russia has a great interest and ukraine that the united states should not try to get russia out of crimea, should not try to help the current u

. >>> anthony lake served in a number of roles, including national security advisor in the clinton administration. his advice for president obama iraq? >> join with other nations and do everything you can to bringing influence to bear through war. >>> i spoke to anthony lake in new york. as i sit and speak with you your office put out a frightening report about what is going on in syria and iraq and in that region in general. you say that 14 million kids have been affected by that conflict. that is the population of new york, chicago and los angeles roughly, all put together. it's a massive problem. >> it is. it's a huge problem. and over 5 million of them are inside syria, and another 2 million living in refugee camps, in communities outside syria. another - we forget about these - probably over 3.5 million kids are living in the communities in surrounding countries, that are having to try to take care of the syrian kids. that means they are suffering hardships also. and then we have over 2.5 million kids in iraq now. and the numbers are growing. >> is this across the board. the biggest problem

back in the clinton administration when i moved from being a speechwriter to taking on a policy role as senior director of europe at the white house, strobe took me under his wing and it is something i've always been grateful for. i've also recognized the many scholars and experts gathered here as low as the diplomatic corps. germany discussions, roundtables, papers, you helped us better understand the dynamics of central asia as they shifted and evolved through the years. let me also recognize our extraordinarily dynamic assistant secretary of state who has been leading our efforts in this area. fiona said it very well, and indeed to make was prescient because what i wanted to say at the outset was that you could literally plot the trajectory of the region by some of the remarks given here over the years on think tank row. and indeed, 15 years ago had i been given this speech then, i would be discussing the emergence and the breakup of the state of the soviet union. and in fact, that is what strobe did when he gave that speech in 1990's when he gave us a vision of free societies at

both the clinton and the bush administration. and it was hud that was carrying -- >> host: the department of housing and urban development, cabinet agency. >> guest: exactly. the department of housing and urban development was carrying through the mandate's the affordable housing requirements and they were being very tough about them because there was a lot of very good political juice in the for the administration to say which they were serving and in the case of the bush administration, yes, he wanted -- burn was very favor able to the idea of home ownership, and indeed in his memoirs, bush said i was delighted with the way that low income people were able to buy homes and the home ownership rate in the united states was rising, but what i didn't realize was the risks that we were undertaking at the same time. so he kind of apologized in that way for what his administration did, and i think that was the right way to do it. they did not realize the risks they were introducing into the housing system and ultimately into the entir

though the clinton and the bush administration and it was hud. >> host: hud is the housing urban development agency which is it cabinet agency. >> guest: they were caring for the mandates of the of audible housing requirements and they were being very tough about them because there was a lot of very good political juice in their for the administrations they were serving. in the case of the bush administration yes bush was very favorable to the idea of homeownership and indeed in his memoirs wash said i was delighted with the way that low-income people were able to buy homes and homeownership in the united states was rising that what i didn't realize was the risks that we were undertaking at the same time. so he kind of apologize in and that way for what his administration did and i think that was the right way to do it. they did not realize what they were introducing into the housing system and ultimately the entire financial system but forcing fannie and freddie to buy mortgages that were not well grounded. >> host: there are couple of core areas of dispute about the housing crisis. one is

they were tools in the hands of congress and the administration both the clinton and the bush administration and it was hud that was -- the department of housing -- >> which is a cabinet agency. >> housing development was bringing through the mandate and being tough because there was a lot of very good political use in there for the administration to say we have serving. and in the case of the bush administration, yes, he wanted. bush was favorable to the idea of home ownership. and in his memoirs bush said he was delighted with low income people able to buy homes and the home ownership was rising but i didn't realize the risk we were undertaking at the same time. he kind of apologized in that way for what his administration did and i think that was the right way to do it. they did not realize the risk they were introducing into the housing system and ultimately into the entire financial system by forcing fannie mae and freddie mac to buy mortgages that were not well grounded. >> a couple areas of dispute about the housing crisis and one is regulation. should there be more or less? you are a

effectively what he is talking about, which the administration explicitly and hillary clinton explicitly rejected, was a policy of containment of iran. and that may be where we wind up. but there are some very important lessons from the containment of the soviet union. first of all it was a policy that was carried but by ten presidents of both political parties for half century. during that half century we spent an average of 6% of gdp on defense; we forward deployed hundreds of thousands of troops around the ring of the soviet union, owl allies were spending 3% to 4% of gdp. we had tactical nuclear weapons against the soviet border. the containment is not cheap and it's not easy, and the problem that i -- and it was bipartisan. i don't see how this administration, which has got itself into a very partisan situation on this particular issue of the nuclear agreement is going to have the ability to produce a strong bipartisan support for containing iran, which is basically what david is calling for. he may be right. that's where we wind up. but nobody should be under any illusions that's g

and it was also during the clinton administration we had the balanced budget agreement. i think that what we put forward in our plan to use the one time savings to fund infrastructure has all of the ingredients for something that could become a bipartisan agreement. we came up with an approach that we thought would provide that opportunity. if congress has other ideas, we will look at ideas to come forward. what we have to do is meet our needs and invest in infrastructure in this country. it is doing a disservice to future generations. the way to build a better future is to think ahead and build it today. >> great thank you. >> that is a fall back in case your -- >> thank you the time for the gentleman has expired. we're not doing two to one. so we'll to paulson then we'll go to mr. pascal. mr. paulson is recognized. no he is not, mr. markson is recognized. >> thank you mr. chairman. secretary, i would like to discuss a couple issues with you every time i go back home and the town hall meeting. in the projection of budget and economic outlook 2014 through 2024, it appear

they outscores for a deficit. 65 to 57 for the first time since the clinton administration. >>. >> we know what happened. he didn't play didn't play yesterday was fined $10,000 for a bump. green made a huge issue of that after that game. >> 10 grand. >> how about the 49ers. >> we will talk about it you tell us what you want to pay and we help find options to fit your budget. nah, nah, insurance, nah, nah, nah, discount. my name's flo, you want to go out with me? no. uh-huh-huh! ooooh... i can hear that sizzle. getting louder! and louder! philly cheesesteak and egg sizzling with prime rib and gooey cheese. i better (just) silence this sizzle! the new philly cheesesteak and egg skillet. denny's. welcome to america's diner. announcer: it's time to play "family feud"! give it up for steve harvey! steve: hey, welcome to the show! come on, man. how's everybody doing? [applause and cheering] how are y'all? how's everybody? how are y'all doing today? i appreciate you, now. well, welcome to "family feud," everybody. i'm your man steve harvey. we got a good one for you today, folks. we got a fa

now it's been turned around on the clinton administration. listen to what mrs. clinton said about all that back then. >> our constitution is being shredded. we know about the secret wiretap wiretaps, the secret military secret e-mail accounts, it's a stunning record of secrecy and corruption, of cronyism run amok. >> i asked josh ernest whether this white house knew about the fact that secretary of state clinton, then secretary of state had her own server at her home and that her e-mails were going through there. and he said i don't know the answer to the that and several other reporters ss ss questioned him about what they knew. >> especially when they're saying whatever whatever@clinton.com. this is raising a bunch of new questions about benghazi, so go again, what are you learning? >> reporter: what's interesting about this is that josh ernest for two days now has said this white house, the administration at large has cooperated with what they call legitimate constitutional investigations. what are you referring to when wru say legitimate. i pressed josh erne

let's not forget going back to late 2011 i think it was, the clinton administration, the clinton's, i'm sorry. the obama administration filed a criminal charges against the iranian revolutionary guards corps for conspiring to assassinate the saudi arabian ambassador to the united states by infiltrating people through mexico using mexican drug and human trafficking connections. so, this threat on our borders from terrorists, from drug traffickers and the like is very serious. and i think the general is right to point out it's not just isis. it's iran as well which has very extensive network in the hemisphere. >> i suppose we won't take it particularly seriously beyond lots of chatter about it until something awful happens. >> i'm afraid that's right. i think that's the risk. and, to me, the risk is that the next time it happens, it happens with biological chemical or even worse, nuclear weapons. >> well, i was reading today in the miami herald that there is a young man, shane crawford aged 28, who was raised christian and his mother was watching one of the isis videos and lo and behold t

administration and that, in fact, i'm a democrat. i am not one of those people that believes that, you know anything other than a good deal shouldn't be done. i think we should get the best possible deal we can . i think we should embrace the gains that deal gives, but i think that for that to be effective, it needs to be in the context of a strategy. and the strategy needs to work with regional allies to allay their concerns and to rebuild a regional alliance that extends from the gulf to egypt and includes all of those who are concerned by the iranians and gives them the assurance that we are standing with them and we will tolerate no deviation from this. it requires a kind of balanced approach and a long-term view and a strategic framework that we have not seen. i think one bit of absence of a strategic framework is to the degree the iran deal itself has been overemphasized in the context of iran policy. not only when we're worried about iran gaining nuclear weapons is iran gaining ground in the middle east which is a greater thre

the clinton administration didn't behave this way. the carter administration didn't behave this way. this is a new breed of democrats. you talk to democrats. you talk to even liberals, and they can't fathom what's happening. it's like a very small cawed ray of ideological crusaders have taken over ideological policy. whether it's in iran ferguson. irs. it's a fringe administration. enacting fringe policies. one of the reasons they get away with it, not enough people pay attention to the news. (?) until something penetrates like it did with jimmy kimmel and the president, you don't have a republican party with the skill set to respond to this sort of behavior. >> christian adams. thank you for being with us. president obama not the only one trying to play both sides of the issue. democrats have been piling on republicans all week over their open letter to the iranian leadership in which they warned the iranians that a nuclear deal with president obama won't have a lasting effect. it will be simply an agreement between two heads of stat

for 20 years since the clinton administration it's been clear that if you have external e-mails on external e-mail systems that on which you conduct official business you've got to preserve those records as official records. >> what do you make of her statement, i want the public to see my e-mail. i asked state to release them. they said they will review them for release as soon as possible. >> well it's awfully convenient. she's picked the 50,000 pages that she has decided can be released. and we don't have a clue what else there is on those e-mail servers. there could be twice three times that. i don't know, megyn. it's not up to hillary clinton to make that sort of decision. it's up to federal records officials. >> but what about those who say lots of officials have private e-mail accounts, have and had including secretary state colin powell. >> i mean two wrongs don't make a right here. and i'm not 100% certain what the circumstances of colin powell's records are but i'm not here to defend him either. it was well-known when colin powell was secretary of state that you preserved private

when i used to stay up during the clinton administration they ripped clinton 24/7 eating cheeseburgers and smoking pot and hitting on women. >> that is fun. the way they rip on republicans is based on lack of intelligence intelligence. to the left they are crazy behavior, having sex. that's not really ripping. >> that was mean spirited what they did with boehner. that was gross. >> they made clinton seem like a fun guy. it was all in jest and every wup thought he was humorous and a good time whereas sarah palin was a fool and every republican is an idiot. >> as much as they made fun of sarah palin she still has the sense of humor to go on "saturday night live" and do a skit. >> she was at the reunion. the thing that is funny that republicans can take it and laugh about it whereas liberals get their feelings hurt. >> we are so used to it by now. >> we have experienced it. >> if "snl" does a skit of us i will not be hurt. >> now on to sean pen notorious for spending time hanging out with bad guys notably hugo chavez in venezuela. his take on the rise of isis. >> i saw him back stage that

administration put in place and same as the iranians. to give them time in order to develop not only their nukes, but their long- range missiles. >> time is the most valuable bargaining chip. what do we do about this? >> you need to embargo the iranians and look at north koreans. iranians can be developing nukes in north korea and we only look at iranians in iran. that is a big mistake. >> gordon great to have you on the program, thank you. >> opening arguments in the trial of the accused boston marathon bomber. prosecutor said tasarnaev used bombs to kill and maim as many as possible. here is the look of the death penalty case. >> plus trapped by flames in a second story bathroom as firefighters rush to help. how the dramatic rescue. >> just me and my daughter. help us. >> they are coming, okay. >> i am going to die. why do people count on sunsweet amazin prune juice to stay fit on the inside? it's made only from prunes nothing else. it's works, simple as that. it's a natural source of fiber and five essential vitamins. try sunsweet ama