i mean, the -- hamilton. who wants to write a musical about alexander hamilton? i mean you have got -- when they were working on it, they actually were going to take his picture off of the $10 bill. that's how unpopular he was at the time. and then if that's not a tough enough job to do a musical about ham ton, then why deny we make a lot of the songs in hip hop and rap? that sound like a great idea to bring people in. if that doesn't do it, let's put the cherry on the cake, and why don't we have all of the founding fathers, washington, jefferson, madison and the others portrayed by african-american and latino actors. now, that will be a great smash, won't it? you would think, three strikes, you are out. but in actual fact of course the conclusion would be completely wrong. it is a work of genius in my opinion. and lynn manuel miranda cannot -- in way he can be compared to a modern shakespeare in the sense that he takes history and make it available to the general public in a way that shakespeare did. we all think him hard to follow but at the time it was very di

bolton: i might say, i am a free trader, unlike alexander hamilton. [laughter] dan: that was just to get things going. go ahead. you can speak loudly. >> -- carnegie endowment for international these. i have a question on north korea. in february, you wrote an op-ed about a first strike on north korea and the justifications for that. i'm wondering how your thinking on that has changed or not, especially if this period of engagement ceases and negotiations are no longer ongoing. what do you think about military options? mr. bolton: i have written and said a lot of things over the years, and i still believe every one of them. but i don't compare what i said when i was a free spirit to what i say now as the national security advisor, because obviously i am in a very different kind of place. i give my advice to the president and he decides what he is going to do. i like to say i am the national security advisor, not national security decision maker. we are launched on a particular course with north korea. the president is determined and optimistic he can

from the alexander hamilton institute in washington, this is about 50 minutes. >>> good afternoon. glad to be here. happy halloween. i see most important you kept your mustache despite the unrelenting pressure on you. it shows a lot about your spine . >> it turned white a long time ago. >> i thought we would start off , we have so many students here and aspiring foreign policy. what you think has fundamentally changed now and what are some of the promises for some of our students and challenges that you didn't -- that you face. >> i started off as a lawyer. there's no better way to get into foreign policy than to do something else for a long time. for those that are interested in international affairs, this is a better time than there has ever been before. there didn't used to be too much alternative between joining the foreign service at the state department are joining the military and serving in post-overseas, but now i think an american business is so international that you have a much better opportunity to have a variety of career choices. i think where the government still fa

the story about a man alexander hamilton. while he was secretary of the treasury had an affair with a woman and it turned out the womant was sent to him by her extortionist husband in order to seduce him to have the affair, and the man demanded extortion payments and he paid them. and the man said i need more money or else i'll accuse you of taking the money to pay me out of the treasury. alexander hamilton decided to write an essay embarrassing his wife terribly, admitting the your fair, butte denying the money came for from the treasury, why did he do that? he understood the difference between a high crime and a low crime. . son truby admitted to that. he admitted to the extortion. that was a crime but he did not acknowledge that he committed aa high crime because he understood the difference between high crime and an ordinary crime. the framers understood that. >> we are getting a signal should allow questions. >> okay. >> anyone who wants those what questions i guess there's a microphone. i'm not sure i can answer your qu

hamilton pointed out in the federalist papers 69 it couldn't be exercised by the executive branch said it would be less likely e to. it's somehow constitutionally justified under the act of 1973. it makes it possible for the executive branch of government acting alone or the armed forces in cases of emergencies and subject to certain limited to find time constraints but the conflict by no means and in no way, shape or form constitutes a threat to the safety of american citizens and our involvement has surpassed the emergency time constraint. no friends of ours are the regional rebel group that doesn't threaten american national security. in fact the longer we fight against them, the more reason we gave them to hate america and embrace the opportunist enemy in the region. the longer we harm our own interest in terms of trade and broad regional security, the war powers act also states the assignment of u.s. armed forces to coordinate or participate in hostilities of a foreign country constitutes a conflict of war and some have argued we have not been engaging in hostilities and therefore

as alexander hamilton pointed out in the federalist paper number 69, this power would not be exercised by the executive branch. so it would be less likely to be abused, just like it was when the king of england acted in and of themselves and hours for that matter into the board. our involvement in yemen is somehow constitutionally justified under the act of 1973. this isn't true. it is true that the act makes it possible for the executive branch of government acting alone could use armed forces in cases of emergencies and subject to certain limited defined time constraints, but the conflict by no means am in no way shape or form constitutes a threat to the safety of american citizens. our involvement has far surpassedur to be allotted emergencyt. time constraint. while no friends of ours are a regional rebel group or one that does not itself threaten american national security, in fact the longer we fight against them, the more reason we give them to hate americaac and embre our true enemy in the region, iran. the more we prolonged activities to destabilize the region, the longer we ha

alexander hamilton was a nationalist. that might convince the elite that there is really nothing wrong with putting your country first. in fact it's the only truly democratic thing to do. back with us sara, and charlie. >> is america a greater country than any other country. the answer is of course we're the greatest country ever to exist in the history of the world. but macron doesn't believe that. he believes that every country and culture is within the same couple of margin points. are we in the same culture as saudi arabia. of course not. all cultures are not created equal. try doing this type of show where you speak critically of the government in saudi arabia. this is the problem with the globalist. they want a one world global governing body and refuse to recognize that certain countries such as america are more generous, benevolent, upward thinking that countries that embrace collective ideas or ideas rooted in islamic fashion. and i think there's some s sman call differences. steve: he was absolutely choosing to

>> i got that from sander hamilton's -- alexander hamilton's federalist 78. >> that's a good place to start. >> he covers the whole purpose of what, of what the judiciary is supposed to be doing. and in 78 what hamilton said was that, first of all, he was -- the reason he wrote the, apparently, the reason that he wrote the federalist 78 was because the founders, the framers were getting asked by the people, logically, wait a minute, this is a democracy, and we're supposed to elect the government, but you're giving lifetime appointments to these judges. what, what -- how does that make any sense? and i think hamilton's response was we need the judges because -- we need the judges to have lifetime appointments because that will enable them to stand up to the elected branches, the president and congress. and what did he mean be by "stand up to"? it's very interesting what the framers did. not only did they set up, which i assume we will talk about at some point, a triaround tide system of -- tripar if tide system of a legislature, antive and a judiciary, but they also interwove the actio

>> from alexander hamilton's federalist 7078 which is a wonderful piece of work. in many ways it's not only what i will talk about but he covers the whole purpose of what the judiciary is supposed to be doing and in 78 what hamilton said was that first of all -- the reason he wrote apparently the reason he wrote the federalist 78 was because the founders and framers were getting asked by the people logically wait a minute, it's a democracy and were supposed to elect the government but you are giving lifetime appointments to these judges. what -- how does that make sense? and i think hamilton's response was we need the judges because we need the judges to have lifetime appointments because that will enable them to stand up to the elective branches, the president and congress and what is he mean by stand up to? it's very interesting what the framers did, not only did they step up which i assume we will talk about at some point and they tried apartheid system, legislator, executive and judiciary but they also interwoven the actions of each of them which are called ch

hamilton -- his notorious duel with alexander hamilton. back toand then he went washington and continued on as vice president. akhil: and furthermore, he presided over the impeachment trial as president of the senate, of justice samuel chase. philip: for which he was widely praised. akhil: leading want to say that in most countries, murder is arraigned before the judge -- here in america we have the judge being arraigned before the murderer. [laughter] can see how we fell into these area. sometimes these mistakes feed on each other. if you think high crimes and misdemeanors is an open it invitation to a political trial, then you will want to a cabin that my saying, well there must be some underlying crime. in fact, as of drawing the circle tighter, you have really just made the second error prompted by the first one. benno: so it criminal act, for example, a president to announce that he or she was going to rome for a six-month holiday and business,o public that would not be a crime but it would certainly an impeachable offense. a violatio

as alexander hamilton pointed out in "federalist paper" number 69, this power with a not be exercised by the executive branch so that it would be less like lay to be abused, just like it was when the king of england acted in and of himself, by himself to send his country and ours, for that matter, into war. now, some opponents of our resolution claim that our involvement in yemen is somehow constitutionally justified under the war powers act of 1973. this isn't true now, it is true that the war powers act makes it possible for the executive branch of government acting alone to use armed forces in cases of emergencies and subject to certain limited, defined time constraints. but the conflict in yes, ma'am by no means -- in yemen in no way shanks our form constitutes a threat to the safety of the american citizens and our involvement has far surpassed the allotted time constraint. the houthis, while no friends of ours, are a regional rebel group, one that does not itself threaten american national security. in fact, the longer we fight against them, the more reason we give them to hate

always successful these days to quote alexander hamilton. here's what he said and what the founding fathers were thinking about why you have to be careful about a guy like matt whitaker. >> alexander hamilton said it on behalf of the founders, they want to prevent a president from appointing people who were of such insignificance as to render them absequence instruments of his pleasure. and that's matt whitaker, an instrument of the president's pleasure, known as his eyes and ears in the department of justice. so there's an immense practical significance and harm to us in our inability to advise and consent to hold hearings and say whether we approve of this nominee or not. >> two important points there. first of all, the court will ask what harm do you suffer outstanding thin this, and he's saying our harm is our inability to advise and consent to hold hearings. and he's suggesting matt whitaker is of such insignificance and pliancy to render them as absequence instruments of his pleasure, meaning the president's pleasure. >> the entire ide

james logan and andrew hamilton. andrew hamilton is no relation to alexander hamilton. i wish he was. logan is scarcely mentioned. logan was exceptionally a character and he was having a renaissance. he was a quick from northern island. he was self-made self-taught man and he became the kind of right hand man of the penn family. logan was an exceptionally intelligent man, tours of latin, greek uber and lyft guide papers at the circle society of pennsylvania. anyone who goes into that soon comes across logan. he hasn't received the credit he deserves. there's no question scholars will be rediscovering logan. he was involved in franklin's developer. franklin and he were brought together partly really by the fact they both respect each others intellect. quite remarkable the lessons between franklin and logan even from the early days when franco was 25 shows logan river respected in. logan needed a printer for printing his own books which franklin did, but also they should, interest in science and engineering and so on and in defense of the country. those are important poin

. >> took us 193 years to go from alexander hamilton to the first trade with ronald reagan and 1986 came the second trillion in 1995 or thereabouts my 5 trillion and we achieved 10 trillion, is achieved the word? [laughter] in 2008. now, 21 trillion and this year, of great founding press ready, will post a budget deficit in excess of $1 trillion. if you look at the supply of government securities, taking account the expanded treasury, expected that dispositions it is said so elegantly, tightening. that some of bonds will be the greatest as a percentage of gdp since 1945. further to stephanie's point about the rollover drama of next year with the government itself will be very interested force in the bond market and perhaps the bond market will handle - it will decide the treasury is a thing to have. if it does not think that, i think we're in for an interesting times. maria: let me ask you what this means work market. if a great angle in terms of what is this mean for some of the unicorns out there in terms of the borrowing. i want to get take, stephanie, what this means in a once-in-fiv

for so many individuals from alexander hamilton's world. washington's birthday, jefferson's inaugural dinner and lafayette banquet and during his return trips to america in 1824. i could do a whole lecture on this entire list, but we are here to see dr. peter enriquez. >> dr.

i'm talking about hamilton, a musical about alexander hamilton, a man who migrated to america from the caribbean. he's considered one of america's founding fathers and was a close ally of george washington, the first president. victoria uwonkunda caught up with 0bioma ugoala here in london, who plays president washington. when i first saw the show on rodway, my breath was taken away. i thought thatis my breath was taken away. i thought that is the part i want to play. as a child growing up with the cheery and father and an irish mother, how was that like? when people asked you see yourself as nigerian, as irish? is it myself almost and for more —— and mostly as a londoner. you want to embrace so many parts of yourself and so to have that defined by somebody else is always tricky. there is always this idea that you wa nt to there is always this idea that you want to self define yourself, to have the freedom to say me as a human being and all my complexities. what is it matter as an individual to speak up and make your opinion heard? at the moment people feel like we do not have a vo

if you haven't read his alexander hamilton biography, i recommend that you do. >> i thought good. i thought as a democrat the jokes were out of character, bad taste. having a more serious tone to an evening that should have some levity and some maybe historical context will get the president to go which i think is a good tradition that hopefully will be revised. trish: you think he should be there? >> yes. trish: i don't blame him one bit because he has taken so many jabs by the media that to then go and spend an evening where with them and hear himself insulted, his daughter insummitted and his staff insulted and everyone else along the way by the whrieks of that two-bit comedian, she should have stayed a banker. >> i prefer my comedians funny. she wasn't funny. she was miserable. the thing is, i liked it as a conservative because it showed what the gaggle of nerds really thought. how petty and vick deck tough and nasty they are. i love it. maybe trump will show up. but it's great how in their heads trump is. they are doing this so trump will come back. i love how they are crawli

hamilton. the people of st. croix, raised the money, the sort of gofundme activity of the 1850s. to send him to school in america. then they were his family clubbed, and effect. how did people -- how do they win him over like that? >> they were kind of forgotten. he didn't say very much about them. by that stage, he became estranged from those. >> i don't mean to interrupt you but the thing i loved about your book, you make the point, some of this when we try to teach the autobiography,.out, it's not god's truth throughout. you are wonderful at taking the book, i think, there is a gap here. i wonder why he didn't talk about this. then giving an analysis that tells us why franklin chooses to create his life in the autobiography the way he does. i think that is a tremendous strength of the book. >> in regards to the patients, the thing is this. there were two people in pennsylvania to he was especially close. no relation whatsoever. but he was -- i wish u.s. those that he mentioned, those excepti

hamilton and benjamin franklin lamented the "notorious compromises" that were made to tolerate slavery so the constitution could actually pass, they could form a government. here's a quotation. the recitation of historical fact is not racist, nor is it justifying slavery. either andrew gillum is really not all that smart, or he's purposefully lying about something this awful and horrible. it's defamatory and should not be tolerated or rewarded by the voters of florida. racism seems to be one of the most potent forces that the democrats have in their trick bag this midterm season. everywhere you turn, the refrain is the same. >> what i did wrong in 2016 was i overestimated white people. i didn't think white people would put him in office. so here he is running around the country, appealing to our darker angels, appealing to our hatred and fear. and i'm supposed to believe that ohio isn't going to vote for him? that the suburbs in pennsylvania aren't going to vote for him? speak of evidence is there, i have to give the facts and the truth. the truth and the evidence points to him being a

. ♪ >> alexander hamilton story, ♪ the ultimate new york ♪ rivalry. ♪ >> i will bring you to a ♪ memorial in the place that ♪ you have not seen before. ♪ none other than mount ♪ rushmore. ♪ i cannot believe we got to ♪ the top. ♪ am i looking at? ♪ >> the hall of records. ♪ [music] britt: that is a look at "what made america great". i know that you will love it because it is a phenomenal show but also because it is hosted by one of my favorites here, brian kilmeade. andy joins us not to talk about it. i'm actually holding tyrus 's copy. >> i waited in line for this. true story, i did what i had to do and i got this and he autographed it. >> who is going to say something if he cuts you in line? >> and they did not so i got my copy. >> that is what enabled me to be on the radar to do this series. britt: what should we be most excited about? we saw a couple of clips. your personal favorite? >> i've been doing this about one year. taking our time, and our business it is 2 and a half minutes. you do something on nightly news and it is a minute and 15. "fox and friends" is three

hamilton. the hamilton -- the federalists and the whigs to the republican, tariffs, protection, all that. ruth angers tr because he supports taft and ruth says tr believes this stuff. works himself up to believing it and he will grab any weapon like a stick or club or chair leg or table leg and beat his opponents to death when he sees this. all these issues are moral issues to him and he will work himself up. the greatest friends he will work himself up to is in 1912 he is so busy hating william howard taft he forgets how much he hates woodrow wilson and he is going to find that out very very quickly. >> does he regret making that promise of not running for a third term? >> he makes the promise, election night he won this massive landslide, this is it, i am not going to run for a third term. there is no third term tradition which franklin roosevelt is going to break and he doesn't have two full terms. he has only been elected to one. he almost has two terms because mckinley is shot so early. so

. >> he spent a lot of time with aaron burr the murderer of alexander hamilton. there were rumors that gore vidal planted them in his novel burr that maernt van buren may have been the illegitimate son of aaron burr. we don't know, no one will ever know. john quincy adams once wrote in his diary, i saw it, that martin van buren looks a lot like aaron burr, he acts a lot like aaron burr. he was trying to organize factions and get southerners and northerners in political alliances together. >> sunday night at 8:00 eastern on c-span's q & a. >> next on lectures in history abram van engen of washington universi

. >> laura: i am kind of doing and alexander hamilton thing tonight. i'm going to burst out. >> sean: why we are friends, i don't know. >> laura: i don't know, but i adore you. i am laura ingraham. this is beating from a very busy washington tonight. the president taking forceful aim at the special counsel investigation, claiming that mueller's witness tactics are pure of mccarthyism. digenova is here. an anti-trump sitcom is cancele canceled. we predicted it. singer celine dion is pushing a rather unconventional closing line -- clothing line for children. raymond arroyo will break it down. he's here. who are the hidden figures inside the country, our country, helping to guide an organized the caravans to our southern border. a "the ingraham angle" investigation. we have another installment. first, obama's failed recess. that's the focus of tonight's angle. the obamas left the white house almost two years ago. can you believe it? but they don't want you to forget how awesome they were. excuse me. r. with michelle's rock star book tour, the global speec

you know, alexander hamilton warned that the president might appoint people of such incision and ply ansi, they would become mere instruments of his pleasure. this man is an instrument of donald trump in doing his bidding in a slow motion saturday night massacre, cutting funds, cutting authority, and that's what we need to determine in the united states senate if there were advice and consent. >> let me ask you, we've been talking a lot about de core um, the president, you know, using an expletive to refer to adam schiff and many other things, that he has done in that vein. you and your colleagues use some derogative terms in the statement. you refer to whitaker as a nobody. how is that different from that of the president? >> this rhetoric is in legal papers, a complaint that we have filed in the united states district court. what matters here are not our words, but the law. >> yes. >> and -- >> but you're not worried about words like lackey and lap dog minimizing what you're saying and making it sound more personal and more like the president is rightly criticized for? >> the court

hamilton. he fled both jurisdictions, and he was in hiding for a brief period, but then he went back to washington and continued on as vice president. >> and more, he presided over the impeachment try as president of the senate, of justice samuel chase. >> for which he was widely praised. >> leading one wag to say in most countries, the murderer is arraigned before the judge, but here in america, we had the judge being arraigned before the murder.[ laughter ]>> you can see how we fell into this error. sometimes these myths -- mistakes ping one another. if you think the high crimes and misdemeanors is an open invitation to a political trial, then you want to cabin that saying there must be some underlying cause. in fact, instead of drawing the circle tighter, you have really just made the second error prompted by the first one. >> so a criminal act, for example, a president announced that he or she was going to rome for a six month holiday and would do no public business, that would not be a cri

it is the only battalion in the army that is had its antecedents in the revolution and alexander hamilton was the battling commander. that is the only outfit on active duty that has been on active duty all of these years. there was one other comment i wanted to make on that business. i ask the author, have you ever thought about doing the book on the pacific? how many people did we execute in the pacific, and he said, gee, i thought about that, but my wife will not let me. [laughter] some of this stuff is really an interesting book and that is one of the interesting points is you go to one of the world war i cemeteries, and behind the chief caretakers and there is a break in trees and behind that where they have transferred all of the bodies from sicily and italy and so forth, there is no identification except all small plaque with a serial number. that is all. some of the next of kin were queried as to whether or not the relatives brought back whether they were in this category and they did not ask to do that, so that is why they are still over here. >> that particular plot is at the waz

. >> took us 193 years to go from alexander hamilton to the first trade with ronald reagan and 1986 came the second trillion in 1995 or thereabouts my 5 trillion and we achieved 10 trillion, is achieved the word? [laughter] in 2008. now, 21 trillion and this year, of great founding press ready, will post a budget deficit in excess of $1 trillion. if you look at the supply of government securities, taking account the expanded treasury, expected that dispositions it is said so elegantly, tightening. that some of bonds will be the greatest as a percentage of gdp since 1945. further to stephanie's point about the rollover drama of next year with the government itself will be very interested force in the bond market and perhaps the bond market will handle - it will decide the treasury is a thing to have. if it does not think that, i think we're in for an interesting times. maria: let me ask you what this means work market. if a great angle in terms of what is this mean for some of the unicorns out there in terms of the borrowing. i want to get take, stephanie, what this means in maria: we are

alexander hamilton who helped draft and defend the impeachment provision decided to write an essay, embarrassing , embarrasse terribly, admitting the affair admitting thank the money but denying that the money came from the treasury. it didn't come from the treasury. why? because he understood the difference between a high crime and a low cry. and look on his adultery. adultery was a felony punishable by substantial prison truby admitted to that. he admitted to the extortion. that was a crime but he did not acknowledge that he committed aa high crime because he understood the difference between high crime and an ordinary crime. the framers understood that. >> we are getting a signal should allow questions. >> okay. >> anyone who wants those what questions i guess there's a microphone. i'm not sure i can answer your question about marbury. the argument about marbury against madison has largely been settled but there are intelligent smart scholars who think that it was wrongly decided. the interesting thing now about our acting attorney general who i would describe as a political hack, not -- [app

hamilton, about george washington. he says he was asked to, quote, make the case for the first amendment, he said, happy to oblige. he adds, while i've never been mistaken for a stand-up comedian i promise my history lesson won't be dry. doesn't that make you curious about what he's going to say? >> oh, absolutely. i have the utmost respect for him. if you want to make a case for the first amendment, have a comedian show the first amendment in action right after him. have ron chernow say, here is a comedian. it could be about the white house correspondents association, it could be about the media, democrats, republicans. it's not about the white house correspondents association. it's about freedom of expression. we need to be more vigilant than ever, when we have a president who has attacked the media, who has attacked comedians. this emboldens him to go after people who are his critics. they'll say, you know what, i'll self-censor. the democratic presidents have said the same thing. >> thanks so much, dean, appreciate

they had asked me to sing something from "in the heights" and i had 16 bars on alexander hamilton. >> jimmy: this was in the white house. >> this was in the white house. they were doing an evening of poetry and spoken word and they invited me. >> jimmy: is it a good idea to test material at the white house? [ laughter ] >> it worked out okay for me. it worked out pretty well. but it was really scary and i also -- i remember thinking, well, if it doesn't work in this room, i'll just throw it out and i'll try something else. because it was the most mad libs -- you don't understand. the day started with me splitting a van with james earl jones. that's a weird start. >> jimmy: yeah, right. you and darth vader in a van. >> me and darth vader in a van to the white house and i remember looking around the room and it was like a mad libs. it was like spike lee and zach braff and george stephanopoulos. >> jimmy: those three hang out. [ laughter ] >> that's a group? they have a group text. i just remember thinking, if it doesn't play here, like, i'll just -- i'll start something else. >> jimmy:

hamilton and now operated by a right wing extremist, rupert murdock, donald trump said this. it was never publicly discussed but i wouldn't take it off the table. why would i take it off the table? no such story exists in the historical record of any such president ever driven from office by a special prosecutor's office, no such public quote. richard nixon thought about issuing pardons to obstruct the special prosecutor investigation of his administration. richard nixon discussed the possibility of pardoning his white house chief of staff bob alderman who ended up doing 18 months in federal prison, and carl bernstein's book on nixon's final days captured the whispered backstage drama about the possibility of pardons at the white house. a subject richard nixon would not dare discuss publicly. the president's senior advisers including his new chief of staff alexander hague and the lawyer with the best political sense in the nixon white house, were adamantly opposed to the president issuing pardons for anyone including his former chief of staff bob halderman. the president's cr

that's what alexander hamilton said, the originalists say this appointment is unconstitutional. john yu as well. so you've got the whole spectrum from left and right. originalists saying it's not acceptable. >> marcy, it strikes me, i don't think he could be confirmed. he couldn't be nominated now, because he's working as acting. given his resume and record, i don't think somebody can be confirmed to attorney general of the united states. >> i'm never going to put anything by a mitch mcconnell senate. but right, the whole point of confirmation is to say are you qualified? good questions about that. do you have conflicts? really big questions about that. do you have legal problems? i mean, you mentioned the fdc investigation into the company he used to be on the board of. senator whitehouse today raised questions about whether he was in violation of the hatch act earlier this year because he was still getting political donations for 2014 political campaign he ran in iowa, four years after the fact. so he got four donations this year while he's been working as the chief of staff f

so you thought the best duel out of new jersey was the gun fight between alexander hamilton and aaron burr in weehawken all those years ago? with the closing bell ringing in 47 minutes, oh, no. we are watching the new jersey senate race turn into a classic jersey battle bruiser, as democratic sitting senator bob menendez tries to fight off republican challenger bob hugin in a hotly contested race. it could be one of the surprise outcomes in the battles that will determine the senate's makeup. i am assigned menendez headquarters tonight in new jersey for the results, but coming up, these two guys on your screen are probably having flashbacks of fever dreams on this election day. both ran for senate and gubernatorial campaigns and both won. now evan bayh of indiana is about to make a prediction on the craziest races of the night. we'll be right back. think your large cap equity fund has exposure to energy infrastructure mlps? think again. it's time to shake up your lineup. the alerian mlp etf can diversify your equity portfolio and add potential income. bring amlp into the game. before