>> well, first they made the intel committee the impeachment committee. they control it even more making adam schiff the fact witness, the prosecutor, the judge and the jury. he now controls who can ask questions and who could have time, congressman devin nunes has done an amazing job, john ratcliffe, jim jordan has been in all depositions and been part of it, we we wanted to add him for the short time period when intel committee becomes impeachment committee, we will add mr. crawford back on after this is over. maria: john ratcliffe is a former federal prosecutor so he will be -- will people be able to yield time to him or not until an hour in or something? >> well, this is what's so unusual, maria, adam schiff now is dictating that only the chair and the ranker and staff, so he's saying, now staff is more important than member of congress in the first 45 minutes, he's trying to control all of this. it goes back to this is so calculated, so controlling by one person, adam schiff, who is the individual who has consistently lied to america and created grea

he lied to the american public again when he stood at a position of a chair of the intel committee and misread what was in a transcript. on purpose. he was so compelling that the speaker of the house, nancy pelosi, believed him on national television. he lied, again, when he told the american public he did not know who this whistleblower was. and how hard he wanted to fight to bring the whistleblower forward. he had an opportunity that the whistleblower could come forward, just as we have been able to do in the past with the i.r.s. hearings in the 1990's and the others, this is the 21st century. we could protect the individual more, to actually get the information. but, no, that's not the case. because he's driven for one purpose. he has already written the script of where he wants to go on impeachment. he is now just trying to fill in the questions. >> my question -- republicans have vulnerability from? rep. mccarthy: look, you want to come here and decide what you're going to do based upon politics , or do you want to stand up for the constitution? i would hope the republicans, if th

nowhere we would take it out of the intel committee and change their rules, that members of their own committee cannot ask questions until adam schiff gets his 45 minutes and then adam schiff can decide whether he eeds another 45. he was asked at the start, would he decide after the first 45 that the members of the committee could actually have heir five members. -- five minutes. no. he didn't say it. we'll wait and see. so, yes. i think adam schiff has lied numerous times. i do not think adam schiff is fit to be in this position of running the intel committee, and that's only a decision by with you person who could put them in there. yes, i believe adam schiff has spent his entire time in congress, since the president has been in, trying to impeach him. i think he's already written the script. he auditioned the individuals in the basement, and he's picking and choosing them to come forward. why don't we take him at his own word. would he have lied when he came to us in america and said he's so concerned the administration is withholding the whistleblower, that he will fight for this

for example and if you look at intel itself it has a yearly revenue of $70000000000.00 so if you take that in relation it's not the biggest customer of the u.s. companies but it is some good news that did not start with the technology index here on wall street reached a new record high on monday right and what do you think this tells us about the state of those trade negotiations between the u.s. and china is it a positive sign. it is a positive sign but then again the us epona stray ssion keeps him saying that the trade talks on one side and the case of you well by 2 separate issues but still you could see it as a certain kind of goodwill talking about goodwill and there seems to be some uneasiness on the chinese government side that the u.s. president donald trump is hesitant to roll back some of the terrorists already in place to get it trade deal done within the next couple of weeks with china so there is still this question mark when and if and how this trade deal will get done and the next deadline is approaching fast on december 15th there is the next round of terrorists oppose

do not think adam schiff is fit to be in this position of running the intel committee, and by with ly a decision you person who could put them in there. yes-day believe adam schiff -- believe adam schiff has spent his entire time in congress, since the president as been in, trying to impeach him. i think he's already written the script. he auditioned the individuals in he's picking and and choosing them to come forward. would he have lied when he came and said he's a so concerned the administration is withholding the whistleblower, that he will whistleblower to come forward, that they wanted to move legislation on the lie to us then? now he doesn't want to bring the forward, s blower would -- whether to bring the whistleblower forward, i think adam a question for schiff. thank you, all, very much. >> the u.s. house of representatives will be back in noon eastern to start work on legislation extending charterrt-import bank's for 10 years. the bill also renames the bank agency. export finance the rule for debate on the bill include several unrelated measures. allowing the house of repre

you both sit on intel. watch. >> we are at a moment where the nation faces grave, significant, ongoing threats, and she has completely neutered the intelligence committee. she said they must be focused on a partisan impeachment process, and not their oversight obligations. >> laura: this is consuming capitol hill, the media, and we know the reasons they want this president not to run for reelection -- that's what they really want. but her point is something i hadn't even prickly thought of much. >> it's absolutely true. we have had one, laura, one hearing on anything other than this in two months. >> laura: [laughs] my god. >> we are likely to not over the next few months, and by the way, that's not why mike and i and others want to be on the intelligence committee peered we love the fact it was generally t wasn't in front of the cameras, and it's important work. and by the way, such as intel committee, appropriations process, we headed toward a government shutdown because the appropriations process isn't g

foxes ed henry has intel of his own. former new york city mayor michael bloomberg is jumping in the race, how desperate are the democrats? lisa boothe is here on that. >> laura: for weeks i have been urging been urging senate majority leader mitch mcconnell to step up and take control of this impeachment inquiry narrative, he has an enormous amount of power because despite what house democrats might decide, the final call comes down to the republican-controlled senate, and impeachment trial is expected to last six weeks, requires all senators to be in attendance. that means the 2020 democratic presidential candidates would have to be in d.c. and ahead the iowa caucuses. >> when we have an impeachment trial, they have to gather in six days a week trapping all of those democrat senators in washington, d.c., while mayor pete gets to run wild through the iowa countryside, he's going to have a campaign advantage. >> laura: join a big now as chief national correspondent ed henry for fox with some breaking news reporting on all

fox's own ed henry is here with some very interesting intel and also tonight, a special edition -- we don't do this often but it's thursday follies. don jr. triggers the ladies of the view and if you missed it, we were screaming. it raymond arroyo is here with the details and a lot more. tucker carlson, a very unusual drop by by him on what seems to be nothing but collusion among the big three television networks, what is that all about? but first, impeachment by emotion, that is the focus of tonight's angle. f adam schiff is a lousy congressman but he would be an even worse magician. he's forever trying but failing to pull off a slight of hand thinking the audience is too stupid to see him o hide the cad up his sleeve. this impeachment farce, we are supposed to believe that president trump knowing that the dozen people were listening in on his ukraine call was nevertheless improperly using diplomatic channels to plot against joe biden. it's positively ludicrous, the fact that some of the deep state department folks felt it was unseemly or felt uncomfortable, it's totally irrelevant.

. >> new allegations that top house intel republican devin nunes went to vienna to meet with a disgraced ukrainian prosecutor and that he did so to dig up dirt on the bidens. >> the man he met with was the same ex-ukrainian prosecutor that biden and other world leaders fought to get rid of because they say he was not fighting corruption enough. >> and who was fired in 2016 under pressure by many western leaders, including our then vice president, joe biden. he has an ax to grind against the bidens. victktor shokin is the man who claimed to have dirt on joe and hunter biden. he has claimed to have evidence that ukraine meddled in our election. >> plus new documents released last night by court order reveal the white house helped set up a phone call between rudy giuliani, president trump's personal attorney, and secretary of state mike pompeo. cnn's marshall cohen and kristen holmes on top of all these latest developments. marshall has more on congressman devin nunes' trip to europe. marshall, good morning to you, what are you learning? >> good morning. as you mentioned, cnn reported last

we will get to macy's, relatively constructive comments out of intel apple, of course, downgrades for amd and restoration hardware and the swirl of trade headlines we got overnight. here's a look at furutes we are back in a minute. we are back in a minute. >>ow. the van just talked. sales guy, give 'em the employee price, then gimme your foot. hands-free sliding doors, stow 'n go seats. can your car do this? man, y'all getting a hook up and y'all don't even work here. don't act like i'm not doing y'all a favor. y'all should be singing my praises. pacificaaaaa! with employee pricing, get $4,107 below msrp plus $1,000 bonus cash plus 0% financing for 60 months on the 2020 pacifica limited

of a good $11000000000.00 so that is quite a big contract there but on the other side if you look at intel just for example it's all those companies selling components to you all by our micro to get all the g.'s qualcomm window for example and if you look at intel itself it has a yearly revenue of a good $70000000000.00 so if you take that in relation it's not the biggest customer of the u.s. companies but it is some good news that did not start with a sold the to ignore the g. index here on wall street reached a new record high on monday right and what do you think this tells us about the state of those trade negotiations between the u.s. and china is it a positive sign. it is a positive sign but then again the u.s. administration keeps him saying that the trade talks on one side and the case of hugo by 2 separate issues but still you could see it as a certain kind of goodwill talking about to goodwill and there seems to be some uneasiness on the chinese government side that the u.s. president donald trump is hesitant to roll back some of the tariffs already in place to get a trade deal d

here's what he told the house intel committee. back to the transcript here. question, you don't think there was malicious intent to not add those edits? i don't think so. this record is complete? you used the term very accurate? yes. of course, it is. this was a call listened in on by a dozen other officialsls including people trump knew were listening and not fans of his policy. now this gets to the heart what have is really going on behind all of the democrat theatrics. this will play out over the next couple of days. what americans should take away from from phone call is not that this guy should be impeached but thank god someone is out there looking out for america's interest where we have all of these other diplomats andnd experts wanting to shovel taxpayer money out of the door, no question asked. no concern about corruption. it doesn't matter what you did before tomorrow or next year. the money will keep coming. no questions asked. thank god we are not thinking that way. we need more elected officials to do what trump did on that call. question the us

the endless said intel was getting aggressive on cutting prices and that could position intel to aggressively compete. aftery rating increased announcing a new graphics processing unit. that's a look at your top tech calls. qualcomm has been front and center in the development of 5g networks including a partnership with apple and some of china's biggest telecom companies. a ceo set down with caroline hyde to discuss his views on apple and how china is doing in the 5g race. is focused on the things the companies naturally do well together, which is work on products. when you get engineers talking to engineers, things work out pretty well, and that's where we are today. caroline: so the 5g relationship will mean more for you, do you think? >> if you look at what 30,000 people do everyday, it's work on products. when they engage with the partner, whoever that would be, that's a very natural relationship for us. everyone is so interested in driving 5g, and there is a long roadmap to do that. there's a lot of natural discussions going on in the product area and that's a comfortable place for both

army intel and special-ops * veteran, brett velicovich. hugs over bullets is an insult to the children. >> it's a total joke it was destined to fail from the beginning. if the option was for us to sprinkle pixie dust instead of bombs we would do that. the drug cartels are well he equipped, heavily funded and the state of affairs in members coach shows that tack figure doesn't work. i think the president has been forceful about this issue since day one of his presidency. he has basically understood the serious northeast of the cartels since the beginning of his campaign. that's what the wall is all about. that's why he is trying to build the wall. instead we have the situation for our national security. we have democrats trying to put up these obstacles and be they turn this debate into a debate about children over the border. this crisis is spilling over our border. americans are dying. >> specifically, bret, if mexicans won't provide justice in this matter, isn't there some way we can? i know we have had special-ops* programs in countries

what you had from the intel committee were fact witnesses laying out a specific case. now the judiciary committee will start their process by saying what is impeachment, what rises to the level, how should we look at what we get from intel in terms of deciding what, if anything, to charge the president with formally in the writing of an article or multiple articles of impeachment. this hearing sets the stage for that. it's also potentially the first opportunity for lawyers for the president to defend him in a public hearing. the judiciary chairman jerry nadler offers them that opportunity in this letter. we do not know whether he would accept. >> garrett haake on capitol hill. thank you very much. >>> i'm joined by madelyn dean of pennsylvania who is a member of the house judiciary committee. congresswoman, thank you very much for joining us. have you been given assurances that the intel committee report will be released to the public before house judiciary holds its hearing? >> i don't know the timing of the report. that is exactly what we're waiting on, the report fr

as predicted by intel engineer gordon moore in the 60s. law, as predicted by intel engineer gordon moore in the 60sm law, as predicted by intel engineer gordon moore in the 60s. it refers to the doubling of transistors on a chip every two years while the cost is halved. a concept increasingly ha rd to is halved. a concept increasingly hard to keep up with, despite us expecting a lot more from our ever connected lives. the next driver is what we call ubiquitous computing. it is computation everywhere at any time. all the devices are connected. billions and billions of etched devices that are smart, that can compute at any time and communicate and link and that will be the future enabled by semiconductors. it's a future that's not to far away for taiwan. ai is making substantial progress here, especially in healthcare. i progress here, especially in healthca re. i am progress here, especially in healthcare. iam here progress here, especially in healthcare. i am here at taipei vetera ns healthcare. i am here at taipei veterans general hospita

. >> what about an intel look at intel, approaching the highs from april at 5882 right below it want to take profit off of intel or if it breaks out above 59, it's note worthy that's the highest level since 2000 it's breakout coming for 19 years. i don't want to take money off the table in intel i want to buy that breakout. a lot of setups in the market like that. >> what's going on is the real debate between fundamentals and technicals take a look at the october numbers for taiwan, all the oems, 90% reported down numbers. d ram down in october. everything is down foxcom was flat in terms of their production so you've got that you've got nvidia, maybe it shouldn't traded down where it traded down or be up where it's up they're trading up technicals as apple. apple trading up on technicals as the smash apple had down earnings and revenues, that's not a stock that goes up by 60%, right if you trade in pure fundamentals it's money coming into the market we say everybody is negative, but if you look at to josh's point if you look at price, more people are positive than negative. >> that'

those are trump's intel chiefs. so why does donald trump and devin nunes and jim jordan, why do they embrace an ex-kgb agent instead of believing the people that are running donald trump's own intel agencies? >> let's remember that the president has been asked several times, including in heel sifrls standing next to putin, who he believed. and he would not side with the u.s. government over putin. in this matter you know who offered a preview of fiona hill's testimony? vladimir putin. he spoke yesterday saying, thank god no one is accusing us of interfering in u.s. elections anymore, now they're accusing ukraine. >> there you go. >> wow. thank you, devin nunes. >> there you go. start right there. >> let's bring in mayor pete buttigieg. we have been talking about fiona hill and what we saw yesterday and the russian interference in the election and republican's refusing to stand up to vladimir putin. what are some of the things you would do to protect the united states in a way that devin nunes, jim jordan and other r

the hearing take is place before the 13 democrats and 9 republicans on the intel committee, surrounded by tv cameras, broadcasting the whole thing to an audience of millions. the chairman, adam schiff, gives the first opening statement. he usually writes his own and is expected to focus on the stakes and why all of this matters to the american people. that is followed by the opening statement from the ranking member. that ranking member is devin nunes. then the made-for-tv moment when the witnesses raise their hands and swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. and opening statements from state department official george kent, who described what he called rudy giuliani campaign of lies to oust ambassador marie yovanovitch. and the top diplomat in ukraine, bill taylor, whose bombshell closed-door testimony based on detailed notes may make him the star witness in all of this. he is a highly respected veteran and diplomat who has served this country over five decades and was called out of retirement -- called out of retirement by guess who? the trump administrat

we heard from intel last week. they said they are facing a lot of challenges due to a shortage in inventory and some other things. intel makes up about 17% of the chips that to go to dell. frustrationing some from the intel side, given their shortages on inventory. what this all means is revenue growth is slowing. as you can see for 2020, you are 1.9%venue growth of only and the following year 1.7%. analysts pushing the stop lower, down almost 5%. guy: is this a dell issue or an industry issue? taylor: it seems to be a little bit of an industry issue. a year to date basis dell has been underperforming. they are about unchanged for the year. their competitors are flat as well. cisco unchanged, hp pretty much negative for the year. this does seem to be some problems going on in the industry. romaine: thanks to taylor riggs with the stock of the hour. time for a bloomberg business flash. a look at some of the biggest business stories in the news. let's start out with the billionaire owner of the dallas ,owboys hunting

army intel and special-ops * veteran, brett velicovich. hugs over bullets is an insult to the children. >> it's a total joke it was destined to fail from the beginning. if the option was for us to sprinkle pixie dust instead of bombs we would do that. the drug cartels are well he equipped, heavily funded and the state of affairs in members coach shows that tack figure doesn't work. i think the president has been forceful about this issue since day one of his presidency. he has basically understood the serious northeast of the cartels since the beginning of his campaign. that's what the wall is all about. that's why he is trying to build the wall. instead we have the situation for our national security. we have democrats trying to put up these obstacles and be they turn this debate into a debate about children over the border. this crisis is spilling over our border. americans are dying. >> specifically, bret, if mexicans won't provide justice in this matter, isn't there some way we can? i know we have had special-ops* programs in countries

the intel committee bench is not as pro trump as the other committees might be. republicans are interested in getting jim jordan onto that committee. they'd probably have to drop some other member off. they wanted to get another big trump ally on that committee who they hope can try to poke holes in democrats' arguments. this has been traditionally a committee that does a lot of oversight work in a non-partisan fashion, now being thrust into a very partisan role in front of the whole country. >> cynthia, i do want to ask you about gordon sondland, the man president trump appointed as ambassador to the european union. he initially says there's no condition to ukraine receiving this aid. then he says his memory has been refreshed, that he does remember telling an aide to the president of ukraine that, if they want the money for the military, they have to commit to this investigation of the bidens. is there no legal consequence for just essentially, entirely changing your story like that? >> first of all, there's no consequence if there's nobody to prosecute him. th

two weeks is given roughly the same amount of time that the intel committee and the house has worked in terms of its open hearings. there certainly have been many, many more hearings that have taken place behind the scenes. so, maybe roughly draws a distinction between -- no distinction between the house in terms of its movement. but i do think they should actually let the trial take place as long as it needs to take place, in order to hear the proper evidence and then come to a conclusion, a decision. >> former democratic congressman joe crowley, good to see you again. thank you for joining us, sir. >> thank you, ali. >> even with the hours and days of testimony that we've heard in this process so far, there are several key figures in the ukraine story who are not talking to congress. joining me now, glenn kirschner, former federal prosecutor and an msnbc legal analyst. glenn, for all the people we've heard from, who in your opinion is it important that we have not heard from? >> well, ali, the obvious one is bolton. but you know, even beyond bolton, i think there is a real reason f

the intel hearings were focused on fact witnesses, gathering evidence, and putting it on the table. when the judiciary committee takes over, they are putting this into context. the first hearing they are going to try to define what is an impeachable defense, they are going to bring in constitutional and legal experts, and democrats know this is their last chance to move public support in support of impeachment. i think both sides are going to be coming in guns ablazing. you have members on both sides who are fierce fighters for their representative parties. you have members of the freedom caucus on the republican side, members of the progressive caucus on the left, and keep in mind, brian, this is the hearing or the committee where earlier this year one of the members brought in a bucket of fried chicken as a problem to try to mock bill barr for not showing up and calling him a chicken. we are expecting fireworks. at the end of the day, this is a political fight and the last chance to put a bowen of evidence. >> i'm glad you mentioned chicken, every time i mention it, i catch hell o

the opposition is paying for foreign intel on our now president. you have got to wonder how did that happen. he's going to wonder that. so is there a part of you, a part of him. i'm going to just keep look. no stone unturned. we need to find out why this happened. >> we spent much of the last three years focused on foreign interference in the 2016 election. at the end of the day the justice department confirmed there is no collusion, no obstruction, case closed. that doesn't mean there was no foreign interference. and it's something the people have a right to know. the president and the attorney general are making efforts with a well-known prosecutor looking into this matter. we have every confidence they will get to the bottom of it. the maybe american people have a right to know. what the source of all of that was in the beginning. at the end of the day making sure there is no foreign interference in our election. it's been a priority for this administration. trish: anything the previous administration might have done, you are talking about a fis

. >>> in a letter sent to mulvaney yesterday requesting his testimony that shares of the house intel foreign affair. and oversight committees write that they believe he has, quote, substantial first hand knowledge and information relive to the house's impeachment inquiry. however, the white house has said, or signaled that had will not comply with the request for mulvaney's testimony. past democratic and republican stations would not be inclined to permit senior adviser to the president to participate in such a ridiculous partisan illegitimate proceeding and neither is this one. >> so senator rand paul said yesterday, quote, he may disclose the name of the whistle-blower, watch this. >> there's no law that prevents me from mentioning the name of who has been said to be the whistle-blower. >> do you know? >> yeah. >> i don't understand what prevents you from getting on the senate floor where you're protected and just giving a speech and giving the guy's name. >> no, i can. there's no law that stops me from doing it. >> okay. so during the interview, paul said he agreed with senator li

>> as you know, the house and senate on recess for thanksgiving break, but we heard from house intel chief, the chair, adam schiff, on "state of the union" talking about he is willing to open up more hearings and he is willing to listen to additional testimony from witnesses if they become available. he's not ruling it out. as you have mentioned before, taking a very close look at that court case that judge's ruling today, whether or not there is such a thing as absolute privilege or immunity to keep some people from testifying schiff says over the weekend he is still open to the possibility of the former national security adviser john bolton to testify. it has to be voluntarily because if subpoenaed, his attorney has said that they will fight it in court. schiff says they are not willing to do that. they're not going to take the time to do that. they can move ahead with the impeachment inquiry process and at the same time the intel committee staff, they are working diligently on this report they're going to be handing over to judiciary shortly after the thanksgiving break, jim? >> t

, the senate intel community -- >> that's not true. that's not true. >> what's not view? >> a lot of people are very curious about alexander chalupa. >> let's just agree on one thing. there's more afoot with chalupa and with the mp that released that fake black ledger than was ever afoot with the trump team. if we investigate the trump team, let's investigate this team. >> i don't believe -- >> it will be really funny in the end when ukraine, this uber corrupt organization on the planet is more willing to investigate allegations of corruption than the united states it -- >> we've been investigating stuff all over the police. >> but the evidence is there. >> the evidence is not there. >> yes, there are members of the staff of the ukrainian embassy that say it happened. >> for all of you, tom bossert was one of the head security analysts for this president. he's a friend of the president. here's what he said. >> not only a conspiracy theory, it is completely debunked. let me just again repeat that it has no validity. >> why? why would th

also coming up david nunez, the man at the center of the patriot trial, the ranking member of the intel committee, join us for representative nunez coming up. all of that and a lot more on sending running future. >> we will begin with what is official michael bloomberg has officially entered the 2020 race for president. top advisor telling fox news that bloomberg announced iran this morning with this $31 million nationwide ad. steve bannon calls that month ago on this program meanwhile growing concern about democrats seeking reelection in districts with president trump at 2016 and when the time comes for the full house to vote on impeachment. >> i would imagine i would vote no. there is something new, something we have not heard, something that really rises to above all of treason or high crime, that would be different but we don't see that. >> of course that was jeff van drew on this program last week, he said not only is he voting no brother democrat also have concerns to representative andrew about knocking anything done in the face of the impeachment hearing. joining me former white

the house intel committee is writing a report to house judiciary committee, full house vote could come by christmas, senate trial would follow in 2020, a move president trump says he'd welcome. meanwhile we are learning some of the main conclusions of the inspector general's report and how the fbi conducted its investigation into possible links between the trump campaign and russia. in a moment, we will talk with republican senator john kennedy, but first, let's bring in kevin corke with the latest from the white house, kevin. >> legally justified with no political bias, that's expected to be the findings of a soon to be released general's report on the fbi's opening of trump-russia probe into the trump campaign leading up to the 2016 campaign, however, there's also some criticism about surveillance of one-time aide carter page leading up to the campaign. >> however, those familiar with the report's findings, say michael horowitz will cite serious missteps by officials including alter race -- alteration by fbi agent, then followed 2 days later by horowitz's testimony on capitol hill, o

lam research, 94 amd, 115 intel, 23. >> right >> match -- okay, basically with the s&p. nvidia, 58 smh -- >> great place to be and steven wise -- i think he said he was getting out or trimmed a substantial amount >> adding, adding and now he's -- >> i think that makes sense and when i'm looking i used to have exposure in a lot of different names, none of them are there except for intel and like you pointed out it's because of the fact it has not made the kind of move the rest of these names have aed to the upside and i think a lot of that had to do with the transition of the ceo and all the rest of what's going on at intel. >> same thing. i've got nothing zero, zip, nada exposure to the sector everything including nvidia i'm not saying i'm right i'm saying the paper has taken us out as for as let the upside calls take me out. the numbers are still strong you know, so to joe's point as far as what could play out, month over month 7.9% surge in the october numbers as far as the billings for these semi manufacturers, that's strong year over year it's about 4% does it justif

and furthermore, the former chairman of the house intel committee, current ranking member, is going to meet with a corrupt ukrainian official, a prosecutor general who was pushed out of office because he wasn't fighting corruption fast enough. that's the source of the information that devin nunes is using for this conspiracy expedition in europe? he knows better. he knows how intelligence is supposed to work and rather than relying on the fbi or the intel community here in the united states he again is doing political work on behalf of the president. >> julie, do you think that this is likely, this development, to change the minds of congress or the public about this whole impeachment process? >> i don't really think it's likely to. i think what we've seen the last couple of weeks is a lot of facts coming out that sort of fill in the holes of how this entire story developed in the white house, in the state department, in the national security council. all of these efforts that the president was directing to try to get these theories out into the open, to get ukraine to pursue them in o

what more can the intel community do if dr. fiona hill looks at that committee and a national audience begging them not to pass along a story started by russia that ukraine somehow meddled in our election? the intel committee has now briefed the senate please don't pass along this russia propaganda and yet our president did just that on a live television interview this morning. >> indeed. let start with fiona hill herself, brian. when i was preparing to be the supreme allied commander of nato, i kind of went on foot patrol around the circuit talking to experts. everybody said to me this was seven or eight years ago as i was preparing for that four-year assignment, you got to talk to dr. fiona hill. i've known her well over a decade. she is rock solid. she's an immigrant to this country, was born in northern england. she's literally the daughter of a coal miner, ph.d from harvard, a career civil servant who has come in and out of government. i would take her word over anybody's in a situation like this. i'll tell you what, brian

against someone who wanted a $25000000.00 reward let intel against someone who wanted a $25000000.00 reward literally sold out baghdadi and his underwear. it's own the really sold out god and his underwear. it's almost like people respond better to $25000000.00 then electric shocks to their bills like people respond better to $25000000.00. alors then electric shocks to their. humans are mysterious creatures are. humans are mysterious creatures are in the region safe for now but. know no way in the region save for now but. no no way much like bin ladin but daddy was past his prime when he was killed and we now much like bin ladin but doubt he was past his prime when he was killed and we never wanted the region to be seen for he was found hiding in turkish territory where he never wanted the region to be seen for he was found hiding in turkish territory where the us back to rebels are being protected so we were in directly protecting the us back to rebels are being protected so we were indirectly protecting isis yes indeed we were now there are several questions yes indeed we were now

what's the viewer's guide to the judiciary now as they take the baton from intel? i think it's safe for everyone to admit they were rather embarrassed during the corey lewandowski appearance when they were last on live television. >> yeah. so now we're in the judiciary hearings phase of this, committee phase of this, and now they're going to lay out the legal case, right? they're going to lay out the constitutional argument. and we're going to see history here. we've never seen a president get impeached for national security. so that's the articles of impeachment that we're going to see. and so it is going to be probably a month-long process. and it's going to get voted out of -- they're going to present the articles of impeachment and it's going to get voted out of the house, and i believe we're going to see a president who will be impeached on national security. >> and david jolly, forgive me. i buried the lead. mike pence came out for impeachment. i should probably add for clarity, the impeachment of bill clinton. this was reprinted today. an op-ed he wrote back

it gives all the power to the intel committee. there was no intel committee when the founding fathers brought the statute for impeachment. adam schiff who was a prosecutor. never jail now because of adam schiff, the man who lies the most on capitol hill should have their cases reexamined. he doesn't have to have the president's counsel in chamber when he does these hearings. he does haven't to release all the transcript. this is a show trial. adam schiff is rebuilding socialist show trials here in america. he's championing the anonymity for the faux whistleblower. there is a narrow provision that says the inspector general can release the name or withhold the name. but that applies to nobody else. this is such a myth that he's entitled to anonymity. adam schiff started all of this and he's trying to hide with anonymity, this whistleblower doesn't qualify as a whistleblower to conceal schiff's own machinations in creating all of this. in the end do you think the whistleblower will be forced to testify as a fact witness? >> noting t