only thing that india can do with obligations to britain is invest in britain. right. they have pounds. they can't sell those pounds for dollars on a free market. so they have to use pounds to invest in britain in, things that are for sale for pounds and that's good for britain because that allows sterling to come back into the british isles and allows the british government then to have currency to pay for other things. but if, say the americans as the terms of their loan have said that you should be able to sell sterling on a free market, then all of a sudden india can just sell their pounds and not reinvest them in britain. and it is a disaster oyster. they agree to it as part of the terms of this language. they desperately need and they do put in place free convertibility on july 17th, 1947, they got it almost immediately, not least because they had scheduled to happen less than a month later. and they go through with indian independence. once india is independent, you have no real mechanism to stop them dumping their and that is not what britain is for by a

in the global context, great britain remains one of the leading forces in world politics.ter leaving the eu, london is building new formats for interaction with european capitals. and one of these steps was the signing of the agreement with the eu on a new partnership in the field of security and defense. britain is also launching large-scale rearmament, construction of new factories, ammunition, creation of a hybrid fleet, investments in the nuclear program and social protection of the military. against this background, london sees in kyiv not only a partner in deterring russia, but also an important player in the new european security system. indeed, britain is playing more and more actively, and after brexit , london seemed to feel its own significance and status permanent member of the un security council and the presence of nuclear status. today we invited andriy grubinko, professor of western ukrainian. national university to discuss the situation that has developed in the british isles. mr. andriy, i congratulate you, thank you for agreeing to talk to us, and i will

in 2025 alone , britain is allocating 4.5 billion pounds sterling in military aid. in particular, it is planned to transfer 100 thousand drones to ukraine by april 2026. year, and another 3 billion dollars from the profits of frozen russian assets, which will be used to purchase armament, repair of equipment and implementation of joint projects between ukrainian and international defense companies. such a flexible model of assistance with a focus on cooperation indicates britain's intention to support not only ukraine's defense, but also to strengthen its defense industry. at the same time, london is actively advocating for russia's legal responsibility. head. british foreign office david lammy openly supported the creation of a special tribunal for the crime of aggression. britain emphasizes that even after the end of hostilities, support for ukraine will not stop in the military, economic, or humanitarian spheres. in the global context, the united kingdom remains one of the leading forces in world politics. after leaving the eu, london is building new formats for

, britain, britain, britain , britain, it says britain. but she is a spy, it is more likely a melady,inkina, the cat travels with them, miloni, pardon me, she's more like meledy, the cardinal's spy, they argue about who of them is dartanian, and oh, listen, how beautiful, they argue about who of them is dartanian, because what's the point of this argument, financial and economic problems , you all say that, europeans, and i am dartanian, after all, we came from vokangemo.

britain, once again, specifically britain, is not ready and will not be ready, well, that's impossible. but there is such a thing called rhetorical escalation, politics is about words, it's not a sale, such a term, let me throw in, verbal intervention, yes, that's absolutely right, well, in this case in one bottle, rhetorical escalation. on the one hand, naturally should lead to reactions on the other, we we can't ignore the words of politicians, because politicians are supposed to speak words, they speak like this, well , no, if so, then listen, then the message on twitter, give us this message on twitter again on our embassy account, well, yeah, this, this is the only thing, this is the maximum that kirstar can count on in terms of a response, that is, this is like this level, how we perceive its level. if we take serious conflicts, and they had to participate, and the first, second world war, napoleonic wars, the war of the spanish succession, the seven years' war, the crimean war is mentioned here, where the british suffered heavy losses, although they remained among the victors, n

a government backing britain's industry, backing britain's jobs and backing britain's workers.nsider that a promise made and a promise cap. thank you, congrats. applause that was rachel reeves, the chancellor confirming government investment in sizewell c, the new nuclear power station in suffolk. she talked about the biggest roll-out of nuclear power for a generation. it will be £14.2 billion for that sizewell station. it will take at least ten years to complete an generate enough electricity for 600 million homes. -- six million homes. the last investment of that size was in the 70s. that will come up in a spending review for tomorrow, investment in security, health and economy. she talked about the investment beings some of the largest investment in public services in 1970s, hundred and 13 billion in new vestments. we turn to our breaking news from austria where local media and police are reporting several people killed in an attack on the school in the south of the school. the police have confirmed that several people have been killed in this attack. our correspondent betha

in britain, we don't in britain. britain does. britain is home of freedom of speech. it is the foundation of freedom of speech. except that britain always understood the classical liberal definition of freedom as by john stuart mill, who i don't think i would approve of entirely, but anyway, you know, he said, freedom is you. it is imperative with living within, with limits, you must not harm others. that's the point. and that's the point that america doesn't seem to understand that, you know, you have freedom speech regardless of whether it harms others. britain don't have that. we shouldn't have that. unfortunately, in the last few years we've had that in britain. you know, you've had people on the streets saying death to -- never out freedom of speech. but that's because, you know, liberal society has lost plot. freedom of speech is part of it. liberal societies turning on its own values, going far broader and deeper and beyond. freedom of speech. your point well made. but i think it's is a little bit nuanced than perhaps you would allow. okay. final question. we k

that's our view in britain.ot -- we cannot step back from the challenge that we've taken on and that's why we are in absolute solidarity with the ukrainian people and their fight. >> so in that spirit, it sound to me that you would endorse the senate package, the new senate package put together and in general a tougher approach of the u.s. toward ukraine -- toward russia? >> it's a matter of judgment when the time will be right to deploy it. >> let's go back to technology. i think you've touched on something that we probably don't spend enough time on, given its importance right now in relationships everywhere, this race for the commanding highs of technological change. >> the future industries of tomorrow. i mean, much rather have our government devoting itself to claw back the manufacturing of the past century. let's focus to the manufacturing of tomorrow in this century, that's what we've got to laser-like focus on in my view. >> agree completely. where do you see the richest areas, where do you see it going

this position is here, which is accepted in european countries in great britain , including, obviously affects the negotiation process on the participants of the negotiation process from the ukrainian side, because approximately the same statements are being made from kiev, at least they were before, but what actually happens at the negotiating table remains behind closed doors, and we only know what our participants of our delegation said, they were generally. the results of these negotiations, as far as we know, are quite, evgeny, as for the summit in vilnius, where did zelensky fly to, what is stan discussing? zelensky once again asked for additional weapons and money, he also stated, that's basically what i told you about, what pestorius said, he said almost word for word the same thing, that as a result of a peaceful settlement it should not turn out that russia received anything as a result of this process. but this is such a declared maximalist position that western figures listen to, nod their heads, and talk about what else can be done in order to cause maximum harm to russia,

great britain developed until the fourteenth year so successfully that again they reduced the numberf armed forces by 10,000, it turned out that there were not enough sailors on the ships, therefore the destroyers were put on hold, in principle, so all other things being equal great britain approached in poor condition by the summer of 2014, when trump became president in the united states, well, he was starmer in the fall, a little earlier he became prime minister in july, but... he drove her away, after trump in general, she landed as a rector at some provincial university in great britain, they got her here, that's when i read this open to the public. so to speak, a stream of consciousness, then there are several interesting things there that, well, in general, help us understand what modern great britain is, let's start with the fact that, well, historically in great britain the ground forces were not very powerful, the british air force, well, probably showed itself for the last time during the years of the second world war, after all, the navy was the basis, yes, of power, alth

britain is also launching large-scale rearmament, construction of new factories, ammunition, creationid fleet, investments in nuclear. program and social protection of the military. against this background, london sees kyiv not only as a partner in deterring russia, but also as an important player in the new european security system. indeed, britain is playing an increasingly active role, and after brexit , london seemed to feel its own importance and status as a permanent member of the un security council and the presence of a nuclear status. we invited andriy today. the wife of a professor at the western ukrainian national university, to discuss the situation that has developed on the british isles. mr. andriy, i congratulate you, thank you for agreeing to talk to us, and i will ask a question about, in my opinion, a rather revealing meeting, because recently nobel laureate oleksandra matviychuk had an audience with king charles ii. how do you assess this meeting, which may not have lasted that long, but well... in such meetings with monarchs there is always a subtext, congratulatio

great britain, but for now it has become little england.nd understands that the us is moving towards a policy of isolationism. and now britain simply wants to be, probably, a forward of the anti-russian policy in europe and the main force of nato in europe. on the european continent, in addition, the review, by the way, mentions such a quartet of states, russia, china, iran and the bpdr. the british are very concerned about the strengthening of our interaction, cooperation, partnership, but china, the british are still cautiously calling it a long-term challenge for themselves, that is, russia, if this is a direct, a direct threat, then china is a long-term challenge, again, this is due to the fact that britain simply does not have the money. the british really need chinese investment, so here they are still cautious, what else can i say, well, if we talk about what they plan to do, they plan to increase defense spending to 2.5% of gdp by 2027, with the potential to increase spending to 3%, they plan to strengthen their nuclear potential an

that is who i am representing at summits like this, the working people of britain.navigating the world requires cool heads and defy simplistic answers and kneejerk judgments. we don't pretend we can fix every global problem but we can carve a unique path through these dangerous times to secure and renew britain in an era of global instability. that's what our plan for changes is all about, putting britain's national interest first. after years of economic chaos, we've delivered economics ability for the british people. after years of our armed forces being hollowed out, building up our military, firing up our industries, leading in nato, supporting ukraine, keeping britain safe. after years of real alliances, we are rebuilding and shaping them to serve the british people. we are using every ounce of our global influence to deliver for working people and deliver in the national interest will stop and i commend this statement to the house. the leader of the opposition, kemi badenoch. thank you. i thank the prime minister for advance sight of his statement. he has elev

india was a huge source of wealth for britain at that time. x until the middle of the century, india was not a colony in its pure form. these were territories that were governed by the private east india company, however, it acted on behalf of the british crown, as a conductor of the idea of ​​the british crown, in the interests of britain. the very idea that there can be a governed state, not just a state, an entire indian empire, governed not even by some private person, yes, but generally speaking, by an inanimate being, a company, it explains a lot, this is actually already a political organization of the future, something that we are now gradually coming to. the company controlled vast territories with the help of sepoys, the so-called mercenaries who were recruited from local residents. the rulers of the indian principalities transferred the management of foreign affairs to the company and paid a subsidy for the maintenance of the company army. in addition, they kept british officials, residents at their courts, that is, the capture of i

but the head of the armed forces insists britain's defences will be stronger.days like today are important, and they reflect the importance of defence for the whole nation and reflect the ambition that is there in defence and reflect the certainty about good jobs in the future and a british defence that is getting stronger. the government's already committed to increase defence spending to 2.5% of gdp by 2027. it talks of "an ambition" to spend 3% in the 2030s, after the next election. the review says "it may be necessary to increase that faster". as this map shows, other allies are already doing that - the darker blue shows the countries already spending more than 3% of their gdp on their military. many agree with this review - that the threats are rising - and are spending significantly more. defence and security correspondent. -- that is jonathan beale, our defence and security correspondent, there. russia and ukraine have failed to agree on any ceasefire at their latest talks in turkey. the second round of discussions between the two sides in istanbul laste

cuts, how to solve the reduction in the number of jobs, and i remind you that after brexit great britain has lost over 2 million jobs, and this is the solution to the problem, for example, of certain sectors of the economy, for example, fisheries, agricultural policy, trade relations with the european union, so far. e finally unresolved issues, that is, many social problems from the last such problems, for example, this is the government's refusal to actually fulfill its election promise to help, well, as we say, the low-income segments of the population for the heating season, that is, well, something like our subsidies, so the government refused this in the spring, and of course, these internal factors, the price policy, which has not been resolved, is not high enough in britain, along with, as i said, miscalculations and essentially the absence of serious steps in the external arena, all this leads to the actual decline in the popularity of the labor party, and there is someone to work against them in the domestic political field, of course, that is why the situation is like this now,

and in principle, all other things being equal, great britain approached the summer of 2014 in a badtate, when, then, he became president in the united states. trump, well, in the fall, starmer became prime minister a little earlier in july, but then at the end of the twenty -fourth year they announced that now we will get down to business, but then it turned out funny and stupid, as is sometimes the case in great britain, it shows the weaknesses of this country, let's start with who wrote this document, well, he wrote, by the way, the document itself, most likely it is secret, well, or in any case a secret, but for parliament they prepared a decree of the author, there are two authors, one of them is known... they took this version into service, the americans promised them that they would modernize and support, but still they want to make their own nuclear warhead, and also in this, and they want to make it from what, well they have, well i don’t understand much here, except that a modernization for missiles, wait a second, they have a stock of highly enriched, they had a good proje

iran could no longer wait to see what america or britain would do. this series of events and incidents had placed the persian gulf issue and persian gulf issues in a very prominent position in terms of politics. the iranian foreign ministry and the then foreign minister, mr. zahedi , understood very well that a special department in the foreign ministry was necessary to deal with the issues of the persian gulf territories and until then, the ministry of foreign affairs had 8 political departments, and they established another department as the ninth political department. when i came, it was necessary for us to have a special department for the persian gulf and our neighboring countries that could be focused, responsible for studies, and as the saying goes , we decided to create a department called the ninth department , and this responsibility would be his . i expressed my interest in this matter, and he said that i would also consider dr. zand's leadership in this new department and the establishment of all issues related to persia. he was focused t

are moving different stories. as for great britain , the usa, the usa and great britain are the only ones, except for china, by the way, which is now under pressure is located, an agreement was concluded, and not a trade agreement with them was signed, i keep you informed, within the framework of which, in fact, they promised to squeeze out china, after that they have such rhetoric, their rhetoric is not that they stuck the russian federation there, as if it were always plus or minus, it is important when it was announced on the second day with the purpose of putting pressure on the negotiating groups, well, this is understandable, as everyone usually does there, the second part, that they nobody stuck china in, this is by the way, china had a very serious positions, and even last year, the year before last , serious positions in great britain, they entered into telecoms, they entered everywhere, that is, now trump is squeezing china out of the entire market, all the agreements that he is making with india, with vietnam, with cambodia, with china, paradoxically, they all assume squee

, whose britain is that, right? um, no one's going to fight for kier starma, um, so yeah, he's got a shot coming, see palestinian flags here too, it doesn't. surprised me at all, it's all connected. i think i think palestine in particular has become a lightning rod for all the accumulated anger in society, when people come in these protests and and fly the palestinian flag, they're saying this is the side that we choose, it's the side of the oppressed, it's the side of the exploited, um, and and that means the starm is on the other side and the labor governments on the other side, and i think this movement can grow off the back of it. fionalali, thank you so much, i really appreciate it. so that was fiona lali, the campaign's director for the revolutionary. communist party of britain, and as i say, um, they're saying, the protesters here, the more action is planned uh, unless and until the government reverses these proposed cuts, some, if i have any time, some stark statistics to to share, danny, um, 4.3 million kid

iran could no longer wait to see what the us and britain would do. this series of events had placed the persian gulf and its issues in a very prominent position in terms of iran's foreign policy . the then foreign minister, mr. zahedi , understood very well that a special department was needed in the foreign affairs department to deal with the issues of the persian gulf territories . at that time, the ministry of foreign affairs had 8 political departments , and he established another department as the ninth political department. when i came, it was necessary for us to have a special department for the persian gulf and our neighboring countries that could be focused , responsible , and studied. as the saying goes , we decided to create a department called the ninth department , and this would be its responsibility . issues related to the persian gulf were focused there and organized , such as the so-called "pratkard" issues , determining and threatening the borders of the euphrates, the continent of iran, with neighboring countries , the bahrain isla

britain, germany and france, including poland again, poland joining them, are uniting in order to opposeh a rapprochement between the us president and the russian president, and will allegedly demonstrate their position during the upcoming nato summit in june, actively promoting the invitation of volodymyr zelensky there, so this is how the picture is now emerging, as far as the specific presence of specific representatives from european countries in istanbul is concerned, there is still no clarity no, but it's a big city, there's probably room and... in that there are personal relationships there that are very strong, because i think what president trump has done as a president, he's done something that we haven't seen from any president in a long time, which is personal involvement, i mean he's putting his reputation on the line, his leadership, and you know, i've said this to the president before, i said you're very much like winston churchill, and i said i mean winston churchill during world war ii used words as a weapon and president ram does the same, and he is very good at it. chu

, how do we know, and the king of britain to us, is he now a great friend or something, the king britaint our friend, well maybe the person has gone crazy and is celebrating the birthday of the king of britain. and the british flag in a kindergarten is clearly not crazy. the british flag and especially the portrait of the queen in a kindergarten is a completely different matter, because if what you do in your apartment and on your balcony is your personal business, then a kindergarten is where children are raised, and this is a public place, but they introduce children to the culture of great britain, in the form of the queen of great britain, yes there is a whole altar of this queen there is no acquaintance. my child goes to kindergarten, for some reason there are no british flags, on the contrary, for some reason they raise the russian flag in front of the kindergarten, the children really like it, but what if we are talking about the black reaction, here is alexander nikolaevich, probably in his youth he read a lot of books from the series of fiery revolutionaries, that's where this p

wants, hello, britain wants, britain wants with the hands of ukraine, no?oke about them, he told his soldiers, you will get planes, you will get 12, 12 submarines, well, by the next millennium they will build them, yeah, okay, by the way, here's the question about what we talked about in the previous part, what part of well, published in the statements of the leaders delegations discussed, and what remained outside of public statements, just now they brought me news: and medinsky, umerov and fedan held a joint meeting before the start of the second round of negotiations between the russian federation and ukraine in istanbul, that is, before the start of this public joint round, maybe, by the way, that is where this very delay occurred in part, in this sense again, yes medinsky, umerov and fedan, but we understand that behind each of, well , i don’t know about turkey. but behind britain there, as if invisibly, in the sense of ukroreikhom, the british were invisibly present there, although alexander yuryevich, he says, no, in general, that britain should not

official historiography says that the great game is a geopolitical confrontation between britain and russia for control over the balkans, the black sea, the caucasus, central asia, afghanistan and even partly china. this confrontation allegedly began in 1856 after the end of the crimean war, and ended in 1900, when the russian empire entered military and political alliance with britain and france, that is, the entente. in reality , the big game began much earlier, even in the time of troubles, britain tried to either seriously weaken russia, or rather the muscovite state, or even colonize it. from the second half of the 16th century, any strengthening of the russian empire in the caucasus or in the asian direction or on the black sea was perceived by london with extreme alarm, it was perceived as a threat to national interests. britain, first of all, its indian colonies, a threat transit of goods, threat to national capital, empires collapsed, leaders changed, states fell apart, but one thing in western politics remained unchanged for centuries, it is geopolitical. because russia is

is already gone, britain just runs in the code tails of of the us, i think that that we have to lookat iran, china, russia and the bricks countries putting together and facing down this this

, this is absolute nonsense, to hit britain in britain there is a huge number of contradictions of religiouses of any kind there are again britain is sewn from the caresses of so to speak peoples, who also in this case many of them dream of freedom, our task is this achilles' pita, in this case we just need to make it achilles' pita, we have huge opportunities for this, we have now entered africa very powerfully, africa can very powerfully enter britain. that is, it is possible to act in a roundabout way and turn the life of britain into hell, when the streets will burn, when there will be street battles, when urban guerrillas will appear, when scotland will start fighting for freedom not with banners and flags in their hands, with rifles and bombs, you understand, this is what needs to be done, that is, when the ground will start burning under their feet, when they will discuss in their programs, well, surely the russians are behind this, that's what i wanted to say, after such statements vlad, they will now make a cut and say: you see, russia is a threat, here behind all the unrest, these

impoverished britain. grants soon for your britain. it is not us who say so, it is european sociology that says so. judging by the survey data, there is real trouble there. the report of the national centre for social research makes it clear: it is time to sound the alarm. 26% of respondents believe that they have difficulty making ends meet, for comparison, before the coronavirus pandemic, this figure was 16%. 2/3 of respondents also believe that their incomes are not keeping up with inflation, in other words, those who can answer the question of who lives well in britain positively are only about 30%. the dirty everyday life of the british military. britain's largest military base is overrun with rats due to overflowing rubbish bins from... one of the officers living at caterick garrison in north yorkshire complained to the newspaper. every morning we have to walk past rat maggots and piles of rubbish, it's just awful. colonel philip ingram, who previously served in intelligence, called the situation at the base a failure of command

as for cyber attacks, it is britain that is now posing a threat to russia. britain is openly declaring its readiness to attack our country with a mouse in its hands. the keyboard has become a weapon of war, which is why i have committed to spending £1 billion on the digital modernization of our armed forces. modernization, starmer said, will be done at wartime speed. the british government's new goal is to create an army 10 times more lethal in 10 years. the main goal of the british armed forces is to be ready for war with russia. in addition, starmer has promised to spend £20 billion on a program to modernize the arsenal of nuclear warheads. as part of our aucus alliance in we will deliver up to twelve attack submarines to the us and australia and aim to deliver a new submarine every 18 months, creating thousands of jobs. we will also invest in opportunity. so in response to the announced spending, a down-to-earth question for the government, when will the billion-dollar home heating allowance for pensioners be returned, when will the payments for large fam

britain, of course, feared russia's growing influence in afghanistan. and she was afraid that this could affect the position of the british empire. in india or then lord auckland makes a serious mistake, he sends dost mohammed, who was still in doubt whether to be friends with russia or england, a personal letter in which he demands that vitkevich be expelled never again to receive foreign ambassadors without the knowledge of the government of british india. in response, dost mohammed receives vitkevich with all conceivable signs of friendship and respect. an alliance treaty is concluded between russia and afghanistan. burns is expelled from kabul. declared a strong protest against the hostile activity of vitkevich, who seriously threatens the relations between the two powers. this is almost a verbatim quote. the british foreign office demanded that st. petersburg immediately recall vitkevich, and at the same time the russian ambassador to tehran simonich. and nicholas i cannot withstand the pressure of the british. he declares. for the first time. acti

mi6 plays a vital role alongside mi5 and the gch in keeping britain safe people and promoting britain's interests abroad. she added: "i look forward to continuing this work alongside the brave." officers and agents of mi6 and our many international partners. i say you better. my god, why did you do that? her department has fended off threats from adversaries such as russia, china and iran. her appointment marked a significant shift from the traditionally male-dominated world of british espionage. former latvian mp aleksey roslyukov has been arrested on charges of inciting discord and assistance to russia's work against latvia. the reason was his rather emotional speech in parliament, where he said from the rostrum we, that is, russian-speaking latvians, the majority of our language is russian. millions saw this phrase in a day, the video literally flew around... social networks everyone calls roslipov vatnik and an occupier. further events developed rapidly. a criminal case, amon, in masks, searches at the deputy. according to roslikov, the state security service had long warned him abo

that of the armed forces says that britain's defences will be stronger.ays like today are really important and reflect the importance of defence for the whole nation, representing the ambition of their defence and reflects the certainty about jobs in the future and the british defence that is getting stronger. the government is already committed to increasing defence spending to 2.5% of gdp by 2027 and it talks of an ambition to spread 3% into the 20 30s after the next election but the review says it may be necessary to increase that faster as this map shows, other allies are already doing that, the very dark blue poland, lithuania shows the countries already spending more than 3% and nearly 5% of their gdp on the military and many agree with its review but the threats are rising and they concluded that they need to spend a lot more money. sir keir starmer called the review a blueprint to make britain safer and stronger. our poltical editor chris mason has more from glasgow if the aim was to find a big space for what would build us a big announcement, the

and in early 1854 , britain and its allies enter the war on the side of istanbul.nce and england supported the ottoman empire at that time, because the ottoman empire was blockading russia at the strait. russia at that time was undoubtedly the strongest state in military and political terms, and this allowed england to create a truly pan-european coalition. military actions in crimea, military actions were taking place in the caucasus. and naval actions were taking place in the baltic sea, in the white sea. the british squadron entered the sea of ​​okhotsk, besieged peter-paul skanchatsky. and this post had to be evacuated to nikolaevsk on the sea. russia could not counter this tactic of strangulation from the sea. september 2, 1854 , anglo-french-turkish landing. about 60 thousand soldiers landed in crimea. the allies had absolute superiority in weapons and dealt the russian army a series of crushing blows. the anglo-french fleet occupied kerch. in the autumn of 1854, sevastopol was blockaded and a 349-day heroic defense of the city began. but the allied ships wer

, and no one from the british authorities, why am i talking about britain, because it is in britain thatple manage to be jailed for posts on social networks, here for an appeal that violates all current international legislation, nothing happens, nothing, while this has reached such a level without... the essence of this, which no one has never says, it was putin's decision to decapitate the oligarchy. that's why the west hates him. besides that, they say he also made the oligarchs cooperate, work for themselves, and not for someone from the outside. of course, over time, the russian economy recovered, life expectancy increased, alcoholism levels dropped, the country became beautiful, the oligarchy did not serve from the beginning. an unusually sick person who manages to say so much and such things that one wonders if he ever went anywhere studied, this is to some. he also, by the way, sings with panin, this is a sad song, the onset of routine in family relationships, therefore it is also bad to clean up, alora, as the italians say in such cases, here of course genri tegranych will immed

can this be considered in some way that ukraine is trying to enlist the support of great britain, andhow much these bilateral negotiations are now, perhaps, even more important than the multilateral ones within the framework. please, look, these are very correct steps, but there is one point, that is, the level of ministers, or our president and prime minister, this is not enough, because in britain, france, germany, sweden, norway, denmark, poland, even the same ones, should be without fail, representatives of the cabinet, politicians, deputies, public activists. all those who at what level decisions are made and perceived and any decision-making is supported, because the highest level of the highest level of the meeting is all good, that is, meeting before the summit in... this is all wonderful, but this is not enough, because in addition to the agreement, there is there is still a lot of, firstly, a draft work, b- public work, in political work at different levels, and then the final decision is made, and don't forget that every prime minister or every president relies on the opini

can this be considered in a way that... the country is trying to enlist the support of great britain, and as far as these bilateral negotiations are now, perhaps even more important than multilateral ones within the framework of the g7 or nato and so on and so forth. please see, these are very correct steps, but there is one point, that is, the level of ministers or our president and prime minister is not enough, because in britain, france, the ranks, in sweden, norway, denmark, in poland even the same ones, should be without fail, representatives of the cabinet, politicians, deputies, public activists, all those who are on why are decisions made and perceived and resisted at all levels ? because the highest, highest level meeting is all good, that is, meeting before the summit in gaz, that is all wonderful, but that is not enough, because in addition to agreements, there is a lot going on, firstly... a draft work, b- public work, c - political work at different levels of work, and then the final decision is made, and don't forget that every prime minister or every president relies on

, this week, britain has sanctioned the two of the... senior um israeli ministers, personal sanctions on them uh, as i said before, we we voted for an immediate cease fire sessation in gaza and immediate restoration of food supplies at the united nations. now uh, the british, the british establishment is, i think my sense is that there is a definite swing uh, as the the conflict with the with the people of gaza is so utterly one-sided, so vicious and so cruel by the israelis, this is having its effect uh in london, absolutely clear, even the the treasury, the money people this week announced a cut back in the funding for the foreign office, that is to say that you know the british diplomatic service, because they're obviously pushing back uh the the people people are some of the people in london are pushing back and saying no, we've had massive as i'm sure you've seen martia demonstrat. right across london, this filters through, it does actually filter through, believe it or not, to the to whitehall and to people in london, i think even the... have been looking at this, some of the mi

king charles ii of great britain. in atava, he spoke at the meeting of the new canadian parliament, opening its first session. usually, the first session of parliament is opened by the governor general of canada. charles ii will be the second monarch to open a session. canadian parliament. earlier in atava, the queen twice gave such a speech elizabeth ii. in 1957 in 1977. most observers saw the current royal visit as a joint gesture from london and ottawa to us president donald trump, who continues to insist that canada should join the united states as the 51st state. the overwhelming majority of canadians oppose this, and the british monarch supports her former subjects in this. it is worth recalling that charles ii is the formal head of state in canada, which is part of the commonwealth as a former british dominion. former romanian presidential candidate callin georgescu has announced that he is leaving politics, saying that the country's exaggerated political struggles have led to deprofessionalization. georgescu i

, when i suggest burning britain, everyone is outraged.e, i interpret its role in this story as you know, like an old dog that drives the herd into a stall, it runs around in circles and there , come on ... here now i will make 15-125 submarines, nuclear, non-nuclear, i will do all this, you should do it too, and you see, i helped ukraine, you should do it too, this is the role of britain, it is traditional. there is a plant, and i would look at what relatively new progressive companies, what they do and how they do it, you should not underestimate the enemy, no one cares about it, it is very dangerous to underestimate the enemy, especially. in the era of qualitative change in military technologies and war in general and war in general, well, and for them , of course, it becomes the industry that it can also help the economy very seriously, and this is such a situation, well, here is a little zukzwang, they understand that of course the united states and other more profitable markets, they are sucking out this industry, it will be sucked o

what's going on the ground when we were based in britain, we ignored it. it says stop by and by 6 and the secret service personnel, how totalitarian? yeah, is a guessing there except for this week success of your a case where the judge ruled the unlawful. how. how do i tell the terry and is it getting an in the coverage of gaza and you know, just taking a look, step sub to change and how the pulling as it being though in the past couple of years. yeah, i mean it's, it's terrible. the media has been complicit really with the genocide goes, absolutely. you know, by constantly having on is really official spokes people to really power the effect can be a holocaust denial live where by the side. oh, well, you know, people are in the dining and goes up because of how mass is going, i think to do with us. and you know, there's no salvation. it goes all of these kinds of lies. and that, you know, then putting out this kind of soft questioning of them and challenging them a little bit. but really ultimately the genocide to know line by these riley as spud's people

the review says it remains the bedrock of britain's defenses.se the stronger protection of undersea pipes and cables, tickle to sustain our way of life. the government says this review is the first in decades to avoid further cuts to the size of the armed forces. this graph shows the recent decline of the regular army, from more than 100,000 in 2010 to now just over 70,000. the review recommends that there should now be an increase in their number. the head of the armed forces says britain's defenses will be stronger. >> days like today are really important. they reflect the importance of defense for the whole nation, they reflect the ambition in defense and they reflect the certainty about good jobs in the future and a british defense that is getting stronger. >> the government has already committed to increased defense spending to 2.5 percent of gdp by 2027. it talks of an ambition to spend 3% sometime in the 20 30's, after the next election. the review says it may be necessary to increase that faster. this map shows other allies are already d

tony ben who took me under his wing, he's the best prime minister britain never had, and i was with him from the age of 19, my me at 19 until his funeral, more than a decade ago, now he's sorely missed, he was the great domestic influence on my life. though of course he strongly opposed imperialism everywhere, so these two men, one i knew in person, the other only on a poster, although i subsequently met his children in cuba and we interviewed them in london also, uh, these were the two, if you like, formative figures in my life, right, interesting, and how did you role later on as general secretary of war? how did it prepare you for your later political career? well it took me around the world uh for a start uh until then i came from a poor household in a poor industrial city, the fartest i ever went was ireland uh because of my family connection there and suddenly i'm in africa, suddenly i'm in asia in the middle east uh suddenly i'm uh... acting on events in the world and advocating for causes with the experience of having been there, so the eritrean ethiopian conflict, for example,

proud of this and calls for further such steps, boris johnson, the former prime minister of great britain now returning, as i understand it, is planning to return, wants to return to big politics, he came out with an article in the daily mail on saturday, where, therefore, he spoke about what is right. he says, well, we destroyed , for example, russian planes, yes, but they could have attacked great britain, normal logic, yes, your planes or submarines can attack russia, in this regard we can already hit, so, well, accordingly, polo, and i imagine the face of boris johnson, how this, this is ours, yes, no, you are ours, please, do not touch, and he calmly says, we need to support, welcome these acts of sabotage against the russian. the federation calmly openly writes about this, telling such terrible passions about russians, about russia, for example, he reported there that the russians castrate ukrainian men so that ukrainian children are not born, i 'm not joking, it was written in the daily mail, ethnic ukrainians present here, keep in mind, it turns out that there is such a threat of

britain, i think, has lost a lot of influence in the world, quite a lot of economic power. and now in many european countries it is perceived as a mixture of contempt, amusement, and embarrassment. western powers are subordinate to the united states, including france. unfortunately, neither the french nor the germans know how to resist the americans. and what's interesting is that the united states is revolutionary, they want to undermine every government in the world. not because the president of the united states wants to do it. america itself is determined to undermine. every other government, despite this, the americans have allies. everything we've seen in the last 25 years, the invasion of afghanistan in 2001, iraq is a disaster, libya is a disaster, syria is a disaster. their problem is that they have no skill in governing the peoples that they invade. they can to rule only by destroying. remember how the anglo-saxons conquered america, they raided indian tribes, erected lonely forts in the middle of the lands, when this option did not work, they destroyed the indian