but hamas won't give up power. so i should say of course the bbc did address this question of its reporting and rejects any statements that it denied any sort of incident that happened on the ground there. but i also want to say... blamed israel, but ok. international humanitarian law also requires that an occupying power was responsible for the food and well-being of the civilian population, not of hamas on the ground. so chris i want to bring you on this as well. what you make of the fact that the us is standing behind israel here in rejecting this resolution? right i was muted, there we go. even after co. vid, unmute. they got their wish, 14 to one with the united states standing solely against the entire world and the un security council when it came to the humanitarian crisis that is happened in palestine. there is no denying that people are dying. and when you turn your back on this, any former... that deals with it is an insult to people, it's a dark stain on our nation's history with what is going forward r

and making hamas the issue is gives cover to netanyahu, because his war is not against hamas, his war is against the palestinian people, and the idea of an independent, self-determined palestinian state, so when i talk to officials from hamas, islamic jihad doesn't participate in any elections that are organized by what they consider to be a collaboration. elections in in 2006, these were free democratic elections and hamas didn't just win them in gaza, they won them throughout all of the palestinian territories. ismael hania was supposed to be the prime minister of palestine, of course last summer israel assassinated khaniah in tehran, but the point that i'm getting at here is that hamas is saying if the issue is our governance, we don't need to be the government of gaza. in fact, i i've heard from hamas officials to say, it's it's an albatross around our neck to be uh, charge of the government of gaza, we have to meet payroll, we have to pick up the trash. prior to october 7th, hamas's popularity as a governing authority was going down, and if you read public opinion polls, palestin

hamas presents detailed political endgame. basasem naim, a member of the hamas political bureau, has said the us framework doesn't respond to any of the palestinian people's demands. naim said the new proposal provided. guarantees neither for a 60-day cease fire and the transportation of humanitarian aid into gaza, nor for an end to the war, a permanent cease fire or the withdrawal of the israeli army. the essence of the israeli response is the perpetuation of occupation and the continuation of death and famin even during a temporary cease fire. this proposal fails to address any of our people's demands, foremost among them ending the war and famon. although the proposal failed to meet hamas demands, the group responded in a positive. and responsible way, the us side, however, deplored the hamas response with witkov saying on his social media account later that it is totally unacceptable and only takes us backward. hours after ritkov's remark, israel's minister for military affairs said he has ordered the army to push ahead wi

and making hamas the issue is gives cover to netanyahu, because his war is not against hamas, his war is against the palestinian people, and the idea of an independent, self-determined palestinian state, so when i talk to official. from hamas, islamic jihad doesn't participate in any elections that are organized by what they consider to be a collaborationist regime of mahmoud abbas and the palestinian authority, but they still remain a very central part the fabric of palestinian politics, but hamas made a decision to engage in electoral politics and they won the elections in in 2006, these were free democratic elections and hamas didn't just win them in gaza, they won them throughout all of the palestinian territories. ism khania was supposed to be the... prime minister of palestine, of course, last summer israel assassinated khania uh in tehran, but the point that i'm getting at here is that hamas is saying if the issue is our governance, we don't need to be the government of gaza. in fact, i've i've heard from hamas officials to say, it's it's an albatross around our neck to be uh,

hamas attacks this year. this multi -billion dollar smart fence, equipped with radar , cctv cameras and surveillance drones , failed to detect an attack that had been planned and practiced for years. this is exactly one of the reasons for the october 7th incident. a catastrophic defeat for a regime that claimed military superiority. the resistance forces showed the world that the claims of this regime are very weak and baseless. this disgrace. it ended up being very heavy and expensive for the leaders of the zionist regime. let's go to meet israel zeev , a former israeli general and former commander of the food zone. he was in charge of the israeli army. he was in the area that day and we want to hear the story from his own words. yes, i am a soldier, so i picked up my gun and went there to see what i could do . what do you think happened to the zionist regime on october 7 ? everything collapsed. i think israel went too far and relied too much on technology and thought that in areas like gaza , it would be ea

the us first got israel to sign off on this deal, and then it passed it over to hamas, and hamas was not happy with the result. so it came back with something that was neither an explicit rejection or a clear acceptance. it was an acceptance, for example, of the number of hostages that would be released, so some of the terms. but then it requested amendments - amendments that were actually on issues that are very controversial or about which there are core disagreements, especially the longstanding demand that there be guarantees that the ceasefire last until an agreement can be reached for a permanent end to the war, and also that the israelis fully withdraw from the gaza strip. those things are not in the offer on the table, and israel said that hamas had rejected the proposal. and the tone of mr witkoff's response suggests that there isn't room for amendments. he said that this was totally unacceptable, that this was a step backwards, and that hamas should accept this framework and get on with the ceasefire and get on with those talks about trying to reach a permanent end of the w

hamas presents detailed political end game. bosam naim, a member of the hamas political bureau, has said the us framework doesn't respond to any of the palestinian people's demands. naim said the new proposal provided guarantees neither for 60-day cease fire and the transportation of humanitarian aid into gaza, nor for an end to the war, a permanent cease fire or the withdrawal of the israeli army. the essence of the israeli response is the perpetuation of occupation and the continuation of death and famine even during a temporary cease fire. this proposal. fails to address any of our people's demands, foremost among them ending the war and famon. although the proposal failed to meet hamas demands, the group responded in a positive and responsible way. the us side, however, deplored the hamas response with witkov saying on his social media account later that it is totally unacceptable and only takes us backward. hours after ritkov's remark, israel's minister for military affairs said he has ordered the army to push ahead with i

hamas counteroffer. the first difference is wouldkov propos a 60- days fire while hamas wants guarantees to a deal that would lead to permanent cease fire. second is the captives release. whitkov asked for batches of captives for temporary pauses like the failed 2023 deal, while hamas demands gradual releases only if israel fully withdraws from the gaza territory. learning from past betrays, hamas wants no more open-ended pauses. on humanitarian aid and reconstruction. vitkov proposed israel control the aid flow like the current starvation siege while hamas asked for a three to five-year rebuilding plan without this gaza states in israel's chokehold, and on military withdrawal, the true colonial spirit shows its head. witkov proposed the gradual withdrawal of israeli soldiers north than south, but hamas demands a full and immediate withdrawal from day one. hamas won't repeat past mistakes where cease fires became cover for reoccupation. on the post war gaza plans. witkop was wake on governance with us qa

meanwhile, hamas demands guarantees the genocide against palestinians won't continue. take a look at the critical gaps between the us mediated whitkov plan and the hamas counter offer. the first difference is whitkov proposed a 60-day ceasefire, while hamas wants guarantees to a deal that would lead to permanent ceasefire. second is the captive's release. whitkov asks for batches of captives for temporary pauses like the failed 2023 deal, while hamas demands gradual releases only if israel fully withdraws from the gaza territory. learning from past betrays, hamas wants no more. and ended pauses on humanitarian aid and reconstruction, whitkov proposed israel control the aid flow like the current starvation siege, while hamas asked for a three to five year rebuilding plan, without this gaza stays in israel's chokehold, and on military withdrawal, the true colonial spirit shows its head. witkov proposed the gradual withdrawal of israeli soldiers north than south, but hamas demands a full and immediate withdrawal from day one. hamas won't repeat past mistakes where seesfir

hamas presents detailed political end game. basasem naim, a member of the hamas political bureau has said the u.s. framework doesn't respond to any of the palestinian people's demands. naim said the new proposal provided guarantees neither for a 60-day cease fire and the transportation of humanitarian aid into gaza, nor for an end to the war, a permanent cease fire or the withdrawal of the israeli army. the essence of the israeli response is the perpetuation of occupation. and the continuation of death and famin even during a temporary cease fire. this proposal fails to address any of our people's demands, foremost among them ending the war and famon. although the proposal failed to meet hamas demands, the group responded in a positive and responsible way. the us side, however, deplored the hamas response with witkov saying on his social media account later that it is totally unacceptable and only takes us backwards. hours after witkov's remark, israel's minister for military. said he has ordered the army to push ahead with its

call for hamas to disarm and leave gaza. there were 14 other countries who voted in favor of the resolution. after the vote various members including representatives from united kingdom, china, russia and france discussed why they disagreed with the veto. [inaudible conversations] >> than 9929th meeting of the security council is called to order. i should like to take this opportunity toi pay tribute on behalf of the council, his excellency, permit prep of greece come for his service as president of the council. i'm sure i speak for all members of the council and expressing deep appreciation to the ambassador and his team for the great automatic skill with which they conducted the council's business last month. the provisional agenda for this meeting is the situation in the middle east, including the palestinian question. the agenda is adopted. in accordance with the rules i invite the representatives of israel and yemen to participate in this meeting. it is so decided. i propose that the council and and you -- to participat

, so hamas is the problem and not israel, israel want to to finish this this war, and if hamas will will surrender and give us our ostages, the war can be stopped right now, so i think... that we don't want to kill babies and women, i think that israel should uh define a a a special zone for them of humanitarian aid and to to keep fighting hamas until hamas will will be surrounder. do you are you in favor potentially of israel committing to a permanent end? to the war in gaza, if that is the price that hamas is placing on a ceasefire agreement, getting your son back home. no, of course not, i want my son right now, okay, right now, but i understand that i'm a part of this state, and israel cannot allow the hamas regime to stay in our border, okay, so hamas should be destroyed, should... go away to uh to another country, but they cannot stay here, we don't have anything with with the with the arab civilians in gaza, but we we do have with hamas, hamas could not stay in gaza, speak more there, whose son atan is one of the 50 hostages still being held in gaza, well let's get the view from i

hamas won't repeat past mistakes where cease fires became cover for reoccupation. on the post war gaza plans, whitkov was wake on governance with us qatar overside. while hamas asked for technocratic administration and independent governance for five to seven years, hamas presents detailed political end game. bosam naim, a member of the hamas political bureau, has said the us framework doesn't respond to any of the palestinian people's demands. naim said the new proposal provided guarantees neither for 60-day cease fire and the transportation of humanitarian aid into gaza, nor for an end to the war, a permanent cease fire or the withdraw of the israeli army. the essence of the israeli response is the perpetuation of occupation and the continuation of death and famin even during a temporary cease fire. this proposal fails to address any of our people's demands, foremost. them ending the war and famon. although the proposal failed to meet hamas demands, the group responded in a positive and responsible way. the us side, however, deplored the hamas response with witko

hamas, gaza cease fire demands.

ambassador said the resolution, which was introduced, failed to condemn hamas and did not call for hamas to disarm gaza. there were 14 other countries that voted in favor of the resolution. after the vote, various members, including representatives from the united kingdom, russia, china, and france, discussed why they disagreed with the details. >> the 900 979 meeting of the security council is called to order. i should like to take this opportunity to pay tribute on behalf of the council, his excellency, the secretary, permanent representative of greece, for his service as representative of the council. i'm sure i speak for all members of the council in expressing deep appreciation to the ambassador and his team for the great diplomatic skill with which they conducted the council's business last month. the provision agenda for this meeting is the situation in the middle east, including the palestinian question. the agenda is adopted. i invite the representatives of israel and yemen to participate in the meeting. it is so decided. i propose that the council and by the permanent observer

learning from past betrayals, hamas wants no more open-ended pauses. on humanitarian aid and reconstruction. witkov proposed israel control the aid flow like the current starvation siege, while hamas asked for a three to five. year rebuilding plan without this gaza stays in israel's chokehold, and on military withdrawal, the true colonial spirit shows its head. witkov proposed the gradual withdraw of israeli soldiers north than south, but hamas demands a full and immediate withdrawal from day one. hamas won't repeat past mistakes where cease fires became cover for reoccupation. on the post war gaza plans, whitcop was weak on governance with us katar overside, while hamas asked for technocratic administration. any of the palestinian people's demands. naim said the new proposal provided guarantees neither for a 60- day fire and the transportation of humanitarian aid into gaza, nor for an end to the war, a permanent cease fire, or the withdrawal of the israeli army. the essence of the israeli response is the perpetuation of occupation and the continuation

so this occupation of gaza on the one hand and the card of power that hamas is losing , but hamas and the resistance groups in gaza , it's not just a matter of holding prisoners as a form of power. they are now conducting military operations . the operations that were carried out in the past few days, especially today, they say, five military operations . the casualties of the elite forces or the zionist regime's army , which they are promoting a lot , were very heavy in the past few days, especially today in khan yunis and jabalia. for example, the fighters of this resistance in gaza bombed buildings and several elite soldiers of the regime's army were killed and wounded in ambushes there . their casualties were very high. now, there is news in the hebrew media that the number of the casualties are rising , so it shows that there is still an epic in gaza . it is an epic that despite all this siege of gaza, pressure and long war. again , the power of struggle and resistance still exists. for 600 days, these people have been under the most severe attacks. perhaps we can say that it is

after all, it was hamas who started this brutal conflict on october 7th, 2023, when hamas perpetratedil still refuse to acknowledge that hamas could end this conflict tomorrow by surrendering and laying down its arms. it is unconstionable that the un still has not labeled and sanctioned hamas as a terrorist organization. in addition to refusing once again to condemn hamas for the cowardly and evil acts that set this brutal conflict into motion. this resolution contains other serious defects. the united states has taken the very clear position since this conflict began, that israel has a right to defend itself, which... includes defeating hamas and ensuring they are never again in a position to threaten israel. in this regard, any product that undermines our close ally israel's security is a non-starter. this resolution would undermine diplomatic efforts to reach a ceasefire that reflects the realities on the ground and emboldens hamas. this resolution also draws false equivalents between israel and hamas. which is both wrong and dangerous. this resolution seeks an, and i quote, immedi

not call for hamas to disarm gaza. in recent months, hamas has rejected numerous cease-fire proposals, including one over the weekend, that would provide a pathway to end this conflict and release the remaining 58 hostages. we cannot allow the security council to reward hamas's intransigence, after all, it was hamas who started his brutal conflict on october 7, 2023, when hamas perpetrated the worst massacre of jews since the holocaust. hamas has sustained in a percent in a manner that threatens real sick security and prolongs palestinian anguish. it is hamas that continues to threaten israelis and post-palestinian civilians in gaza in harm's way every day, using them as human shields. they have brutally suppressed those brave enough to challenge its goal. inexplicable that many members of this council still refused to acknowledge that hamas could end this conflict tomorrow by surrendering and laying down its arms. it is unconscionable that the u.n. still has not labeled and sanction hamas as a terrorist organization.

hamas did not agree. and in a situation where the regime reiterated the escalation of the war in gaza , the jabaliya and shujaiya operations, which resulted in the killing of four zionist officers, both revived hopes in the resistance and increased doubts about the continuation of the fruitless war in gaza. a network of explosives was discovered at the site of the operation. in addition to the existence of a tunnel, it is estimated that the perpetrators of this operation detonated the network of explosives. they then retreated through the tunnel. i believe that through this operation we can see a change in the style of hamas fighters in the week. and we can see in recent months. they manage to infiltrate and pursue israeli soldiers through individual channels and wage guerrilla warfare with them. hundreds of tunnels have been found in this area. these tunnels lead to residential areas. where their hideouts are. they come out of their hideouts to carry out attacks and then immediately go there. this shows

political operation, and basam naim, and those two officials from hamas were the lead people meeting with american officials when direct talks. happened in february with adam bowler who was um donald trump's special envoy on hostages, but he's also a former college roommate of jared kuschner, a close friend of the trump family, and we we got a little taste of what happens when hamas is allowed to speak for itself without israel uh being in charge of the narrative, adam bowler came out of those discussions and and took a lot of heat from the israelis because he he said, they don't have horns growing out of their heads, and he implied that these are people that were very different. than what he'd been led to believe, and hamas people told me that bowler kept saying that to them, you're so different than what i had been led to believe you would be. you, this is why hamas believes that israel is constantly assassinating political leaders that would be capable of representing their view of history, their perspective of the issues. you know, hamas is, and and it gets very little attention,

well, hamas, how can you... differentiate hamas from the palestinian people now, because hamas is the majority of the palestinian people, that they would remain in resistance, but not in power, so who said that hamas wanted to to be in power, who said wanted to control or to to deal or to lead politically, hamas is a resistance group, the same as hizballah, hizballah when it started as a resistance group in the 80s were you know didn't go into political you know roles inside lebanon. till 2003, so who said that resistance groups are after power or political role in inside their countries? there are resistance, so resistance are above all these things and are not working to to achieve any political position or to to control the country, their role is totally different than being a politician a fight a freedom fighter if i want to mention just give you expos a symbol, chigavara was was was in power in cuba, he was a minister of finance or maybe, he was a minister of maybe, i don't know, but he was a minister in the cabinet of castro, and he left to lead another revolution, you know, thi

also we understand that was a high-level meeting between the qataris and hamas but what hamas is saying is it is all just intensifying discussion, no deal on the table, they said we are ready to cooperate with any deal in the war and allow more humanitarian aid into gaza. what is the main sticking point as ever, the demands from hamas for a ceasefire to lead to a permanent end to the war? but that is still resisted on the far right of the israeli cabinet. i think the main point for hamas is they want any ceasefire to lead to a long-term ceasefire. they want to end the war and for israel to withdraw its forces from gaza. more than 45% of the land in gaza has been under israeli control, maybe more. the gaza strip is all the time receiving an evacuation order. hamas wants a guarantee from the mediators and the americans that israel would end the war after the temporary ceasefire. they are not rejecting the idea of having a 60 day ceasefire, the steve witkoff offer. they rejected the offer because they said there was not enough guarantee from the mediators that the war would end after 60 da

l'organisation accuse le hamas.ôté, le hamas a qualifié la fondation de "machine ignoble" au service de l'armée israélienne. notre correspondant stéphane amar est à jérusalem. en afrique du sud, les secouristes mènent une course contre la montre pour tenter de retrouver des survivants après des inondations en début de semaine dans la province du cap-oriental du pays. le bilan provisoire est de 57 morts. le fait du jour est consacré à l'enquête du collectif de journalistes forbidden stories qui révèle que les paramilitaires russes de wagner ont "kidnappé et détenu des centaines de civils au mali". le journaliste et enquêteur guillaume vénétitay sera avec nous. economie: laura cambaud revient sur le groupe boeing après le crash d'air india. 19h10, le débat consacré au proche-orient et à la diplomatie, à quelques jours du déplacement à new york d'emmanuel macron. la solution à 2 etats est-elle crédible aujourd'hui? quelle est la position de la france? que peut-on attendre de la conférence de new york à l'onu, la semain

hamas must be dealt with effectively and realistically. it will be a perpetual war and running away from an agreement that will end the war is not in our interest. we must find another way and running away from an agreement that will end the war is not in our interest. if we say no to the ceasefire, if we fight, the world will surround us. even if hamas is forced to leave gaza, it will be a great victory for them. pansion ashel. eventually this hell in gaza will end. the gaza strip will be opened up to the world. international artists will come and produce and produce films about war and destruction everywhere . painters will create works of art and books about gaza. will be published and in that situation the israelis will be ashamed to show their faces to the world. now that there is no excuse for the destruction of the people of gaza. among all the internal crises of the regime, a new crisis has recently not only heated up but also attracted special attention. the slippers crisis. but what is the story of this crisis? these days, netany

they put the bone in the grunt of hamas but hamas replied and said that changes were mentioned to steve witkoff so both of them in a stand-up by the result is there is no deal and the misery of people carrying on because you when said the main police or the highest place of famine oliver the world is in gaza, about 100% facing famine. as always, thank you very much for your insight. here, the government is going to spend £1.5 billion on building six new weapons factories. defence secretary john healey was shown a storm shadow missile on an assembly line at a factory in stevenage on saturday. he said the new factories would "better deter our adversaries". the ministry of defence said the factories will create more than 1,000 new jobs. the uk will also purchase more than 7,000 british-built long-range weapons, including drones and missiles, over several years. the move is part of the government's strategic defence review, which is due to be published on monday. and if you're in the uk, the defence secretary john healey will be joining laura kuenssberg on bbc one from 9:00 this morning. ju

a particular clan based in southern gaza, the gang which presents itself as an opposition force to hamasfrom romalaw, and we also have political analyst john stepling who's with us from inderoe, norway. gentlemen, welcome to the program. let's start off with mr. stepling, uh, sir, the news had been circulating for a few days now, but what was your reaction to benjamin netanyahu publicly acknowledging that the israeli regime was arming criminal gangs in gaza to quote unquote fight hamas? well, nothing surprises me at this point. um, and it's another example of this this strange policy or or be the strange behavior, if you will, of israeli of... officials in general, whether the're politicians or or military personnel or rabbies or anybody that they openly admit and brag about their war crimes. uh, it's the same as the idf making tic tock videos mocking the suffering of the palestinians. these are kind of unheard of uh, this unheard of behavior by by um any state that i can think of uh for a very long time. it's it's uh, it's as i say though, not somehow surprising. also, israel has a... h

if we just view how hamas's position have been. changing throughout time, it's obvious that hamas isand not abiding by the american or not enough pressure from the american side, most probably the hebrew media indicated that the israeli and will increase the military pressure on hamas, you believe that they will succeed in forcing hamas to abondon its condition like stopping the war and israel's withdrawal from the strip, it's all about maintaining the narrative, it's not hamas that's continuing the war, it's israel that's continuing the war, so now speaking about going towards more escalation, it's on, i think that it's not more escalation as a matter of fact, it's the continuation of the escalation, what's happening inside of gaza, succeed in forcing hamas? i don't think so, because as long as israel reached it speak, now everything that's happening inside of gaza, no matter how much escalation there is, hamas could... stay after israel the peak, so i don't think that moving, moving forward can change hamas and this resilience and resistance is the major cause for israel's isolatio

. in the frontline, saying hamas, they want to get rid of hamas and destroy hamas, but can't they see that they will not destroy resistance, we're also looking at operations, joint operations between al-qutz brigades and al-qassan brigades, you have alqs brigades really, i mean conducting a very qualitative operation in the last week and we saw the videos come out of that, you think islamic jihad will be at the forefront of resistance in the upcoming uh phase, especially if hamas accepted a cease fire, went for a cease fire and accepted maybe the palestinian authority to take overhazza and maybe they just maybe took a break for now and you have other resistance we could talk about that before the israeli american aggression against iran and what what's the outcome was the result of iranian big victorious big victory against those aggressors now we are talking about hamas we are talking about jihad islamic jihad. let me tell you this, in gaza hamas is the strong hole of the resistance in the hand of hamas and we know hamas retaliate in 2021, saif al quds because what was going on in sh

look, hamas cannot help, the the humanitarian aid, okay, the hamas must be must be destroyed by israel, israel must achieve its war goals to destroy hamas and to and to release its hostages and i think that the solution has to be by define a area zone of humanitarian aid for the civilians, we have to separate the civilians from hamas terrorists, and to say to all gaza civilians, you have you have opportunity to get food, to get water, whatever you want, but you have to go to this area, and if someone chooses to stay in the combat zones, so he is um, is saying that is from, so if he is from us, he will be die, okay, so we don't want to to kill babies and women, i understand what you are saying, and i also we have a slight interference on your line uh, but at the moment the aid distribution is how you describe it with these these points being set up in the south of gaza and having to cross combat zones, get to the distribution points and many of them are being killed at the aid distribution points. i understand how you what your your the depth of your feeling against hamas, but when you

demonstrations in support of hamas .n special rapporteur, francescanze, announced that he was concerned about the heavy police intervention in protests in support of palestine. the american university is terrified . from arizona to indiana and george mason and other places, the zionist lobby has also sent its supporters to the field. despite this amount of violence, the protests are spreading. they are eliminating some and appointing others. can't you expect people who have been oppressed for 75 years to sit in their rooms and write poetry and not defend themselves? i think israel has the right to defend itself. it should do so. the oppression of the supporters of the zionist regime continues. you are killing the jews. you support genocide. students shared images from gaza in their protests. they killed a public of thousands and warned about the crimes of the zionist regime against civilians . i can still hear their cries, israel , saying, "death to you and your kind." students stood up to the propaganda of the western m

now, why did hamas do this? well, because of the pressure that the israelis are putting on the people of gaza , there is a siege on gaza . when the pressure and the strictures increase , hamas uses this tool to reduce this pressure. and it was said that if it did not do this, it would have taken the lead, which it would not have done . there is another operational plan, such as the big discussions that were raised about the abraham accords and the deal of the century, and so on. but generally, hamas' attacks were within this framework . when the pressure increased , it would launch an attack. this would create a balance, for example, it would cut off the electricity. and these are netanyahu 's personal reasons, the reason that is said to be that if he wanted his term to end , he should step down from the post of prime minister, he should be tried. one reason was that netanyahu tried to make this issue seem a bit bigger than it was and wanted to propose a plan called the goal of destroying hamas , well, less than

hamas has islam the regime for systematically targeting journalists to silence them. the group also urged the international community to take prompt action to protect. media workers, meanwhile, air strikes continue in other areas, in the north, two palestinians were killed in asl neighborhood east of baylahya, while three others were found that unter the debris in beer al-naja near jabalie refugee camp, since october 2023, the us-israeli genocidal war has claimed over 54,600 palestinian lives and wounded nearly 125,350 hunters. yemen's armed forces have carried out a fresh anti-israel missile operation targeting mungurian airport in support of the palestinian people in gaza. the missile force of the yemani armed forces carried out a military operation targeting lod airport in the occupied area of yafa using a palestine two. hypersonic ballistic missile. sar added that the operation successfully achieved its goal, forcing millions of occupying zionists to flee to shelters and halting air traffic at the airport. he said the operation was in retaliation for the israeli w

in a managed manner is because hamas is anticipating a long-term war. it has the capability and wants to maintain its military capabilities for a long-term and peaceful war against the zionist regime, but the reality is that a significant part of the hamas organization's structure, which was damaged during the last war , has been restored. hamas has been able to restore its human resources structure , has been able to recruit new members , and by using the facilities it has and the weapons and ammunition it already has or even the ammunition and weapons it has captured from the enemy, especially the inoperative ammunition, it has been able to conduct significant and effective operations against the zionist enemy. design and implement. mr. zaran , we have already had in the news that there were petitions both within the israeli army itself and in various parts of the occupied territories to stop the war and to restart the exchange of zionist prisoners. these petitions were signed. it can be said that netanyahu was almost indifferent . yesterday, avi dovi

beniamin netanyahu has publicly acknowledged that the regime is arming criminal gangs in gaza to fight hamas. the remark follows reports by israely media that the premier had authorized the army of some 100 members of a particular clan based in southern gaza, the gang which presents itself as an opposition force to hamas stands accused of plundering humanitarian aid and contributing to the israeli campaign of starving of palestinians. the israeli regime has a history of supporting terrorists in the region during the syria war. "the regime supported al-qaeda groups and trained and armed them in the occupied gouan heights. israel has also been accused of supporting daish terrorists in syria and iraq. to discuss those issues and more, we're joined uh by professor of political science at birzaid university, mr. sadnim, who's with us from romalaw, and uh, we also have political analyst john stepling, who's with us from inderoy, norway. gentlemen, welcome to the program. let's start off..." with mr. stepling uh, sir, the news had been circulating for a few days now, but what was your reaction to b