the teetsy fly in numerous african countries, the fruit fly in canada, improving cancer diagnosis, niger, mali, and zambia, and the central american republic. these are the kinds of programs they are involved. once in a while there may be a project such as in iran or syria that may provide a small amount of useful experience in general nuclear science and radiology. but the most important part is to the extent that some of these programs are about enhancing safety. the u.s. is totally free on the board to vote against those projects at the board of governors and does so. the u.s. already denies extra budgetary funding for technical cooperation projects for state sponsors of terrorism. which the countries, the yeal mentioned, are -- the gentlelady mentioned, are, however the propossed amendment mandates the withholding not of the voluntary contributions, not of the extra budgetary support, but of the u.s. regular dues to the iaea. so what does it do? it hampers the agency's primary function which is the inspecting and safeguarding of nuclear material in foreign countries. this is cutting