they are stossel for the deaths of people in iraq and which not but the lights go out that it -- >> i am grateful for the interest you've taken in these issues for many years. sometimes in this house, we should have the ability to accept the fact that we have people outside this house who can contribute to an impartial review as to what happened in iraq both in the run-up in the reconstruction that has taken place afterward. when people look at the list of names before them, they will take the view that this is not only a very responsible group of people, but one that can conduct the review with great efficiency and with great care. i also agree we must have the power to be able to listen all voices that may have something to say to them, but that is a matter for the review itself. >> as a declared skeptic as early as november 1992 of the existence of these weapons of mass destruction and the subsequent opponent of the invasion of iraq, may i put it to the prime minister that the disastrous effect of the war has been to make iran the dominant power in the whole of the middle east. wha