our rear yards ajoin. i have lived in my property for many years and i tend to return there. i'm upset about the designs and i request that you reduce the height and overall size. the height of the existing of 309 is 20 feet above eureka street. while their proposal is 36.25 feet tall. it increases the depth of their building about 18 feet and of more concern, adds a large volume of space to the rear. this will cover over my rear yard south facing room and deck, which you can see in the photo. instead of being able to see the sky and the roofscapes of other houses, i will be be looking at a large blocking mass. the proposed 309 would have a similar effect on my next door's neighbors. several neighbors have presented a scheme that will provide them with many of the features that are present in their current proposal but will have much less impact on the size available to the properties to the north. these schemes take advantage of the natural slope of the block to reduce the height of 309 and nevertheless put its lower level below the elevation of my rear yard. this makes sens

our rear yards ajoin. i have lived in my property for many years and i tend to return there. i'm upset about the designs and i request that you reduce the height and overall size. the height of the existing of the height of the existing of 309 is 20 feet above eureka

for more on whathis ity al mea, i ajoined by the former u.s. amssad to israel and now frothe rookings institution. what willhe pple make of it? that is very goodqueson. we have seen in thast, fo times now, that they have made the deal and it has broken apart again. i tnk theeopl whoave prsed rhisillelcomet appeared tt is mor factor dring the deal. the otherain ctor is that headqrter hahanged its tune. th fear that th're losing position and he seemto b moving out of th iranian- syrianamp to the egyptn camp. that is leang h to try to fi a me solid base then the ve uncertain situation in mascus. it is part ofhe much broader tuoil in the region. >> let's talk aut what it means f iael. weave had a tepid response fr the white house tay. but we had a vehement negive reaction tit from prime minister netanya in ldon, saying that it w a big cry for terrorism. was he right >> let's put it thisay. mas is a terrorist organization. it is on theist of u.s terrort ornizations. e of its leaders embraced osa bin laden gue it as a rrior andondeed the u.s. llingof