they could go from pg&e energy which is 16% renewable to 100% grenoble with clean power and for that customer household it would be $7 per month. that is 25 cents per day. many san franciscans -- this represents 43% of all households and that would allow them to enjoy that opportunity of choice. tier 2 is $16 additional. you can see the dollar's per month or cents per day make it affordable to go to that 100% screen option -- green option. this is a chart you have asked me to do in the past when we have looked at water and sewer. i would like to walk you through this. it is telling for what the household budget or the family purse can afford. if a customer were to continue to participate in the clean power sf program, they would have a family budget between tier one to tier five. an average cost of $20 per month. less than $1 to said that they have clean energy. that is in addition. they will get the bill from pg&e and it will be a combined for gas and electric and continue to get the generation component of 100% renewable. it would be 70 cents per day in order to continue to be in o

the people that are helping develop a small grenoble's. in the entire hetch hetchy power enterprise, this has 75 to 80 employees that are funded and on average hired during the year. that equates to $1 million, about seven peoples costs of salaries and benefits. it might be a combination of difficult choices of revenue side, expenditure side, if the assumption is hetch hetchy pays for it. there is also polic other policy choices you can consider. if the general fund were to pay for the additional costs. that is a matter for policymakers to make, not me to suppose. there is the mix and match, if there were a decision to raise rates for those who don't pay over time. we could bond on some of our capital projects. if for example you thought you would have 1 cent the first year and 2 cents the second and you were willing to bonn that, that could stretch out the payment for those facilities or the bus on van ness. that would make you more comfortable. it is almost impossible to think of any way out of it that does not include something from the

we have not had true leadership on grenoble's. on the issue of lafco, i am fed up. -- we have not had a troop leadership on rende true leadern renewables. if the body over here has to come up with the money, where at loggerheads. it is time we come up with a business plan where we ask lafco and the people they hire and sfpuc, there is a convoluted diatribe. we need it in simpler language. when it comes to the red hill, are we going to get anything? or 13 cents? because we are living if you are alive in dire economic times. their economic times. 14 million people out of jobs. 420,000 people have joined the working poor. thank you. president vietor: thank you. >> good afternoon, commissioners. eric brooks. i have been listening in the audience and liking a lot of what i am hearing. this is exactly that -- the discussion we need to be having about what ratepayers will pay and financing for this program. when cca was created, it was never intended to be rolled out at a higher rate than pg&e to ratepayers. it was intended to mitigate t

there is a different variety that we can utilize under grenoble's which is the -- that we can utilize. you can -- electricity comes off those panels. there is firm renewal bills which is the bulk of the product we will be purchasing. -- renewable switches the bulk of the product we will be purchasing. there is the tradeable renewable energy credits. all the sources would qualify as renewable under the california energy commission's guidelines. and all are the types of resources that count toward rps. in terms of developing the grenoble's over time, we are envisioning we would be operating on a parallel path. the process would develop city owned resources. the term sheet for the contract is similar. the opportunity is to substitute resources. we could replace an existing resource. we also in terms of talking about, we will get to customer enrollment later. we talked about phasing in customers, adding to the program over time. we can plan for having generation be available, using a new generation to offset future demand as customers come on board. which brings me to customer enrollment.

you would be able to see a revenue stream sooner and we would be able to build the grenoble's. having options there rather than just the 100% product may be of interest, but i am sure there is more in history on that but i do not want to be burdened with but i am sure i will hear more about trade with regard to their rates to other city departments, i continue to think we should charge more to city departments, particularly those that are paying that have the capacity or should be paying at least the cost of generation. there are some that are below that level as we learned. facing that in makes a lot of sense and i would suggest at a minimum for the first year that half of the increased revenue from the increased rates should go into an energy efficiency in those departments if we are going to charge mta, what ever it is. if we invest some amount of energy efficiency, i am sure there are other motion detectors that can do to reduce those power usage at the same time the rate is going up. all that is to the dead. we have all known for many years that the hetchy capital program

in 2005, recognizing there's a shortage for clean energy projects from grenoble's to crinkled to nuclear power, a president bush entitled the loan. it was designed to support next generation energy projects which involve technology and market risks that lenders often cannot are will not underwrite. other governments have recognized the value as well. germany and canada already offer such programs. australia and india have announced intend to do the same. none have been as aggressive as the chinese government that provided $30 billion in credit to the largest solar manufacturers. that is roughly 20 times larger than america's investment. why is china making this investment that the race for solar manufacturing jobs is the race for winning. this will become a global market worth trillions of dollars. in 1995, the united states manufactured more than 40% of the model sold worldwide. china share has gone from 6% 254% today. china is now home to five of the largest benefactors in the world. by late 2008, and the staff considered solyndra the most advanced of the project to review it. by the t