. $15.5 million financed through clp's. what other revenue sources did you look at? >> it would report revenue debt. we had assumed that. frankly, the city has a better credit rating. it is cheaper for us if we use that to repay the debt. that is primarily why the clp vehicle is preferred. >> on the city contribution, what is the deliberation there, in terms of financing? >> deliberation is whether the city wants an ongoing obligation related to the $6.5 million contribution, or would prefer to use cash as the city's contribution. it is really a matter of this committee whether they want to take on an ongoing obligation. the controller is in devising the mayor's office on expert -- preferred path. we will have a vehicle, because we are doing a clp, we are putting a vehicle in place for that decision if it was that. >> if it were not cash, could that be recommended again? >> yes, we would combine the 16.5 and 2.5 for a new issuance. part of which the harbor from would repay, part of which the city would repay. supervisor chu: related to the financing, i know some time