change the name. change the name. >> change the name. >> change the name. change the name. change the name. >> change did name. >> change did name. >> change the name. >> change the name. >> that is a video made by one >> that is a video made by one native american. native american. who rallied others to speak out. who rallied others to speak out. not all native americans dislike not all native americans dislike the name or even care. the name or even care. who should decide if the who should decide if the washington redskins should washington redskins should change the name? change the name? a sportswriter at the nation has a sportswriter at the nation has determined that the team needs a determined that the team needs a change. change. author of the author of the redskins redskins encyclopedia, he is a long time encyclopedia, he is a long time fan of the team. fan of the team. also on skype, sue san also on skype, sue san harjo, harjo, she's president of the morning she's president of the morning star institute an american civil star institute an american civil rights org

change the name. >> change the name. change the name. >> change did name. >> change the name. >> that is a video made by one native american. who rallied others to speak out. not all native americans dislike the name or even care. who should decide if the washington redskins should change the name? a sportswriter at the nation has determined that the team needs a change. author of the redskins encyclopedia, he is a long time fan of the team. also on skype, sue san harjo, she's president of the morning star institute an american civil rights organization, also actively protesting the name for years. and regina, a former tribal councilwoman and a redskins fan. dave, let's start with you. what's the big deal? why change the name? >> it's defined in webster's dictionary as a slur. the team, representing the nation's capital, should it be called something that offends so many people. that's the key question and how does the nfl want to represent civility to its -- itself to its fans? come out and vocally defend its name? >> t

he said things changed and that's why he changed his mind. >> he did change his mind since he said that. when we come back, we'll hear from the president of the united states. we still run into problems. that's why liberty mutual insurance offers accident forgiveness with our auto policies. if you qualify, your rates won't go up due to your first accident. because making mistakes is only human, and so are we. we also offer new car replacement, so if you total your new car, we give you the money for a new one. call liberty mutual insurance at... and ask us all about our auto features, like guaranteed repairs, where if you get into an accident and use one of our certified repair shops, your repairs are guaranteed for life. so call... to talk with an insurance expert about everything that comes standard with our base auto policy. and if you switch, you could save up to $423. liberty mutual insurance. responsibility. what's your policy? >>> p po getting ready to walk into the brady press briefing room in the west wing of the white house to make a statement on the senate decision to change t

them to sliding glass doors just changing those that's the only change. there was no change troiltd the path of traffic only because it was determined the second one wasn't necessary. the only physical change was removing the doorway and a putting a new doorway where the windows were before and that wouldn't trigger many additional process on our part >> okay. thank you. >> i'm not to go ahead and continue that for one week to the november 20th calendar on the grounds that the appellant has not seen the new revision that was developed on november 8th. and the fact that actually dbi for the first time saw the windows transformed to door. it may or may not be material but planning hadn't seen them in the official capacity >> we have a motion from the president to continue this motion to november 20th one week. (calling names) >> i would vote no, but not that state matters. (calling names). thank you. the vote is 3 to one so continuance that motion does not pass it's still before you. >> i guess i'll make a motion that we oh, let's see. deny the appeal well,

are no changes. i thought that we were kind of thinking in those terms, rather than saying, hands up everything goes back, because, you understand what the volume of business that we are doing right now that this is really burdensome on a department who will admit that they cannot plan check what they have right now. >> yeah, i understand that. roughly, i can roughly in 2013, on that lot on their side, and the problem is that i want to lay the rouding for the crumbels and when the single family addition in the back is not effecting planning and they want to look at it and it is weakened from our side and that is what i highly welcome you to talk to planning. because, planning is you know, some of the staff say that they are different, but with even work with the order and engineer, and architects are certified and they did not change it and usually the same permit is going to have a rough and set with the submit the architecture. >> and i understand the spiritual, but what i don't kind of sign-off is

it is time to change. is time to change before this institution becomes obsolete. at the beginning of this the republican leader pledged that this congress should be more bipartisan than the last congress. we are told scripture, let's take for example the book of numbers. , pledges, valves, one does not break his word. republicans work with the majority to process legislation in a effective manner. later, three weeks republicans mounted a first in history filibuster. they were against a highly qualified nominee against the possible secretary of defense. despite the fact that he was a republican senator. fornomination was contested 34 days. remember, mr. president, our country was at war. republicans to block executive nominees like chuck hagel, they do not object to their qualifications. they seek to undermine the government under which they would serve. the leader of the consumer financial protection bureau, take his nomination. there was no doubt about his ability to do the job. but the consumer financial protection bureau went for more than two years if any lead

you say it's going to change but is it going to change for better or for the worse because again if we take up your personal example of the government tapping your phones and you know you're seeing them later on thirty years later the governments you know some governments cannot afford to do that not only in or against some prominent journalist but also against them has a state and they don't have anything to fear i mean i'm sure you're aware of the recent n.s.a. scandal isn't that ultimately reflective of how disproportionate those roles of the media and the government have become we are no longer the watchdogs at all. but where we have their watchdogs and we've always operated within the confines of the prevailing hate money and diet. and we have very little influence we we in too far as we have any influence to target change or only things at the very at the margins and but with regard to the profound issues like for instance the equal distribution of wealth and power in respect to new and and educational that we have on most no effect at all. and incidentally my telephone nine h

it is >> it's not a big change they're in compliance changing windows to sliding glass doors for us it's not the planning department but you may want to look at that. i wanted to bring it to your attention. >> the plans were after the preapplication meeting i noticed it. they felt the doors wore going to do work better than the windows. it's another little something that i noticed. i didn't want to be talking about exiting and release latter it has nothing to do with the exit >> what was the egress to the roof. >> there was a single door going if like a when you come up the stairs to get to the top level there's a door that went off to the left the west side one single door and the penthouse area has been windows and now their challenged r be changed to doors. it's a design change i think more than anything. and whatever i definitely the a b 5 needs to be removed from this process. we don't want it on the plans it was issued in error but with the one exit from the roof-deck it goes away but if we're going to do another permit we want to get it off any approved documents >> okay. >> thank

. >> the rules were changed. just a few hours after the senate made history, the president went to the briefing room. noting that both he and his vie president the former members of the senate, stressed his respect for the body's traditions, however. >> the american people's business is far too important to keep falling prey day after day to washington politics. we both value any senate's duty to advice and consent. it's important. and we take that very seriously. but -- a few now refuse to treat that duty of advise and consent with the respect that it deserves. it's no longer used in a responsible way to govern. it's rather used as a reckless and relentless tool to grind all business to a halt. and that's not what our founders intended. >> what started all this was president obama's judicial nominations when a republican filibuster prevented judicial nominee from joining the u.s. court of appeals for the district of columbia. wilt kins is the third obama nominee this month blocked by republicans. the circuit is

the faces changing the world lights in the. world. filled picture of today's news. from around the globe. look to. pick up i think. everybody thought of doing the show did you know the price is the only industry specifically measure. in the constitution and. that's because a free and open press is critical to our democracy which i call brothers. in fact the single biggest threat facing our nation today is the call for the takeover of our government and across several that we've been a hydrogen right hand full of transnational corporations that will profit by destroying what our founding fathers but once i'm tom are going to get on this show we were to feel the big picture of what's actually going on in the world we go beyond identify them to try to fix a rational debate and a real discussion that critical issues facing america if i ever feel ready to join the movement then welcome it. and welcome back to conversations with great minds i'm speaking with the c.e.o. of the climate reality project maggie fox and maggie we've we've covered the climate reality project to

i would be looking to change the subject, change the subject just as senate democrats have been doing with their threats of going nuclear and changing the senate rules on nominations. if i were a senator from oregon, for example, which hasn't enrolled a single person, a single person for the obamacare exchange, i'd probably want to talk about something else, too. but here's the problem with this latest distraction. it doesn't distract people from obamacare. it reminds them of obamacare. it reminds them of all the broken promises. it reminds them of the power grab. it reminds them of the way democrats set up one set of rules for themselves and another for everybody else. one set of rules for them and another for everybody else. actually, this is all basically the same debate. and rather than distract people from obamacare, it only reinforces the narrative of a party that is willing to do and say just about anything to get its way. willing to do or say just about anything to get its way. because that's just what they're doing all over again. once again, senate democrats are threatening

in spite of all warnings climate change continues. so what will happen if we don't change. it all. some experts predict that global temperatures could rise as much as six degrees celsius by the end of the century. if those predictions come true glaciers and polar ice caps will melt in the sea level will rise. entire article echoes in some and areas would be flooded permanently not just the rural areas would be affected cities like london tokyo and new york could end up under water the year it's warming would cause more water to evaporate resulting in heavy rainfall and storms. ritter flooding would become a common occurrence in some areas rising temperatures would cause of the already battered regions to become even try resulting in more droughts and gets an expansion in places like the sahel region in africa. bloody war desertification and the resulting shortage of food and clean water which forced many people to leave their homes making them climate change refugees countless animals and plant species would be threatened with extinction because they wouldn't be able to adapt to ch

has beenof change slow. according to a recent analysis by the nonprofit group catalyst for payment reforms, roughly 11% of healthcare spending last week by employer-sponsored plans was based on values as opposed to the volume of services performed. as the head of the group was quoted as saying, nine of every $10 that was paid into the healthcare system with no attention to whether or not the care was performed well or poorly or whether it was appropriate in the first place. there's a focus on the traditional fee for service model which accounts for the other 89%. the argument is made that by paying a fixed price that ignores results. 156problem, too, is that million people in america are covered through employment-based health care programs. the healthcare benefits that they get are basically nontaxable, either in terms of personal taxes or and excise taxes there is therefore there is a comfort zone with that is going to be very difficult to penetrate. we don't know yet whether again, there's ever going to b

let's listen. >> the minority leader changes the rules for some judicial nominees, he's effectively changing them for all judicial nominees including the supreme court as senator grassley pointed out just yesterday. so, look, i realize this sort of wishful thinking might appeal to the uninitiated newcomers in the democratic congress who served exactly zero days in the minority, but the rest of you guys in the conference should know better. those of you who have been in the minority before should know better. let's remember how we got here. let's remember that it was senate democrats who pioneered, who literally pioneered the practice of filibustering circuit court nominees, and who have been its biggest proponents in the very recent past. after president bush was elected they even held a retreat in which they discussed the need to change the ground rules by which lifetime opponents are considered. the senior senator from new york put on a seminar, invited lawrence schrieb, and in the past the practice had been that neither filibustered circuit court nominees and i can remember at senator lot

it's gonna change. it's gonna change, ain't that right? right. and if a piece of tape comes by that's heavily magnetized, boom, you're gonna get a big pulse of current. a little tiny bit, a little tiny-- well, you can get variations. and isn't it amazing that that tape driving by there, the empty coil, the variations in the magnetism set up variations of voltage in that wire, faraday's law, which then goes into driving the speaker. again, the plug going back and forth glued to a what? a paper cone, and the paper cone vibrates the same way, mm, and you get music. so next time you look at your tape recorder, honey, what's underlying all of that? it's emi, what are talking about? electromagnetic induction. ain't that neat? now i got one question to leave you with-- i got two questions. number one was, how do this thing, foom, fly off? what's the basis of that electromagnetic levitation? and the other question is, is when i crank this generator, it's harder to turn when it's lit up and easier to turn when it's not. right now, i'm turning only against

the other small change shown here is the shipyard side as i mentioned the bus transit change alternated it slightly so we changed the workforce lots there. their that comparable in terms of the location and decent of the form and you know proximity to the open space. we've found those that be acceptable changes from staff prospective. in closing it will allow time for q and a the totality it remains trou true to the project it will accommodate the navy delay and uphold the tenants of bike friendly orientation and the major phase will make way for major job creating development. this is the iconic look that evan spoke of and it will remain apart from the city and consistent with the better street plan. our goal is to come back in detectives but wanted to give you accurate time to review and provide us with any feedback so when you get a draft in november it will be the final one for approval. thank you. thank you, very much. any public comment on this item. excellent let's move into q and a and a thank you very much for those shout outs. you say the same ningdz or things for an a couple

if people are going to change their lives, they need to have services that will help them change their lives. that is an important priority. other services have been public mental health, health and human services, housing and employment and economic development and we also have went into prisons, probation and started a reentry planning. we are talking about the results which has proved if you change your approach then you can improve the results and in san francisco, three years about before realignment and evidence base probation and sentencing we had over 7,000 individuals on probation, as a result we now currently have 5500 individuals under supervision and that includes all of this population that has been realigned in the state. instead of a 78 percent failure rate which is what parole has, probation has a 77 percent success rate, again changing the focus. the number of felony probationers who were revoked and sent to state prison, 3 years ago was 75 percent in 2009, and in 2012 we sent 65 individuals. of the 1310 felony probationers, 77 percent completed successfully and of the

of gaining civil rights and changing public opinion the change has been very fast and quite gratifying to see. >> how do you say that, though. when you see the earth shifting under your feet in this way, how do you think about it? >> you know, i think first of all the 1993 court decision from hawai'i made gay activists and our allies and people all over the world think this could really happen. maybe courts could really get this, and we could move forwar forwards. so there have been legal opinions, but it has involved gay people coming out and talking about why equal rights, why marriage, why families are important to them. and it involves allies speaking on our behalf. it has taken millions of people working on this. we've had a lot of victories lately, and that's been terrific, but it's not done. we still have 35 states where people can't get married, and it's not inevitable that we'll have equal rights across the country unless we continue to work for it. >> has it also taken a significant change among gay people themselves. this was not something talked about during the early years

changed. it's a big football weekend in tennessee. vanderbilt university plays the university of tennessee in knoxville. next week alabama plays at auburn. or maybe that's this week. big football games coming up. let's imagine this. let's say the vanderbilt-tennessee game being played at knoxville, home of the university of ten, vanderbilt gets home with one yard line and the university of tennessee says well, we're the home team so we'll just add 20 yards to the field or whatever it takes for us to win the game. or the boston red sox playing at home, let's say they're behind the cardinals this year and they get to the ninth inning, they're behind, and they say, well, it's our home field, we'll just add a few innings or whatever it takes so we can win the game. that's what the democratic majority did today. they said the rules don't allow us to do what we want to do, so we'll just change the rules to do whatever it takes to get the result we want. that's what they did with obamacare. we rememb

he didn't change his style. i think the interesting thing is, he gave one of the longer victory speeches i've ever heard. and the problem with it is, while it's an okay introduction, i still don't see how that plays in iowa. i don't see the -- coming from the midwest, rather self-deprecating part of the country, don't overly blow your horn. here is this guy saying i'm it, i'm the only thing that ever happened. >> i think the case christie is trying to make here, this is a speech 13 months in the making. this was a speech, as soon as sandy was over, it was clear there wasn't going to be a campaign this year. when chris christie makes his statement, it's a statement to leaders in the national republican party, hey, this is the model. i have the model. everything that you've heard in the last year about what republicans are doing wrong, here i have the solution. the thing i find interesting about christie, i don't think he falls into the same trap. we peg him as a moderate, but chris christie does not fall into any

so if you change the tree communities, you are really changing the ecology and the habitat for just about everything else. narrator: one way that rainforest tree communities have been changed is through outright destruction or habitat loss. this destruction has broken large rainforests up into many smaller habitat fragments. laurance is studying the effects of this forest fragmentation. dr. bill laurance: fragmentation in forest edges affect the rainforest in all kinds of ways. the rainforest, under its normal conditions, is a humid and dark and windless kind of environment. it's been surviving, existing for millions of years. and so many, many species have become specialized for these very unique micro-climatic conditions. and then you juxtapose that with a harsh, dry, windy cattle pasture, and so the conditions are just completely different. narrator: at the forest edge, where these two different environments meet, common plant species that are well adapted to the sunny and dry condition start to take over, affecting the overall diversity and structure of the forest. dr. sue laurance: o

and they all admitted that they had been impacted by changes in climate. maybe they're not aware of the technicalities in terms of what cause this is thing, but nonetheless the national level and the national government, the main culprit of what scientist versus been pointing is the main culprit of global warning, and so that moving towards we can contribute in a little way that we can, even if the rest of the developed countries are unable to do so. >> it's hard to imagine what this will all end up costing your country. not only the sheer destruction and the rebuilding that will have to take place, but moving 800,000 people out of the path of the storm, bringing in emergency aid, can a country like the philippines, a developing economy, bear these costs by itself? >> not by ourselves, definitely. as we mourn our dead we have to take care of the living. sometimes it's really more expensive. we have seen our expenditure increased 26% since 2008. much faster the increase of our national budget of only 6%. we're seeing most of this ex-p expenditure. if you lo

that is going to change. one of the things that i am concerned about is when you use volume as a metric for reimbursement, to have a level playing field to define what the quality parameters you're going to use. one of the things, data came out of new york that was exporting of the difficult cases west of the cleveland clinic. i think that whether by design or just by circumstance, there may be a de facto rationing built into this because we are not going to take on the tough cases and not offer the services. >> we know we need to get from one side of the road to the other. i think everybody is clear that we need to say we are paying for value. is not aware we need to go that is a problem, it is how we build the economic model. i'm still, as we heard earlier, a lot of my business is still in fee-for-service. how do you think about managing the transition economically? >> i'm going to escape to her think the puck is going to be as wayne gretzky said. we think about the implications of how to decrease readmissi

change they should name. i just remember all of the cowboy movies growing up and their word redskin was always used in those movies and it was derogatory toward american indians and native american people. therefore, yes, absolutely to change it. it is racist. carol, we have a tweeting here that says our norwegians offended by the use of the term vikings. not, some arere paired for the most part they're are not. it is something they treasure. they seem to treasure the name viking. whereas redskin is totally different. it is derogatory. host: thank you, carol. here is some more tweets. johnny is in ski it took, alabama. is oklahoma where i am. host: sorry, i have no idea where you got that. caller: i'm calling in to say that they should change the names. it is offensive to those who are american indian or least i believe it is. it is for me. i am osage indian. it is one of the tribes in oklahoma. we make up about one third of the population in the state should it is very unusual. if they wanted in their teams

change the rules. doing gerrymandering, it has gone on since -- >> this is a very interesting argument saying somebody else in your opinion did it wrong so it is okay -- >> i can't predict. i did not say that. all i'm saying is if you look at what you guys may say, we're not going to do what they did in those states. i am saying that we are looking out there right now when republicans have had control. man, have they used their power. >> we're going to break. we'll come back to this. stay here. next we have the final question for both of our guests. we also want at home to weigh in. do you think that dysfunction in washington is curable? tweet yes or no using the hash tag "crossfire." i started part-time, now i'm a manager.n. my employer matches my charitable giving. really. i get bonuses even working part-time. where i work, over 400 people are promoted every day. healthcare starting under $40 a month. i got education benefits. i work at walmart. i'm a pharmacist. sales associate. i manage produce. i

climate change summit in warsaw, and go to our website for all of our climate change coverage. this is democracy now! we will be back in a minute. [♪] >> a special shout out to the students and benjamin banneker high school who are visiting democracy now! today and watching the broadcast. democracy now!, democracynow.org, the war and peace report. i'm amy goodman. a new analysis by the associated press finds budget cuts imposed under sequestration promises to be far more painful in 2014. spending is already frozen at 2013 levels and the operating budget of federal agencies could shrink by billions more. the cuts in place will remain in effect for the next eight years unless congress acts to change them. federal funding for food stamps could face a $10 billion reduction over the next decade as part of a compromise bill to break a house deadlock on spending. the republican version of the bill, 170,000 u.s. veterans would be disqualified from the assistant program known as snap. all of this follows the so- called great recession which began in 2007 as the longest, deepest econom

it's time to change. it's time to change the senate before this institution becomes obsolete. >> now the republican leader basically said, give me a break. the people who are playing politics here are democrats sbp there's not a crisis in the judicial branch and what is going on is that democrats are trying to change the subject away from obama care. listen to what mitch mcconnell said. >> once again, senate democrats are threatening to break the rules of the senate, break the rules of the senate, in order to change the rules of the senate. and over what? over what? over a court that doesn't even have enough work to do? millions of americans are hurting because of a law washington democrats forced upon them and what do they do about it? they cook up some fake fight everybody judges. a fake fight over judges that aren't even needed. >> reporter: now, people looking at this might say, this is sort of process, it's about a couple of judges or a couple of the president's nominees, why do we care so much? sure

jim changed his routine. ask your doctor about xarelto®. once a day xarelto® means no regular blood monitoring -- no known dietary restrictions. for more information and savings options, call 1-888-xarelto or visit goxarelto.com. >>> welcome back to cnn. coverage of breaking news at united states senate. if you're not a fan of rules -- quite frankly, are any of us? today is a set of rules that really, really matters. it matters how legislation is going to be accomplished in the coming days, months and years. it also matters as to how our senators are going to get along, as if it was already something we didn't think was completely broken. a set of rule changes could trash relationships completely. i want to get right out to our cnn's dana bash, standing live. dana, set the stage, if you could, for our viewers who may be joining us for the bottom of the hour. our headline on the screen reads "reid proposes filibuster nuclear option." effectively, what does that mean? >> that means what rst eid, democratic leader in the senate, majority lead

talks about on sunday is going to change the lighting which will change possibly or morning commute. you have another change. >> i think this is cool. you'll get the opportunity to soon walk or bike the bay bridge from 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. bridge officials decided to implement the specific hours when daylight saving time ends and it starts getting darker earlier. a spokesman says if you want to walk or bike the bridge get there before 4:00 p.m. to give yourself time to walk the 4-plus mile route. the new hours will last until march. >> i hope they allow runners as well. i want to do a jaunlt across the bay bridge. >> it won't take you long. >> beginning tonight, the lights on the bay bridge will shine all night long since the sculpture was put up the lights are on from 2:00 a.m. until dawn. illuminate the arts that installed the project got the time extended to dusk until dawn. so when it's dark out the lights will be on. the l.e.d. sculpture was by the group holding a celebration for the all night lights tomorrow. >> we have to call jon kelley. he was pitching for. >> he was. i th

change. in closing, we strongly support the epa's efforts to clean up dangerous carbon pollution and applaud this important first step in the transition to a clean energy economy. thank you. >> good morning. my name is greg bertelson, and i am pleased to offer the following remarks to the environmental protection agency's plans. manufacturers are committed to protecting the environment through greater sustainability, conservation and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. make no mistake, the regulation we are discussing today is about energy. how we generate it, whether we can rely on a steady and secure supply of it. energy is the lifeblood of manufacturing. manufacturers consume 1/3 of the nation's energy. today, ingenuity of manufacturers and energy reduces and endeavors of makes of energy resources, energy is a bright spot for manufacturing. manufacturers are making big investments in energy. if done the wrong way, this revelation will threaten energy reliability, increase costs for manu

this is a huge change in the way the senate does business and it could change it really forever. democrats have changed the rules so the filibuster can no longer be used when it comes to presidential nominations. >> if we love our country some 230 plus years there have been 160 filibusters half of them occurred during the obama administration. 230 plus years. 50 percent. >> millions of americans are you are the had gone because of a law washington democrats forced upon them. what do they do about it? they cook up some fake fight over judges. >> this is something both parties have threatened to do over the years but no one has ever followed through on that threat before yesterday and here's why. >> this is not a very proud day in the history of the senate. in order to distract attention away from obamacare, the senate has just broken the rules in order to change the rules. >> and we saw three democrat vote against the rule change. while president obama supported the move yesterday back when he was in the senate in 2005 republicans were in control of the senate they were talking ab

but what happened is that it changed the even though the plans were not necessarily changed, they were adopted enough to change the positioning of the roads, or with the roads or something like that and then it went straight through the department and it was not until the very end of the project where the fire department came in and said that we can't get our fire trucks in there. and so i think that i have no problem with somebody looking at it just to make sure, because we are not responsible, and often times we don't even know what is attached to it as a condition of the planning department, in the process and so i would say that somebody from planning should look at it, but there should be a clock, there should be some sort of a time frame that they return it to our department if there is no issue. >> commissioner lee? >> back to the example that commissioner walker described. wouldn't we have the knowledge to say, okay, if we would make these changes, this is going to effect the planning? >> it didn't. >> and then send it back. >> it didn't in this case. i am just saying. >> i wou

change you needed to change mindsets he call it hey community and i thought that that could be dealt with only through what he called contract money and to a large extent we are we are irrelevant we are just. howling at the wind. but if we see ourselves as part of an ongoing counter had to many against the prevailing idiology of neo liberalism then over time if enough people do it things will change and i don't think there's any prospect of that happening of any imminent change it will be generation you say it's going to change but is it going to change for better or for the worse because again if we take up your personal. example of the government tapping your phones and you know you're seeing them later on thirty years later the governments you know some governments cannot afford to do that not only in or against some prominent journalist but also against them has a state and they don't have anything to fear i mean i'm sure you're aware of the recent n.s.a. scandal isn't that ultimately reflective of how disproportionate those roles of the media and the government have become we ar

in fact a lot of changes even in the last year. the thing about this corridor is that if you don't, if you visit a week later, seems like there is something new happening on valencia and so in terms of environmental impact, i can see the point that it is significant that munis line was eliminated. it is significant that you have lower than desired the on time performance by the lines that are there. we know that service has been cut by the mta we have seen a lot of new businesses on the corridor and we have seen things like park let's but they also have an environmental impact. so it seems to me that there is a very valid point that there are a lot of changes that have taken place that require more in depth review in terms of environmental impact. >> elisa gibson. i can respond to that. ceqa establishes points that leads to other ceqa review after certain mitigations have been adopted and those circumstances change the revision to ceqa review document due to the identification of new significant impacts that were not previously ide

and that the change was. characterizing you're making a generalization was changes for the worse the top executives were to blame for it and i think what my book comes out and then discovered through academic research was that. the change had courage i don't discuss whether or not the change was for the better or for the worse by the new change occurred. and that i don't think that as we just discussed lloyd blankfein of the current executives or are to blame for that it's really a result of many many changes over a long period of time stephen thank you for the time and your time that was stephen mcmanus a former goldman sachs employee and author of the book what happened to goldman sachs thank you time now for today's dale. the best and the brightest from the world's most prestigious universities tend to headed to wall street or at least they used to do that now new research published by the wall street journal shows that recent grads are we're growing the canyons of wall street in favor of the rolling hills

because the people change. we have to ask ourselves what do we not know. we have to think about and ask older people would should change >> it should be students learning the way you're learning with real, real instruments of the industry that you might be interested in. a smaller community i'd like to see all of our schools have the same access to all technology and taught resources. >> i think the craziest thing is constitutes shouldn't even have to be going to a building wherever they are. >> the institutions at universities they maybe based in one city and the students can learn from all over the world. >> that's it. thank you. thank you to our students and wonderful teacher. >> thank you. any other comments or questions from the board. that's it. you're done. short and sweet. we will move on to item n calendar resolution there are none this evening and o vote on the consent calendar. roll call, please. >> thank you (calling names). >> i'm going to be a b abstaini from k-49, k 5, k-7 thank you. (calling nam

things are changing as we change. i think, you know, the question of whether we've learnt what we need to, school is out on that. i'd like to follow up on something that adam said. it's not just the big storms, it's a mistake to think that your future is going to be written by one of these storms. >> you have to remember in 1991 there was another typhoon that hit the philippines, smaller, category 1. it killed around 5,000 people. it's not necessarily the size and the intensity, it's the characteristics. slow-moving storm can produce the same consequences. you have to think not so much about the storm event. you have to think in terms of what are you prepared for. >> how to protect yourselves. >> mark davis, adam sobel, we appreciate you coming in. >>> coming up fake obama scams across the country, how people are getting conned and what is going on about it. join the consider on "consider this" on twitter and our facebook pages. al jazeera america... >>introduces... "america tonight". >>a fresh take on the stories tha

change your number. turn it up. androgel 1.62%. add brand new belongings from nationwide insurance and we'll replace stolen or destroyed items with brand-new versions. we put members first. join the nation. ♪ nationwide is on your side ♪ i started part-time, now i'm a manager.n. my employer matches my charitable giving. really. i get bonuses even working part-time. where i work, over 400 people are promoted every day. healthcare starting under $40 a month. i got education benefits. i work at walmart. i'm a pharmacist. sales associate. i manage produce. i work in logistics. there's more to walmart than you think. vo: opportunity. that's the real walmart. because you can't beat zero heartburn. woo hoo! [ male announcer ] prilosec otc is the number one doctor recommended frequent heartburn medicine for 8 straight years. one pill each morning. 24 hours. zero heartburn. >>> you brought me into this company for my marketing expertise, correct? >> yes. >> you know i was the brains behind the an bell armaments. 30% growth in three fisc

majority leader harry reid triggered the role change. more from the white house on the controversial change. >> the senate likes to call itself the world's greatest body. after changing a 100-year-old rule that governed the rule around filibuster, the chamber is in fear of a meltdown. president obama heralded the change. >> people should vote their conscience, on behalf of their constituents. they should vote. that's what they are there to do. >> the president accused the republicans of abusing senate rules. >> a determined effort to obstruct everything, no matter what the merits to refight an election is not normal. >> there were three votes on obama nominees to the d.c. court of appeals. republicans blocked them all. the change means a majority of 51 senators can confirm all presidential nominees except to the supreme court. before today the number was 60. republicans called it a power grab. john mccain quoted the words of barack obama in 2005 when he opposed a change. >> if the right of free and open debate is taken away from the mino

it's time to change. it's time to change the senate before this institution becomes obsole obsolete. mr. president, at the beginning of this congress the republican leader pledged that, and i quote, this congress should be more bipartisan than last congress. mr. president, we are told in scripture let's take, for example, the old testament, the book of numbers, promises, pledges, a vow, one must not break his word. in january, republicans promised to work with the majority to process nominations in a timely manner by unanimous consent except in extraordinary circumstances. mr. president, exactly, three weeks later republicans mounted a first in history filibuster of a highly qualified nominee for secretary of defense, despite being a former republican senator, a decorated war hero having saved his brother's life in vietnam. defense secretary secretary chuck hagel's nomination was in the senate a record 35 days more than three times the previous average of the secretary of defense. >> remember, mr. preside