now gus ellis is free and wants answers. i've been hired by his civil attorney to see the case through. so, if science proved his innocence through new and improved technology, what's the basis for the lawsuit? well, a week before her murder, claire gibson called the police complaining that a man was looking at her through her bedroom window. gus ellis was identified as the peeper. i remember that. he was also the one who called 911 from the gibson murder scene. he said that he looked through the victim's window, saw her lying there, and claimed she was already dead. he was arrested that same day, which we call... a rush to judgment. he was the person of interest in an investigation started by the victim. a week later, he calls 911 from her murder scene. no prints, no semen, no evidence linked mr. ellis to the inside of that... i-i remember that there was a crowbar next to her with his blood on it. mr. ellis stated that he never went inside that house and he never touched that crowbar. russell: he claims only way his blood w