when you have this recent crisis the united states the united kingdom many other countries in the region went out of the way all of you know bailing out protecting the regulator and. it not only reeks of double standard it it actually i would argue damages the chances of global economy of priming itself would you agree with that that's a fair point because i think that if you look at the case of east asia or even russia the way into a massive crisis in ninety seven ninety eight and then but that set the stage for a big boom to begin ofter that because they carried out some significant reforms new leaders given to police those new leaders had new energy levels and so i think there was a cleansing process there is in the developed world i think that you corrected by sort of cushioning the blow and by going off the stimulus of the stimulus of the stimulus and a more dire using the pain they are not being able to carry out the more fundamental reforms needed for growth having said that if you look at the case of the united states the private sector in the us is growing at about three percent

at the end of the day the united states needs to be independent of middle east oil. until then we're going to be sucked into every crises in the middle east. when i look at how reagan won the cold war it was by driving down the price of oil, the soviet union's only export. the price of oil would go down. if iran doesn't have oil above $90 a barrel, they don't meet payroll and their own people get angry and say we want a change. >> k.t. mcfarlane, we appreciate your expertice and your perspective tonight. thank you, my friend. >> thank you, harris. >> let's bring in fox news military analyst by phone this evening. we're also keeping -- if we can split screen this we'll see on the right side of the screen iranian leadership walking out of this meeting. we are standing by to see -- of course it's live television so when satellites go up and down, don't panic. john kerry expected to speak momentarily. we'll bring you that live when it happens. major general you're with us? >> i am. good evening. >> good evening. what's your first response to hearing some of the details c

there have been chicano families living in the united states when the united states was not the united states, when new mexico and texas were part of mexico and before that even, before even the spaniards arrived. filipino and chinese families here whose ancestors worked on the transcontinental railroad and came here 150 years ago. white people who came here as migrants from europe. all of us work. all of us have to work. that's how we put bread on the table. but i think we have to be real about this, and that is that without the labor of migrants in our economy here, the economy here could not function. so to those building contractors who hire the people who clean the buildings here in new york, do you think tata they pay -- that they pay for the needs of the workers' families in the towns that people are coming from? they depend on this flow of people into new york city to do this work, but do they pay for what it takes those up toes to keep on producing workers that are going to come here? who is it that builds the homes in oaxaca? who is it that builds the schools and pays for the

inside the united states. and that does not include the more than $200 million in additional military construction requests that the department believes it needs to spend to keep guantanamo running in the coming years. and, you know, mr. president, again, i want to repeat this. if this added to our security, it would be worth it but it doesn't. if we can bring these same people to the united states to be held as prisoners of war the way we did italians and others during world war ii -- i had hundreds of them in my own home state -- if we added to our security by keeping guantanamo open instead of just having a place which is used as a training ground and used as an argument for jihad, we can keep these people in the united states safely, just as safely as guantanamo, and maximum security prisons or urn the military jurisdiction with the same amount of security for the people of the united states at far less cost. now, we -- we are all facing sequestration. it's undermining the readiness of our armed forces and

to make its headway here in the united states. and we believe it's a positive impact with everybody. >> how do you deal with the criticisms dealing with the fact that there may have been some unintended consequences. the price of corn goes up, and it -- it costs you? >> sure, i have been in the agriculture industry for 30-plus years, and i have seen good crops as far as corn being raised and bad crops as far as corn being raised. i have seen corn at $1.44 a bushal being sold, and corn at $7.50 being sold off of the farm. at $1.50, farmers are not making the money they deserve to make. and the ethanol industry is part of that to allow the farmers to enjoy that opportunity to have a lifestyle that everybody should have, and if the renewable industry remains strong, they'll continue to enjoy that, and yeah, we have seen the prices fall off in the last couple of months from $6.50, down to i think today was $4.20 a bushel. >> yeah. >> and that changes, but we have a large crop out there. i think the usda came out with a report of 13.99

in the united states occasionally still in the united states even with the ada law. >> i am very sympathetic to people -- i'm not asking -- >> whether or not you believe should it not be the power and advocacy of the united states on behalf of its citizens to be able to enjoy what they enjoy and access to opportunity to become more global norm? >> we cannot make everything we would like into a global norm and i am skeptical that this is the right priority for us and if i could give you another example, a lot of americans have difficulties with foreign-languages. i include myself there. we find -- if everyone spoke english -- provide us -- >> it is limitation. i am not sure it is a severe limitation but we cannot get every country to do exactly what we would like him to do. >> we cannot get every country to be at democracy. we do not stop from seeking to promote democracy globally. we do not ultimately wish that certain countries would move in a way that creates a security challenge to the united states but we send our sons and daughters abroad when we think the national security of the unite

they were all critical of the united states. pakistanis unstable government is pakistans west enemy. americans can only help in the private sector, if and when feasible. u.s. policy should be more aware of the fat rick of the people and long term consequences. we need more americans involved on the political front working with policy makers for change. >> what can and should the governments with doing right now to have better regses? >> one thing that went missing in the visit to washington which got so much attention on the drone issue, one thing that went missing was all the conversation that had to do with the economic issues. and the prime minister really wanted to highlight that, and the obama administration really wanted to put him in a position where he could talk to officials about this. so they did. all the secretary of commerce. so speak to him on these issues -- and the overlap seems to lie in the observation that pakistan's economy, pakistan's development, really will only take off if it's further integrated into its

the united states is the leadership. the point that i would raise the failure to ratify compromises the u.s. ability to advance the standards globally. it weakens our own credibility to participate in the development internationally of the rights of the with disabilities and is the chairman pointed out and others have pointed out it also compromises very much american citizens who are in other countries and their own protections. we are certainly not in the same position as we would for the rights of people in our own country. secretary ridge your comments? >> thank you very much senator. i want to respond to an appropriate question from senator johnson if i might. i think regardless of where you are in the political spectrum we all feel very fortunate and grateful that we live in the united states of america and it's a very unique place. if america was considered to be a product we could try to sell our private overseas, what is our brand? i think our brand is the constitution rule of law and our value system. under tha

hy select the perspectives on operating in the united states." this'll be a very informative and invaluable discussion. it is also my pleasure to introduce that moderator of this panel, an important member of president obama's white house team, valerie jarrett. a senior adviser to the president and a longtime confidant of the president. she oversees the office of andgement and affairs chairs the white house council on women and girls. she was the chief executive officer of the habitat company. baldry has held positions in both the public and private sectors and hails from chicago before coming to washington, d.c. lees give gentlemen, a warm welcome to valerie jarrett. [applause] good morning, everyone. you look fantastic out there. we are all delighted to be here. i would like to begin by congratulating a secretary who has truly hit the ground running since the apartment. has traveled all over the world and gave a party and everyone showed up. you showed up and we were surprised. i also want to give credit to former secretary and now an ofassador

united states backs the s.n.c. while russia has been trying to convince all sides negotiate the proposed conference in geneva. violence is a key local election in kosovo where ethnic serbs were encouraged to vote for the first time police fired tear gas to disperse a group of masked men who raided a polling station in the multiethnic city of. international observers fled as the clashes broke out the local serbian minority has been under pressure to boycott the poll and to avoid further legitimizing the state is a breakaway course of. that big homes biggest states but big money troubles england's bluebloods are feeling the economic squeeze even though britain is recovering artie's tetra syria met one bread line. when one speaks of the british aristocracy be traditional a landed gentry or a nobleman what would imagine lavish lifestyles and grand estates as it would have been centuries ago but the reality today is not quite up to par as it would have been in the past. i'm on what we call the job seekers allowance so i

one of the closest allies of the united states and we've seen. actually forgave the usa for tending its back on more bartok but. in the long run a new thought to the support of the army so it had a safety net it had an insurance policy in both egypt and in two it was that was one of the major reasons that actually the obama pulled the rug from under their feet. off mubarak knowing fully well that supporting this important pivotal point where the actually win over the conflict win over the support of the people to the army which actually took over power and diffused to relinquish power it was only after protests. but you had to think that talks more about indecision and the lack of strategery even understanding what's going on on the ground and how would you how would you look at how the western powers particularly the united states has dealt with events in the greater middle east over the last two years because you know we can look at each individual country in their specifics there but the bomber administration seems to be very unclear on what d

the united states. can you give us your sense of raw specs for the u.s. economy and why the united states is a good place for investment, given global opportunities, larry? >> i can answer that in two parts. one is at an investor who helped companies come to markets in bond markets and as an investor in companies worldwide. first and foremost, we have the most resilient capital markets in the world. we have the safest capital markets in the world. and years ago we credit sarbanes-oxley, and 10 years later we have now witnessed more ipo's than ever before. we are seeing young companies coming here, but not just young companies. we are seeing more international companies seeking to come here. the primary reason as an investor, we have more confidence in the financial statements of these companies, especially young companies, that we do not have a long history understanding and they do not have a long history of having strong and robust financial statements. but you feel much more confident that a regulato

united states from the united kingdom from france from the european union so we're dealing with a very different world than of course the israelis also disprove your point the israelis would love to annex the west bank and create what they call eretz israel but they are prevented from doing so by the knowledge that that would probably use the israeli regime so changing borders by force. and i don't think it is and i say that and i think that you know to think a really interesting here and gentlemen incident where it's what we have to act we're looking at it in two different ways we're looking at international law and the united nations which is all nice and fine but charlie facts on the ground or very different ok the kurds are not going to listen to that if they haven't chance for their nation state they're going to go for it iraq is being broken up into three different countries libya is falling apart as well it doesn't matter if the international community recognizes that separation there happening on the ground as we speak go ahead charlie oh yes and i think also facts on the groun

this truly hypocritical and i think it damages the united states and it damages the perception of the united states with people on the ground because they say these people these want these americans they just support dictators saudi arabia is the best example. well yeah no i mean it is a conundrum of the president he did inherit this i mean unfortunately you know he did he did you know cast the cast the first stone and he said in cairo that he that he. was going to advance this new vision of democracy and he was going to support these democracy movements unfortunately got very complicated and which he was he was facing a host of allies in the middle east the elites the monarchies who were counting on him also to stop these rebellions and so what did he do he did nothing unfortunately and i don't know what the answer is but i mean if you take one example you mentioned bahrain maybe he should have took a ricks there maybe he should have took a risk and sided with the democracy movement and bahrain and said to the allies listen we're going to do what's right here ok i mean we have enormo

the united. it's not in america's interest to have a weak europe. it's fundamentally -- to have the strongest and most capable we can. we need to find way, ultimately, for this alliance to prosper by having more resources devoted to defense. that means as economies rebound, there is a need to increase spending on defense. that means that as economies rebound, more of the spending needs to go to investment. that mean that there needs to be the extent question find a way to more increases deference cooperation. let me wednesday perhaps -- anybody that knows me know that believed are spending on nuclear weapons. probably isn't the smartest spending we can think about when it comes to the future of this alliance. these are weapons that are not likely to have any role in anything we do in 99.999% of the time or perhaps even 100% of the time. i'm happy to take your questions. [applause] >> thank you very much. that was just fantastic. if it remains focus on collective dissent for irrelevant for the fut

this truly hypocritical and i think it damages the united states and it damages the perception of the united states with people on the ground because they say these people these want these americans they to support dictators saudi arabia is the best example. well yeah no i mean it is a conundrum of the president he did inherit this i mean unfortunately you know he did he did you know cast the cast the first stone and he said in cairo that he that he. was going to advance this new vision of democracy and he was going to support these democracy movements unfortunately got very complicated and which he was he was facing a host of allies in the middle east the elites the monarchies who were counting on him also to stop these and so what did he do he did nothing unfortunately and i don't know what the answer is but i mean if you take one example you mentioned bahrain maybe he should have took a ricks there maybe he should have took a risk and sided with the democracy movement and bahrain and said to the allies listen we're going to do what's right here ok i mean we have enormous investment

in the united states? and he said, no, actually it has to kind of go with the tv show. [laughter] and so, benjamin did a lovely job are in rave -- arenarrating the tv series. i did a couple of promotional appearances around the country with benjamin and watched as we ended m perhaps. as people rushed the stage. they took his picture. [laughter] i actually -- actually a little hard to do with camera phones. they were able to narrow it to the point where they just got the very handsome and talented benjamin. he generously said why continue you -- put ray in the picture too? it cuts you down to size in washington a city where tv journalists think they can act like movie stars to be with the real movie stars is a imriewfl and humbling experience. [laughter] >> did you find the story in any particular way to be personal? , i mean, did you take it as an academic exercise? did you take it as an exercise, as you mentioned, in term of working, obviously, with the television series and that side? did you put a littl

the united states? >> i am. >> can you speak to how that a relevant to the discussion here today on this treaty? >> well, sure. to be very brief, if bond was convicted of violating the chemical weapons agent. she -- >> in federal court; correct? >> correct. it's the federal statute, implementing the chemical weapons convention. what's basically at issue is whether or not congress had the authority to pass the chemical weapons implementation act. urn a case dating back now 90 #-plus years called missouri v. holland, the supreme court held that in some circumstances, the treaty power authorizes the federal government to make a treaty, and the treaty is otherwise valid. congress has the authority to enact a statute it would not otherwise have under the enumerated powers. >> the authority to the obligation -- i'll read out of article 4, general obligations of the treaty. it says, to this end article 4 requires state parties to adopt all appropriate measures to implement the rights in the convention, modify

people are proud of the beers made in the united states. stone brewing, port city and that's something worth fighting for, especially this time of era where much is being outsourced. 100 years ago basically all the beer in the united states was made here. today the largest brewer in the united states might make 2 million barrels. those large conglomerate companies are based overseas. >> i was out to dinner with my young adult son, and he was asking connoisseur-like questions of the waiter about their drink offerings. when the waiter went with a away, i quizzed him about that. he said oh dad, when you drink better you drink less. which was a great thing for a young adult to say. but do you use and relate the product differently if you have that kind of relationship with it? >> well, absolutely. it's the difference between fast food and the fine dining restaurant, or actual artisan cheese and pre-wrapped processed cheese slices. we're getting away from the idea of industrialized notion facsimile of beer to real beer. actual real beer is worth

in the united kingdom? >> well, i know how hard my honorable friend has worked with other mps on a cross-party basis across the region to try to attract investment into our country and we should continue to target that investment. >> will the prime minister join me paying tribute to the positive role played by trade unions in the work of the automotive council which has brought the renaissance in the u.k. car industry? >> i think the automotive council has been extremely successful. where trade unions play a positive role i will be the first to praise them but where, where, frankly, where frankly we have a real problem with a rogue trade union that who nearly brought the petrochemical industry to its knees we need to have a proper inquiry, a labour inquiry of if they had any courage, any vision, any strength of decision-making they recognize they need to have the and again on sunday night at 9 p.m. eastern and pacific on c- span. you can find video of past programs. nd other next, remarks by iraqi prime ki.

the united states. i think we have a special responsibility to demand there be some accountability, there be some truth. >> a truth that has long bothered mcgovern was that two salvadoran generals were granted asylum in the united states. >> the thought of them just kind of living the good life here in the united states i find repulsive. they are guilty of things that are terrible. >> the general's victims have been pursuing them in american courts. a key witness against them is dr. juan romogosa, seized by the military while treating poor farmers in the country side. romogosa was tortured browltly brutally at the national guard headquarters in 1980. >> how did you get through that? >> romogosa's two military uncles finally got him released but not before one last terrifying ordeal. vidas casanova who oversaw his torture was there. romogosa and two other salvadorans, in 2002 a jury found them liable for command responsibility for torture and other atrocities. today the u.s. department of justice is seek

united nations from the prism of the u.n. security council then we have here five powers russia china united states france and germany which. the five members which are actually the the ones that have the veto power with china that they want to have the veto power in order to really enforce some executive powers. but again from the for instance from the perspective or from other countries some other countries or you can say from the syrian perspective the international community is is not the u.n. security council the international david they believe that it is system. that they really inclusive it's actually exclusive they believe that the international community in other words in the more i think academic or professional awards it's more the general assembly or member game i think that's fair and i would agree with you on that ok because every september there's a vote in the general assembly for recognition of a palestinian state and i'll have to check the numbers but it's one hundred eighty something against two or three o

at the united nations from the prism of the u.n. security council then we have here five powers russia china united states france and germany which. the five members which are actually the the ones that have the veto power with china that they want to have the veto power in order to really enforce some executive powers. but again from the for instance from the perspective or from other countries some other countries or you can say from the syrian perspective the international community is is not the u.n. security council the international david they believe that it is system. that they really inclusive it's actually exclusive they believe that the international community in other words in the more i think academic or professional awards it's more the general assembly member game i think that's fair enough i would agree with you on that ok because every september there's a vote in the general assembly for recognition of a palestinian state and i'll have to check the numbers but it's one hundred eighty something against two or three o

solely from the united states. we have factors out in the midwest where 80% of the production is for export only. we work hard at being competitive both internally in our system at caterpillar but we also work hard with the u.s. government and michael and many others to open markets outside the u.s. because after all, 95% of our potential customers are not in this country. they are outside and we desperately need that. over the last five years our total exports have exceeded $82 billion from the united states. and those are destined for virtually every country in the world at some point or another. i cannot over emphasize the benefits of trade and open trade, but sometimes it's a hard message. free trade, open trade and globalization sometimes has a pretty tough context in a lot of small towns were our plans are. that's a message that all of us have to get out and work on, because without access to those 95% consumers outside this country, i don't know where we will be in a generation or two from the. we all need t

the united states. who came here -- under the ada? >> no, they came here under our law of asylum, but the question in the case pending, that case is also pending before the supreme court -- >> well -- >> well it's for a -- >> let me say -- >> i guess you don't want me to answer the question after all. >> you can't because you want to talk about something other than the american disabilities act or convention. that's what we're here to discuss. >> the convention has a different legal standard than the ada. >> i can tell you -- >> there's numerous organizations that say so. i include their citations in my written testimony. >> if -- >> i'm not the only one who says that. the crpd committee agrees with me. >> i say if we're going to have a battle of the organizations support and not supporting this, we prevail. we have the mainstream disability organizations across america who are supporting the adoption of this convention on dates. i -- just -- i struggle with the notion that we are going to stop this eff

the united states is not in the conflict official conflict in pakistan. these are legal under international law if the united states gets one a military conflict in the state of with the state of pakistan then you there's a little bit of wiggle room there but still they deny the obvious. well that's right what they're saying is that the united states is that a war with al-qaeda and its associated forces which gives according to the us government carte blanche to go in anywhere but as colonel morris davis said this is a terrible precedent that we're setting for the rest of the world and no matter what kind of arrangement was made with the pakistani government earlier on it certainly has not been made with the present government and ben emmerson the un rapport tourer said that even if the military of pakistan made an agreement with the united states the military is not the elected government we have to go by what the elected government says which is stop the drone strikes but i would agree with piers there is certainly a responsibility for the pakistani gov

iran by the united states. the worsening economic situation inside iran means the country is finding other ways to make ends meet china has reportedly agreed to finance various projects by blogging twenty two billion euros of oil assets. deal in the why not the dollar so the sanctions don't affect china's business with its third biggest crude oil supplier political analyst side mohammad marandi says the us agenda is splintering. this is one of many signs the u.s. imposed sanctions is not working and it's beginning. to fall apart not that the united states wants this to happen the united states wants to make ordinary iranians suffer as much as possible they want to. the iranian economy and they've already succeeded in killing people because for example iran has had great difficulty importing medicines so. upset with this but. we are seeing increasingly countries moving away from the united states companies in the united states and even individuals. investing in iran without taking the sanctions regime into consi

of the united states. you get into things like education system, our taxing system, and all of the things that make u.s. companies competitive vis-À-vis our competitors around the world. that is another brought sucbjec t. to have a level playing field between ex-im bank and tariffs and the ability to penetrate markets that are open is kind of the foundation of all of this. past that, it is up to u.s. companies to be competitive and up to the american government, certainly, to help us all be as competitive as we can to create manufacturing jobs and job growth. i look at it in those three steps of foundational work. the opening of markets is fundamental to starting the process. we export an awful lot from the united states. we work hard every day on internal label agreements. we have spent a lot of time on our education system. but if we do not have those markets to start with, the rest of this is -- we have got to be there to play. auto business,e what would you see as the competitive threats? >> we love f

banks all by the lead individuals who loan money to the united states. for all the federal spending that we do and we have to pay that back your citizens have to pay all that money back with interest so if you took all the american money and put it in a big warehouse you would only account for about four or five percent of all the american money that exists because if they loan a billion dollars to the government then that house repaid back with interest but where does the interest come from it doesn't exist it's a theory. wasn't it always like that it's not like something that just happened overnight i mean it was only a couple of centuries ago obviously governments were financed a little bit by rich people that would make two hundred thirteen. after a lot of bank foreclosures or bank closures and a lot of economic crisis united states. the federal reserve was to was was formed and the united states has been a. prison ever science and we've always been that there's no way if we paid back everything we owe with all the money all our resources that we hav

the united states is not only its foreign policy. it is also all of its people and -- and what they do, and that's what cultural diplomacy can bring to the floor. but i agree, i'm not sure the role is necessarily sending americans around the world. i think a more useful role is to leverage local voices, where there are local actors in the literal and figurative sense who are pushing their societies forward; who are pushing the envelope, speaking out freely, advocating for the people, questioning the government. them. >> all right. that's all the time we have. thanks so our guests and to our online community. waj and i will see you on line. this is the al jazeera news hour. these are the stories we are covering in detail. thousands upon thousands beyond help in the philippines. as worsening weather makes the aid effort a desperate race, and those who survived. the united nations humanitarian chief she is unhappy with the international response so the crisis. >> hello there, in london, with all the news

the soviet union and the united states. what's happening here, industry insiders and intelligence sources tell you this is a more like a computerized technology. it's not so much a nuclear weapon-type technology that's extremely difficult to develop. these are really basically remote control airplanes. you and i can go out to a hobby store and buy a version of a drone and potentially fly it around. the reality is to use it in a clandestine way that becomes desired by a powerful military in the world is that you got to reach a new level of sophistication. the types of drones that the united states, israel and britain have and a handful of other countries, the chinese re believed to, the turks, the israelis, are relatively unintelligent. they were designed at a time in the post-9/11 era when the united states military needed a way to quickly go in and surveil patches of the world that did not have air defenses, for instance. so there was no need to make these things as stealth as big fighter jets. so particularly those models

[applause] >> outtake the united states one. statesll take the united one. [laughter] >> that was very impressive and passionate and informative and frank. i thank you for it. i think we all thank you for it. as i was listening, it prompted a lot of memories. i probably visited 15 or 20 times as a member of congress. can we turn the mic up a little bit? i have visited iraq 15 or 20 times during my tenure. i was on the armed services committee. earlier when i was a much younger man, i fought in vietnam. i spent time studying the problems of terrorism and counterterrorism efforts. it comes back to the populace. if the populace in a given area is opposed to the terrorist, to those who do harm, they are pretty good at being able to see where the problem is and get in touch with authorities and let them know. that with authorities can deal with the issue. i was listening to your remarks. in iraq, with assistance from the united states, the armed services are in a position to deal with terrorists once they know who they are and where they are. you describe the too

boston built the first modern sewer system in the united states. ours was completed between 1877 and 1884. with this wonderful new sewer system, we were taking our filth and moving it out to the ocean. of course, all of this was untreated. in the 1960s, we were still pumping all of our sewage out to moon island, untreated. we would get swimmers here, never knowing, in the middle of summer, why you would have a cold. well, we were swimming in diluted sewage. melosi: the major way to deal with pollution, at least until early into the 20th century, was through the process of dilution. the assumption was that the capacity of rivers and streams, and even the seas, allowed for certain levels of pollution that eventually would purify themself. as we get later into the 20th century, it becomes clear that the volumes of waste made dilution unworkable as a single solution. and so treatment became the ways in which we deal with pollution. narrator: to protect public health, starting in the 1950s and '60s, there was a push to put in wastewater treatment plants

of the united states, fouad? >> to be honest with you, charlie, i wouldn't have given mr. maliki the meeting with president obama, i think it was a mistake. the idea you have this man now running for a third term in iraq. he had a term in 2006 as a compromise candidate, he then had another term in 2010 as a prime minister, when he was in the top vote recipient, he subverted the process and he then put himself forth for a third term in 2014. this is part of his campaign, and there is something -- he is a lucky man, in order to run for this illegal, in my opinion, third term, as a candidate of the supreme leader in iran, president obama in washington and of bashar al-assad in syria, it is an amazing work if you can get it. this war, which i believe it was a noble war that is my belief in it and you were kind enough over the years to give me a kind of a forum for this, but this noble war has got ten a tyrant. >> rose: robin wright? >> well, the prime minister al maliki wants more weapons from the united states, he i

to rely on the united states to get the best possible deal with iran. but there are a couple of problems that i want to mention. one is that there is enough erosion between prime minister netanyahu and president obama. this has entered the equation to some extent. that's number one. number two as we heard before, the building measures are unnecessary. the question is this, if iran has been maintaining that it has not pursuing nuclear weapons, then it should be able to provide the international community the iea the inspectors truly inspections everywhere. that is a were requisite. yes, they insist on enriching on iranian soil. about "y" not freeze that for another six months until another agreement is reached and a more comprehensive one that deals with that issue effectively. which means if they want to lift some of these heavy sanctions that have really penalized their economy and they're hurting, they're going to have to do something to demonstrate that they are sincere, and they really mean business, that they have not pursued nuclear weapons, and b

the united would never have become involved in the vietnam war. that is really one of the great legacies of foster dulles personally. ho chifailed to topple minh, they then went on to another leader in the neighborhood in indonesia. his great crime was to embrace an ideology that the dulles brothers to tested almost as .uch as bolshevism that was neutralism. they were trying to undermine the entire foundation of the cold war by saying, countries don't have to choose between moscow and washington. we are not involved in this conflict. that drove foster dulles and allen dulles crazy. their idea was, our policy is global. he called neutralism and moral. .- immoral he insisted that they show they were pro-american otherwise he would assume they were anti- american. they fomented a major civil war in indonesia in the meat -- mid- 1950's. it failed but it created tensions that exploded during the 1960's and led to a horrific massacre in which about one million indonesians were killed. another neutral list who emerged in the world during this. and the co

united states from the united kingdom from france from the european union so we're dealing with a very different world than of course the israelis also disprove your point the israelis would love to annex the west bank and create what they call eretz israel but they are prevented from doing so by the knowledge that that would probably use the israeli regime so changing borders by force. and i don't think it is and i say that and i think that you know to think what you really interesting here gentlemen isn't worth what we have to actually looking at it in two different ways we're looking at international law and the united nations which is all nice and fine but charlie facts on the ground are very different ok the kurds are not going to listen to that if they haven't chance for their nation state they're going to go for it iraq is being broken up into three different countries libya is falling apart as well it doesn't matter if the international community recognizes the separation there happening on the ground as we speak go ahead charlie oh yes and i think also facts on the ground also

united states should give military aid to the pakistan. >> i think the united states should not give military aid to pakistan if it is simply going to fuel an arms race between india and pakistan. i think the united states should help pakistan, turns the corner in terms of understanding its position in the world instead of feeding delusions in pakistan. >> rose: do you believe that the isi is protecting in north waziristan the haqqani family. >> i don't think they are actually, they actually have to protect them, because the haqqani network has its own influence and power, i think what they are doing is they are not doing anything to take them out or to weaken -- >> rose: do you think they could if they wanted to, the pakastani military? >> absolutely and they should, they should for the sake of pakistan because look even if pakistan wants influence in pakistan, in afghanistan, they have be friend -- >> rose: so general wanted to take out the haqqani network on the border of afghanistan, he could have? >> he certainly could have. >> and why didn't he do it? >> well, i think that they

the funding and funding from the united states we need to get you back on to talk about after the. what changes we can see made their legacy of. time and space. this week marks the anniversary of the assassination of john f. kennedy but it also marks the birthday of another kind of day one whose life was tragically cut short as well robert francis kind of a he would have been eighty eight years old c r f k was on his way to becoming president after serving as senator for new york attorney general the u.s. and close political partner to his late brother john kennedy over the course of his political career he was always stern in his convictions have been resigned from the senate subcommittee investigation because of then senator joseph mccarthy's intimidation tactics during the red scare during kennedy's tenure as attorney general he launched a campaign against the mafia as organized crime it was a fervent advocate for civil rights in fact it was already paid to deliver the news of dr king's assassination to an almost all black audience and urging the crowd to embrace dr king's messa

for the united states, would it not? >> indeed. >> given that the market would open all of those markets, wouldn't you agree that a vote for ratification is a vote to support american businesses and create jobs here in the united states? >> i think perhaps that's why the chamber of commerce supports the treaty ratification. >> right now, no one from united states is sitting on the disabilities committee. if we had a delegate on that committee, do you think that would help u.s. businesses to expand their markets overseas? >> yes. >> would it not help in creating rules and regulations that would be used in order to expand in other countries? >> one would expect. >> congresswoman duckworth. >> i think the extent of opportunities for u.s. firms is really underestimated right now. we do the adaptive advice industry and it is a charm and display large one and one that we certainly dominate in the world. we are not talking about just phones but wheelchair will -- accessible buses, homeschooling supplies for those who want to te

congress is up to the united states. you can be sure that the administration is extremely strongly committed to this. the leadership and persistence of secretary kerry has been crucial. the clarity of president obama it is very clear. we do not need at this point to start looking at the other scenarios. we do not need to act separately from the united states. >> you can heal to hear more from the british house of commons wednesday. questions at 7:00 a.m. eastern on c-span two. >> tonight -- next, c-span's first ladies. efforts indiplomacy muslim countries. summers.ry ♪ [applause] >> i stay in the wings and do not come out too often. this is quite unusual for me. i do want to thank all of you for your friendship and your loyal support and for the planning of this wonderful evening for me. i shall remember it always. and thanks to the young people for this great welcome.

the united states. what went wrong. >> you saw that. >> this was a privileged guy and his dad was a broadcaster and his mother was a well to do woman. >> when you look back at his life one extraordinary factor david hedley served david hedley. his mother was from maryland and his father was a renowned broadcaster. and every stage of his privileged life he betrayed the friends nearest to him. he eventually was a drug dealer and sold out to work for the dea and a collaboration with the authorities. and near the time when al qaeda rose it's head he offered somethinsomething new to the intelligence community he said what if i get you inside of the movement. >> then he ended up flipping. >> he was working both sides. >> but in this case he ended up working -- >> welcome to al jazeera america we are going to update update yn the breaking news in geneva. a historic deal has been reached over iran's nuclear program. it comes after a marathon that went all day and into the night in geneva that is after days and

spying the united states buying all the european leader areas and also mexico south america everywhere everybody's talking about what has been happening in terms of and as they has been collecting information everybody is parking about what has been targeted all these people have been targeted whether it's desirable or holland or the president of mexico but what we don't have and grab is extremely important because that will be a tremendous what kind of reaction and action you know where to see these countries from these leaders is that her dad and there is extremely important you know that they have been yeah review for me should be not going to be highlighting what we don't know what kind of information our seen and what if you had one hundred police ample yet why be a part of the information they have gathered from the president of mexico if the oreck conversations or conversations with some top drug lords and assuring no immunity or why or why. our prime minister in france is ordering some child pornography you know these are hypothetical examples but this is not a very formation h

i think have led to a real concern both inside the united states and outside the united states about what's happening. what are the decisions of the fisa court. awful those have played a need in the confusion. >> especially when the nsa handles those things so carelessly, they let a 29-year-old subcontractor walk off with all their secrets and as far as i know no one's even been reprimanded for that. mr. bankston, what do you think? >> speaking generally we think transparency is critical to restoring trust in the u.s. internet economy and in the u.s. government itself. but it alone is not sufficient and that indeed substantive reform is necessary. cbp supports the bill you have introduced, u.s. freedom act aand we thank you for it. we look forward to working with you and the committee as it moves forward. >> i'm worried about overclassification. i find oftentimes every administration's been guilty of this. it's easy to classify a secret -- classify a mistake rather than try to explain it. let me ask mr. salgado, are you permitted to tell us whether google's received any fisa court or

iran by the united states. the dire economic situation has forced seron to seek external help china has reportedly agreed to fund a twenty two billion euros in development projects using oil assets previously barred by international sanctions regime in tehran deal in the yuan not the dollar so the sanctions did not affect china's business with its third largest crude oil supplier political analyst side mohammad marandi says america has failed to achieve anything where the sanctions. this is one of many signs that the u.s. imposed sanctions is not working and it's beginning. to fall apart not that the united states wants this to happen the united states wants to make ordinary iranians suffer as much as possible they want to devastate the iranian economy and they've already succeeded in killing people because for example iran has had great difficulty importing medicines so the americans are definitely upset with this but as time goes on we are seeing increasingly countries moving away from the united states compa

the majority in the united states . for the year. because that's what we've been doing for five hundred years we've been scared. all of the monstrosities. europeans have done to us they've exterminated ninety five percent of our population they're still in one hundred percent of our land they've left us in poverty. and many since you throw the us already majority indigenous in a year is a more space the projected to be one it's minority in thirty years that will apply to the united states as a whole reaction of sorts of americans is already causing some surprise seek truth from facts this is the truth eco. is obviously more for the latest because it's pink. women wanted to avoid rate they really needed to buy guns environ how to use them. this is the one that i want to go with them once again it's the field for women definitely the target of the gun lobby the one you don't want to kill but not one to kill anybody but if somebody would he would this with her. i'm noticing more and more if that's really scary marketing ta

growth because the too big to fail banks of the united kingdom of the united states they're just zombie banks are gobbling up all this money and they're returning growth they're keeping a lid on growth and until you get rid of them you won't have any growth now the n.s.a. spying scandal when it emerged it was revealed that national spy agency across the world are actually spying on behalf of the n.s.a. is this the same case for central banks are the bank of england and the e.c.b. working in effect for the fed wolf well that's an excellent question and. i wish i or i said he won the fed someplace to do you know they are to transfer they one thing we know for sure. who the fed is working for the fed is working for the companies that own it and the fed the federal reserve system the united states is owned by private companies and they run it and so the fed will do what what's best for these companies and includes goldman sachs and all the big banks around the country and some institutions like general electric and this for money also and iran and so whether the other central banks work for