at this point arrest commissioner president wu commissioner fong commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore and commissioner richards we do expect commissioner johnson. >> commissioners first on our agenda is consideration of items proposed for continuance at the release of agenda there were none we have a request from commissioner richards to continue item 16 for case at 4 6127th street a request inform discretionary review to a date to be determined and item 15 for case at 37 there 68 fillmore request for a discretionary review have been withdrawn. >> so you should tomato take up the matter both the dr requester has asked. >> we have a number of public comment cards sorry i can't read this handwringing. >> good afternoon commissioner president wu and commissioners my name is michael i'm the dr filer i'm a resident of the at 47927 of the in the historic district in addition i'm a preservation architect practicing thirty years in san francisco i come to this hearing with professional knowledge we respectfully request the continuance for the hearing the documents you have

. >> commissioner hillis. >> i'm okay with that only the holiday it makes me nervous i mean the fourth of july is a holiday not on the the monitored usually and and the halloween. >> friday and saturday night and new years eve. >> thank you i don't like it. >> oh, then san francisco holidays gay provide sunday (laughter). >> all right. let's see with what the commissioners say i'll be concerned about the holidays. >> i can change the motion. >> change to new years eve. >> yes. he says new years eve and gay presiding sunday. >> a that's a sunday night but i don't know whether the commissioners want to include that. >> we'll continue with the commissioners comments. >> commissioner richards. >> we identified the specific holidays highlighting the specific i think i'm happy with new years eve and gay provide sunday's are there other holidays i ask to amend to gay pride sunday. >> commissioner johnson. >> i'm sorry i don't want to extend this i know we're getting out of here another 5 i don't like being random and to me i like thanksgiving eve i like to go out and help with the digestion s

. >> commissioner hillis. >> i'm supportive of this even though it's at same letters but others have made offer a good point of view we're fighting the battles coming later can you explain there's a natural areas plan eir how does that fit in with the next phases of this planning process? >> so there is a natural eir from the rec and park department that affects what has been mentioned a lot of the tree he removal on the use of herb's that eir will be coming before i in the next year for approval and in terms of pursuing a parks plan some of the outcome from those decisions will feed into my kind of policy documents and but that's a separate kind of process that rec and park are taking as a natural plan. >> yeah. >> so, i mean i get meantime we bring up trees we start getting into those natural area for first trees i get it people are passionate on both sides it's clear we're tarnishing street trees and other vegetation nor the tree canopy citywide but this is about street trees and i'm clear on that i think others two are but tend to want to model it into the issues of the natural p

the entire package so that's fine the other thing on the financing mechanism i agree a commissioner hillis the best way to fund programs especially the ones that benefit the property value there was a lot of work done around that how much money and other things but very little done on other methods of raising funds for street tree program that are not program i want to see a rounding out having 2 pages on parcel tax and two sentences on the community benefit district or other mechanisms to me seem not the best that we can do so that's but - so i'll actually add to the motion or suggest the analysis you've done on other mechanisms do we need to add that to the motion about the asterisk. >> i apologize the city attorney for some comments at this moment. >> deputy city attorney marla burn i'm like an ordinance where the board of supervisors change before the board the general plan can only be approved - well, i'll classify the general plan words gets approved that i the body and the board of supervisors gets an up and down voted on what's recommend so unless the commission articulated line dw

plan on november 6, 2014, after hearing and close the public comment it is continued and commissioner hillis and commissioner fong against. >> good afternoon, commissioners i'm john sawyer with the department staff at our hearing on the uttering plan street trees the commission directed the staff to return the first was a glossary of key terms in the urban forest plan and the second a motivation of property and non-property based mechanisms to fund a citywide street tree program both were included in the memo in our packet this included did glossary for trees street trees and uttering and under story and vegetation and are greg greening and economical funding those suggestions were made from the uttering definition and others defines from the public works code and the better street plan the funding sections we included the property and non-property mechanisms we've identified on the property based the parcel tax and on the non property general funds and urban forest joint powers authority and based on the plan to make sure that the plan focused on street trees was clear so ya for the record

i need to ask for a are you custodial i live on the same block. >> move to recuse commissioner hillis. >> on that motion commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner richards commissioner fong and commissioner president wu thank you, commissioners you are here by recused. >> good afternoon mary radius woods of departmental staff this is for a prior conditional use authorization that was approved in 2007 in order for the sponsor to extend the hours of operation from an overnight shelter to a daytime street light the cu is required because the project site is in a residential place a they've addressed the issues and some of the issues already incorporated in the draft motion under the conditions of approval such as a loiter and garbage cans and liaisons the neighbors have raised the additional noise in the backyard so if the commission would like to explores that as a condition it probation officer would be up to the commission to make the recommendation the departments recommendation to approve with conditions since last week the department has 28 letters

. >> commissioner hillis. >> so just to clarify the scope is limited that the puc is cleaning up this site and it's great for ou were talking about the future and specific the gun club are not for the merits of the remediation plan but we're asked to do whatever the environmental review is adequate and i think other things will happen and hopefully, they'll happen at the puc so i'm fine with the mitigated deck and move to uphold that. >> second and commissioner johnson. >> thank you very much so i agree with commissioner hillis although i'll enter into commentary on the record as to why just really quickly first of all, there were comments in writing and today, the length of the preliminary mitigated negative declaration and the response to comment is an indicator this is so much wording there should be an eir the purpose the negative declaration is to say if you do the mitigations your proposing you'll mitigate an environmental impact and therefore not needing an environmental impact report for the impacts that are invadeable it's the point of a night e mitigated negative impact so i

. >> commissioner hillis. >> i agree i don't see anything extraordinary kind of the front deck maybe you can address i think and i agree with the commenter we see a lot of 0 boxes we set back them 15 feet their supposing not available but take up 15 foot with the deck. >> the 15 feet the neighborhood has windows on the property line we had to push the front of the building up to 15 feet to allow for the windows to maintain daylight and air so in addition to the neighborhood. >> you said do front of the on top of box is set back 15 feet. >> the addition is set back 15 feet. >> we were able to build closer to the property line if not for the windows on the neighbors property line. >> no, i get it so that's all i don't know if there's this is going to take off the deck but it kind of enhances i even it's good to at the time e set it back 15 feet the point is not see the third floor addition. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. i can sort of see what commissioner hillis is saying but basically our eye probably as long as the deck is pretty flat there's a clear railing there; is that corre

i'd like to take roll commissioner president wu commissioner fong commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore and we do expect sociocommissioner johnson's and commissioner richards to arrive first on our agenda is for the case for the agenda the 2013 nexus study to december lovingly, 2014 item 2 for case at 1423 oefgs a may or may not discretionary review until 2015 i don't believe i have speaker cards but. >> we'll go ahead is there any public comment for items proposed for continuance? okay seeing none, public comment is closed commissioner moore >> move to continue items one and two as noted. >> second. >> on that motion to continue items one and two commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner fong commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero and places you in our consent calendar constitute a consent calendar, are considered the planning commission, and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission, there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the comm

. >> commissioner hillis. >> so, i mean i can support a continuance we need direction we're hearing things from the neighborhoods my kids go to ma kindle some people want to keep the building as is i'll support a more dense development and walk done straight street it's very dark there are single-family homes but directly across the street the rear building and on to straight street there are more 1930s bulky buildings i'll categories this as architecture not small cottages this doesn't realize to the extraordinary circumstances i can see the impact somewhat smaller building adjacent to it it seems like the massing works better with the building on the audio again we've seen this before and depraved them if you want to continue i know the goal it work with some of the neighbors that are adjacent that's the impacts to the neighbors increase going to be impacts you're going from a small single-family home to ta a large-scale it's not inconsistent with what's said i'll vote for a continuance this doesn't rise to extraordinary circumstances that's my point. >> i can also support of the continu

. >> my seconder was commissioner hillis. >> are you holding to those moechgz commissioners, if there's nothing further dollars then there's another motion that was sejtd e seconded with the conditions as amended to include that an id reader and signage be played in front of the building no loitering and limiting the hours of operation to 10 p.m. and establishing a liaison with that information posted and 5 that a six months look back be required and commissioner antonini no commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards no commissioner fong commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes 5 to 2 about commissioner antonini and commissioner richards voting against arrest commissioner wil5 minute break. >> welcome back to the san francisco regular meeting for november 6, 2014, conversions we left off under your conditional use calendar for case d at 520 this is a request for quality of life. >> members of the planning commission the project before you locked on the boulevard proposes to lift the building to insert a second level to

. >> commissioner hillis i mean, we'll see what we get you like the design it reflects the industrial character there are a big lot so, i mean i keep it in the design and come up with an alternative but how it turns into ralph street how you make the turn but i like it. >> commissioner moore. >> we're not supposed to argue it looks like delores and market street we a restatement of the approach to the building and we had other buildings to choose no arithmetic and names as mentioned but spend a little bit more time of the creative aspect. >> commissioners there's a motion and second to continue this matter to december 18th commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner fong commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero commissioners that place you on item 16 for case at 36 hundred graer boulevard a request for conditional use authorization. >> good evening commissioner president wu laura the project before you is a confusion to establish a formula retail cbs moderate sca

take roll at this point commissioner president wu commissioner fong commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson is here commissioner moore and commissioner richards that present as well commissioners first on our agenda is consideration for items promoted for continuance there are several so bear with me item one the 2013 nexus study proposed for december 4th, 2014, not november 13th and case two the reasonable modification academies to the planning code to for continuance and the next at 36 hundred geary conditional use authorization is for december 30th, 2014, and item four zoning math amendment on portland avenue is proposed until december you figure out 2014 and items for case 2014567 b and c at moigs e mission street discretionary review authorization and our proposed for indefinitely continuance and item 6 at 1805 mason street discretionary review authorization conditional use authorization has been withdrawn and further item 1799 d on delores street a molester discretionary review we've asked to continue this matter indefinitely i have no speaker cards. >> thank you

are not to take conditional use and approve a commissioner antonini commissioner johnson commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner fong and commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you on item 14 at 590 page street a request for discretionary review. >> good evening of any person(s) responsible for the ringing or use of a arrest the item before you is a request for discretionary review the proposed project includes the don't guess of 2 thousand square feet started in 1992 and the construction of two residential buildings totally 12 units the four buildings will be 4 stories in height with off-street spaces and bicycle spaces the project clouds one on site affordable housing in the planning code section the four buildings will include the foreman from 54 hundred to 59 hundred square feet with a maximum height of - 13 to 15 hundred square feet and all will have 3 bedrooms. >> the proposal includes the subdivision of 4 lots and in the rh1 zoning per lot are permit it is locked on the northwest corner c

want to do that. >> so noted. >> i never know. >> on that motion commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner richards commissioner fong no commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes that planning commission motion passes 5 to one with commissioner fong voting against expirations that places you on general public comment i have no speaker cards is there any general public comment? >> you may. >> when we were planning after all there were 8 houses we live in two house near the area all the houses are the same it has a living room and diagram not a bedroom and the reason i know hal la i handled her real estate and she's had the back unit where it says all utilities will be paid by her, she knew you it was adjacent to her unit before all of this started we actually called liz to the planning department i have a voice recording that told us what to do we went into down to the planning department they said we need the report fixed the inspector looked at the property and investigated if better than to get the building cards from 891 to 1

commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner fong commissioner president wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you on items 11 ab for x and v at 690 market street you'll consider a request for conditional use >> good afternoon commissioner president wu and members of the commission commissioner burns of any person(s) responsible for the ringing or use of a for a request for downtown project authorization at a rear yard at 690 market street the project sponsor wants to convert 29 time-share with the existing 24 story residential hotel arrest as part of the downtown authorization the commission may grant 30 years the outstanding overlay design the exemption for the planning code section 34 it requests variances from the planning code one hundred for 40 for one denial he did not recommends approval it's located in a historic building for a compliant wrashd or radishes anothers project sponsor has purchased light and your facilities project is consistent with the objectives and

president wu commissioner fong commissioner antonini commissionerichards we do expect commissioner hillis and commissioner johnson momentary commissioner first on our agenda is proposed items for continuance item one at 1814 through 16 ann district attorney request for conditional use authorization and item 2 at 2312 market street request for conditional use authorization until november 13th he have no other items proposed for continuance and no speaker cards. >> okay any public comment on this item? for items proposed for continuance? seeing none, public comment is closed commissioner fong >> move to continue. >> second. >> on that motion to continue commissioner antonini commissioner johnson commissioner richards i can only vote on the tennessee i actually the market street one i'm living within 5 hundred feet i'll not be vociferating or participating that. >> in this case can we change the motion to - >> move to continue item 1. >> second. >> thank you commissioner antonini on that motion to continue item one. >> commissioner antonini commissioner johnson commissioner richards commissi

forward to have it approved by the planning commission or the board of supervisors i think commissioner hillis. >> i think given this is allowed in an industrial area and not require a fee in this adjacent area and maybe i'm not comfortable requiring the if upper recommending that because we have not looked this in detail so maybe we require or make a recommendation that the board look at the possible of having a cu. >> commissioner richards. >> yeah. my concern is not with the manufacturing but the tasting i've not driven counsel the corridor those are things that need to be looked at in terms of the tasting not the manufacturing. >> to answer that question when it was rezoned with the lastly pdr district this was a district included pdr that stance for the buffer that buffers the industrial use i don't believe that industrial use t is allowed. >> it addresses my concern. >> thank you commissioner johnson. >> thank you very much i'd be willing to amend it to the board of supervisors looking at it i definitely my intent was knowing the board of supervisors rule they change the legislation, how