new scrutiny over clinton's time in the state department and gives impression that the clintons tend to play by their own rules. it instead went overseas. a private e-mail account and server could allow e-mails between then secretary clinton and foreign leaders to be permanently deleted. that's put new scrutiny on the clinton foundation a charity that is founded by the clintons to address poverty and gender inequally. >> look across the blue see all the challenges. >> the foundation is highly regarded among development experts and well-funded. since 2001 it has received nearly $2 billion from private donors and governments including saudi arabia and oman. >> despite limits, seven foreign governments in total while she was secretary of state. now those contribution he picked up after she left office and started her second bid for the presidency. >> the real challenge to democracy comes if the gifts to the nonprofits and the an anonymity they allow. >> there have been no specific allegation of misconduct against clinton other than this potential breach of e-mail protocol and the clinto

neera you worked in the clinton white house. you worked for senator clinton. how do you answer mark? >> i would say that she doesn't see herself as above the law, and that's why -- or different from everyone else. that's why she was following previous secretary of states and now she's going above and beyond. i think it's fascinating how there is people who can read every view of hillary. i was talking to hillary back in 2009. she didn't say she was ever going to run for president again back then and i think that she's presumptions of nefarious activities are just that, presumptions. and now we'll know because she's putting forward her e-mails -- >> this is i think, what bugs people. that the rules were pretty clear. your e-mails should be preserved. you really think when they wrote preserved, i'm not talking about breaking the law. i'm talking about her spokesman said living up to the spirit and the letter of the law you think that's with keeping of the spirit if you don't turn these over while you're secretary of state you don't turn them over when you leave

you worked in the clinton white house and worked for senator clinton, how do you answer? >> she doesn't see herself as above the line or different from everyone else. that is why she was following the rules as the previous secretary of state and is putting forward an e-mail which is going above and beyond. it and fascinating how people can read every view of her and in twine she was not thinking they would run for president again and the presumption of nefarious activity are just that presumption. >> and the rules were clear, the maims -- rules were clear, living up to the spirit and the letter of the law. is that in keeping with the spirit you do not turn these over while secretary of state when you leave as secretary of state you do not turn them over until two years of leave and after the state department lawyers confront you? >> that is also faster than any rest secretary of state has turned over e-mails. obviously she fund over the mail the previous secretary of state did not turn over. >> jerk josh uses the government e-mail so they are contemporaneously preserved.

bill clinton and donated $1 million to the clinton foundation. he says hillary would be a good president if she runs. he's still a conservative. he runs news max and plans to support gop nominee, whoever it is. this gives unique insight into clinton critics and how she can counter that. joining me from florida, good morning. >> brian, good to be on with you. >> i know people are always fascinated by the evolution in your relationship to the clintons let's say. how do you explain it? >> well it's a long story. i was very close friend with ed koch former mayor of new york. he introduced me to bill clinton i really started to warm with bill clinton after he left the presidency when i started seeing what his foundation was doing and work he was doing as a post president. he really reinvented the job of being a post president. and i think, and i'm still a very big supporter of the foundation bill hillary, chelsea foundation. they are doing amazing work. i have always found it to be very, very nonpartisan. they have extremely competent people. there's

run and where bill clinton's head is at? >> her head is that it's her term. that's the major rationale. i've paid my dues and put up with a lot of crap. i've put up with bill. it is my turn. bill says she is my wife and gives me the opportunity to be in the white house again. those were great times. let's do it again. for bill, it's like the rolling stones doing a tour at age 70. he wants to go back on the road. >> if she runs, you want her to be the next president. >> absolutely. whoever the democrat is, i want them to win. >> have you heard from other democrats about what you said? >> several indicated that she needs to be tested. if she gets through a tough primary and wins, fine. this entitlement, this anointment, this coronation is not good for the party. i had lunch with a woman today that said it's time we had a woman, and you shouldn't be attacking hillary and made it very clear that she thought i ought to back off. she is entitled to her opinion and i'm entitled to mine. >> mr. chairman, thank you for joining us. >>

not unlike hillary clinton. but what the sources who i'm talking to here who are close to jeb bush are saying that they're looking for is her explanation of why she used that e-mail that personal e-mail exclusively, and why it took until now to release them when they think that they have a nice jux position between that and the fact that he on his own released hundreds of thousands of e-mails to the public just a couple weeks ago. so certainly democrats are trying to say, a-ha you see, jeb bush has a private server. jeb bush e-mailed on private e-mails. it's not only democrats, it's not only hillary clinton. but they're arguing it's actually a case study in how different kinds of politicians handle this issue in a very different way. >> we're looking at live pictures from the microphone over there. that's where hillary clinton will be walking over momentarily, we're told making a statement, then answering reporters' questions. we don't know if it will be one or two or three questions or a whole bunch of question

clinton: the system we used was set up for president clinton's office. it had numerous safeguards. it was on property regarded -- and guarded by the grid service and there were no security breaches. john:, you just talked about the questions you feel she satisfied. what were those that you feel she did not satisfy? market: there were plenty. did she consult the state department? even the documents they put out said they cannot say who they consulted with because it is a matter of security. number two, this question of the freedom of information act and subpoenas. there is some indication that if she e-mails someone outside the government, she made an effort to archive that. but it is not comprehensive. that is one of the most serious things about it. and the last big thing that she did not address was what was her plan for turning these things over before the state department asked? john glenn and she assumed the -- john: and she assumed the server was secure because it was the same one her husband use. she asserts there was never a security breach. i don't know that is true, or th

@blahblah clinton@blahblah clinton@blahblahblah@ clinton@blahblahblah@ clinton@blahblahblah@us.com. >> federal law regarding the use of personal e-mail to do government business changed in 2014, after hillary clinton left her secretary of state post. it is now officially illegal to use a nonofficial e-mail account to conduct public business. unless an employee copies their official e-mail account on the correspondence or forwards a complete copy of the personal account within 30 days. but agencies allowing employees to do business on nonstate department e-mail accounts had to ensure that any records were preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system. this is where it gets really murky. i think we would have faith that all of those isn't over to the archives. and when you add to that, that apparently mrs. clinton and her staff or her staff didn't automatically hand over those e-mails as required, but only after requested to do so, there seems to be a lot more questions still to come. let me know what you think, you can finding my take on my facebook page and at foxnews.com.

jeb bush said good for you, you got bill clinton. he normally will not talk about the clintons. can see he is looking for the jugular. >> and not a big political attack, just an elliptical thing. when is hillary going to take shots at jeb? here is what the clinton camp is actually concerned about. it's the gray lady herself on a scale of one to godzilla how big of a problem is the times for hillary clinton? >> a pretty big problem. the clintons and the new york times have had a historic nemesis like relationship going back to the whitewater stories. the last time hillary ran for president there was a huge blow up over a story about the clintons personal life. there was a big reader backlash about in that story. i do not trust the new york times. there is evidence the new york times is going to put a lot of reporters on this door it can be >> investigative reporters, certain columnists -- put a lot of reporters on the story. i know if there is an irony, that the republicans best friends when the times writes an investigative piece about the clintons, it harkens back to the age wh

this is different if you're hillary clinton. you have a history of office-gating, hiding things and being hyper protective. this is going to be a big problem for hillary. this is not a scandal yet. this is not a candle physical they find something out in these e-mails. >> i want to get back to your point that hillary clinton and the clintons themselves have been under investigation dating back to the white house and white water. is there anybody in washington or in the political circle that believes that knowing that everything they do and say is really under the microscope that she would be so foolish would be the worders to put word, to put something in an e-mail that she would need to erase. >> you would think that if anyone was sensitive to this woulden hillary clinton, but she does not have to public opponent. she's not in the race herself. she is protective, private and wants no transparency, this is a jumping point of that for her. she tried to hide that part of it but making news, as you alluded to, del talking about the

clinton and his office. his office get taxpayer money as all former presidents do. i have talked to democratic source hostel me a little new information that actually the server was paid for by bill clinton out of his own pocket. so that would suggest a taxpayers do not own it. >> the problem with that when they do it privately and use their own money and own server, you can't access that stuff through foia. there is a shield. in order to get that information you really need a federal subpoena. >> right. but a subpoena through congress as well is possible is all i'm saying. now you have at least two different republican chairman saying they are trying to get at. there was another big disclosure today with jen psaki that i think is new as well. she said look it wasn't until this past february that we started automatically archiving emails for state department why is that significant. former secretary hunk a lot of this on the idea okay i used a personal account but i knew i was emailing my aides who had state

foundation while hillary clinton was secretary of state. we know that that fund took in hundreds of millions of dollars, some of it coming from foreign donors. our next guest is trying to find out exactly what was going on. matt whitaker is a former u.s. attorney and executive director of the foundation for accountability and civic trust a self-described watchdog organization. matt, thank you for being here. a column this week said basically follow the money, he'd been told by a close clinton confidant that that's what you need to do according to a clinton source follow the money to figure out why there's an e-mail controversy why they're missing in the first place. that's what you're trying to do. >> right. we know that the clinton foundation has disclosed most of their donors. we know that while secretary clinton was at the state department she -- the foundation raised millions of dollars from foreign sources including $500,000 from the country of algeria that was in contra vengs of the agreement she had with the state department not to r

clinton speaking at the u.n. event about you -- about women's empowerment, i want to bring in mark from "with all due respect your quote -- "with all due respect." mark h: we will see how many questions she takes. they do feel pressure within her camp to deal with it. mark c: peter, mark just talked about the pressure within her camp. if you watched some of the sunday talk shows, some democrats have been asking mrs. clinton to speak out because they feel they have been forced into the position to have to defend her actions. what are they saying now? peter: i mentioned senator dianne feinstein, someone who has been aligned with hillary clinton. i have spoken with other democrats you don't think this will be a huge issue. at least that is what they say privately. but they realize it will become a bigger issue until she confronted directly. so there is pressure coming from democrats for heller jury -- for hillary, if you will to come clean. yes, she is facing pressure from democrats as well. mainly, it is republican

clinton. >> since then the end justifies the means. we are seeing it here with taking foreign donations from terrorist supporting countries that suppress the rights of women and setting up a secret e-mail account to dodge transparency regulations and potentially expose sensitive e-mail information to foreign threats. >> reporter: clinton warned the next 20 months to election day will probably be harder than ever and slammed republicans for proposing tax cuts. >> we're not buying that old trickle down economics that didn't work before and can never work again. >> reporter: last year's book tour attempt to rework her image got lousy reviews. she was ridiculed for saying she and her husband were broke after presidency. while she was secretary of bill clinton raked in $38 million for speaking fees. former have been raising millions in organizing volunteers for more than a year. lawsuits alleging that have already been filed. a candidate's character and past can often decide a race. these are probl

. >> what you see are the clintons behaving badly. it is always something with the clintons. they have roles which they describe before they get into something, and then they decide they don't have to follow their own rules. i will be talking to one nominee about the mistakes i made an suggesting things here she should do differently than i did. that's pretty straightforward. campbell: you what it said it differently? >> i don't think i've lost any votes. campbell: is it good to have met romney hovering over this campaign. mark: he can rev up the base. there is something here that makes me a little nervous with those answers that he might make the prospective nominees nervous. campbell: i think he is nothing but outside -- upside. he was demonized during his campaign. when you saw him your member the documentary, they took him outside of the campaign context. mark: the downside is that if he does not like the person who is heading to be the nominee and he intercedes, that could throw the planets alignment off. campbell: there are voters who have buyers remorse now. his presen

clinton's benefit at all. yes, partisans on the left will vote for her no matter what but there are millions of americans in the middle. the exception now is that hillary clinton is not a standup person. she does not put forth the whole truth and nothing but the truth it is true that mrs. clinton has at times been treated unfairly. overall she has been the beneficiary of soft treatment by the media however, that's beginning to change. the email situation has embarrassed the press which largely supported her in the past. it's safe to assume that mrs. clinton will not get the same treatment by president obama hot press continues to idolize. therefore, her road to the white house will be more difficult. that's the memo. now for the top story tonight. as we predicted last night. there will be lawsuits in the case. today the associated press filed suit in washington d.c. demands will state department turn over emails from tenure secretary of state especially concerning ben laden raid. the being stonewalled by the s

clinton helped. hillary and bubba will tell you the two are not related but you and i both know otherwise. according to "the wall street journal" secretary of state clinton arranged numerous sweetheart deals with foreign entities on behalf u.s. corporations. that's not necessarily a bad thing. but what happens next is. according to "the wall street journal" many of these companies followed their clinton broker deals with donations to the clinton foundation. consider this, mrs. clinton lobbied the algerian government for ge to build power plants after a multi-billion dollar deal was done ge donated heavily to the clinton foundation. then there's boeing which dropped $900,000 into the foundation after securing a $3.7 billion deal with russia. again, thanks to lobbying from clinton. in fact, at least 60 companies lobbied the state department during her tenure donated more than $26 million to the clinton foundation. the clintons nothing to see here act is offensive. they think the laws don't apply to the

are. >> yes, the clinton foundation. and we should not be accepting money. it's considered bribery. it's considered they're buying time. they are publicly executed in the streets of saudi arabia. women aren't allowed any rights whatsoever. education, they're educating them but not allowing them to drive. what type of human rights is this? she had said in 1995 in beijing that human rights are womens rights and womens rights are human rights. i would like to ask mrs. clinton where have you been since thousands of women, especially in the middle east have been mass slaughtered, our young girls are being sold into sex slavery, we're being beheaded, they're being treated like worse than animals. where have you been if you're an advocate for womens rights? i believe those are just words. i do not believe anything she says. i do not believe she's a human rights advocate. i don't believe a lot of things she says. and honestly accepting millions of dollars worth of foreign donations is horrible. and she's contributing to these cr

now does hillary clinton have to go out and apologize for being married to bill clinton? she made fully clear that she comeplyied with federal laws. she's on record. she has a simple explanation for using her personal e-mail. >> when i got to work as secretary of state, i opted for convenience to use my personal e-mail account, which was allowed by the state department because i thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for my personal e-mails instead of two. looking back it would have been better if i had simply used a second e-mail account and carried a second phone, but at the time this didn't seem like an issue. >> now is there kind of a generation gap here a little bit? i would venture to say that not everybody in mrs. clinton's demographic is tech savvy or wants to be bothered with the latest and the greatest in technology. i think i might be in that -- i think many americans are in that same category and i think every american can understand that personal and private e-mails are important to them. why? because they involve other people, ot

is it just that anything hillary clinton or bill clinton does is just accepted as okay of no what they do? >> by the way, that's not a leading question. go ahead. >> it's pretty staggering isn't it? >> well, they had to know that she was using this account because they saw where the e-mails were coming from. they saw her account. >> right. >> they knew where they were kor spoending with. she did not even have a state department account. there was no hillary clinton state department account. it was only this personal account. >> are you sure? >> no they say. >> i'm serious. >> the state department said there was no state account. john kerry is the first secretary of state in the history of the united states to have a government e-mail account. that is what the state department said. colin powell used personal e-mail. and that is part of the argument that hillary clinton's side made they said well, colin powell did this. it was sort of common practice. we did it. and you know a lot of our e-mails that she was sending were being sent to state department people so we thought they were gett

clinton. i don't know if he was self conscious or wondering what this person was going to do or what the circumstance was but no we didn't get close. >> nelson the portrait gallery says the painting is still in rotation it's just not being displayed at this moment. do you believe them? >> not at all. no. the painting was removed apparently one of the curators came through or game through and said the clintons had not liked the painting therefore they had it removed. the man made the mistake of also saying that the clintons commissioned the painting which is entirely untrue. it was the official painting commissioned by the national portrait gallery with funds they had donated and there is only one. there may be a million portraits that little people or people had sent in for one reason or another but only one official portrait that was commissioned by the national portrait gallery, that's it. >> would you like to paint secretary clinton? >> oh, absolutely. i think she's a charming lady. we had

this is the clintons and they do it out of political protection. you can see the democrats staying in line with the clintons, but instead of giving her a benefit of the doubt. but does she answer with their questions and do we hear more murmurs and comments 24 hours from now? can she satisfy her own party? >> if she try to say others did it that is like saying other people robbed a bank and that is okay for me and doesn't sell. >> good to see you both. >> the other big news today it. republican senators writing a letter to iran's leader saying the deal made by the obama administration can be wiped away by the congress. and the democrats and white house are outraged. and ed henry has more on this story. ed? >> reporter: we heard from president obama lashing out and saying that the republican senators may blow up nuclear talks with iran and vice-president biden who served in the senate for decades used personal experience to lash out to the gop saying in part. the letter sent by 47 senators to islamic republic of iran is especially under cutting a si

clinton campaign? >> no. >> reporter: with state now in possession of 55,000 e-mails the process of examining them for production to the select benghazi committee may have gotten morardue s. it is found she had plenty e-mail sdreszs all outside the department's secure system. >> as an intern in 2004-2005, with the lowest possible level security clearance i was given a classified e-mail account. even at that level there is a degree of accountability and an expectation that employees are going to handle information appropriately. as to the fox news poll whether clinton is honest and trust worthy 44% said yes. a majority of 52% said no. sensing she is wounded others are stepping in. maryland governor has a packed schedule of speaking engagements in new hampshire. vice president spoke to the human rights campaign. the liberal huffington post features this piece headlined the answer vote senator warren in 2016. the "new york times" reported that last august senior state department officials held negotiation

on the democratic side, it is hillary clinton. who is very capable of getting into a political fight when she wants to. right now there is no one for her to punch. we haven't really seen anything like this before in modern politics so no one really knows what will happen, no one knows how you do this when you have the whole field to yourself and you don't really have primary opponents, how do you campaign for the presidential nomination? well, turns out we're learning the answer to that question is mostly you just don't bother. other than her paid speeches not open to the public or press, she has done a grand total of two public speeches in the entire year of 2015 so far. the first was a week ago at a women and tech event in silicon valley. the second one is tonight. which is why we're paying so much attention. why this is a live feed of what is going on at that event. that is gabrielle giffords and her husband mark kelly there. it is notable and news worthy because of the fact that secretary clinton has not been doing political s

clinton wiggle room there. the intent behind the law for someone as smart as hillary clinton is obvious. we want integrity in the record-keeping process. the gate keeper should be the state department, not the individual who is working for the u.s. taxpayers in this case, of course mrs. clinton. so the problem with the analysis is it's the transparency, it's for historical purposes. it's for congressional year sight purposes. that the individual who is subject to the regulation is not determining what emails are preserved and what emails are not preserved. >> if she chose to go private, which she did, i think collin paul did some of that too when he was secretary of state. she had to preserve them all. i don't think there is any debate about that. but the clinton people say she did. and has handed over everything. >> we don't know. >> and da'da da'da da. >> we don't know what she has preserved. we don't know what she wasn't preserved. that's the reason that any smart person and she went to yale law school. top

. >>> how bad is the hillary clinton e-mail story? >>> just how bad is the hillary clinton e-mail story? >> the state department never came forward with this information. the democratic candidate gives her first remarks since the blockbuster report. we'll bring them to you tonight. "all in" starts right now. >> good evening from new york. i'm chris hayes. after weeks of political jockeying and unprecedented damage, the u.s.'s relationship and with upwards of 50 people boycotting, benjamin netanyahu made his much anticipated and controversial address to congress on nuclear talks with iran today two weeks before elections in israel. ultimately the speech was less an argument against the current deal being negotiated with iran, but rather the inherent evil of the iranian regime. >> iran's regime is as radical as ever. they call america the great satan as loud as ever. this should not be surprising because the ideology of his revolutionary regime is deeply rooted in militant islam. that is why they will always be an enemy of america. >> w

hillary clinton. he's the former special council for president clinton. lanny, good to see you. >> hi megyn. >> first, i know you don't think she did anything wrong here. but i want to ask you whether you know if she did preserve all of the documents that she created and received during her tenure as secretary of state via e-mail? >> well she says she preserved -- excuse my voice megyn, it will be up to the state department and anybody else to confirm she's telling the truth. >> did she say that? i didn't hear her say that in her tweets. >> yes. >> you're telling us she says she did not delete any official documents. >> all preserved. and if deleted you know they can be found. secondly it is a fact that she did nothing illegal. the law actually changed in 2014. and the preservation of those records nothing -- >> that's not true. let me stop you there. that's not true. i've been looking at this, you're a lawyer and so am i, but i've been looking at this for two days and my information is that the law w

clinton. we are right back. rma. checking your credit score is for chumps. i have great credit. how do you know? duh. you know those change, right? tattoos don't change. try credit karma. it's free and you can see what your score is right now. aren't you a little bit curious? i just got my free credit score! credit karma. really free credit scores. really free. i have got to update my ink. i take prilosec otc each morning for my frequent heartburn. because it gives me... zero heartburn! prilosec otc. the number 1 doctor-recommended frequent heartburn medicine for 9 straight years. one pill each morning. 24 hours. zero heartburn. okay, listen up! i'm re-workin' the menu. mayo? corn dogs? you are so outta here! aah! [ female announcer ] the complete balanced nutrition of great-tasting ensure. 24 vitamins and minerals antioxidants and 9 grams of protein. [ bottle ] ensure®. nutrition in charge™. in my world, wall isn't a street. return on investment isn't the only return i'm looking forward to

clinton took questions 30 minutes. those two words came up again and again. >> looking back looking back. >> reporter: these looking ahead to a second presidential campaign and finds herself another political firestorm with republicans smelling new blood. mrs. clinton said she turned over work related e nibl are a-mail to be archived by the state department. >> we asked any e-mail to be identified and preserved that could be potentially federal records and that's what we did and we went beyond that and the process produced over 30,000 you know work emails and i think that we have more than met the request from the state department. >> reporter: this doesn't necessarily put the questions to rest. she acknowledged she was policing herself, making her own determination which emails should be turned over from her time as secretary of state. she said she deleted all personal e-mail and she said she had no plans of turning over the private e-mail server for an independent review. >> i believe i have met all of my responsibil

. >>> plus is hillary clinton too big to fail? >> i opted for convenience to use my personal e-mail account. >> what the roefrscontroversy over her e-mails could mean for the presidential bid and why there is no plan b. >>> and the class divide. we asked americans where they think they belong. are you really middle class? >>> and in the endgame, lindsey graham started it here on "meet the press." >> i don't e-mail -- no you can have every e-mail i've ever sent. i've never sent one. >> now the other washington politicians who admit never taking that bridge to the 21st century. i'm chuck todd. joining me to provide insight and analysis this morning are matt bai of yahoo! news, former hillary clinton press secretary karen finney, my colleague andrea mitchell here at nbc and former senior adviser to mitt romney, kevin madden. welcome to sunday. it's "meet the press." >> from nbc news in washington, this is "meet the press." with chuck todd. >> good morning. the white house is hitting back hard on the issue of iran. late last night the

to by hillary clinton. those are really basic things we have not gotten to the bottom of yet. i suspect this is just the beginning of this controversy, not the end and i think you will see a drip, drip, drip over the next couple of months are on the issue, and i think it will get much worse rather than better unlike many other controversies that seem to go away after a few slow days on the news and then we move on to other things. >> mark halperin jump in here. >> you say you want someone to inspect the server. hillary clinton made it pretty clear she does not plan to give up the server. what would you like to see congressional republicans or anyone else do to change that and get access to it by an independent party to look at it? >> i'm hopeful that may be of these judicial cases may produce an opinion from a court that may allow for a subpoena. it's possible that a committee in congress could get subpoena power, although i understand that that is difficult. congress could possibly get subpoena power over

republican rand paul criticized clinton for applying the double standard. >> i don't think that clinton should be above the law. she said part of the reason why she didn't obey the law was convenience. but i don't think convenience should trump national security. i think there's a little bit of arrogance some of these laws applied to lower people but not to me i'm hillary clinton. >> possible democratic candidates for president including jim webb martin o'malley and bernie sanders did not comment after clinton's news conference. but she did receive support from democratic senator diane feinstein. >> i think the important you thing was she stepped forward and talked to people. and i think people will be reassured listening to it. now, i know this is look the most popular political figure in the country right now. and there is an effort from an opposition party to demean and diminish her anyway they can. i think most people agree personal e-mails should be private material. i mean if i have an e-mail with my husband, i'm not an administration official but if i were should i disclose that?

we really don't know hillary clinton. john: let me interrupt you -- you guys raised not a general question but a specific question about jeffrey epstein. what are the questions you would like to have answered about president clinton's relationship jeffrey epstein? reince: we would like to know what he was doing with him, how many trips he took, what he did with he was with this guy. when you hang out with a guy who has a reputation like jeffrey epstein and you are with a former president multiple times on private jets and weekends and trips on places that at least had been reported not very good things happened, it would be good to know what our former president was doing, especially since it appears as though he will be part of a presidential campaign ticket on the other side of the aisle. john: mark, go ahead. mark: mr. chairman, thank you very much. we appreciate it. lots covered, lots we did not get to. hope to have you back soon. reince: happy to. thank you guys. john: after the break -- again thank you from me, to -

e-mails that clinton decided they should get. >> clinton turned over about 55,000 pages of documents. >> i think 55,000 is a pretty big number. >> it is a big number. there are bigger. >> day two of the trial of the boston bombing suspect, dzhokhar tsarnaev. >> six witnesses called by the prosecution wednesday. most victims of the bombing. >> there was no cross-examination by the defense. >> the jury saw footage from a sporting good store, a window shatters victims flood in. people grab clothes to use as bandages. >> well, here's the deal. we're looking at snow and ice. it is a mess. >> a delta plane skidded off the runway. >> a plane that originated in atlanta. >> laguardia is going to be seeing very limited operations all day today. >> icing is going to continue to be a concern. >> i wanted to build a snowman. >> can you talk us through the fashion of this snowman. oh, no! >> bad roads and airport delays galore. >>> a new 2016 presidential poll taken before hillary clinton's e-mail controversy shows her in a statistical tie with jeb bush within the margin of error, and with a clear

hillary clinton is a known commodity. people who like her are going to like her whether she turns over the emails or not. but it is the 20% in the middle that are going to make the call on who the next president is. and i think the email thing is going to resonate if there is more stuff here. >> it's going to resonate because, look if there was a good answer to the email question, they would have answered it last week. we are now the tenth day into this story. today the cnn reports that hillary clinton will answer questions about this within the next 48 hours. to me that says that they are still trying to figure out not only how to answer the first question but it's the second and third questions that they might not be able to answer. and then you are talking possible real problems, maybe even illegal issues surrounding these emails to moo that's fairly black and white. that guess downtown the trust factor. people may like her very much. that 20% that may be persuadable. >> what else kicks in jennice is you get exhausted,

the funding of the clinton foundation. now you have the cbs news report which says that enterprises pledged $2 million in 2013 to clinton foundation's endowment, the chinese construction and trade conglomerate run by billionaire wenliang. basically it is tied directly to the chinese government. >> it's a big issue. there is a lot of other ways the chinese government and saudis and other ways to help the world if that is what they want to do. they want something out of it. what i really want to see in the e-mails, any e-mail that mentions the foundation and one of the donors. i am really prouded of you for giving james carville such a pass. what carville did was give up the goods. he admitted this was not a matter of convenience. he admitted the reason she did this was so she didn't have to comply with the oversight of the house and with the natural laws of transparency. he gave up the goods. he sold her out. >> charles? >> the chinese donation is particularly troublesome because democrats in the previous campaign implying

>> bill clinton did not. he instead focused on the purpose of the event, which is bringing about 1,000 students from around the world to talk about philanthropy and especially their projects. they each have specific projects they're pitching to clinton foundation trying to get funding. he was on stage earlier today to talk about dealing with the national debt instead of talking about the e-mail controversy or other controversies that have kind of defined the last two weeks for the clintons he focused really more on his record in the white house and on these projects. he said, you know fixing the deficit and the debt isn't that hard and it's only difficult because it's become extremely politicized to deal with that. >> did he take any question from the audience? >> he did not take any questions. it was a short, ten-minute speech on stage with five students and there were no questions. the media was there, but no questions were allowed or we weren't even close enough to ask questions. >> okay. so that's the dif