riley. >> yes. i think it make sense for the developer to work with the entertainment places before they built so that way they can do something about it instead of having the building built and later on having noise. >> commissioner ortiz-cartagena. >> i want to follow-up on the sentiments from the mission district. >> thank you for not ero seeing this and something is paying attention i like to be pro-active. >> i'm curious how will the disputes be monitored i premium there are standards of operation maximum and some noise standards; is that correct. >> sure a lot of those are existing procedures. >> no i think it is great i live in the dog patch and people don't know what they're getting themselves into not standard residential area where this is something if you know about around the corner or down the street awesome thank you, very much do we have an action. >> oh. >> finally oh i'm preying you (laughter). >> commissioner tour-sarkissian. >> i congratulate you for the effort i have some technic

riley. >> yeah. i would like to hear public comment to see whether or not to shed light. >> okay. so there are no other commissioner comments do we have members of the public that would like to comment on this item? >> hi question. i'm available to answer any questions sacramento that from the golden state restaurant association first of all i want to start off we're in support of the street light infrastructure projects they're necessary but at the same time our support of consolidation of public and private projects to minimize time and as far as the economic report or analysis whatever seems to be we really support smoking gun coming before, during and after it is hard to conceptual lists because the projects have helped after their completed making more assessable but as was mentioned small businesses cannot absorb the costs and the beautification for the necessary projects we have to take into account the necessary construction i know we have businesses in in which that has power outages so we're definitely in support of this economic analysis in whole so - >> thank you for c

resolving loan fund with an specializational motivation for the year. >> fantastic. >> commissioner l. riley. >> yeah we you and i interviewed the first interviewer for the secretary position are we're going to have a second one. >> i'll follow-up with you off like that. >> and also i substantiated the meeting with bart the bay area rapid transit along with the director they send 3 people to make a presentation on the plan they gave us i think it was a good meeting you know there's a agreement they will work with the small businesses and the office of small business to share they're planning it will not interrupt the small business. >> what was the context of the - what in what stent a they'll plan in what context. >> the context is coming from the quarterly meeting with the mayor and again talking about the infrastructure projects the mayor encouraged different members those that are interested from that group to meet with the different departments and bart is one of the entities that government entity that deals with infrastructure that the city interfaces or businesses interface wit

riley and commissioner tour-sarkissian arrest mr. president, we have quorum thank you well, welcome to tonight meeting so the first order of business on the agenda is general public comment this allows mustaches to comment generally on matters within the commissions purview and suggest new items are there any new items for consideration >> scott president of the small business commission california. >> hi scott. >> how you doing small business commission along with the federation of the and the handsomely has the ab 1280 what it does basically give a one-day tax holiday on small business right after thanksgiving for your information the tax state tax is 7 and a half cents and san francisco is 8 so san francisco tax on another quarter percent what the hope is that if this passes the state that we can get local jurisdiction the legislation does not require a local jurisdiction to wave the tax that would be a problem if they didn't do it so the idea is to promote small business they're doing something similar in florida it is pending wo

riley commissioner tour-sarkissian commissioner white all right. so then you've unanimously approved that recommendation to be passed on to supervisor tang and to the planning commission so i think that is it for those who are here for item 4 and 5. >> thank you for your input and time it was great input. >> all right. commissioners, i shall move on to item number - yes. >> deanna. >> deanna thank you very much and diego thank you very much appreciate it, it's yours. >> all right. so commissioners we are generally this meeting does have a hard stop at four but the next meeting is detailed so i'm going to just for item number of update on the development and preemption of the legacy program we're not going to get into a detailed discussion i'm highlighting the changes that have been made and passed out of the board of supervisors and then at our april 13th meeting we'll get into the detailed discussions of work on the program and establishing the registry program under item 6 i've already informed you that supervisor campos had taken out of the legi

. >> so commissioner l. riley. >> so is it out pour of discussion (inaudible) more expensive than the petitioner they're basically doing the same thing. >> that's a public health what are you referencing. >> i'm looking at the permit at the it is 1 hundred and 46 for the practitioner. >> those are not combfrnd by the planning code. >> did this include the hotel spaces. >> there are accessory uses in a large hotel that's one of the exemptions i mentioned the planning code has 3 exemptions and that's one mentioned. >> commissioner ortiz-cartagena. >> so in essence i'm just trying so bear with me so if say i'm a warehouse owner and build several studios for out call practitioners to come and practice their trade when they come to the location it's not specific. >> but will they go through a cu process. >> how you're using that space as a massage establishment you'll be required to do a cu and the controls that are proposed from what i understand. >> so from whatever you can use it for your r i don't know. >> so

. >> commissioner l. riley. >> someone mentioned they have to pay for the c mc and the permit pay san francisco the department of public health. >> i want to let you know if you have a c mc practice we don't make them get a permit for a massage it is illegal we don't allow them to have a dual license because of fraud the city can't put ailed requirements on thooefts they don't have to pay if you're a thooefts you don't have to may additional fees to afford the petitioners the only thing changed is the - >> only if you own a business. >> uh-huh. >> what is changing you need to if e and you have a c mc exemption we're turning back the clock to 2009 you have a have a permit it is only for businesses that primarily have the impact where it's heltd not a single massage therapist. >> so only the permit - >> and license from the public health. >> i don't hear a reasonable objection the primarily issue is the cu process being what it is so. >> thank you very much. >> commissioner adams. >> i just not to echo what

riley commissioner tour-sarkissian and commissioner white all right. so now moving on to planning code. >> on this one i'd like to make a representation i'm going to need help here folks i think the amnesty part is very, very important because i did not want people punished who did follow the spirit of the law with the london's through the stated and having to get a new conditional use thank you for your comments earlier reneed to get a cu if you're a massage therapist but if you are already in and grargd you shouldn't have to go authorities cu process that's crazy so. >> did you want to make a motion. >> okay. >> i would make a motion on item 5 to the planning department that you had put in the grandfather anyone that is establishment was opened based on their licensing if the state of california be exempt from this legislation. >> could we add we recommend - >> i just want to make sure i think diego is the right term is maybe legal non-conforming use would that be the right term or. >> you wanted those can you tell me text certified exempt if the cu

riley commissioner white commissioner tour-sarkissian mr. president, we have quorum. >> all right. so first order of business is general public comment the commission except agenda items. the item is reached in the meeting. each member of the public may address the commission for up to 3 minutes. for items not going to be discussed today month by month anybody have new items for consideration seeing none item 3 >> public comment is closed. >> item number 3 a presentation on google small business engagement today commissioners your receiving a presentation from rebecca the public affairs manager google and joe global business with google and adriana the person that oversees the diversity with google and alison is with the diversity section of google sfgovtv i believe we have a power point presentation. >> probably google dots actually (laughter) exactly. >> it is up on the computer not on the screen is that how it - . >> there you go. >> great. >> good afternoon commissioner thank you very much for hosting us today as i was introduced i'm rebecca respect started with google about 6

riley and commissioner tour-sarkissian arrest mr. president, we have quorum thank you well, welcome to tonight meeting so the first order of business on the agenda is general public comment this allows mus

riley and