let me make progress. let me turn to the question of whether there will be grand forces to make this a success. those who say there aren't as many ground troops as they like and they aren't in as many places are correct. we aren't dealing with an ideal situation. let me make a series of important points first. we should be clear what air strikes alone can achieve. we don't need troops to supply oil that funds terrorism. we don't need to hit the infrastructure and supply routes, their training facility, weapons supplies. it's clear, they can have an effect with the issue of kohn and hussein. r.e.f. can do serious damage to daesh's ability right now to bring terror, and we should give them that report. >> thank you, prime minister. how would the prime minister respond to the point that daesh since its attack on its offensive of baghdad was blunted, has actually changed its tactics, dispersed its forces, and particularly, 600,000 people, at best its operations, all throughout that city, into small units, whic

[shouting] >> let me quote some data about the nhs. let me take an average day today compared with five years ago when he became prime minister, on an average there are 4,400 more operations, there are 21,000 more outpatient appointments. yes, there are challenges in a&e but there are 2 thousands 00 more people seen within four hours today than five years ago and there is more data published in nhs than there was in labor. >> mr. speaker, they are largely due to the precious on the adult social care system which is under enormous stress at the moment. indeed, huge cuts in adult social care because of cuts in local government funding. nhs has called for radical upgrade. would the prime minister agree with me that cutting crucial services is a faulty economy? [shouting] >> so that locals can spend more. i notice that the honorable gentleman mentions simon stevens, nhs for the first time got together and wrote their plan. they asked us for a billion pounds. they asked for the money up front and we committed to that plan unlike labour and

chuck, let me just say this. let's be clear. >> okay. >> as a result of a breach caused by the dnc vendor, not by us, information came into our campaign about the clinton campaign. >> magically? wait? magically came there or you had a staffer that got it? >> yes, that's what -- >> you believe it accidentally came in. >> that's not disputed. there was a breach caused by the incompetence of the dnc vendor. that information came into our campaign. first time it came in our staff did the right thing. they said "we have information from the clinton campaign, we don't want this." and they went to the dnc. the second time a staffer or more, we don't know yet, we're doing that investigation, screwed up and we have fired that person. point is the dnc then proposed because of the initial screwup on their part to take away our access to our own information which significantly hampers our campaign. fortunately that has been resolved. >> all right, senator sanders i'll leave it there. i know it was a late night, early morning

me down let me down gently don't want me our love ain't water under the bridge if you're gonna let me down let me down gently don't pretend that you don't want me our love ain't water under the bridge oh say that our love ain't water under the bridge it's so cold in in in in your wilderness i want you to be my but not if you are so reckless ooh if you're gonna let me down let me down gently don't pretend that you don't want me our love ain't water under the bridge down let me down gently don't pretend that you don't want me our love ain't water under the bridge oh oh say it ain't so say it ain't so say it ain't so say it ain't so say that our love ain't water under the bridge oh say it ain't so say it ain't so say that our love ain't water under the bridge say that our love ain't water under the bridge [ cheers and applause ] >> jimmy: oh, come on! that's what i'm talkin' about! hey! "water under the bridge." adele! "25" is on itunes now. and cds and vinyl. we'll be right back, everybody. for lynn's family, the big stress is paying four hundred dollars a month in medical and drug cost

let me through , please! let me through! mayor: oh, my! those are the most beautiful boots i've ever seen! that is the gift, papa! that is what i want for christmas! the red boots! uh, yes, of course, dear. then you shall have them. (bell dings) shoemaker? yes, mayor? how may i help you this fine christmas eve? oh, ho, ho. you are a sly one, shoemaker. christmas eve indeed. i do not understand, mr. mayor. "i have not made a new pair of shoes for quite some time, mr. mayor." (chuckles) you knew i would not find a gift as magnificent as these boots anywhere in friedensdorf, so you waited until christmas eve to get the price up. so, what is your price? i am sorry, mayor, but these boots are not for sale. they are a gift. a gift for my adelaide! now name your price. no! the boots are not for sale, not at any price! (gasping, mumbling) grrr... time to go! yes, i have lots of shopping to do myself. i think i left a teapot boiling. this is not over, shoemaker! i mean to have those boots! (door slams) i could not give up the red boots, aldo. they

let me bring back the panel. robert, let me start with you. cruz was smart enough to know there may have been a recording, so he clearly didn't fall into the trap of denying what he said. what do you make of it? >> he's just waiting for the inevitable. trump's waiting for this fight to happen with cruz. and it seems to be on the rise. >> let me check twitter right now. can we do that? >> you better check real donald trump. >> perry, this was inevitable at some point. they're both trying to win in iowa. >> even is already questioning donald trump's credentials. i don't know if he'll say it immediately, because we're seeing the cruz versus rubio fight right now. >> it is interesting how rubio wants to frame this argument going back to rubio here. but i go back, and anna, i can't -- we were talking about this a little more, but rubio looks like sometimes he's ce d'ing edceding iowa to cruz and i question that. >> you look at the difference on the democratic side, and hillary and bernie both are going there just about every week. certainly iowans

>> well, let me just tell you about vermont. we were the very first state in this country to pass civil unions. we have led the nation. we have led the nation. >> right. >> yeah. [applause]. >> so where is governor -- you know, governor malloy stepped out. the mayors of seattle and portland, among other cities, stepped out and said we're not going to fund travel to indiana. >> yeah, and i support that, absolutely. >> so you would call for governor shumlin to do that? >> i think as a nation, yeah. i don't have any problem with that. but i think as a nation we should let the folks in indiana or in arkansas or elsewhere know that we don't support discrimination. >> right. >> you said over the last couple of days, not for the first time, certainly, we have to take on billionaires, there's no ifs, ands, or buts about that. >> yes. >> you alluded earlier to the idea that they should pay their fair share. is there anything else that you would like to see, as a matter of federal policy, with regard to redistribution of wealth or what wo

if you're gonna let me down let me down gently d d't pretend that you don't want me our love ain't water under the bridge oh say that our love ain't water under the bridge what are you waiting for you never seem to make it through the door and who are you hiding from it ain't you're on the run have i ever asked for much the only thing that i want is your love if you're gonna let me down let me down gently don't pretend that you don't want me our love ain't water under the bridge if you're gonna let me down let me down gently don't pretend that you don't want me our r ve ain't water under the bridge oh say that our love ain't water under the bridge it's so cold in in in in yr wilderness i want you to be my reckless ooh if you're gonna let me down let me down gently don't pretend that you don't want me our love ain't water under the bridge if you're gonnanaet me down let me down gently don't pretend that you don't want me our love ain't water under the bridge oh oh say it ain't so say it ain't so say it ain't so say it a a't so say that our love ain't water under the bridge oh say it ain't

let me show you this. according to simmons research, here are the top ten places where conservatives shop. most stores are located in the south. here are the stores where liberals shop, mostly in urban areas. you'll notice not one store in the conservative list appears on the liberal list, nor one store on the liberal list appearing on the conservative list. a lot of this is geography but it shows you how we have totally sorted ourselves out. >>> we'll be back in a moment with the speaker of the house paul ryan on what he thinks he and the president can actually get done. (donkey noise) (elephant noise) (mic screech) there's a big difference between making noise... (mic tap) ...and making sense. (elephant noise) (donkey noise) when it comes to social security, we need more than lip service. our next president needs a real plan to keep social security strong. (elephant noise) hey candidates! enough talk. give us a plan. his day of coaching begins with knee pain, when... this is brad. hey brad, wanna trade t

let me just ask you -- >> let me respond -- >> we did -- secretary clinton, let me just ask you -- >> let me respond very quickly. number one -- >> and in particular -- >> number one, there are currently two hedge fund billionaires running ads against me here in new hampshire. they started in iowa. now, you'd have to ask yourself me? and the answer is because they know i will go right after them, that i will not let their agenda be america's agenda. secondly, i think it's important to point out that about 3% of my donations come from people in the finance and investment world. you can go to opensecrets.org and check that. i have more donations from students and teachers than i do from people associated with wall street. [ applause ] now, number three, and let me say this. heading the democratic governors association, he had no trouble at all going to wall street to raise money to run campaigns for democratic governors. and he also had no trouble appointing an investment banker to be in charge of his consumer protection bureau when he was governor. so you know, again, the difference be

speaker, let me be clear. people will not return to syria if part of it is under the control of an organization that people, throws gay people off buildings, beheads aid workers, and forces children to marry before they are even 10 years old. so we cannot separate the humanitarian work and the reconstruction work from dealing with daesch itself. >> i think the prime minister for giving way. welcome his views about terminology. i asked the prime minister a question as a new memory of this house. given that the language being used would be considered , and for the benefit of new members, with the prime minister withdraw his remarks? david cameron: i think everyone is now focused on the main issues in front of us. the plan for to pro -- for post-conflict reconstruction. oneid we should commit to billion pounds for reconstruction. it would be for security, stabilization, and confidence building measures, including basic you military and needs, and helping the refugees to return. over time, the focus would shift to

let me get that quickly. let me follow up with my other question, which is, when the prime minister was here, there was certainly an impression given, pakistan, that he was attempting to continue to build on democratic principles, focus on economic development, education, issues that we would be concerned about. and certainly existence, if you will, with india. so i'm wondering what your assessment is. if you would start with the status of the doctor, and then lastly, if you could give me just a little bit about afghanistan. i'm concerned in terms of whether or not the frontier land or the areas are even embraced by the central government, whether or not we actually have a functioning, tranquil, growing government in afghanistan. >> thank you, congresswoman. with regard to dr. afridi, we do believe there is no reason for his continued detention. we've been assured by the pakistanis that he is in good health. but we continue to press his case, absolutely, at the highest levels of our government and seek his re

let me go on. look, between what the director said even yesterday-- look, if you talk to the folks in our national security community, the islamic state is using social media as a main recruiting tool. this is their game. this is their world. they are doing this all the globe and yet if we look at what homeland security is doing, we don't have a regular widespread requirement that our people review the social media of people coming from trouble areas where you have a lot of terrorists, places like pakistan, afghanistan, syria, iraq, tunisia, parts of north africa where you have got a lot of support for radical jihad, violent jihad and we are not reviewing the social media even though that is the world in which they operate and we don't regularly review that and that's major problem. so, look, i think if someone is applying for citizenship to the united states, is entirely reasonable that we ask for their social media contacts, their information. these people don't radicalize overnight. a lot of the

>> let me make two quick points. first of all the jpmorgan example i can choose not to use jpmorgan and i can sue them if they distribute my data in a personal way. target took a big hit. you don't see any of this with the federal government but lastly we don't have to wonder how this works. the example weather is not personally identifiable information that you can leak it to the courthouse identities. not that hard. >> the chair recognizes mr. cleaver for five minutes. >> thank you very much mr. chairman. i thank all of you for being here. appreciate it very much. mr. speaker you may have misspoken and say that the cfpb was totally secret so i'm assuming -- this is not a catcher wrong question but when you made the comment i didn't think you were saying that the cfpb was the agency. >> my impression is if you look at various hearings and various interrogatories that the leader of the cfpb has remarkably little interest in sharing with congress and whole range of information including the cost overruns including sal

let me -- let me just explain. we knew of four or more individuals who our security people had been watching. the couple in san bernardino, it appears, were communicating with those people. but yet because of strong encryption, we didn't detect it. let me also say in the case of san bernardino, there were some red flags. people building an arsenal. neighbors who might have suspected something. we need to watch. we need to report. but encryption technology when people can hide in a playstation 4 or when they can use the encryption on our own phones to avoid detection has to be solved. but it isn't easy. because the minute you begin to solve the encryption problem by giving our security officials an ability to get in a back door, it opens the possibility for criminals to be able to use that same back door or those who want to harm us to use that same back door to exploit access to the n encrypted technology. so, what do you do? you sit down with people in the technology community, in the intelligence community, in th

let me go back to that point. in the book as you read it, this was the first note that i took concerning that. you have nancy this individual who is running the show. it's like he is the puppet and she is the puppeteer. at one point saying nancy has more influence over him than his aid. >> guest: no doubt about that. she had the last word. >> host: this is where the clarification needs to take place here. she had the last word on his personal life in and his social life. she never interfered in hollywood. >> guest: you know what, i think you are correct on that. nancy was in lockstep with ronald reagan on policy. we didn't find any disagreements that they had politically, so reagan was anti-communist and nancy was anti-communist. reagan was procapitalist pro-private marketplace, smaller government and so was nancy so we didn't see any tension there. but nancy reagan did after the assassination attempt was she took off all the stuff she felt ronald reagan and her husband shouldn't have to deal with and that was a l

but let me start with the benefits of a safe zone. the benefit for a safe zone would be a place where people who wished to move there could move there and be protected. now, one has to be careful but who might wish to move there, because people might want to live where they live, and also we wouldn't want to create a situation in which people were expelled from countries to which they had moved into a safe zone by countries that didn't want them. that's an undesirable outcome. from a military point of view, and i'll let general dunford elaborate on this, one would need to anticipate that such a zone in syria would be contested. it would certainly be contested by isil, who would want to prove that it wasn't safe. possibly elements of the regime who would want to prove it's not safe if it's on syrian territory. so it ends up being a substantial military operation. the turks, we have discussed things like that with the turks. they have not offered a force of the size that would do that. so let me stop there and ask general dunford to ela

so let me ask you this. if the s.e.c. wants a box of documents sitting in a target's home, can you use an a administrative subpoena to bring a locksmith to their home to open the door, walk in and take documents? >> we cannot. >> so then please explain to us why you think we should give you the ability to do exactly that with the digital equivalent, how that could possibly come port with expectations of privacy and due process. and without a shred of meaningful evidence from you so far or anyone else that this -- that the lack of this authority will have any impact on your ability to carry out investigations whatsoever. >> we view the isp as a third party storage provider like an iron mountain provider would be for hard copy documents that are kept in a storage facility and if in the circumstance where hard copy are kept in a storage facility we could go to that storage facility with notice to the person who uses that storage facility and try to obtain the documents by a subpoena and that, i think, is the analogy that we

let me ask, why not? why not just arrest anybody who is misusing drugs and put them where they belong and call it a day? isn't that a more effective more effective strategy. >> no, unfortunately that is not the case. >> .. and so law enforcement across the land has had a paradigm shift and understand for that very reason it is a clichÉ now. can't arrest our way out of the problem, nor do they want to. addiction is a disease and needs to be treated however those that capitalizing benefit of the ones we are after. >> final question, you talked about budget reductions. can you expand on that and what the impact has been? >> the program has historically been very valuable and using the funding appropriated. we have in the past provided a very substantial return on investment. to reduce the program would put us back many years in the progress we have made. the language in the authorization -- >> have we reduced the program? >> no comeau we have not. >> you talked about a budget reduction. >> while he is check

and let me answer. the average stay in hospital has actually fallen from five and a half days to five days. and one of the reasons for that is that we kept our promises on the nhs. we put an extra 12 million in the last parliament and we'll be putting 19 billion pounds in this parliament. >> just for the record, i did say happy christmas. maybe the prime minister waechbts listening at the time. if he's so happy, mr. speaker, about the national health service, could he explain, then, why he's decided to cancel the publication of nhs performance data this wednesday? and there was a time when the prime minister was all in favor of transparency, and it's not that long ago. in fact, it was 2011 when he said, and i quote, information is power. it lets people hold the powerful to account, give being them the tools they need to take on politicians and bureaucrats. is it because the number of people have been kept waiting on trolleys in a&e has gone up more than fourfold, that he doesn't want to publish these st

you didn't let me-- you didn't let me finish. you didn't let me finish. winfrey. ( cheers and applause ) i just want to make sure you're applauding for the right oprah. there are a lot of oprahs out there. then, i'll be talking to joseph fink and jeffery cranor, the creators of the hit podcast "welcome to night vale." ( cheers and applause ) >> stephen: this is a hip, hip crowd. that's is a hip crowd. the podcast takes place in a mysterious place where monsters are real and every crazy story is true. so, florida. ( laughter ) and, we'll have a musical performance from judith hill. she's got-- ( applause ) she got her big break on "the voice," and she is so great that, when she sings, i might even turn my chair to face her. oh. you hear that? that is either the world's sexiest smoke alarm, or, that is jon batiste and stay human. say hi, everybody. before they play tonight's theme, one more thing-- jeb bush's presidential campaign raised $13 million in the third quarter. meanwhile, lincoln chafee's campaign has raised its third quarter. ( laughter ) >> toni

let me give you another example. let us assume for the moment that i am inarticulate, i cannot -- stop laughing that's my son making faces back there. let's assume that i'm inarticulate, i can't get up before crowds, i don't really like crowds but i have very strong opinions. mark here however, is running for office and it turns out every one of the ideas i hold mark supports. now, i want to help him. anything wrong with that? if i give mark a lot of money, that's my speech. i am using my money to essentially get my ideas out. first amendment protects that. now the question you raise and one which i do not have a good answer for is when we get into these mega- quantities. and what to do about that. but, in terms of -- the book i wrote was money and speech. in politics it's the same thing, without without money there is no speech. >> just a quick question, you mentioned the current court is what did you say? a nasty court, can you elaborate on that and what effect that could have? >> up until fairly recently the court

let me close with this point. one thing that inspires me about israel is that in the face of so much adversity there is no nation that wants peace more. no nation with greater restraint toward enemies. and even as the current administration has turned her back in recent years, no people have stood by our nation on issue after issue more than the people of israel. i encourage you to go back and look at the united nations roll call votes time and again in the interests of america are challenged israel is one of the few countries the votes with the united states over and over and over again. likelike our own country the state of israel is an extraordinary story in the history of the world. i believe our nation's sure moral foundation and the common moral destiny. let us stand with them, as they have stood with us. let our nation service beacons of light and ever darkening world. thank you for having me today. [applause] >> thank you. thank you very much. >> we have nine minutes. we have about nine minutes for some qu

this really upsets me. >> let me ask pam this question. you're talking about 15 pipe bombs, 15 rounds of ammunition, and equipment to make eids. you have the pakistani passport. the father saying he's a devout muslim and the report that he had been radicalized, what is an intelligent person supposed to conclude? >> everything points to terrorism. of course it points to terrorism. the investigation has to conclude, but everything we're hearing and seeing now, that is what it's demonstrating. you know, sean, guns, they're politicizing it and shame on them for criticizing us for wanting to pray for the victim. they put us -- >> in florida because of your support for the second amendment. >> i get attacked all the time. i believe in the second amendment. >> last word? >> you have got this valerie jared running this country in the oval office. i want to tell you. that one, too. >> valerie -- >> i don't care what her name is. >> we have to get the fbi director to say this was an act of terrorism. >> all right. thank you both for being with us. p

me finish. >> you jerk. >> let me finish. let me finish. >> let me tell you where you're right and where you're wrong. >> do i get to actually speak now? >> larry: and it really doesn't matter what they're arguing. they just get paid to argue. so here at "the nightly show," we're jumping onboard the mindless argument bandwagon in a segment we call "pardon the integration." yeah. all right! yeah! ( cheers and applause ) please welcome our debaters, "nightly show" contributors. mike yard and rory albanese. okay. boys, you know the rules. you're both going to argue one side of an issue, and when the bell rings, you switch sides, proving that if you're having an argument on cable television, whatever side you're on is completely irrelevant. we ready to do this? now, rory, you're jewish. and, mike, obviously, you're black. ( laughter ) so let's start with a nice seasonal racial question: hannukah or kwanzaa, which is better? >> rory: as a jew, i'll admit hanukkah is kind of lame compared to christmas. if christmas is disney world,

let me make some progress. let me turn to the question whether there will be ground forces a success. those who say there aren't as many ground troops that we would like, they are correct. we are not dealing with an ideal situation. let me make important points. first, we should be clear what air strikes can do. we don't need ground troops to hit isis health health headquar. it's clear air strikes can have an effect with the issue of khan and hussein. it can do serious damage to daesh and we should give them that support. >> i think the -- i thank the prime minister. how would the prime minister respond to the point that daesh since offensive against baghdad has actually changed tactics, dispersed courses and particularly raqaa600000 people all through that city into small units which make it attacks from tornadoes given the small number of tornadoes we have. >> that's not an argument for not doing something. it's an argument for using air strikes where you can but having a longer-term strategy to deliver groun

let me talk specifically about pakistan. pakistan is the top -- part of the top three countries, iraq, afghanistan, and pakistan where there have been the most terrorist attacks, the highest number of casualties and sort f of -- that pakistan is on the front line of this fight and this sense of lack of security. so, i told you i'm going to be a little discombobulated but -- okay. okay. so, just quickly deaths by victims categories. there are, of course, vast majority of them are civilian. this is just 2011. and it's actually number not just for pakistan but for the world. but it sort of mirrors what was going on in pakistan, too. the one important point that i would want to make out of that, this graph, is that if you look at it, of course, civilians are the highest number of casualties. there are also significant number that are children. but if you look at in terms of people who are fighting against the terrorists, law enforcement, there you see that, yes, there are military and security forces that have been killed in thi

let me ask you a question. all right, let's see there was a monster under your bed or in your closet and you were scared of the monster and people came in, very helpful people, first responders to the monster situation, and they helped get rid of the monster, clean up after the monster for months but because they got monster juice on them, got sick. would you help those people? >> yes. no. hold on one second. no? you would be a good congress person. would you guys take care of the people? >> yes. it seems obvious. so what i would say is this is our senator mcconnell -- you be senator mcconnell in this -- and you would be, uh, normal human people. you know what? thank you you guys for listening. what time is snack? soon? we caught up with senator portman on his way from voting to make sure people on the terrorist watch list could still buy guns. >> we'll let them know i support it. the question is how to pay for it. >> you know you can find money when you want. so that pay for it stuff really doesn't reach -- it

let me talk. no. but now he is just now saying it . now. >> i was taking it in, like, for a bike with no lights. >> ifjust, like -- nolan that is what you wanted, why did you need to search him or do anything else? >> a 15-year-old. for one 15-year-old. one. why are you going to lock calvin up? the one in the black shirt, what did you do? you know that he said this is because of my 15-year-old nephew did not have lights on his bike. a light on his bike. are you serious? a light on his bike. a light on his bike. a light on his bike. ♪ [applause] talk about what we just saw. let me introduce you we have on stage. you will recognize some of them. kelly amos. amos is the founder. carla -- carla harris is here. i imagine this is difficult to watch this over and over again. i was backstage with you and i watched your shoulders. >> i had to stop the tears. so emotional every time you see the film. >> when you look back and you think about what could have happened, is there anything you're in -- what is the one thing that might have stopped

let me just mention a couple of things isi. on isi. first of all we do have a very robust engagement with isi. i met with the isi chief regularly during my tenure in pakistan, and made the points that i described earlier about terrorism directly to him. isi does have a role to play with regard to afghan reconciliation, and we think it's a role that pakistan with large plate and bring the taliban to the table last summer was quite important and they need to do that again in our view public upon the positive statements out of the heart of asia conference. >> thank you very much. thank you for answering my question. yield back. >> ms. gabbard of hawaii. >> thank you, madam chair. just follow up on my colleague mr. cook's questions, you know, the concern here is your talk about robust engagement with isi, but there has been evidence time and time again of their direct and indirect connections with the haqqani network. in 2011 then chairman of the joint chiefs of staff admiral mike mullen called the haqqani network a variable are of the hig

let me get that quickly. let me follow up with my other question, which is, when the prime minister was here, there was certainly an impression given, pakistan, that he was attempting to continue to build on democratic principles, focus on economic development, education, issues that we would be concerned about. and certainly existence, if you will, with india. so i'm wondering what your assessment is. if you would start with the status of the doctor, and then lastly, if you could give me just a little bit about afghanistan. i'm concerned in terms of whether or not the frontier land or the areas are even embraced by the central government, whether or not we actually have a functioning, tranquil, growing government in afghanistan. >> thank you, congresswoman. with regard to dr. afridi, we do believe there is no reason for his continued detention. we've been assured by the pakistanis that he is in good health. but we continue to press his case, absolutely, at the highest levels of our government and seek his re

let me see your hands l.a.! down with the shame down with the shame carried the flag in some other men's name loaded my weapon and swore to them vengeance and stepped with aggression right into the fray into the haze into the murk told me to prove to them what i was worth we'll teach you to move without mercy and give you the tools to go after the causers of hurt you'll become death you will take breath this is for everything you've ever loved use all the pain that you've felt in your life as the currency go out and trade it for blood you are not you you are now us we are the only ones that you can trust you'll become fear they'll become dust before this moment you are the smoldering vessel of punishment born to do nothing but justify us give us your empathy we'll give you lust time to grow up give up your childish obsession with questioning anything we don't tell you is irrelevant everything you've ever been and fire of the weapon you clutch can't pick up no crown holding what's holding you down can't pick up n

let me quote from his report. multiple defish deficiencies exn h.u.d.'s internal controls over financial reporting, resulting in misstatements on financial statements. noncompliance laws and regulations. we have reported on h.u.d.'s administrative control of funds in our audit reports and management letters since fiscal year 2005. h.u.d. continued to not have a fully implemented and complete administrative control of funds system that provided oversight of both obligations and disbursements. in 2005, this was exposed. ten years later, they're still having the same problem. they still haven't cleaned up their act. and this is just one agency. maybe this is the worst agency. i don't know, in terms of financial records and being responsible to the people in terms of how they spend money, but i doubt it. i would suspect that this statement could have been made by a number of our agencies. let me highlight a couple of specific examples from the inspector general's audits. one audit examined h.u.d.'s government national mortgage administration commonly known a

let me move on to a second issue that has me concerned. and let me get your response to it. throughout the iran review of the agreement itself, the estimate from all of the administration witnesses was that iran would most likely be eligible for sanction relief in the spring. that was the date give n. in many of the specific estimates, they said they had so much to do that it would take at least until the spring. now we understand it is likely that iran will be in compliance and entitled to sanction relief as early as january. so i guess my point is -- obviously, we want them to comply as quickly as possible. don't get me wrong. but are we underestimating iran's participation in this agreement that could affect other aspects here as well? and why do we misjudge so badly the date which was likely for compliance? >> senator, i think the agreement is very clear that implementation date comes and the sanctions relief comes only when iran has completed every single step that it must do in terms of reducing the capacity of its nuclear program for weaponization. >> i don't mean to

alahi, let me educate you because clearly you didn't see what happened. let me finish. our chairman of homeland security committee today said that isis has plans to infiltrate the refugee community. we saw what happened in paris where isis infiltrated the refugee community. explain to every american why we should gamble with their lives if we can't ascertain if a person is a true or honest refugee or if they've aligned themselves with a terror group. >> i'm saying that we are wasting our time dealing with the effects and not the causes. if you are really serious about that, you have to deal with the saudi government and those who are supporting the terrorism and supporting al qaeda and supporting isis. >> why should we -- one specific question. why should america take in syrian refugees when the head of homeland security is warning us as is our national director of intelligence and the fbi director they're warning that isis will infiltrate and we cannot vet them? answer that question. >> the syrians do not want to come to this country. but not the way the president was

let me guess -- graduation present? yeah. i got a few of those. uh-huh. [ laughs ] don't people know y'all only use computers these days? [ chuckles ] speaking of which... thanks. if you could just, uh, boot it up for us so we can list it as yours and wrap this thing up. yeah. susu. okay. [ keys clacking ] all good, then? it's yours? yeah. great. you know, it's fny. while i was investigating ashley's murder, i found a series of other burglaries in your neighborhood. really? in fact, i was just visiting with a mr. wein. name ring a bell? his son, dennis, was a senior in high school with you. their house was burglarized when they were on family vacation, just like yours. you see, we spoke to a mr. simmons and a mrs. preston, and they alsohad burglaries at occurred whwhe they were out of town. and would you believe they also have kids who just graduated from your high school. i don't really recognize those names, so, um... really? hmm. that's odd. their parents knew you really well. said you and their kids were thick as thieves. so, tell me, jesse, i

let me ask, why not? why not just arrest anybody who is misusing drugs and put them where they belong and call it a day? isn't that a more effective more effective strategy. >> no, unfortunately that is not the case. >> .. and so law enforcement across the land has had a paradigm shift and understand for that very reason it is a clichÉ now. can't arrest our way out of the problem, nor do they want to. addiction is a disease and needs to be treated however those that capitalizing benefit of the ones we are after. >> final question, you talked about budget reductions. can you expand on that and what the impact has been? >> the program has historically been very valuable and using the funding appropriated. we have in the past provided a very substantial return on investment. to reduce the program would put us back many years in the progress we have made. the language in the authorization -- >> have we reduced the program? >> no comeau we have not. >> you talked about a budget reduction. >> while he is check