bill: no. emily: how do you balance whether something is impossible? but maybe possible? bill: you can't lose money, need to be correct, i need to be right, then that is the wrong business for you. emily: is that the luxury of working at google? bill: no. if we all lose money, we will not have a job anymore to it we go in optimistic there is a cure for cancer, but skeptical of every approach. that is just science. we have bioengineers and physicians on the team who spend their careers on this kind of thing. we're ok being wrong sometimes or even most of the time. , emily: google gives you as much money as you want. bill: they don't give me -- i would not put it in those terms . we all try to be rational. how much money can we reasonably invest and expect a good return. emily: you do not have to fund raise. it is kind of the luxury. they'll: it's is probably one third of our time, which will be spent raising money, with companies and other things, which is a great benefit for us. emily: you once

you have to get back on your kayak, bill. bill: right on. disturbing reports that more christians have been slaughtered by isis. orthodox church leader says more than 20 were murdered in a small town near palmyra, syria. that town was captured by syrian army a week ago after eight month under the control of isis. california congressman ed royce, the chair of the house foreign affairs committee. just returned from meetings overseas. welcome back to "america's newsroom." welcome home. you were in iraq, syria and tunisia. what do we need to understand about the isis in the form we have today? >> we met with christian refugees and you spoke about and heard stories about their atrocities and yazidis and kurdish forces. what i point i would make, kurdish and yazidi forces are not getting support they need from the united states with the weaponry, they're fighting with 40-year-old weapons. they need anti-tank weapons to stop these suicide vehicles. we saw one of the suicide vehicles that had been captured. it is encased in iron by isis with a cow c

the clerk will report the title of the bill. the clerk: a bill to require the secretary of homeland security to use the testimonials of former or estranged violent extremists or their associates in order to counter terrorist recruitment and for other purposes. the speaker pro tempore: the question is will the house sprowls and -- suspend the rules and pass the bill as amended? members will record their votes by electronic device. this is a 15-minute vote. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 322, the nays are 79. 2/3 of those voting having responded in the affirmative, the rules are suspended, the bill is passed and without objection the motion to reconsider is laid upon the table. without objection, the title is amended

clinton's bill. he signed it into law. >> angela, so listen. i agree with you. and i know about those organizations. and i have worked in local news and they don't get coverage. but what black lives matter has figured out is that they get the attention because they go where the cameras are. they go to the presidential rallies and other people are not doing that. but is it time for people to do that as well to draw some attention to that? >> don, we can critique the strategy of black activists. i want to crit seek the strategist of the clintons who want to go back into the white house. the base vote of this party is the black vote. we give not 50%, not 60%, not 70%, not 80%. 92% of our vote to this party. i've never seen a republican go on tv and insult their base voters. their base voters are white evangelicals. they would never, ever have a republican candidate front-runner, spouse, stand up and disrespect white evangelicals at anything. and yet bill clinton feels like he is free to stand up there a

so i would urge my colleagues to vote against this bill and against all bills that seek to roll back our progress in making the financial system safer. with that, mr. speaker, i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back. the gentlelady from california reserves. the gentleman from texas is recognized. mr. hensarling: may i inquire how much time remains on each side? the speaker pro tempore: 14 1/2 minutes for the gentleman from texas. and 15 for the gentlelady from california. mr. hensarling: at this time, mr. speaker, i'm pleased to yield two minutes to the gentleman from new york, mr. king. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from new york is recognized for two minutes. mr. king: i thank the chairman for yielding. mr. speaker, i rise today in strong support of h.r. 3340, the financial stability oversight council reform act. mr. speaker, i do not support the creation of fsoc and o.f.r. and do not think the 10 un-elected agency head should be able to have such influence over the u.s. financial system. t h.r. 3340 doesn't even curtail fsoc's or o.f.r.'s powers,

bill. i thank you and i reserve the alance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman reserves the balance of her time. the gentleman from texas is recognized. mr. hensarling: i'm very happy to yield one minute to the gentleman from california, mr. mccarthy. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from california is recognized for one minute. mr. mccarthy: i want to thank the gentleman for yielding. before i move on, i want to thank him for his work on financial services. this is another bill coming to the floor with a large bipartisan vote, coming out. and creating jobs. that's what this floor is all about. so today we're talking about an american economy that is ripe for innovation. this is what is needed to create jobs and opportunity. my colleagues, i ask them, how many times have you traveled back to your district and sat down and saw an individual that craves to be an entrepreneur, it could be that single mom, could be that person that stuck in a job, or a young kid with grea

h.r. 4820 is nothing more than than a message bill a bill that says the message -- sends a message to d.h.s. to focus its countermessaging effortson the foreign terrorist groups. domestic terror groups, like foreign terror group organizations, recruit and spread propaganda through social media and online platforms. this bill ignores the fact that the mess -- that domestic terror groups, like foreign terrorist organizations, kill americans. since september 11, terrorists espousing the ideology of foreign terrorist organizations are responsible for killing 45 innocent americans on u.s. soil. during the same period, members of the -- members of domestic terrorist organizations murdered more than 48 americans. if you ask law enforcement leaders across this country what keeps them up at night, they will likely say the prospect that there's a sovereign citizen group or militia plotting in their jurisdiction. just last month, the atlanta police chief testified before my committee that he is deeply concerned about homegrown extremists and militia activity. his testimony echoed the results of

this bill -- economicess p.j.age. -- espionage. this bill will help our economic security. our intellectual property laws includes everything from patenters, copyrights and trademarks and trade secrets but what are trade secrets? trade secret law is used to protect some of the most iconic inventions in america. for example, a trade secret can recipes like colonel sanders secret recipe of 11 herbs and spices and coca-cola housed in the vault of world of coca-cola in atlanta, georgia. however, trade secrets are simply not isolated to the realm of food and beverages. they can include confidential formulas like the formula for wd-40, manufacturing techniques, customer lists and algorithms like google's search engine. trade secrets occupy a unique place in the i.p. portfolios of our most innovative companies. but because they are unregistered and not formally reviewed like patents, they are no limitations on discovering a trade secret by fair, lawful methods, such as reverse engineering or independent development. in innovative industries, that is simply the free market at work.

i believe this is a good bill, a fair bill. it does contain trade-offs and hard choices, and we have worked together to settle differences. obviously the chair is the chair, and the views come number one. but in the case of this chair, he has been eminently fair, and i'm very grateful for that. as he said, our allocation is $37.5 billion. that's a $350 million increase over fy 2016. given the top-line budget constraints, this is a good allocation. let me first talk about the defense portion of the bill. defense spending in this bill is $20 billion, a $450 million increase over fy 2016. our defense spending includes funding for cleaning up the environmental legacy of the cold war, maintaining our nuclear deterrent, supporting our nuclear navy, and partnering with allies to keep nuclear materials out of the hands of terrorists. funding for our nuclear deterrent this year is $9.3 billion, $438 million above last year and equal to the president's budget request. the science and engineering activities needed to maintain the nuclear

the burger king bill of rights. the pet bill of rights. the hospital bill of rights. everybody puts the lettering in the sweetly way. the paper is yellow. there is this cultural way in which this moment and the bill of rights coming out of it is part of our american cultural legacy. ken: the iconic status of the bill of rights is something that came out of the -- deal and assess quintin sesquicentennial celebration. december 15, 1941 one week after pearl harbor. japan and line about not much about the bill of rights acceptance. an example of what nazi germany isn't. >> thank you for joining us. thank you for your questions. thank you for your time. help me thank this amazing panel. if you want to talk about the constitution, you don't do much better than this. [applause]

what would that bill do? >> that bill would prevent the i.r.s. from hiring new employees until the treasury department either certifies that no current i.r.s. employees have seriously delinquent tax debt or the treasury department issues a report explaining why it couldn't make that certification. >> and where are the democrats coming down on that one? >> well, democrats have said that i.r.s. employees actually have a lower rate of tax delinquency than house of representatives employees. during the ways and means markup, congressman earl blumenauer, a democrat of oregon, introduced an amendment that would have prevented congress from hiring new employees unless there was a certification that no employees of congress had any tax debt. but kevin brady, the chairman of the ways and means committee, ruled that that amendment was not germane. >> the obama administration coming out opposing both of today's measures. what is the white house saying about them, why are they opposed? >> so the white house is opposed to both of these bills, but it has expli

bill: lidia and hank. spare change? >> it depends on what kind of change you are looking for. everybody. >> making money, baby. >> the guys and i got out to undaunted on the bed. just to see what we had. >> did you just give the camera the finger? [laughter] anything. they bring the curiosity plan that is where it all starts. >> look on the front of it. really shiny. on the top? >> so later on he dumped out his job. >> are you telling? >> only partially stamped. >> those are worth a ton. >> i don't know where it is. >> anyway, she found it. the idlewild park dated 1909. they seem to be pretty special. time to call the expert. he runs colonial valley and he says there are three things essentially that make it quite valuable to my condition, rarity, and demand. >> just because they are new does not mean they are worthless. like this particular coin. >> because it is a freak. it should have been edited out. >> the most valuable of the bunch. >> we are trying to determine the value. in the neighborhood of $30. bill: no kidd

smith's bill. i would like to yield five minutes to the distinguished chair of the rules committee, the gentleman from texas, pete sessions. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from texas is recognized for five minutes. mr. sessions: thank you very much, mr. speaker. i appreciate the gentleman, the member of the rules committee, mr. stivers, for not old yielding me the time but also the service that he give -- only yields me the time but also the service he gives to the rules committee, the hours of deliberate work and reading and thought process. i also want to address if i can, as the gentleman, mr. stivingers did, with great admiration -- stivers did, with great admiration, not only to judge hastings for his always constant staying with issues and ideas that not only affect his district in florida, but really address the entire country. and i was delighted yesterday when the gentleman brought up, in a most thoughtful, genuine way, where is the answer to these important questions? what we're h

bill: how come? >> because the standard operating proceed your if you're a criminal defense lawyer is never, ever, ever let your client talk to the people that are investigating your client. that's the mistake martha stewart's lawyers made. she told one lie to one fbi agent in one conversation, she went to prison. but mrs. clinton has said many times i can't wait to talk to the fbi. so if they invite her in and she does not go in, the prudent legal advice, she will be placing herself in political jeopardy because then we know i can't wait to talk to the fbi was another one of her lies. and the image will be what is she hiding that she doesn't want to talk to the fbi? she can't win this. bill: if she is not charged, the government put out a report? do they release findings to tell the public why they did this or did -- >> that is a great question. not officially, but i think in her case unofficially. meaning members of the justice department community who believe she should be indicted will probably l

our bill, the energy and water bill will be 37.5 billion. however, the entire federal as budget is a lot more than 1,000,000,000,000 dollars. in fact, in fact, it is four times as much. so we're the entire federal budget this year is $3.9 billion. so we are talking abouts appropriated dollars of about 1,000,000,000,000 dollars plus about 3,000,000,000,000 other dollars that will spend this year through the federal government. those dollars are iose dollars are what we call mandatory or automatic spendingt plus interest on the debt. federal health care spending is an example, that is about $1 trillion. about the same amount of all the 12 appropriation bills that will be considering. the senate for medicare and s medicaid services is in charge of spending about 88 6,000,000,000 dollars dollars every year. almost all mandatory spending. s so the part of the budget that weird talking about today and we will be talking about for the next 12 weeks is one fourth of the total federal spending. for i want to thank senator and the majority leader for

bill: who is to blame? >> despite what many would have you believe there are latino immigrants who are for trump. >> wire we not supporting the democrats? it's like asking jenkins why are you voting for colonel sanders. >> angelo. >> angelo. >> when i call today, i asked him how he was doing. not so good. >> work with me. >> a truck driver making a delivery right here in the bronx. stole the public from inside of the truck on thursday. >> i was doing unloading in the back. >> now, veto is a diabetic. started licking him at certain times when the sugars are feeling high. he has his blood sugar testing machine. not just a dog, a little life-saving therapy dog. >> learn with me: my sugar level goes up. >> that's crazy. >> so he learned to see when my sugar is going high. >> of been out here all day to find a 14 -month-old chilean. chasing his tail. but been out here every day since thursday. a lot more important than just a dog to him. >> my buddy. all day. don't even know if he can respond to you. he's a ther

the burger king bill of rights. the pet bill of rights. the hospital bill of rights. everybody puts the lettering in the squiggly way. the paper is yellow. there is this cultural way in which this moment and the bill of rights coming out of it is such an important part of our american cultural legacy. ken: the iconic status of the bill of rights is something that came out of the new deal and the sesquicentennial commission. and it was a direct response to the rise of nazi germany. if you read fdr's statement on the 200th anniversary of the ratification of the bill of rights. december 15, 1941, one week after pearl harbor. mostly about germany. he has one line about japan and not much about the bill of rights itself. except as an example of what nazi germany isn't. >> thank you for joining us. thank you for your questions. thank you for your time. help me thank this amazing panel. if you want to talk about the constitution, you can't do much better than this. [applause] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2016] [captioning performed by the national capti

described in the bill. if they would become law, of course the nrc would abide by those -- >> fewer resources are not good for the agency in protecting against a potential terrorist attack. is that true? >> and, quite frankly, senator, we are in a declining budgetary environment and we are doing our due diligence to assure that our resources are appropriately allocated. >> no, i appreciate that. now you're pulling it away from other nuclear safety issues in order to deal with the terrorist attack when both are very real in our country. so i just think that we have to be realistic, that the belgian warning, that they were looking at a nuclear power plant, that they were trying to attack it, is clearly something we have to take into account here in the united states. and when we're talking about the nuclear regulatory commission's budget, yeah, we might want to do a favor for utilities and reduce their fees, but where is the money going to come from then in order to produce the level of safety which we're goi

george bush, bill clinton, ross perot. americans go to the polls and select a president today, election day, november 3rd, 1992. >> oh, boy, nervous. as anyone would be in that situation. everyone was. >> well, there are a number of very, very close races in the south. indeed we expect a great deal of drama in this region throughout the evening. >> i was scared. thinking the difference in my life between us winning and losing. >> most of the polls are now closed in north dakotand in the senate race there. >> we were in houston which is where president bush liked to celebrate election nights. >> let's take a look at the national numbers now. >> we got morning waves and they had us way down, like 15 points down. >> the electromap is looking lopsided in favor of bill clinton. >> the afternoon wave wasn't much better, had us like 12 points dow. >> the democratic nominee swept the east including the electoral prizes of new york and pennsylvania. >> that brings this electoral vote total to 265. that's but five away from the magi

so we will get a new looking five dollar bill, $10 bill, $20 bill, so harriet tubman will go on the face of the $20 bill. that will be the first african-american ever on the face of u.s. currency. >> was it really the musical? >> i think it was. there are not a lot of hamilton everyday life,in and settling the musical has a lot of attention and people were mobilized to defend him. and people also want to put the face of a woman on a bill. and the compromise is, you put a new back on some of the bills, and now we will have a new look. >> why did andrew jackson turn out to be the loser? anytime you make changes, somebody will be unhappy. who got left out? >> some policy -- some tennessee politicians do not like the idea. the $20 bill will look a lot different. but ultimately, this is a popularity contest. this is about the nation and how it wants to be viewed in the future. martha: it will take a long time for this to happen. in the meantime, there will be a new president. not saying that he will be a new president melissa and to what donald trump -- president, listen to what donald trump

bill. can you explain? guest: yes. one of the things that senator thune did to make the bill acceptable to both sides and to get it through the senate was to keep proposals to privatize air traffic control out of the senate bill. senator shuster is determined to get a bill that does craft privatized air traffic control. that is spin it off into a private nonprofit corporation. and that's very controversial. so if he insists on doing it that way, it may wind up with no bill this year or it will be very hard to get a bill out of the house that's also acceptable to the senate. host: that was my next question. what is the time line? because it did drag longer than expected in the senate. so what could we expect in the house in the coming weeks or maybe the coming months? guest: well, there's a july 15 deadline. i don't think it's a real hurdle but that's when the f.a.a.'s current authorization that's current authority for powers -- to use its powers and programs expires. so congress needs to do something by july 15th. but

was talking about the crime bill, going, no, come on, bill, don't say that. no, she campaigned for that bill, she tried to change minds as far as that bill was concerned. so, yes, you have some responsibility in that, i'm sorry. >> larry: do you think any of this will hurt hillary in the general election? >> no. >> larry: you don't think it's going to have an effect? >> no, i don't. honestly, people can say whatever they want to about bill clinton but you backtrack two years now, the same people talking (bleep) about bill clinton probably will say that's the best president for black people! now people are saying it's the worst. >> larry: you're saying the voters are fickle. >> you don't know the truth because we're living in the present, we don't know what's going on. that's history. do you think they realized what was going on in history we read in books today? >> larry: the road to hell is paved with good intentions. the crime bill may have had good intentions. >> i'm not that forgiving. they probably had a different intention on bill. they probably dressed

bill: it's going well. the thing that attracted me in the first place is the great history, really exciting markets, clients it know the bank well and like the bank a lot. i came knowing the plenty of problems as well. i knew there were problems unexpected the environment would be challenging. here we are a year after i it's everything i expected. we've got a great franchise with a ton of opportunity. we have a ton of problems as well and i try to be transparent about it. in august, when i made my first book statements about the bank, we had a robust program of actions. we are doing it. the profitability is poor. the earnings are poor. we said we were going to do a bunch of things and we are doing them. the market took it as an encouraging sign. the market understands what our clients know, there is a ton of business for us to do. francine: impairments are better than expected? that i'm not sure what means. our stock has been up and down like a yo-yo. had overextended ourselves in a number of areas. concent

but is that all there is to bill clinton? america still isn't sure. >> people wanted to know more about where he came from. he burst on the scene. he's got like a different way. he's smart, he seems to have a lot of controversy around him. who in the hell is he? where did he come from? why don't i know anything about him? >> i was born in a little town called hope, arkansas three months after my father died. i remember living in that old, two-story house where i lived with my grandparents. i remember going -- >> what are the three things you want people to know? he worked his way up, he was born poor, he's one of you. and that was the start of telling you the story, the central story of the man from hope. >> i end tonight where it all began for me. i still believe in a place called hope. god bless you. and god bless america. >> clinton tells his story and america is buying it. >> he's chosen his running mate, fellow southerner al gore. >> two blonde wives, everybody looks young. perfect day. don't stop thinking about tomorrow

[laughter] bill: 1237? yes or no? >> maybe. bill: me or no. >> under. bill: okay. martha: forget the number 1237, donald trump's campaign reportedly projecting a much bigger number. so what is that number? we'll hear from their campaign coming up. bill: also, more fallout on obamacare. why one insurance company, a big one, is saying no thanks, and why this will be a big deal for the program. we'll tell you about it. you don't let anything keep you sidelined. that's why you drink ensure. with 9 grams of protein and 26 vitamins and minerals. for the strength and energy to get back to doing... ...what you love. ensure. always be you. it's and as fans of awesome tv shows! because we are the couch-dwellers, the binge-watchers, the work-skippers! and we refuse to waste the greatest tv week this proud nation has ever known! but time is scarce my friends, so fetch your fancy voice remotes and join me! three, two, one... watchathon! big is back. xfinity watchathon week now until april 24. the greatest collection of shows free with xfinity on demand. bill: we have just new v

bill of rights. and the g.i. bill actually has such extraordinary value that we should do everything in our power to make sure they get the biggest bang for their buck. now, meanwhile, for-profit colleges have swarmed in and prey on many of our veterans. they cost five to six times more than comparable programs, and their outcomes do not compare. in california alone, over $600 million goes to college assistance for veterans of the iraqi and afghanistan wars. to for-profit colleges. ironically -- or maybe not -- california has imposed accountability standards by governor brown in 2002, and they are not eligible -- many of these for-profits are not eligible for receipt of cal grants because they don't meet these accountability standards around graduation rates and job placement rates. under the current law, it is required that 10% of their total revenues come from nonfederal sources. so 90% can come from federal sources. 10% from nonfederal sources. except ironically and indefensibly the g.i. bill and d.o.d. educat

kudos to bill clinton for saying what he said. chars: the problem is bill is not running. hillary is running. if you talk about pandering. i think bernie sanders took it to another level. bernie sanders said any death associated with the police should automatically investigated by the feds. >> in new york city you have a federal monitor, a cb run by norman siegel with a law firm he refers the cases to. and a city councilor.r. these poor cops trying to do their jobs. every y time they make one move, they are being microscopically looked at. i talk to cops every day. they don w want to do anything because they don't want to lose their jobs. that's ridiculous.s. they are professionals and that's the way she should be treated. charles: we know they will be painted as racist. someone who hates black people and brown people because it comes straight out of the democratic playbook every election season. >> that's true. but here is what we'll look at by the time we hit the end of the line. i agree with the last comment. i did a lot of work with rudy giuliani when he was mayor of n

bill: no. people called us gv anyway. it was the easiest thing. but with the alphabet structure, to call it google ventures would kind of mislead in a way that we would not call it verily ventures. it is broader than that. it is not a google service. we tried literally 1000 or so different names and we thought gv was the most obvious evolution. emily: what is the relation between gv and off of that? bill: the same as it was between gv and google before this. we have a separate entity. i am now the ceo of it gv but we , make our investments in whatever that we like. emily: they have no access to information about start up strategies or details? bill: no, they have a similar access to information that any limited partner would get in terms of final -- of financial information, etc., but i have got no incentive to share details about what a startup is doing, as i would with intel versus google versus facebook. our job is to generate returns and help the companies grow. emily: in the world of ventu

bill: i'm bill hemmer. the trump team confirming initial reports that lewandoski will not be prosecuted. remember reporter michelle fields claim he bruised her when he grabbed her arm after a news conference in jupiter, florida. that charge came after video showed encounter last month. the criminal charge could be going away. the legal troubles may not be over. peter doocy live in washington. peter what is the status of the investigation of assault on corey lewandoski? reporter: the status, is, bill, he is off the hook. there will be official announcement by the state attorney down in florida but according to a post bit trump campaign social media director, excuse me, that announcement is going on the state will not continue its case against corey lewandoski who is charged with misdemeanor assault allegedly grabbing reporter mesh shelled fields after a press conference in jupiter, florida. fields tweeted, she was unaware. for those asking, office prosecutor asked two weeks ago if i would be okay with apolog

bill: i'm bill hemmer. we're fresh with the two republican rivals working together to stop the republican front-runner. will it work? can it work? kasich and cruz cut as deal to stay out of each other's way in a few specific states, indiana, oregon, and new mexico. this happened late last night right after our town hall here on the fox news channel. >> everyone would rather see the republican party unite early on by a nominee. i would love to have 1237 delegates today. that hasn't happened. what is good for the gop to nominate a candidate who can win and actually has a real substantive agenda. >> you can either appeal with bombast to the negative, and tell people how they're being ripped off and how everything is terrible and america loses, i choose not to do that. i tell people, yes, we have problems but i've been involved in fixing these problems throughout my career. if we go negative, we'll never get it fixed. bill: that is the past argument. senior national correspondent john roberts live in westcheste

kin singer's bill does -- kinzinger's bill does. it says f.c.c., you cannot, you shall not, you will not do rate regulation. it is not what the american people want to see. it is what the f.c.c. has promised they will not do. so what we are doing is helping a federal agency keep their word and keep their promise and not get in to rate regulation. of course we all know that what they would like to do is regulate the internet so they can tax the internet. so they can then come in and set all the rates. so they can then come in and assign priority and value to content. it is a commerce issue. it is a free speech issue. it is an issue for the american people who want to make certain that the information service they have known and appreciated and utilize every day in the virtual marketplace is not going to be regulated by a federal government agency. i yield back. the chair: the gentlewoman from tennessee yields back the balance of her time. the gentlewoman from california is recognized. ms. eshoo: thank you, mr. speaker. i would note t

this is what the bill does. and you know, frankly, the department of state here and the department of homeland security giving them this authorization to develop this open source software, to vet those travelers against the terrorist watch list and against those law enforcement databases is absolutely vital. and i would just mention that the so-called islamic state, we all it daesh or isis, it has already threatened to send hundreds of its european fighters back to the continent to carry out attacks like those attacks that they have already carried out in paris and brussels and frankly, attacks like the one they carried out in san bernardino, california. so i think this measure realy deserves our unanimous support. and i yield back the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the question is, will the house suspend the rules and pass the bill h.r. 4403 as amended? those in favor say aye. those opposed, no. in the opinion of the chair, 2/3 being in the affirmative, the rules are suspended and the bill is pass

bill chin ton in particular. but the modern democratic party more broadly, they want to appeal to the racism of working class white voters, but also win black voters over. so they use the language -- they use the language of racism while also trying to speak movement language. and it just does not work. those two things are incongruent. >> let's go to hermoned. you have -- a piece quantifying when mass incarceration really kicked in. i want to put up a chart. this looks complicated but you'll notice where the chart leaps up, that's the '80s and the line going straight down is where the crime bill happens. while the crime bill was bad policy, we all agree most was bad policy, you make the point where you say it is not the cause of mass incarceration. explain. >> right. and the reason for that is because the bill mostly focused on the federal prison system. it did have some incentives for the states to increase their prison sentences and what not. of but for the most part, focused on the federal system. and relativ

so that will make this bill even a better bill. it's one that again i applaud the -- all the work that has been done by members of the commerce committee and particularly by the chairman and the ranking member, senators thune and nelson, for getting down and getting this done. we're getting into an area where we are really being productive around this body, and i'm very proud to be a part of it. so keep your eyes open on this, and i would encourage any members who have amendments that they want to be included in this to come to the floor with their amendments and do what i'm doing right now so that we can get in the queue, we can get started and get this thing done. i don't know when we are anticipating finishing this bill. i don't see any reason why we can't do it if everyone gets amendments down by the end of this next week. with that, i yield the floor. i think we have several speakers lined up that are going to be here, and i -- so i will suggest the absence of a quorum. the presiding officer: the clerk will call the roll. quor

bill: i'm bill hemmer. good morning to you. trump and clinton both celebrating a smashing victory handing a crushing defeat to their rivals as they race for their respective nomination. >> the people of this country and the people of this state truly are great and amazing people. we're really, really rockin'. [applause] we expect we're going to have amazing number of weeks. even though we're leading by a lot and we can't be caught, it is impossible to catch us. we'll go into the convention i think as the winner. >> it is humbling, it's humbling that you trust me with the awesome responsibilities that await our next president. tonight, a little less than a year later, the race for the democratic nomination is in the homestretch and victory is in site. [cheering] the model of this state is excelsior, ever upward. let's go out and win this election and all rise together. thank you so much! bill: wow. mark your calendars, tuesday, april 26th. that is pennsylvania. maryland, rhode island and delaware, all take the spotlight martha:

jim gray live in l.a. >> thanks, bill. bill: you bet. martha: as you know there are five states up for grabs tonight. it is a big night in this whole amazing, crazy process that we have been covering. we've got all the coverage for you coming up, on the ground next. (man) hmm. what do you think? ♪ (stranger) good mornin'! ♪ (store p.a.) attention shoppers, there's a lost couple in the men's department. (vo) there's a great big un-khaki world out there. explore it in a subaru crosstrek. love. it's what makes a subaru, a subaru. bill: so what are you doing tonight? martha: i'm over here. bill: that is your spot this big m on the floor. maccallum. will be a big m here. martha: exit polls in connecticut maryland we look at tonight. bill: see you tonight. martha: see you tonight, everybody, stay signed. tuned. ♪ jon: jon: big day in politics, voters in five states head to the polls as presidential primaries race towards the finish line this summer. welcome to "happening now." i'm jon scott. heather: i'm heather childers in for jenna lee

bill: yeah. "washington post," here is what krauthamer writes about that, kind of reflects on the same point you're making. donald trump promises to make america strong which he explains he must first make america rich. treating countries like companies, trump therefore promises to play turnaround artist for a foreign policy that is currently hopeless, money-losing operation which our allies take us for fools and suck us dry, end quote. that could come from trump, that comment. >> yeah. i don't take that quite frankly as we're going to turn the u.s. military into guns for hire. i don't see it that way at all. what i take out of that is, we have to be very careful before we get involved in humanitarian intervention which was the excuse for libya. look how that turned out. some of the other things. we have to use our military very carefully. that is, only in the defense of u.s. national interests or protecting our citizens and assets period. that is what the military is for. diplomacy is for everyt

we have to change. >> so we should have a $7.50 bill? and put some women on it. >> a $420 bill. there you go. >> you know who got taken off andrew "trail of tears" jackson. >> larry: that's what people have been arguing. >> that guy was all about indian genocide. everyone time i go to an in indian restaurant it's all i see. >> and like he's judging you. like you don't deserve to hold me. >> no, he is not judging you. he had syphilis. that is the look. >> larry: and he just got electrocuted. >> it's a wonder he looked that photogenic. >> larry: okay what if they said we're getting a woman on one of the bills tomorrow but we're taking off "in god we trust." do we need that on your currency? >> people would lose their minds. yeah. >> i think there's room. there's room for everything. >> larry: why is god on our money? >> i don't know. >> i personally don't have a problem with it on money but i understand if people are offended. >> larry: are offended. do people even notice anymore? >> i think they do. >> i'm just like thank god i have money. thank god. >> larry: instead of in god w

, 60 appropriation bills. you know how many we have passed the house and the senate and actually been signed by the president? one, and that was the a compromise bill we were supposed to make a stand on. one out of 60. i don't know if the budget process in itself is a whole lot -- has a whole lot of bearing frankly based on history on how many of probation bills get passed.r don't get what we will look at is just like we have been in the past. when the bills come up in the house of representatives, we look at the individual bill, we evaluate it, the policy that is in it, spending levels, and we make a decision, but many of our members supported a number of appropriation bills, particularly the ones dealing with the military. ms. ferrechio: do you foresee omnibus bill where a lot of things are combined into one big measure like we have been seeing the last decade or so? do you think that there will be individual bills signed into law for the first time in many years? do you think that can happen? rep. jordan: w

ç >>> all right, thank you, bill. maybe turn on the wind shield wipers perhaps this morning sometime later today. let's check in with jessica boyington. >> she's looking at the schuylkill expressway. what are you seeing? >> the schuylkill expressway is doing great. right around montgomery drive. no backups right now. quiet monday morning at least for the most part. center city to the vine street expressway is a 13-minute trip. headed westbound or eastbound right now, no real problems in or out of center city. franconia, watch out for an accident scene in montgomery county. ledee road and cherry lane. berks county and douglassville, an accident, still active at 422 eastbound at old speed road. >>> there's concern in montgomery county over water. >> tests have come back positive for a cancer-causing chemical. we'll hear what lawmakers plan to do to protect the people. >>> decision 201. donald trump is retooling in hopes of refueling his presidential campaign. we'll tell you what he's doing to swing delegates his way in

bill: no. emily: how do you balance whether something is impossible? lose money, need to be correct, i need to be right, then that is the wrong business for you. emily: is that the luxury of working at google? bill: no. if we all lose money, we will not have a job anymore to it we go in optimistic there is a cure for but skeptical of every approach. that is just science. we have bioengineers and physicians on the team who spend their careers on this kind of thing. we're ok being wrong sometimes or even most of the time. google gives you as much money as you want. put it inuld not those terms are we all try to be rational. how much money can we reasonably invest and expect a good return. we do not have to fun race. it's is probably one third of our time, which will be spent raising money, with companies and other things, which is a great benefit for us. once likened a fund-raising of secret to a bank heist. --the time, it was taken in as an unfriendly comment but since then, the market has chang

this bill is similar to a bill that i introduced with mr. carney that passed the house as a part of h.r. 1675, and passed our committee by a strong bipartisan vote. as my friend from delaware said, we worked diligently to improve this legislation and worked carefully with our colleagues in the minority to make sure this bill fully represents the bipartisan consensus on the intent of the fair act. . it allows broker dealers to issue reports on the rapidly growing medium of exchange traded funds, the e.t.f. market. since i started my investment firm in the late 1990's, i seen the market grow from 100 funds and $100 billion in assets to and $14 billion in assets. and additional trillion might shift since the latest rule actually goes into effect. further, today's e.t.f.'s are complicated and require analysis on the part of investors. despite their growth in popularity and increasing importance to retail investors most broker dealers do not publish research on e.t.f. due to the anomaly in the security laws that mr. garrett so ably discussed. thr

bill: it was visceral. i had the sense she was coming into that to deliver the knockout blow before tuesday. earlier in the day ed reports that bernie sanders is in a do or die situation come tuesday. do you see it that way? have we reached that point already? >> i guess it depend on what bernie sanders' objective is here. dose think he's likely to be the democratic nominee? i think he probably doesn't in the absence of an indictment by the f.b.i. i think what he's doing today is doing what he set out to do when he entered this campaign and was at 3% compared to her 60%, and that is carry a big message and make a big argument about democratic socialism. he's doing that effectively. particularly if you look at his closing of the polls. he approaches her in national polls and his ability to raise a ton of money. bill: i think tuesday could be razor close between these two, do you, yes or no. >> i think she'll win. i'll be surprised if he is really close. but bernie sanders has outperformed before and it's pos

these are good bills. hey're smart bills and frankly they're bills make you wonder how any reasonable person can make you vote against them. but you know, i forgot how irrational some people could be. just a few days ago, the obama administration said they were against all four of these bills . really? they're against accountability? ey're against i.r.s. employees paying their taxes? they are against rehiring bad employees? i couldn't understand it, and frankly the administration statement didn't clear things up either. the office of management and budget actually said this, and i quote, these bills would impose unnecessary constraints on the internal revenue service 's operations. now, let me get one thing out of the way. the administration is worried about imposing constraints on the i.r.s., but it has no problem imposing constraints and regulations on small business, energy producers, manufacturers to the point that is driving them out of business. that shows you how backwards this administration's prio

love's bill does. we're still talking something that's tiny in the banking world, but let these holding companies get up to $5 billion. let them actually start having a fighting chance to take some of this regulatory burden that's been shoved down their throats and start to amortize it over a little bit bigger book, because if you leave it at the smaller institutions, they cannot compete. if you want to make the big banks smaller, create an environment where they face competition. this is a classic argument around here. do you believe that you make the world safer by layer and layer and layer of regulation? well, that worked great in 2008, didn't it? we're going to file our paperwork and maybe next quarter some regulator will look at it and maybe the next six months someone will write a letter about it, or do you want an environment where there's so much competition out there there's a lot of optionality in the financial markets? and that's what we're looking for here. mr. hensarling: i yield the gentl