the absence of tpp. as other countries move forward, our businesses stand to see their market share in the key countries shrink rather than expand. instead of seeing our rules in place, we'll face adverse implications for the free flow of data and the integrity of the internet, for disciplining subsidizes and stealing skbriezs, and cooperating against counterfeit medicines and consumer goods. today our country that is a choice. we can play a leadership role in writing the rules of the road for 40% of the global economy or leave the job to others whose values and interests who don't necessarily align with ours. our failure to move forward would weaken us economically, and undermine american leadership. cato's report is an important contribution to this debate providing further evidence of how valuable tpp will be to the businesses, workers, farmers, and ranchers in the united states and to america's leadership in the world's fastest growing region. we're grateful to cato for their support of this agreemen

with tpp, the u.s. is going to be on the inside and that's a lot utter them being on the out side looking in. we should not underestimate that. naftat the benefits in which is another agreement people supposedly one tooth throw out now. but what people have done to develop north american is this enterprises. u.s., canada or mexico, but north american enterprises that have a huge advantage in competition in the rest of the world because they are on the inside rather than the outside of nafta. u.s. leadership -- we have not talked about that a lot, but that is important. there's only one country that can lead will we call the western world and that is the u.s. is an opportunity to exercise leadership in asia and these kinds of opportunities to come around very often. it.eed to take advantage of we have been sitting on our hands for a number of years now in terms of demonstrating the ability to lead internationally. we have asked off instead of asserting ourselves and that to change and it needs to change

it's between the tpp and what's likely to evolve in the absence of tpp. as other countries move forward with their own market access, our businesses stand to see their market share in these key countries shrink rather than expand. and instead of seeing our roles put in place, we'll face adverse implications for the free flow of data and the integrity of the internet, for disciplining subsidies and enterprises and for kwaperating against counterfit medicines and consumer goods. we can play a leadership role and wriete in the rules or leav it to others whose interests don't necessarily align with ours. our failure to move forward would undermine american leadership. >> allows governments to acquire banking data to be stored locally. the length of data protection provided to biologic pharmaceuticals, and the provision from the isds requirements. my first reaction upon seeing the tpp provisions was that usgr must have made the unusual political calculation that it would be a good thing to do to take a sharp stick and poke both senator mcconnell and senator ha

tpp will support small businesses. its efforts to harmonize customs procedures and make countries migratory processes more transparent. these are a few of tpp's highlights, and there have been a number of studies done on the benefits of tpp, from the peterson in his attitude to the international trade commission, to the american farm bureau. tpp will all found support more well-paying export-related jobs, add consumer purchasing power, and spur economic growth he read home. both the peterson institute and the idc, which conducted the modeling studies of the agreement, found the majority of the benefits of tpp will go to is a great deal of anxiety among the american people evident in the current election dynamic, not to mention the most of the developed world. it is concerned other countries do not follow the same rules we do. they act unfairly, but the benefits of growth have been broadly shared. the system is rigged in favor of the few. it is important we not ignore these concerns. they are real and legitimate. the qu

throughll enter the tpp the back door at a later date. they are watching, studying, and they are not in it now, but if it is, they will be in it. if it is not, they will pass. the agreement will force american workers to compete directly against workers from vietnam. one of the lowest wage countries on earth. undermineill the tpp our economy, but our independence. the tpp creates a new international coalition that creates decisions the american people are no longer given the right to veto. these commissions are great for hillary's wall street funders who can spend vast amounts of money to influence the people on the commissions and the outcome. it should be no surprise that hillary clinton, according to bloomberg, took a leading part in drafting the transpacific partnership. please remember that. especially in november. [applause] mr. trump: she praised or pushed the tpp on 45 different occasions. even called it the gold standard . hillary clinton was totally for the tpp just a short while ago. stance, which is totally against, she was sh

there is no way to fix tpp. we need bilateral trade deals. we do not need to enter into another massive international agreement that ties us up and binds us down like tpp does. a trump administration will change our failed trade policies. and i mean quickly. thank you. here are seven steps i would pursue right away to bring back our jobs. number one -- i am going to withdraw the united states from the transpacific partnership which has not yet been ratified. i'm going to appoint the toughest and smartest -- and i know them all -- trade negotiators to fight on behalf of american workers. i'm going to direct the secretary of commerce to identify every violation of trade agreements a foreign country is currently using to harm you, the american worker. i will then direct all appropriate agencies to use every tool under american and international law to end these abuses. and abuse is the right word. number four. i'm going to tell our nafta partners that i intend to immediately renegotiate the terms of that agreement to get a better deal by a lot.

it's between tpp and what is likely to evolve in the absence of tpp. that cannot be more in the interests of american workers, farmers, ranchers and businesses than moving ahead with tpp. pierre mendes-france, the minister who represented france at bretton woods, said, to govern is to choose. today our government has a choice. we can write the rules of the road for 40% of the global economy or we can leave that job to others, whose values and interests don't necessarily align with ours. we can move forward with tpp, or we can walk away and be remembered as the generation that inflicted a crippling wound on america's leadership in the asia pacific region and around the world. china is executing on its strategy, rcep, the one belt-one road initiative, the asia infrastructure investment bank and other regional policies. we are one vote away from cementing our leadership in the asia-pacific region or ceding that role to others. it's just that simple. that doesn't strike me as a difficult choice. before i stop, i'd like to say a few words about ttip in the

china will enter the tpp through the back door at a later date. they are watching, they are studying, they're not in it now but they'll be in it. if it's good, they'll be there. by the way, if it's not good, they'll pass. same way, always is. not only will the tpp undermine our economy but it will undermight be mine our independence, that's what's happening. the tpp creates a new international commission that makes decisions the american people are no longer given the right to veto. these commissions are great for hillary's wall street funders who can spend vast amounts of money to influence the people on the commissions and the outcomes. it should be no surprise, then, that hillary clinton, according to bloomberg, took a leading part in drafting the transpacific partnership. please remember that. especially in november. [ applause ] she praised or pushed the tpp on 45 separate occasions. and even called it "the gold standard." hillary clinton was totally for the tpp just a short while ago, but when she saw my stance, which is totally against, she

the afl-cio is against tpp. these are the kind of people donald trump will bring into the republican party to bring success to states like pennsylvania and ohio. he's on his way to a county in ohio, a blue collar area hit hard by bad trade practices, by nafta, by tpp. used to be the heart of the steel industry. this is a very, very strong message for him. the best speech he's given all cycle. >> who writes his speeches? does he? does someone else and he makes tweaks? bring us behind the scenes of how this goes on. >> this is a particular area where mr. trump has a lot of experience understanding how bad trade deals have affected our country, understanding what job creation is all about. . these thoughts are predominantly his. there are tweets from additional members of the team. at the end of the kay day he des what goes into the speech and what doesn't. it is a clear difference from a businessman's perspective. this is a winning issue for him all day long. >> his use of teleprompter, when did this change? did h

let's talk about tpp because he went down the line on what tpp means. hillary clinton did support that in 2012 in its infancy, it wasn't finalized until after she left the obama administration, signed in 2015. donald trump says he would support it as president. where does she sand? >> she has been very clear where she stands, thomas. she waited until the details were finalized in that trade agreement and she has a very strict standard by which she judges every trade agreement. would it create american jobs? would it raise wages here and would it protect our national security in in the end when she saw the final details she decided it didn't meet the criteria. >> what do you think challenged the judgment about that more, bernie sanders or donald trump? this. >> she's been very clear where she stands on this and i have to say listening to this speech it was just astounding to me that he would give a speech about protectioning american workers when he's the king of outsourcing. as you said, let's look at his own record. he owned american businesses, he had

hillary clinton was totally for the tpp just a short while ago. but when she saw my stance, which is totally against, she was shamed into saying she would be against it too. and i will tell you, it was the same shame that she had recently where she was sort of forced into saying radical islamic terrorism, which she didn't want to say, but she was shamed into that. [ applause ] but have no doubt that she will immediately approve it if it's put before her. and that is guaranteed. guaranteed. she will do this just as she's betrayed american workers for wall street and throughout, throughout her career, her whole career, she has betrayed the american worker. she's trying to put on a good front now. she will betray you again. her career and her husband have signed so many disasters and never, ever forget nafta. just never, ever forget it. because you know what it's done and i know what it's done. and in touring, i've seen the devastation that it's left behind. here's how it would go. she would make a small token change, declare the tpp pact fixed, and

i asked opponents of tpp a simple question. do they think we are better off in a world where those are the rules of the world? the choice isn't between tpp and the status quo. it is between tpp and what is likely to involve in the absence. that cannot be in the interest of american workers. pierre, the minister who represented france at brentton woods, said to govern is to choose. today our government has a choice. we can write the rules of the road or leave that job to others. tpp ormove forward with walk away and be remembered as the generation that inflicted a crippling wound on america's leadership. china is executing on its strategy. the asia infrastructure investment bank and other regional initiatives. we are one vote away from cementing our leadership in the asia-pacific region. we are seating that role to others. that doesn't strike me as a difficult choice. i would like to say a few words about ttip and the vote in the u.k. the people in the united kingdom have made their choice. our relationship with the u.k. will re

i think tpp may be the most successful of all. nevertheless, as i pointed out earlier, we need to demonstrate becausership in asia, to some degree we are in competition with china for that leadership role. i do not see china as an adversary in trade policy. i never have. i do not now, and i do not believe that i should in the future. but i also believe that if they are in the leadership role in have you will not principles and rules of asernational trade that are effective as they would be if we are in a leadership role. in other words, they are going to be looser and will not have the disciplines that are necessary. so i want tpp to go into effect because that then becomes the basis on which we build. in the point i made earlier about being on the outside versus being on the inside is so valid here. it is not by accident that you have a whole slew of countries lining up wanting to join tpp already. and that is important. i think that is one of the great benefits of this potential agreement. flawed as it may be, it is the eating o

the tpp and its implementation. we also request that the u.s. will recognize vietnam as a marked economy and do away with technical barriers in our trade relations. we will continue. that was adopted to us last year and the defense corporation of 2011 including in the areas of this security. we will further our core -- cooperation as a priority. morepect the u.s. to give assistance to vietnam. vietnam caused u.s. to lift the arms embargo in vietnam. to reflecte removed our full nomine station at the current level of our comprehensive. cooperations such as files and technology. advance our .ooperation in these areas vietnam appreciates the u.s. continuation in all of these areas including in the area of startups. we are looking to further promote cooperation in nuclear energy. and number eight across the world. establishmenthe today every year more than 500,000 americans visit vietnam each year and week encouraged to continue greater numbers of tourists, students and businesses for these countries. we appreciate the

tpp, the world trade organization, china and hillary clinton. we'll take an in-depth look but arguably one of his strongest speeches, whether you agree with what he said. we've got british brexit bargain hunting one day after the biggest two day sell-off in history. the dow jones industrial average charging ahead by 224 points. high of the session, 242. we're almost there. what are we going to see? you've got to stick with me. europe, the markets stopped the bleeding this morning. britain's ftse, and france's cac-quarante, the two day downturn from friday through monday was epic in proportions. $3 trillion in global equities wiped out following the uk vote. i hate to remind you, that is a record number. european union leaders meeting today in emergency session, david cameron informing the leaders of 27 nations not exiting of his country's plan. cameron insisting the uk must not turn back on neighbors, friends and allies of the union if they exit from the trading bloc. fox business reporters stationed all arounded globe, the british exit and impa

more can be done especially in the context of the tpp. we believe that the tpp agreement will have enhanced trade and job expansion for all participant in countries and wider region. as a member, vietnam is committed to the tpp and it implementation. and we also request that the u.s. will recognize vietnam as a market economy and do away with technical barriers in our trade relations. on defense and security, we will continue our bilateral as onation in these areas defense relations. adopted last year, 2000 and eight. and -- 2015. and the cooperation in 2011. including areas like search and rescue. we will further our cooperation as a priority -- issues and we expect the u.s. to give more assistance to vietnam in funding and technology. [indiscernible] vietnam calls on the u.s. to lift the arms embargo in vietnam. and believe that this is a barrier of the past and should be removed to reflect our normalization of relations. of we have a lot corporations and other areas -- cooperations in other areas, such as education and technology. we f

vietnam is committed to the tpp and its implementation. we also request that the u.s. recognize vietnam as a market economy and do away with technical barriers in our trade relations. on defense and security we will continue our bilateral cooperation in these areas as -- statement on defense relations that was adopted june last year, 2015, and the defense cooperation m.o.u. of 2011. including in the areas of maritime security, search and rescue, disaster relief and peace keeping. we will further our cooperation as a priority -- and we expect the u.s. to give more assistance to vietnam in terms of both funding and technology in the clearance of -- dioxin medication including new projects such as the vietnam p airport. vietnam calls on the u.s. to totally lift the arms embargo on vietnam and believe that this element or barrier of the past should be removed to reflect our first normalization of relations starting to decay in our comprehensive partnership. we have a lot of other areas such as education, science and technology, people to peopl

this will be your pro-tpp and anti--tpp. remember paul ryan was pushing for tpp which is extremely important. now you have asia, asian infrastructure bank formed last year. that will create more competition. we also see that this trade pact they're trying to move forward here in the united states is going to be devastating to american jobs. even going to overhaul wages. that is a problem. hillary clinton supports tpp even though now she says she is against it. mr. trump has always been against tpp i think now you will hear that stance. we don't want to eliminate anyone from competing or importing or exporting. we're saying you can't continue to punish us to reap all benefits. melissa: everybody looking ahead to the convention. it is a little more than two weeks away. there is a report coming out from one of the competing networks saying that mr. trump is individualing chris christie for vp -- vetting chris christie for vp. what do you think about that, katrina? >> i think cnn, i think they're talking about -- melissa: go ahe

they want to have tpp, trans-pacific partnership. one of the worst deals. it will be the worst deal since nafta. remember when jeb would say he is not a conservative. i say, who cares. they think, see, to be a conservative you have to have free trade. >> trump is making a play for some bernie democrats, obviously, but president obama had harsh words in response when he was asked about trump while in canada. >> that's nativism. or xenophobia. or worse. or it's just cynicism. i would just advise everyone, be careful about suddenly attributing to whoever pops up at a time of economic anxiety. the label that they're a populist. where have they been? on the front lines working on behalf of the people? have they been carrying the opportunity to open up tupts for more people. >> trump's ideology is a throwback to republican ideology pre-world war ii. go back to warren g. harding. when that's republican, when he took office, he boosted tariffs, even passed a 1921 quota law that put limits on immigration in the united states. then you can look to the '40s and see si

it's between tpp and what's likely to evolve in the absence of tpp and that cannot be in the interest of american workers, farmers, ranchers and businesses thar than moving ahead with tpp. pierre, the minister who represented france at bretten wood said to govern is to choose. today we can write the rules of the road for 40% of the global economy or leave that job to others who values and interests don't necessarily align with ours. we can mo forward or walk away and be remembered as the generation that inflicted a crippling wound. china is executing on its strategy, the one belt one road initiative, the asia infrastructure and other regional initiatives. we are one vote away from cementing our leadership in the asia pacific region or seating that role to others. it's that simple. and that doesn't strike me as being a difficult choice. before i stop i would like to say a few words about the aftermath of the vote in the eu. our relationship with the uk will remain special and the relationship with the eu will remain strong and denduring, we're eval wauatinevaluating. we've made a lot o

of tpp already. i think it is something that would make all of north america, u.s., canada, and mexico, more integrated into the pacific economy than they would be already but i don't think they would be less integrated with one another. i think the common supply chains across the border would be more important, frankly, then exports to the asian market. it is not something i would expect to decrease the tie at all. sec. gutierrez: i agree with that. theco has a border with u.s. and that will never go away. that is an amazing asset. since the 1980's there has been this manufacturing culture developing in mexico going all the way back to dennings, physical process control, all of those. it was taken seriously throughout the country. mexican manufacturers are very good and very competitive. planted in mexico will tell you that is probably one of the most productive plants. it is a good hub for manufacturing, the border with the u.s.. i bet on that long-term. >> thank you for being here. i am with the e

threatening to opt out of tpp and renegotiate nafta. if an effort to restore millions of lost manufacturing jobs here at home, plans that have drawn a heavy dose of political friendly fire from gop business leaders. the u.s. chamber of commerce tweeting, under trump's trade plans, we would see higher prices, fewer jobs, and a weaker economy. >> this tpp sets the gold standard in trade agreements to open free, transparent, fair trade. >> reporter: that was hillary clinton, just 3 1/2 years ago, singing the praises of tpp. but in a classic political flip-flop, clinton now says she no longer supports the agreement as is, and expressing a similar opposition to nafta, which she once backed and was proudly promoted by her husband, then president bill clinton. in that piece you saw a bit of political friendly fire and it continued on twitter. the national association of manufacturers tweeted mr. trump by saying, you have it backwards. trade is book for manufacturing workers, and jobs, and he added the #makeamericatradeagain. now, for their par

and now they want to go into tpp, trans-pacific partnership. that will make nafta in my opinion look like a baby. now, we don't play the game the way they play the game. they play the game to win. we play the game in this country to survive. we are going to start playing the game to win. >> well, the two most pressing concerns for many americans right now are terror, of course, and the economy. donald trump says he has answers to both. he's going to renegotiate trade deals and get tough with china and he's going to take the gloves off against isis. he says the country's falling apart, that we have even worse to fear from hillary clinton. >> the trans-pacific partnership is another disaster. done and pushed by special interests. who want to rape our country, just the continuing rape of our country. >> hillary clinton unleesashed trade war against the american worker when she supported one terrible deal after another. >> you will be hurt worse than ever before if she becomes president. >> isis was created during the hillary clinton regime. if she

i support the tpp. in fact, i went to paul ryan when he was chairman of ways and means, and i asked if he needed a democrat to support, and i think is probably the only democrat that signed on to the bill on the trade promotion authority. i support tpp for different reasons. one, we are the leader, and we should act like a leader in the world economy, and we should not shrink away from the power that we have. us-made goods. 18,000two, we will have tax cuts, tariffs, which means that 18,000 tariffs will be cut across the world, at least on those 11 other countries dealing with the u.s. and the tpp that will be reduced, which means that we can send our agriculture products, cars, and other things to compete. 18,000 tax cuts we will have so we can send american-made products outside of the u.s., where 95% of the consumers are at or the third thing, which is extremely important, is this -- if we are not engaged in the rules, in the rules of trade, fair trade, then you're going to let china, you are going to

canada has not taken a position on the tpp. it's the only of 12 countries to have not stated whether it intends to ratify or not. do you think it would be helpful for canada to join with mexico and the united states to make a strong statement about the tpp? would that help with the ratification process here in the united states and secondly, do you think that's likely? >> well tpp was negotiated under the previous administration in canada. and when the trudeau administration came in, they made clear that he wanted to go through a robust consultation process around the country, different sectors and different parts of the country to make sure they had the input of a wide range of stakeholders before moving forward with tpp. and that's the process they're undergoing. we respect that decision. we respect that process. and i don't think it has significant impacts here in the yees on congress's consideration of tpp. >> okay. right here. >> i'm looking at this from a different perspective. my name is martin apple. i'm a scientist fro

of r radification of tpp. mexico is a tpp signatory. it's the exact opposite of what many trump recommendations are on trade. i have two questions. one is presuming that we don't rad if i, what's the effect going to be on mexico. and talk about the economic advantages for mexico if we do ratify. >> on the first one, which is one i generally prefer not to think about, but if e we don't ratify, i think there's a real risk to the u.s. in its relationship with mexico, but more broadly in its relationship as a global leader with a lot of countries. and trade is going to happen regardless of what we do with tpp. and as i was saying before, the big question is how do i want to shake these economic relati relationships. what do you want the rules of the road to be? and tpp sets up a certain set of rules of the road. i think getting into not ratify after having exhibited a lot of leadership, getting those to be put in place place in asia and across the pacific rim on this side of the pacific, would be seen as this mass

tpp has been controversial. countries, including australia, japan, canada, mexico, malaysia, and vietnam signed, accounting for 44% of the u.s. economy, the biggest trade deal since nafta in 1994. the tpp may this unravel. donald trump and hillary clinton both oppose the deal. companies like ford motors say it should put a limit on a country's ability to manipulate its currency. say it protects company profits at the expense of workers, and some u.s. lawmakers between -- twoo tweaked. angie: what is the chance it will be ratified? >> it has the best chance of being ratified after the u.s. elections in november, before the new term begins in january. john mccain said exactly that when he was in singapore last weekend. the deal may still unravel if there is any temp to -- any k the tpp in twea any way. the pact has been submitted to parliament for japan itself. thebeing discussed ahead of singapore prime minister's visit to d.c. and august, tpp expected to be on the agenda. angie: thank you so much for that. here'

threatening to opt out of tpp and renegotiate nafta. if an effort to restore millions of lost manufacturing jobs here at home, plans that have drawn a heavy dose of political friendly fire from gop business leaders. the u.s. chamber of commerce tweeting, under trump's trade plans, we would see higher prices, fewer jobs, and a weaker economy. >> this tpp sets the gold standard in trade agreements to open free, transparent, fair trade. >> reporter: that was hillary clinton, just 3 1/2 years ago, singing the praises of tpp. but in a classic political flip-flop, clinton now says she no longer supports the agreement as is, and expressing a similar opposition to nafta, which she once backed and was proudly promoted by her husband, then president bill clinton. in that piece you saw a bit of political friendly fire and it continued on twitter. the national association of manufacturers tweeted mr. trump by saying, you have it backwards. trade is book for manufacturing workers, and jobs, and he added the #makeamericatradeagain. now, for their par

you know me. >> tpp never sounded so sexy. president obama doing the slow jam with jimmy fallon and the gang on the "tonight" show last night. the president definitely entertained. last night marks the first time a sitting president ever appeared on the "tonight" show. president obama definitely delivered. >> he is mastering the art of a signature sign-off. >> the president of the united states barack obama -- we'll be right back! >> a mike drop with some authority as potus exits stage right. this isn't the president's first mike drop. he pulled it off at the correspondent's dinner in may. >> pretty smooth there. >> i have nothing as cool as that, but we will have cool weather into the start of the weekend. i'll show you warmer air for the weekend coming up. >> we are looking over here. clear view of the golden gate bridge. they just got things aligned for that morning commute. >> overnight we received the case report from the brock turner special assault trial. this picture was submitted as evidence. jamie will join us with a

they are hearing from about whats, both the upside is associated with tpp, but also with the dangers are of not getting to it in a timely way. it has big economic impacts, billions of dollars for the u.s. economy, and, in fact, if we do not get it done this year, and that is about $700 per american family. it also has a big impact on u.s. leadership and our influence in the region. david: how has it changed since you went up to capitol hill? fundamentally. they are there to represent their constituents, and they care about how this affects their core constituency of theirs, and as they dig in, it is quite consistent. what it does for farmers or ranchers or for the manufacturing sector, for services, for the technology community, and the members of congress are having quite a positive response. david: it has become such a campaign,issue this china not part of the tpp, very much looming large as you make the case for it on capitol hill. mr. froman: that is right. there are a couple of things going on. the u.s. leadership in the region. those at the table helps set the rules of the road

i agreed in the platform with warren gunnel's assessment of tpp and other trade deals. that was not what was at issue with this. this was -- the concern here was about essentially embarrassing the president which we didn't want to do. >> nebrasera, what about on fracking, what is the explanation there? >> i have to say the reality of this document is that we tried to do a lot of work on climate, we have very bold language about climate in here. the issue on fracking is that the platform really represents hillary's position on this issue, which is to make fracking very difficult, you knew, but leave it to states, but most states under the mechanisms she said wouldn't actually go forward with fracking. the reality of this is also that the platform in some regards is going to represent hillary clinton's position more than senator sanders' position. i think that is reasonable given that she won the primary process. but, you know, this is not a winner take all assessment. so on glass-steagall and a whole range of issues, financial transaction tax we have really strong langua

not just in all of our trade agreements, which the tpp does not have, but also domestically. there have been several attempts legislatively to basically not have just reports and reviews triggered, but snap back penalties so that when a country is actually meeting the criteria of the imf of manipulating that before the flood of imports wipes out more jobs and wages, there's an immediate reflex. >> thank you very much. i appreciate your comments. while we don't have a bilateral trade agreement with china, we did pass normal trade relations with china in 1999 and 2000 and since that time according to the economic policy institute, we have lost some $3.2 million american jobs since china was ed a mitted to the world trade organization. with the transpacific partnership and others is really about exporting american products from the u.s. to asia. we have a much different perspective. we have seen corporations like nabisco move to mexico. we have seen large corporations like general electric shut down manufacturing plants in the united states and move to china and where we're comi

. >> hillary clinton was totally for the tpp just a short while ago. but when she saw my stance which is totally against, she was shamed into saying she would be against it too. >> okay, this one is partly true. hillary clinton was shamed into disavowing the tpp but the person without shamed her wasn't trump, the real credit goes to bernie sanders. (applause) you guying know he lost, right? that's right, hillary changed her position when bernie started challenging her from the left. donald trump is basically stealing from an old man. so i give this claim a henriettea, that is my grandfather's nurse. he claims she's stealing from him but like, what is she going to do with some cough drops and an orthopedic shoe. i mean it's really sad but the guy is 94 years old, and honestly i don't know why he is still hanging on. let go, pop pop, let go. i'm sorry, where was i? oh, the tpp. >> number one, i am going to withdraw the united states from-- the transpacific partnership. >> that is false. you want to be president of the united states, not the united strait

china will enter the tpp through the back door at a later date. they are watching, they are studying, they're not in it now but they'll be in it. if it's good, they'll be there. by the way, if it's not good,

from the tpp deal if elected. do you expect that trade will continue to be a big heart of this campaign? >> i think so. campaign, in particular, is trying to make pennsylvania into a battleground state. it has not been one for years. in ohio, secretary clinton has had some difficulty in some of primary states where these are important issues. there is a sense from trump that he can go by the bernie sanders playbook. he even invoked bernie sanders in an area where the far left , sayingfar right agree i am opposed to bad trade deals deal.p is a bad trade nafta is a bad trade deal. i would end all of these things or renegotiate them. it's very much something he thinks will be appealing to populist anger on both sides of the il. from my perspective, when i read that intellectual elites , areehind trade deals there educated, intelligent members of the elite who do think we have gotten wrought trade deals, who do think corporate members of the u.s. who have wanted to sell their goods overseas have given bad deals to the

i support the tpp. in fact, i went to paul ryan when he was chairman of ways and means, and i asked if he needed a democrat to support, and i think is probably the only democrat that signed on to the bill on the trade promotion authority. i support tpp for different reasons. one, we are the leader, and we should act like a leader in the world economy, and we should not shrink away from the power that we have. us-made goods. 18,000two, we will have tax cuts, tariffs, which means that 18,000 tariffs will be cut across the world, at least on those 11 other countries dealing with the u.s. and the tpp that will be reduced, which means that we can send our agriculture products, cars, and other things to compete. 18,000 tax cuts we will have so we can send american-made products outside of the u.s., where 95% of the consumers are at or the third thing, which is extremely important, is this -- if we are not engaged in the rules, in the rules of trade, fair trade, then you're going to let china, you are going to

tpp, the world trade organization, china and hillary clinton. we'll take an in-depth look but arguably one of his strongest speeches, whether you agree with what he said. we've got british brexit

he'll be in pennsylvania today talking about these issues, tpp, nasa. this is quite a departure from what we have seen other republicans be able to do in these rust belt states. you typically see them go there and talk about government or regulations, squelching businesses. this is something new from a republican. this idea that they are against free trade. we wrill see what that does for donald trump's message if he is able to do better amongst working class, white voters. a voting bloc that is already key to republicans to begin with in these rust belt states. donald trump is trying to do better. that would be key to any kind of chances that he has of winning the white house in november. >> sense you mentioned a departure, i'm going to talk about another departure if i can. that is, donald trump has really got a big departure from the muslim ban, which was the cornerstone of his prime campaign. other than build a wall, he is saying, we need to target the terror countries and look at the muslims that come from the terror countries. my crafty and trust

another split with his party on tpp. that major trade deal shep herted through by speaker ryan and others. trump today doubling down on his positions that go against some of the republican orthodoxy. trump doesn't seem to mind. he seems to think it's working for him. he mentioned some of these polls out there. talked about a quinnipiac poll that shows him a couple of points behind hillary clinton. trump seems to believe this is a sign that he is coming within striking distance of clinton. in swing states, doing okay in ohio and pennsylvania. here in maine, it's a blue state. hasn't vote forward a republican candidate for president since 1988. trump's strategy here is to try to steal a couple of, at least one, electoral vote given how maine's system works. the big headlines from the speech today, his emphasis on trade. his one oblique passing reference to the attack in turkey was commenting on how coverage of that basically blew up coverage of his speech on trade. that's why you're seeing trump talk about that. seven acti

i don't favor the tpp policy either. i'm dead set against it, but i don't trust him, and you should know that hillary clinton is opposed to tpp, as is bernie sanders. the fact is, was he wearing a trump tie made in china when he made this denouncement of trade? was he wearing one of those bangladesh trump t-shirts that he imports into our country and has made in bangladesh where there's been very serious labor policies? do you know he was quoted saying he loves to take advantage of cheap labor. he wrote a blog saying how much he's in favor of globalization and how much he wants to take advantage of it. so he's just a complete fraud. nothing he says is true. everything is designed to get a certain kind of response. you know, he's even backtracking on his muslim ban, which he seemed to be so dead set on. nothing the man says is honest and truthful. he's not even sincere about the bigotry he espouses. >> you just mentioned the muslim ban and there's been -- this is one of his signature campaign policy issues, if you could c

recently said she opposes the tpp. in a 2012 video circulated by republicans today, she appeared to be of a different mind. >> this tpp sets the gold standard in trade agreements to open free, transparent, fair trade. >> reporter: as president, trump today said he would immediately withdraw from the tpp, renegotiate nafta to get a better deal, remedy trade disputes by imposing tariffs. the sort of stuff that ignites trade wars, democrats say. beware of trump's siren song about jobs, pointing out many of his branded products are outsourced to places like asia. clinton underscored the point by tweeting out a trump shirt made in bangladesh. he insists bold action will bring back american jobs. >> if we're going to deliver real change we have to reject the campaign of fear and intimidation, being pursued by powerful corporations, media links and political dynasties. >> reporter: in pushing back against hillary clinton's warnings about tariffs and trade, he pointed to ronald reagan, who once imposed stiff tariffs on foreign

vietnam is committed to the tpp and its implementation. we also request that the u.s. recognize vietnam as a market economy and do away with technical barriers in our trade relations. on defense and security we will continue our bilateral cooperation in these areas as -- statement on defense relations that was adopted june last year, 2015, and the defense cooperation m.o.u. of 2011. including in the areas of maritime security, search and rescue, disaster relief and peace keeping. we will further our cooperation as a priority -- and we expect the u.s. to give more assistance to vietnam in terms of both funding and technology in the clearance of -- dioxin medication including new projects such as the vietnam p airport. vietnam calls on the u.s. to totally lift the arms embargo on vietnam and believe that this element or barrier of the past should be removed to reflect our first normalization of relations starting to decay in our comprehensive partnership. we have a lot of other areas such as education, science and technology, people to peopl

. >> host: but what about the tpp which you have come out against as well? >> guest: so has she. >> host: is that a recent position, or is that a long-held position? >> guest: it's more recent than bernie's, but it's not really recent, about six months ago, i guess, she came out against the tpp. after the actual language of the tpp came out, she said she studied it, and she didn't agree with it. >> host: in your particular case when it comes to the communication workers of america, do call centers, is that one of the outsourcing things that hurt your workers, in your view? when they, when they have call centers in the philippines or india or wherever? >> guest: absolutely. we, during the strike, we got a call from some call center workers in the philippines. so we went some strikers and one of my employees over to the philippines to find out what was going on. and we found out that verizon was sending a lot more work to the philippines than we even knew that they were. and, you know, companies do this all the time. for instance, we a few years ago got a deal