of the supreme court. i found although we talk about justices of the liberal or conservative or appointed by democrat or republican what we find is that something that unites the justices throughout history is that they are generally business friendly and whether they are liberal or conservative they tend to side with interest of business and capital and the phenomenon i study in my book with this self conscious claiming of constitutional protection in the supreme court giving them protection to corporations, one manifestation of the larger phenomenon. >> host: with the corporation how american businesses when their civil rights comes out in early 2018. in your view, what has been the impact of this? >> guest: this has had a huge impact with the corporate rights movement really one of the unknown yet hugely successful civil rights movement in american history where like racial minorities and women in lg bt people left ought to gain protect it-- protection and equal rights, same thing with corporations wher

supreme court are bound by the supreme court's pronouncements. and i would never want a litigant in my court, in my current cart even to think that i might not fairly follow the precedence of the u.s. supreme court, because i absolutely will. your second question i think was is there a right to privacy in the constitution. >> is there a right to privacy embedded, is the analysis that's led to the establishment and this series affirmed supreme court opinions correct? >> well, again, senator, i don't think it would be appropriate for me to comment on whether the decisions of the u.s. supreme court are right or wrong, but you are absolutely right to note that since griswold versus connecticut the supreme court has recognized a right to privacy. that has been more than 40 years. i couldn't tell you the exact date of griswold, i alleges. >> let me move forward if i could, we have just a few minutes. the other point i was goegt was they moved beyond the privacy analysised on which griswold and rowe rest and inserted a difference analysis. but one last

of congress can open with prayer, the supreme court can open with prayer. >> members of the supreme court where a black robe doesn't mean i have to wear a black robe and -- just the other day in front of the supreme court the 10 commandments someone raised the question and made the point it does depend on the context, say get rid of it i wouldn't have a problem, do you believe there should be school prayer in the classroom. >> nothing stops an acknowledgment of god to force children to pray or force anybody to believe a certain way is wrong and certainly if schoolchildren were forced to pray a certain way it would not be a problem. who writes the prayer? if it is written -- it depends on the context. i can't say you have to give me a specific example, a teacher mandates a certain prayer, children have to be observed, it would be wrong a. if you say children are allowed to pray in the school, that would be permissible. >> host: i'm talking about an organized prayer, the supreme court never said kids can't pray in the school, there will always be prayer in school as long as there are math t

so all of the appellate courts, particularly in the supreme court. it is staffed with these fantastic appellate lawyers, who stayed from administration to administration. there are only two people that the president appoints, to the solicitor general's office, all of the rest are people who are there regardless of party or administration. and they are remarkable lawyers, incredibly generous people, and they basically taught me everything that i know. whatever that is. [laughter] >> do you remember your first argument? did you start off with sort of the intermediate appellate courts or did you start off the. justice kagan: i didn't actually have that opportunity. my first argument was a special session of the supreme court. they call it a special session just so i can do my first case, which was a reargument of citizens united. [groans] justice kagan: sounds as though you know it. [laughter] it was all about campaign finance regulation. it had been thought of as a small case when it had been argued by the deputy solicitor general. and then the court d

supreme court. if you wanted to live a short life, retire from the u.s. supreme court. and so, justices have tended to stay for a very long time. my very favorite quote from thurgood marshall. toward the end of his tenure he was interviewed by the washington post and they asked him if he planned to retire anytime soon as he was in his 80's. he said, "absolutely not. i was appointed to a lifetime tenure. and i intend to serve every single day of that. not only that, i plan to live to be over 100 years old, and not only that, when i finally die i plan to be shot by a jealous husband." >> [laughter] justice bolick: that's quite the aspiration. nonetheless he served on the court for a good, long time. but of course, longevity has dramatically increased lifetime tenure. at the time of our nation's founding, the average age of appointment of a supreme court justice is about the same as it is today. it was age 50 and that time. however, life expectancy at that time was in the 30's. so, the average age of t

he has argued before the supreme court. he has received numerous honors for his work, including being named in north carolina superlawyer annually since 2006. the name a fellow with the college of labor and employment lawyers, and most recently receiving a ranking of unanimously well-qualified to serve on the federal bench by the american bar association. he's also demanded gets back to his community. currently he is serving as a board member of the shepherds table soup kitchen in raleigh, north carolina. in addition, his significant professional experience, the committee has received letters of support for his nomination from individuals of both parties. no one can personally i can attest that he has the requisite expertise, character and judgment required for the federal bench. he's in and was earned the right to serve as a federal judge and who understands the privilege of receiving this appointment turkey will serve in this role honorably, and it's my hope that he will get a swift confirmation by this committee and by t

majority on the supreme court. one of the things i found in my book although we talk about justices as being liberal or conservative or appointed by democrat or republican will we find women look at history is something that unites the justices most of the justices throughout history as they are generally business and whether they are liberal or conservative acanthus side between a just and capital. a phenomenon i study my book is the self conscious claiming of constitutional protections and the supreme court giving them constitutional protection to corporations. this was one manifestation of that larger phenomenon. >> host: "we the corporations" how american businesses won their civil rights. in your view what is the impact? >> guest: the corporate rights movement is one of the great unknown yet hugely successful sofa rights movement in american history where racial minorities and women and lgbt people have fought to gain constitutional protections and gain equal rights were once denied, the same thing with corpor

supreme court. but the first-ever independent. every other justice has been either a republican or a democrat. and so i'm the first who is not affiliated with a party. i am also the first justice to hang up on the governor when he called to offer me the position. this was not intentional. it was and i'm embarrassed to admit it in silicon valley of all places i'm a total te technophobe, i can't figure out to get off of one call and on to the other. my friends say the better explanation is i was exhibiting my view of the proper separation of powers. but nonetheless, fortunately for me, the governor tk my call when i called him back and offered me the position. i'm also the first member of the arizona supreme court and possibly any supreme court in the country to be openly inked. i among the many clients i represented over the years were the owners of a tattoo studio. in tempe, arizona, a place that houses a major university, so you would think that there would probably be some tattoo studio and these

and so he went to the supreme court along without that. and beard asking in the supreme court that the history of the government be this train from sending them across the border because were they to be sent across the border as surely the might be murder they've been might be relieved and terrible consequence of the fall and then we're very optimistic that the supreme court will intervene and not allow the government to do such an excessive act or depredation ok now you've also been working on some major social and economic cases can you fill us in a bit on that i think if your reporter earlier it was mentioned that the right to food case was one of our landmark case and that was an incredible case because a single organization that people's union for civil liberties with the human rights law as its lawyers for tickets on behalf of four hundred fifty million people and be brought such as.

he's argued before the supreme court. he's received numerous honors for his work, including being named a north carolina superlawyer annually since 2006, being named a fellow with the college of labor and employment lawyers and most cently receiving a recommendation to serve on the bar association. he's a man that gives back to his community. currently serving as a board member of the soup and kitchen in raleigh, north carolina. . the committee received letters of support from his nomination from individuals of both parties. knowing him personally, i can ttest he has the requisite expertise required for the bench and he earned the right to serve as federal judge and who understands the privilege of receiving this appointment. he will serve honorly and it's my hope he'll get a swift confirmation by this committee and the united states senate. senator till us, let me add at the end, most important thing is tom farr is a good man and i think what woe look for are good people to serve in the capacity of district judge. he fil

it's interesting to be discussing immigration in the context of the supreme court because the supreme court doesn't typically grant a lot of grants for a lot of immigration cases. they are typically in the last 10 years, maybe one, two, maybe three. and not necessarily raising big constitutional questions. this year the court has already agreed to hear three cases. of course, the one that was referred to arising from the muslim entry ban in two consolidated cases but also two cases that were heard last year and then scheduled for reargument in this term with the ninth justice being appointed. jennings vs. rodriguez and sessions vs. dimaya. i will talk about the entry ban case although i will say about rodriguez as well and dimaya if there is time. especially insofar as they raise similar issues. by way of context for those who are less familiar how constitutional issues arise in the immigration context, there's a long -- there's two -- oversimplify and say there are two lines of cases that are somewhat in tension with each other. on one hand going to cases dating back to the 19th cent

decisions or supreme court decisions. >> in the 91 amendment supreme court decisions but importantly the supreme court found ratification in circumstances where congress has rejected lower court decisions. i point to lower court versus pond which was cited in our brief, the supreme court did two things that are critical here which were rejected expressly the arguments made by the eeoc today. >> i understand your argument but wouldn't you have a more powerful argument if sexual orientation discrimination cases where cases in 1991 in the context of that specific act congress specifically dealt with, congress knew how to deal with specific acts, did so in the 1991 decision specific court decisions but didn't do so with sexual orientation discrimination. why are you saying we can make that leap, to say even though they didn't talk about it they really did. >> three points about that. the first is that is what the supreme court did where the question in the case was whether the ada had a jury trial, trying to incorporate the contact, lowered courts thought the supreme court, lower courts

was adopting and brown, the supreme court said yes. if that issue came up before justice scalia, what you think his response would have been? then or wouldbeen have been 20 or 30 years later? >> i think justice scalia would have said what we apply to the states, we should apply to the federal government. yes, the argument that somehow due process is the same thing as equal protection is pretty hard -- is a pretty hard logical case to make, but i would make this point. being a judge requires statesmanship, not simply logic. we see that best in chief justice marshall. such an embedded part of our political understanding, and for extremely , that there is no reason to look back at that, reconsider it. better to say how should we interpret the basic commitment to racial equality as expressed in the view of the court, which is that racial classifications are inherently suspect. that should apply to the federal government as well as the states. >> yes, ma'am? chaired an independent regulatory agency, i can speak to the point of using committ

you sit there on the supreme court as one of nine people. and the constitution and bill of rights are a strength for this country. justice ginsberg: do you know d forong "valid -- "balla america?" charlie: yes. justice ginsberg: there is a line and that is the right to speak my mind is america. the other is diversity of our country. this was brought home to me in the 1960's. i was off in sweden for four months. my first subway ride when i came back to new york, i look at the people in that car, from every race, every region of the world. somehow, we have been able to be many, and yet, one, in our attachment to freedom and liberty. and i grew up, i memorized the lazarus -- emma lazarus' poem. this country is a country that americans,or native in this country, we all have a origin from someplace else. people came here seeking freedom, economic well-being -- charlie: freedom from religious persecution. freedom from to tally in their -- totalitarianism. justice ginsberg: and that is what the land of liberty is. it is a land that welcomes people.

court in the orders of the supreme court so it's quite a remarkable thing that you could have a court making an order in a single case on behalf of such a large section of people we've also fight cases on that that victims that this is a big big men who wanted to act with acid by men who had been rejected as to go so to speak and that a large number is the country which are currently going on and you also find again it was say. treat hundred thousand farmers have committed suicide in the country you do lack of resources i like to wish you the most success with all of your efforts and once again congratulations it certainly has a much deserved award call and can solve if you don't if you don't mind to see one more day ok people of germany maybe have thought that they have contributed to our success because the people of germany support red for that word that means here or who have been our steadfast partners for a long long time thank you for the people of germany ok well thank you for that message as well calling us office for us joining us from go i thank you very much for joining us

what the supreme court said. there is a good chance by the time this case is argued next month that it will be regarded as moot. i should note that professor leaderman has written quite a bit this issue on i think on just security and i would commend those pieces to you. because presumably the period will have ended now that the states have been limited and by the -- stays have been limited and by the oral argument comes around, all of the time limits in the executive order even as modified will now in fact have run. it's also -- by then, presumably then a new executive order issued and the focal point of this issue will turn to that. should it reach the merits, it's not by any means it will be ultimately be decided on constitutional grounds because there are statutory issues and so it may well be either by avoidance grounds or straightforward statutory interpretation the court doesn't reach these constitutional questions. let me with just a couple minutes left say something about jennings because i think especia

why in the lower court justices are not sitting on the supreme court. a whole group of people are a lot smarter than sitting federal judges. there's no surprise here. this was entirely predictable. charles: scott, you are laughing but what's so funny? this is the purview of the executive branch of the united states government and all of a sudden you do have lower courts judges who are acting in an activist manner here. seems like the supreme court is trying to clean us up. >> maybe, maybe not but i wouldn't say the circuit courts in the federal courts are less intelligent or less abiding of the law than the supreme court. here's the deal, the 1952 statute that greg talks about certainly is in place and it's within the purview of the executive that no matter what the executive cannot highlight the first amendment cannot violate religious freedoms and even those individuals who come here, they are coming here has to be reviewed under the contents of the u.s. constitution. the lower courts found that offensive and discriminatory if you will and it could ha

is he the best-- selling book in the supreme court gift shop. when he died. >> rose: the supreme chef s that what his tight sell. >> supreme chef, a election of-- . >> rose: his recipes. >> his recipes. marty was very popular with the supreme court spouses. they met quarterly for lunch. and they rotated catering responsibilities. and marty was always the number one picked to be cocaterrer. >> rose: it just goes on and on, folks, i'm telling you. i've been in her office. so when were you given an honorary degrea at columbia, was it columbia, i think, and you were sang to on his knee, was it columbia? >> oh, no, that was-- . >> rose: was that harvard. >> yes, the famous serenade. >> rose: tell the story. >> so i get the list of norees. >> rose: honorary degree at harvard. this is the one they gave you because you refused to be given an honorary degree from the law school, insisted it had to be the whole university. the university cappity lated and gave you an honorary degree and among the people there was the great opera singer. >> and they didn't

a supreme court justice. and i werescalia from that area. >> all throughout history it has been a important place. >> it is the one court of appeals that has a nationwide drop it after the civil war lincoln disbanded what was the districtt of appeals of columbia circuit. they were allt confederate sympathizers. the court ofhould appeals and the nations capital have a bunch of southerners? it should be drawn from across the country. the d.c. circuit is the one circuit where a nominee can come from any place. the other circuits, the regional circuits, from that area. >> do you take great pride and the decisions on gay marriage and equality? >> do i take great pride? it is the court doing the job that the constitution decided. [applause] i am asking?hat this is something you believed in. the issues presented by the case spoke to your own philosophy of the individual. >> the case would never have every day people did not begin to care. i think change came about because gay people who were once in the closet afrai

welcome to the annual supreme court preview. i'm karis, vice president of policy and programs at acs. most of you likely know this is a national network of lawyers, law students, judges and policymakers who believe that the law should be enforced to improve people's lives. here we are again. after a supreme court term that many felt was lackluster despite the delayed addition of the knife justice to the bench, we are looking at an upcoming term that promises the high-stakes that we had grown accustomed to in recent years. you need only look at the first two weeks of oral arguments to see what i mean. during the first five days the court will consider the constitutionality of the president's troubled man, legitimacy of wisconsin's redistricting scheme and whether american workers can be forced to arbitrate their disputes with their employers as opposed to having a day in court. some might say the stakes are too high and to lead us through the discussion today is a distinguished panel. we welcome a newcomer to this in no event. he

we're currently in the supreme superior court chamber. this is part of the design of joseph houston's plan for the capital that the rear central portion of the fourth floor would have the court chamber. this is one of three, one of three supreme and superior court chambers in which the court can meet. the dome here in the supreme court was actually meant to be over top of the house chamber, we believe, and it was brought here as they -- they were adding a fifth floor to the building. even as the building was being constructed in 1906 they were running out of space so they added more rooms on the top and moved the dome which was already in production here. this green stain glass dome was done by alfred god win. it's got basically a penthouse over top that let's light in over the sides. it's foe lit from the inside so on cloudy dates it's lit up. this room is the final room that violet oakley produced. she spent 25 years to -- the first commission she got was in 1902, these works were installed in 1927. she worked on the senate and supreme

the supreme court said that was okay. it was okay because places where liquor by the drink is sold can be dangerous. they made very light of it. and then in 1961, when the court decided the case of hoyt against florida, it was a woman who today we would call battered her philandering husband humiliated her to the breaking point. she spied her young son's baseball bat in the corner of the room and brought it down over her husband's head with all her might, he fell, hit his head against the hard floor end of their altercation and beginning of the murder prosecution. they didn't put women under those rules. she argued it denies me the opportunity to be judged by a jury of my peers. my peers, of course, include women. the supreme court in another glib opinion said women have nothing to worry about. they have the best of both worlds. if they want to serve they can go to the clerk's office and volunteer. and the exemption is perfectly reasonable because after, the woman is the center of home and family life. you can imagine how

was firmly against it at this point now this comes after earlier in the day the federal supreme court issued a state order cooling for the suspension of the referendum until it reaches a final ruling now this is actually an order that should be buying the forward to kurds even though shortly after the supreme court expressed itself a statement came out from the regional prime minister's office saying that the referendum was still going ahead but according to the do thousand and five constitution well the federal supreme court is the authority that rules in case of ethnic sectarian and regional political problems in this country and the kurds were fully part of the process of writing that constitution so they are at the moment at least publicly showing still that posture of the. whether there are some sort of negotiations going on between erbil and baghdad at the moment is something that one could fairly be confident about. aid workers say the range of crisis at the bangladesh me and more border is now one of the worst biggest humanitarian catastrophes in the world they say they're str

say they'll go ahead with an independence vote next week despite a ruling by iraq supreme court. suspending the referendum the court ordered that the poll be postponed until questions about its legality have been addressed the referendum will be held on september twenty fifth in the three provinces that make up the oil rich kurdish region as well as this few territories the government of baghdad regional neighbors iran and turkey and the u.s. have all called for the vote to be delayed fearing that it could create instability which would help isolate hold of the i meet us more now from arab in the capital of the kurdish region. more pressure to postpone the referendum this time coming from the british government the u.k. defense secretary michael fallon is here in erbil where he is meeting with kurdish president must me he was earlier in baghdad and he said from there that he was coming here to try to convince the kurds to postpone the vote he also said that the u.k. was firmly against it at this point now this comes after earlier in the day the federal supreme court issued a stat

most popular books in the supreme court's gift shop is called "supreme chef." he is the supreme chef. supreme court spouses meet for lunch and exchange catering -- they rotate catering responsibilities. he was always number one pick. tells decided the perfect tribute would be a cookbook. i know he would have loved to have a cookbook with his name on it. he had about 150 recipes i disk, she picked 30 out of them. i showed the selection to my that he, and she said would not have picked those. all the recipes in that book are picked by my daughter. there is one entry on the salads that says her season -- jane's caesar salad. so she put one of her own recipes. we are almost out of time. markeytioning margie -- -- markey's book. book.ty's i actually -- last week i did a speech at a naturalization ceremony in judgment is chambers, brian was -- i knew he was your trainer. source and what's the justice's routine? he said first he wanted to see me do a plank, this is the picture. [laughter] [applause] >> he didn't want to give away the secrets. could you describe your r

and probably new justice of the supreme court. and how we can square, when i say our doubts about judicial capacity, our concern for constraining the court's ability to read whatever they want into the equal protection clause. our respect for the democratic process and these things sometimes conflict. and that i think is the job that all of us face in trying to carry out his legacy. >> thank you. thank you. amy wax? >> thank you for having me. and i'm very glad to be here. in the paper, the chapter in which i base this talk, i address the rule of expertise, the use of specialized knowledge and methodology in justice scalia's opinions and especially his education decisions but others too. and here is some of what i am going to be saying or reporting about justice scalia might be intentioned with some of what shep had said, which i think shows that justice scalia is not always consistent in the way that he treats expertise and here i'm referring specifically to his philosophy of deference to administrative agency. so i think that it

welcome to the annual supreme court preview. i am cara stein, vice policy of program which most of you know is a national network ofld lawyers, law students, judges and policy makers who believe the law should be enforced to improve people's lives. here we are again. after a supreme court term that many felt was lackluster despite the much delayed addition of a nice justice to the bench, we are looking at an upcoming term that promises the high-stakes we had grown accustomed to in recent years. you need only look at the first two weeks of oral arguments to see what i mean.of during just those first five days, the court will consider the constitutionality of the president's travel ban, the legitimacy of wisconsin's redistricting scheme and whether american workers can be forced to arbitrate t disputes with employers as opposed to have a day in court. some may say the stakes are too high. to lead us through discussion with our distinct panel we have the privilege of welcoming a new, to this event, steven schwinn. he is a professor

qualified by that supreme court for life. should be. brought difficult time for boggart on the political situation is born or die and. gordo week three ended by. the prime minister in the general election in. a roman catholic priest has made his first public appearance after being held hostage for four months by fighters linked to i saw in the southern philippines a priest was rescued in juarez city on saturday and the army stormed the fires console center inside a mosque tamil alan duggan has more from the mila. father cheat us of the noblest presented by the top leadership of the thing the military here at the headquarters in manila he was not allowed to taking questions from journalists but he issued a short statement he says that he is grateful to be alive and. he's asking for everyone to pray for him us taken on day one from a cathedral in our we city in the southern philippines he's the most high profile hostage under the mao tse group according to the philippine military his rescue means that the siege is almost over. and. more t

there at live from coming up thailand's supreme court is going to bring its corruption verdict against the former prime minister fled the country. as saudi arabia allowed women to drive for the very first time from next year. and . discovery has revealed a brand new work by one of the world's most popular authors more than a century after his death. iraq has over the kurdistan regional government to surrender control of its airports or face an embargo on international flights as part of mounting pressure on the kurdish leadership over its secession referendum on monday initial results showed most people voted yes in the non-binding poll reports from air built the rhetoric and threats continue and from both sides. if you look at me as i get that i still is still occupying some parts of coke and some parts of the rock i sill is still a threat to the cities with some of the brothers in iraqi kurdistan a living we must not divide iraq according to or through all viral referendum that is completely rejected such language will go down well with the international community including the us an

court to take our case in june, which was shortly after the supreme court got a new ninth justice with neil gorsuch. now the court's in a position to take this issue up again. and we're hopeful that it will grant our petition as soon as it comes back for its new term in october. of course you can't predict what the supreme court will do, but you would think, if they wanted to resolve this issue in rebecca frederick's case, they would still want to do it now. ,e are hopeful if all goes well the court will enter a favorable decision in june, which will mean by this time next year, every government worker in the country, every level of government will be free to choose for themselves whether they want to give any of their money to a union. that will be an incredible victory for worker freedom if it happens, but that won't be the end of the story, because there will be other things that have to be done to ensure that governments and unions respect employees rights. to talk about that, i will hand things over terry: well, thank you, colin, for organizing this and thank you to the heritage f

kenya's supreme court annuled last month's presidential election and ordered a rerun within 60 days. the vote was won by the incumbent. the decision is a major victory for the opposition leader, who claims that the results had been manipulated in kenyatta's favor. >> jubilation inside kenya's supreme court. the court agreed that there was irregularities. >> for the first time in the history, a ruling has been made by the courts nullifying irregular elections of the president. >> the judges voted 4-2 in favor of the petition. the chief justice did not accuse of vote rigging but blaming the electoral commission for failing to transmit results. opposition supporters couldn't contain their joy. the entire nation had awaited today's rulings amid protests and violence but notes the opposition are celebrating. >> i believe this court of justice now. >> president kenyatta urged all sides to remain peaceful and said he would accept the court's ruling. >> i personally disagree with the ruling that has been made today. but i respect it. reporter: kenyatta's tone changed by the time he met suppo

court and that a subsequent election. 0ne supreme court and that a subsequent election. one thing we need to see now is all the parties coming together to agree a set of standards. what should the next election look like, you should manage it, and what would it mean to have an election that meets the hurdle costa and then we can move forwards and hopefully have an election that everyone can accept the result of. good to have your thoughts. more now on the death of cardinal cormac mcconnell. thank you for coming in. what are your memories? i remember a very jovial character, a warm and welcoming person who got on very well with the people that he encountered. they liked him. he liked them. it did not matter if they were people in the pew or high up they were people in the pew or high up officials in rome for the back kind of any ability stood him in good stead in rome. it meant that he was able to make use of his influence. he knew the city and the workings of the vatican very well. he was brought on to various important committees in the catholic church in rome and it me

was firmly against it at this point now this comes after earlier in the day the federal supreme court issued a state order for the suspension of the referendum until it reaches a final ruling now this is actually an order that should be. for the kurds even though after the supreme court expressed itself a statement came out from the regional prime minister's office saying that the referendum was still going ahead but according to the new thousand and five well the federal supreme court is the authority that rules in case of ethnic sectarian and regional political problems in this country and the kurds were fully part of the process of writing that constitution so they are at the moment at least publicly showing still that posture of the foreigners whether there are some sort of negotiations going on between erbil and baghdad at the moment is something that one could fairly be confident about. and still ahead an al-jazeera boarding up caribbean islands prepare for yet another hurricane has to pray for maria gain strength. and in sports well look at how to manage style and could benefit

the supreme court said that was ok. because places where liquor by the drink is sold can be dangerous. they made very light of it. in 1961 when the court decided the case against florida, it was a woman who today we would call battered. her philandering husband had humiliated her to the breaking point. she spied her young son's baseball bat in the corner of a room. brought it down over her husband's had with all her might. he fell, hit his head against a hard floor. end of their altercation, beginning of her murder prosecution. she was from hillsboro county, florida. they did not put women on the jury rolls. she argued that denies me the opportunity to be judged by it jury of my peers. of course it would include women. the supreme court and another clip opinion said -- glib opinion said women have nothing to complain about. plato that the survey don't want to. give a want to serve, they can go to the clerk's office and volunteer. the exemption is perfectly reasonable because, after all, women are the center of home and

local federal courts were instructed by the supreme court to issue such orders and decrees as might be necessary to achieve admission to public schools without the guard -- regard to race, and with all deliberate speed. during the past several years, many communities in our southern states have instituted public school plans for graduate progress in the enrollment and attendance of school children of all ages in order to bring themselves into compliance with the law of the land. thus they demonstrated to the world that we are a nation in which law, not men, are supreme. i regret to say that this crew, -- the corner stone of our liberties was not observed in this instance. it was my hope that this localized situation would be brought under control by the present state authorities. if the use of local police our -- power had been sufficient, our traditional method of leading the problem in those hands -- leaving the problem and those hands would have been pursued. but when large gatherings of obstructionist made it impossible for the decrees of the court to be carried out, nationallaw an

hello i'm down in jordan this is our jazeera live from doha also coming up thailand's supreme court is expected to deliver corruption verdict against former prime minister yingluck shinawatra fled the country last month. changing gears saudi arabia would allow women to drive for the first time from next year. and donald trump says he'll go to puerto rico after being criticized for his lack of empathy in the u.s. territory hit by hurricane maria. iraq is over the kurdistan regional government to surrender control of its airports or face an embargo on international flights as part of mounting pressure on the kurdish leadership everett secession referendum on monday initial results show most people voted yes in the non-binding referendum but reports from. the rhetoric and threats continue and from both sides. iraq to me that at that i still is still occupying some parts of kirkuk and some parts of iraq i still is still a threat to the cities with some of our brothers in iraqi kurdistan a living we must not divide iraq according to or through all viral referendum that is completely rejecte