>> welook. i don't know what the president knew or didn't know. he often throws out these little teasing comments. the reality is "the new york times" has already sort of shown is that there have been stories out there. there have been rumors out there for decades. if past scandals are any more of a guide, we will see a lot more people coming forward saying, oh, by the way, x, y, and z. these kind of things. it's part of the crime and part of the misconduct that it's always one-on-one, it's one person's word against another and people don't have quite enough information to want to mount criminal charges or allegations or quit a job or take back their support and so forth until the dam burst. ask bill cosby about that. >> julian, here is the question a lot of people might be looking at this and saying if it was well known, even though errol brings up great points, if it was one-on-one, you didn't know what to believe, but if it was well known you'll have poem say the dems took this money any way. to that you say what? is there a risk to democrats r