court of appeal essentially dealt him a blow and said those charges were dropped irrationally and that they should be reinstated he appealed that he lost that appeal and this is where we are today so this is a party that has waited for the formality so to say if only he could not heed the call briefly what would the repose of presidency look like anticorruption growing the economy and these are all the things that south africans want to has a very good sort of a reputation and image he is associated with the the mandela school of politics so to say so people are looking at this person who's quite a good and clean record and he is associated with the place for what the what people would call the base of the a.n.c. he is a business person he's one of south africa's richest men two people say he's not in this for the money to to grow he has his pocket that this is somebody who really genuinely wants to come in and clean up the country and grow the economy christine we thank you. thankful. now to some of the other stories making news around the world liberia's ex president ellen johnson si

>> maryland court of appeals that affirmed the maryland tax then they brought the writ of error to the supreme court september 1818 and the court took up jurisdiction and set for arguing and started to argue the following february. one historian discovered during his own research was that this was almost certainly a contrived case. he found information from the governor of maryland saying basically they set this up precisely to test the constitutionality of the bank. this isn't unheard of in history but again, interesting insight that the bank was a significant issue since 1791 and people wanted to resolve the question. >>host: whether or not there was constitutionality of the federal or national bank. 1819 the supreme supreme court was just moving into new spaces at the u.s. capitol building that was burned during the war in 1812 and we will learn more about those spaces in which the early supreme court operated here in washington. >> in this chamber where such landmark cases such as dred scott and the united states would have been heard and argued and presented to the court. walking

supreme court is already greed to hear an appeal of a similar decision from the ninth circuit court of appeals in san francisco. the supreme court has agreed to hear the case and will take it up in april. >>> a state lawmaker is facing allegations of a hostile work environment. assembly woman cristina garcia from los angeles is on a leave of absence pending investigation into claims that she groped a former staffer. she is now accused of improper conversations about sex, and drinking while at work. this comes as lawmakers held their second hearing today on how to improve the climate in sacramento. >> what separates just being a jerk of a boss from being someone who has crossed the line into something that's an offense? people don't know where that line is and that's causing a lot of anxiety. we want a better workplace. we don't want a workplace where everyone is scared. >> state lawmakers will continue to hold hearings over the next month with the goal of rolling out new policies by the end of april. >>> up next, preventing wildfires in the east bay hills. >> when you have, um, ground

also, supreme court today refused to rule on daca instead, instructing liberal 9th circuit court of appeals to expeditiously deal with the decision. that ruling only a temporary setback, president trump correctly pointing out his administration is likely to win once the supreme court takes up the case after 9th circuit court appeal process is completed. and mexico's president throwing a his hissy fit, canceling a to washington because president trump still insists that mexico pay for that wall, mexico president slowly learning when president trump makes approve is, he sticks to it -- and makes a promise, he sticks to us, and joining us, these gusts t gust s -- gift gifts join us. despite worst effort of deep state and hell bent dems, congressman matt gates, judicial watch chris fairly, fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett with us, and ed rollins and washington times charlie hurt on power of google, amazon, apple, facebook and how can we stop their dominion over our planet. our top story, the american public would know little about subversive effort of dems and deep state if not for effort o

to go around the ninth circuit court of appeals in california but the supreme court handed him a setback that they won't touch it until the end of the appeals. it gave him a setback and gives a reprieve for daca now but some live in uncertainty. >> i studied and worked very hard ever since i got this country. just the uncertainty what my life might be tomorrow and my life is in then hands of these legislators, that they don't see us as humans, basically. >> the daca program will stay in place as the ongoing daca debate stays in the court system. >>> closer to naming its nine member board. the educational nominating panel voted on the 27 names they would submit to the mayor. the mayor has 20 days to make appointments and could request more names which would require an additional ten days for approval. >>> head over to the nbc10 app for a full list of the 27 candidates. >>> right now in old city, the entire neighborhood is feeling the financial burn from a massive four alarm fire that put businesses on hold. it was scheduled to be demolished this week. investigators say not so fast they st

court of appeals in san francisco. the supreme court will take up the case in april.>>> a man pulled from a burning car by a good samaritan. the video that shows quick thinking and life-saving action.>>> the challenges some parents face keeping their special needs in public school could get easier if a bill working its way through the senate gets passed into law. we will talk about that after the break. >>> the smuckers company pulling dog food the tested positive for a drug used to euthanize animals. 10 varieties of gravy train. seven varieties of kibbles and bits. overweight dog food and nine varieties of skippy dog food. they say the low levels of the drug do not pose a threat to pets. it apologized to customers. they did not say whether euthanasia drug might have come from. >>> a lawmaker introduce legislation to allow students to use certain medical marijuana products while on campus during the school day. the legislation applies to students k-12 who have special needs.>> reporter: we are exploring the case of an

. >> the supreme court's announcement sends the case back to the 9th circuit court of appeals in san francisco. >> for more on the ruling we are joined by the professor of law from hastings. thank you for coming back. the supreme court declines to hear the appeal. does that mean that the department of homeland security must continue to accept the renewal applications for those enrolled. >> it seems that is the case. remember the trump administration initially set a deadline of march 5th for this program. and many of us who are helping these people get their applications in time worked within a narrow time frame. right now the department of homeland security isn't getting new applications but they are willing to renew the applications of those already on daca status. >> the deadline of march 5th means nothing now. >> now the case goes back to the 9th circuit. by the time that the 9th circuit rules, it will likely be summer. if it gets back to the supreme court, we're looking at a year from now. >> professor, this is not a ruling on the merits of the case. this is just a procedural iss

the supreme court will not hear the case which means the ninth circuit court of appeals will take this case this year. daca recipients can continue to renew their residents and work permits which is a welcome development for thousands of undocumented bay area families. >> for daca recipients, this is a huge relief. they no longer have to be apprehensive about what will happen in the coming months and continue to live here and contribute to society. >> these are children and they talk to me and they talk to me in english and they grew up here. they don't know -- they have nothing -- nobody to come back to. they belong here. >> today the president criticized the ninth circuit court calling it the worst. a white house spokesperson said the administration believes daca is illegal and will eventually be thrown out by the supreme court. the program gives temporary prodirection to -- protection to immigrants. >>> a teenager thanks doctors for saving her life. they thought she was dead. she had been shot in the chest, stomach and arm. three surgeries later, she's going home. >> i've seen a lot

it would have been deep in the dungeons of the new york courts of appeal. just laying away with its $100 filing fee. what happened was that weismann took on another attorney. he was not a very famous attorney, either. although he had argued before the supreme court. frank harvey field saw the error and he actually got a justice to agree to let the writ of error go through. when i was alerted to the fact that weismann had been charged with practicing law without a license, i tried to find out when he got the license. i wrote to the court of appeals, charged with determining that, and i asked any name spelling that i could find, and i found that no henry weismann was ever licensed to practice law in new york. so essentially what happened, a, the case was very close to never getting to the court. and b, by the way, weismann never called himself an attorney. he called himself of counsel. he did get the right to argue before the supreme court. ms. swain: weismann turns out to be one of the interesting characters in this entire story. he starts out organizing the

>> you're talking about tlooefls of appeals. a district court. the dc circuit court of appeal. and the supreme court. it's hard to imagine that could get done in less than three months. >> that's the two equities. you don't want him under oath but you don't want to drag it out. it's not inconceivable the obstruction faze could be over in is the umer. >> the fact they want to talk to the president does indicate they're at the end of some aspect of it. you wouldn't bring the president in early on in the investigation. >> that's right. remember also that mueller is subject to the department of justice rules and guidelines which say you do not issue subpoenas and do overt nfgt investigate i have acts within three months. 90 days of an election. >> james comey should have read that before he destroyed clintons campaign. >> yes. and not everyone applies. there are exceptions. >> a famous one in 2016. >> mueller would follow it. >> dwrou think there's political damage for the president if he does not appear before mueller? >> not with his base. the question is whether or not this rise

the court of appeals and come directly to the supreme court and the supreme court said we're not going to do that. although it did say they expect the appeals court to rule expeditiously. that was the term. as a practical matter, what does this mean? it means this case is staying out of the supreme court for at least several more months. it's going to have to go through the court of appeals. this judge in san francisco said the government wrongly tried to shut daca down, used illegal reasoning to shut daca down, and he ordered the federal government to keep daca going. the trump administration appealed that in california. we're going to have to let that go through process, have the court of appeals decide and then come back to the supreme court. that means daca will remain on the books for at least another year, year and a half, and this whole business, katy about march 5th, it's a dead letter. so people can continue to renew their daca status for at least another year or year and a half. >> congress can continue to put this off, i presume, pete? >> yeah. it takes the pressure off them

court of appeals judges in one year than ever done in american history. >> [applause] v.p. pence: the soaring accountability at the v.a., passing a national defense authorization act, with the largest increase in military spending since the days of ronald reagan. we've made incredible progress. there are a lot of people to thank. i want to ask these leaders to stand. i want you to give me a chance. i will start from the lower end up. conference vice chairman roy blunt, conference chairman johnson, majority whip john cornyn, and majority leader mitch mcconnell. the is a team of leaders in united states senate. and this administration and america are in your debt. in the house of representatives, i can tell you having spent more time there than in my current duties, as president of the senate, this is the strongest group of leaders i have witnessed in my life. from the chairwoman to our great majority whip steve scully's, -- steve scalise, stand up plese. to house speaker paul ryan, the speaker of the house. >> [applause] mindpence: would you all getting on your feet and than

the general rule is that all of the article 3 judges at the district court level and the court of appeals level are bound by the precedence set by the supreme court. and that's true of every supreme court precedent, not simply mccullough. >> are there particular provisions of the constitution -- we have referred to the necessary and proper clause that are directly related to this case and that people should know about. >> well, there are various things. the federal government has the power to coin money, although we didn't have a central federal currency at the time. the federal government has the power to do a number of things with regard to financial affairs, infrastructure for the postal roads, to raise taxes to spend for the general welfare. and part of what marshall does in mccullough is give you a list of these other powers that congress expressly has, and then draws the connection that that, the necessary and proper clause means it then has the ability to give effect to those, many of which are relate dodd this question of managing the financial affairs of the nation. >> this twitt

district court, the fifth circuit court of appeals and finally the u.s. supreme court. they all denied the appeal. >> matters became desperate. now we had no more appeals or challenges. on april 19th of 1999, the final death warrant was issued. we had struck out. we had failed. and he was going to die. >> the state set an execution date. >> we drove over to angola. john came into the room. we didn't tell him we were coming, but he knew why we were there. and he looked at us and said, what's the date? we looked aim him and said, john, it's may 20th, which was basically a month off. >> i'd been around death row at that time long enough to understand what was going on. i was like, wow, it's my turn, it's my time. so i was trying to be strong. i was trying to, like, understand what's getting ready to happen. i'm getting ready to die for a crime i did not commit, anxiety kicked in. i didn't know how else to accept the reality that they're getting ready to kill me. >> and then john did a really remarkable thing. he said, my youngest son, john jr., is the first person in my fa

of appeal and possibly the supreme court which is what the parents of charlie gard did. it was quite a long legal process. but both his parents and alder hey hospital say they have his best interests at heart. thank you very much. after months of wrangling, mps have released a report by the financial regulator which said a unit of rbs mistreated thousands of small firms. the global restructuring group was marketed as an expert service that could save a business, but according to the report took "inappropriate" action against them — including new fees and high interest rates. our economics correspondent andy verity is here. what does the report tell us? well this division that claim to be a turnaround division was systematically not putting turnaround at the top of its priorities but instead putting making profits and —— improving the financial position of the bank at the top of its priorities. that was widespread and in some respects systematics vote up the bank said the most serious allegation as it sees it, that it deliberately targeted viable businesses to asset

a court of appeal upheld the verdict but the met has taken the case to the supreme court. the result will be important in deciding weather the police can be held to account for breaching victims' rights. and we can exclusively speak to one of those women you just heard about, who was driven to a police station byjohn worboys after he'd attacked her. we are going to call her fiona this morning — not her real name — and she'sjoined by her solicitor harriet wistritch. thank you for talking to us. how did you come into contact with worboys? in 2003i you come into contact with worboys? in 20031 was out with some friends are celebrating a friend's birthday party. after the night out, i was with some groups of friends who hailed a cab for me. i got into the. —— in to the cab. there was nothing which made me feel uncomfortable or threatened by his manner, he was just a chatty, talking about the night out, asking where i lived, did i live on my own, asking about my family. i was expecting to him it was my friend's birthday party. and i had just had a baby so that was the fi

the decision by the supreme court sent the case back to the ninth circuit court of appeals in san francisco. daca recipients are cheering the supreme court's movements eight will get more time to get congress to approve a solution. our report is live in san jose with reactions. >> reporter: there are hundreds of daca recipients here in santa clara county, and while the future remains uncertain, they are hoping that this extra time work in the favor.>> reporter: mario lopez works as a policy a -- aid. he is also a daca recipient and for months has been living in fear that his protected status is about to end. >> i felt a lot of anxiety over my future.>> reporter: but today, the u.s. supreme court decided not to hear the case to dismantle daca. >> i felt really good about the court really because i think it gives us a little bit more time to do a lot of advocacy and at the congressional level to come up with a solution.>> reporter: the supreme court sent the case back to the appellate level, and that is something that will take time.>> it really buys us about a year of time now and if we can

coach -- coast all the way to the supreme court. sun microsystems cofounder has been battling surfers and others over access to martin's beach south of half moon bay. last august the appeals court ruled he violated the california coastal act by locking a gate on his 89 acre property locking public access to the beach.>>> golden gate park a coast guard rescue helicopter was forced to make an emergency landing on the outfield grass of a baseball field. rob rawls talk to the pilot about her decision to put the chopper down.>> reporter: the

it almost certainly be appealed to the stream court and instead of -- supreme court. instead of deadline to end the program this coming monday, the program's in place almost certainly for another year. >> mark, i look forward to your whoppers of the week every week and we know that daca is the subject this week. >> the double speak on this, michelle, just remarkable. president trump ended the daca program on september 5 saying by march 5, it was dead, it was over unless congress could figure it out and use it had as a bargaining chip. now that the democrats didn't go along with his chip, which was to build the wall and to limit legal immigration, he tweeted this out this week. look at some tweets, he said democrats no longer talking daca. out of sight, out of mind. nancy pelosi truly doesn't care about them, meaning the dreamers. democrats have totally forgotten about daca. not a lot of interest in the subject. to be clear, democrats want the daca program to be permanent. the president has ended the program. what he's referring to here is they won't go for his deal to

it would go to a district court, the dc circuit court of appeals, and then the united states supreme court. it's hard for me to imagine that could get done in less than three or four months. >> those are the two equities, right? you don't want to put him under oath, but you also don't want to drag it out. they're hoping for this to end as quickly as possible. it's not inconceivable the obstruction phase could be over in the summer maybe, but if you have this big legal fight over whether you're going to talk or not t stretches it out. >> the fact they want to talk to the president does indicate they're at the end of some aspect of it because you wouldn't bring the president in -- >> that's right. >> -- early on in an investigation. >> that's right. remember also that mueller is subject to the department of justice rules and guidelines which explicitly say that you do not issue subpoenas and do overt investigative acts within three months, 90 days of an election. >> james comey, he should have read that before he destroyed hillary clinton's campaign, but that's -- >> that applies to a

and it will go up to the court of appeals and then the supreme court. and i think it will be heard pretty quickly. this is going to get top priority if trump's lawyers should oppose it. >> nick, always good to talk to you about this. you ma i can me smarter. barbara, thank you for your analysis. >> thanks very much. coming up, one year after inspiring a rallying cry for the resistance, i'll talking with senator elizabeth warren ahead. next, why is the president set on having a military parade? a possibility explanation in thing 1, thing two next. president trump wants to see a military parade through the nation's capital and today, defense secretary james mattis confirmed the pentagon is now drawing up options for him. but not everyone thinks a parade of thanks and gun trucks is such a great idea. >> it kind of to me speaks of insecurity. it's what north korea does to show the world how tough they are. >> i think confidence is silent. and insecurity is loud. and for that reason, i would be against flaunting our strength. we don't need to. >> you don't n

the trump administration asked the supreme court to take the case immediately, bypassing the court of appeals. a rare move if it had been granted. and today it was not. the supreme court said it's not going to hear this case in a very brief order. it simply says this, it is assumed that the court will decide this case. number one, the march 5th date is meaningless, the date on which the administration wanted to shut this down. the date often referred to as the daca deadline for congress to act. number two it means we're not going to get a supreme court decision on this case until next year at the earliest. because the calendar is already full for this year. court's not going to hear the case this term. so it has to go through the appeals court and then be appealed to the supreme court, probably in the summer or the fall, so the supreme court might hear it as early as this fall or early next year. would mean the decision next year. so the daca program as a practical manner lives on for at least another year. it's a legal setback for the trump administration. who had hoped the supreme c

supreme court turned down to bypass a federal appeals court and get the supreme court justices to intervene in the fate of daca. the decision is a blow to the trump in ministration and a relief for the daca recipient since -- recipients. the decision by the supreme court keeps daca and place for now and sends the case back to the ninth circuit court of appeals in san francisco. >>> there is a new sports arena coming tokeland for video games. coming up find out how gaming is a big business. . >> we will have several different items here. >>> we are looking at the forecast, we have shower stall there, will they linger through tomorrow? and what about the next round of rain come your way? that is coming up next.>>> a senior researcher tells us why this could pose a heart attack. that is coming up. >>> new at 10 pm, the e cigarettes could be more of a health risk than first thought. they say that daily e-cigarette use could lead to heart attack. many smokers use e-cigarette is to stop smoking? >> reporter: that is right, that is what they are telling us, we spoke to the senior author of the stu

in which case they overturn the 9th circuit court of appeals. i think they would be parter to get on board and try to carb of something out that they want instead of taking the risk that the supreme court find it unconstitutional and they then have no leg to and on. charles: deroy mentioned every time this comes up, there are calls of racism. how do you combat that? >> the president has proposed similar solutions similar to those proposed several decades ago under democratic administrations. i think recognizing that terrorists have come in through the dangerous visa lottery system should be a common sense solution and initiative to understand we need to do basic reforms that have been talked about by both sides of the aisle. we need congressmen and women who need to act. and have a positive immigration system based off of merit and improving our economic status in the united states. charles: we'll say it sounds like common sense solutions, but i guess in d.c.h c., nothing is -- but i guess in d.c., nothing is simple. i'm mark and i quit smoking

supreme court keeps daca in place for now and sends the case back to the ninth circuit court of appeals in san francisco. >>> time is 4:11. the pentagon confirming the first transgender recruit is under contract to serve in the military since a federal court blocked a ban by president trump. in july of last year, president trump said he would prohibit transgender people from serving in the military. a number of genders blocked the ban. they have to meet strict criteria, including certification by a medical provider about the status of their health. there have been estimated that 4000 transgender troops are already in the u.s. military. >>> 20 states are suing to end the affordable care act. if the lawsuit is arguing that it is no longer constitutional since the individual mandate was eliminated. the supreme court has ruled twice that the law is constitutional. almost 12 million people recently signed up during the last enrollment period. >>> president trump is heading to california to see the prototypes for a possible border wall. the washington post reports he is coming in mid-march to

thereby bypassing all of the other appeals courts in the united states. will the supreme court has decided that this case is serious enough and has the merits you go through the entire u. s. school system and that is where it stands right now this the decision. by all time to end the daca program and protect the so called dreamers is currently blocked me there is a reprieve for those seven hundred thousand also dreamers who are in the united states right now. the white house has already reacted to this decision it says that stockf this program put in place by president obama. is unlawfu. does this mean of the dream is themselves. what of a reprieve for them because that was an actual and dates for the doc a program for those seven hundred thousand people? who have that protection their protections was set to run out certainty for these one hundreds of thousands of immigrants in the united states for now they are that little bit more protected? and those who already have these protections can apply for renewals no new protections will be granted to those w

and the court of appeals did, because it's a very serious constitutional issue. i don't think anyone knows for sure how this supreme court would resolve it. and it would be a roll of the dice on both sides if they decided to take that fight all the way. it would also be a substantial delay in the investigation. >> you think mueller might be willing to just do it in writing? he submits questions in writing and then the president and his lawyers and his team can write back the answers? >> i think that proposal is a complete nonstarter. because everyone knows that what are known in the legal world as intering interin interrogatories are handled almost entirely by the lawyers. and you are not getting anything like a spontaneous result -- response from the subject that you're hoping to interview. so i think written questions and answers is something mueller will reject without hand. there are a lot of other variables. how long the interview would be. what subjects would be covered. would there be a transcript. who else would be present. would it be tape recorded? vide

and it will go up to the court of appeals and then the supreme court. and i think it will be heard pretty quickly. this is going to get top priority if trump's lawyers should oppose it. >> nick, always good to talk to you about this. you ma i can me smarter. barbara, thank you for your analysis. >> thanks very much. coming up, one year after inspiring a rallying cry for the resistance, i'll talking with senator elizabeth warren ahead. next, why is the president set on having a military parade? a possibility explanation in thing 1, thing two next. why create something this extravagant? or make a back seat that feels nothing like a back seat? why give it every feature you could want, along with a few you didn't know you needed? it's simple. you can build a car, or you can build a cadillac. come in now for this exceptional offer on the cadillac ct6. get this low-mileage lease on this 2018 cadillac ct6 from around $549 per month. visit your local cadillac dealer. from around $549 per month. if yor crohn's symptoms are holding you back, and your current trea

supreme court of columbia. it goes is a d.c. case, to the supreme court. that is the old way to appeal. involve slaves imported into the district of columbia. district of columbia local law is coveredc by maryland where we by today, and for a while virginia law in what is today alexandria, virginia. retro8, there was the session where they gave alexandria back to virginia. these cases involve what happened in those jurisdictions. those jurisdictions are governed by maryland and virginia. i don't want to get into the technicalities. we don't have three or four hours to explain them. i think i do a good job in the book. the issue is this. if you moved to the district, you had to register the amount of slaves you brought to the district. you had a certain amount of time to do it and you had to assert you are moving to make it your permanent residents. you could not import slaves if you lived in the district unless you inherited them. you could not go to virginia, buy a slave, and bring it to the maryland portion.

supreme court has agreed to hear an appeal of a similar decision from the ninth circuit in san francisco. the justices are set to take up the case in april. >>> a bay area athlete made olympic history. 17-year-old palo alto figure skater, vincent zhou became the first person to land a quadruple lutz. he jumped and rotated four times before landing on the opposite foot. he received his highest score of the season. first to land that quad. he is in 12th place ahead of the free skate competition. he told reporters he was telling himself, remember to breathe. >> breathe. >> and he did. he did. >> and here's the latest medal counts. norway leading with 19 medals followed by germany, netherlands, and canada. and then the u.s. with eight medals, including five golds. and south korea is getting the first medal. so there they are hosting the games. and it's exciting and they finally got their first gold ever. >> reporter: and the skating is phenomenal this year. >>> our time is 5:54. a month after the city of san francisco dropped columbus day. what a group of italian americans are working on and

thisuld, if he loses appeal, of your the supreme court just down the road from here. right now this is the greatest -- the latest chapter in what brought down even the president and led to that five-year conviction on corruption charges for the heir apparent to the samsung empire, if you want to call it that. the appellate process goes through the high court, a central district court building behind me. the sense i am getting from a lot of the people here is that there's a little bit of fatigue, if you want to call it that. the company has moved on. samsung electronics had record full-year earnings, record fourth-quarter earnings. well in doing really the semiconductors with all the smartphone demand. they are doing well with oled screens to the like of apple. the company is doing well. they have new division heads across the board and a new ceo the beginning of the fourth quarter, so they have moved on. ,outh korea has a new president and the winter olympics that begin on friday. i think a lot of people here as they begin to bundle up with the cold weather are lookin

court, the supreme court of the state he's in that they were unconstitutional under the u.s. constitution. senator scarnotti is legally bound to comply even while he waits for an appeal from the u.s. supreme court. if he continues to refuse, the pennsylvania supreme court could the hold him in contempt and put him in jail. that kind of flagrant lawlessness appears to be a pattern with the republican party currently engaged in a full various institutions across the country, various institutions of justice that don't suit its ends, like, for instance, house intel chairman devin nunes is doing with his memo. we'll take a look at what he's up to and why, next. >>> house intelligence chairman devin nunes has become a national character, with his secret memo that tries to discredit the people running that investigation. it's not playing well with some of the folks back home in his central california district. the editorial board of the fresno bee called nunes trump's stooge in a headline, sheltered in a relatively republican district and may believe he will pay no political price f

of dollars, the state supreme court declined to hear a a -- in the november, the california court of appeal confirmed a child court's decision that sherwin williams industries were liable for public nuisance because those companies promoted lead paint for inside home use, knowing it would create serious risk of harm to children in homes built before 1950. the san francisco attorney, dennis herrera today called it a major history. he said these companies have dragged out this indication for 18 years, it's time they stopped shirking their responsibility and start paying to clean up the toxic mess they created. >>> statistics show that this year's flu vaccine was only 25% effective. showed the vaccines were most effective in children ages 6 to 8. and a 59% reduction of risk. adults between the ages of 13 and 49 saw a 38% increase in the flu between the 2014 and 2015 flu season, the illnesses were less than 20%. >>> when it's time for you to get a new car, should you buy one, lease one or subscribe? >> michael finney's here to tell us it depends on how you use your car. >> this is going

still voicing opinions from the courts of appeals. you get to the supreme court and there is push back. they grant a stay. if you have a connection with people in this country, [indiscernible] as to every body else. the ninth circuit says we take our key from the supreme court and only allowing injunctions to go that far. the supreme court is still stating what they have done, even though the state is a more robust stay than the court issued last june. we are oscillating around where we will end up. but that the swings are less radical between the district courts and the court of appeals. the president had engaged in a bit of discrimination and it seems pretty likely, but not certain, that whatever the supreme court winds up saying, that will not be the ultimate [indiscernible] it may be featured in the argument. i'm sure it is something that the justices are thinking about. when the justices decide questions about whether something should be reviewable, they always think down the road. they are certainly also think about the case bef

yesterday he closed a supreme court appeal on the heels of his federal court defeat last year. >>> let's get you caught up on the 2018 olympic winter games. it has bnl a tough day for bay area skaters. >> karen chen finished in 11th place, she said technical mistakes on her jumps and also fell down. the three americans finished in ninth, tenth and 11th place. that's team u.s.a.'s worst finish in this event ever. this is chen's first time at the games and afterwards she gave an emotional interview to our own garvin thomas. you will hear a new piece of it coming up at 5:00 a.m. >>> and as for the current medal count for you, norway continues to leadover overall in those medals, 36, canada is now in second place, germany has fallen to third, the u.s. is close behind in fourth place with 21 medals. you can see the netherlands and france rounding out the top six. >>> coming up next on "today in the bay," this morning a lot of drivers will face a tollbooth during their commute. the next question is for you, have you ever forgotten your fast track? if that's an issue for you we can tell you abo

supreme court. silicon valley billionaire is challenging the landmark law guarantees public access to beaches. he purchased 89 acres of the scenic coastline in 2009. a district court of appeals ruled he violated the coastal act by blocking public access. the supreme court will likely decide within about three months whether it will take up in case. >>> more to come here. what does it take to make it into the middle class in the bay area these days? if you're guessing six figures you're getting close. >>> and unexpected landing in the middle of golden gate park. but an interesting day for kids nearby. >>> and meteorologist sandhya patel will be back with the full forecast. the next chance of rain. a lot more to come . >>> san francisco health officials are sending an urgent warning to drug users ton after three men died overnight. it's believed they overdosed on the powerful drug fentanyl. their byrds were found early this morning near the urban school at page street and massenic avenue. police say n

the supreme court is considering an appeal that could have a major impact on the so—called "gig economy." pimlico plumbers is challenging a ruling that entitled one of its plumbers, gary smith, to basic workers' rights, such as paid holiday — even though he was first hired on a freelance basis. our correspondent simon gompertz is outside the court. simon, what are the implications of this case? it is being seen as importantjust this case? it is being seen as important just because the this case? it is being seen as importantjust because the way workers going nowadays, morejobs becoming self—employed. more toe one estimate that nearly 3 million people work as drivers, careers and suchlike as self—employed and not getting basic employment rights like holiday pay, the minimum wage and sick pay. arriving here this morning, the boss of pimlico plumbers turned up in a mini convoy of two blue bentley is that he owns that he was here to see the argument put, that he wants, which is to say his plumbers do quite well, some are earning over £100,000 a year as self—employed. on the other s

guilty of the original verdicts have been upheld by the appeals court, but this has not hit business results. in 2017, some some's stocks climbed 41%. samsung electronics posted a $69 billion revenue for the previous year, beating intel. korea's new president has campaigned on an anticorruption message. this u-turn in the verdict and the punishment for lee jae-yong raises questions about how the clinical and business elite will be held to account. >> is move onto market news. taking a beating amidst a global selloff. >> the european index significantly in the red as markets follow wall street down. -- share still down less than half a percent in the london puts on -- london ftse 100. the frankfurt dax down nearly 8/10 of 1%. overhe nikkei closed down 2.5%. both europe and asia following wall street's lead off the u.s. index posted its worst figures in two years. dow futures pointing to a further slide when markets open monday. ironically, it was a positive jobs report that set off the downturn. wages and jobs .2 rising inflation, with expected interest rate hikes making corporate bor

court, the supreme court of the state he's in that they were unconstitutional under the u.s. constitution. senator scarnotti is legally bound to comply even while he waits for an appeal from the u.s. supreme court. if he continues to refuse, the pennsylvania supreme court could the hold him in contempt and put him in jail. that kind of flagrant lawlessness appears to be a pattern with the republican party currently engaged in a full various institutions across the country, various institutions of justice that don't suit its ends, like, for instance, house intel chairman devin nunes is doing with his mechmo. we'll take a look at what he's up to and why, next. whatever you're doing to stay healthy... there's something you may be missing. a key part of your wellness that you may be... overlooking. it's your eyes. that's why there's ocuvite, from bausch + lomb. as you age your eyes can lose vital nutrients. ocuvite helps replenish those nutrients. ocuvite has lutein, zeaxanthin, and omega-3. nourish your eyes to help them be their healthy best. ocuvite eye vitamins. be good to yo

this supreme court declined to take up the appeal of a lower court ruling requiring the government to continue daca, the obama era program allowing dreamers to stay inside the u.s. joining me now is justice correspondent pete williams. you've been standing there all day. i've got the outline of the decision, tell me what is means for dreamers who are here now and who are worried about what will happen to them in march. >> it means that the program is going to be in affect for at least a year, maybe a year and a half. as you recall, the trump administration wanted to end it by march 5th. we've known for several weeks that wasn't going to happen because a judge in california said you cannot shut the program down. he issued a nationwide injunction forbidding the trump administration from shutting it down saying the trump administration illegally tried to close it. now the trump administration tried to take that ruling directly here by passing the court of appeals and what the supreme court said, is not so fast, you have to go through the appeals court but we expect the appeals court to a

filled with dig democratic donors and how he gets overturned 9-0 in the supreme court. overturned fifth circuit court of appeals p mueller's investigation is and has been a witch hunt from the very beginning. it's built on a house of cards. tonight it is crashing down. look, if we as a country, if we care about the constitution, if we believe in civil liberties, if we believe in those protections, then the special counsel must be disbanded immediately. by the way, nobody else will say this, all charges against paul manafort and general michael flynn need to be dropped. it's that simple. president trump by the way is reacting to all this breaking news. here is what he said about the memo. >> president trump: i think it's terrible, you want to know the truth, i think it's a disgrace. what's going on in this country, i think it's a disgrace. the memo was sent to congress it was declassified. congress will do whatever they're going to do. but i think it's a disgrace what's happening in our country. when you look at that, and you see that, and so many other things, what's go

first through the 9th circuit court of appeals then through the united states supreme court. >> after the supreme court refused to hear her appeal, patty hearst surrendered at the federal prison at pleasanton, california, to finish her sentence. >> after that time i was advised by george martinez to turn over the documents which we had acquired to him as new counsel. >> martinez got us fired after we brought him into the case at her request. i mean, we found him through a list of divorce lawyers. so, her boyfriend who had kids and a wife could get divorced and marry her. >> al johnson, far more than f. clement atlee bailey, devoted his life to patricia hearst. he's a boston lawyer that spent years in san francisco away from his family. and as soon as she hooks up with bernie shaw, she cuts al johnson dead, and they never speak again. >> i was upset by it obviously, that i had worked as hard as i have ever worked on any case in my life, and i believed in her and in her defense. >> she was on the hook for a very grisly first degree murder. and we got her out of that. had that been under

on monday, the supreme court reviews to hear a white house appeal of lower court rulings saying trump's move to cancel the program was unconstitutional. president trump criticized the court's decision. we tried to get it to move quickly. i think everybody in this room wants to help with daca, but as her bring court just ruled it has to go through the normal channels, so it is going back in. there won't be any surprise. it is really said when every single case filed -- this is in .he ninth circuit we lose, lose, lose. what is i tell us about our core system? daca is going back and we will see what happens from there. amy: that as preresident trump, michael tan. >> what happened in daca was the -- ame court essentially lower court had issued a nationwide injunction requiring the a administration to bring daca back all night and except applications for daca renewals. they reveal that to the ninth circuit am a but at the same time, tried to get the supreme court to take the case right away and jump over the ninth circuit -- which is extraordinary. and says something i think about administra

relief, still pretty forceful opinions from the courts of appeal. the supreme court says if you have a bona fide connection with people in this country we're not granting a stay to you, we're granting a stay to everybody else so the ninth circuit says okay, we are only allowing injunctions to go that far but once they've done that the supreme court is still staying what they've done even though the stay is a militore robust s than the court issued last time. so we're kind of oscillating around where we're going to end up but that the swings are less radical than when we first started out. basically the first injunctions were basically the president has engaged in invidious discrimination and can never -- i think it seems likely but not certain that whatever the supreme court winds up saying that is not going to be the ultimat ultimate. it may well be featured in the argument, i'm sure it's something the justices are thinking about in particular on when the justices decide questions about what should ever be reviewable, they think down the road but t